reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @PT1091943
@PT1091943 - PT1091943
No evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon ~ cuz it did not. Go figure. 🙄 https://t.co/Q0wXZWIjky
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jamie McIntyre, CNN’s military affairs correspondent, reported that he got very close to the Pentagon shortly after the incident. Firefighters were still trying to put out a blaze. He said the fire was still burning in some parts of the Pentagon and described a huge gaping hole in the side of the building. Based on his close-up inspection, he said there was no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. He stated that the only site showing damage was the actual side of the building that had been hit. He added that the only visible pieces were small enough to pick up in a hand, and that there were no large tail sections, wing sections, or fuselage parts anywhere around.
Full Transcript
The Pentagon, CNN's military affairs correspondent, Jamie McIntyre. Jamie, you got very close to where that plane went down. That's right, Judy. A short a while ago, I walked right up to next to the building was firefighters were still trying to put out the blaze. The fire, by the way, is still burning in some parts of the Pentagon, and I took a look at the huge gaping hole that's in the sideway, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are, are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. there are no large tail sections, wing sections fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around.
@PT1091943 - PT1091943
Or~ create a Charitable Revocable Trust~ CRT Up to you. https://t.co/MSYvJwDzIi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Almost every wealthy person in the world uses a structure intended to make them financially “invincible.” The approach is to create a holding company that owns the assets of main businesses. If a main business is sued, it does not matter because it doesn’t own anything. When a business pays dividends, they go directly to the holding company rather than to the individual. If the business gets sued, the structure involves declaring bankruptcy and creating a new business underneath the holding company, so the holding company’s role is limited to owning assets.
Money from the holding company is then given to a trust. The trust has a trustee who decides when the money is passed on to the individual. This is presented as protection regardless of whether the person is sued or the business is sued. The transcript also claims that to be smart, the entities should not all be registered in the same country. It concludes by stating that if billionaires can do it, others can do it too.
Full Transcript
Almost every wealthy person in the world uses this structure because it's how you make yourself financially invincible. What you do is you create a holding company. That company owns the assets to your main businesses, right? So if your main company was to get sued, it doesn't matter because it doesn't own anything. And when your business pays dividends, it goes directly to the holding company, not to you. And if your business gets sued, you just declare bankruptcy and create a new business underneath the holding company, so the holding company doesn't do anything other than own things. So the holding company gives money to the trust, and the trust has a trustee that, that decides when the money is being passed on to you. So whether you are sued or the business is being sued, you're protected. And if you're smart You won't have all these entities registered in the same country. Look, if billionaires can do it, why can't you?