TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @RepMTG

RepMTG
Posted - January 3, 2026 at 4:12 PM
Saved - January 4, 2026 at 11:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve served on the Homeland Security Committee for three years. I’m for strong, secure borders and stopping narco-terrorists. Fentanyl, from Mexican cartels using Chinese precursors, drives overdose deaths. Mexican cartels are largely responsible for deadly drugs. If regime change in Venezuela aimed to save lives, why not act against cartels? Why pardon a Honduran president convicted of cocaine trafficking? Regime change and foreign wars divert money from Americans’ rising costs. Neither party offers real solutions; focus on American economic populism.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I’ve served on the Homeland Security Committee for the past three years. I’m 100% for strong safe secure borders and stopping narco terrorists and cartels from trafficking deadly drugs and human trafficking into America. Fentanyl is responsible for over 70% of U.S. drug overdose deaths and fentanyl comes from Mexican cartels made with chemical precursors from China and trafficked across the U.S. Mexico border. Mexican cartels are primarily and overwhelmingly responsible for killing Americans with deadly drugs. If U.S. military action and regime change in Venezuela was really about saving American lives from deadly drugs then why hasn’t the Trump admin taken action against Mexican cartels? And if prosecuting narco terrorists is a high priority then why did President Trump pardon the former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez who was convicted and sentenced for 45 years for trafficking hundreds of tons of cocaine into America? Ironically cocaine is the same drug that Venezuela primarily traffics into the U.S. The next obvious observation is that by removing Maduro this is a clear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies that will ensure stability for the next obvious regime change war in Iran. And of course why is it ok for America to militarily invade, bomb, and arrest a foreign leader but Russia is evil for invading Ukraine and China is bad for aggression against Taiwan? Is it only ok if we do it? (I’m not endorsing Russia or China) Regime change, funding foreign wars, and American’s tax dollars being consistently funneled to foreign causes, foreigners both home and abroad, and foreign governments while Americans are consistently facing increasing cost of living, housing, healthcare, and learn about scams and fraud of their tax dollars is what has most Americans enraged. Especially the younger generations. Boomers and half of Gen X will cheer on neocon wars and talking points, but the other half of Gen X and majority on down see through it and hate it. Americans disgust with our own government’s never ending military aggression and support of foreign wars is justified because we are forced to pay for it and both parties, Republicans and Democrats, always keep the Washington military machine funded and going. This is what many in MAGA thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong. As the baby boomers slip away both in votes and power, the electoral future will be decided for candidates that focus on American economic populism and promising prosperity for Americans only. As of right now, neither party is offering the solution.

RepMTG
Posted - November 15, 2025 at 2:19 AM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 6:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I say President Trump attacked me and lied about me. I didn’t call him, but I sent texts about the Epstein files—apparently that set him off. He’s fighting to stop the Epstein files from coming out, to scare Republicans before the vote. I’ve supported Trump with time and money, but I don’t worship him. I worship God, serve GA14 and the American people. I remain America First and America Only!!! ❤️

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

President Trump just attacked me and lied about me. I haven’t called him at all, but I did send these text messages today. Apparently this is what sent him over the edge. The Epstein files. And of course he’s coming after me hard to make an example to scare all the other Republicans before next weeks vote to release the Epstein files. It’s astonishing really how hard he’s fighting to stop the Epstein files from coming out that he actually goes to this level. But really most Americans wish he would fight this hard to help the forgotten men and women of America who are fed up with foreign wars and foreign causes, are going broke trying to feed their families, and are losing hope of ever achieving the American dream. That’s what I voted for. I have supported President Trump with too much of my precious time, too much of my own money, and fought harder for him even when almost all other Republicans turned their back and denounced him. But I don’t worship or serve Donald Trump. I worship God, Jesus is my savior, and I serve my district GA14 and the American people. I remain the same today as I’ve always been and I will continue to pray this administration will be successful because the American people desperately deserve what they voted for. For me, I remain America First and America Only!!! ❤️🇺🇸

RepMTG
Posted - November 22, 2025 at 1:13 PM
Saved - November 22, 2025 at 1:47 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I believe in the American people. You are stronger and more resilient than you know. There are no leaders that will save this country, but YOU, the American people can. If we all stitch our torn and tattered beautiful star spangled banner back together, we can do anything.

RepMTG
Posted - November 15, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Saved - November 16, 2025 at 9:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m being contacted by private security as threats rise, fueled by the most powerful man in the world—the man I helped elect. Aggressive rhetoric has historically produced death threats and radicalized followers, this time by the President. As a woman, I take these threats seriously. I’m aware of the fear Epstein victims feel. As a Republican who votes for Trump, his aggression feeds venomous trolls. The Political Industrial Complex must end; our country is worth saving if we pull together.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I am now being contacted by private security firms with warnings for my safety as a hot bed of threats against me are being fueled and egged on by the most powerful man in the world. The man I supported and helped get elected. Aggressive rhetoric attacking me has historically led to death threats and multiple convictions of men who were radicalized by the same type rhetoric being directed at me right now. This time by the President of the United States. As a woman I take threats from men seriously. I now have a small understanding of the fear and pressure the women, who are victims of Jeffrey Epstein and his cabal, must feel. As a Republican, who overwhelmingly votes for President Trump‘s bills and agenda, his aggression against me which also fuels the venomous nature of his radical internet trolls (many of whom are paid), this is completely shocking to everyone. My phone is blowing up with constant amazing support. I’m so thankful! The Political Industrial Complex and the toxic violent nature of American politics must end. Our country is worth saving and it can only be done if we pull together and save ourselves.

RepMTG
Posted - October 1, 2025 at 2:38 PM
Saved - October 1, 2025 at 7:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that all social media influencers receiving payments from the Israeli government or any foreign government to promote their interests should register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) with the Department of Justice. This law, established in 1938, aims to ensure transparency regarding foreign influence on U.S. policies and public opinion. It mandates that individuals working on behalf of foreign entities disclose their relationships and activities. Failing to register can lead to legal consequences, and this statement is not rooted in antisemitism or hatred, but rather in legal obligation.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

All social media influencers being paid by the Israeli government or ANY foreign government to promote a foreign country and a foreign country’s interests, must register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) under the DOJ. “Foreign governments routinely engage in efforts to influence our domestic and foreign policies, legislation, democratic processes, and public opinion. These governments sometimes exert this influence by employing lobbyists, public relations professionals, prominent businesspeople, or former U.S. government officials on their behalf. Such efforts are legal—if they are transparent. Originally enacted in 1938, the Foreign Agents Registration Act—known as FARA—helps the American people and their elected officials understand who is really behind such influence activity. The statute requires persons working on behalf of foreign governments or other foreign principals (including Americans) to disclose their relationships to foreign principals and information about their activities. Agents who fail to register are violating federal law, and they can be prosecuted if their failure is deliberate.” Saying this is not antisemitic or hateful to any people group or foreign country. It’s the law.

@nick_clevelands - Nick Cleveland-Stout

A new document reveals the Israeli government is paying a cohort of 14-18 social media influencers between $6,100 and $7,300 per post https://t.co/jtiMMzJQGD

RepMTG
Posted - September 23, 2025 at 4:34 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 5:01 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

This is a MUST watch. America deserves answers because all we ever got was a cover up.

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

The first of our five-part series on 9/11. Enjoy. https://t.co/qBuJdZWKbl

Video Transcript AI Summary
That story is a lie. The series calls for "a new nine eleven commission. One that is honest. One that is not guided by partisan political interests." It includes findings like "the apparent role that former CIA director John Brennan played in helping bring the nine eleven hijackers to The United States, and the remarkable lengths the CIA went to to protect the nine eleven hijackers from the FBI." It traces to ALEC Station, the CIA's Bin Laden unit in 1999, noting there were "no sources in Al Qaeda" before 9/11. It describes the Hadah Home switchboard in Sana’a as a communications hub, visas issued at the Jeddah consulate, and Omar Al Bayoumi as a Saudi embassy employee who helped the hijackers move to San Diego, arrange housing, and open accounts; his notebook contained an airplane drawing. The official report is labeled a lie and a cover-up.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For twenty four years now, politicians, the media, intel agencies in this country and abroad have all demanded that you believe the official story about nine eleven. And here's what it is. They tell you a group of Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists, many of whom were known to US intel services, somehow managed to evade capture for years as they planned the most significant and elaborate terror attack in human history. We're told that despite repeated encounters with the FBI, the CIA, local law enforcement, airport security, foreign intel organizations, the right information somehow never made it to the right people. The government failed because it just didn't have the intelligence it needed. That's the story. That story is a lie. Nearly twenty five years later, the families of 3,000 civilians are still mourning the murder of their loved ones. Anyone who doubts the official narrative is cast as a kook, a criminal, a fringe conspiracy theorist, and punished. They've been blacklisted and censored and banned. Even as the leaders who failed to protect our country on 09/11 used these attacks as a pretense to expand their own powers and permanently transform The United States. None of this is speculation. All of it is true. Over the course of this series, you will hear accounts from people who lived it. CIA officers and analysts who were theirs. FBI agents from the Bin Laden unit. Family members of the victims. None of these people are kooks. All of them have firsthand information. What they'll tell you is that what you have been told about September 11 is not true. Why are we doing this? Our purpose is in part to make the strongest possible case for a real investigation into nine eleven twenty five years later. A new nine eleven commission. One that is honest. One that is not guided by partisan political interests. One that is not serving foreign powers. To do this investigation, we spent many months looking into what actually happened and speaking to people who saw it. We poured over thousands of pages of documents, mostly primary sources, but also contemporaneous news reports and declassified government documents. Over the course of this investigation, we made numerous findings that shocked us, not least of which the apparent role that former CIA director John Brennan played in helping bring the nine eleven hijackers to The United States, and the remarkable lengths the CIA went to to protect the nine eleven hijackers from the FBI and from domestic law enforcement. Telling the full story requires starting before the attacks, going back to something called ALEC Station, that was the CIA's Bin Laden unit in 1999. Speaker 1: My name is Mark Rossini. I'm a former FBI agent. So from January 1999 to May 2003, I was the FBI New York Joint Terrorism Task Force representative to Alex Station at CIA headquarters. Before nine eleven, there were no sources in Al Qaeda. None. There was a group of Pashtun caretakers. Okay? They called them the Trodpints. Trod pints were these Pashtun people that were Bin Laden's tea boys and tea gals. Right? And they were the great source of the Pakistani intel service that was feeding information from the trod pines to to the ISI to the CIA about what was going on in Al Qaeda. They had all the electronic communication satellite shit in the world, imagery, pin I remember looking at images that had been lotting, you know, in his courtyard, all that. Fine. But what's in his head? What's he saying? What's he doing? These people are 10,000 miles away. They don't give a shit about American law. They don't care about going to jail. They wanna die. How are gonna get a Speaker 0: source inside there? Before September 11, US intel services got most of their intelligence on Bin Laden from what was called the Hadah Home switchboard in Sana'a, Yemen. That was a communications hub that Bin Laden and associates used to communicate with each other. They were at the time living in Yemen. The FBI gained access to this after the nineteen ninety eight embassy bombings in East Africa. Speaker 1: How did we officially get the Hadah home in Sanae, Yemen on the books, on the radar if you will. Okay. Nairobi, 1998, August 7. John Anticef, special agent John Anticef, greatest FBI agent ever in the FBI, even better than me. John flies over to to Nairobi. And one of the survivors, one of the perpetrators who chickened out and ran and lived, Dawud Rashid Alawali, Saudi, he gets captured by the Kenyan police. John flies over from New York and already there have been two FBI agents interviewing Daoud. They were getting some place, but they really weren't getting that far. Right? John walks in And first thing he does, he says, you need some water? You you want a drink? Did you did you eat today? Did you pray? Are you okay? Yeah. I'm fine. I'm fine. I'm fine. I said, just just relax. Just just just let's have a chat. He didn't beat him with a phone book. He didn't fucking waterboard him. He didn't pull his fingernails out. He wasn't mister tough guy, like all these fucking assholes like Dick Cheney want to believe. Right? All pieces of shit. He talked to him like a human being. Take me through the day. Talk to me. So I went to the hotel and I got my stuff ready. And did you did you call anybody? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I called this number. And he wrote it down. And he gave John the number of the Hadah home in Sana'a Yemen, which was the Al Qaeda switchboard that we and the FBI had no fucking clue existed up until that point. CIA and NSA did because remember, they had been listening to the Nairobi cell and their activity since 1996. We and the FBI didn't know about that number. Speaker 0: The Hadda home wasn't just a communications hub for Al Qaeda. It was the physical home of the father-in-law of Khalid Al Medhar, one of the future nine eleven hijackers. Speaker 1: At the end of 1999, listening to that phone is when the CIA learns and the NSA learns that Kahlilah Medhar is going to be traveling from there to Dubai, and then from Dubai onward to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to meet the summit. Speaker 0: The summit was a meeting of an operational cadre of Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists from around the world. Speaker 1: He was scheduled to travel on or about 01/05/2000. The NSA has the ability, did and probably still has, to get any plane, airplane reservation at once in the world and know about it. Right? We knew his passport number, we had the phone, we had everything. So we knew his travel information, we knew what flights he was taking, who was seat he was gonna in. The CIA arranges for when he gets to Dubai to be secondary. Okay? Not fully questioned, but you know, talk to him a little bit. And then he goes to his hotel room and they arranged to search his room and go in. And when they go in, his passport is there and they take pictures of it and photocopy it. And they send back the imagery and lo and behold, in his passport is a visa to go to United States Of America, issued out of the American consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Speaker 0: According to one recently released court filings, quote, the visas were issued to facilitate an operation run by the Saudis and the CIA spying operation. The station chief in Riyadh at the time was future CIA director John Brennan. The CIA continued tracking Al Madhar to Kuala Lumpur, where he met up with other Al Qaeda associates, including Nawaf Al Hazmi, a second future nine eleven hijacker. Speaker 1: He lands in Kuala Lumpur. They entrust the Malaysia Special Branch, police, to surveil this terror summit in this park in Kuala Lumpur. And so much so to tail them and to surveil them, etcetera. And that information ends up in a communication from Kuala Lumpur Station, CIA, to CIA headquarters to ALEX Station to the computer screen of me and special agent Doug Miller of Washington field office FBI. You have this cable that lays out the meeting Kuala Lumpur, the photocopying of his passport in Dubai, and the learning of the visa to go to United States Of America. Doug Miller gets up from his cubicle of power, comes over to my cubicle of power and says, hey, we gotta tell the FBI about this. I said, Doug, you're damn right. He goes, I'll write up the CIR. What is a CIR? A CIR is what is a central intelligence report. Doug writes it, he sends it to me. I approve it, and it goes to the desk of Michael Ann Casey, CIA officer, analyst. And it sits in her queue, her electronic queue, and it doesn't move for like a day or two. It should move in a fucking few hours. I'll never forget, like it was yesterday. I'll never forget. I'm standing over her. I said, hey, Doug's CIR. She's gotta go to the FBI. He said, no, it's not. I said, why not? She said, because it's not FBI not an FBI matter. It's an FBI matter. It's a CIA matter, and when and if we want the FBI to know, we will tell them, and you are not to say anything. I said, but, yeah, but they got a visa to come to The US. Like, they should know we're handling it, and when we wanna tell the FBI, we will. And I looked at her, and remember she got up, but she put her hands on her hip pointing a finger at me. Now in my naivete, I believed her and I have to live with that every day of my life that I believed her. Speaker 0: So here's a company we're always excited to advertise because we actually use their products every day. It's Merriweather Farms. Remember when everybody knew their neighborhood butcher? You look back and you feel like, oh, there was something really important about that, knowing the person who cut your meat. And at some point, your grandparents are the people who raised their meat so they could trust what they ate. But that time is long gone. It's been replaced by an era of grocery store mystery meat boxed by distant beef corporations. None of which raised a single cow. Unlike your childhood, they don't know you. They're not interested in you. The whole thing is creepy. The only thing that matters to them is money, and god knows what you're eating. Merriweather Farms is the answer to that. They raise their cattle in The US, in Wyoming, Nebraska, and Colorado, and they prepare their meat themselves in their facilities in this country. No middlemen, no outsourcing, no foreign beef sneaking through a backdoor. Nobody wants foreign meat. Sorry. We have a great meat, the best meat here in The United States, and we buy ours at Merriweather Farms. Their cuts are pasture raised, hormone free, antibiotic free, and absolutely delicious. I gorged on one last night. You got to try this for real. Every day we eat it. Go to merriweatherfarms.com/tucker. Use the code Tucker 76 for 15% off your first order. That's merriweatherfarms.com/tucker. As the CIA was blocking the FBI detail from informing the bureau, the hijackers were moving. On 01/08/2000, CIA surveillance teams reported that Ahmed Har had boarded a flight to Bangkok, Thailand. He was accompanied by a man they identified as Al According to the official account, this is where the trail went cold. The CIA placed their names on a watch list and asked that Thai authorities track their movements. Three months later, the Thai government reported back. Al Hazmi had boarded a United Airlines flight to Los Angeles. Almud Har was with him. The two hijackers had arrived in The United States. Speaker 1: But here's my problem with this whole fucking thing and the whole subsequent investigation of nine eleven. You have the CIA then following one man and then two men all over the planet and then eventually even to America. Right? Landing in Los Angeles, California and you don't tell the FBI. Speaker 0: But why would the CIA want to hide the highly relevant and potentially dangerous fact that two known Al Qaeda terrorists had just landed in California? According to a recently released court filing, former White House counter terrorisms are Richard Clark told government investigators that the quote CIA was running a false flag operation to recruit the hijackers. Speaker 2: When Kofra Black became the head of the counter terrorism center at CIA, he was aghast that they had no sources in Al Qaeda. So he told me, I'm gonna try to get sources in Al Qaeda. I can understand them possibly saying we need to develop sources inside Al Qaeda. When we do that, we can't tell anybody about it. Speaker 0: After Clark made that claim publicly, he received an angry from former director of the CIA, George Tennant, who did not deny the allegations made by mister Clark, end quote. But when he reached out to Tennant, his spokesperson denied that the CIA was recruiting hijackers, calling it false rumors and saying, quote, that's categorically not true. He also recalled that the executive director of the nine eleven commission, Philip Zelico, blocked the commission's investigation into the matter at the behest of Condoleezza Rice. Speaker 1: CIA had this delusional grand plan. So the CIA, with their information that they had from this to the Hatter House and their own psychological analysis of everybody in that team, They figured the best way is maybe to recruit somebody who came over from Malaysia. Khalil Amirhar and Nawafahazmi. We kept the FBI at bay because we told Mark Racini and Doug Miller to shut the fuck up. So let's just try to get inside there. And that's what went wrong. That was the grand lie, the grand risk, the grand delusion. You had a duty to protect Americans, and you failed because of your fucking fantastical delusion that Speaker 0: you could recruit somebody inside the cell. The official nine eleven report does not address the CIA's plan to recruit the hijackers. It's not even mentioned. It's possible this is because the CIA blocked nine eleven commission investigators from talking to the agents who participated in the plot. Amazingly, the CIA's Director of Operations kept the CIA operative attempting to recruit the hijackers, referred to as VVV in the documents, away from the Commission's investigators. The consequence of this? The commission's explanation for this story is that the CIA made an honest mistake. The actual language in the report says the CIA played, quote, zone defense, and the FBI had a man to man approach to counter terrorism. The difference in strategies is why the CIA didn't tell the FBI that terrorists had arrived on American soil. Incredibly, the commission investigators didn't ask the CIA director at the time, George Tennant, about the summit in Kuala Lumpur or why the CIA had blocked the FBI from being warned. It wasn't the story they wanted. And that is the crutch of the Speaker 1: matter, and that is the truth, and no one has ever answered those questions. No one has the balls to because they're afraid, because the house will come tumbling down. Speaker 0: So how exactly did the CIA try to recruit the nine eleven hijackers? Well, one amazing thing about their arrival is that they didn't try to hide. The hijackers used their real names while in The United States. They operated in plain daylight. Al Hazmi and Al Midhar lived in San Diego for more than a year before the attacks. They lived openly. In fact, they were so open that Hazmi's name, address, and a home phone number were listed in the San Diego phone book. When they arrived, the hijackers encountered a Saudi intel operative called Omar al Bayoumi. They met at a Speaker 1: restaurant outside of Los Angeles. The CIA utilized the Saudis in the form of Omar Al Bayoumi to spy for them and to gather intelligence. Speaker 0: Before 09:11, the CIA was forbidden from engaging in domestic spying. They used the Saudi intelligence as a workaround. Speaker 1: We'll rely upon the Saudi GID, General Intelligence Directorate, their version of the CIA via Prince Bandar, via their man, Omar Abayumi, to keep us informed as to the Speaker 0: activity of these terrorists. Bayumi's notebook, which was uncovered when British law enforcement raided his home in The UK, contained a drawing of an airplane and mathematical calculations related to flying it. The nine eleven Commission investigators never saw this. At the time, Al Bayoumi had a no show job at a Saudi aviation contractor called Avco. The company's employees say he was one of roughly 50 ghost employees working there at the time, taking the paycheck but never coming to work. According to the classified government documents, an investigator from the nine eleven commission said Al Bayoumi was receiving substantial sums of money from the Saudi embassy in Washington prior to the nine eleven attacks, That the money was being funneled from accounts at Riggs Bank in Georgetown belonging to Haifa bin Faisal, the wife of the Saudi ambassador to The United States. By using the Saudis as a proxy to recruit the nine eleven hijackers, the CIA gave itself cover. If things went wrong, they could push a narrative that blamed the Saudi government for the attacks, which is what they did. Speaker 1: For all intents and purposes, Omar Al Bayoumi was an array an employee of the Saudi Arabian Embassy in Washington, DC in their consulate in Los Angeles, California. Speaker 0: Al Bayoumi convinced the hijackers to move to San Diego. He helped them find an apartment. He served as a cosigner on the lease to that apartment. He paid their first month's rent and deposit. He got them bank accounts. He got them driver's license. He introduced them to many other radical Muslims in the area, including the cleric Anwar al Alaqi. Eventually, al Midhar went home Speaker 1: to Yemen. Khalid al Midhar leaves America for his daughter's birth. Right? And in that time, he loses his passport. He claims he went to Afghanistan. He goes back to Jeddah and gets another passport. And by this time, even prior as I understand it now, the Saudis had identified the terrorists, the hijackers, as potential threats to the kingdom and had put ships in their passports identifying them as a threat. Ahmadar comes back to The United States, I believe it was on 07/04/2001. He's allowed back in, not stopped, not questioned. So here's a guy that the CIA knew came to America, had been in his terror summit meeting in Malaysia in January 2000. Speaker 0: He's allowed to leave and come back. Midhar was able to exit and enter the country at will because he was issued a multi visit US visa. According to a summary of an interview with an FBI agent from Alic Station, quote, Alhamsi and Al Bidhar obtained visas to enter The United States at the American Consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. All told, the vast majority of the nineteen nine eleven hijackers had their visas issued at that consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. At the time, John Brennan was running the CIA station there. Just a few days before Almud Har reentered the country at JFK Airport in New York, the FBI and the CIA held a joint meeting in New York City to discuss the bombing of the USS Cole, which Almud Har was involved in. Speaker 1: And killed 17 soldiers on the USS Cole. Speaker 0: An FBI agent was shown a photograph of Almud Har taken at the summit in Kuala Lumpur. The agent asked the CIA who this man was, but the CIA once again refused to tell them. It wasn't until August 2001 that the CIA finally alerted the FBI. And of course, by then, it was too late. It's not just Mark Rossini who testifies to this. Another anonymous FBI agent told investigators that, quote, he she believed the CIA's operation may have spun out of control. And that they, the CIA, came to the FBI with limited information in an attempt to locate the hijackers without revealing the true nature or extent of their operation against Al Qaeda, end quote. This is the failure Speaker 1: of the nine eleven commission and every other fucking commission that ever existed after that. Speaker 0: But if the CIA was grooming the hijackers as sources, the FBI failed too. When Al Hazmi and Almid Har were in California, they lived for a period in the home of an FBI informant called Abdus Attar. And yet, somehow, the FBI never learned about this. Then, less than a month before the terror attacks, the FBI began an investigation into a French Moroccan national called Zacharias Massawi. He had just moved to Minneapolis from Oklahoma, where he resumed aviation training. After raising suspicions during training, he was arrested on August 16 and charged with immigration violations. But agents were denied permission to search his laptop and the room where he was staying. His exact connection to the hijacking remains unclear even now, but he did receive wire transfers from Ramzi bin Alsheb, who was also sending money to the hijackers. In July 2001, an FBI agent stationed in the Phoenix Field Office sent a memo to headquarters theorizing that there could be a coordinated effort by Osama bin Laden to send individuals to The United States to receive aviation training. For some reason, this memo was never received by headquarters, not until after nineeleven. Why? Possibly because as late as 02/2003, the FBI didn't have a functioning internal email system. Most case files were not digitized, they weren't searchable, and employees did not have access to the Internet. That's true. By September 2001, the bureau's computers were so out of date, it took 12 commands simply to save a document. And in the aftermath of the attack, the FBI distributed photographs of the suspected hijackers via express mail. They didn't have scanners. The Bush administration worked hard for us not to know any of this. They hid it. Many of these details were discovered during the congressional joint inquiry into nine eleven. But when congress released its report, the 28 pages dealing with the hijackers time in Southern California were hidden. They were redacted. When a man called Philip Zelico took over as the Commission's executive director, he reached a secret agreement with the White House to block his investigators from accessing records related to the hijackers until the White House had already screened them. Government documents show that the commission investigator assigned to this topic complained that quote, Zelico limited the number of witnesses that commission investigators could interview. And just days before the report released, Dieter Snell, senior counsel to the commission, attempted to remove most of the details of the Saudi collaboration with the hijackers. Some of the findings were included in the end, but they were buried in the foot notes. The truth is, the official nine eleven commission report sold to the American public and the world for decades as the definitive account of what happened that day is a lie. Nine eleven commissioned Speaker 1: as a cover up. Speaker 0: But how did the Bush administration manage to hijack what was sold as an independent commission? And what exactly were they trying to hide? We'll reveal what we found in the next episode. Thank you for watching the nine eleven files. The next episode drops next week, or you can unlock the entire five part series right now, ad free, by becoming a TCN member. Members also get access to the watch companion, a guide to the timeline, the key figures, the primary sources that we went to to bring you this documentary. You can read along as you watch. Join us today at tuckercarlson.com for the whole series all at once to support our investigative work. We couldn't do any of this without our members. We're grateful for you, so thanks.
RepMTG
Posted - September 5, 2025 at 1:35 PM
Saved - September 6, 2025 at 3:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue that the debate over whether Social Security or foreign spending drives the national debt reflects an America First versus America Last mentality. Americans are taxed heavily for Social Security, which is meant for us, while foreign aid, including significant funds to Israel, burdens our finances. With over $37 trillion in debt, we deserve our Social Security contributions. Criticizing foreign aid isn't antisemitism; it's about prioritizing American needs. Supporting continued funding for foreign countries over our own citizens is a misguided approach.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

The argument of which drives the national debt more, Social Security or U.S. spending on Israel/foreign countries/foreign wars, is fundamentally America First versus America Last. Americans are taxed at gun point for Social Security with 6.2% being forcibly withheld from their paycheck and employers are taxed at gunpoint and forced to match each employees contribution at 6.2% and self employed individuals are taxed at gun point being forced to pay the entire 12.4% on earnings. The government’s failures on Social Security is a separate debate, but Social Security is FOR AMERICANS and Americans deserve every penny. Foreign countries do not deserve American’s hard earned tax dollars and anyone demanding they do should register under FARA. This 2022 estimate of the government’s spending of $8 TRILLION American tax dollars on foreign wars since 9/11, doesn’t include the hundreds of billions for Ukraine, however that $8 TRILLION spent was America LAST and unnecessarily drove America’s national debt. But attacking Ana Kasperian or anyone else with “Jew hatred” for demanding that we stop funding Israel and every other foreign country, and foreign wars, is completely unacceptable and turning many Americans off. It’s absurd really. The reality is Americans have been chained in over $37 TRILLION in debt and Americans deserve their Social Security money they were FORCED to pay! The nuclear armed secular government of Israel is such a successful country that they have less than $400 billion in national debt and provide government funded healthcare and education to their citizens. Daily, Israel is proving that on their own, they are more than capable of destroying their enemies with no one’s help, as they not only destroy their enemies, they also destroy innocent lives. Saying stop giving Israel $3.8 billion dollars a year isn’t Jew hatred or antisemitism, it’s just as simple as saying America can’t afford it anymore and shouldn’t have to continue paying. Instead, defending continued funding of Israel over American’s own rights to Social Security is Israel First and America Last.

@ScottJenningsKY - Scott Jennings

Imagine hating the Jews so much that you can’t tell which of these two numbers is larger: https://t.co/BfBUo5j4Zb

@realDailyWire - Daily Wire

.@AnaKasparian suggests military spending drives debt more than Social Security: @benshapiro: That's not even REMOTELY a percentage of what we spend on Social Security. @ScottJenningsKY: You think Israel is a bigger portion of our budget than Social Security?

RepMTG
Posted - September 2, 2025 at 8:57 PM
Saved - September 2, 2025 at 10:40 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I’m committed to doing everything possible for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein. Including exposing the cabal of rich and powerful elites that enabled this. I’m proud to be signing @RepThomasMassie‘s discharge petition. https://t.co/ODd026a45E

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was the second cosponsor on Thomas Massey's resolution. After reading the entire resolution, I think it's a it's very good. It's it's well written. It protects the victims, and it it provides the transparency that the country deserves and most importantly, the survivors deserve. I will be proudly signing the discharge petition. 'transparency on all levels.' 'this shouldn't have been a battle, and unfortunately, it has been one.' 'a cabal of powerful, rich people as well as the government cover this up and not prosecute these monsters.' 'these are some of the most courageous women I've ever met.' 'So there's information in many different places, and it'll require quite a pursuit.' 'I haven't talked to anybody from the White House trying to undercut it.' 'No. I haven't been asked to not sign.' 'I sat by him in our meeting and listened to his compassion for these survivors.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I Speaker 1: was his I was the second cosponsor on Thomas Massey's resolution. After reading the entire resolution, I think it's a it's very good. It's it's well written. It protects the victims, and it it provides the transparency that the country deserves and most importantly, the survivors deserve. Yes. I will be proudly signing the discharge petition. Speaker 0: Why is it important to do this in addition to what Speaker 1: the oversight committee is doing? Me personally, and I believe in transparency on all levels. And this this shouldn't have been a battle, and unfortunately, it has been one. And, you know, as a as a woman myself, as a mother of two daughters, I can't imagine any young girl or any young woman being victimized and and having government and different people in power and basically a cabal of powerful, rich people as well as the government cover this up and not prosecute these monsters. And so, yes, I'll probably sign the discharge petition, and I would probably vote for Speaker 0: it when I was in this law. Files that the Department of Justice has, you believe, that would would be some sort of smoking gun and that would be some sort of thing that would really is there something specific that you know exists that you were trying to get, or is Speaker 1: this in case there is something? So I think all of us are learning as we go. And from what I learned today in our meeting, it's very lengthy, and there was a lot of information given, gratefully. Those are those are some of the most courageous women I've ever met. These are women that have never truly received justice and have gone out and and named names and done everything they can and they have been failed horrifically. But but there is there's information, but it lies in different places. One place is in the the case in New York. Another place would be lie within the estate, Jeffrey Epstein's estate. Other information would lie within the FBI Department of Justice and that information we are being given thankfully on the oversight committee. We're being given a lot of There's also information in civil cases and trials. So there's information in many different places, and it'll require quite a pursuit Speaker 0: to get it. Have you any White House officials who are trying to cut this discharge petition at this moment? Speaker 1: I haven't talked to anybody from the White House trying to undercut it. No. Have have GOP leaders asked you not to sign it? No. I haven't been asked to not sign. Speaker 0: Speaker Johnson said that discharge petition in case he was essentially moved because of the oversight investigation. Do you agree with that? What do you make of that? Speaker 1: Well, I I just stated right here before, so I'll just repeat that I I personally, as a woman and a mother of two daughters, think that at every level, we should be trying to provide transparency. And we need to do this for victims of of sexual assault and child abuse and sex abuse, and we need to do this for survivors. It needs to happen for these survivors of this cabal of people that allowed this abuse and and kept this abuse going for so long with Jeffrey Epstein and others, but but it needs to be done for survivors all over our country. It just is so I'm on board with every level. It's totally fine with me. To me, it crosses every line, and and I'm happy I was the second cosponsor of Thomas Massey's resolution. I'm happy to sign Speaker 0: the discharge petition. Do you want the speaker to I mean, you could just bring this Speaker 1: to the floor. Right? It's mister Massey's resolution. Said in the I I in in this defense of speaker Johnson, I sat by him in our meeting and listened to his compassion for these survivors. I listened to his questions. I've listened to some of his plans that he has going forward. I do think he's doing a great job there. Just think we need to do everything we can to bring it out. Think that requires a lot of people working together for once for these survivors instead of, there being efforts to that's happened for years to block it.
RepMTG
Posted - August 23, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Saved - August 30, 2025 at 1:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
If America faced relentless bombing due to our government's actions, leading to the suffering of innocent people, I would feel devastated and abandoned if the world remained silent. This is the reality for Gaza, where many innocent lives, including children, are being lost, despite not being involved in the violence. Just as we empathize with victims in Israel, we must also show compassion for those in Gaza. I believe all innocent lives matter equally. As a taxpayer, I oppose funding military actions that contribute to such suffering and refuse to remain silent about it.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

If America was being bombed day and night because of something horrific our government did, and many innocent Americans and American children were being killed and traumatically injured, and we begged for mercy, but the rest of the world said, “Americans voted for their government so they deserve it, their government is bad so all Americans are bad, therefore this is what they get and must be done” And the world was silent to our suffering. And no one came to our aid. And our cities and homes were bombed and turned to rubble. And our infrastructure was destroyed, no farms, no grocery stores, no more organized society. And no one helped our injured and hungry children. How would you feel? What would you think? What would you do? This is what is happening to Gaza where in spite of what we have all been told, many innocent people and children are being killed and they are not Hamas. Does Hamas deserve it? Yes. Do innocent people and children deserve it? No. The innocent people in Gaza did not kill and kidnap the innocent people in Israel on Oct 7th. Just as we spoke out and had compassion for the victims and families of Oct7, how can Americans not speak out and have compassion for the masses of innocent people and children in Gaza? Is one type of innocent life worthy and another type of innocent life worth nothing? For me, I think God sees all innocent lives the same and he loves them all. As a matter of fact, He sent his own son for all people, that’s how much He loves us. America funds Israel $3.8 billion annually for military aid. Actually correction. U.S. taxpayers fund Israel $3.8 billion annually for military aid. That means every U.S. tax payer is contributing to Israel’s military actions. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to pay for genocide in a foreign country against a foreign people for a foreign war that I had nothing to do with. And I will not be silent about it.

RepMTG
Posted - August 28, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Saved - August 29, 2025 at 12:46 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Congress can stop school shootings, here’s how. Stop funding foreign countries and foreign wars and use those tax payer dollars to PROTECT OUR KIDS AT SCHOOL!!! https://t.co/ACPm8qOI5e

Video Transcript AI Summary
Prayers are with the families and victims at the Annunciation Catholic school shooting in Minnesota. I am protected by Capitol Police, but I know what it's like to be a student where a classmate brought guns to school—this happened in 1990 and its root was gun free school zones, a policy pushed by former senator Joe Biden. Congress can fix it by undoing this law and allowing guns to protect our children. How to pay: stop funding foreign wars and foreign aid; Israel receives 3,800,000,000.0; Ukraine receives 600,000,000 in NDAA funds; end gun free school zones and fund a plan to protect our kids. The trans agenda is the most evil agenda on our kids; Protect Children's Innocence Act would codify President Trump's executive order to make it a felony to perform gender affirming care on minors. Bring it to floor for a vote; pass the House; move to Senate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, First and foremost, I would just want to say, my prayers are completely with the families and the victims at the Annunciation Catholic school shooting in Minnesota. This is a horrific murder and tragedy and it should never happen. On that note, I just want to talk for a minute about why it should never happen in America. As a member of Congress, I enjoy a very special privilege when I'm at the Capitol and the Capitol Complex and where my office is. I am completely protected by taxpayer funded armed guards and they have guns and their job and their duty, the Capitol Police, is to protect our buildings, all of the people that work in the buildings, all of the staff in the Capitol and our Congressional Office Building and myself, a member of congress along with all the other members of congress, whether they're republican or democrat, and just everyone there and visitors of course people that are visiting the Capitol. This is an incredible privilege that I have but I can also tell you I know what it's like to be a student in a school where another student brought guns to school and was planning on killing people because that happened in my high school at the very beginning of my eleventh grade school year and this is all the way back in 1990. It happened because our schools became gun free school zones and that was thanks to a former senator Joe Biden. It was a big push in Washington DC to make school zones gun free. Well, forward over the decades and our gun free school zones have produced nothing but mass killings as our children and faculty have been sitting ducks. And this is why they prey on schools because they know that they can quickly and easily kill the most innocent and vulnerable Americans to make their statement and whatever their statement may be. It's sick and it's disgusting and it's unforgivable that it is allowed to continue. Here's what I'm going to say today about this: Congress can fix it. Congress caused the problem years ago by making schools gun free school zones and congress can fix the problem by undoing this law and allowing guns to be used as protection of our most innocent and vulnerable Americans, our children, our most precious resource. That's what our kids are. Our most precious and loved and prized resource. I'll go a step further. Okay, Marjorie, how are we gonna pay for this? Let me tell you how we can pay for it. We can actually put America first. We can put our children first and stop funding foreign wars and foreign aid and use that money that is going to foreign countries, that money should be used to protect our children the same way members of Congress are protected with armed guards at the Capitol. And that is exactly the right and responsible thing to do. Okay, well how much money is that Marjorie? Alright, let's talk about that. Every single year the United States Congress gives Israel 3,800,000,000.0 of your hard earned tax dollars. 3,800,000,000.0 and that money is used for Israel not for your school children to protect them not to protect children that are sitting ducks and vulnerable to any would be killer for whatever their reasons are but but that money goes to Israel. Okay. Well, about other foreign countries? Alright. I'll give you one. We're going to be voting on the NDAA, the National Defense Authorization Act that funds our military. Well, you know what's going to be in that bill? Another $600,000,000 for Ukraine. That's money that could be used to protect children at school, protect our kids with armed guards the way congress is protected. Republicans and Democrats, we are protected with armed guards, but our kids aren't. No, no, no. Congress, every single year, votes and sends money to all these foreign countries, not just Israel and Ukraine, many other foreign countries. We send billions of dollars to Egypt, to Jordan, and the list goes on and on and on. Well, you know, the right thing to do would be for Congress to put into action legislation and vote to end gun free school zones. Not only that, but to move forward with a well funded plan to protect our most vulnerable resources, our most vulnerable citizens, protect our kids the same exact way congress is protected, and stop funding foreign countries. That would be the right thing to do and we have a republican controlled house and senate and we have a president that very much I'm sure would like to see our kids protected and that's that is exactly what America wants And so I'm making this video today to let you know, there are solutions to this problem. And while the left is attacking us for praying, prayer is the first thing that we should do. And so I will pray that our elected leaders will actually put into action legislation and funding to protect our kids once and for all and to end these school shootings. Second, I'm going to tell you about another thing that we should do. The trans agenda is the most evil agenda on our kids. It literally is an agenda that destroys them body and soul. It is horrific and it's a multi billion dollar industry that is killing children. Here's what I think is extremely important. We already have a bill Protect Children's Innocence Act that would codify President Trump's executive order to make it a felony to perform gender affirming care sex changes on minors. That's surgeries, hormone blockers, that's all types of chemicals and medications that they prescribe to children to supposedly somehow change their gender. Should never happen to children. Kids need to be left alone. Kids need to grow up. They need to grow up and this is extremely harmful and we're seeing trans violence over and over again. And so we can pass this bill Protect Children's Innocence Act has already come through judiciary committee. It's completely ready to go. All we have to do is have the speaker and our majority leader bring it to the floor for a vote. Our WIP can whip all the members and get them ready to vote for this bill and it can easily pass the House to move on to the Senate. These are the actions that Congress can take to protect our kids and I think the right thing to do is instead of funding foreign countries and their foreign wars and their foreign causes, the most important thing we can do with all of that money is to protect our kids. Thank you.
RepMTG
Posted - August 20, 2025 at 10:37 AM
Saved - August 21, 2025 at 12:00 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Here is my full interview with Megyn Kelly! Let me know what you think!

@megynkelly - Megyn Kelly

.@RepMTG on Secrets of DC, the Israel Lobby, Jasmine Crockett, and the Future of MAGA WATCH: https://t.co/kwWMjf5bGp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene discusses policy and spending, saying 'Article five security agreements' could be involved in Ukraine, and the American people are against foreign wars. She cites 'we've only passed two of our 12 appropriation bills' and the funding deadline, September 30, describing the process as broken with 'fifteen days' in session. She says 'I am not anti Israel. I'm not anti any country,' but argues for limits on aid, criticizes APAC and CARE for not registering under FARA, and notes '3.8 billion dollars' in funding. She opposed funding for Ukraine, supported Trump, and 'introduced articles of impeachment on Joe Biden on his first day in office,' later being removed from committees. She adds 'over 95% of my campaign money that I raise is small dollar donations under $30' and emphasizes accountability over loyalty to lobbies, while calling America a sinking ship.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everyone. I'm Megan Kelly. Welcome to the Megan Kelly show. Today on the program, congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. This is the first time we have ever met. Since coming onto the national scene in 2019, she has been a lightning rod for the Republican Party and a loyalist to president Donald Trump. However, she's making headlines now over cracks in her support for some of his current stances. Ukraine, Israel, the Epstein files, just to name a few. Congresswoman Green has been involved in some epic fights on Capitol Hill, but whether you like her or not, she does not back down on Fauci, the villain, the trans issue, and so much more. This is gonna be a wide ranging discussion on the current state and future of the MAGA movement and more. Joining me now, congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. Don't miss a moment. Subscribe to this show on YouTube and follow me on Insta, Facebook, and X. So what do we think the effect of the sparring between president Donald Trump and the Fed is going to be? Can the Fed take the right action at the right time? Do we trust in that? Or are we gonna be looking at a potential economic slowdown as they slow roll roll any of their moves as they worry about his tariffs. And what exactly does all of this mean for your savings? You might wanna consider diversifying right about now with gold through Birch Gold Group. For decades, gold has been viewed as a safe haven in times of economic stagnation, global uncertainty, and high inflation. And Birch Gold makes it incredibly easy for you to diversify some of your savings into gold. If you have an IRA or old four zero one k, you can convert that into a tax sheltered IRA in physical gold, or just buy some gold to keep it in your safe. First, get educated. Birch Gold will send you a free info kit on gold. Just text m k to the number 989898. Again, text m k to 989898, and you'll start the process of just getting the four one one on what it means to own gold. Consider diversifying a portion of your savings into gold. So if the Fed cannot stay ahead of the curve for the country, at least you can stay ahead of the curve for yourself. Speaker 1: Thank you, Megan. I'm glad to be here. Speaker 0: Yeah. Thanks for thanks for coming all this way. Let's just start with news of the day because we're taping this on Monday. This is gonna air on Tuesday. And in the Oval Office, president Trump, who's meeting with Zelensky, was just asked about what kind of commitments are we ready to make with respect to our troops in keeping any possible peace in Ukraine because his emissary Steve Witkoff, his envoy had said, we that the security deals are basically being negotiated, which sounds like us. And here's what he said. Your team has talked about security guarantees. Could that involve US troops? Would you rule that out in the future? We'll let you know that maybe later today. We're meeting with seven great leaders of great countries also, and we'll be talking about that. They'll all be involved. Okay. Your thoughts on what if any presence we should be having over in Ukraine? Speaker 1: Right now taping on Monday, so we're just taking what the president just, spoke of in the Oval Office. I think he's talking about potential Article five security Speaker 0: That's what Wittkopf mentioned. Speaker 1: Agreements. Speaker 0: The NATO agreement, which they're not a party of NATO. Speaker 1: Right. Which I'm against. Look, I campaigned all over the country for president Trump, not just in 2024, but literally for years. And, I can tell you right now, the American people are very much against foreign wars, funding foreign wars, sending American troops into foreign countries to protect their borders, their interests, their people. They are appalled that we've spent $200,000,000,000 or more in Ukraine thus far since 2022, and I don't think the American people will be happy about sending American troops with an Article five security agreement and promise to Ukraine. I don't think that's what the American people want. I think they want completely out of it because most Americans are looking at their daily lives. They're looking at their bills, their rent payments. Young people today can't buy a house. They're looking at health insurance, which is a complete scam and a rip off. And they're going, okay, how much more is this going to cost me? So that's my first reaction. Speaker 0: Let's talk about what a guarantee would look like. I mean, if we're guaranteeing, what, the security of Ukraine? Mhmm. So that if there's another Putin invasion down the line, we're required to fight it like it's our war? Speaker 1: Yes. Essentially. So Article five, with NATO means that any, NATO country that is attacked, that means the other countries are are bound in that agreement to respond with defense. And I think it can vary depending on what how the country reacts and and what the defense, aid they give to these other countries. But it's it seems it it doesn't make sense to say Ukraine can never join NATO, but yet here we are, The United States, most powerful country in the world. We are going to give you Article five, a guarantee security agreement. Speaker 0: Like a side deal. Speaker 1: And why do they deserve it is my question. Speaker 0: Why does Ukraine Whether they do or they don't, I Speaker 1: don't wanna give it. Exactly. Speaker 0: You know, that's my position. I don't don't It's my child. Speaker 1: No. I Megan, I fully agree with you, and I think most Americans agree with you. I was one of the only members of Congress that voted no from the beginning to fund the Ukraine war, and I took a very strong position. And and literally, was on my own out of, you know Speaker 0: How'd you see that? Speaker 1: I I just saw it from so my dad was a, combat war veteran in Vietnam. And just growing up with a father that had been drafted and parents that had lived through the Vietnam War, you know, that whole generation, which we love them so much. And knowing so many, you know, of family members and friends that served in, everything from Desert Storm to Iraq and and Afghanistan and all these Middle Eastern wars. And as a member of congress, constantly hearing from veterans that have so many broken issues, whether it's physical or mental with PTSD, and and can't get their needs met at the VA, and then knowing that their suicide numbers are still twenty two a day, I mean, it's just common sense. It's like, we can't do this anymore, and we're broke. America's broke. We're $37,000,000,000,000 in debt, and at some point, we have to start saying no to the rest of the world and and just completely say, no. We're we can't. We we've gotta focus here, or or we're going to implode one day. Speaker 0: Mhmm. It's I mean, the Republican Party has turned on that war and supporting it, but they weren't against it in the beginning. Mhmm. You know, the numbers have fallen. So it's to your credit that you saw that trouble coming right from the get go. And it's not that, like I have sympathy, of course, for the Ukrainian people. I mean, what's happened is terrible. They've had terrible leaders, and Vladimir Putin is not a good man. That's I mean, nobody's gonna dispute that. But not everything can be our problem, And the problem is we had Democrats who were messing with Ukraine and kinda trying to make it our problem for a number of years, which I think led us to feeling some obligation understandably. But at this point, I mean, like you've got these two two stubborn leaders. I don't know what's gonna happen today. I don't I don't have high hopes that Trump's gonna get something done today. Yeah. It's gonna have to stop at some point, because both sides are losing, you know, how many thousands by the week. So I don't how do you see this ending? Speaker 1: I I'm not sure. I I do wanna say I I put a lot of faith and hope in the president because we all win if he's successful in ending it. However, what does America have to continue to commit to these countries in order to end their wars that we had nothing to do with? Even the Ukraine Russia war really started in 2014 under Barack Obama. Speaker 0: Mhmm. It Speaker 1: it everybody thinks it started in 2022. It didn't. It started way back then. And then we can look at the war with Israel and Gaza or Israel and Iran or or whoever in the Middle East. You know, we we are we haven't started those wars either. And then we can say, well, what wars do we pick to get involved in? What about the ones in Africa where Christians are slaughtered all the time? It's just it's like you said, at what at what point do do we say, guys, enough? Speaker 0: Not our problem. Mhmm. I mean, it's like 09:11. Yeah. That was our problem. Speaker 1: 1000%. Speaker 0: That was easy to see. But all of sudden, like, we could we could be extended all over the world at any given time with millions of American troops if we really wanted to be. Yep. So we have to make serious decisions. And we'll we'll round back to Israel, but let me just get to know you first and have you on so did you grow up in Georgia? Yes. Speaker 1: And raised. Speaker 0: Yes. And what what was your family like? Speaker 1: Oh my gosh. Very very down home. My mom's side of family have a very big family. My dad's side of family is not as big. I have one brother. Speaker 0: Older or younger? Speaker 1: Younger. Two years younger. Speaker 0: You were the oldest. Speaker 1: Yes. I'm the oldest. My family, we had no money in the beginning because my dad was truck and truck and ladder construction guy trying to grow the family business from there. So we moved around a good bit. I went to a lot of different public schools growing up in Georgia. Finished up and went to UGA. I was the first person in my family to graduate from college with a business degree, which was, you know, pretty big deal in my family as my parents weren't able to finish college. But yeah, just very normal childhood. Speaker 0: When you graduated, did you have any hopes of becoming a politician? Speaker 1: No, never. Oh my goodness. I'd never wanted to have anything to do with politics. Never even thought of it. Speaker 0: Were you back then, like describe the 20 year old you. Were you feisty? Were you still like a stand up kind of person? Speaker 1: Or No. Speaker 0: What were you like? Speaker 1: No, not at all. I I don't even remember arguing with a waiter in a restaurant. Speaker 0: Really? Speaker 1: Yes. Just very southern. We grow up mild mannered, polite. Speaker 0: Bless your heart is the meanest thing you say. Speaker 1: Well, it has two meanings. There's a sincere bless your heart, and then there's a mean bless your heart. Speaker 0: Oh, I only knew the Speaker 1: second okay. Yeah, no, just and I worked in my family construction business when I was a teenager and then graduated from college and didn't even think of applying for a job anywhere. Went straight back to our family construction business. Speaker 0: Political family? Like, was it a lot of Republican talk or not Speaker 1: Not really. I mean, of course, my parents talked about everything at the kitchen table, which honestly I think helped me so much. They discussed everything at the kitchen table, especially about our business. Whatever the problems were at the time, how much jobs cost, bidding jobs. Speaker 0: And it was a construction business? Speaker 1: Yes. Yeah. Okay. Selling jobs. I mean, really the the structure of running a business, the structure of running a household, you know, household bills. My parents just but they didn't argue. It was not arguing. It was just discussing, which I always I think I learned and benefited from that. And I think all children benefit from that when they hear their parents. But after college, I I I bought my family's construction business. Took me some years to buy them out and help them into retirement, and then away we went, for over two decades. That's that's what I did. Speaker 0: Because I read that you you I don't know if it was you never voted in an election until Trump or you just hadn't voted recently prior to Trump. Speaker 1: The only election I didn't vote in was in 2012. I just couldn't vote for Mitt Romney. Speaker 0: Okay. Why? Interesting. Because back then, Mitt Romney I mean, at least I had a very different image of Mitt Romney in 2012 than I do now. Speaker 1: Mitt Romney, for me, so I'm one of those voters where I have gotta feel inspired to want to vote for someone. You've gotta give me a reason to wanna vote for them. Otherwise, I'm like back then, I would have been like, why am I taking time out of my day? It is is really honestly was my mindset. Speaker 0: Was He did not inspire you. Speaker 1: Very nonpolitical. He did not inspire me. I voted in the first election against Obama. It's not that I like John McCain, but it was against Barack Obama. The next time, was like, well, Barack Obama's gonna win. I definitely don't wanna vote for Mitt Romney. So I was like, why would I bother? Speaker 0: You banged capital dog on the roof? What was it? Speaker 1: I think he just was the wing of the Republican Party I could not stand. And that, for me, was a major turnoff. Speaker 0: You're already in that place in 2012. Speaker 1: Very much so. Speaker 0: So when Trump comes on the scene three years later, were you like, wow. Speaker 1: Yes. I went, this is the first I called him a politician, but he was a candidate. I was like, this is the first politician that makes sense to me because he talked the way my father and my uncles and many men in my life, especially in the construction world, talked. He talked normal. And he talked about, you know, issues that we cared about, like ending foreign wars, putting America first. And he talked about so many of the things that none of the politicians would ever dare talk about because that might not be the right way to talk. Yep. So he was very appealing. Speaker 0: Was it love at first sight? Absolutely. For a politician? Speaker 1: Yes. Love at first sight. Speaker 0: So you didn't you weren't buying into any of the controversies that the media was kicking around back then. You were an early supporter. Speaker 1: I never bought into any of the garbage. Speaker 0: Well, would be important for your future political life, to not buy into garbage being printed by the media. Speaker 1: We didn't buy into it. I didn't buy into it, and a lot of people I knew didn't buy into it. Speaker 0: But you were not yet a politician, we should point out. So this were still running a construction company, you were a business owner and businesswoman? Raising three children. Okay, so how old were your kids at this point? Speaker 1: Oh gosh, so now they are 22, 25, and 27. So Speaker 0: So they're adolescent? Speaker 1: Back in 2016. 16. Yeah. High school and middle school. Speaker 0: Alright. Yes. And, so now at some point, you you decide to throw your hat in the ring and actually run for congress, which is a huge decision. Speaker 1: Yes. So how do you Speaker 0: go from not being really that political Mhmm. To actually running for office? Speaker 1: I know. It sounds crazy. So 2016, I really started paying attention because of Donald Trump. And that led, and it was also the whole world of social media opening up. There was so more so much more information that was outside of mainstream news that was on social media that I found very interesting, and many people did. And, so I I really started paying attention. And it was watching the Republicans in 2017 fail on multiple fronts. Number one, they didn't fight against the Russia hoax. And it was so clear and obvious to me that it was a complete lie, and Republicans basically stood down and allowed Donald Trump just to be pummeled. And it was disgusting to me. I was like, how are they doing this? It just was so repulsive. And then, it was in 2018, they passed the largest budget. I think at that time, it was $1,300,000,000,000. It was a just just bloated budget. They even funded Planned Parenthood. They did all these things that they had said they weren't going to do, and then they flat out did them. And then they did not repeal, the Affordable Care Act. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: And our family, that hurt us in particular because we bought our own health insurance. We weren't it wasn't given to us at some job. And when the Affordable Care Act passed, our family's health insurance went from around $800 a month to over $2,400 a month. It killed us. That was more than our mortgage payment. Speaker 0: Because if you had more than a certain number of employees, you really took it. I remember my brother, who's also a business owner in Georgia, was trying to keep the employees under that number. I can't remember if it was under 50 or under 100, but he was trying not to hire even one more person so he could avoid the exorbitant increases that were coming from Obamacare. Speaker 1: Exactly. It was terrible. Speaker 0: Right. So you're not so what's that doing to the economy? Speaker 1: Killing us. It was killing us. And so all of those problems were were supposed to be the problems that Republicans were supposed to fix. And at the same time, they weren't defending and protecting the president that we had elected and truly believed in his message. And, I'll never forget, it was in, January 2019 watching Nancy Pelosi take the gavel and become Speaker of the House again. Trigger. Yeah. And I was like I mean, I wanna say the f word, Speaker 0: but You can on this podcast. Speaker 1: I did. Was like, fuck it. I'm running for Congress. Wow. Because I felt like they don't have regular people in there that understand. It's like who is in congress that gets it? And so I was so naive though, Megan. I was so naive. I just thought that you could just run for Congress and ask for everybody's vote, and go up there and fix problems. Oh boy, it's been quite a ride since. Speaker 0: Yeah, you've learned a lot. So you were elected in what year did you come into the Congress? Speaker 1: 2020. Speaker 0: Right in 2021, the height of the craziness. Insane. The year America lost its mind. Yes. Now, what I remember back then was you got in trouble for tweets about Sandy Hook or Parkland, like Speaker 1: No, accused that. They laid that on me. But I had always been very vocal against how horrific school shootings are. They're they're horrific. Speaker 0: They're gonna take anything. When you're a young Republican woman, which you're not allowed to be, that's not okay, they're going to throw everything at you. And if they can paint you to be a nutcase, so much the better. They always say nuts are sluts. That's what they do, especially conservative women. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. And they I think they could tell I meant what I was saying. So You're threatening. Speaker 0: You're a good communicator. Speaker 1: So they created this whole new character of me that didn't exist, and I was not prepared for it. I had no media training. I had no nothing. Speaker 0: You hadn't even had a lifetime as an as an argurer. Speaker 1: No. Oh, no. No. No. Never. My first GOP meeting was when I walked into one and said, I'm Marjorie Taylor Greene and I'm running for Congress. It was my first GOP meeting. I had no idea what I was getting into. Speaker 0: Well, I mean that's what we want, right? The whole idea of the founders was like the citizen politician who would come and serve for a limited time and not get bought and paid for and need the job or padding their stock account, Nancy, with access to insider information, she denies it. So that must have been very eye opening for you to start realizing how things work, and you have to do certain things not the way you want, but the way leadership wants. I mean, tell me, what were the eye opening Speaker 1: Oh no, for me, I came in with my hair on fire. I was I was mad at everybody. Everybody. Speaker 0: Because you like you people suck. 100%. Okay. Speaker 1: I was like, this whole city sucks. Like, it's it's destroying us. It's killing us. And and that's but you know what? I still feel that way. Yeah. I literally still feel that way. I wasn't ready for the media blitz. I wasn't ready for what they were gonna do to me. So I so let me tell you, I learned all the hard lessons, and now I'm I'm fine. Speaker 0: Like what? Speaker 1: Just just how they will lie in. So I've learned that when I'm at the Capitol, my staff will will record the entire, whatever questioning there is, whatever interviews I get. Speaker 0: Very smart. Speaker 1: They record them all and we put the whole thing out on social media. So they can't cut up my words. At least I have a way of fighting back. So I learned little tricks like that. Speaker 0: How about intra party? Speaker 1: Okay. Intra party is the most interesting thing. I did I I'm not a leadership person. I don't they can't buy my vote. They can't talk me into it. I'm I'm ease I'm so independent, and it's the best place to be. I went in believing I had to join the Freedom Caucus because I thought, okay, these are where the good guys are, like minded people. Actually, I I I'm not in the Freedom Caucus anymore because oftentimes they end up making a deal or selling out, and I don't think it serves the best interest. Mhmm. However, there are other things that I will I mean, I'll vote for because, like, for example, appropriations. My district needs road project help. They need water help. They need help with police and fire request. So and I think that's what our tax dollars should go towards. And I won't vote for a foreign war. I'm not voting for your foreign aid garbage. I'm not gonna vote for whatever stupid, special interest thing that you're gonna ask me to vote for. But I want our appropriation bills, and I want the money to come back to my district. Speaker 0: Presumably what your constituents want from you. Speaker 1: That's what they want. I think that's what we're supposed to do. But I'm not going to like, I'm mad every single day that we don't have a balanced budget. Like, as a business owner, it makes no sense. Speaker 0: I know. You could never run a business like this. Speaker 1: Oh, no. We'd be homeless people. Speaker 0: Yes. So what happens? Like, was it Kevin McCarthy in 2020? I'm trying to remember who was Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy was, he was our minority leader. Nancy Pelosi was speaker in 2021 and 2022. So you gotta remember, third day on my job was January 6. That was the third day there. I couldn't even find the bathroom. Then, then we had Nancy Pelosi did the second impeachment of president Trump on January 11. That was the same day that my father was having brain surgery to have tumors removed because he had cancer. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: then it was terrible. So I we were not even in session, we had to fly back to vote on that impeachment vote. So I had to leave my mother's side, and she was beside herself because she wasn't allowed in the hospital because COVID. Mhmm. And, so anyways, I had to fly to Washington and vote no on impeachment on that was, like, the second week. Third week there, I got kicked off of all committees. Speaker 0: What'd you do? Speaker 1: They said they just didn't like my remarks, didn't like things I had said on social media. So Nancy Speaker 0: Was it j six related? Speaker 1: Actually, think it was because I had entered no. Yeah. I think it's because I introduced articles of impeachment on Joe Biden on his first day in office. Speaker 0: Oh, okay. Speaker 1: And they got mad. Speaker 0: The other side would never do that. Speaker 1: Oh, no. Yeah. Exactly. Right. So it was just it's full on political warfare, but it doesn't serve the American people. Speaker 0: So how do you because I do wonder how they come to you to try to get you to like sacrifice your beliefs and your personal commitments of how you're gonna be and what you're gonna prioritize. Do they tell you they're not gonna fundraise for you? How do they try to make you go along? Speaker 1: Yeah. Okay, so each member of congress is different. Thankfully, over 95% of my campaign money that I raise is small dollar donations under $30. We're talking about grandma giving me $20, which is the nicest campaign donation I can ever receive. Speaker 0: Yeah. That a lot. It means more than the $2,000 Speaker 1: text message. Oh my gosh, that comes with a handwritten note and a prayer, and you're like, I feel guilty to even take it. It's like such a nice thing. But those are my donors, and they're just sincere Americans, and they're the greatest. So you can't here's how it works. Most so most members of Congress don't have that. They have to raise the the max donations that come from the big dollar donors. And so those are gonna be the very rich party people in their district, but they'll also be, max dollar donors from around the country. Well, in Washington DC, you've got the entire lobbying world, and they work for all the industries that come to Washington needing anything and everything. Speaker 0: What are the most lucrative ones? Like if you wanted to do it a different way, and you just wanted to get donations, like I'm gonna line my pockets so I have an easy reelection, who would you say yes to? Speaker 1: You would say yes to the military industrial base, and you would say yes to Big Pharma. And you would say yes to, Big Farm. You would say yes to to agriculture, you would say yes to the major food industries. Speaker 0: Some of this is explaining why HEGSATH and RFKJ had such a difficult time getting confirmed. Speaker 1: Yes. Because they aren't bought in by those people. Yeah. Those are threatening. Let's say that I'm one of those members and and say that the that's where I'm I'm gonna get my fundraising from. It works out really simple. The lobbyists come, and and they say, hey. Why don't we have a a little cocktail gathering for you off, you know, off the hill because you can't do any fundraising on the hill. Off the hill, we'll bring some people together. You know, we're gonna need your support on the NDAA this year. We're also gonna need you on that farm bill. We're gonna be doing some work, you know, helping out with major grants and studies, for the pharmaceutical companies. And then let's say that somebody like me is like, oh, yeah. That sounds great. Well, they can throw together an hour and a half little cocktail party with with some nice little drinks and some, you know, little cocktail sausages on a stick and a few other things. And then the lobbyists can come in, and then you bring in all the executives and high level people from all those different companies that say the lobbyist represents. They all come in and write max donor checks, which it depends on what they can write for. You can write for a primary, you can write for the general, and you can write for a runoff. And so I think that's a $3,800 max contribution per person for each race in one cycle. Speaker 0: And So you mean I could do, like, 38, 38, and 38? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Oh, I see. Speaker 1: So And Speaker 0: then look get high. Speaker 1: Oh, gosh. Imagine what that turns into and you multiply that by 20 people or 40 people in one room. Yep. Well, they're getting their campaign pockets loaded. Do that a couple times throughout a campaign cycle, and that gives that politician how that need that gives them enough money to get reelected again, and they never had to go home and take a $20 check or even a $5 wadded up, handed in your hand and your hand These Speaker 0: people own you. Speaker 1: They own them. 1000%. And then what is what happens? That translates to, well, we're coming up on appropriations right now. Okay. Megan, I'm I'm gonna make this real simple because this is a process that's really hard to understand. I had to learn it too. September 30, every single year is our government funding deadline, and congress is constitutionally required to fund the government. That's what we're supposed to do. It's our job. So that makes sense. Well, there's 12 separate appropriation bills, and that funds like every different department and section of the government ranging from the Department of Defense to the Department of Agriculture to t s TSA, Border Patrol, ICE, all of this. Really important stuff. Okay. We in the house have only passed two of our 12 appropriation bills. Only two of them. Took us seven months to pass two. We've been out on recess for five it'll be five weeks by the time we go back on September 2. Okay. Get ready for this. Going back in September, we're only going to be in session for fifteen days. Fifteen work days. Speaker 0: Why? Speaker 1: I I I can't even tell you. It makes no logical sense to me. To me, that's a calendar set up for failure. So that means the house has 10 has sorry. Fifteen days to pass 10 more appropriation bills in order to fund the government. And the senate has only passed three out of their 12 appropriation bills, and they have roughly the same amount of time. Speaker 0: Why can't we pass any of these bills? Speaker 1: Here's why. Well, number one, I don't know why. They don't have them finished. And I I don't know I can't comprehend why they don't have them finished, but you have the the pulling and tugging Speaker 0: Behind the scenes Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Of those lobbyists saying, make sure this gets covered. Speaker 1: Yes. And so they're packing in all the appropriation bills with all the crap. Yep. And then they have members like me that are saying, I will never vote for that. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: And so that means that if you're leadership, you likely don't have the votes to pass these appropriation bills because the appropriation bills are so disgusting. Speaker 0: Well, like what we saw with the big beautiful bill, and we got a closer look at how that process played out, but on a smaller scale. Speaker 1: Yes. Okay. Yes. No. And then it's government funding. So what the Nightmare. What all your poor viewers are probably gonna have to watch during September is we won't get appropriations done. Oh, we're gonna have to pass the CR. Speaker 0: Yep. Another I never follow those battles. I I have made it a point in my twenty plus year career as a journalist to not pay any attention to that. Speaker 1: Good for you. Speaker 0: Because eventually it gets the CR gets passed, eventually some agreement is reached, and I spared no agita during the process. I was like I have no tolerance. I like a Congress, I just I feel like we have to move on without them. You know, like Absolutely. They're no good to us anymore. Speaker 1: But it's also the reason why we're $37,000,000,000,000 in debt. Mhmm. It's it's a broken system. It's just a broken system. Speaker 0: So one you didn't mention, but I think is also in there is APAC. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: We should talk about that because that's it's the Israeli, you know, pro Israeli American group. Yes. And they are also very good about recruiting politicians early on in their careers, and they, like those other groups you mentioned, are deep pocketed and would love to buy your vote. And now they're becoming more controversial because people like you are sort of saying, you don't own me. And there are a lot of politicians to my left and my right, and literally to your left and right because the Democrats and Republicans who have been purchased, who now may not have the freedom to speak as openly about their thoughts on this. And I think this audience knows, and I know where you stand too on Israel and all that, but I've been very pro Israel, and I've been very defensive of their right to defend themselves in this nightmare. Sure. Course. And I've been very defensive of American Jews on campuses who are just being harassed, it's ridiculous. Of course. But I have absolutely no skin whatsoever in defending any lobbyist group, including AIPAC. Right. So I would love to know what they do to get the loyalty of politicians, because I will say I have had multiple, multiple reach outs to me, both from friends and from connected people in D. C, begging me to go to Israel with them. And I have said no every time. Usually, I'm just too busy. Have three kids, I have a full time job. Sure. I'm not doing it. But lately, it seems like it's coming to be even more because I feel like there's there's a contingent of people who are worried that they're losing me. Speaker 1: Uh-huh. Speaker 0: And I've said that you're not losing I'm I'm not on Speaker 1: Hamas' side. No. God, no. Nobody's on Hamas' side. Speaker 0: But I it's been a while now that this has been going on. Right. And we're getting more involved with the Iranian bombing and so on. Speaker 1: Sure. Speaker 0: And my own feelings are just, you know, I'm just I'm looking at Israel in a different way right now than I was on 10/08, that's for sure, of '23. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: And I can feel the pressure being slightly ratcheted up, like you're not allowed to. You're not allowed to. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: And I can see people like you, like Tucker, who I know. I know Tucker. I've known him for years, and I've seen you in in your early career. I know you have nothing against Israel. Speaker 1: Oh gosh. No. Speaker 0: Never mind Jews. That's all a lie. But Right. And I see the beatdowns coming. Like, you're not allowed. Like, you're you have to stay right on this lily pad. Yes. And you cannot jump to another neighboring lily pad because it could take you all the way down the river away. So I'm I'm very interested in this dynamic. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I find it fascinating that you're getting asked more and more and more. I've been asked more and more and more, Well, you're a person of very big influence. You've got a big voice. You've got a large audience. They also take a lot of influencers. They invite tons of influencers. Speaker 0: Many of whom have invited me. Like, we're all going together, and will you come? Like, they seem to be coming at me from a number of ways, which only really kind of raises my hackles, like, I'm not going. I'm going to stay right here. I can cover this conflict from here, and I don't wish to be wooed by any side. I actually don't wish to be Speaker 1: Well, do are you persuaded. Have you been invited by any other foreign country? No. No. Okay. That's that's the part. Right? So we have tons of lobbyists and the foreign countries lobbyists that come to, Washington DC. Pretty much every country has some sort of representative. They have an ambassador they send to Washington. It's naturally in their interest. We can understand that. They also are required to register under FARA. It's a law. They have to register as a foreign agent, a foreign lobbyist. That is required. It's extremely important. Here's the here's the difference with APEC. APAC is not registered under FARA, under this law that requires anyone coming to lobby a member of congress or a senator or department of the government and the federal government on behalf of another country. So APAC argues, oh, but we're Americans. Yes. They are Americans, but they are coming to congress and to the federal government asking on behalf of the country of Israel. And I fully agree with you, Megan. We are not against Israel. We are all for their right to defend themselves just as we are for any Jewish person on campus, just as I think in it, like, gosh, we could talk about, young white males in high school that are constantly getting beat up. Yeah. Guess what? They should have a right to defend themselves too, and people should stand up for them as well. We think anybody that is a victim should should be able to defend themselves. However, Israel is the only country I know of that has some sort of incredible influence and control over nearly every single one of my colleagues. And it is it is I I don't know how to explain it. Speaker 0: I I mean, I believe it just given the amount of reach out I've had in this position. And I don't vote on anything. Know? Yeah. And if I had taken money, I could see them really thinking that they had a right to control my speech, or you know my positions, which is why I never have, of course. I mean, what context would I? I don't take advertising from random people. Like I always say, I have Jennie Sell, whose cosmetics are really nice. Speaker 1: We love good cosmetics. Like it can't be Speaker 0: bought by a special interest group, but I can see it because look, no one wants to feel like their position has been bought and paid for, but these politicians, it's they have. And so I can see why APAC would get mad if these politicians then turned on them and didn't support. You know, it's like, what what did my 3,800 times three get me if you're not gonna vote for my issues? Speaker 1: Exactly. Because APAC are Americans, therefore, they can legally donate to members of Congress and senators. So let's talk about how that works. APAC takes every single that they can, Freshman, member of congress, or first year in congress, they take them on a very special trip to Israel in August. That's our August is our recess. It's our it's our, month long district work period. Speaker 0: Dems and Republicans or just Republicans? Speaker 1: They take both of them. Yep. Yes. And they they invite pretty much everyone to my knowledge. So they take them on this trip to Israel. They they I I guess they go on tours all around. I didn't go. So I I don't know what they do there. But they take them on tours. You like the pictures we've seen recently of the speaker and and, other members of congress at the Wailing Wall. Speaker 0: They've all gone. Speaker 1: They've all gone. Speaker 0: I've seen them all. Speaker 1: And they and they wear the kippah. They and even though they're Christians, they're they're not Jewish, but yet they're adorning, Jewish attire, and they're at these Jewish, religious sites. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Then they also meet with different members of the Israeli government. Now we gotta recognize the Israeli government is secular. This is not the biblical Israel. It is the secular government of Israel. And so they meet with their members of of, you know, all throughout their government and the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, meets with them. And so they've done that trip already this month. The the new freshmen and members of our leadership all went, and they they did that trip. Here's what else they do. APAC takes influencers. They take really big people like you. They want you to come over there. They they want to pull you in because they want to pull you on their their side. And and why is that? Okay. For members of congress, every single year annually, Israel receives, and we have to vote on it. It's a yes or no vote, 3.8, billion dollars in funding for Israel. Now, what what does that money mean? Well, they'll say, oh, well, this is for Israel. It's it's it's them to be able to defend themselves. They're the only democracy in The Middle East. Yep. They're constantly under attack. They're surrounded by their enemies who wants to annihilate Speaker 0: That's all true. Speaker 1: Sure. We're not arguing those points. However, let's flip over and look at well, okay. Well, what does this mean? Number one, Israel is doing so well with their economy, and I'm excited for them. This is a big deal. I wish we were doing this good. We're $37,000,000,000,000 in debt. Israel is less than 400,000,000,000 in debt. Less than. If you're an if you're an Israeli citizen, you have government funded health care, and you have government funded college. So why is America having to give Israel $3,800,000,000? If they're doing so great and they're funding health care and college and their government is is their economy is doing so well and their tax revenue is so good that they're less than $400,000,000,000 in debt. Why is dead broke America Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Having to send $3,800,000,000? Well, then they argue back and they go, oh, but this helps America's economy. Well, how how is that? Tell me how it helps. Okay. Well, because we buy money from your defense contractors. Although, guess what? This is really interesting. We give a ton of money to all these foreign countries. And and and if if it's military aid, they're required to buy purchase weapons from our defense contractors. Except Israel is the only one with an exception. They don't have to buy from our American defense contractors. They can use that money to buy from Israeli defense contractors. Speaker 0: Oh, Speaker 1: wow. So there's a funny little a little exception. Just like the same exception that Israel has that this just came from judge McFadden, he just had a ruling that you can burn any flag in The United States Of America and including our own American flag, except you can't burn the Israeli flag in Who said that? Judge McFadden. In Speaker 0: what context? Speaker 1: In his court. It just happened. Speaker 0: Well, that's not gonna be upheld. Speaker 1: It shouldn't be. Speaker 0: That's a violation of the First Amendment, blatant, and it will be struck down as soon as it goes up on appeal. What a ridiculous notion. Speaker 1: Should be. He said in what he wrote is that the Israeli flag, it's an identity erase, and it would be a hell Speaker 0: Yeah. Of a Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Wrong. That's getting struck down. But I see why you're raising it, because I'm picturing look, I have a lot of very close friends who are Jewish, who are very big supporters of Israel, and some faction of them will say like, well, why would you platform an MTG? She's definitely gone anti Israel. And I don't care whether you're anti Israel or not. Any anti Israel people are welcome here. I I Of course. You're allowed to have that view. It's a country that's involved in a war, and it's you don't have to be pro any country in order to come here. But I know you're not. Speaker 1: I'm not anti. Speaker 0: I know you're not. Yeah. But I am also sensing, I discussed this with Charlie Kirk recently, how we're just getting to a place now, the more you tell me I can't talk to somebody or some about something, the more I'm guaranteed going to do it. No one owns me, and I will talk about it, and I will hear you out, and I wanna hear why you're having this kind of experience times 10,000. You know, like my little lily pad, and you're way down there and there. I can see you getting rained down on. And I don't like it, Marjorie. I have to tell you, I don't like it because this is America, you're allowed to have your view. Israel's not America. They're a friend to America, but they're not America. We do have areas in which we have divergent interests, and it is our obligation, and yours especially as a representative, say when you see a divergence you cannot reconcile Right. Where you gotta choose one. Yes. Right? Like, that's what I see happening to you. So what happened? Did you well, like, how did you find yourself in this place? Because you stopped voting for funding for the Israel war? Speaker 1: Yeah. It was easy for me. I'm a business owner. So right now, I feel like I'm I'm part of a board of 435 members, 435 members of congress where we should act like an executive board of a company. And I feel like our company, the United States of America's federal government, is a company that is has sirens blaring, and we are on the verge of literally imploding and going out of business. Speaker 0: Bankruptcy. Speaker 1: Yeah. Massively. I also pay a lot of attention to our economy. Being a business owner in the construction industry, my success of my business, for as long as I've run it rises and fall falls with the economy. And I'm very concerned. The cost of doing business is extremely high. The cost of living is extremely high. Insurance is completely out of control. Car, health, life insurance, business insurance, you name it. Speaker 0: Forget homeowners insurance. That's almost impossible to even find as an offering anywhere. Speaker 1: And if you're 40, forget being able to buy a home. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: They don't even have the hope Speaker 0: of job. I heard you and Tucker talking about how he was saying some 14 friends of his daughter, they all graduated, three out of 14 had jobs. I can see this in my our kids are a little younger than college age now, but our friends, some of them got started earlier, and a lot of their kids are now graduating from college. Great colleges. Smart kids cannot find jobs. Speaker 1: This is so heartbreaking. So for me, I'm not anti Israel. I'm not anti any country. I've turned radically and unapologetically for America, just flat out for America. I'm like, I'm sorry. We don't have time to fund what you're doing. No. We don't. Speaker 0: You guys are doing great. We have the extra. Totally. Yeah. But we don't. Speaker 1: We don't have the money. We don't have the money, and not only do we not have the money, the middle class is turning into the working poor. If you're if you're Yes. If you're a married young married couple today, and you make together over $100,000, you are dead ass broke. You are barely making it month to month. Speaker 0: You retweeted this on Sunday. It's a woman, who's out there on on Twitter complaining about what her life is like given the financial situation she's in. Here it is, top 55. Hey, TikTok. I'm just on here wondering if anybody's feeling the same way. I'm feeling I'm from Illinois, and I feel like the gas prices and the electric bills and the prices of food is just so overwhelming anymore. Like, I'm wondering if anybody else is feeling like they're drowning, and they can't get out. I work overtime, and I cannot get above water. I mean, I literally have no gas for next week. It was either that or get a few groceries to get by. I hit my local food pantries. I'm just wondering if anybody else feels like they're drowning. But, anyway, I hope everybody has a great day. Oh, this poor woman. You can see it. You can see her trying to just keep it together. Speaker 1: Yeah. This but that woman isn't she didn't just lose her job. She's not she's not like she she's not somebody that refuses to work and has Oh, has a job. Working overtime. Yep. She's going to the food pantry, and she's sitting in her car so overwhelmed by the the cost of living and the ability the fact that she can't ever get ahead, she can't even keep up. And she's sitting in her car alone crying, pleading, trying to find some connection with somebody on social media. Megan, those videos are, oh my gosh, a dime a dozen. They're all over social media. Speaker 0: What's the cause of it? I look at that, my first instinct is you should get out of Illinois, and a blue run state, and probably a blue run city. But I don't know that that's the magical elixir. Speaker 1: I can't I mean, and then how hard is that for her? Speaker 0: No, know. But what causes it? I lived in Illinois for five years, and it's like California is completely captured by the left. There are some Republican voters, but they're not represented at all, thanks to gerrymandering. Yep. But that's I'm not sure what they're doing with their money. They collect it in large measure from their taxpayers, and then, like, the teachers union may get it. I don't see it trickling down to children or the working class or the poor. It's not a bunch of social safety net programs that are helping people like that get better. Speaker 1: Mm-mm. Speaker 0: And so I've I've been wrestling with with this for the past the past few years as inflation has gone up and people are really suffering. Okay. We can get rid of president Biden who spends like a drunken sailor and doesn't care. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: K. We did that. It can't be fixed overnight. No. President Trump is also a spender. Yes. Is that the solution, or is it local governance? Like, if you had your magic wand, where would you even begin to help Speaker 1: somebody I with think it's unfortunately, we've we've gotten so far now, we're in the all of the above. So here here's our reality. And this really I mean, we were headed this way even in the Trump under the Trump administration. Like I said, Republicans were big spenders. President Trump spent a lot of money. That CARES Act was 5.2 or 5,700,000,000,000.0, the one that was passed at the very beginning of COVID. That started. But then what the Biden administration did is they spent an insane amount of money. Speaker 0: And they knew they knew we couldn't afford it. Like, it had been too much already. Yeah. They were told, we don't have that 2,700,000,000,000.0 or whatever that one was at the beginning of, well, in early twenty twenty, and he did it anyway. Speaker 1: Right. That was like we had a wildfire going Speaker 0: Late twenty twenty. Speaker 1: Late yeah. We had wildfire going, and then it was like the Biden administration came and just poured gasoline all over it. And then it now it's become a forest fire that's completely out of control. And it's like, where do you start putting it out? Like I said, con so rescissions. We're doing rescissions. That's where we cut u USAID, NPR, CBP. That came from my work on I I chair the DOGE subcommittee on oversight. Yep. That came from our hearings and that work, and we put them into rescission cuts. But, Megan, you wouldn't believe it. We had four Republicans that voted against it. Didn't even wanna cut NPR. Speaker 0: Probably what? Yeah. That's crazy. It's insane. I mean, I love it, I love Doge, but it's teaspoons in the ocean. Right? It's entitlements. If we're gonna do government spending, there's that's the only place to really make up money. Speaker 1: Yep. But then we have like Americans are taxed to death. You you pay a tag tax, you pay a gas tax, you pay, you know, you're taxed on your your sales tax, your property tax. Speaker 0: You there's a death tax. Speaker 1: Death tax. Yes. Speaker 0: You think taxing when you die. Yes. On money you already paid taxes on. Speaker 1: Yeah. So there's I mean, there's taxes on everything, but then what has happened with this insane spending and the national debt? So we not only do we have $37,000,000,000,000 in debt, we pay $1,000,000,000,000 a year in interest on our $37,000,000,000,000 in debt. Here's here's what I'm saying is it is it's out of control. It's like so out of control, but yet Washington is totally tone deaf to this poor woman and and the millions and millions of Americans that are just like her that that are crying in their cars. They're making these videos. God knows if they're crying on social media in their cars, I don't know what they're doing, how they look and feel and emotionally and physically how they're doing in their in their free time. But this is how it's totally failing America. And your kids are not even out of the house yet. My kids are are trying to get started in their twenties, and it's this whole young generations of Americans. And, Megan, here's here's what I think it's gonna produce. If Republicans aren't solving the problem, mainstream Democrats didn't solve the problem, they created the problem, then many of these young people that are voters and should be really starting to engage into the political process and and voting for, our country leaders to fix their problems, they're only gonna turn to radicals. Because it's like Speaker 0: We're seeing it. Speaker 1: They're gonna be like, screw the Republicans, screw the Democrats. They're gonna turn to radicals that are gonna make, like, Mamdani. He he's he's pushing for full blown socialism, if not communism. Speaker 0: Yeah. That was terrifying. And he has huge support among young people. Speaker 1: And he can't pay for all that stuff he's promised. Speaker 0: No. Oh, hell no. Speaker 1: It's all a lie. It's it's like sounds great, and he's putting it to the system, and he's like, I care about you. But it's all it's all a lie. Like, can't deliver it. Speaker 0: Let's be honest. America can still be a dangerous place, and you cannot afford to wait for help. Sure. You could use a firearm. But in today's America, defending yourself with deadly force could have legal consequences. According to FBI data, 99.9% of all altercations do not require lethal force, and that's exactly why many are turning to Berna. Berna is proudly American. Hand assembled in Fort Wayne, Indiana, these less lethal self defense launchers are trusted by hundreds of government agencies, law enforcement departments, and private security companies. Over 600,000 Berna pistols have been sold, most to private citizens who refuse to be victims. Berna launchers fire rock hard kinetic rounds and powerful tear gas and pepper projectiles capable of stopping a threat from up to 60 feet away. No background checks, no waiting periods, and Birna can ship straight to your door. Take responsibility. Protect your future. Visit birna.com right now or your local sportsman's warehouse. That's byrna.com, or your local sportsman's warehouse. Visit now, and be prepared to defend. I don't even know what to recommend to the young people. I mean, they should vote Republican over Democrat, but I don't know that Republicans are their solution either. You know, I for a long time now, I've been feeling like the only answer is outside of government. You know, the future has to be outside of government, has to be with people like Elon or David Sacks or some big brain person who's doing something other than legislating, but the problem is the government continues to bankrupt us. So no matter how well those other guys do or other solutions they come up with, we're still stuck with all this spending, and it is our money. Yes. Well, so but this is all we won't solve it here, sadly, but this is all sort of background to why you do not wanna give Israel or any other country Right. Because you're saying, like, APEC should register under FARA. I I assume you would say so should CARE, the Council on American Islamic Relations. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Anybody, anyone. I don't care who you are. If you are coming and talking to members of Congress, anybody in the government on behalf of another country, even let's go let's talk about, what's that other one? Christians United for Israel. Like, they'll they'll send a, you know, a pastor from my district into my office. Well, they're from my district. They should register Speaker 0: under our So you're saying you don't you shouldn't have to just be foreigners. If your primary purpose is to advance the interests of a foreign government Yes. Or a foreign country, then you should have to register. Absolutely. Would that change their ability to raise money? What would it what would it do to APAC if if that were to happen? Speaker 1: Well, I think that holds holds them accountable under the law. Why do they get a pass? Why does APAC get to take members of Congress, social media influencers, people like you with giant shows, Newsmax, they took Newsmax, they take Fox News people, they take all these people, they take them on the Turning Point USA influencers. They take them to Israel, all expenses paid. Speaker 0: Mhmm. I would never accept that. Never. Speaker 1: Right. Exactly. So why do they get to do that? Why did why does I don't Speaker 0: even go to Mar A Lago. Like, don't president Trump tried to get me to go to Mar A Lago back in 2015. I was like, hell no. I can't. I can't. I I mean, like, I'm in a different business. And Yeah. The politicians, frankly, should see themselves in a different business. Speaker 1: I agree. Speaker 0: They have different people to whom they answer. You know, I I answer to my audience, they have to be able to trust that I'm not bought and paid for by anyone. Speaker 1: I so respect that. Speaker 0: And politicians should be in the same business I'm in in a different way. Speaker 1: Yes. I completely agree. Speaker 0: It's very disheartening. I like, I have nothing against APAC. I don't actually fully understand what they do. I do have something against care. But I agree that like Thank Alyssa. All biases should be out and accounted for Yes. And obvious to anyone who's being offered anything by these groups or asked to attend anything by them or in any way going into business with them. Yep. That just makes perfect sense to me. Speaker 1: It makes perfect sense to pretty much everybody outside of this weird bubble of Washington DC. Speaker 0: So I don't get it then, but like why why are you ostracized? People are saying she's she's not gonna win her next race, you know, like Trump's turned on her, they say. Speaker 1: No, he isn't. Speaker 0: Okay. So what's that about? Like, is that so that's not real? Or No. Is is the GOP turning on you because of this, or is it just loud people who, you know, whose interests are more closely aligned with Israel? Speaker 1: Well, number one, president so Donald Trump is the most attacked, I'd say, human being ever by the establishment media. I would say I'm the most attacked member of Congress ever by the establishment media. I have supported him unapologetically. They would love to be able to say, know, TGN and Trump have split. And they're trying to say that, yet I talk to the president routinely. I text with him. He and I have a great relationship. Speaker 0: You would know if things were not good. Yes. I can speak to that. Speaker 1: Yes. Now here's the other side of it. I, I got elected on my own. I didn't get elected with a Trump endorsement. I beat eight men in a primary who I respected every single one of them. I thought, wow, these guys are great. How am I going to win? But but somehow, I beat the heck out of all of them. So I also have the, I would say, luxury of being very in a very independent member of Congress, and I can disagree with the president. I can. And I have. I already have on multiple fronts. The Genius Act that just recently passed that set up, the whole system for stablecoin. And, I I didn't vote for that bill because, it has a backdoor for a central bank digital currency, which I am largely against. And speaker Johnson didn't allow us to do amendments on that bill to amend that part of the bill, so I said, I'm a no vote. That was president Speaker 0: Trump's You were against the bombing of Iran? You said so? Speaker 1: Yep. I was against bombing, bombing Iran. I'm against paying for Israel to continue to keep bombing Gaza. I think it's a humanitarian crisis. I've called it a genocide, and children are starving to death. I've talked to Christian pastors there that have told me that Christians have been killed and and children are being starving against. I'm a Christian myself. I'm against children Speaker 0: Let's talk about that one. Starving. There there's daylight between us because I I believe that children are starving and hurting in Gaza, no question. But I blame Hamas. I do see what's happening with the Israeli aid and the food trucks, and they get co opted by Hamas, by certain Palestinians, and that's suffering children they can get on a camera over there, the better in their minds. These are not honest brokers. They steal from their own people. They're happy to watch their children starve to death as long as they can put the emaciated baby on camera. It's disgusting. They don't have the same value toward human life that we do, and yes, that Israel has. I'm not saying Israel's perfect. They haven't executed this whole whole thing perfectly, not by a long shot, but when I see what's happening with the starving children, I blame Hamas. Started Well, they Speaker 1: started it. So October 7 was unbelievably horrific. It's unspeakable what Hamas did. I totally blame Hamas. The war wouldn't even be happening if Hamas hasn't done all the things that they've done. Right? Firing rockets into Israel, kidnapping and murdering all these people, suicide bombers over the years. Absolutely. They started this, and it's horrible. I think it's Israel's they they can pinpoint areas, but they're just mass bombing everywhere, and the videos coming out of there are terrible. I'll also say this, Megan. That conflict has been going on way I'm 51 years old. It's been going on way beyond before I was born or any of us were born, I can't even tell you I qualify to solve it. I think God is the only person that Speaker 0: You don't think Maragaza is the solution? Speaker 1: No. No, not at all. Speaker 0: My problem is, when you use the word genocide, like, I don't believe that, but I I also don't have any meaningful video or picture source that I trust. Speaker 1: Yeah. I think I think it's fair to say that no one does. Right? Although I haven't seen the number of, dead children, injured children, starving children coming out of the Ukraine Russian conflict like we've seen come out of the Israel Gaza. Speaker 0: Because of the Palestinians and their amazing propaganda abilities? Like, I think that's the reason. Because the Palestinians put all this on camera and release it. That they're and they make sure that we see this, which is another reason to be suspicious of it. You know, I I don't know what I'm being fed or for what purpose. Yeah. The Ukrainians aren't doing that, and the Russians aren't doing that. Speaker 1: But why not though? Why isn't Speaker 0: Ukraine They're not they're not good at propaganda. Speaker 1: Doing that to each other. See, this is I don't know. Think Zelensky's pretty good at propaganda. Speaker 0: Maybe, but I guess he doesn't have like the the lifelong commitment to it that the Palestinian mean, since I've been in news, the Palestinians have been doing this. Yeah. And they're very good manipulators of media, of cameras. Speaker 1: You've been in the news business much longer than me. Speaker 0: I've I've been burned enough times by them, like I've gone with their numbers over the years, enough times I've been like, oh my god, this is another fucking lie, all they do is make up lies and numbers, and you run with it, and you know, if you're smart, you pay attention, you get burned, then you realize, oh I do not trust the Hamas Ministry of Health. So that's kind of how I've come to it. But I also feel like it's also undeniable that at this point Israel has lost, or most charitably, is losing the propaganda war. And I know why. They're not fighting it as well as Hamas, they never have. And I think people gave them a huge benefit of the doubt in the beginning of this war. It was like, we were still getting bombarded by images and false facts by the Palestinians, it was like, you know what? You can't we're impenetrably on Israel's side. We saw what you did on 10/07. But it's been two years now. Yeah. And I know Israel says, well, we still have 20 hostages left or whatever the Speaker 1: exact 50, numbers but I think they say they think 20 or so. That are alive? Speaker 0: Yeah. But my question is how long with all due respect to the hostages, how long can we justify nonstop war based on the hostages? And it's not that I have no empathy for the hostages, it's just at some point, war must stop, or at least we have to stop funding it at some point. Speaker 1: See, that's where I'm at. We don't need to fund it. That's where I'm at. I can't fix it. I can't even step in there and come up with a solution to repair it. You wanna know why? I can't even relate to it. I I don't live there. I don't live on either side. I certainly do not support Hamas ever, never could, couldn't even defend them in any position. However, I do know all the videos and pictures I've seen of these children. I I do know that, but I can also say Americans don't want to fund this anymore. We just don't. And I also can say Israel and and even Lindsey Graham said it recently. He said, if Israel wanted to commit genocide, they could. And you wanna know what that is? That's an admission by Lindsey Graham saying that Israel is completely competent. Therefore, why are we funding it? Speaker 0: Can I ask you that? Because my understanding is the reason, you know, generally that we fund Israel so much more than a lot of other countries is where we started. You know, that they really are the only democracy in The Middle East. There's only one Jewish state, there's some 30 Muslim nations, but only one Jewish state, so they need to exist. They have no place else to go. It's not an area of the world that's very hospitable to Jewish people. And they are allied with The United States, they seem to share a lot of our values. So like, you watch I mean, is a weird way of looking at it, but I look at what's happening in Dearborn, Michigan, with like the call to prayer five times a day on the streets of an American city, and Muslim immigrants coming over here and having seven children each family. And look at the birth rates in in Europe right now, which are largely nonexistent for white native Europeans, but sky high for Islamic immigrants, many of whom are Islamists. And I think this is like an existential situation here. Is it so bad to have this one country in the middle of of of the Middle East, which is a very rough neighborhood, you know, Syria, Lebanon, that likes us, that will help us, that would, if we ever had a conflict there, help with our military staging that has amazing intelligence that it shares with us, that has amazing abilities to affect, you know, terrorist takedown plans, which is also helpful. So, like, these strategic reasons make sense to me too for our understanding we don't have endless funds to spend some there. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's been the thinking, and that's what Americans have largely believed, and that's how the US government has largely functioned for as long as I can remember. Although if you if you look at Israel, it's you have to recognize in the context of these conversations, not only are they such a strong economic country, not only have they proven that their military can almost they're annihilating their enemy, almost they're going to finish the job, and they're saying they're gonna finish the job. It they also have nuclear weapons. This is a nuclear armed nation. Speaker 0: So you're saying you agree with all that, but we we they got it. Speaker 1: I'm saying America is a sinking ship. We're sinking so badly. Our children have no hope of ever buying a home in the future. We we we pass a budget that is overblown and ridiculous every single year, and we're dragging we're gonna be 40 we're 37 now. It'll be 40,000,000,000,000 in a matter of, who knows, months or year. Speaker 0: With respect to Israel and like the the sense it makes to this alliance, you're you're what I hear you saying is, fine, but they've got it. They're actually not facing an existential threat right now. They've devastated all their immediate enemies all around Israel. So Look at the action. If this were a situation where Israel actually were on the verge of not existing Speaker 1: I think we'd have a different conversation. Speaker 0: Okay. I Speaker 1: get it. Look at the well, we I just go by I'm a I'm a action versus words person. So for me, I'm like, wow. The twelve day war with Iran, which I was totally like, we shouldn't be doing this. Israel's a nuclear armed nation. Look at the outcome there. They did nothing to Israel. They did they did shoot missiles in there, but they did they really do anything to Israel? No. And could they have? No. Israel's a nuclear armed nation. Mhmm. They're surround okay. They're surrounded by their enemies per se, and that's constantly said over and over again, But Israel is a nuclear armed nation. They can nuke these people off the planet if they want to. And they they have proven with their actions what they will do to their enemies to the point of of, like I said, they're starving children starving children in Gaza. There are innocent Christians have been killed. Christian churches have been bombed. They are proving that these 50 hostages that are left and they're demanding back, they are proving that they will turn the entire Gaza Strip to rubble to get their 50 people back. I think that's a country that America can say, they got it. Speaker 0: You got this. Speaker 1: But we're not doing the same thing for our people. That's Speaker 0: Right. Kind of losing our shining city on the hill feel as you look back at our friend from Illinois driving her car, and there are millions more just like her. Speaker 1: Tons of them. They're filled in my district. Speaker 0: If you told me tomorrow that we're pulling all the aid from Israel, I would say, oh good God, who's going to decide where it goes? You know, that's one of my other concerns here. Speaker 1: Like write a check to Americans. Speaker 0: Well, yeah. Speaker 1: I mean, that poor woman in her car, you know, or it's like Trump Speaker 0: Trump actually made some noise about giving a rebate to people from the tariff income. Speaker 1: And everybody was like, thank God. Speaker 0: Real people were like that. Yes. But you know, sort of talking heads who work for like Muckety Muck magazines all of a sudden tsk tsk, use it to pay down the debt, which is another thing. Speaker 1: But Right. Speaker 0: They didn't want that woman in the car getting it directly. Speaker 1: Yeah. No. It's no. The the sad reality is is that so here's what I keep telling everybody in Washington. I'm like, oh, you think we're gonna win the midterms by spending all this stupid money again, not solving everybody's problems? Really, everybody's gonna run out and vote for Republicans again? It's not gonna happen. Mhmm. Think people Speaker 0: Especially when Trump is gone. Speaker 1: He's not on the ballot. That's right. Speaker 0: What happens then? What happens to MAGA in the next presidential election? Speaker 1: I think it's I think we're gonna see all kinds of stuff happen. There's all kinds of levels of MAGA. Right? There's your hardcore based believers, then there's newer adopters that maybe they came on in the last administration later, or maybe they came on this time, like, they're more maha or independents that were like, we're done with the Democrats, that we've gotta find a new way. I I'm gonna tell you, I think those new ones or or a lot of them are gonna fall off. I don't think I don't think they're turning yeah. Without him. And I don't think they're necessarily turning back to Democrats. I think they're just falling off going, who? Speaker 0: Do you think there's anyone in the movement that they could get behind after Trump? Speaker 1: Right now, I think J. D. Vance has got the large lead. That's what the polling shows. But will he come out unscathed over these next Speaker 0: No. No one does. No no vice president will. Speaker 1: But And a lot of people are mad. They want accountability. I want accountability. I'm still pissed off that schools were shut down, that what what they did during COVID Speaker 0: Remember all that? Oh, yeah. What about You're on the right side of all that. All these people Speaker 1: that died from taking a vaccine. Speaker 0: You wouldn't call Doctor. Fauci doctor, which I have to say hats off to you. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: He would he did not behave like a medical professional. He was actually involved, we believe, in causing the pandemic. Yeah. He never took responsibility for it. We believe lied under oath. He did lie under Why should he get the honorific? Speaker 1: He is the man is walking around with a government taxpayer funded pension today, and he got a pardon from a brain dead president. Speaker 0: And tried to ruin the careers of good doctors who were speaking up, like Doctor. Jay Bhattacharya. Speaker 1: Absolutely. He was what, censored or he lost his social media. Speaker 0: Yeah, and they tried to dismiss him as fringe and tamp down his conspiracy theory of let's focus protection, meaning protect the elderly and not the young people. Speaker 1: Right. So today, like when I'm watching the news, yeah, twenty seventeen talking points on the Russia hoax and all the bad guys, Comey, Brennan, and Clapper, and Hillary Clinton, and Obama, and all these people that's being talked about. Here's the reality. None of those people actually physically hurt me. And and for most Americans, especially younger Americans that are like, what happened? Speaker 0: Because True. Speaker 1: If you're 30 years old, that was like, what, almost ten years ago? Speaker 0: Right. Right. You were you were basically still in puberty. Speaker 1: You're going out having a good time enjoying your young adult life, and you were clueless about that stuff. You're like, wait, why do I have to Speaker 0: hate these people? How is this gonna help me? Speaker 1: How did that make my rent cost so much? So but yet what they do know Speaker 0: There's is some things the older people need, Marjorie. Some of us need to see an indictment of someone like a Brennan Speaker 1: I agree. Speaker 0: Or a Tish James. Not everything is for the young people. Speaker 1: I agree. Speaker 0: But I see I take your point. Speaker 1: I I I agree with you. I want accountability for all of that, but I want account accountability more for the people that really hurt American lives. There's this political warfare, and it's happening in the upper elites Yeah. But yet there's nobody fighting it for the regular people. So, I mean, Speaker 0: do you think a J. D. Vance could could unite MAGA with the less MAGA friendly Republican base, you know, like the old Republican base? Mhmm. That's not really the base anymore. Speaker 1: Here's how I see it. So we have the baby boomer generation, which is my parents. I don't know. Is that your parents too? Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So they're primarily Fox News watchers. Right? They have it on all day long under television. Speaker 0: Yes. Totally. Speaker 1: So that's that's the Republican older voting class. And then I'm I'm Gen X. I'm 51 years old. And so you are too. Okay. So we Speaker 0: I'm 54. Speaker 1: Yeah. So we we like barely survived growing up. Right? Speaker 0: We had no parents. Speaker 1: We had no parents. We were outside until the lights came on. And then we'd drink out of the water hose. Speaker 0: The parents had to be reminded that we existed at ten p. M. Service announcements on the TV. Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, Speaker 0: do you remember that? Yes, yes. Speaker 1: It's ten p. M. Do you know where your children are? Speaker 0: Hello, What? How sick is that? That's what we grew up in. No car seats, no seat belts, no baby seats, none of that. Nothing. Love this. No restraint of any kind. Speaker 1: I could go for days on this. Okay. So that's our generation. And so we're at this strange middle point where some of us are still in the establishment Republican mindset, but then there's a lot of us that are really independent and we're like going, hold on now. Like, we're really kind of fault tracking and falling off. And then anybody 40, holy shit. Where are they at? Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: They're like Speaker 0: I don't know which way is up. Speaker 1: They're like yeah. They're lost. They're they're it's an all it's a major dynamic of everything there. And so what I see the future for for the Republican voter, well, no one's gonna going to fill Trump's shoes. He's a billionaire. He is a celebrity. He owns beautiful resorts and hotels and golf courses all over the world. He has a I mean, the connections this man had before he even ran with every celebrity and sports icons. Speaker 0: Nobody will ever equal him on the give a shit meter. No. He doesn't give a shit. Right. You'll never find somebody who is as carefree as he is when it's like saying what they really think. Speaker 1: Well, even if we did, it'll never carry that weight because of who Donald Trump is. Speaker 0: And he he was a lifetime Democrat. Yeah. Who then became a Republican because he had to be one or the other to win the presidency. But he's not really a partisan guy No. Which I think people have found very, very appealing. Yes. He knew how to speak to the right. I mean, truly, to get elected as president as a republican, you need to say you're gonna lower people's taxes Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: That you're going to be pro life Mhmm. And you're gonna protect guns. Right. If you do those three things, even if you are secretly a democrat, you could get elected president as a republican. Speaker 1: I think that's probably a true statement. Speaker 0: So I didn't I think most people on the right did not give two shits whether he really meant it, so long as he actually governed according to it, which he has. But I think in his heart, he's really just not a partisan person, which is part of his appeal. Absolutely. But everybody coming up behind him is. Speaker 1: Oh, very much. And it gave him credibility. Right? Like, oh, I'm I was a Democrat. I was friends with all these people. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: And now I'm burning down their system, and I'm and I'm also he came in at the same time burning down the Republican neo political establishment. Right? He came in America first, make America great again. So he has no one can fill Speaker 0: Like, his what do you mean? What what happened to free trade? That was a Republican pillar. He was like, no. China. Remember, like, raise number one? That's all he said. China. Speaker 1: I know. Yeah. Like, there's so many things you that we love about Donald Trump, but no one will fill his shoes. So what happens to MAGA there? Well, here's something really interesting. The MAGA economy. I love to talk about this. So I came up as a as a Trump rally person. Before I ran, I was like, I'd go to Trump rallies. I love them. These are great. So there's a whole MAGA economy there. There's people that ran food trucks and sold hot dogs, t shirts, Trump hats, any kind of Trump memorabilia you could think of. They they they there's this whole entire economy, whether it it happens at Trump rallies, happens online, happens in local races. You can see them along the, you know, street corners at gas stations. Somebody sets up a tent, and they're selling Trump gear and MAGA hats and all this stuff. It's a it's a Trump economy. Well, guess what? That that is not going to exist under whoever this next Yeah. You know, banner bearer is that cannot fill these shoes. So that's an entire thing that I don't I don't know what happens to it. It's going to fall apart in some way because once it ends, it will fade off. Right? Speaker 0: Well, who is Comey going to do shell art in tribute to on the beach after Forty Seven's no longer with us? Exactly. It's really gonna be tough. Speaker 1: Well, real question is will he be in prison, but Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: He's yet to remain. Speaker 0: Well, maybe his good friend Taylor Swift will help him navigate that. He he seems very inspired by her. Can I ask you about some other things in the news around Yep? I'm dying to ask you about Jasmine Crockett. Speaker 1: Oh, boy. Speaker 0: She seems like a nightmare. Speaker 1: She's she's she's delightful. Speaker 0: What's that like to work against her? Speaker 1: So she serves on Oversight Committee with me, and she's on my DOGE Subcommittee. Great. Yeah. I'll tell you one of the funny things was we we were having a committee hearing on oversight, and it was really late at night. And I was really irritated because I'm always like, why can't we work normal work hours like regular people eight to five? I I don't know what's wrong with congress that we're always doing crazy things at nine, ten, eleven, 2AM under Nancy Pelosi. So we're on the oversight committee, and she is running off her mouth, and I shot at her about her massively huge fake eyelashes. Speaker 0: Yeah. This made news. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I was like, well, you know, I said something along the lines of like, well, you can't read it because of your fake eyelashes. Because she had all the information in front of her, she was like, we don't even know what's going on and da da da da. And, oh my gosh, total explosion. But she She insulted you too. Speaker 0: She said something about a butch body. Yeah. She's nasty too. Speaker 1: Nasty. Which I thought was absolutely hilarious. I mean, I'm I'm you know, I'm like over 50. I work out. I'm like I Speaker 0: thought it was below the belt. I think you could say eyelashes, and you're still it's a personal comment, but it's not as low as what she said. Right. She loves to go low. Speaker 1: Yeah, and somehow Democrats, you know, they're supposed to love all women and and Right. Never body shame and stuff. Speaker 0: How do you even like there's no reaching across the aisle to that. Speaker 1: No. Not at all. Well, she's not a real person. So some interesting things that I've always observed about her is how she treats her staff. She treats her staff like they are just beneath her. Speaker 0: I've read that in the New York Post. Can you confirm? Speaker 1: Yes. Wow. So she always has one of her young male staffers, has to carry her big heavy handbag for her. She just hands it off. It's like, who does that? Speaker 0: Right. What are you who are you? Beyonce? Speaker 1: Right. And then I remember one time on oversight, she called one of her staff over and she whispered something in their ear, and they ran off. And then they came back with this big white fluffy pillow that they put behind her back. And I'm going Speaker 0: And some bonbons? Yeah. Like, what is this? As they fed her grapes and fanned her? Speaker 1: Yeah. So she claims to be, you know, from her people. She she puts on this image that she understands Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: The black American struggle. But let's face it, the girl went to private school. She went on to, you know, I don't know what college and law school. She went to it's like, you she's a complete fake. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: She's as fake as her eyelashes. She's as fake as her hair. She's as fake as her fingernails, and she is such a massive fraud. Speaker 0: Dare I ask about Laura Loomer? Sure. You and she don't seem to get along at all. Speaker 1: No. We don't get along. Speaker 0: So she's I don't know Laura Loomer at all, but I see she's very aligned with she's pro Israel Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: And she's pro Trump Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: And she's very effective at digging and finding dirt on people, especially those who cross Trump. So I'm sure he likes her, you know, for among other reasons, that reason. How did you and she get sideways? Was it the Israel thing? Speaker 1: No. No. I've actually known Laura for years. We actually used to be friends. Back in, like, 2017 and 2018, we were friends, not close friends, but we knew each other. When she ran for Congress the first time, I endorsed her, donated to her, supported her. When she ran the second time, she decided to run she jumped a district, wanted to run against Daniel Webster, who's actually a conservative Republican. And I said, hey, Laura, I don't think you should run against Daniel Webster. I don't think you can beat him. Why don't you jump to another district where there's an open seat, and you'll have a much better shot? Well, she refused. She said no. She would not listen to anybody and ran there, and I was like Speaker 0: What state is this? Florida. Florida. Speaker 1: Okay. So I said, you know, I can't get involved. I'm I'm not going to endorse against against him. I'm I'm gonna stay out. Well, she was furious at me, and then everything kinda plummeted from there. So it actually started back then. But she's not only does she attack me all the time, she attacked Matt Gaetz all the time, she attacked, Brian Jack who used to work for President Trump. She attacks some of the most loyal people to the president, people that are unapologetically America first. Fight those of us that fight the hardest, for some reason, she attacks us the most. Speaker 0: Who's the best ally to you in the GOP? Speaker 1: That's tough. It depends on the issue. So a lot of Speaker 0: concerns Is there another one that comes to mind is not bought and paid for or like not? Speaker 1: Depends on the issue. I would say the president's really mad at Thomas Massey right now, but Thomas Massey is not bought and paid, you know, bought and paid for. And a lot of our voting records are very similar. Mhmm. So I can Speaker 0: A lot of people tell me that they love him. Speaker 1: Thomas Massey's great. And I'll I'll say this. I love president Trump, and I support him, and and I'll fight for him. But at the same time, I absolutely love Thomas Massey. Speaker 0: Yeah. I President Trump is not a Massey fan anymore. Speaker 1: No. He can't stand him. Speaker 0: Behind the big beautiful bill. Speaker 1: Yeah. But think about this. Do you want a United States Congress without Thomas Massey? Everyone needs to think about that. Number one, he was the only member of Congress that voted against the CARES Act, which was the COVID the fifteen days when fifteen days to slow the spread started, which I was overwhelmingly against. I wanted the country to stay open. Thomas Massey was the only one that voted no on that bill and called for a recorded vote and made everybody come in and vote and go on record for him. He did that, and then there's many other things that he's vote against. So in America, do we really want a United States House of Representatives without Thomas Massie? Mhmm. I don't. Speaker 0: We might get one. Right? Because Trump is pushing a primary challenge to him now. Speaker 1: Well, yeah. And it's his consultants that are dumping millions of dollars on Thomas Massie. But guess what? There's been nobody come out to say they'll actually run against him from his district. And it's not working. Speaker 0: Oh, that's interesting. Speaker 1: And the same consultants and donors that are trying to totally murder Thomas Massey are the same consultants and donors that are propping up and trying to get Lindsey Graham reelected, and nobody understands that at all. Lindsey Graham is probably one of Speaker 0: Loomer the most are united on Lindsey Graham. That's another area in which you guys could settle the dispute. Speaker 1: What I'm more concerned about, Meg, is that I'm concerned about the future for our children. And that's that's my main message is whether you like me or hate me, agree with me or disagree with me, what no matter what Apex says about me, no matter what Mark Levin says about me, no matter what somebody on MSNBC or now MS Now Speaker 0: Oh, god. Speaker 1: Says about me, and no matter what some lunatic like Laura Loomer says about me, I'm serving in congress with a singular focus, and that is the future of our kids' generations. Because right now, I don't see a future. Speaker 0: I appreciate what you're doing. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: I I do. Honestly, I you're always welcome here. I I like to have people with whom I have disagreements or who I don't know. Yeah. I just think it's crazy to make mistakes, especially within the Republican Party, uniformity on every issue. And Israel's a very dicey issue. I mean, it's been two years of war with a lot of controversial things that have happened, even if you give Israel the benefit of the doubt on most of it. So there's I mean, like, they and their supporters need to understand they're going to take criticisms, and there are going to be people who who see what they're doing as wrong. Mhmm. And until they get better propaganda artists working for them because honestly, as I say, even I look at this and I'm like, what what picture should I believe? What video should I believe? What believe I cannot trust anything coming out of Hamas, but where's the Israel side where they're showing me everything that really is happening? That I don't Anyway, I appreciate what you do. Speaker 1: Yeah. Thank you, Megan. Speaker 0: Thanks for coming on. Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. Speaker 0: Thanks to all of you for joining us today. We're back tomorrow. See you then.
RepMTG
Posted - August 18, 2025 at 11:24 AM
Saved - August 18, 2025 at 8:04 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I strongly support President Trump in ending mail in voting!! Elections have been stolen for decades with this practice that is ripe for fraud. Save America by saving our elections!!! https://t.co/gN8xCIPFmP

RepMTG
Posted - August 17, 2025 at 6:27 PM
Saved - August 18, 2025 at 11:28 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

My personal thank you to President Trump for making Washington DC safe again!! https://t.co/QdPMmPxGYm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Back in Washington this weekend, the speaker gives a personal thanks to president Trump for making Washington DC safe again with bringing in the National Guard and helping the police here in Washington clean up the streets, asserting a sense of restored safety. "If MTG can walk safely in Washington, DC, that means you can too." They point to the Washington Memorial behind me and to Jefferson, saying they are out here where our beautiful historic cherry trees are in Washington enjoying this gorgeous day. He also mentions enjoying the day as he tours the city. The speaker emphasizes gratitude once more, concluding, "thank you President Trump."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, everybody. I'm back in Washington this weekend, and I just wanna give a personal thanks to president Trump for making Washington DC safe again with bringing in the National Guard and helping the police here in Washington clean up the streets. Let me tell you something. If MTG can walk safely in Washington, DC, that means you can too. So I'll just show you here the Washington Memorial is behind me. And then over here we have Jefferson. I'm out here where our beautiful historic cherry trees are in Washington enjoying this gorgeous day and I just want to say again thank you President Trump.
RepMTG
Posted - August 14, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Saved - August 17, 2025 at 9:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Senator Graham's recent comments about Israel's military capabilities raise serious concerns for me. It’s alarming that America continues to fund a nation capable of such destruction while we face a staggering $37 trillion debt. My priority is America, not foreign conflicts. Politicians seem disconnected from the struggles of everyday Americans, and I’m frustrated that our tax dollars are spent on foreign wars instead of addressing domestic issues. We should focus on peace and humanitarian efforts, not blindly supporting foreign governments. Our resources should benefit Americans first.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Senator Graham confidently says the quiet part out loud, “If Israel wanted to commit genocide they could. They have the capacity to do that.” That is quite a statement and is an acknowledgment that nuclear armed Israel is more than capable of defending themselves, by themselves, and not only defeating their enemies, but completely wiping them out! So why is America funding them and fighting for them??!!! We should not be!! And it is not a matter of supporting either Israel or Hamas, as he suggest, which is ridiculous. It is about supporting AMERICA!!! Lindsey Graham has no children. I have 3 adult children, who are 22, 25, and 27, which gives me a fierce invested interest to be ALL IN to save America. And we are now a nation in $37 TRILLION DOLLARS IN DEBT because of the NON-STOP votes and funding for foreign countries and foreign wars and bloated budgets and pork and waste for over 30 years, which is how long Lindsey Graham has been serving in Washington DC. And the gross negligent consequences of America LAST decisions by MOST politicians in Washington DC has not only chained all of us and our future generations in debt, but eroded the value of our dollar, driven out of control inflation making life completely unaffordable, and is destroying the middle class and turning my children’s generation into the WORKING POOR!!! WHICH PISSES ME OFF!!! The sirens should be blaring in Washington DC with an all hands on deck panic mentality that every single elected member of congress and senator should be working as hard as possible to prevent our inevitable demise. But instead, even after the America First mandate was delivered in the election of 2024, tone deaf Politicians in the swamp still slither up to podiums to deliver speeches that sound like the same Bush era propaganda that has led to 22 veteran suicides a day, every day, from devastating PTSD brought home from pointless foreign wars. I am also completely amazed that Israel and their aligned groups like AIPAC (who is breaking the law by not registering under FARA) takes Members of Congress, and Conservative social media influencers (like TPUSA) on all expenses paid trips to Israel, and welcomes a steady stream of conservative media outlets in order to keep the funding stream going. Can you imagine if Russia did this??? All hell broke loose when Tucker Carlson dared to show clean subways and well stocked grocery stores in Moscow! We can support our allies, but our elected officials should not be funded or going on funded trips for the interest of foreign countries. And God will not pull the plug on us, if we stop funding the secular government of Israel. This is 1,000% false and is the fear mongering tactic used on good hearted American Christians to force us to fund and fight the secular government of nuclear armed Israel’s wars. We don’t believe we go to heaven based on how much money we blindly give and how many bombs we drop on the secular government of Israel’s enemies. Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” John 14:6 Jesus was extremely clear about how we should treat others, especially children. Funding and blindly supporting an ally who is starving children is not going to bring God’s favor on America, as a matter of fact, I’ll argue it will instead bring God’s wrath. America’s intervention should be to stop the war and work for peace and demand the release of the poor Oct 7th hostages, while equally demanding to stop the genocide and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Lastly, American’s hard earned tax dollars should go to AMERICA ONLY!!! If we are going to pull the plug on anything, we should pull the damn plug on FUNDING FOREIGN WARS AND FOREIGN COUNTRIES!!!!!!!

@LindseyGrahamSC - Lindsey Graham

If America pulls the plug on Israel, God will pull the plug on us. I’m not going to let that happen. https://t.co/4pboBftQlO

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am tired of the word genocide. If Israel wanted to commit genocide, they could. They have the capability to do that. They choose not to. Hamas, they would commit genocide in thirty seconds. They just can't. Israel is our friend. They're a democracy surrounded by people who would cut their throats if they could. A word of warning, if America pulls the plug on Israel, God will pull the plug on us. October 7 was an effort to destroy the state of Israel, the largest loss of Jewish life since the holocaust, and here we are almost two years later and Israel's the bad guy. That's ridiculous. Israel is not the bad guy. They're the good guy. The bad guys are the radical Islamists who would kill everybody in this room if they could. When it comes to foreign policy, president Trump has stood up for all the right things, and he stood up against wrong things just like Reagan.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But tonight, it's late at night, Israel is in a fight for their lives. Our friends in Israel are surrounded by people who would kill them all if they could. I am tired of the word genocide. Let me tell you about genocide. If Israel wanted to commit genocide, they could. They have the capability to do that. They choose not to. Hamas, they would commit genocide in thirty seconds. They just can't. And that's the big difference, folks. To people in my party, I'm tired of this crap. Israel is our friend. They're the most reliable friend we have in the Mideast. They're a democracy surrounded by people who would cut their throats if they could. This is not a hard choice if you're an American. It's not a hard choice if you're a Christian. A word of warning, if America pulls the plug on Israel, God will pull the plug on us. And we're not gonna let that happen. So I just wanna end with this thought that president Trump has stood with Israel at the most difficult time since his founding. October 7 was an effort to destroy the state of Israel, the largest loss of Jewish life since the holocaust, and here we are almost two years later and Israel's the bad guy. That's ridiculous. Israel is not the bad guy. They're the good guy. The bad guys are the radical Islamists who would kill everybody in this room if they could. So I haven't lost my vision of right and wrong. When it comes to foreign policy, president Trump has stood up for all the right things, and he stood up against wrong things just like Reagan.
RepMTG
Posted - August 10, 2025 at 11:35 PM
Saved - August 12, 2025 at 1:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2023, the U.S. provided significant military aid to Ukraine, overshadowing the annual foreign aid funding. I feel frustrated that while our national debt soars to $37 trillion, Congress continues to allocate over $70 billion yearly to foreign countries. As a Gen X mother of Gen Z children, I’m deeply angered by how the actions of Washington, D.C. have jeopardized their future. I have nothing against other nations, but my priority is America. I believe we should stop foreign wars and aid, which I see as bribes.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Most recent full year of annual foreign aid funding- 2023, however Ukraine received far more in military aid. Basically the U.S. pays off countries, with some being paid based on how they treat number 2 on the list, which has nuclear weapons. All while we continue the death spiral of national debt which is now $37 trillion. Millennials and Gen Z are seriously struggling financially and Congress refuses to stop sending 70+++ billion/year to foreign countries. My children are Gen Z and I’m Gen X. As a mother and a woman who has absolutely fully lived the American dream, I’m so incredibly angry and disgusted at what decades of America LAST Washington DC has done to young people’s future. Nothing against any foreign country or any foreign people, but I’m America ONLY. I only work for my country, the United States of America. No more foreign wars and no more foreign aid (bribes)!!!!!

RepMTG
Posted - August 11, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Saved - August 11, 2025 at 4:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently looked into Laura Loomer after her attack on Medal of Honor recipient Florent Groberg, who bravely saved his fellow soldiers. Loomer disrespects true heroes, focusing instead on their political affiliations. She uses Groberg to target Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll, showing her willingness to slander even fellow Republicans like Matt Gaetz and myself. Many question who funds her, as she lacks a real job and spreads manipulated propaganda. It's crucial to recognize her reporting as dangerous and misleading, not trustworthy.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

😂😂😂 of course, what a coward. I looked her up after I heard she attacked Medal of Honor recipient Florent Groberg, who risked his own life to heroically save his military brothers from a suicide bomber. What was Hero Florent Groberg’s Loomer crime? Nothing. He spoke at a Democrat convention. But Laura Loomer has ZERO respect or reverence for even the most heroic people in America. Ask any veteran, military member, and American, no one cares about his politics, the man was willing to die to save others from a suicide bomber. Shut up Laura. But there is more. She is using a Medal of Honor recipient as a pawn to attack Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll because they honored him. Laura Loomer will lie about and slander the best people in order to rip apart other Republicans she is trying to destroy. She routinely lies about me. She constantly lied about Matt Gaetz. She lies about those of us who are hard core and UNAPOLOGETICALLY America FIRST. As a matter of fact, 95% of her slanderous attacks are against Republicans. Why does she do that? Because she is not MAGA, she is MIGA. Many people are asking who or what government or what intelligence agency has bankrolled, the twice failed Congressional candidate, Laura Loomer all these years? Because she has never had a real job, she is not legally allowed to own a gun, and she spends 100% of her time trying to funnel her lies and manipulated propaganda to the President of the United States. Many people need to wake up about her reporting. Researching facts and then spinning them into lies to serve her agenda doesn’t make her good or trustworthy. It makes her a liar and it makes her dangerous.

RepMTG
Posted - August 11, 2025 at 2:55 AM
Saved - August 11, 2025 at 12:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
That's just .011% of my district. Stop breaking the law and register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Do NOT enter my office if you're not registered. I ONLY work for the American people as their REPRESENTATIVE in the U.S. House of Representatives.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

That’s .011% of my district. Now stop breaking the law and register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, 22 U.S. Code s 611-62. Do NOT enter my office because you are NOT registered under FARA. I ONLY work for the American people. My job title is REPRESENTATIVE in the U.S. House of Representatives.

@AIPAC - AIPAC 🇺🇸🇮🇱🎗️

5 million U.S. citizens — including more than 9,000 of @RepMTG’s own constituents — are AIPAC members. We are UNAPOLOGETICALLY patriotic Americans who advocate for an alliance that makes the United States safer, stronger, and more prosperous. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I’m fed up with the outright slander and lies about me because I’m UNAPOLOGETICALLY AMERICA FIRST and I am demanding AIPAC register as a foreign lobbyist and I refuse to vote for U.S. taxpayers hard earned money fund foreign aid and foreign wars. I’ve owned my family’s https://t.co/LvwzuFCOui

RepMTG
Posted - August 10, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Saved - August 10, 2025 at 3:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated with the slander against me for being unapologetically America First. I demand AIPAC register as a foreign lobbyist and refuse to support foreign aid funded by U.S. taxpayers. I’ve built my family’s construction business for over two decades and my wealth comes from that, not politics. My financial disclosures reflect my diverse investments managed by a fiduciary. Life was easier before Congress, and I’m proud of my success. I’m committed to ensuring my children can achieve the American dream just as I have.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I’m fed up with the outright slander and lies about me because I’m UNAPOLOGETICALLY AMERICA FIRST and I am demanding AIPAC register as a foreign lobbyist and I refuse to vote for U.S. taxpayers hard earned money fund foreign aid and foreign wars. I’ve owned my family’s construction business for well over two decades and made all of my net worth BEFORE I became a Member of Congress in 2021 and all of my Public financial disclosures show this. My publicly disclosed portfolio is diversely invested through a financial manager whom I’ve signed a fiduciary contract with. My hard earned wealth, that I am thankful and proud of HAS NOT in any way come from politics!!! As a matter of fact I made a hell of a lot more money and my life was WAY EASIER before I entered public life. I am so proud of my company’s success and hard work and there is not anyone who can shame me for being a successful business owner because thankfully I’ve lived the American dream!!! You can go to hell. I am FIGHTING to ensure that my children’s generation is able to do exactly what I have done!!! I’m fighting to preserve the AMERICAN DREAM!!!

@EYakoby - Eyal Yakoby

How does Marjorie Taylor Greene’s net worth go from $700,000 before she joined Congress to $21 million today? A congressional salary is only $174,000 per year. https://t.co/I31Ltz3B0T

RepMTG
Posted - August 9, 2025 at 2:23 AM
Saved - August 10, 2025 at 6:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I refuse to fund the rebuilding of Ukraine or Gaza, and I'm outraged by the suicide rates among veterans. While I condemn the atrocities in Gaza and the events of October 7th, I question how such failures occurred. My primary concern is for my children's future, which feels increasingly bleak due to Congress's misguided priorities. It frustrates me to see colleagues blindly supporting foreign aid without considering the impact on our own citizens. I stand firm in my beliefs, regardless of any labels others may assign to me.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I am not paying to rebuild Ukraine. I am not paying to rebuild Gaza. I am not paying to kill foreigners in foreign wars. And I’m furious that our veterans kill themselves at an avg of 22 a day and live with nightmares whether awake or asleep. I’m not supporting or staying silent about genocide and starvation of children in Gaza. Just like I was not silent about the horrific atrocities on Oct 7th, but I will ask now how did it happen in the first place? And what a terrible security failure. But my number one focus is that my children’s generation has all odds against them and I’m so angry about that every single second of every single day. And it’s absolutely ridiculous that Congress refuses to step off the hamster wheel of America LAST insanity. Almost everyone I work with just keeps pushing the YES button on votes for foreign aid and foreign funding like lab rats that are trained to receive treats. And I’m standing on rock solid ground steadfast in my absolute convictions that all these people are destroying my children’s generations future. They have no chance of realizing the American dream or even getting a single Social Security check at this point. Call me any stupid name you want, I just don’t care.

RepMTG
Posted - August 5, 2025 at 11:35 PM
Saved - August 6, 2025 at 12:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared the story of Edward Coristine, known as “Big Balls,” who bravely defended a woman from a group of teens in Washington DC. His dedication to fighting government waste, fraud, and abuse is commendable, but his heroism in protecting others stands out. We need more individuals like him. It's concerning that Washington DC is one of the most dangerous cities in America, and I support President Trump's efforts to restore law and order there.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

DOGE employee, Edward Coristine, also famously known as “Big Balls” got attacked by a criminal mob of teens in Washington DC as he was defending a woman who was being attacked. Not only does Edward Coristine patriotically work to gut our government of waste, fraud, and abuse, he is also a HERO for sacrificing his own safety to defend a helpless woman! We need more MEN like Edward Coristine!! Washington DC, our nation’s capital, is tragically one of the most dangerous cities in America. I support President Trump in taking over the city to establish law and order!!!

RepMTG
Posted - August 4, 2025 at 3:10 PM
Saved - August 5, 2025 at 10:04 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

End Indian H1-B visas replacing American jobs instead and stop funding and sending weapons to the Obama/Biden/Neocon Ukraine Russia war. https://t.co/u4Q1dX4bo6

RepMTG
Posted - August 1, 2025 at 2:52 PM
Saved - August 3, 2025 at 4:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've noticed that MTG actively challenges lawmakers within her party, establishing herself as a prominent female voice. She recently addressed the Israel-Gaza conflict, questioning the lack of response to what she sees as genocide, expressing confusion over why she's the only Republican speaking out.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

“MTG has also been known for going after lawmakers on her side of the aisle. But in doing so she's carved out a unique position as a top female voice in the party. 'When people, innocent people, are systematically being killed for who they are, is that not the definition of genocide?' Greene told the Daily Mail of the Israel-Gaza war. 'I don't know why I'm the only Republican saying it.'

RepMTG
Posted - July 31, 2025 at 1:58 PM
Saved - July 31, 2025 at 3:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Yesterday, I spoke with a pastor from Gaza about the dire situation there, highlighting the starvation of children and the violence against Christians and innocents. As an American Christian, I find this unacceptable, just as I condemn the violence from Hamas. I question why we continue funding a government that seems capable of systematic cleansing while Americans struggle. I feel anger over the prioritization of foreign wars over domestic issues, which threatens my children's future. I advocate for focusing on American problems and demand that our government serve its people first.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Yesterday I spoke to a Christian pastor from Gaza. There are children starving. And Christians have been killed and injured, as well as many innocent people. If you are an American Christian, this should be absolutely unacceptable to you. Just as we said that Hamas killing and kidnapping innocent people on Oct 7th is absolutely unacceptable. Are innocent Israeli lives more valuable than innocent Palestinian and Christian lives? And why should America continue funding this? The secular government of nuclear armed Israel has proven that they are beyond capable of dealing with their enemies and are capable of and are in the process of systematically cleansing them from the land. Most Americans that I know don’t hate Israel and we are not antisemitic at all. We are beyond fed up with being told that we have to fix the world’s problems, pay for the world’s problems, and fight all the world’s wars while Americans are struggling to survive even though they work everyday. And many of us, even though we are Christians, no longer want to fund and fight nuclear armed secular Israel’s wars especially when it leads to starving children and killing innocent people including Christians. Of course we are against radical Islamic terrorism, but we are also against genocide. You see.. When you have worked your entire life, and will only receive a $1,000 Social Security check, but noncitizens were given $3,500 and more, you are pissed off. When you have worked your entire life, and all your elected federal officials have recklessly spent and sent your hard earned money to every foreign country and every foreign war and NGO to the point we are almost $40 TRILLION in debt and inflation has caused life to be unaffordable, you are pissed off. When you have worked your entire life, and your elected federal government officials refuse to fix the absurd problems that makes all insurance unaffordable, you are pissed off. And for the younger generations, who are trying their hardest to make it in this ridiculous system, they feel hopeless! And that makes me burn with anger. None of this is antisemitic and I, along with millions of Americans, refuse that manipulative label. It’s the consequences of decades of America LAST policies, nonstop foreign intervention, and the American people clearly seeing the truth and suffering. Here is where I stand. No American should face persecution of any kind because of their identity. Not Jewish American. Not Muslim American. Not Christian American. Not White, Black, Asian, Hispanic, mixed American. And on and on. We already have hate crime laws against that and that’s not who we are in America and we have and should continue to work hard to not allow ourselves to become that. My position is this. As a U.S. Representative, I represent the American people. My full focus is on fixing America’s problems. And right now, the problems in America are threatening my children’s future. I consider that a war against my children. Every single person, no matter who they are that continues to enslave my children in debt, continues policies that make their lives unaffordable, and prioritizes foreign countries and foreign wars above my children’s lives and livelihoods, I see as the enemy waging the war against my children and their generation. I will continue to push for world peace because that is the type of world I want for my children and all the world’s children. I want America to put American companies and American jobs first and to protect American land and American homes from foreign consumption. Most importantly, I demand the federal government serve the American people, who pay your salaries. September 30th brings another annual government funding deadline. I sincerely hope Republicans, out on August recess right now, will return in September with a renewed focus to stop funding foreign wars and stop waging the fiscal war against my children and their entire generation.

RepMTG
Posted - July 16, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Saved - July 16, 2025 at 3:46 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I am proudly cosponsoring and will sign the discharge petition. I will never protect pedophiles or the elites and their circles.

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

We all deserve to know what’s in the Epstein files, who’s implicated, and how deep this corruption goes. Americans were promised justice and transparency. We’re introducing a discharge petition to force a vote in the US House of Representatives on releasing the COMPLETE files. https://t.co/Ja1xJ7Hiz1

RepMTG
Posted - July 9, 2025 at 12:32 PM
Saved - July 9, 2025 at 11:05 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I’m accepting apologies now. And I’m introducing legislation to stop weather modification and geoengineering. People have had enough of chemicals manipulating our weather. And the governments and the industries that profit from controlling it. https://t.co/BeaZkfqUUl

@mtgreenee - Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸

Yes they can control the weather. It’s ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can’t be done.

RepMTG
Posted - July 1, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Saved - July 2, 2025 at 3:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm creating a thread to share OBBB contents. So far, I've noted a $9.995 billion allocation for the Moon to Mars program, along with topics on defense funding, Coast Guard, scholarships, border security and deportations, and tax cuts. I'll keep adding more.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Creating a thread today of OBBB contents. I’ll continue to add. $9.995 Billion for Moon to Mars program. https://t.co/UxBSLUDbnZ

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Defense funding: https://t.co/l9JjUc4HfM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Coast Guard: https://t.co/8hr4M1R2ML

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Scholarships: https://t.co/YBc5FSSVUz

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Border security and deportations: https://t.co/0nhhkxE7XN

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Tax cuts: https://t.co/QiiM5cCtVU

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

https://t.co/MbifV7hGBj

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

https://t.co/9MckgD8XbM

RepMTG
Posted - June 24, 2025 at 1:54 AM
Saved - June 24, 2025 at 7:23 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

🚨 MUST WATCH: I joined @MattGaetz to break down the regime change push in Iran and the poison pill AI moratorium buried in the One Big Beautiful Bill. I stand with President Trump, oppose foreign wars, and won’t vote to strip states of their rights to protect jobs from AI. https://t.co/WQrDf2TAtu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene says Americans are tired of foreign wars and regime change, and she believes President Trump is handling the Iranian strikes well by avoiding another "forever war." She awaits a congressional briefing on the operation. Greene says Americans are more concerned about domestic issues like gasoline prices, housing affordability, and inflation. She believes the recent attack was a "saving face" measure by Iran, coordinated with the U.S. Greene identifies herself, Tucker Carlson, and Steve Bannon as the true voice of MAGA, contrasting them with figures like Mark Levin, whom she accuses of being a "never Trumper." She criticizes Fox News for providing a platform for voices favoring foreign intervention. She also opposes figures like Liz Cheney and John Bolton who support foreign wars. Regarding upcoming legislation, Greene opposes the AI moratorium, fearing it would strip states of their rights to regulate AI and protect jobs. She believes this provision was added without President Trump's explicit support and threatens to vote against the bill if it remains. She says that without state regulations, AI could lead to widespread job loss and economic hardship.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining us now, Georgia Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. Congresswoman, you are the torch carrier for the America first foreign policy on Capitol Hill. Tell us what you're seeing and what you're hearing with the president's recent reaction to the Iranian strikes in Qatar. Speaker 1: Well, you know, Washington DC always wants war as usual, Matt. That's, nothing has changed since you left here. But here's the reality, the American people are so sick and tired of foreign wars and regime change. However, I do think president Trump is handling this very well, and I think he has clearly indicated and spoken about this, that he does not want this to be another forever foreign war, one that congress is having to vote to fund like we have been with Ukraine, and he definitely doesn't want to see boots on the ground. And that I am very thankful for, Matt. That's not what we campaigned on. You know, I campaigned on the exact same agenda as president Trump. That's the MAGA agenda, the America First agenda. That's what we promised, and that is exactly what we need to make sure we deliver. Speaker 0: Has the congress had any scheduled briefings on this operation and the level of success? Speaker 1: We're supposed to have a briefing tomorrow. So hopefully, we we find out more. I'm definitely looking forward to that briefing and asking questions. I think it's incredibly important. But I but I've been hearing most of people I've been talking to are regular people. Thankfully, that's who my friends and family are, is regular Americans. And regular Americans care about the price of gasoline. They care about the fact that my children who are 22, 25, and 27, can't afford to buy buy houses. Inflation is is crushing them. They can't afford insurance, and, you know, the the future actually looks pretty bleak instead of hopeful for many young Americans, and that's what makes me so extremely angry. And I think Washington DC, all of us need to get focused very hard on on making sure that we pass the agenda to help these younger generations in the future. And another thing that's very important to recognize, Matt, is last week, no one was worrying about an attack, a terrorist attack on our homeland. That was the furthest thing from their minds. They were thinking about vacations they had planned, concerts they're going to, and just all kinds of summer fun. And that's what Americans Americans should be thinking about. They should not be worrying about a potential terrorist attack, or is this going to be World War three, and and what kind of retaliation will be taken against America. Speaker 0: That retaliation looks a lot now like it looked after the killing of Soleimani, which didn't result in attacks on our homeland. It didn't result in the type of regime change war that some said would cascade. And it seems as though in that case, president Trump was able to executively produce an opportunity for Iran to save face, for no Americans to be harmed. Are are you looking at what you're seeing now with this sort of lackluster response in Qatar being similar to what we saw coordinated after the death of Soleimani. Speaker 1: Yeah. I think you called that just perfectly. It was it was clear this was a saving face, attack. They definitely let The United States know ahead of time. It gave them gave our American military, our great men and women, time to prepare or evacuate the base. That's clearly what it does look like, and I and I hope that's what this is. This needs to be over with. We've gotta get back to work on our campaign promises. We've gotta pass the the tax law. We've gotta make sure that passes. These trade deals that are so important need to be wrapped up and finished because a lot of businesses need to be able to have, great futures, and and trade deals are depending on, you know, depending on that for them. We need the housing industry to boom, we need the construction industry to boom, we need manufacturing to boom, and that's what makes Americans rich, and that's what matters to Americans. So, you know, I'm unapologetically America first. I am not going to say I'm sorry for fighting for our country and our people and the the great people in Northwest Georgia and Georgia's Fourteenth District. And, no matter what kind of pressure and dirty headlines come out against me, there's no breakup between MTG and d j t g DJT. We are definitely, aligned as usual and and will always work for America first. Speaker 0: Oh, there's no question about that, but there are voices that have tried to drive a wedge between the president and some of his most ardent supporters. Mark Levin, who screeches and shrieks over on Fox News occasionally, attacked me. He attacked you. He said we weren't real MAGA because we weren't on board with his idea of a regime change war. Again, president Trump hasn't gone as far as Mark Levin has wanted him to in having a US backed regime change war in Iran. He's done more akin to the Soleimani strike. What what is your reaction to Mark Levin saying we aren't real MAGA because we don't want a regime change war in Iran? Speaker 1: Well, first of all, I can't believe that Fox News allows one of their hosts to go around and and call me names on his social media. That is so unprofessional, and it really speaks to, what kind of media company Fox News is. I think that's horrible. And Mark Levin, obviously, he was a never Trumper from the beginning. He hated Donald Trump. He was totally against him and tried to stop him from becoming president, but yet now somehow Mark Levin is the voice of MAGA? I don't think so. Matt, you and I, Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, all of us have been fighting her hard to stay on these America first policies and stay out of foreign wars. We're MAGA. We're the voice of MAGA, and the people totally agree with us. So, you know, it doesn't matter what Mark Levin actually has to say. People don't watch his show. I don't know anyone that watches his show, and his screeching is absolutely unbearable. But I I think Fox News needs to reel him in, although I I won't expect much out of them. I think I think that's a media company that would love to share, propaganda on their on their network all day long because it brings in the views. Nothing like scaring the American people with another foreign war to get people to watch the news twenty four hours a day. Speaker 0: Yeah. It is disgraceful that Fox News played such an animating role in the other regime change wars. Never really reckoned with that or apologized for it, and it's almost like the exact same scripts. It's almost like they just went and dusted off the old scripts from before the Iraq war changed one letter and now say, Iran, here we go. And in in getting to this core of what is America first, because I think it's one of the important lessons to emerge out of this. Like, when I see Mike Pence and Bill Crystal and John Bolton cheering on the decisions of the administration, I think to myself, like, we didn't go win these elections so that John Bolton could get his his foreign policy. How do you how do you think about some of the reactions you've seen from the people who've been so anti Trump when you've had president Trump's back a 100% with with no break in in vision? Speaker 1: Yeah. I totally I totally agree. I mean, when you have Liz Cheney and and Meghan McCain and John Bolton cheering cheering you on, that's that's not a good thing. And that's pretty much what we've seen, is those neocon voices come back out and they hate Donald Trump. They absolutely hate him, but they love they love this. They love their foreign wars. They love to watch bombs drop and they love to think about regime change more than anyone. But you know, Matt, what's so funny is it's unfortunate. This is my parents' generation, the baby boomers. They've been brainwashed by propaganda on Fox News, and then Democrat baby boomers have been brainwashed by propaganda on CNN. And it's unfortunate that baby boomers truly believe and and think that this is all a good thing, where it's like, you know, I'm generation x, my generation, your generation, and my kid's generation is 100% against this, and we look at this totally different. We're like, we have 37,000,000,000,000 in debt. Yes. And we're we're really sick of the nonstop neocon news networks telling us what we're supposed to care about, and we're, you know, it's just it's gotten to a point where it's really disgusting. But I'm pretty much a lone voice on that issue up here, Matt, and you know why, and and but that's the way it is. I hear from my people back in Georgia all the time. They they are not interested in a foreign war, not one bit. Speaker 0: Well, you you are the voice of millions. And if you're at times the only voice on some of these matters, it's all the more important for people to listen to what you're saying. You've been laser focused on a lot of these domestic priorities that deal with inflation and housing availability. As the the big beautiful bill, continues some revision, it seems, in the senate, what elements of the bill are you paying close attention to and that you want the American people focused on for their delivery to president Trump? Speaker 1: Yeah. Thank you for that, Matt. I love so many things in the bill. I think it's great. It passes tax the tax agenda, energy, and the and the border security. I agree with president Trump. We need to take out the Green New Deal parts of the bill. But the one I'm paying attention to is the AI memoratorium that would take away state rights for ten years to make regulations and laws on AI, and I am so against that. And if the senate does not take it out, people need to understand I get to vote on this again. My vote my voting card, I get I get to use it on the big beautiful bill. And when they send it back, if they still have that in there, that is a poison pill, I won't be able to vote for it. I absolutely will not vote for this bill that and I love the bill, but I am not going to vote for an AI moratorium that destroys federalism for ten years. Speaker 0: Well, no. Tell me why why you think it's important to have states regulating AI. Speaker 1: Because humanity is in danger. AI is projected to replace so many people's jobs, and we saw people's jobs wiped out for the past forty years when manufacturing went overseas, and all the small towns in my district, Matt, they are like graveyards with manufacturing that left years ago, and if AI comes in unregulated, totally unregulated without laws to protect people's jobs, we are going to see poverty and and unemployment and homelessness like we have never seen in our lifetime. And, Matt, there will be no jobs for these people to go get because AI is going to go across all sectors of all kinds of jobs. And I want states to be able to fight to protect their people and their citizens. I want my kids' jobs to be protected. And so I'm I'm not going to go along with whatever lobbyist and whatever big donor, talks someone into shoving this in the bill because this was not the president's agenda, Matt. You and I both know we never saw Donald Trump stand on a campaign rally stage and say, I'm going to take away states' rights for ten years to to regulate and make laws on AI. He never said that. So someone else put this in the bill and I'm not voting for it. So if you know what? It it'll be totally on them. That's their fault. Speaker 0: Yeah. A lot of people don't realize that the first vote the house took was not like the final passage of the bill. Right. That was to get it to the senate to continue to work through these issues. And, I I think it's good that you guys sent it over the senate to keep the momentum going for the agenda. It sounds like I have not paid nearly enough attention to this issue, and I will look into it more. But to help orient us, congresswoman Green, who are the lawmakers who share your view against this moratorium? And then who are the lawmakers who you see advocating for its, for its continuation in the legislation? Speaker 1: I think I have some conservatives on my side, but this was this was a poison pill they snuck in, Matt, in this over 1,000 pages that most of us had no idea was in there. And if I had known, I would have voted no on the first round, but like you said, the the first round was just to get it to the senate so that it can come back and we can vote on final passage. However, it is such a danger. I'm I'm serious. There is no Matt, this is so important because you know this. There is no legislation here in congress to regulate or make lies laws on AI. So there's no federal plan. No plan whatsoever. But this was more of a preemptive attack on the states, to put a ten year moratorium on them. They if they do this, states will not be able to regulate or make any laws no matter what, and the federal level of will only will be the only power that can regulate or make laws on AI. And just imagine, okay, we have the Trump administration right now. We're Republican controlled in the House and the Senate. What does that look like under a Democrat president and under a democrat house and senate? We have no idea. So there I'm just telling you right now, I'm pretty much alone on this with the exception of probably a few more, but we need more republicans to understand that they would they would be destroying people's lives. We will destroy people's lives and and prosperity in the future if we allow if we allow this to pass, and I'm not doing it. Speaker 0: Georgia Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, the absolute America first champion on Capitol Hill. Thank you for the positive contribution you've made to this discussion around these foreign affairs, and we appreciate your great focus on the domestic matters that are gonna define the future of the American economy. Thanks as always for being on with us. Speaker 1: Thank you, Matt. I appreciate it.
RepMTG
Posted - June 24, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Saved - June 24, 2025 at 7:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find the tone of Mark's comments deeply disturbing, reminiscent of the threats I receive daily. I believe he should be held accountable, and I question Fox News for allowing this. My faith in Jesus guides me; he teaches that peacemakers are blessed. Jesus, the son of God, sacrificed himself for our sins and promises peace upon his return. I strive to pray for my enemies, but I remain vigilant. History shows that opposing powerful interests can be dangerous, as seen with a beloved president who was assassinated. I stand for peace and oppose all wars, including those involving Israel.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

This is extremely sick and disturbing. Please read to the end. Mark, you have the exact same tone and language that the psychopaths use that send me death threats every single day. You should be fired from Fox News. And shame on Fox if they condone this. Let me introduce you to my friend Jesus. He says, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the children of God.” Jesus is the messiah. Jesus is the one and only son of God. Jesus was put to death on a Roman cross and died as a one time sacrifice for our sins. Jesus is the lamb of God. You can read about Jesus in Isaiah 53:5-12. Jesus will return one day and the those that did not recognize him will mourn. He will bring everlasting peace to all the Earth and his kingdom will have no end. Jesus also says, “pray for your enemies.” I will do my best to pray for you. But I will be watchful now. There was once a great President that the American people loved. He opposed Israel’s nuclear program. And then he was assassinated. I am for peace. I oppose war including wars Israel wages. Should I feel that my life is in danger now too? What about President Trump who strongly rebuked Israel this morning for continuing to attack Iran?

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

MTG, God are you stupid. And you keep banging your head against the wall. Thankfully, POTUS ignored you and hit the Iranian nuclear sites. You seem very upset about it.  I’m not going away. You’re on my radar.

RepMTG
Posted - June 24, 2025 at 11:33 AM
Saved - June 24, 2025 at 7:22 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Inject this straight into my veins.🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 President Trump on Israel and Iran: "We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the fuck they’re doing.” https://t.co/qrQmDEMQkf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 states that both Iran and Israel violated the peace and ceasefire agreement. Speaker 1 expresses unhappiness with Israel, claiming that immediately after the deal was made, Israel dropped a large number of bombs. Speaker 1 says that they gave a twelve-hour window, and Israel acted within the first hour. Speaker 1 is also unhappy about a rocket that didn't land, possibly shot by mistake. Speaker 1 believes the two countries have been fighting for so long that they don't know what they're doing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Says that Iran violated the peace agreement and the cease fire agreement. Do you believe that Iran is still committed to the peace? Speaker 1: Yeah. I do. They violated, but Israel violated it too. Speaker 0: Are you questioning if Israel is committed? Is gonna Speaker 1: Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I'd never seen before. The biggest load that we've seen. I'm not happy with Israel. You know, when when I say, okay. Now you have twelve hours. You don't go out in the first hour and just drop everything you have on them. So I'm not happy with them. I'm not happy with Iran either. But I'm really unhappy if Israel's going out this morning because the one rocket that didn't land, that was shot, perhaps by mistake, that didn't land, I'm not happy about that. You know what? We have we basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing. Do you understand that? Speaker 0: Do you have do you have to respond to the law?
RepMTG
Posted - June 21, 2025 at 11:17 PM
Saved - June 22, 2025 at 1:58 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war. There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first. Israel is a nuclear armed nation. This is not our fight. Peace is the answer. 🙏

RepMTG
Posted - June 17, 2025 at 12:28 AM
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 12:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I admire Tucker Carlson for his deep love for his family and our country. Since his departure from Fox News, he has gained even more popularity and viewership. He shares my beliefs about the importance of fighting for our nation and its people to ensure a future for our children and grandchildren. I believe that foreign wars and interventions harm America, drain our resources, and threaten our existence. This perspective resonates with millions of Americans who support the America First movement.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Tucker Carlson is one of my favorite people. He fiercely loves his wife, children, and our country. Since being fired by the neocon network Fox News, he has more popularity and viewers than ever before. He unapologetically believes the same things I do. That if we don’t fight for our own country and our own people then we will no longer have a country for our children and our grandchildren. And foreign wars/intervention/regime change put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction. That’s not kooky. That’s what millions of Americans voted for. It’s what we believe is America First.

RepMTG
Posted - June 12, 2025 at 7:56 PM
Saved - June 13, 2025 at 2:22 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

DOGE CUTS PASSED!! Two R’s switched Here are the Republican NO votes to cutting USAID, NPR, and PBS!! Unreal. https://t.co/6PY3bphkVD

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Current NOs on DOGE recision cuts. They don’t want to cut NPR and PBS!!!!!! https://t.co/s4np6gGMMZ

RepMTG
Posted - June 8, 2025 at 1:45 AM
Saved - June 8, 2025 at 2:32 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Is this war on ICE and America being funded by Neville Singham. Is it being funded by China? Was BLM riots funded by China? Is Antifa Communists funded by China? Are the cartels linked? This is an actual war being waged against our country.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Neville Singham - sorry. Real nice guy. Activist who became a billionaire by pushing Chinese propaganda worldwide. https://t.co/OojaZwUgZV

RepMTG
Posted - May 2, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Saved - May 4, 2025 at 6:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I represent the base, and when I'm frustrated with the current direction, it reflects their unhappiness. I campaigned against foreign wars, yet we face potential conflict with Iran and involvement in Ukraine, where funds seem mismanaged. The lessons from Iraq's war remain unlearned, and we should focus on our own resources instead. I advocate for accountability regarding Covid policies and the judicial system's failures. We must prioritize election integrity and address the issues affecting our children, as losing sight of these concerns alienates the base.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I represent the base and when I’m frustrated and upset over the direction of things, you better be clear, the base is not happy. I campaigned for no more foreign wars. And now we are supposedly on the verge of going to war with Iran. I don’t think we should be bombing foreign countries on behalf of other foreign countries especially when they have their own nuclear weapons and massive military strength. And on top of that, now we are told that we have signed a deal for mineral rights in Ukraine, in order to pay us back for the hundreds of billions of dollars that we gave Ukraine and they used for money laundering, sold the weapons we gave them to our enemies, and their leader is a dictator who canceled elections, was involved of the first impeachment of Trump, and campaigned for Biden. Didn’t we learn our lesson when we went to war in Iraq and killed Saddam Hussein because of “weapons of mass destruction?” Did we ever find any? And did any of that oil over in the Middle East make us rich? The answer is no, we are $36 trillion in debt today. So why on earth would we go over and occupy Ukraine and spend an untold amount of future American taxpayer dollars defending and mining their minerals as well as potentially putting American lives at risk and future war? Why don’t we just mine our own rare earth minerals that are tied up on federal lands that the government confiscated years ago? I also campaigned on accountability for the communist and tyrannical acts made by the government during Covid. Yet the Covid vaccine still has FDA approval even though there are millions reported injuries and deaths, and this mRNA vaccine is known to have horrific side effects and DOES NOT STOP PEOPLE FROM CATCHING COVID. And to this day, it’s still on the childhood vaccine schedule, why on earth is this happening? Hasn’t big pharma made enough billions and billions and billions of dollars on this lie? I also campaigned on accountability for all the law fair that was waged against the American people in the past four years. What about all the people that were locked up in jail and the abuse that they went through? And when are those vicious attorneys and judges ever going to be held accountable for the lives they ruined? And I campaigned for an end to waste fraud and abuse of the American people’s harder tax dollars. I believe the DOGE mission is one of the most important things happening today in our government, and yet where are the rescissions that we should be voting on in Congress? And one of the biggest issues in the nation that I have fought for, and early on I was one of the only ones that took a loud screaming stand against, is the evil transgender assault against our children. Most normal people in this country can’t even comprehend how it’s allowed to happen to kids who by law can’t even get a tattoo, drive, or vote. And how did so many of our teachers turn into the predators themselves that groom children with gender lies? This should be an all out effort by Republicans to end this insanity. And look at the extreme nature of our rogue judicial system that is so defiant that there are judges that defy our nation’s laws and block the deportation of literal enemies of the United States of America. Where is the outrage and moral courage to dispose of this treason? Sadly not in Congress. And what about election integrity? This should be the most important issue that the Republicans aggressively fight to protect because without secure elections protected from illegals voting and protections from stealing our votes, the American people have lost their power. When you are losing MTG, you are losing the base. And Trump isn’t on the ballot in the future, so do the math on that.

RepMTG
Posted - April 29, 2025 at 2:24 AM
Saved - April 29, 2025 at 12:03 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

“The judges need to get out of the way, they are the problem.”🔥 People voted for President Trump & his border policies, NOT these judges. https://t.co/4OvHK6EOfj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that judges are committing treason because they were not elected and are obstructing the will of the American people. The speaker states that the American people overwhelmingly voted for President Trump, who campaigned on border security for years. Therefore, the speaker concludes that the judges should get out of the way because they are the problem.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would say, and I'm gonna say what I hear from regular people, that's treason. No one voted for these judges. The American people overwhelmingly voted for president Trump, and he campaigned continuously on border security for for years. This isn't anything new. And that's what America voted for, so I think the judges need to get out of the way. They're the problem.
RepMTG
Posted - April 28, 2025 at 5:08 PM
Saved - April 29, 2025 at 2:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe President Trump has done a wonderful job in his first 100 days! In Georgia, I'm seeing the positive effects of his policies—inflation is down, gas and eggs are cheaper, and hundreds of thousands of jobs are being created. This is the impact of America First policies!

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

President Trump has done a WONDERFUL job in his first 100 days! We are seeing the positive effects of his policies right at home in Georgia. Inflation is down, gas & eggs are cheaper, & hundreds of thousands of jobs are being created. THIS is what America First policies do for our country & my constituents!

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump and his administration are doing a great job, a big difference from his first term. Inflation is coming down to 2.4%, energy costs are down 20%, and eggs are down 59%. Gas is down 59% in Rome, Georgia, and airfare is down 9%. Hartsfield-Jackson Airport had its busiest week over Easter, even pre-COVID. Jobs are up 228,000, and Trump is using tariffs to create a fair playing field for American workers. Tariffs are leveling the playing field for Georgia farmers. Georgians care more about Georgia-based companies and jobs, not importing foreign companies and labor. A battery plant in Cartersville will bring in over 200 families from South Korea. Georgia should support its own companies instead of luring in foreign companies. Georgia should eliminate its state income tax to stop losing residents to Tennessee and Florida.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would it be you or assessment? President Trump is doing a great job and so is his administration, which is a big difference from his his first term as president. There was quite a difference between the administration and and the president himself, but everybody is on board and people could not be happier. What has in Georgia been doing with doctor Trump done for the state of Georgia? Well, I'll show you what he's done for the state of Georgia. This is the economy. We've got inflation is coming down 2.4%. Energy costs are coming down 20%. Eggs are down 59% after the Biden administration killed chickens all over the country. Gas is down 59% in Rome, Georgia. This past weekend, it was $2.66. Airfare is down 9% and I got a great story from Hartsville Jackson Airport. You know what they told me? They said they had their busiest week over Easter, even pre COVID numbers. That means people aren't worried about spending money. And jobs are up 228,000. And most of all, president Trump is using tariffs to create a fair playing field for Americans, American workers, and American workers. If you saw this, you know, weekend, some people seem to be worried about You know what? I those polling numbers came out from the same Democrat networks that have lied about president Trump saying Hunter Biden's laptop talk wasn't real, saying Russia collusion lies, and calling presidential adopts me. So I don't really listen to those fake walls or fake news. I listen to people. And I spent the past two weeks out of this city, thank God, back home with all my constituents and my family and friends who aren't in politics. And you wanna know something? They don't feel that way. It's only people here in this city and a lot of news networks that wanna spread those lies about the husband's time. Are there worries that that tariffs would Well, let me take that as a two part question. Georgia farmers, no. Tariffs are leveling the playing field from Georgia farmers. I talk to them all the time. My district has a lot of agriculture in my district. And as well as all my family in South Georgia. They're tired of having to compete with foreign countries to sell the food that they produce. And thank God President Trump is finally taking that on. The second part of your question is, I'm one of those Georgians born, raised, lived there my entire life. I've also run a very successful construction company in the state. So the Georgia economy and jobs is extremely important to me but I can tell you, I care more and most Georgians care more about Georgia based companies and Georgia jobs. Not importing foreign countries, companies, and importing foreign country labor because here's the reality and the dirty little people don't talk about when those those companies and they receive a lot of benefits and breaks from our state government and county governments to be to be lured into our state to create those pretty little reports that the governor's association shares and competes on job growth. But the reality is they also import foreign labor. And I'll give you an example. The the big battery plant in Cartersville, I was told recently, they're gonna be bringing in over 200 families from South Korea to work in that plant. So that's not really creating Georgia jobs. That's creating foreign jobs that are coming in to Georgia. I think the better way to go about it moving forward in Georgia is instead of luring in Hollywood with tax credits and luring in foreign countries companies to create so called jobs, we should support our Georgia born and bred companies much like my construction company and most small business owners across the state. I a lot of Georgians would be a lot happier. I'll add one more thing while we're talking about Georgia because it's just a personal thing of mine. We need to get rid of our state income tax. Let me tell you, we're losing residents all over Georgia to Tennessee to the North and Florida to the South. Our great state of Georgia, we have the mountains and the sea and we shouldn't be losing our residents. We should be keeping them right here at home.
RepMTG
Posted - April 28, 2025 at 9:48 PM
Saved - April 29, 2025 at 1:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe these individuals do not belong in our country. Those who commit crimes like assault and murder have no place in the United States. I support President Trump and his administration for their efforts to remove these criminals and make America safe again.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

THESE. PEOPLE. DO. NOT. BELONG. IN. OUR. COUNTRY. These illegal aliens who rape our women, assault our children, and murder Americans have NO place in the United States. God bless President Trump and his administration for removing these criminals from our country and for making America safe again!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that if an American commits crimes such as rape, lewd acts in front of a child, sexual assault, fentanyl trafficking, illegal gun possession, child pornography, or sexual offenses against children in a foreign country, they will face severe consequences, possibly the death penalty or life imprisonment. The speaker asserts that Joe Biden and the Democrats were allowing such individuals into the country, harboring and protecting them. They praise President Trump and his administration for arresting these individuals, stating they will face consequences, and that America voted for this action.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rape, lewd acts in front of a child, sexual assault, lewd and lascivious acts against a child, fentanyl illegal gun, child pornography, sexual offense against child, rape, rape of a child, and it goes on and on. Rape and sodomy of a child. If you're an American and you do these things in a foreign country, this you are gonna face serious consequences, probably the death penalty. You'll probably go to a prison and never come out again. This is exactly what Joe Biden and the Democrats were allowing into our country, harboring and protecting these people. God bless president Trump and his administration for rounding them up, arresting them, and they're going to face consequences. And America absolutely voted for this.
RepMTG
Posted - April 9, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Saved - April 10, 2025 at 2:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the FDA has repeatedly misled Americans, leading to a significant loss of trust. They've restricted access to traditional goods while promoting foreign products, such as Chinese vapes and vaccines. It's crucial to restore confidence in the FDA. Under the current administration, I feel they have let Americans down. I believe that with President Trump, we can work towards making America healthy again.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

COVID Vaccines. Baby formula. Nicotine products. Raw milk. Fentanyl. Hemp. The FDA has steered our citizens wrong time after time, resulting in the complete loss of trust from Americans. While this agency has shut down freedom of choice in goods that have supported humans from the beginning of time, they encourage the people of America to consume foreign chemicals like Chinese vapes and vaccines. There needs to be a restoration of trust in the FDA. Under the Biden administration, they failed Americans. With President Trump, they can Make America Healthy Again.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims Americans didn't die under President Trump and criticizes the Biden administration's infant formula failures, where mothers were blocked from ordering safe formulas from overseas. The speaker also criticizes the FDA's ban on raw milk, which is sold in many countries, and accuses the FDA of declaring war on anything natural while allowing chemicals in American foods, contributing to obesity and sickness. The FDA's failure to approve safer nicotine products has led to a dangerous illegal market of Chinese vapes. China has been murdering Americans for years with fentanyl. The FDA has also failed to regulate hemp-derived products and needs to crack down on counterfeit drugs from China. President Trump's executive order ending the de minimis package exemption for low-value imports will help the FDA restrict illicit products from China. The speaker believes Americans don't trust the FDA and that the COVID vaccine FDA approval should be revoked and removed from the childhood vaccine schedule, as children had the lowest hospitalization rates and deaths during COVID.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The good news ladies and gentlemen, the American people are not going to die under President Trump and his great administration because the goal is to make America great again. And as our new administration is getting in place, we have to talk about things that previously happened under the Biden administration. Things like the failures with infant formula, where mothers were desperately seeking formula for their children and were blocked from ordering safe formulas from overseas. That was a complete failure. I can't believe that any time in our country, mothers could not find infant formula on the grocery store aisles and were blocked from getting formula that they much needed for their babies. We can also talk about how the FDA bans raw milk, which is ridiculous. Raw milk is sold in countries all over the world. Countries like England, New Zealand, France, Italy, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Denmark. Raw milk has been here since the beginning of time. And many Americans not only produce raw milk, they'd also like to sell it and many consumers would like to be able to buy it. But the FDA has declared war on anything natural and good. And while it allows many chemicals to be brought in into America, put in our foods, and distributed all over the country, no wonder obesity is at all time highs. No wonder Americans are sicker than most people around the world. The FDA is a failure to approve new nicotine products, are safer than cigarettes, has spawned a massive and dangerous illegal market of Chinese vapes. No one trusts many of the products, especially anything laden with chemicals coming from China because China, after all, has been murdering Americans for years now and Americans are dying every single day from fentanyl that comes in our country. And if China wants to be serious about tariffs and its treatment and unfair treatment against America, the first step they should do is stop sending fentanyl in our country and poisoning our people. The FDA has failed to effectively regulate hemp derived products which the industry themselves desperately wants to be regulated and we heard that in testimony today. The FDA has the authority to crack down on counterfeit drugs, which come primarily from China and infiltrate our legitimate drug supply chain endangering American lives. And we heard our witnesses today talk about how we cannot trust China to give us life saving medications. President Trump's recent executive order ending the de minimis package exemption for low value imports will bolster bolster FDA's ability to restrict the flow of illicit products from China. And I think that's a great thing for every single American no matter how they vote and how they feel about the current president of The United States. The reality today is it is very sad that Americans don't trust the FDA. And I will reiterate again for the many millions and millions of Americans who are still angry and want accountability and they deserve it for being forced to take a vaccine they should have never have been forced to take. And all the Americans that suffer from side effects and lost loved ones from a vaccine that should lose its FDA approval. And I'm saying that that is my own opinion. I believe that the FDA approval of COVID vaccines should be revoked and that they should be taken off the childhood vaccine schedule. Children don't need a COVID vaccine. Children were one of the healthiest and had the lowest hospitalization rates and deaths during COVID. After all, our kids are resilient and they shouldn't be forced and be injected with manufactured vaccines that their parents disagree with. I thank everyone, for for tuning into this hearing today. I thank our witnesses for being here, and thank you for your testimony. With
RepMTG
Posted - April 9, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Saved - April 10, 2025 at 3:13 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

COVID vaccines were approved in days instead of years. 1.6M VAERS reports with 38K deaths and the media stays silent. Natural immunity works. The COVID vaccines are deadly. The American people deserve to know the truth. FDA approval of MRNA COVID vaccines should be repealed. https://t.co/aW7PmcWbij

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses the issue of vaccines, claiming the FDA has lost the trust of Americans. Autism rates are cited, stating that in the 1980s, it was 1 in 10,000, but a recent Children's Health Defense study indicates it's now 1 in 33 among children ages 5 to 8. Parents are said to point to vaccines as a cause, but are dismissed. The speaker criticizes the emergency use authorization of COVID vaccines, alleging the process took only days compared to the typical 10-15 years for vaccine development. VAERS reports are referenced, citing 1,662,426 reports, including 38,541 deaths, 220,494 hospitalizations, and other adverse events. The speaker contrasts this with the alleged dismissal of Ivermectin as "horse paste," despite its effectiveness against COVID. The speaker asks if the addressee objected to the removal of Doctors Gruber and Krausz for opposing mandated booster shots, to which the addressee said no. The speaker claims vaccinated and boosted individuals keep getting and spreading COVID-19, while those with natural immunity do not.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I'm going to speak on behalf of a community of people that here in America that largely get ignored on an extremely important issue. And that's the issue of vaccines. And while we're talking about the FDA losing the trust of Americans, there's a very important reason why for that. And I have to recognize autism rates. Now, anytime you mess with people's children, this this is getting to the heart of a family. And, you know, in the nineteen eighties, '1 to '4 out of every '10 thousand individuals had autism. Twenty years ago, it was one in one hundred and fifty. And just recently, the rate has been said to be one in thirty six. But today, there was a study that just came out of twelve million children ages five to eight. And it has been released by the Children's Health Defense that the autism rate is now one in thirty three. I mean, we're talking about something that cannot be ignored anymore. This is a crisis and people are losing their children. They're watching their children go from being happy, active, babbling, growing, reaching milestones to completely disappearing. Completely disappearing. And parents over and over and over again point to vaccines. And they called conspiracy theorists. They're dismissed. And they are completely ignored. And this cannot be ignored anymore. This is a crisis and we are losing our children. And this cannot be allowed. Let's talk about another reason why the FDA has lost all trust from Americans and we can talk about the COVID vaccines. Emergency use authorization was given for these vaccines. And the FDA took approximately twenty one days to give it for the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine. Moderna, the Emergency Youth Authorization was given in eighteen days. Eighteen days. And then for Johnson and Johnson, it was given in twenty three days. Now this comes after typically vaccine development approval takes ten to fifteen years. But for these vaccines for COVID, it was given the emergency use was given in a matter of days and then full approval was given in months. Now what has been the result of that? Another thing in people that have been ignored. These are the VAERS reports. Now, there's 1,662,426 VAERS reports. And it is listed here that there are 38,541 deaths, two hundred and twenty thousand four hundred and ninety four hospitalizations, one hundred and fifty six thousand five hundred and twenty seven thousand urgent care, seventeen thousand nine hundred and thirteen Bell's palsy, five thousand one hundred and seventy five miscarriages, twenty two thousand two hundred and forty seven heart attacks, twenty eight thousand nine hundred and eight myocarditis, seventy seven thousand three hundred and eleven permanently disabled. And these are people reporting themselves and no one seems to give a damn. And this is why the people do not trust the FDA, along with the myriad of reasons that has been given today. And it's unbelievable. And at the same time, medicines that have been trusted for years, like Ivermectin, one of the safest drugs, was called horse paste and has been one of the best effective treatments against COVID. Now, Mr. Kessler, did you object when Doctor. Marks forced out the two top vaccine scientists at the FDA, Doctor. Gruber and Doctor. Krausz, due to their opposition of mandating booster shots. Did you object to that? Speaker 1: I have enormous respect. Speaker 0: Did you object? Yes or no. Yes or no. I have little time left. Yes or no. Speaker 1: No. But may I may I respond? Speaker 0: May I please respond? Did not object. You did not object. Speaker 1: I had enormous respect for doctor Marks. Speaker 0: I'm glad you do, but you didn't object to him being removed when he said the booster shot should not be mandated, And people that have been vaccinated with COVID nineteen are the people that keep getting COVID nineteen. And the people with the booster shots keep spreading and getting COVID nineteen. No, this is my time. Where people like me with natural immunity don't get it and don't spread it around. Speaker 1: Madam chair, may I please This Speaker 0: is my time, doctor Kessler, and my time has expired.
RepMTG
Posted - April 6, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Saved - April 7, 2025 at 5:30 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

$10 BILLION a year to maintain empty federal buildings… and for what? Most agency HQs are only 25% occupied yet taxpayers are forced to keep footing the bill. This Tuesday at 10 AM, @DOGECommittee will expose this waste and fight to right-size the federal footprint. Tune in!

@DOGECommittee - DOGE Subcommittee

YOU have been paying for EMPTY federal buildings throughout the country. ❌ BILLIONS of dollars have been wasted to upkeep and maintain buildings that serve no purpose. This is a complete WASTE! @DOGECommittee will be investigating the government’s real estate portfolio and identifying the MANY properties that are SQUANDERING taxpayer dollars.💰

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many federal buildings across the United States are sitting empty, costing taxpayers billions of dollars annually for upkeep and repairs. A historically large number of federal office spaces in DC are either empty or underutilized. The government is spending money to keep these unused buildings open, even as many Americans struggle to afford their own homes. The existence of tens of thousands of empty buildings represents waste within the federal system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Knock knock. Nobody's home. Look at this. Got this big beautiful area where employees are supposed to work. Nobody's here. Speaker 1: And now, it's vacant buildings. That's right. Unused federal buildings at your expense. Speaker 2: Repairs are spending billions of dollars a year to keep empty federal government buildings open. Speaker 0: With so many Americans simply trying to hold on to their home, in cities across this country, there's empty buildings, many of them that you're paying for. And the bill is not cheap. Speaker 1: It's not even used. Speaker 0: Organization as large as the United States government, some things are bound to slip through the cracks. But how about an entire building? Actually, how about tens of thousands of buildings all sitting empty at taxpayer expense? Speaker 1: A historically large number of federal office space in DC remains empty or underutilized. Speaker 0: But the the examples of this just go on and on across The United States. It's waste.
RepMTG
Posted - April 1, 2025 at 7:45 PM
Saved - April 2, 2025 at 9:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe Congress was disrupted over Luna's resolution allowing members to vote from home. As a mom, I understand the different seasons of life, but if someone can't fulfill their duties, they should step aside. We have important bills to pass to prevent illegal voting and to support President Trump's agenda. It's disappointing to see politicians prioritizing their own interests over the needs of the American people.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I can’t believe that Congress was hijacked this week over Luna’s resolution to allow members to skip work and vote from home. As a mom, I know all about seasons of life. If you aren’t capable of doing the job your constituents sent you to do, then you should step aside and let someone else do it. We have critical bills to pass to prevent illegals from voting and to stop judges from vetoing President Trump’s agenda. It’s a shame that selfish politicians are putting themselves before the American people.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that being in Congress is a privilege, not a requirement, and that many people could serve if a congressperson chooses to prioritize being home with their family. They are against Luna's bill and the way she is trying to force it to the floor, claiming it will open the door to unconstitutional proxy voting. The speaker suggests members of Congress should leave their egos at the door and recognize the importance of the job, similar to soldiers who deploy overseas and meet their babies months later. They argue that if a member cannot do the job, they should step down, as they are not more important than anyone else. The speaker disapproves of working with Democrats who use a baby to prove a point, and believes the situation is distracting, off-message, and not serving the American people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What we just voted on, this rule, Luna's bill, is extremely unfortunate. You know, being in congress is a privilege. You don't have to be here, and there's plenty of people in her district that could serve in congress if she chose for, you know, the time to be home and be a mother. I'm very much against the bill that she's trying to force to the floor and the way she's going about it. And I think it's wrong. And it's it's really gonna open up the door to proxy voting, which is already unconstitutional, and we shouldn't be doing it. And I think members of congress need to basically leave their egos at the door and realize that this an important job. In the same way that soldiers go off and they're deployed overseas, they come home and actually meet their babies for the first time, and their babies are several months old. Members of congress don't have to be here. They don't have to be here. Being a member of congress congress is a privilege. You're serving your district. There's lots of seasons of life. I'm a mother. I've raised three children. And when my children were babies and were young, I prioritized them in that season of life. Now I serve in congress because I'm not raising children. And I think that's a really important point to make. And if if any member of congress for any reason whatsoever finds them in a situation where they're not able to do the job here, the important job we're elected to do, they should step down because someone else can serve in their place. They're not required to be here. They're not more important than anyone. They're not more important than people in their district. And they shouldn't go across the aisle and work with Democrats while Democrats use a baby propped up around the floor trying to prove their point. But instead, they're holding a baby proving the point you can be a mother and serving So I I think today, I think this is unfortunate and it's distracting and it's off message and it's not the agenda. It's not serving the American people.
RepMTG
Posted - March 28, 2025 at 2:29 AM
Saved - March 28, 2025 at 9:07 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

A must watch!!! @elonmusk and the @DOGE team is saving our country and we owe them a great debt of gratitude!!

@BretBaier - Bret Baier

My interview with the @elonmusk and the @DOGE team tonight on #SpecialReport https://t.co/KKpxEPtu1Z

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doge aims to cut the federal deficit by $1 trillion by reducing waste and fraud, targeting a 15% reduction in federal spending. Astonishingly, billions are wasted routinely, such as a billion-dollar charge for a simple online survey. The goal is to cut waste by $4 billion daily, and Doge publishes findings on doge.gov for transparency. A key focus is modernizing outdated systems, like the paper-based retirement process housed in a mine, aiming to transition it to a digital system. Social Security systems are also being updated to combat fraud, such as fraudulent changes to direct deposit information, where 40% of calls are from fraudsters. Doge aims to ensure legitimate recipients receive more benefits, not less. The team is addressing issues like 15 million "alive" but fraudulent Social Security numbers. At NIH, the goal is to direct more grant money to researchers and consolidate fragmented IT systems. Treasury is working to improve financial controls and prevent improper payments, addressing the fact that the federal government cannot pass an audit. There are 4.6 million government credit cards for 2.3 million employees.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Disparate. Speaker 1: Thanks for having us and doing this. I know there's a lot of interest in this. You know, first, let me start with you, Elon. What are the what are the budgetary savings goals, and and how much do you think you've achieved so far? Speaker 2: Our our goal is to reduce the deficit by a trillion dollars. So, from a nominal deficit of 2,000,000,000,000 to try to cut the deficit in half to 1,000,000,000,000, or looked at it in total federal spending to drop the federal spending from 7,000,000,000,000 to 6,000,000,000,000. We wanna reduce the spending by eliminating waste and fraud, reduce the spending by fifth 15%, which seems really quite achievable. The government is not not efficient, and there's a lot of lot of waste and fraud. So, we feel confident that a 15% reduction can can be done without affecting any of of the critical government services. Speaker 1: I'm gonna talk to all the guys Speaker 2: making it better. Speaker 1: And talk to all the guys here about the specifics. But for you, what's the most astonishing thing you found out in this process? Speaker 2: The sheer amount of waste and fraud in the government. It is astonishing. It's mind blowing. Just we routinely encounter wastes of a billion dollars or more casually. You know, for example, like the simple the simple survey that was literally 10 question survey that you could do with SurveyMonkey cost about $10,000 was the government was being charged almost a billion dollars for that. For just the survey? A billion dollars for for a simple online survey. Do you like the national park? And then there appeared to be no feedback loop for what would be done with that survey. So the survey would just go to nothing. Speaker 1: It was like a time. You technically are a special government employee, and you're supposed to be a hundred and thirty days. Are you going to continue past that, or do you think that's the what you're gonna do? Or Well, I I Speaker 2: think we will have accomplished most of the work required to reduce the deficit by a trillion dollars within that time frame. Speaker 1: So in that time frame, a hundred and days. And and the process is a report at some point, a hundred Speaker 2: days or Not really a report. We we are cutting the waste and fraud in real time. So every day like that passes, our goal is to reduce the the waste and fraud by $4,000,000,000 a day, every day, seven days a week. And so far, we are succeeding. Speaker 1: And we're gonna talk of the specifics, but there there obviously are Doge critics who are reading all kinds of stuff. Obviously, lawmakers on the other side of the aisle are attacking you. And he they characterize the approach as this, fire, ready, and then aim. And how do you approach that? How do you respond to that? Speaker 2: Well, I I do agree that we actually wanna be careful in the cuts. So we want to measure twice, if not thrice, and cut once. And, actually, that is that is our approach. They may characterize it as shooting from the hip, but it is anything but that, which is not to say that we make we don't make mistakes. If we were to approach this with the standard of making no mistakes at all, that would be like saying you someone in baseball's gonna bat a thousand. That's impossible. So when we do make mistakes, we correct them quickly, and we we move on. Speaker 1: Some people say this shouldn't take a rocket scientist. Steve Davis, you are a rocket scientist. Used to be. Yeah. Know. And now, essentially, you're the chief operating officer of Doge, day to day operations. Fair to say? Speaker 3: Yeah. Part part of the Doge team. Speaker 1: What so how did you end up here? What's the biggest challenge you see? Speaker 3: The reason I'm here, which is probably for many, is that I think the goal is incredibly inspiring. I think most of the tax payers in the country would agree that in order to have the the country going bankrupt would be a very bad thing, and therefore, the country going not bankrupt is a good thing, that all of us are willing to kind of put our lives on hold in order to do. I think the thing that's special right now is we actually believe there's a chance to succeed, that there's an administration that's supportive, and a great cabinet and just a great group that will actually make success a possible outcome. And I think that's given the inspiring mission and given the, nonzero chance of success, it it was worth down. Speaker 2: I just just like to sort of re upsize that point. The success of those is only possible with president Trump and with the outstanding cabinet that he selected. It would be impossible without the support of the president and the cabinet. Speaker 1: But you're finding the money. I mean, it's big numbers. Right? Speaker 3: Yeah. Like Elon said, the minimum impulse bid is often a billion dollars. So for example, the $830,000,000, which was the online survey, that's an enormous amount of money. That wouldn't have been found if the Doge team wasn't working with it, in that case, the Department of Interior. But then taking it one step further, Doge then publish publishes these things on our website for maximum transparency. So now the general public it would have been impossible for the general public to have seen that. Now anyone can just log in to doge.gov anytime and see these payments as they're not yet in real time. They're close, but they'll probably be in real time within the next few weeks. Speaker 1: But the process still involves congress. Right? At some level? Speaker 2: We're trying to keep congress as informed as possible, but it it the law does say that money needs to be spent correctly. It should not be spent fraudulently or wastefully. It's not contrary to congress to avoid waste and fraud. It is consistent with the law and consistent with congress, and we've seen actually great support at least from the Republican side of the of the house and occasionally some Democrats too. You know, it's nice to see people cross the aisle once in a while. But usually, when they attack Doge, they never attack any of the specifics. So they'll they'll say what we're doing is somehow unconstitutional or legal or whatever. We're like, well, which line of the cost savings do you disagree with? And they can't point to any. And we list them all on on doge.gov and and the doge handle on x. And you'll see just outrageous things, one outrageous thing after another. Speaker 1: Joe Gabbian, besides Elon, you're one of several billionaires here, cofounder of Airbnb, and you wanted to help out. Speaker 4: I bumped into Anthony Dewan probably back in February, and they told me something about a a mine that was dealt with retirement. And they said that he needs somebody to help out to fix retirement in the government. I I love the challenge, I jumped on board. And it turns out there is actually a mine in Pennsylvania that houses every paper document for the retirement process in the government. Now picture this. This this giant cave has 22,000 filing cabinets stacked 10 high to house 400,000,000 pieces of paper. It's a process that started in the nineteen fifties and largely hasn't changed in the last seventy years. And so as he dug into it, we found retirement cases that had so much paper, they had to fit it on a shipping pallet. So the process takes many months, and we're gonna make it just many days. Speaker 1: Will it be digitized or how Speaker 4: Absolutely. Speaker 5: So this will be an Speaker 4: online digital process that will take just a few days at most. And I really think, you know, it's an injustice to civil servants who are subjected to these processes that are older than the age of half the people watching your show tonight. So we really believe that the government can have an Apple Store like experience, beautifully designed, great, easier experience, modern systems. Speaker 1: Because right now, it's by hand. Speaker 2: Yes. The the the retirement process is all by paper, literally with people carrying paper and manila envelopes in into this gigantic mine. Speaker 1: So they can't retire more than a certain number every month? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 5: About about 8,000 a month. Speaker 2: That that that's how we the reason we discovered it was we were saying like, well, let's encourage voluntary retire retirement. That's the most you could be that could they could do is 8,000 a month. And and even don't know what circumstances it can take six to nine months just to just to have your time and paperwork processed, and they often get the calculations wrong. So like, well, why would it take so long to retire? And they're like, well, because of the mind. You're like, what do mean a mind? What's a mind got to do with retiring? And that's where we discovered that all the retirement stuff is done by still done by paper in a process that looks identical to what occurred in the nineteen fifties. Like, we took a snapshot of the mind when it first started in the fifties to today. It looks the same. Speaker 1: It's amazing. So how long do you think it'll take take to turn over? Speaker 4: We're working as fast as we can. Probably next couple of months, we'll have this this overhauled. And, you know, I really think, again, like, why are we subjecting our federal workers to processes that they actually have to go through a training just to retire from the government. There's a whole training program that people have to go through in order to retire. I I think we can do better for them. Speaker 1: Aram Mogadasi, a Doge engineer. Yeah. You go into these places, one of the more than a dozen engineers, first people to go into the agencies and view the computer datasets. Tell me what you're finding. And for people who don't understand how that process works, explain it for them. Speaker 0: Yeah. I'll say the first thing that got me really excited about Doge was learning basically, the state of government computers. By some estimates, government IT costs about a hundred billion dollars, and it's funding systems that are over 50 years old in the case of something like Social Security or the IRS. So really critical systems are are old. They cost a lot of money to maintain, and, they could be the the efforts to improve them are often very delayed. So I I thought I'm a software engineer, that that maybe could make a difference here, and, that's that's really what inspired me at a high level. Speaker 1: There's lot of history about Social Security and a lot of words about it from here's what Democrats have been saying about Speaker 3: It's absurd that Elon Musk is trying to eliminate billions of dollars from Social Security. Speaker 0: Elon Musk and president Trump have set their sights on cutting Social Security. Speaker 1: Their goal is clear, destroy Social Security from within. You're in the building. I mean, you're in the computers. What's happening there? What are you doing? Speaker 5: Yeah. Speaker 0: It doesn't line up with my experience on the ground. And I'll say the two improvements that we're trying to make to Social Security are helping people that legitimately get benefits, protect them from fraud that they experience every day on a routine basis, and also make the experience better. And I'll give you one one example is at Social Security, one of the first things we learned is that they get phone calls every day of people trying to change direct deposit information. So when you want to change your bank account, you can call Social Security. We learned 40% of the phone calls that they get are from fraudsters. Speaker 1: Forty percent? Speaker 0: That's right. Almost half. Speaker 2: Yes. And and they they steal people's social security is what happens. Is they they call in, they say, they claim to be a retiree, then they they and they convince the post the Social Security person on the phone to change the where the where the money is flowing. It it actually goes to some fraudster. This is happening all day every day. And and then and then somebody doesn't receive their Social Security is because of of all the the forward loopholes in the Social Security system. Speaker 1: How do you reassure people that what you all are doing is not gonna affect their benefits? Speaker 2: No. In fact, what what we're doing will help their benefits. Legitimate people, as a result of the work of Doge, will receive more social security, not less. Wanna emphasize that. As a result of the work of Doge, legitimate recipients of social security will receive more money, not less money. Speaker 1: Alright. Speaker 2: And and and and let the record show that I said this and the it will be proven out to be true. Let's let's check back on this in the future. Speaker 1: So it's Washington Post. The Social Security Administration website crashed four times in ten days this month because the servers were overloaded, blocking millions of retirees and disabled veterans from logging into their online accounts. Freaked people out. Is it is that gonna change? Speaker 2: Yes. We're gonna make sure that the website stays online. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, but is it a result of going in there No. Or something you're doing? Speaker 3: It's No. No. The the amount of issues that were the social security system are are enormous. As an example, there are over 15,000,000 people that are 20 that are marked as alive in the social security system. Speaker 1: And that's an accurate figure. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: Correct. 15,000,000. Speaker 3: Correct. This has been something that's been identified as a problem. Again, preexisting problems since February at least from an IG report. So there are some great people working at the social security administration Social Security Administration that found this 02/2008 and nothing was done. And so 15 to 20,000,000 social security numbers that were clearly fraudulent were floating around that can be used only for bad intentions. There'd be no way to use those for good intentions. And so what one of the things the Doge team is doing is carefully and very methodically looking at those and making sure that any fraudulent ones are eliminated. Speaker 1: Brett Smith, working at HHS, and obviously another element is Medicare and Medicaid, NIH. What are you finding? Speaker 6: Yeah. Well, I'd say there's a couple of things we're really committed to in our work at HHS. Number one, making sure we continue to have the best biomedical research in the world. And number two, making sure which president Trump has said over and over again that we 100% protect Medicare and Medicaid, but there's a lot of opportunity. So if I take NIH as an example, today, if you're an NIH researcher and you get a hundred dollar grant at your university, today, you get to spend 60 of that and your university spends 40 of that. The policy that we're proposing to make is that you get to spend 85 of that and your university spends 15. So that's more money going directly to the scientists who are discovering new cures. Another example at NIH is today they have 27 different centers. They got created over time by congress and they're typically by disease state or body system. There's 700 different IT systems today at NIH. Speaker 1: Seven hundred different IT systems. Speaker 2: IT software systems. They don't connect. Speaker 6: They can't speak to each other. Speaker 1: So they don't talk to one. Speaker 6: They have 27 different CIOs. And so when you think about making great medical discoveries, you have to connect the data. Speaker 1: Time out. Time out. You said 27 different chief information officers? Speaker 6: Correct. Correct. Speaker 2: And most of them are nontechnical. Speaker 1: So there's a lot there. Speaker 6: There's a there's a lot of opportunity. It will make science better, not worse. Speaker 2: And when I say that our job is tech support, I really mean it. Yeah. We have to fix the computers. If the computers can't talk to each other, you can't get research done. If the computers can't go stay online, people won't receive their social security. So what we have here are a bunch of failing computer systems that are preventing people from receiving their their benefits, that are preventing people from preventing research from happening, that are, extremely vulnerable to fraud, and we're fixing it. Speaker 1: And does that include AI? Does that include kind of changing the system overall? That's, I guess, what people are afraid of is they don't know Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 1: What this is all looking like, and is it gonna affect me in the long term? Speaker 2: It's gonna affect them. It's gonna affect people very positively. So the the changes that we're doing here will ensure the solvency of the American government, of the American of of The United States Of America. This is what this is what we're trying to do is ensure that people do receive their benefits in the future. And you can only receive your benefits if the if the if the country is operating in a in a healthy and competent way. Speaker 1: Anthony Armstrong, Doge, office of personnel management, Morgan Stanley banker, m and a guy. Yeah. You know money, and this is a lot of money sloshing around. Speaker 5: There's a lot of money sloshing around. It's a lot of money sloshing out the door. And if you look at the federal government and the way the workforce works, it's really a one way ratchet over decades. Speaker 1: You It's only going up. Speaker 5: It's only going up. You never you never take it away. So that leaves you with duplicative functions. It leaves you with overstaffing, and it leaves you with functions in the wrong places. So a couple of examples, duplicative functions. Brad mentioned 27 CIOs. If you had kept going with Brad, he probably he would talk about the communications office. I think you've got forty forty distinct communications offices in HHS. Yeah. 40? Yeah. Yeah. And that's not unusual by by the way. Multiple offices like It's like anyone healthy. This is not about the employees there. There's many many hardworking, well meaning people who who took jobs. These jobs were out there. They applied for them. They took them. They're doing what's there. It's just that they're duplicating the effort of 40 offices. So you've got that. You've got over staffing. A good example of over staffing would be the IRS has got 1,400 people who are dedicated to provisioning laptops and and cell phones. So if you join the IRS, you get a laptop and a cell phone, you're provisioned. So if each of those IRS officers or employees provisioned two employees per day, you could provision the entire IRS in a little more than a month. So 12 times a year Speaker 2: 1,400 people whose only job it is to give out a laptop and a phone. Speaker 5: Right. The the whole IRS could be handled once a month. So that doesn't that doesn't make any sense. And president Trump's been very clear. It's scalpel, not hatchet, and that's the way it's it's getting done. And then once those decisions are made, there's a very heavy focus on being generous, being caring, being compassionate, and treating everyone with dignity and respect. And and if you look at how people have started to leave the government, it is largely through voluntary means. There's voluntary early retirement. There's voluntary separation payments. We put in place deferred resignation, the eight month severance program. So there's a very heavy bias towards programs that are long dated, that are generous, that allow people to exit and go and get a new job in the private sector. And you've you've heard a lot of a lot of news about rifts about people getting fired. At at this moment in time, less than point one five not 1.5, less than point one five of the federal workforce has actually been given a riff notice. Speaker 1: So So they've selected if they're a leader. Speaker 2: It it is Basically, almost no one's gotten fired That's what we're saying. Speaker 1: Tom Krausz, working at treasury, you are having access to the payment system, oversees all the outgoing payments. Essentially, payments were going places we didn't know where they were going. Right? Speaker 7: Yeah. Unfortunately, that's the case, Brett. You know, as an ex CFO of a big public tech company, really what we're doing is we're applying public company standards to the federal government. And it is alarming how the financial operations and financial management is set up today. There is actually really only one bank account that's used to disperse all monies that go out of the federal government. Speaker 1: Time out. One bank account. Speaker 2: It's a big one. Speaker 1: It's a Speaker 3: big one. It's a Speaker 7: big one. One. A couple weeks ago, had $800,000,000,000 in it, but it's the the treasury general account. So when you hear, you know, some of my colleagues here, what they're talking about in terms of the fraud, you have to ask, well, why is this allowed to happen at a financial level? Well, it's actually quite simple but alarming. The treasury up until now, and thanks to president Trump, we're fixing this. In fact, there's an executive order that he just signed, the other day, which is protecting America's bank account because it really is the taxpayers' money. One, we're changing the culture. The culture has been not a lot of caring and not a lot of commitment to doing what's right relative to financial operations. There's a $500,000,000,000 of fraud every year. There's hundreds of billion dollars of improper payments, and we can't pass an audit. The the consolidated financial report is produced by treasury, and we cannot pass it on. We have material weaknesses. What that means is that if I was a public company CFO, I would effectively be removed. I couldn't file financial statements. I couldn't issue securities. Can't on. Can't it on. Speaker 2: Right. The the federal government cannot pass an order. It's impossible. In fact, the the in order to pass an order, you need the information necessary to pass an order. You need to have the payment codes. You need to have the payment explanation, and you need to have a person you can contact to understand why that payment was made. None of those things were mandatory Yeah. Until until just recently, just a few weeks ago. In fact, maybe last week? Speaker 7: Yeah. We're serving 580 plus agencies. And up until very recently, effectively, they could say make the payment and treasury just sent it out as fast as possible. No verification. And so what we're doing is what any household would do. But imagine you're a household, you have a bank account, everyone has an ATM card connected to that account, everyone has a checkbook connected to that account. It's not just your children. It's not just your parents. It's your in laws. It's your extended family. And they all can go to the account and disperse funds. No questions asked. No justification. No verification. Speaker 1: Tyler, Hasson, interior department, you're a form former oil company CEO. You're reviewing contracts before they're approved for funding. What what are you finding? Speaker 8: Well, Elon and Steve kinda stole my thunder a little bit, but I actually found that customer service survey contract. I actually have an example of one right here. I could have done this in high school. And I I found it Speaker 2: It's that bad. Speaker 8: I found it on the weekends because under the Biden administration, there was no departmental oversight within the Department of Interior whatsoever. None. We are now reviewing every single contract, every single grant. And when things come to my attention that don't make sense, I'm bringing him to secretary Bergam, and he has been fantastic. He's he's a businessman. He's very supportive of Doge. It's been wonderful Speaker 2: to work with Is Speaker 1: the battle between government of decades and decades of buildup and business, which you guys are, is that like a train hitting each other? I mean, it it seems like it's pretty disruptive. Well, this is a revolution. Speaker 2: And I think it it might be the might be the biggest revolution in government since the original revolution. But at the end of the day, America is gonna be in much better shape. America will be solvent. The critical programs that people depend upon will work, and it's gonna be a fantastic future. And but are we gonna get a lot of complaints along the way? Absolutely. You know, one the things I learned at PayPal was the you know, who complains the loudest and the with the the most amount of fake righteous indignation? The fraudsters. That's it's a tell. You know these NGOs that are crazy? Like the the $2,000,000,000 to Stacey Abrams NGO that basically didn't exist and suddenly gets $2,000,000,000 awarded from the federal government. She has why. And there are many such cases like that. Speaker 1: I think that most people, common sense wise, would say the fraud's gotta end. Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 1: They're concerned about the 94 year old mother who skips a check or somehow doesn't get what she's supposed to get. Speaker 2: Right. And what we're trying to say is actually the that that the 94 year old grandmother is is actually, as a result of Joe Doge's work, going to get her check. She's not going to be robbed by fraudsters like she's getting robbed today. And the solvency of the of the federal government will ensure that she continues to receive those social security checks that Medicare continues to work without which we're all doomed. And the reason we're doing this is because if if we don't do it, America's gonna go insolvent. We're gonna go bankrupt, and nobody's gonna get anything. Speaker 1: Why are you guys all doing it? I mean, you can pipe up, but it you don't have to be here. Right? I mean, you don't you don't have to be doing this. Speaker 7: I have four blessed with four beautiful children, my wife and I, But we have a real fiscal crisis, and and this is not sustainable. And what's worse, back to my children and everyone else's children, is we are burdening them with that debt, and it's only gonna grow. Speaker 1: Steve, there's not a lot of hierarchy here. You guys are kind of all approaching it in different, you know, silos, but with the same kind of goal. Right? I mean, Speaker 3: this is really Silicon Valley private sector colliding with government. Yeah. Exactly. And we're headed in a bad path, but then the chance of success exists. And just the one that just is in my head right now, which is a fairly mundane one, but I think is very illustrative is credit cards. Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. Speaker 3: There are in the in the federal government around 4,600,000 credit cards for around 2.3 to 2,400,000 employees. This doesn't make sense. Right. And so one of the things all of the teams have have worked on is we've worked with the agencies and said, do you need all of these credit cards? Are they being used? Can you tell us physically where they are? I hope they're getting frequent flyers. Actually, on a different note, the rewards program the federal government has is actually not very good. It costs. That's a whole other It's a negotiation. Right. Yeah. Exactly. But so far, the teams have worked together, and they've reduced it from 4,600,000.0 to to 4,300,000.0. So So we're taking we're taking it easy. Speaker 7: Yeah. But but Speaker 2: clearly, there should not be, you know, more there should be more credit cards than there are people. Speaker 1: Yeah. Joe, middle level employees, are they seeing a benefit to being empowered by taking out bureaucracy? I mean Speaker 4: Absolutely. I mean, I think what you're seeing is taking the best Silicon Valley in the business world and bringing it into the government. We're bringing the best practices and the best methodologies. And people are inspired, right, especially on the retirement process, which I can speak to. They've been trying to modernize and get off of paper since early two thousands, very unsuccessfully. Every attempt has gone over budget, and been canceled, because it hasn't been successful. And so, you know, I showed up and I feel like I'm here because it's an interesting problem. We can use design to solve it and good engineering and really create a better experience for everybody. Speaker 2: They were we're talking about elementary financial controls that are necessary for any company to function. So, like, if if these can if if if the federal government if if if a commercial company operated the way the federal government does, then it would be go immediately go bankrupt. It would be delisted. The officers would be arrested. And the changes we're putting in place will enable the federal government to pass an audit. It will enable enable taxpayers to know where the money is going and know that their hard earned tax tax dollars are being spent well. But the ways that the government is defrauded is that the computer systems don't talk to each other. So if the computer systems systems don't talk to each other, then it you you can you can exploit that gap and and forces exploit that exploit that gap, take advantage. If, for example, there were over $300,000,000 of small business administration loans that has been given out to people under the age of 11. Speaker 3: Well, actually, to add to this, 300,000,000 under the age of 11 and over three hundred million to over the age of 120. Speaker 1: Definitely Small business loans. Speaker 2: Correct. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 2: The the oldest American is a hundred and 14. So it's safe to say if their age is 15 or above, they're they're fake, or they should be in the Guinness Guinness Book of World Records. And we we should not be giving out loans to babies. So the youngest recipient of a small business administration loan is a nine month year old, which is a very very cautious baby we're talking about here. So obviously, it was just fraudulent. And what they and and they do terrible things. They actually will see that a a kid's been born. They will steal that kid's social security number and then take out a loan, and and leave that kid with a with a bad credit rating. There was literally a baby. The terrible things are being done is what we're saying. And how? We're stopping these terrible things. Speaker 1: And you can stop it? Speaker 4: I mean Well, we are stopping Speaker 2: The reason this is happening Speaker 5: is because the the two systems are not talking to each other. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 5: Right? And so you don't know at the small business administration that you're giving a loan to a nine month old, which happened in one case, because you're not cross referencing that with the social security administration data that has birth dates. So that very, very simple fix Yes. Eliminates tremendous fraud. And and that there are multiple systems across the government where the systems are not speaking with one another. And if you just solve that simple problem, you would solve a huge amount of fraud. Speaker 1: Are you surprised? One of ways Speaker 2: that like, one one of the the key tricks that the fraudsters pull is that they will use the fact that someone is mocked as live and as as sort of just that that Social Security number is mocked as live in Social Security, and then then get disability and unemployment insurance for a dead person. Because the databases don't talk to each other, all they got was from Social Security is like, is this person alive? Yes. They're not they're not alive. It's falsely marked person is falsely marked as alive in social security, but they didn't but but that first a fraudster can now get unemployment and disability for from a dead person. This is happening all the time at scale. Speaker 1: Are you surprised at some of the legal efforts and some of the judges that have weighed in? There's about eight or 10 now of these cases that are at least temporary holds. They're being challenged by the DOJ. Right. Are you surprised by that pushback? Speaker 2: Well, it's the the DC circuit is notorious for having a very far left bias. And when you look at the people close to some of these judges, who who who are where are they working? Are they working at these NGOs? Are they getting the the other ones getting this money? Does that seem like system that lacks corruption? It sounds like corruption to me. Speaker 1: Last thing. Do you guys all see this as a patriotic duty? I mean, is that really what this is about? It's essential. Very Speaker 8: much. I do. A %. I I was running five businesses in Houston, and and I left that. I left great people to do this. And my wonderful wife said, go for it. And here I am. But I I feel like this is me giving back to the country. Speaker 2: If if we don't do this, we're sunk. The ship unless unless this exercise is successful, the ship of America will sink. That's why we're doing it. Speaker 1: Well, gentlemen, I really appreciate the time today. And hopefully, it took some of the myth and mystery out of Doge and what's happening behind the scenes. Speaker 2: Thank you.
RepMTG
Posted - March 27, 2025 at 11:35 AM
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 9:55 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Yes sir, Mr. President! We will defund NPR and PBS!! The American people will NOT pay for disgusting Democrat propaganda anymore!! https://t.co/vD776ZEUl3

RepMTG
Posted - March 26, 2025 at 12:06 AM
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 11:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I witnessed Jasmine Crockett, accompanied by a Capitol Police escort, navigating the halls of Congress. This follows her recent altercation with an independent journalist regarding her stance on violence against Tesla. Crockett has expressed a desire to take down Elon Musk and has been accused of inciting domestic terrorism against Tesla and its affiliates. Additionally, she has threatened Senator Ted Cruz and mocked Governor Abbott's wheelchair use. Despite her actions, she seems to require protection while her male staffer carries her designer handbag.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Tonight, I saw an entitled Jasmine Crockett with a new Capitol Police escort walking through the already protected halls of Congress. This comes, after today, she assaulted an independent journalist who was asking if she condones violence against Tesla. Crockett recently said her birthday wish was to take down Elon Musk and has fueled domestic terrorism against Tesla, Tesla owners, and Tesla employees. She physically threatened Senator Ted Cruz and shamefully made fun of Gov Abbot being in a wheelchair. But SHE apparently needs a Capitol police escort to protect her while she made her male staffer carry her designer handbag. Jasmine Crockett is the face of the Democrat party. And rightfully so.

RepMTG
Posted - March 26, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 10:48 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

🚨WATCH: Opening Statement🚨 NPR & PBS have taken advantage of millions of the American people’s hard-earned tax dollars to push Democrat propaganda and alienate more than half of the country. Today, @DOGECommittee is asking why they think they deserve YOUR money. Here is my opening statement:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The DOGE Subcommittee is examining federal funding for public radio and television, asserting that over half a billion dollars are spent annually on NPR and PBS. These entities allegedly create content for public radio and TV stations nationwide. The speaker claims that NPR and PBS have become "radical left wing echo chambers" for wealthy, urban liberals, citing examples such as featuring a drag queen on a children's show and producing a documentary called Growing Up Trans. They claim that PBS is one of the founders of the "trans child abuse industry." The speaker references an essay by Yuri Berliner, a veteran NPR editor, who described NPR's leftward shift during the Trump administration, including its focus on Russiagate and embrace of DEI ideology. Berliner was allegedly forced to resign after raising concerns. The speaker criticizes NPR's CEO, Katherine Marr, for dismissing Berliner's concerns and for her own progressive views. The speaker questions whether taxpayers should continue funding NPR and PBS.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning. At the DOGE Subcommittee, we are continuing our war on waste. That means rooting out spending that is unnecessary, wasteful, and frankly un American. Today we are looking at the more than half a billion dollars federal tax payers spend annually to fund public radio and television. A big chunk of this subsidy flows to national public radio and public broadcasting service. NPR and PBS are the big DC based entities that create and distribute much of the news and educational content heard and seen on public radio and TV stations across the country. When Congress adopted the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, it did so because it thought at the time that federal dollars were needed to provide objective news and education content to the entire nation, including rural residents who lived off the grid. Fast forward a few decades and a lot has changed. The invention of the internet, for instance, and social media. It's made news and information widely available to those living in remote areas. Americans are increasingly consuming digital media and podcast. The audience of public radio and television is declining. And I know this because I represent a rural district where farmers listen to podcasts and internet based news while they drive their tractors. At the same time, NPR and PBS have increasingly become radical left wing echo chambers for a narrow audience of mostly wealthy, white, urban liberals, and progressives who generally look down on and judge rural America. PBS News is not just left leaning, but it is actively uses taxpayer funds to push some of the most radical left positions, like featuring a drag queen on the show Let's Learn, a show targeted toward young children ages three to eight years old. I want you to know, I grew up watching children's programming on PBS. And as a mother who raised three children, I felt confident that I could leave the room while my own children were watching children's programming on PBS. But I can tell you right now, Ms. Kerger, specifically, as a mother, if I had walked in my living room or one of my children's bedrooms and seen this child predator and this monster targeting my children, I would become unglued. And that is how most parents feel all over this country. This is not the only example of them sexualizing and grooming children. They've been doing it for over the last decade. In 2015, PBS produced Frontline put out a documentary Growing Up Trans that takes viewers on an intimate and eye opening journey inside the struggles and choices facing transgender kids and their families. This means that PBS is one of the founders of the trans child abuse industry, all while taking taxpayer money. Brainwashing and transing children is an issue so hated by parents across the country that it was a driving force in the landslide Republican and Trump victory in the twenty twenty four election cycle and presidential race. The news that these entities produced is either resented or increasingly tuned out and turned off by most of the hardworking Americans who are forced to pay for it. They no longer view NPR and PBS as trusted news sources. As a matter of fact, with these people, they're a threat. In fact, when Elon Musk put his hand over his heart and extended it and told the American people, his heart goes out to them. PBS News posted the clip, called it a fascist Nazi salute, and described how it was similar to the same hyal used by Nazis at their victory rallies. Not once did PBS or NPR report on the numerous accounts of Democrats making the same gesture. AOC, Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, Elizabeth Warren, somebody that lost a presidential race, Hillary Clinton, governor Tim Walz. Why wasn't this treated exactly the same way? Is there not a standard in journalism today? Apparently not. Here's How We Lost America's Trust was in fact the title of a powerful essay written last year by Yuri Berliner, a veteran NPR editor. In his essay, Berliner described how NPR's downward spiral accelerated greatly during the first Trump administration. He said NPR dedicated efforts to damage the Trump presidency via relentless pursuit of Russiagate rumors that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia over the election. NPR hosts interviewed Adam Schiff, then the top Democrat of the House Intelligence Committee, twenty five times about Trump and Russia. But they made no apologies when the Mueller report found no evidence that the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia because they did not. Berliner also described NPR's passionate embrace of the left wing DEI ideology that Americans clearly reject as evidenced by the November elections. NPR's language and style guides were shaped by race and gender based affinity groups that dominated the internal culture of the organization. And NPR journalists were to ask everyone they interviewed their race, gender, and ethnicity, and enter it into a centralized tracking system. This tracking system embeds DEI into the fibers of its content. Sounds like racism to me. It's a software attached to NPR's content management system where these reporters and producers submit information about their sources' race and ethnicity, gender identity, geographic location that's kinda scary and age range. The tool allows NPR to track the demographics of their sources in real time to allow for source diversity. The irony of these supposed diverse sources is that NPR has no interest, real interest in diversity, like having diverse viewpoints. Berliner tried to sound the alarm on this when he checked voter registration records on of the editors at DC's NPR headquarters and found 87 registered Democrats and zero registered Republicans. But NPR treated Berliner like a political dissident in the old Soviet Union. He was driven out of the organization and forced to resign. Sounds like communism. And the ringleader of that effort was NPR's then newly appointed CEO, Katherine Marr, who is before us today. She dismissed Mr. Berliner's wake up call as profoundly disrespectful, hurtful, and demeaning. In other words, instead of viewing it as a chance to finally right the ship at NPR, she doubled down. In doing so, she made it clear how any further internal dissent would be dealt with on her watch. That does sound like communist China at the taxpayer's expense. And no one should be surprised, NPR installed her in the top job after Ms. Marr was firmly on record with a litany of public comments and social media posts displaying her ultra progressive views, her scorn for free speech, and her fondness for censorship. So now it's up to Congress to determine if Americans are going to continue to provide her and the organization that put her in charge, willingly, after they knew these things, with taxpayer funds to continue to pursue their progressive, or rather communist agenda. For far too long, federal taxpayers have been forced to fund biased news. This needs to come to an end and it needs to come to an end now. So I am glad Ms. Marr and Ms. Kerger accepted our invitation to show up today and be held accountable to the tax payers. I look forward to them answering our questions in full public view and explaining to the American people why they think they deserve Americans' hard earned taxpayer money.
RepMTG
Posted - March 26, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it concerning that the CEO of NPR called President Trump a “deranged racist sociopath,” which alienates his 77 million voters. Additionally, Ms. Maher appears more focused on deplatforming those she sees as fascist rather than protecting the First Amendment, especially given NPR's taxpayer funding.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

The CEO of NPR labeled President Trump a “deranged racist sociopath,” alienating the 77 MILLION people who voted for him. Ms. Maher seems more concerned with deplatforming individuals she views as fascist than she does with upholding the First Amendment. That’s a problem when NPR is receiving millions in taxpayer funds.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A congresswoman questioned Miss Mar about her public statements and social media posts, which the congresswoman characterized as left-wing ideology and opposition to free speech. The congresswoman cited Mar's past role as head of Wikipedia, which she claimed doesn't tell the truth, and statements calling Donald Trump a "deranged racist and sociopath" and America "addicted to white supremacy." The congresswoman also criticized Mar for chastising the use of "boy and girl" and for calling the First Amendment the "number one challenge in American journalism." The congresswoman asked Mar if it was up to her or NPR to crack down on bad information and decide the truth. Mar stated she is a strong believer in free speech. The congresswoman then referenced a 2021 Atlantic Council event where Mar said she took a very active approach to disinformation and misinformation as CEO of Wikipedia, censoring information through conversations with government during the COVID pandemic and the 2020 election. The congresswoman asked if those governments included the Biden administration. Mar stated that Wikipedia never censored any information.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Miss Mar, your public statements and social media posts reflect left wing ideology and blatant opposition to free speech. After all, you were the head of Wikipedia for many years, which is a platform that doesn't tell the truth. Let's walk through some of the public, some of your statements, so the public can understand your personal views. Your fellow Ameri you said, your fellow Americans, your fellow Americans just selected Donald Trump as president again this past November. You called him a deranged racist and sociopath. You posted on X that America is addicted to white supremacy. It's appalling. You've publicly chastised using the phrase boy and girl, which you said erases the language for non binary people. There's only two genders by the way. Miss Marr, the federal funding that your outlet receives comes from all American taxpayer dollars, not just from your viewers who support such statements as these. Let me inform you and that so that your that your federal funding is also paid for by the other half of the country. The 77,000,000 Americans who voted for President Trump, Someone you called a deranged racist sociopath. Miss Marr, many find your pro censorship and anti free speech views more concerning than your politics. The only speech you like seems to be speech that you agree with. In 2021, you called the First Amendment the number one challenge in American journalism because it makes it hard to crack down on bad information. You said in a TED Talk that our reverence for the truth might be a distraction. You've also expressed support for de platforming individuals you view as fascist. Who do you think should be charged with cracking down on so called bad information? Is it NPR? Is it the government? Is it you, Ms. Marr? Speaker 1: Congresswoman, Madam Chair, thank you so much for the opportunity to address this. I know Speaker 0: Do you is it up to you and NPR to crack down on bad information or decide the truth? Answer the question. Yes or no, Ms. Marr. Speaker 1: Absolutely not. I'm a very strong believer in free speech and I believe that more speech Speaker 0: Your public statements say otherwise. Ms. Maurer, in 2021, when speaking at an Atlantic Council event, you said that when you were CEO of Wikipedia, you took a very active approach to disinformation and misinformation. During the COVID pandemic and the twenty twenty election, you said you censored information through conversations with government. Which governments were those, Ms. Marr? The Biden administration? Yes or no? Speaker 1: Madam chair, Wikipedia never censored any information. Speaker 0: These are your public statements, miss Marr.
RepMTG
Posted - March 26, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Saved - March 26, 2025 at 9:19 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

⚠️CLOSING STATEMENT⚠️ After listening to what we've heard today, we will be calling for the complete and total defund and dismantling of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. NPR & PBS can hate us on their own dime. It’s time American taxpayers stop footing the bill. https://t.co/2OfjGzmNlF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) uses taxpayer money to suppress truth and diverse viewpoints, and to produce outlandish content. They state that private businesses operate without government funding. As a result of these claims, they will call for the complete defunding and dismantling of the CPB. They believe people should be able to disagree with them without taxpayer funding of CPB.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is using taxpayer dollars to actively suppress the truth, suppress diverse viewpoints, and produce some of the most outlandish, ludicrous content. After listening to what we've heard today, we will be calling for the complete and total defund and dismantling of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Here's how it works in America every single day. Every single day, private businesses operate on their own without government funding. We believe that you all can hate us on your own dime.
RepMTG
Posted - March 26, 2025 at 2:15 PM
Saved - March 26, 2025 at 7:36 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

This is the type of programming your tax dollars are funding on PBS. They are targeting children ages 3-8 with this propaganda. IT'S HORRIFYING!! https://t.co/QBPIo4zqk8

Video Transcript AI Summary
The hips on the drag queen go swish, swish, swish. The shoulders on the drag queen go shimmy, shammy, shammy, shammy, shammy, shammy, shammy, shammy. The mouth of the dragon goes blah blah blah all through the town.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So get your singing voices ready. And we're gonna start with our hips. The hips on the drag queen go swish, swish, swish. Swish, swish, swish. The shoulders on the drag queen go shimmy, shammy, shammy, shammy, shammy, shammy, shammy, shammy. Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah blah The mouth of the dragon goes blah blah blah all through the town.
RepMTG
Posted - March 22, 2025 at 12:44 PM
Saved - March 23, 2025 at 3:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm heartbroken over the tragic murder of Camillia Williams, a mother and grandmother, in Georgia. This senseless act, linked to open border policies, has left us mourning. I believe that deportation isn't sufficient; the perpetrator deserves the death penalty.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

In Georgia, we are mourning the tragic and completely avoidable murder of another Georgia woman because of Democrat’s open border and cartel first policies!!!😡 Camillia Williams, a mother of five and grandmother, was brutally murdered by an illegal monster!! Deportation is not enough, GIVE HIM THE DEATH PENALTY!!!!!

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/cobb-county/man-accused-killing-cobb-mother-dumping-her-woods-was-us-illegally-ice-says/3QSYBBXGAJCGPLRMO2XHDVXL7Y/

404 Error – WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta wsbtv.com
RepMTG
Posted - March 20, 2025 at 2:33 AM
Saved - March 20, 2025 at 4:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by the calls for violence against Tesla and Elon Musk. A Member of Congress seems to be inciting political violence, and there are discussions about planning numerous attacks on Tesla. Some individuals openly express their desire to see Musk harmed, framing their intentions as protests. It's concerning how these sentiments are masked as non-violent actions while clearly advocating for harm.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

A Member of Congress is organizing political violence and terrorism. @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash

@amuse - @amuse

TERROR: Group planning 500 attacks on Tesla on March 29th. https://t.co/d29mRTXJx4

@sierracatalina1 - sierra catalina

this group is VERY organized.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

https://t.co/aByYkvuPsX

@TheGasStovee - The Gas Stove 🔥

🚨Crockett: “All I want to see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be taken down. Yes!!!” Cusack: “Everybody should really enjoy taking this guy down and the stock down.” Winter: “Tesla is permanently tarnished the moment Musk gave that Nazi salute” These people are calling for violence under the disguise of “non-violent protests”.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers advocate for actions to diminish Elon Musk's influence, asserting that the country is becoming increasingly fascist and that wealthy individuals must be held accountable. One strategy involves targeting Tesla's stock price to force Musk to sell shares to cover his Twitter debt, potentially triggering a "death spiral" for Tesla and diminishing Musk's wealth and power. Speakers emphasize the need for clear demands and a commitment to persist until Tesla is separated from Musk. They claim Musk has harmed democracy and that protests will continue to grow until he is stopped. The goal is to take down a man who has allegedly done, and will continue to do, colossal harm.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll make sure that I keep it short, but I am truly here for very selfish reasons. Starting with on March 29, it's my birthday. And all I want to see happen on my birthday is for Eli to be taken down. Yes. Speaker 1: So I think everybody should really enjoy taking this guy down and the stock down. And because of the example that we'll set, you know, nothing's gonna we are in a a oligarchic country that's that's that's fascist and becoming more fascist every day. And that means people are gonna die, and it's gonna get as ugly as we can think. And the only way to stop that is if the people who have the money are afraid of us, the 99%. And, you know, it's the people who own the society, the owners, Those people, we have to make them really afraid. And what's happening now with Musk is making them very afraid, and that's a good thing. Speaker 2: If we kill the Tesla brand, if we drive down the stock price loan off, we can force him to sell his stock to pay back the billions of dollars of debt that he took on to buy Twitter. This will drive Tesla stock into a death spiral. Tanking Tesla stock is a very solid strategy, and it's one of the only solid strategies that's really been articulated to deal with this moment. And if we're successful, we will collapse Elon Musk's wealth and with it, his power. Speaker 3: So we need to be very clear about what our demands are, about what our bright lines are, and that we're not gonna stop until Tesla is done with Musk. Thank you. Speaker 4: Tesla was permanently tarnished the moment Musk gave that Nazi salute and followed it with his brutal attack on the lives of ordinary citizens. And meanwhile, the protests will continue to grow. They won't stop until Musk is stopped. That means more people in the streets, more people learning the facts about his attack on our democracy, more people who aren't afraid of standing up to corruption and bullies. Speaker 5: This is something that hasn't happened very much in our country, and it's time to take down a man who's done colossal harm and will do more harm if we don't stop him.
View Full Interactive Feed