reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @_APWK_
reSee.it AI Summary
I injected myself with HIV positive blood to expose what I believe is a massive fraud in medical history. My aim is to reveal the truth about HIV, similar to how Dr. Walter Reed demonstrated the truth about yellow fever. Despite the risks, I tested negative multiple times.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Dr. Robert Willner injects himself with HIV. When asked why he would put his life on the line to make a point, Dr. Willner replied: "I do this to put a stop to the greatest murderous fraud in medical history. By injecting myself with HIV positive blood, I am proving the point as Dr. Walter Reed did to prove the truth about yellow fever. In this way it is my hope to expose the truth about HIV in the interest of all mankind." He tested negative multiple times.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker introduces a butterfly needle set, typically used for blood draws and injections. He recounts a story about accidentally injecting himself with penicillin while trying to give his infant son a shot.
He then proceeds to wipe the needle thoroughly in blood. The speaker states that he is doing this for the sake of humanity, addressing Fauci, Gottlieb, Galpin, Gallo, and other unnamed individuals. He claims this action is in the hope that it will save millions of lives from what he calls the greatest lie ever told. He states that the process hurts him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a heck of a time to lose my needle. There we go. Okay. Ladies and gentlemen this is a typical butterfly needle set. If somebody has a scissor it'll pop there I got it.
Okay. It's sterile And usually we use it to take blood by sticking this in and then we can inject things also. So let's do that. We got this. Yeah.
Yeah. Let me put my glasses on. Good. I think you'd rather I do that. I got to tell you a cute little story.
Shortly after my son was born many years ago, he's now 40, he got some kind of an infection or whatnot and I spoke to a pediatrician at the hospital, I was an intern at the time, and he said go home and give him a shot of penicillin. So I took the syringe and everything home and my wife held Bruce over her shoulder and I grabbed his little bottom cheek and I go like this and I stuck it right into my thumb so Careful! You can tell I don't like doing this, never have. Okay. Now we want to get a lot of blood.
There we go. Okay. There we go. I'm wiping this needle thoroughly in this blood and I say to my friends Fauci and Gottlieb and Galpin and Gallo and all the rest of those criminals, alright, that this is for the sake of humanity and no other reason. And believe me, it hurts.
And this is in the hope that it'll save the lives of millions of individuals who will die because of the greatest lie ever told. Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the "covid" plandemic revealed that "viruses" may not exist as we think. Event 201, a pandemic simulation held just before the outbreak, mirrored what unfolded. The initial fear was fueled by footage of people collapsing in China, which was never replicated elsewhere. The PCR tests showed that most positives were asymptomatic, exposing the situation's fraud. Vaccines didn't prevent illness, and the media labeled vaccinated individuals who got sick as “breakthrough cases.” New variants kept the fear alive every few months.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
The "covid" plandemic was the best time to realize "viruses" do not exist:🧵 1. Event 201 "pandemic" simulation conducted 2 months prior was exactly what happened during "covid". 2. Fear footage of people collapsing on streets in China. 3. PCR test showed 90% of positives had no symptoms. 4. Vaccines did not prevent anything. 5. "Virus" kept changing every month.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
On October 18, 2019, one month before the plandemic, this "pandemic" simulation Event 201, was conducted by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. https://t.co/6LHLFWkImL
Video Transcript AI Summary
The pandemic emergency board convened on 12/18/2019, amidst exponentially growing cases (4.2 million) and deaths (240,000). Models predicted 12 million cases and 1 million deaths by mid-January. Financial markets were down 15% due to pandemic fears.
Disinformation on social media, spread by state-sponsored groups and individuals seeking financial gain, fueled violence and distrust. Experts debated controlling information access versus promoting accurate public health messaging. Health workers faced attacks due to false rumors, and pharmaceutical companies were accused of creating the virus. Misinformation was ubiquitous, with governments contradicting each other.
The board discussed strategies to ensure reliable information reaches the public and to combat false information, including flooding the zone with accurate data. Suggestions included leveraging trusted employers, engaging traditional media, and partnering with social media platforms. Speakers emphasized the importance of community trust, faith-based organizations, and clear communication from international bodies like the WHO. Concerns were raised about governments spreading misinformation and the need for international cooperation to address disinformation campaigns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. We will now advance three weeks to the fourth and final meeting of the pandemic emergency board on 12/18/2019.
Speaker 1: Okay. Thank you for reconvening. And let's get an update from doctor Rivers.
Speaker 2: In the last three weeks, case numbers have continued to grow exponentially. We now have an estimated four point two million cases and two hundred and forty thousand deaths. Almost every country is now reporting cases, and those who aren't may simply not have the resources to conduct surveillance. We don't see any change in the rate of rapid spread, and models estimate that we could have more than twelve million cases and close to a million deaths by mid January. We're not sure how big this could get, but there's no end in sight.
Financial markets are universally down by 15% or more on the year. Fear of a catastrophic pandemic and uncertainty about the capacity for governments to respond and remain viable are fueling investor uncertainty.
Speaker 1: We have called this meeting today because of major strategic problems around communication that are happening globally. And here's a media debate that just happened on air today.
Speaker 3: Alarming news emerging from social media companies today about the CAPS pandemic. Twitter and Facebook are reporting they've identified and deleted a disturbing number of accounts dedicated to spreading disinformation about the outbreak. For more on this,
Speaker 4: we go to our correspondent, Catalina Parks. Chen, these accounts were created by several state sponsored groups intending to sow political discord, and some individuals are seemingly seeking to gain financial advantages. Violence against health care workers and minority populations has been increasing. A recent riot highlights the real danger in these posts. Countries are reacting in different ways as to how best to manage the overwhelming amounts of dis- and misinformation circulating over the internet.
In some cases, limited internet shutdowns are being implemented to quell panic. Thank you, Catalina. For more on this, we
Speaker 3: are joined by experts on crisis communications and social media, Kevin McAleese and Sara Lee.
Speaker 5: To me, it is clear countries need to make strong efforts to manage both mis- and disinformation. We know social media companies are working around the clock to combat these disinformation campaigns. The task of identifying every bad actor is immense. And experts agree that new disinformation campaigns are being generated every day. This is a huge problem that's going to keep us from ending the pandemic and might even lead to the fall of governments, as we saw in the Arab Spring.
If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it's the right choice.
Speaker 6: I agree with Kevin. This is a big problem and doesn't even account for the massive amounts of misinformation being generated by legitimate users about the pandemic. But it's not just trolls who are spreading the fake news. It's often political leaders themselves. Who's to judge what's real or not?
Would we trust every government to separate truth from lies?
Speaker 5: I think this is more than just keeping the bad information out. It's also about making sure real public health information reaches the public. News is found from outlets other than social media. News organizations, public health groups and companies need to help people take the right actions to protect themselves by promoting accurate, real information about the outbreak.
Speaker 1: Okay. For more on this, we're gonna get a briefing from our communications expert, doctor Sell.
Speaker 7: Global health experts have highlighted that dis and misinformation are wreaking havoc on the CAPS response. Health workers are under attack in a number of locations due to rumors that they are purposely spreading this disease, and response efforts in many places have had to be suspended because of concerns around violence. Pharmaceutical companies are being accused of introducing the caps virus so they can make money on drugs and vaccines and have seen public faith in their products plummet. Unrest due to false rumors and divisive messaging is rising and is exacerbating exacerbating spread of the disease as levels of trust fall and people stop cooperating with response efforts. This is a massive problem, one that threatens governments and trusted institutions.
Polls have shown that mis and disinformation are ubiquitous. At least 90% of the public has been exposed to these messages. At the same time, misinformation messages come from a variety of sources, even government officials. And often governments are contradicting one another. We know that social media is now the primary way that many people get their news, so interruptions to these platforms could curb the spread of misinformation but could also limit access to information from legitimate sources.
Health ministries around the world are attempting to combat mis and disinformation by amplifying public health messaging through social and traditional media, but they are being outpaced by false and misleading information. National governments are considering or have already implemented a range of interventions to combat misinformation. Some governments have taken control of national access to the Internet. Others are censoring websites and social media content, and a small number have shut down Internet access completely to prevent the spread of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrests.
Other countries have taken a more moderate approach and have focused on promoting fact checking efforts and working with traditional media outlets, yet these approaches are limited in scope. Social media companies report that they're doing all they can to limit the use of their platforms for nefarious or misleading purposes. But this is a technically difficult problem, and false, misleading, or half true information is difficult to sort without limiting potentially true messages. The bottom line is that members of the public no longer know who to trust. Both the misinformation and the measures to control it have led to a crisis of confidence.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Doctor. Sowell. So here's the policy crisis for this meeting of the Board. How can governments, international businesses, international organizations ensure that reliable information is getting to the public and prevent highly damaging and false information to the extent that's possible about the pandemic from spreading and causing deepening crisis around the world. How much control of information should there be and by whom and how can false information be effectively challenged?
And what if that false information is coming from companies or from governments? So your views are welcome.
Speaker 8: So I would start by pursuing where trust exists in the ecosystem. Jane, in a prior meeting, mentioned that there's considerable trust by employees of their employer, and that's been borne out by our own trust barometer in the last several years, where there is, it's extraordinary the amount of trust given to the employer, and coupled with that in times of crisis as we're living, the role of the CEO and the trust given to the CEO for advocacy and for advancement of accurate information is considerable. I would marry the business leadership of the employer with business leadership organizations, such as the BRT and like enterprises around the globe, but I also think we're at a moment where the social media platforms have to step forward and recognize the moment to assert that they're a technology platform and not a broadcaster is over. They, in fact, have to be a participant in broadcasting accurate information and partnering with the scientific and health communities to counterweight, if not flood the zone, of accurate information, because to try to put the genie back in the bottle of the misinformation and disinformation is nigh impossible. So flood.
Speaker 1: Flood good information. Okay. Others? Yeah. Jane?
Speaker 9: Yeah. So can I agree with that? And my fact did come from the Edelman Trust Index, you'll be pleased to know. But also borne out by the work I've done as a CEO in my time. Can I also add that I think there are real technology opportunities here?
I I personally do not believe that trying to shut things down in terms of information is either practical or desirable. And we do have, I think, a couple of strategies that are available to us. One of which is the flood strategy. Second of which is relying and informing and equipping trusted, sources of information with the facts so they can then pass that on. But we also need to actually think about a technological answer to this.
So there is work that's being done to actually create algorithms to sift through information on these kind of social media platforms. And I know that, the Gates Foundation and others are funding organizations to work on things like this in order that people can actually have more confidence in the sources that they will use in any event. So I think both a detailed solution working with individuals, but then also thinking about technology is something we have to advance.
Speaker 1: Hi, Steve.
Speaker 10: So looping back into the trust barometer, last year in Davos, it was released that trust in traditional media sources has grown while trust in social media sources has gone down specifically after the last elections in The United States. So I think one of the ways that we need to approach this is to make sure that we have the right representatives on traditional media networks in order to portray our side of the story and make sure that there there isn't misinformation. I agree with Jane that shutting down internet is only going to cause extra panic and extra anxiety. In fact, that staff tells me places where internet access has been shut down, there's unrest growing. So we're not only dealing with this specific situation but really people not trusting their governments at this point.
And so I think we really need to make sure, one, from a news perspective that that information being is being disseminated correctly and that we have the right resources out there to provide this information. I also think that there is a good point in trusting in employees, in your employers. There are lots of communications channel, for example, during the Ebola crisis at Texas Children's Hospital. We had daily briefings with the CDC to tell us what the situation was. And because of the daily briefings we used between the intranet, internal global communications, and town halls, we used those sources to be able to disseminate information and make sure that our employees knew exactly what was going on coming straight from the source, whether it was from our CEO, our chief nursing officer, others within the hospital.
Speaker 1: Okay, do want chime Chris? I'm sorry.
Speaker 11: No, I think a complimentary tactic too is to tap faith based organizations and civil society and other institutions to recruit them also to basically, almost at a grassroots level, continue to basically have the integrity of the information.
Speaker 12: Todd, just to pick up on the daily briefings or twice daily briefings. During H1N1, WHO filled the parking lot in Geneva with the global press and provided them daily updates on what was happening. And I think that's that's that's a manifestation of flood, meaning you have to lead and lead regularly. And I think in the terms of the content is what we know and point to where communications have actually been pretty good. I think we projected the exponential increase in this quite well, and therefore, there's legitimacy to what's being communicated.
And so be clear about what's being communicated that we know and that is right, but also be very clear about communicating what is absolutely wrong and being clear about that, and then also being clear about uncertainty and that that's being managed. So I think in those three domains, very important not to deny, but to speak to them very clearly in the context of a daily briefing from, in this case, I can't imagine any other institution than WHO, being the focal point.
Speaker 1: Martin, Chris, come down the slide.
Speaker 13: Thank you. I fully agree that this is pure crisis communication and crisis communication today, also social media is part of it. And just to limit or even stop social media would create a huge damage. And we should use it, we should get it on our side, we should work together with them and we should try to avoid this misinformation. And another topic is, I mean, our industry, there are indications, meanwhile, that we are getting this social conspiracy theory, the topic that we are part of this conspiracy theory that we are supporting this, that wealthy countries will spread out caps to poorer countries.
And this is clearly thing of social media that could be directed via clear crisis communication and confirmed and regular updated information. So I also agree with Matthew, companies responsibility that the CEO talks to the staff, the CEO improves this information flow, and then you have a chance to get it channeled.
Speaker 1: So in this case, are governments do you think governments are at the point where they need to require social media companies to operate in a certain way? I hear you saying social media companies should not be impaired, but are they do they need to operate under different conditions? I think Matt alluded to that as well.
Speaker 13: Yes, I would say that there are specific conditions now and we have to find a way to cooperate and we have to find solutions for this, but not to hamper them.
Speaker 1: Chris?
Speaker 14: So I just want to build on Ed's comment about the importance of civil society and faith based communities. I think, you know, in addition to employers, people trust their neighbors, trust their local community organizations. With three million cases in The Americas, you know that local communities around the countries have been responding, whether it's to manage day care so people can stay in school or go to work. So, you know, while the social media can provide better quality information, I think actually local community organizations can help individuals understand how to filter out some of the noise and to act on the good information that's there. I think it's an important lesson that we've learned recently, we're learning as we speak, in East Africa with the Ebola outbreak.
If you don't have the community trust and engagement, you can't deliver even effective countermeasures, even when you have them. So I think the importance of local community, perhaps married to and as a filter for helping to discern the truth from the misinformation on technology platforms is going to be an important part of this response.
Speaker 1: Steve, Brad, and then we'll go down the table here.
Speaker 15: Just two points. First is that we have to recognize that we are all susceptible to misinformation based on our prob beliefs and experience. And I think with the social media platforms, there's an opportunity to understand who it is that's susceptible in what form to misinformation. So I think there's an opportunity to collect data from that communication mechanism. The second thing is, with that ability, we can identify false information more quickly.
We are actually receiving reports about people trying treatments that are purported to be effective, but are actually harmful. And the quicker that's recognized and can be countered, fewer people will fall susceptible to those things.
Speaker 1: Okay, thanks. Brad?
Speaker 16: Yeah, don't want be repetitive. I agree with almost everything that was said. But when we talk about our health, who do we typically trust? Our physician. And we're not talking about that right now, so we need physicians and the medical community really out there on the forefront talking about this.
I remember I had access to local news in Atlanta when the patient was taken care of for Ebola that came back, and physicians were on there nightly talking about, you know, don't panic, it's okay, this isn't going to go spread, so I would add physicians to it.
Speaker 17: Okay. Yeah. Some important news to share from our member companies. Rumors are actually spreading that the antivirals are causing gaps, and so patients are not taking them anymore. And this is particularly an area where we have government mistrust.
On the other hand, it's interesting because we are doing clinical trials in new antiretrovirals and in fact in vaccines and social media, including Facebook, is actually enhancing recruitment. People are going to it and they're actually seeking information on where they can participate and sign up. And so I sort of wonder that maybe we're in the mistake of reporting and counting all the fatalities and infections and we're not sharing with people what are the wins. Know, who are patient advocates that can say what worked for me and maybe you should try that? I think we have an opportunity here.
Speaker 1: Okay. George, and then Gabriel. Yes.
Speaker 18: By now, we have more cases in China and also death cases reported. And also my staff told me that before there's misinformation and there's some belief, people believe this is a man made pharmaceutical company made the virus. So there are some violations and even, you know, that is because of this misinformation. As a, you know, from, like, the CDC, and I don't know if Steve believe but Steve agree with me. When you are doing the field work and you like to do some so called TOT, training of trainers.
So we only need to train the health workers, the health care workers, their access to the patients, to the public. So make sure they got the right information. Sometimes the healthcare workers, they know something, but if they are not well trained, they might give the wrong information, but also they might say something, oh, I don't know. Even I don't know, that could hurt. So when I remember, such a situation reminded me.
When I was in Sierra Leone, when I was interviewed by radio, the national radio, I was asked by one of the audience to say, okay, we believe Ebola was man made, is transported from somewhere. So this is, I think this is very important we do the TOT, so make sure the healthcare workers have the right information.
Speaker 1: Okay, thank you. I very
Speaker 19: much agree with that. So, I mean, I think I agree with a lot of what's been said. I'd just add to it maybe by saying that I think one of the things we want to do is work with telecommunication companies to actually ensure that everybody has access to the kind of communications that we're interested in providing because that's going be critical for dealing with, you know, obviously the explosion of the disease. And then another issue, I suppose, is just through that, if you have a trusted source, I believe in the idea that we shouldn't be trying to control communication, but rather flood the zone, in a sense, with a trusted source that then is influential community leaders as well as health workers, as Brad noted, and others on these issues in order to try to amplify the message that's coming through. And I think Tim's absolutely right.
I've certainly seen the value of communicating constantly on these issues so as to continue deal with, know, sort of the vacuum that can be created in this circumstance. But then also with the comments made about the fact that for all of the disinformation that will be put out, it's gonna be important to actually have a response to those questions and to those concerns, as Steven said. And I understand from staff that actually there are also intelligence sources identifying multiple foreign disinformation campaigns and so on. But it's all a part of a larger piece which is to say that every time there is something that comes out that is in fact false information that is starting to actually hamper our ability to address the pandemic, then we need to be able to respond quickly to it.
Speaker 1: So a number of comments here. People want to react to what Avril just said? I see a couple of fingers just went up. Matt, you need some?
Speaker 15: I think
Speaker 1: just to build a little
Speaker 8: bit on what Avril said is, I think as in previous conversations where we've talked about centralization around management of information or public health needs, there needs to be a centralized response around the communications approach that then is cascaded to informed advocates represented in the NGO communities, the medical professionals, etc.
Speaker 1: You mean centralized internationally?
Speaker 8: Centralized on an international basis, because I think there needs to be a central repository of data, facts and key messages.
Speaker 1: Tim, do you want to comment on that and then we'll go back to regular order here?
Speaker 12: Yeah. I I think one important thing is it needs to there needs to be a sense of two way communication, which is people on the front lines may be finding out that actually the system is not working as it should. And I think there should be a culture in the communications to feedback to authorities places where the system is broken down, where supplies are short, where there are no health workers, where hospitals are dysfunctional, etcetera. Because that and then with some credible investigation process, which is that then values the the the client. The second dimension of it, think, that's really important is that is to get individual narratives on this.
I mean, the fact is that most people will survive, and that's probably not a widespread public perception. And so people who have lived and survived and can say that they got good care or that they were treated appropriately will help build confidence in the in the system in a way that's perhaps the data doesn't do as effectively.
Speaker 1: Ashti, Latoya, Sofia, and then Jane.
Speaker 10: So I think a couple of things we have to consider are even before this began, the anti vaccine movement was very strong, and this is something specifically through social media that has spread. So as we do the research to, come up with the right vaccines to help prevent the, continuation of this, how do we get the right information out there? How do we communicate the right information to ensure that the public has trust in these vaccines that we're creating, and secondly, news organizations in some countries are right now under a lot of pressure from their governments to provide politically favorable news, and so we have to think about you know, this isn't just The United States where we sometimes take the freedom of press for granted. There are countries where the news organizations are owned by the government and how are they disseminating information and what do we need to be thinking about? How do we communicate with those governments to ensure that misinformation and disinformation is not being spread.
Speaker 20: That goes along with her. I've received information from my staff saying there's they're confused about the different authoritory public health messages that are coming out from all the different sectors, the countries, the states, and different cities. And they're concerned about the differences, what the World Health Organization is saying versus what their government is saying and what the total consensus are. So with that being said, looking at hotels from that perspective, we're in a bind in knowing how to proceed.
Speaker 1: I see. Sophia?
Speaker 21: Thank you. I wanted to I mean, the discussion is focusing on mis and disinformation, but I think what's important to counter some of that is to actually put out information or good good news stories of people who have actually beat the disease or best practices in other parts of the world that is is delivering on results and sharing that. But also, I agree on the point on having a centralized source of information and a world body that could have, garner the respect of everyone, and I think the WHO in this instance might be that source of information. And again, using the UN networks on the ground, and many of these countries has a UN presence through its resident coordinator systems. And I think based on the Edelman trust barometer, the UN still enjoys a lot of trust around the world.
It's a good bet. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Thanks, Jane.
Speaker 9: So I I just want to
Speaker 1: I'm back.
Speaker 9: Focus if I could have for a second on why we communicate, what the purpose of this communication is. So there seem to be several elements to this conversation, one of which is to get the facts, however you define them, out there. But let's be completely clear. We have known for many years that tobacco kills you if you consume it. It's a fact.
It's it's a crapshoot whether you're gonna be in the fifty percent proportion who's gonna die very young, but we know this as a fact. There are some things we know that are widely held. Doesn't mean it always changes people's behavior. So I think we should also focus in a conversation about communication, about what the purpose of that communication is, and think about what we know about incentivizing the kind of behaviors we want to see. I agree with Tim completely.
It needs to be two way. So governments and people who are organizing service delivery, businesses who are trying to operate in this environment, they can do that optimally. But we should also think in a communication sense, it's not just about handing people a piece of knowledge. It's also about how we incentivize them to manage their behaviors, which in any communicable disease outbreak, behavior of one sort will minimize your chance of getting a disease versus behavior of another sort, may maximize that chance.
Speaker 14: Thanks. Chris? Yeah, I just want to come back to the community. Know, judging from the statistics, we currently have four million survivors. We may in a month have eleven million survivors.
Assuming this is like other respiratory pathogens, they're now immune. And they live in the communities, almost by definition, that are affected. So can we turn the survivors into an effective community based source of accurate information? They're going be the least likely to be wanting spread false information. They're going to be motivated by having survived this outbreak and knowing loved ones who are also affected.
I think they can become a very effective force for intervention at the community level.
Speaker 1: Thanks. I'm gonna turn to Lavon. I just wanna ask one other question to think about as Lavon's commenting. We've talked a lot about misinformation and flooding good information. We've just started to talk a bit about disinformation and the strategy around that.
And Avril or others, after Lavan comments, if you have any additional thoughts about the particular approaches to disinformation that may be distinguished from misinformation, it would be good to hear about those. But Lavan?
Speaker 22: Yes. So I've received a note to say that some bad actors are actually using social media to spread rumors about specific companies in order to profit from short selling. So along the lines of what we've been talking about, this is going to cause companies to come up now to get some of their screen time as well because they need to spread the correct information. But one thing we haven't spoken about, and I'm wondering whether it's time to talk about this is a step up from the part of the governments on enforcement actions against fake news, right? Some of us this new regulations that come in place about how we deal with fake news and maybe this is a time for us to showcase some cases where we are able to bring forward some bad actors and leave it before the courts to decide whether they have actually spread some fake news.
Speaker 1: So we have about three minutes left for this discussion. I just wanna throw one more question out for your final thoughts on what if it is, as some people have raised, governments that are spreading misinformation either inadvertently or to some political advantage. How do we work around that with international organizations or business? Are there particular things that people haven't mentioned already that are worth talking about? But does anyone wanna talk about either that or disinformation or other topics in the last couple of minutes?
Speaker 18: Sure. Sorry, go ahead.
Speaker 19: No, please.
Speaker 18: So I want to talk a little bit about science. I want to follow Chris' talk. You know, because that's a very good challenge. We have survivors. Because we have so many survivors, the epidemic already fall two months.
We have all these modern technologies and the platforms, and it's time to think about it, to try to isolate the human antibodies for this, because this is a very serious pandemic, but we want also to see the future. That will help science based information. Thanks. Ariel?
Speaker 19: Sure. If you have state sponsored disinformation, there's obviously additional tools that you can bring to bear to try to address that situation, not the least of which is bringing together other countries to effectively, you know, take action against them for the kind of campaigns that they're propagating. But it's But generally, I mean, would say the disinformation The line between disinformation and misinformation is not always an easy one to find, and the reality is the greatest, you know, way to impact it, in my experience, is not to let it sit. So in other words, find your trusted interlocutors that are capable of saying this is not acceptable, this is in fact the truth, here is the information, and I think the community of survivors is one example, but there's a whole series, employers, trusted faith leaders, health workers, and so on can be part of that. In addition, obviously, you want to work with the private sector and those who are spreading information generally to see that they can bring things down that are in fact lies or, you know, false information that's being put forward as a way to minimize it.
But having a source, a national source, an international source, other trusted sources, and really guiding everybody towards that information is one of the most effective ways to deal with a situation like that.
Speaker 1: Great. I have Martin, Tim
Speaker 13: If it comes back to misinformation on a level of governments of countries, then we need, as Sofia mentioned, trustable international organizations, UN, WHO, and they have to come together to get together to spread this trust and to work against this. We cannot hold governments from doing misinformation on their own. So I fully trust on disinformation organizations.
Speaker 12: Tom, just to build on that, I think you're right. It's important that the UN and WHO remain very clear, But when they challenge governments directly, they often get into this issue of sovereignty. And so I think it's really important not to have that as the only response. I think it's really critical to think about soft power influence, which is other, influential who can call up the head of state, or, powerful constituencies within those countries. We've seen this in the context of mobilizing religious leaders in the context of polio, or specific business leaders where you can soften perhaps a very hard line from government, through less more stealth entry points rather than trying to punish them through the international health regulations or something like that.
Speaker 1: Great. And I Adrian, I think last comment.
Speaker 17: I think it's important to think about what atypical players in the private sector can we bring to bear in this. So bringing multinational pharmaceutical companies to talk about why who are self interested about why their products are safe could be seen as non credible. But if I think about the champion for TB in South Africa was Nando's chicken. And so I think as we think about these large atypical players who have no credible vested interest in in this issue, but have a strong voice that's economically differentiated for their governments as well in their country. They're gonna listen
Speaker 1: to them with
Speaker 17: some respect. I think it will be very important. Okay.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have to leave that conversation there. Thank you all for another very highly valuable discussion. We'll take what you've advised, bring it to the attention of leaders and we deeply appreciate all you have done here in these meetings. This is concluded.
Speaker 0: Great. So that concludes the exercise portion of the event. How did this pandemic turn out? We please watch this epilogue video, and you can see the outcome.
Speaker 23: The outcome of the CAPS pandemic in event two zero one was catastrophic. Sixty five million people died in the first eighteen months. The outbreak was small at first and initially seemed controllable, but then it started spreading in densely crowded and impoverished neighborhoods of mega cities. From that point on, the spread of the disease was explosive. Within six months, cases were occurring in nearly every country.
At first, wealthy countries with advanced health care and public health systems were primarily able to limit the spread of the disease within their borders. As systems became overwhelmed, however, no countries were able to control its spread. And the disease affected people of all socioeconomic status, from the very poor to the extremely rich, from sanitation workers to CEOs and national leaders. The economic consequences were dramatic. The high death toll and even greater numbers of sick hurt productivity in many industries.
Manufacturers were having trouble filling orders and countless companies in the service sector simply shut down. The global economy was in a freefall. The GDP down 11%. Stock markets around the world plummeted between 2040% and headed into a downward cycle of fear and low expectation. Businesses were not borrowing.
Banks were not lending. Everyone was just hoping to hunker down and weather the storm. While nearly all businesses were affected, certain sectors were especially hard hit. Travel, finance, service, manufacturing, health care and insurance among them, with some major companies going bankrupt. And there were seismic societal consequences as well.
The world saw large scale protests and in some places riots. People were angry about the lack of access to health care and medicine, as well as governments' inability to protect them from the disease. This led to violent crackdowns in some countries and even martial law. Political upheaval became the rule across the globe. The public lost trust in their respective administrations.
Several governments fell while others were desperately striving to hold on to power. This spurred further crackdowns. Attempts to control media messaging originally aimed only at health related misinformation became used increasingly to quash political dissent. Economists say the economic turmoil caused by such a pandemic will last for years, perhaps a decade. The societal impacts, the loss of faith in government, the distrust of news, and the breakdown of social cohesion could last even longer.
We have to ask, did this need to be so bad? Are there things we could have done in the five to ten years leading up to the pandemic that would have lessened the catastrophic consequences? We believe the answer is yes. So are we as a global community now finally ready to do the hard work needed to prepare for the next pandemic.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
The "covid" plandemic started with footage of people collapsing in the streets in China which did not happen anywhere else. This was propaganda footage to incite fear and compliance around the world. https://t.co/dHPViXL60R
@_APWK_ - Luiz
The PCR exposed the fraud by revealing that the vast majority of people testing positive had no symptoms. https://t.co/A1viBdNVrS
@_APWK_ - Luiz
The media tried to hide the vaccine fraud by calling vaccinated people getting sick as “breakthrough cases” until they couldn’t hide it any more. Truth was, the vaccine was never tested to prevent any “virus.” https://t.co/wAMu2atiXA
@_APWK_ - Luiz
And as we all know, there was a new “variant” to be afraid of every few months. https://t.co/EbAh2DQwkL
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Want to start understanding how "viruses" not exist? This is a good place to start: https://t.co/nLTCrgO1Uf
Video Transcript AI Summary
Do you have an open mind? Consider that we live in a toxic world, where our cells respond to poisons by packaging and releasing damaged genetic material, called exosomes. This contrasts with the established theory of viruses, which are seen as non-living entities that can cause illness.
The coronavirus emerged when a respiratory illness was linked to a new RNA fragment found in patients. Testing methods, like PCR, amplify genetic material, but their arbitrary cutoff points can lead to misleading results. Cases like the Diamond Princess cruise ship show conflicting test results among close contacts, challenging the infectious virus theory.
Many who test positive remain asymptomatic, and some fluctuate between positive and negative results. This raises questions about the reliability of PCR tests and whether exosomes could be misidentified as viruses. Ultimately, how confident are you in these tests? Would you choose to be tested?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you have an open mind? Can you suspend judgment for a moment? Most people can't. But what if your job depends on it? What if the freedom to hug people depends on it?
What if your life depends on it? Here's a new theory. 1st, consider that we live in a world where everything is toxic. The soil, the water, the air, our food, even our medicines are toxic. Even stress can be toxic.
Now imagine that all these toxins are poisonous to us on a cellular level. Imagine that our cells have a defense and respond to the situation. Poisoned genetic material, either RNA or DNA, is packaged up and sent out of the cell in tiny balls of protein. Let's call these balls of genetic material exosomes. Let's imagine that exosomes can act as messages to alert other cells of a particular poison, and so all throughout the body more and more cells package up the poisoned material and release it.
Also, at certain times of the year due to temperature cycles, humans tend to purge a high number of these poisons genetic materials out of the body resulting in symptoms of illness. These exosomes neither cause illness nor are they infectious, though they do appear to spread throughout the body. Now that's exosome theory. Let's move on to the established theory of viruses. Viruses are generally regarded as not alive.
They have no cellular structure and do not reproduce on their own, though we do have trillions of them inside our bodies. They are tiny bits of genetic material, either RNA or DNA, packaged in tiny protein balls that appear to exit and enter cells. Sound familiar? We believe that some of these entities are infectious and pathogenic, transmitting amongst humans and reproducing inside our bodies, causing illness and death. So let's look at the situation for this coronavirus and compare what is happening to these two theories.
Let's first consider the origin story of the coronavirus. A group of people had a respiratory illness unresolved by antibiotics, so medical officials began looking, of course, for a virus. What they eventually found under the electron microscope were small protein balls being excreted by the cell. Okay. First comparison.
This would make sense in both exosome theory and virus theory. Then they searched for and found an RNA fragment that they had not seen before in some of these patients. This would make sense in both exosome theory and virus theory. Now they did not prove that they could infect somebody or an animal with a purified form of this so called virus. They simply assumed that this RNA fragment was the cause of the illness they saw in some patients, and they assumed it was contagious.
So do you know how the tests work? It's not a binary test like a pregnancy test. It's called a PCR test, and it involves amplifying genetic material by doubling it in dozens of cycles until you have billions or trillions of the original molecules, and then using those results to determine if you have enough of the identified RNA fragment to be considered positive. Here's the thing. At a certain point of amplification, every single person would test positive.
They use an arbitrary cutoff point where they stop doubling the material. That cutoff point is different amongst different tests for COVID 19. In fact, there were 10 different cutoff points amongst 33 tests approved by the FDA. Seems a little strange. Right?
You might find it interesting that the Nobel Prize winning inventor of the test did not believe it should be used to diagnose infectious illness, and perhaps you've heard about some of the problems with the test, such as the high rate of false positives. But in any case, let's say that after 37 times of doubling a specific genetic material they found in your body, they determine that you have enough of the RNA they are looking for to be considered positive. This could make sense in both exosome theory and virus theory, but clearly there are clusters of people getting ill. Look at New York City. It must be a virus.
However, if you are being poisoned by something in your environment, it's likely people near you are too. And if we commonly purge these poisons during specific times of the year, many people may have symptoms of illness all at once. This fits either theory. Now, here's where things get interesting. Let's go to the Diamond Princess cruise ship situation.
Did you know that people who were bunked together for days had conflicting positive and negative tests? How could one person have this highly infectious illness, but not transmit it to somebody bunking with them for days? This would make sense in exosome theory, where the balls of RNA are not contagious, but it would not make sense for virus theory where the balls of RNA are supposed to be highly infectious. Let's take a look at the first case of transmission in Illinois. A woman traveled to Wuhan, came back, and both she and her chronically ill husband ended up testing positive.
Medical authorities then tracked over 300 people who had had close contact with them to see who acquired the virus. And guess what? 0 positives. This again would make sense in exosome theory since exosomes are not contagious, but it would not make sense for virus theory where this is supposed to be an infectious virus. In fact, do you know that there are many documented cases all around the world of patients testing positive for this RNA fragment with no relevant travel history and no known possible contact with somebody who was infected?
These were people in the middle of nowhere, early on in this whole crisis, who suddenly were testing positive. This would make sense again in exosome theory, where the RNA is being produced as an immune response within our cells, but it would not make sense for virus theory where you are supposed to have had contact with somebody with the virus. What about the high levels of people testing positive who don't get sick? In fact, 80% of people testing positive are either asymptomatic or have slight cold symptoms. Why?
This would make sense in exosome theory since the RNA fragments are not the cause of the illness. But it would not make sense for virus theory where this virus is supposed to cause the illness. Things get even stranger. Did you know that some people go from testing positive to testing negative to testing positive again in a matter of days. That would make sense for exosome theory, where perhaps the cells are simply releasing more or less of these exosomes depending on certain conditions.
But it doesn't make sense in virus theory, where you are supposedly infected until you have rid yourself of the virus. So which of these theories seems more likely to you? What if you heard that there are virologists who believe that viruses are actually exosomes? What if I told you that doctors and other scientific experts also believe this? Ultimately, regardless of which theory you believe in at this point, the established infectious virus theory or the emerging theory of exosomes, how confident are you in the PCR test?
Are you really interested in having your life hinge on the results you get from this potentially meaningless test? Do you want your loved ones tested? Do you want to be tested? Or shall we perhaps refuse the test?
@_APWK_ - Luiz
As long as you believe in “viruses” they will keep trying to control you. https://t.co/U8khzGRwV0
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Fauci literally just said the "bird flu virus" can go into a pig and a "human flu virus" can also go into that pig, both "viruses" can then have sex and create a "human-bird-pig flu virus" that will be able to transmit from human to human. LOL https://t.co/zUoeYwBZ9r
Video Transcript AI Summary
The concerning issue is that the virus can infect multiple species, including pigs, which are often in close proximity to chickens and cows. This interaction raises the risk of a reassortment of viruses, potentially creating a new strain that combines the dangerous traits of H5N1 with the ability to spread between humans. Public health officials are particularly worried about this possibility due to the mixing of viruses in pigs. Although the current risk is considered low, the CDC emphasizes the need for vigilance as the situation could change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now let me tell you the sobering news. The sobering news is that that can change because the virus infects more than one species, and we know it can infect pigs. Pigs are on farms with chickens and with cows, and chickens and cows can infect with their virus a pig, and then a human virus can go into pig, and then you could get a reassortment of a virus that has some of the dangerous qualities of h five n one and some of the capability of spreading from human to human of a human virus. So that's what public health officials are concerned about, that when you have the circulation of this virus in multiple species, including a mixing bowl species like a pig, you might get a reassortment and a mutation that could make this something we really have to be concerned about. And that's the reason why the CDC says, although currently the risk in general is low, we still have to pay close attention to the possibility that that might change.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
The WHO wanted to use a global Digitized Vaccine Certificate to control your ability to live freely through vaccines. Look at how the WHO director Tedros spoke before and after the US elections. https://t.co/o3NMpX4rIA
Video Transcript AI Summary
The European Union developed a COVID-19 certification system to facilitate safe travel during the pandemic, which has now been adopted by WHO as part of a global digital health certification network. This network will initially include the COVID-19 certificate and will later expand to include other health documents. There is a need to address the challenges posed by anti-vaccine sentiments, as vaccines are effective and supported by evidence. WHO clarified that it did not impose any mandates during the pandemic, emphasizing its role in providing guidance and support to governments rather than enforcing policies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like many countries, the European Union made significant investments in COVID 19 certificates to help people move around as safely as possible during the pandemic. The European Union certification system was used by all 27 EU member states and more than 50 other countries. Building on the success of the EU system, WHO is proud today to launch the global digital health certification network. So thank you so much to European, Union for the excellent certification system that you have transferred to us and we have the chance to build on it. WHO will begin operations of the network today with the existing COVID-nineteen certificate as a global public good.
Soon after, we will expand this infrastructure by incorporating other use such as a digitized international certificate of vaccination, routine immunization cards and international patient summaries. But you know the, serious challenge that's posed by anti vaxxers, and I think we need to strategize to really push back because vaccines work. Vaccines affect adults. And we have signs, evidence on our side. I think it's time to be more aggressive in pushing back on anti vaxxers.
Think they use COVID as an opportunity and, you know, all the havoc they're they're creating.
Speaker 1: It is now official. CNN projects that Donald Trump has been elected president, defeating vice president Kamala Harris, and making a political comeback unlike any in modern American politics. Now The
Speaker 2: World Health Organization has become nothing more than a corrupt globalist scam paid for by the United States but owned and controlled by China. For this reason, it was my great honor to terminate America's relationship with the World Health Organization.
Speaker 0: A few moments later WHO did not impose anything on anyone during the COVID 19 pandemic. Not lockdowns, not mask mandates, not vaccine mandates. We don't have the power to do that. We don't want it, and we're not trying to get it. Our job is to support governments with evidence based guidance, advice, and when needed, supplies to help them protect their people.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
WHO director, Tedros wants to get more aggressive with anti-vaxxers. Anything you want to say to @DrTedros ? https://t.co/IslagvrqF6
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2022, over 14 million children missed vaccinations. Collaborating with partners like Gavi and UNICEF, we aim to reduce this number by 2030. However, we face significant challenges from anti-vaccine movements, which have gained traction, especially during COVID-19. It's crucial to strategize and push back against misinformation, as vaccines are effective and beneficial for both children and adults. We need to take a more assertive stance in countering the narratives propagated by anti-vaxxers to protect public health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: More than 14,000,000 children in 2022 did not receive a single dose of vaccine. Working together with partners like Gavi and UNICEF, we aim to have that number by 2,030. But you know the serious challenge that's posed by anti vaxxers, and I think we need to strategize to really push back because vaccines work. Vaccines affect adults. And we have signs, evidence on our side.
I think it's time to be more aggressive in pushing back on anti vaxxers. I think they use COVID as an opportunity and, you know, all the havoc they're they're creating.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas had his license revoked after releasing this vaccine study to the public. This is how many times more vaccinated children have a higher risk of these diseases than unvaccinated children. https://t.co/X2z82lqIkI
@_APWK_ - Luiz
‘They’re frozen in time. The shots froze them in time.' Two-year-old twin boys who each received multiple vaccines when they were four months old — and haven’t developed any abilities since. https://t.co/r4sibAZLEE
Video Transcript AI Summary
A 2-month-old boy's life is described as destroyed after receiving DTaP, HIB, and polio vaccines at 4 months. The speaker states the child is frozen in time due to the shots. At a 2-month well-baby visit, a child receives DPT (3 antigens), HIB, Prevnar, Hep B, polio, and rotavirus, totaling 6 shots and 8 antigens. Some people interviewed had to remain outside the bus due to their condition. The speaker says, "We are going to stop this because this see? She knows," while addressing a child named Kelsey.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The DTaP, the HIB, the polio. How old is that at this stage?
Speaker 1: 4 months? 4 months. And it's it's very hard to see
Speaker 0: it. Yeah.
Speaker 1: It's a beautiful boy's life is destroyed. Yep. Do they I mean, they've just been sitting staring. Is this is what their life is like? Or do they do I mean, I'm sorry to be so blunt.
Yeah. No.
Speaker 0: This is it.
Speaker 1: I've never seen anything like this.
Speaker 0: This is it. They're 2 year old, 2 month olds. You know, they they're frozen in time. The shots froze them in time. Let's just say a 2 month well baby visit.
There's a DPT. That's 3 shots, 3 antigens. HIP, Pravnard, d, hep b, polio, rotavirus, 6 shots, 8 antigens. Other people who couldn't even come on to the bus, who had to stay outside the bus, and we had to move all of our equipment outside and interview them there.
Speaker 1: We are going to stop this because this see? She knows. It's alright, Kelsey. See, children tell Spence got your back.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Vax vs. Unvax. Study done by pediatrician, Dr. Paul Thomas. His license was taken away after releasing this study. https://t.co/kNTxYgcoD3
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Major red flag 🚩 if this didn’t wake you up, nothing will. https://t.co/EfqXviAjVJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Double vaxxed, boosted, flu shot, and shingle shot, the speaker still gets their period. They traveled to Mexico twice, did shows and meet and greets, and never got COVID. They believe Jesus clearly loves them the most.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Brag, I don't care, but I want you to know double vaxxed booster flu shot, and I'm gonna be honest, I have the shingle shot too. And I still get my period. What? Yes. Traveled, went to Mexico twice, did shows, meet and greets, never got COVID, clearly Jesus loves me the most.
Seriously. So nice. So nice.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
"The experts" were not wrong. They intentionally lied to millions of people. https://t.co/keXYeVEfQ4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Initially, all vaccines released under emergency use authorization by the FDA were considered outstanding. The J&J vaccine carries a risk of life-threatening blood clots. Despite claims that COVID poses zero threat to healthy children, vaccination for children was urged. Two mRNA vaccines were considered a three-dose vaccine.
Two doses were found to be insufficient for emergency room visits and hospitalizations, necessitating a third immunization. A fourth immunization was suggested as a potential innovative solution. The numbers are trending up again, so a new bivalent booster is recommended for everyone ages 12 and older. Those over 50 who have had two boosters more than 2-4 months prior may need a third booster, a fifth immunization. Boosters may not be holding up as well as desired, potentially requiring boosters every few months.
Disinformation campaigns have promoted fake concepts of herd immunity and discredited masks. Vaccinating is considered our last hope. The single most impactful thing is to be fully boosted, preferably twice boosted. Monkeypox is accelerating among men who have sex with men, though sources disagree on whether it is sexually transmitted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the things that we're not hearing a lot about is the unique potential safety problem of coronavirus vaccines. And then something changed. Any vaccine released by emergency use authorization by the FDA is an outstanding, vaccine.
Speaker 1: J and j's vaccine has a risk of life threatening blood clots.
Speaker 2: When you hear the beep, that's the sound of safety.
Speaker 0: So don't overthink it. They're they're both really good vac they're all really good vaccines. Get vaccinated now.
Speaker 2: I gotta call now.
Speaker 0: If you wait, it's gonna be really too late to protect your child.
Speaker 2: If this was your child, what happens next could make it the worst day of your life.
Speaker 1: So even though COVID poses zero threat to healthy children
Speaker 0: Vaccinate your children.
Speaker 2: Do the right thing. Be safe and not sorry.
Speaker 0: I'm strongly recommending for adolescents to get their 2 doses of vaccine fully immunized after those two doses.
Speaker 2: Advanced technology that can help save lives.
Speaker 0: This is gonna be a long lasting vaccine. A long lasting vaccine.
Speaker 3: A few moments later.
Speaker 0: We're seeing that 2 doses is not holding up well for emergency room visits. It's not holding up well for hospitalizations.
Speaker 1: Here we go.
Speaker 0: Again. Everyone's going to need a booster. You need that 3rd immunization. Triple the amount. Get that 3rd immunization.
The 2 mRNA vaccines were always a 3 dose vaccine. The 2 mRNA vaccines were always a 3 dose vaccine. We've I've always said this is a 3 dose vaccine. We've I've always said this is a 3 dose vaccine. This is a 3 dose vaccine.
Speaker 2: But I'm not done yet.
Speaker 0: That third immunization, the problem is it's not holding up. So we may have to look at sort of innovative solutions.
Speaker 3: Oh god. Not this again.
Speaker 0: A 4th immunization Oh, boy. Just just to keep them to keep them going. Keep the country, going. We have to consider some out of the box things. A 4th immunization
Speaker 2: 4th A
Speaker 0: 4th immunization get that second boost. A second boost to keep the country, going. I've made that recommendation a 4th immunization.
Speaker 2: But I'm still not done.
Speaker 3: One semester later.
Speaker 0: Unfortunately, the numbers are starting to trend up again, so the hospitalizations are up. And so the most important message that I have this morning is get your new bivalent booster.
Speaker 4: Willie and Lee's were saying they got their booster, and I was like, oh, I need to get mine. And then I found out they they're talking about the 3rd shot. And is that the bivalent, or is it the 4th booster, or does it matter? Like
Speaker 0: Don't worry so much about the number of
Speaker 2: There's no wrong way to use it.
Speaker 0: You have to get it. This new bivalent booster
Speaker 2: You can double or triple stack them.
Speaker 0: The new bivalent one is is doing a much better job. You have to get a booster. Yeah. You need to get this new bivalent boost. That bivalent booster for COVID.
Speaker 5: But does everyone ages 12 and older need a booster?
Speaker 0: The answer is yes. Yes. And by the way, if you're over 50 and have gotten 2 boosters and more than 4 2 or 2 to 4 months out, you're gonna need a 3rd booster as well, a 5th immunization. 5th. I don't think we're gonna need an annual booster like flu.
Speaker 1: Eventually. Doctor Hotez supports yearly boosters just like flu.
Speaker 2: But I'm still not done.
Speaker 0: It looks as though the boosters are not holding up quite as well as we'd like. And and and I think our think thinking is going to change and that what's going to happen is every, you know, few months, we may need another booster.
Speaker 2: Uh-uh. Uh-uh. Perfect results each and every time.
Speaker 0: I know we just could not overcome that massive disinformation campaign. These fake concepts of herd immunity and discrediting masks.
Speaker 6: Well, doctor Hotez, but you are a national treasure.
Speaker 0: It is picking off young people like we've never seen. Doctor Peter Hotez, that was extremely informative. Disinformation that you're hearing that kids are fine, it's nonsense. Kids need to get that vaccination. You health care workers have been our saviors.
Watch out for that misinformation. Doctor Peter Hotez is probably one of the smartest people on this topic. And if you haven't gotten your 5 and ups vaccinated yet, now's the time to do that.
Speaker 4: Doctor Peter Hotez, thank you for saving the world.
Speaker 0: We also support giving that 3rd immunization for the 12 to 17 year old. People have to feel safe.
Speaker 4: Doctor Hotez, you are a voice of reason.
Speaker 0: Take down the fake information. These fake concepts of herd immunity. Our last hope is to vaccinate our way through this. Make certain that everybody's vaccinated, including their kids. That's the single most important thing right now the American people have to do.
Speaker 6: Doctor Peter Hotez, who's the person that we like to go to, for the sort of expertise.
Speaker 0: The single most impactful thing you can do is make certain that you're fully boosted and preferably too boosted.
Speaker 2: Later.
Speaker 4: Buckypox is a global emergency.
Speaker 0: And it's accelerating, among a specific social network of of men who have sex with men, not because it's sexually transmitted.
Speaker 1: Monkeypox is sexually transmitted, almost exclusively.
Speaker 5: Before we let you go, we have to stop and applaud you because I didn't a lot of MSNBC viewers who have watched you constantly for the last 3 years or so and and have come to trust you. I don't know if they fully appreciate what you have done.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
How hospitals murdered people during the plandemic: 1. They “tested” people. 2. Labeled them as “covid” 3. Sedated and intubated them. 4. Killed them. 5. Labeled death as “covid deaths.” 6. Celebrated with a dance routine. https://t.co/P9pbIBsY1x
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses anger at the emptiness of a hospital in Gloucestershire during a supposed medical pandemic. They state the hospital is "empty as hell" and "absolutely dead," with "nobody even in there." The speaker questions how this is possible during a pandemic and claims it is "fake news."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is going to get worse. As you can see, it's empty as hell. No one's in there, guys. It's absolutely dead. Not many people are in there at all.
If it goes down, and there's there's a hospital. We've just been locked down in Gloucestershire for an empty hospital. Look. I am so angry. So there's nobody even in there?
Nobody's in there. Nobody's in the hospital? How is that possible, though, in a medical pandemic? That's fake news, though, by. That's fake news, though, by.
That's fake news, though, by.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
mRNA Vaxxers literally have toxic lipid nanoparticles in their ovaries and testicles. https://t.co/xz7WqhBtjJ
@_APWK_ - Luiz
I can’t believe people saw this and said “yea, give me two of those” https://t.co/jRQq84dWLY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tiffany Doper, the manager in the CCU, states that her team is in the COVID unit. Therefore, her team will be getting the first chances to get the vaccine. She then states that she is feeling dizzy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Name is Tiffany Doper, and I am the manager in CCU. For my team, we are in the COVID unit. So, therefore, you know, my team will be getting first chances to get the vaccine. And I know that, it's really I'm sorry. I'm feeling really dizzy.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Update from Alexis Lorenze’s father: Today has been “highly difficult” but she is getting through it. Pain is rough without medication. Never. Get. Vaccinated. https://t.co/rPazpmq5aC
reSee.it AI Summary
I injected myself with HIV-positive blood to challenge what I believe is a massive fraud in medicine. My aim is to expose the truth about HIV, similar to how Dr. Walter Reed demonstrated the truth about yellow fever. Despite the risks, I tested negative multiple times.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Dr. Robert Willner injects himself with HIV. When asked why he would put his life on the line to make a point, Dr. Willner replied: "I do this to put a stop to the greatest murderous fraud in medical history. By injecting myself with HIV positive blood, I am proving the point as Dr. Walter Reed did to prove the truth about yellow fever. In this way it is my hope to expose the truth about HIV in the interest of all mankind." He tested negative multiple times.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker demonstrates using a butterfly needle set, typically used for blood draws and injections. He recounts a story of accidentally injecting himself with penicillin while trying to give his infant son a shot. He then wipes the needle in a blood sample, stating it is for the sake of humanity. He addresses Fauci, Gottlieb, Galpin, Gallo, and others, calling them criminals. He says this action is in the hope that it will save millions of lives from what he calls the greatest lie ever told. He acknowledges the action hurts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a heck of a time to lose my needle. There we go. Okay. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a typical butterfly needle set. If somebody has a scissor yeah, I got it.
Okay. It's sterile. And, usually, we use it to take blood by sticking this in, and then we can inject things also. So let's do that. We got this.
Yeah. Okay. Yeah. I gotta let me put my glasses on. Okay?
I think you'd rather I do that. I gotta tell you a cute little story. Shortly after my son was born many years ago, he's now 40, he got some kind of an infection or whatnot, and I spoke to the pediatrician at the hospital, I was an intern at the time, and he said, Go home and give him a shot of penicillin. So I took the syringe and everything home, and my wife held Bruce over her shoulder, and I grabbed his little bottom cheek, and I go like this, and I stuck it right into my thumb, so Careful. You can tell I don't like doing this.
Never have. Okay. Now we and we wanna get a lot of blood. There we go. Okay.
There we go. Now I'm wiping this needle thoroughly in this blood, And I say to my friends, Fauci, Gottlieb, and Galpin, and, Gallo and all the rest of those criminals, alright, that this is for the sake of humanity and no other reason. Oh, wow. Oh, thanks. And believe me, it hurts.
And this is in the hope that it'll save the lives of millions of individuals who will die because of the greatest lie ever told.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Warning: If you choose to get vaccinated, you do so at your own risk, because no one is being held accountable. You've been warned. https://t.co/jwoLIXSaY9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Original Summary:
是我们的一个人的人的，都是不是我们的人的人，都是不是我们的人的人，都是我们的人的人，都是不是那时候的人，都是不是那个。
English Translation:
It is the people of one person of ours, are they not the people of us, are they not the people of us, are they the people of us, are they not the people of that time, are they not that one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 的 是 我 们 的 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 我 们 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 我 们 的 人 的 人 都 是 我 们 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 那 时 候 的 人 都 是 不 是 那 个
@_APWK_ - Luiz
People didn’t die of “covid.” People were murdered by hospital protocols. https://t.co/Phdy9MxSKJ
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw the secret vaccine purchase agreement South Africa signed with Pfizer. It reveals unknown efficacy, adverse events, and long-term effects. It feels like leaders worldwide have treated citizens as lab rats in this whole plandemic, which I believe was a scam.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
BREAKING: The secret vaccine purchase agreement that South Africa signed with @Pfizer has been released. Unknown efficacy Unknown adverse events Unknown long term effects Leaders around the world recklessly turned their citizens into lab-rats by signing this garbage. The whole plandemic was a scam.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Here’s a link to the full agreement between Pfizer and South Africa. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23941524-south-africa-pfizer-contract
South Africa-Pfizer Contract
documentcloud.org
@_APWK_ - Luiz
BREAKING: Now in the peer-reviewed literature: a 37% loss of life expectancy if you got a COVID shot. Will the FDA finally pull the mRNA injections?
@_APWK_ - Luiz
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/7/1343
A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province
Immortal time bias (ITB) is common in cohort studies and distorts the association estimates between the treated and untreated. We used data from an Italian study on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, with a large cohort, long follow-up, and adjustment for confounding factors, affected by ITB, with the aim to verify the real impact of the vaccination campaign by comparing the risk of all-cause death between the vaccinated population and the unvaccinated population. We aligned all subjects on a single index date and considered the “all-cause deaths” outcome to compare the survival distributions of the unvaccinated group versus various vaccination statuses. The all-cause-death hazard ratios in univariate analysis for vaccinated people with 1, 2, and 3/4 doses versus unvaccinated people were 0.88, 1.23, and 1.21, respectively. The multivariate values were 2.40, 1.98, and 0.99. Possible explanations of this trend of the hazard ratios as vaccinations increase could be a harvesting effect; a calendar-time bias, accounting for seasonality and pandemic waves; a case-counting window bias; a healthy-vaccinee bias; or some combination of these factors. With 2 and even with 3/4 doses, the calculated Restricted Mean Survival Time and Restricted Mean Time Lost have shown a small but significant downside for the vaccinated populations.
mdpi.com
@_APWK_ - Luiz
A gallery dedicated to vaccination victims has been put up in Vienna. https://t.co/dTzG7k4MDw
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Vaccines are not tested against placebos because the harms would be too obvious. They are tested against other harmful vaccines. Testing against a placebo would show how harmful and ineffective ALL vaccines are. https://t.co/9RbSaTq8GJ
@_APWK_ - Luiz
How can anyone trust vaccists after watching this? https://t.co/3mMPm7LJM5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video emphasizes the importance of COVID-19 vaccination, including the need for boosters. It discusses the potential need for multiple booster shots in the future. Doctor Hotez is praised for his expertise and efforts to combat misinformation. Monkeypox is highlighted as a growing concern among a specific social network. The importance of vaccination, especially for children, is reiterated throughout the video. The overall message is to prioritize vaccination to combat the spread of COVID-19 and other diseases.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the things that we're not hearing a lot about is the unique potential safety problem of coronavirus vaccines. And then something changed. Any vaccine released by emergency use authorization by the FDA is an outstanding, vaccine.
Speaker 1: J and j's vaccine has a risk of life threatening blood clots.
Speaker 2: When you hear the beep, that's the sound of safety.
Speaker 0: So don't overthink it. They're they're both really good vac they're all really good vaccines. Get vaccinated now.
Speaker 2: I've gotta call now.
Speaker 0: If you wait, it's gonna be really too late to protect your child.
Speaker 2: If this was your child, what happens next could make it the worst day of your life.
Speaker 1: So even though COVID poses zero threat to healthy children
Speaker 0: Vaccinate your children.
Speaker 2: Do the right thing. Be safe and not sorry.
Speaker 0: I'm strongly recommending for adolescents to get their 2 doses of vaccine fully immunized after those 2 doses.
Speaker 2: Advanced technology that can help save lives.
Speaker 0: This is gonna be a long lasting vaccine. A long lasting vaccine. A few moments later. We're seeing that 2 doses is not holding up well for emergency room visits. It's not holding up well for hospitalizations.
Speaker 2: Here we go.
Speaker 0: Again. Everyone's going to need a booster. You need that 3rd immunization. Triple Triple the amount. Get that 3rd immunization.
Get 2 mRNA vaccines. We're always a 3 dose vaccine. The 2 mRNA vaccines were always a 3 dose vaccine. We've I've always said this is a 3 dose vaccine. You've I've always said this is a 3 dose vaccine.
This is a 3 dose vaccine.
Speaker 2: But I'm not done yet.
Speaker 0: That third immunization, The problem is it's not holding up. So we may have to look at sort of innovative solutions. Oh god. Not this again. A 4th immunization Oh, boy.
Just just to keep them to keep them going. Keep the country, going. We have to consider some out of the box things. A 4th immunization 4. A 4th immunization.
Get that second boost. A second boost. Just keep the country, going. I've made that recommendation, a 4th immunization.
Speaker 2: But I'm still not done.
Speaker 0: Unfortunately, the numbers are starting to trend up again, so the hospitalizations are up. And so the most important message that I have this morning is get your new bivalent booster.
Speaker 3: Oh, Willie and Lee's were saying they got their booster, and I was like, oh, I need to get mine. And then I found out they they're talking about the 3rd shot. And is that the bivalent, or is it the 4th booster? Or does it matter?
Speaker 0: Like Don't worry so much about the number of
Speaker 2: There's no wrong way to use it.
Speaker 0: You have to get it. This new bivalent booster
Speaker 2: You can double or triple stack them.
Speaker 0: The new bivalent one is is doing a much better job. You have to get a booster. Yeah. You need to get this new bivalent boost. That bivalent booster for COVID.
Speaker 4: But does everyone ages 12 and older need a booster?
Speaker 0: The answer is yes. Yes. And by the way, if you're over 50 and have gotten 2 boosters and more than 4 2 or 2 to 4 months out, you're gonna need a 3rd booster as well, a 5th immunization. 5. I don't think we're gonna need an annual booster like flu.
Speaker 2: Eventually.
Speaker 1: Doctor Hotez supports yearly boosters just like flu.
Speaker 2: But I'm still not done.
Speaker 0: It looks as though the boosters are not holding up quite as well as we'd like. And and and I think our think thinking is going to change and that what's going to happen is every, you know, few months, we may need another booster. Uh-uh. Uh-uh.
Speaker 2: Perfect Perfect results each and every time.
Speaker 0: You know, we just could not overcome that massive disinformation campaign. These fake concepts of herd immunity and discrediting masks. Doctor Hotez, but you are a national treasure. It is picking off young people like we've never seen. Doctor Peter Hotez, that was extremely informative.
Disinformation that you're hearing, that kids are fine, it's nonsense. Kids need to get that vaccination. You health care workers have been our saviors. Watch out for that misinformation. Doctor Peter Hotez is probably one of the smartest people on this topic.
If you haven't gotten your 5 and ups vaccinated yet, now is the time to do that.
Speaker 3: Doctor Peter Hotez, thank you for saving the world.
Speaker 0: We also support giving that 3rd immunization for the 12 to 17 year olds. People have to feel safe. Doctor Hotez, you are a voice of reason. Take down the fake information. These fake concepts of herd immunity.
Our last hope is to vaccinate our way through this. Make certain that everybody's vaccinated, including their kids. That's the single most important thing right now the American people have to do. Doctor Peter Hotez, you're the person that we like to go to, for the sort of expertise. Single most impactful thing you can do is make certain that you're fully boosted and preferably too boosted.
Later. Buckypox is a global emergency. And it's accelerating among a specific social network of of men who have sex with men, not because it's sexually transmitted.
Speaker 1: Monkeypox is sexually transmitted, almost exclusively.
Speaker 4: Before we let you go, we have to stop and applaud you because I didn't a lot of MSNBC viewers who have watched you constantly for the last 3 years or so and and have come to trust you. I don't
Speaker 5: know if they fully appreciate what you have done.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Perfect example of how most people behaved during the plandemic. He posted by the door with a lint roller and no one questioned a thing 🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️ https://t.co/1leAdP3EIK
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Is polio caused by toxins such as the now banned pesticide DDT or a virus? https://t.co/4FQwLlDAm6
@_APWK_ - Luiz
video credit to @forrestmaready
@_APWK_ - Luiz
🚨BREAKING: X just banned the son of WEF co-founder Hussain Najadi for calling for the arrests of Bill Gates, WHO leadership, the WEF, Klaus Schwab, Big Tech and Pfizer. He says he and his mother are now dying from the vaccine, which he calls “poison”. https://t.co/sNLL7IlnEI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Geneva is a beautiful city with a dark side. The World Health Organization (WHO), Gavi, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) are all based there. The speaker calls for the arrest of these organizations, claiming they promote poison and are responsible for injecting nanolepeds into billions of people. Another speaker criticizes the UN and the immunity given to WHO and Gavi by the Swiss government. They believe this is a global crime scene and are trying to raise awareness. Both speakers emphasize the importance of building a global movement to protect the people. They call for Swiss neutrality to be restored and for the masses to stand up against the injected poison.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Geneva looks beautiful. It's beautiful. It has a lake. It has its shadow. It's very peaceful, but there's a dark side to it.
Everything evil in the world related to Demond Saif, unfortunately, comes from Geneva. You have WHO in Geneva. You have Gavi, then you have the WEF, the World Economic Forum, which my father was a cofounder and left Klaus Schwab out of disgust in the early eighties that has diplomatic immunity. I, as a Swiss citizen, right here now, Declare that the Vef is not eligible anymore for diplomatic immunity. I call on the Swiss authorities and security to arrest those people immediately.
Why? The WEF, WHO, Garvey, Big Pharma, Big Tech, Bill Gates, all advocated a global humanity injection by a bioweapon injecting Nanolepeds into 5,700,000,000 people, and we Swiss are hosting them. That's terrible. We cannot tolerate any entity that promotes poison to be injected into humanity, but you have done it. I'm the victim.
I'm dying from it. And my mother too. It's a demo site, and you'll be judged. It will be corrected in the name of humanity.
Speaker 1: Maybe there is a Geneva Swiss syndrome, but definitely, there is a a UN syndrome because people are so afraid of what's going on because the United Nation is occupied that people in there don't understand. Those who understand keep quiet Or try to speak in different ways to help people to wake up. So if you understand that, you know that this was very easy To carve a world government. If you don't have a force that stops that and says, we the people is more important, And that's what we're doing now. We're trying to build a We The People movement that is very global, something completely different, But what is going on in Geneva is is the opposite at the moment.
There is no right to WHO to give any orders to dictate to the whole world like they And the Global Alliance For Vaccine Immunization, Gavi, got total immunity from The Swiss government, you can find this, admin. Lex in the Swiss database. Go and look. This is a coup d'etat, clearly. It's a global crime scene, and we are bringing little pieces of evidence to people with humility because in science, you always have a doubt.
It's a it's a healthy doubt, and I think that is a very important attitude.
Speaker 0: I believe personally, Geneva has a better future. Swiss neutrality has to be restored. We have no future not being neutral. The young people who survive through this We'll be the guarantors, hopefully, that such institutions can never again take foothold in our blessed country. Never again.
The snakehead is in Geneva. I call it a direct, clear, and present danger to the Swiss population, but I can tell you it is being cut off. If you have a house of cards, and this is a house of cards of a criminal. One card pulled by justice and the whole card house collapses. But from hope alone, it is not done.
Everybody must now change the spirits. And all the vaccinated, the injected knowing that they are poison. We are the masses. We are billions of people. Let's just stand up and say, Stop.
We will not comply. And in French, nie oublis nie pardon because we are the guardians of humanity and our light obliterates The darkness of evil, always.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
What really killed people during the plandemic: Mass intubations killing 90% of people. Remdesevir destroying peoples organs. Lockdowns & Isolation resulting in: Suicides Overdoses Domestic violence Perpetual fear and stress Masks inhibiting natural breathing Zero holistic care
reSee.it AI Summary
Pfizer warns of reactions after Comirnaty COVID vaccine, including breathing issues, myocarditis, and pericarditis. Protection is not guaranteed. COVID cases rise ahead of 2024 election. Bivalent vaccines offer improved defense against symptomatic and severe disease. Severe allergic reactions possible, especially within an hour. Monitor for chest pain, shortness of breath, and heart irregularities. Males aged 12-17 face highest risk of myocarditis. Fainting can occur. Weakened immune systems may have reduced response. Vaccine may not protect all recipients. Stay informed.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
Pfizer posting warnings now on the upcoming Comirnaty batch of COVID Vaccines. Saying after shot you will be required to stay at location for observation of possible reactions. Some of these reactions listed include Not Breathing Myocarditis Pericarditis to name a few... Also they state plainly the vaccine "can" (not will) provide improved protection...what's that mean like a lil better than 0? C'mon this is ridiculous. Don't forget COVID cases are rising just in time for election year 2024 and mail in ballots. Pfizer Press bivalent COVID-19 vaccines provide some protection COVID-19,2,3 evidence suggests that vaccines better matched to currently circulating strains can offer improved protection against symptomatic and severe disease. IMPORTANT SAFETY COMIRNATY could cause a severe allergic reaction. A severe allergic reaction would usually occur within a few minutes to 1 hour after getting a dose of the vaccine. For this reason, your vaccination provider may ask you to stay at the place where you received the vaccine for monitoring after vaccination. Signs of a severe allergic reaction can include: difficulty breathing, swelling of the face and throat, a fast heartbeat, a bad rash all over the body, dizziness and weakness Authorized or approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccines show increased risks of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart), particularly within the first week following vaccination. For COMIRNATY, the observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Seek medical attention right away if you have any of the following symptoms after receiving the vaccine, particularly during the 2 weeks after receiving a dose of the vaccine: chest pain shortness of breath feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart Additional symptoms, particularly in children, may include: Fainting Unusual and persistent fatigue or lack of energy Persistent vomiting Persistent pain in the abdomen Unusual and persistent cool, pale skin Fainting can happen after getting injectable vaccines including COMIRNATY. Your vaccination provider may ask you to sit or lie down for 15 minutes after receiving the vaccine People with weakened immune systems may have a reduced immune response to COMIRNATY COMIRNATY may not protect all vaccine recipients.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
New study shows masks expose the wearer to high levels of toxic volatile chemicals created during the mask's manufacturing process. So, now it’s proven masks provide no benefits, hinders breathing and communication and pose a health risk by increasing volatile toxin exposures.
reSee.it AI Summary
Florida lawmakers plan to classify mRNA Covid vaccines as bioweapons, seeking to ban their administration in the state. The Brevard Republican Executive Committee urges Gov Ron DeSantis to sign the legislation, citing claims of vaccine-related deaths and disabilities. The resolution calls for a ban on vaccine sale and distribution, seizure of remaining doses for safety testing, and mandatory disclosures on mRNA or gene-altering products in the state.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
BREAKING: Florida To Officially Classify mRNA COVID Shots As Illegal ‘Bio-Weapons’ Lawmakers in Florida have announced plans to officially designate mRNA Covid vaccines as “bio-weapons” that are hazardous to human health. The proposed law seeks to BAN the administration of mRNA shots to anybody in the state. The Brevard Republican Executive Committee has urged Gov. Ron DeSantis to sign the legislation, which will outlaw Covid-19 vaccines, as soon as possible. The non-binding resolution was passed by a supermajority vote of committee membership Thursday. It now goes to DeSantis to sign. http://Floridatoday.com reports: A draft version of the resolution reviewed by reporters closely mirrors one passed by the Lee County Republican Party in February, drawing national headlines. “Strong and credible evidence has recently been revealed that Covid-19 and Covid-19 injections are biological and technological weapons,” the Brevard draft resolution says, citing claims that have been disproven and disputed by respected medical groups. “An enormous number of humans have died or been permanently disabled” by the vaccine, it says. “Government agencies, media and tech companies, and other corporations, have committed enormous fraud by claiming Covid-19 injections are safe and effective.” It calls on DeSantis to ban sale and distribution of the vaccine “and all related vaccines,” and for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to seize all remaining doses in the state for safety testing, “on behalf of the preservation of the human race,” it says. It also calls for mandatory disclosures on any product in the state “using mRNA or gene altering or therapeutic technology.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Republican party leaders in Brevard County, Florida are planning to call on state leaders to ban mRNA-based COVID vaccines, claiming they are biological weapons. They believe that government agencies, media, tech companies, and other corporations have committed fraud by promoting the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. The leaders are preparing a letter to be sent to Tallahassee, coinciding with a grand jury investigation into the vaccines. If the ban is approved, no one in Florida would be allowed to receive the vaccines. Meanwhile, the federal government has urged drug companies to make the vaccines more affordable and accessible. The vote on the ban is expected to pass, as there is significant support for it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vaccine turns out it's back in the news.
Speaker 1: Republican party leaders on the Space Coast are minutes away from officially calling on the governor and other state leaders to ban mRNA based COVID vaccines immediately. IT chief investigator Mike Magnolia has more on what exactly is going on. Mike.
Speaker 0: Good Good evening, everybody. Well, in their own words, the leaders of Brevard County's GOP say that they believe the vaccines are a biological weapon. As you say, this is the executive committee of the party in Brevard. They haven't hit send on this letter yet, but that vote coming up 630 and I'm told it's very likely going to pass. If it does, they're asking state leadership to make it illegal to give or to take mRNA vaccines in Florida.
In this 4 page letter, complete with footnotes, Brevard County Republicans cite sources Which led them to a stunning conclusion. Here it is in their own words. Government agencies, media and tech companies, And other corporations have committed enormous fraud by claiming COVID nineteen injections are safe and effective. Strong and credible evidence has recently been revealed that COVID nineteen and COVID nineteen injections are biological and technological weapons. If approved, this letter will be sent to Tallahassee at a time when a grand jury requested by governor DeSantis Is investigating those very same vaccines.
That grand jury's job is to determine whether pharmaceutical giants Who brought the mRNA vaccines to market broke any laws and should face charges. It's already illegal to require anyone to get the COVID vaccine in Florida, but if state leaders go along with Brevard's request, no one in Florida would be allowed to get those vaccines. Today, the federal government sent a very different letter to drug companies calling on them to make the COVID vaccines cheaper and more accessible, Anticipating an increase in demand come flu season. The Brevard County Republicans gathering right now. That vote is expected sometime during the 6 o'clock hour, but I can tell you there is major support for this going forward.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
15,891,821 “covid” sequences submitted. This is what happens when a computer spitting out random codes that aren’t real. This is why the PCR doesn’t test for anything, resulting in 80% of people testing “positive” not even being sick. This also gives them endless fabricated “variants.”
