reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@matttttt187 - {Matt} $XRPatriot
BETTER TAKE A SEAT The Pope's Confession To The People Of The World The real truth about The Vatican & the Jesuit Priests This is heavy stuff, you might just want to start praying on Saturdays instead of Sundays https://t.me/WierdShit
Video Transcript AI Summary
Italian speaker discusses the simplicity and authenticity of the Italian language, emphasizing the importance of unity and brotherhood. They mention the need to overcome separation and sin, and to find common ground as brothers. The speaker urges listeners to pray for them and expresses gratitude for the opportunity to speak from the heart. They ask for prayers to continue their mission and let the Lord work miracles. Another speaker briefly mentions food and the sea.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dopo il più scopo chiesto di costa e specchi di italiani da perché noi italiani noi carcoli è una lingua più semplice e più autentica e questa lingua del cuore ha un linguaggio è una grammatica speciale la grammatica due regole che hanno l'altro perché il tuo fratello delle persone e con questi due costa piano avanti io sono due incontri mio fratello il resto con il fratello lontano siamo amici danni del vostro convegno di vostro lavoro con piacere di un saluto un saluto di rosso e non si sul nostro parquet a metà gioia che voi chiedere uniti per notare gesù cristo dell'unico signore pregare al padre e ricevere lo spirito questo da gioia perché si deve non sta agito perché ma succede come nei quartieri nel quartiere ci sono famiglie che si vogliono le famiglie che non si vogliono famiglie che si si separano e noi siamo un po mi permetto la parola separati separati perché I peccati siano per I nostri peccati I mali interessi nella soglia una lunga strada di peccato comunitario ma chi ha la colpa tutti abbiamo la colpa tutti siamo peccatori soltanto uno è il nostro signore signora non sta via che questa separazione finisca si dia la compagnia di tre labbra in qua per fare la sacra quando imparate di sette affamati sono andati per comprare certo interno andare a comprare avevano I soldi ma non potevano mangiare I soldi hanno trovato qualcosa d'impatto hanno trovato il fratello Tutti noi abbiamo dei soldi, I soldi della cultura, I soldi del territorio, tante ricchezze culturali anche religiose tra tradizione diverse ma dobbiamo trovarci come fratello e dobbiamo piangere insieme quel pianto finisce il pianto dell'amore Io vi parlo come un fratello.
E mi parlo così semplicemente con giorni e nostalgia facciamo crescere la nostalgia perché questo ci spingerà a trovarci abbracciare e a notare Gesù Cristo come un'impossibilità della storia ti ringrazio tanto per lasciarvi parlare la lingua del cuore e vi chiedo anche un favore di pregare per me perché ho bisogno delle vostre preghiere io per I loro tamponi tutto farò ma io ho bisogno del vostro preghiere per pregare a scappare perché ci e avanti siamo fratelli ci diamo spiritualmente questo abbraccio e lasciamo che il Signore finisca l'opera che lui di famiglia perché questo è un miracolo del militare è incominciato e dice uno scrittore italiano che non sono il famoso dice questa plastica un romanzo non ho un uomo semplice nel popolo dice questa parte non ho trovato mai che il signore aveva incominciato il miracolo senza finirlo bene lui fine aveva sognato le tue grida ti chiedo che tra tondo a fratello una francia grazie
Speaker 1: questo vuole manger e ma anche lei con un prendendo in che tace telebera un punto con la patero crema andava come un po male club il
Speaker 0: mare
Weird Shit👽
UFO's, ET's, Ghosts & Paranormal stuff 👽💩 Weird Shit https://t.me/WierdShit
t.me
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
THE VATICAN HAS BEEN DOING SHADY THINGS FOR A LONG TIME!
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a documentary about a little girl who went missing from the Vatican. She was a resident living within the Vatican walls, and her family was one of the few who lived there. The case is about 30 years old, but it has recently been reopened. The documentary is called Vatican Girl, and it explores various conspiracy theories surrounding the girl's disappearance. While there are some clear answers, there are also multiple points where even the investigators are unsure. It's a wild story that you should definitely watch.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Saw that documentary about the little girl that went missing from the Vatican? No. No? No. I don't even know what it's called, Jimmy.
It's a the girl who went missing is what I think my instinct is saying, but, it's about a resident. You know, there's a small amount of residents that live in the Vatican walls, in Vatican City. Her family was one of them. And this has got to be I don't know. 30 years ago, she went missing, and the story is fucking wild.
Yeah. It's called Vatican Girl. I just Googled it 2 days ago. It says they reopened the case, so I don't know. Dude, you have to watch this.
It's bananas. These things happen? Well, there's a bunch of different, conspiracies. There's a bunch of different, like there is kind of a somewhat clear cut answer in it, but there's multiple points where even they go, I don't know. This may this have may come from multiple avenues of this being a very well coordinated thing.
@ReturnOfKappy - Isaac’s Army
The damn Vatican has turned Satanic.... There I said it.... What is the "Pope" doing?.. #WeWantAnswers #Vatican #VaticanNews
@DoctorHens - Doctor Steven Hens 🧑⚕️💉
If you watch any video today, please make it this one so that you can understand just how evil things have become with the NWO and their rituals. The Kek society works incredibly hard to bring this information out so please watch, like and share! @Thekeksociety
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Pope Francis Showing The World Who’s In Charge. This Is Very Telling 👀 https://t.co/mtbRHZehZh
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU BELIEVE THIS MAN ? https://t.co/sVAyDtNvzK
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the dimensional collapse and the appearance of rods, which are large streaks captured on tape that represent 4th and 5th dimensional craft moving through space. The speaker also mentions an increase in ghost sightings as our frequency rises. They caution against trusting someone who claims to be an angel and explain that archangels were actually fleets of craft. The speaker reveals that the sphinx is a distraction and that the real knowledge lies beneath the pyramid. They predict that in the next 10 years, we will learn more about our genetic identity and history through contactees. They also anticipate significant earth changes, including a magnetic pole shift. The speaker shares the significance of feathers in Native American culture, as they are sensitive to magnetic and energy fields and serve as antennas for telepathic communication within tribes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When is the, collapse, the dimensional collapse starting? Is it already starting with the sound and the color? Okay. It's already started. Thank you for leading me here.
What you're gonna start hearing about in the next near in the very near future are something called rods. And they will be something that will be videotaped. And what they will be what you will see are large streaks just shooting through the air that are etheric, but are being able to be captured on tape. And what you're seeing is literally 4th and 5th dimensional craft moving through space, not having the slightest clue that they're flying right through us. Okay?
And that's because you're beginning to see the implosion. It's great stuff. Add ghosts. Yes. You will see more ghosts, more apparitions, because those that are stuck between 3rd 4th density will start being more and more visible as our frequency starts to raise and rise.
A lot of them, unless they are healed, and I do not know how to do that, how to set them free from their self imposed prisons, will be exiting, transitioning. Angels, folks, be very careful about somebody who tells you they're an angel, for example. I've asked about the archangels. And the Andromedan perspective of that is is that the archangel Michael was literally a fleet of craft that were called mikael. That was the name of the fleet.
And they used to patrol the northern hemisphere of the planet when Orion was here in full force. Gabriel was the name of another fleet of craft, and so on and so forth. It has been changed and created into something that will save you and rescue you, when in fact, that was not the original intent stalled. Okay. What's gonna happen in the next 10 years?
I I will share this with you. There are definitely some things underneath the sphinx, but the bulk of the real stuff that will tell us about our ancient history is still underneath the pyramid. And there are there were a there was a vault built 3 levels deep, and the pyramid was built over it. Okay. That's where the real juice is.
That's where the real knowledge is. The sphinx will have some things but it's a distraction. These guys are real good at what they do, at diverting attention from reality, from truth. They're excellent at it. If they put that much energy into telling the truth, God, we'd all be out of here.
Okay. Hold on one sec. I'm just I don't have it somewhere. Okay. Things that are gonna happen in the next 10 years.
Number 1, we're going to truly find out who we are genetically. Information will be coming from all corners of the earth from contactees. There will be more and more contacts, and they will tell us about the 22 different races and more of our history. There will also be massive earth changes. They will start with a magnetic pole shift, which could happen any time between now and the year 2001.
Things have been sped up. We're already starting to see the magnetic magnetic poles shift as we see birds migrate in the wrong direction at the wrong times of year. The birds move along the earth's magnetic grid lines. And I wanted to share something with you. I'm very fascinated with the Native Americans.
And I love to collect feathers when I find them on my journeys and my vision quests. And I was given this on 3/19 of 'ninety four, and I just want to share this with you. It's primarily about the Native Americans and the original intent behind them wearing the feather. In the ancient way, your native red American races understood the nature of the birds. They the the birds are very sensitive to magnetic fields and microwave energy, as you call it.
They will migrate along the Earth energy grids. And their wings, which are made up primarily of feathers, were to be watched as they were very sensitive. To watch and follow the birds is to know which way the Earth's magnetic flows are moving. They would also the Native American races camp off these magnetic flows because the radiation would become harmful in time. The feathers are very sensitive to energy fields and magnetic fields.
They are in fact an antenna. The feather would attract telepathic communication with all the tribe. As the chief would think or quietly discuss plans, the rest of the tribe within the ancient days received the message with few or no words.
@LaineyWasi - Elaine Wasi🍊
👀 WHOA 👀 In a recent video Archbishop Vigano drops some heavy truth bombs💣💦 https://t.co/2k1vJBXSeL
Video Transcript AI Summary
John Podesta, a collaborator of Hillary Clinton, was recently arrested for pedophilia and child pornography. Slade Sommer, a Broadway and cinema figure, played a role in debunking the Pizzagate affair. It is believed that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were members of the Israeli Mossad, using trips to Epstein Island to blackmail influential individuals involved in crimes against minors. Western leaders remain silent on civilian massacres in Gaza, possibly due to Israeli intelligence videos. Similar tactics were used to create a fake pandemic emergency and manipulate the Ukrainian crisis. These events are part of a globalist subversive project.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A few weeks ago, an important collaborator of Hillary Clinton in John Podesta was arrested for pedophilia and child pornography. I'm referring to Slade Sommer, a man with ties to the world of Broadway and cinema who play a role in the effort to debunk the infamous Pizzagate affair. That is the network filthy complexity and horrendous crimes against minors that revolves around the international deep state. We have learned that certainly Jeffrey Epstein and most likely Ghislaine Maxwell were members of the Israeli Mossad. This make us understand that the famous trips of many well known people to Epstein Island were used to blackmail them by collecting evidence of their guilt in participating in heinous crimes against minor.
And even the heads of state and governance officials of the Western world do not dare to breathe out a word of protest against the massacres of civilians in Gaza Strip. It is legitimate to assume that this attitude is due is due to the intense those videos inculcating them that are in possession of the Israeli intelligence services. The same thing must be happened with the preparation of the fake pandemic emergency which was lavishly replicated in all the member states of the World Economic Forum and the United Nations and also with the fast of the Ukrainian crisis. But this plasmid of the powerful of the world constitute the unified element of the globalist subversive project.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU BELIEVE THE VATICAN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS YOUNG GIRL? https://t.co/LNxtvgSRtr
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1983, 15-year-old Emanuela Orlandi disappeared from Vatican City, sparking conspiracy theories involving the Italian mafia, Vatican Satanists, and human trafficking. Recently, her family received a mysterious note about a Vatican tomb, leading them to uncover two empty graves in a cemetery. Emanuela's disappearance has been linked to other church scandals and her brother accused Vatican officials of lacking transparency. Despite false leads and red herrings, her family continues to search for answers. The Vatican suggested that the bones in the crypts may have been moved during construction. Emanuela's family remains hopeful for her return.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The mysterious disappearance of Emanuela Orlando Orlandi in the Vatican. In June of 1983, 15 year old Emanuela Orlandi disappeared from Vatican City after attending a music lesson. Orlandi's disappearance launched decades of conspiracy theories that include the Italian mafia, Vatican Satanists, trafficking and sacrifice. On the last day, anyone saw her. Orlandi called her sister after her music class to tell her that a representative from Avon Cosmetics had offered her a job.
When Orlandi failed to return home the following day, her parents called the police. Over the next few weeks, many witness reports called in, but none of the information lead towards any discoveries. It has since been suggested that the Rome based crime syndicate, Vanda Della Magliana, after kidnapped Orlandi to force the Vatican to pay them back for an outstanding loan. The girlfriend of the leader of that criminal organization, Enrico De Pates, later claimed that told her that Orlandi was indeed kidnapped and killed. The most hair raising theories, however, claimed that the Vatican, after local police and high profile lawmakers kidnapped Orlandi and forced her into sexual servitude.
At least this is what the Vatican's chief exorcist father Gabriele Amorth believes. The fate of Orlandi still remains a mystery to this day. After
Speaker 1: 36 years after a teenage vanished, her family received a cryptic note about a Vatican tomb. A mysterious message referring to a Vatican grave was delivered to the family of Emanuela Orlando Orlandi, a teenage girl who disappeared 36 years prior. This promising lead was the first in nearly 40 years, which gave the family hope for answers. The hint directed them to look in the direction that the angel is pointing. Two ancient graves were uncovered after the detectives were directed to a cemetery in Vatican City by this tip.
However, this finding had an unexpected result. Emanuela was born in nineteen sixty eight and raised inside the boundaries of the Vatican City. Her absence, however, destroyed the sense of security for her family. One of the most puzzling mysteries in contemporary Holy See history is Emanuela, who was the daughter of a lay employee of the Vatican. Emanuela vanished without a trace on June 22, 1983 after attending an instrument class in Rome.
She was supposed to return home, but she never did. Since 1983, the authorities have been perplexed by the intriguing case, apps, which has been made more perplexing by reported sightings and conspiracy theories. Several other church scandals a including those involving the Rome's dark underworld and pope John Paul the second's attempted assassination have been linked to her disappearance. Due to this, there have been many false leads and red herrings which has complicated the case for the investigators. After When Emanuela's brother accused Vatican officials of lacking transparency and cooperation in the inquiry in 2019, The matter took a frightening new turn.
He thought the Vatican knew something about what happened to his sister. Emmanuela had been late on the day that the team vanished. She reportedly requested her brother Pietro to go with her, But he declined. Unfortunately, a decision that would stay with him for a long time. The last confirmed sighting of her was at a bus stop in after Rome.
After that, the teenager seemingly vanished off the face of the Earth. Then in the days that followed Emanuela's disappearance, other reports of the youngster were reportedly made. Meanwhile, a few days after Emanuela vanished, One of the 1st conspiracies emerged. Her parents claim that an anonymous person got in touch with them and offered to give them their daughter back. Mehmet Ali Aja, who was behind bars at the time for attempting to slaughter Pope John Paul II in 1981, had to be freed.
But once more, this lead proved to be worthless. However, when he subsequently revealed to Italian television writer that Emanuele was still alive, after the story grew more complex. Strangely, the assassin claimed to know the whereabouts of the missing youngster and said that she was safe and residing in a convent. A creepier story about what had happened to Emanuela gained popularity in 2005. The young teen was allegedly kidnapped at Carden Lugo Poleti's request according to a tip that was apparently sent to an investigator by an unidentified person.
Maria, Emmanuela's mother, still resides in the holy city today, But Pietro has become suspicious of the Vatican and claims that its employees were not open and honest about the inquiry. Pietro was frustrated by the fact that the Vatican never cooperated with the investigators or with our relatives. Aft. They have always disputed any potential obligations within the Vatican and said that nothing was hidden while giving everything they had. Aft.
After seeing Pope Francis in 2013, Pietro reportedly began to believe that the Vatican is aware of Emanuela's abduction. He clarified that Francis had told him that Emanuela was in heaven. It froze Pietro's blood to hear a pope say that. Pietro claims that he made repeated attempts to get in touch with the holy figurehead in order to learn more, but to no effect. After The Vatican was once again mentioned in 2018.
The Orlando family got a tip-off in the form of a picture of a religious statue and a note with it. Aft. The enigmatic message finally directed the hunt for Emanuela to 2 tombs inside a tiny cemetery inside Vatican City after the clue urged to look where the angel is pointing. The Teutonic cemetery is the name of the location, which lies adjacent to Saint Peter's Basilica. The graveyard is the ultimate resting place for German speaking Catholics.
Although despite its prominent location and a Swiss guard is said to keep watch over its elaborate gates. The tip-off then required the Orlando family to obtain authorization from the in order to view the graves described. They had little optimism, particularly in light of reports that Pietro had attempted to talk with pope Francis, after had been rejected. But after close to a year of campaigning by Emmanuela's family, the Vatican finally agreed to exhume the tombs. Aft.
However, the hunt began in July 2019. Any remains found during the hunt would be subjected to DNA testing, the findings of which reportedly take weeks to come in. Pietro believed that the exhumation signaled a change in the Vatican's attitude. The Teutonic cemetery tombs were actually found to be totally vacant. Strangely, none of the 2 princesses who were said to be buried there had any relics in the crypts.
Apps. Surprisingly, the remains of German nobility Princess Charlotte Frederico of Mecklenburg and Princess Sophie von Hohenlohe were never discovered. Aft However, search workers did find 2 vaults, which are tiny rooms used for internment. However, the tale did not finish there. After The graves of the 2 princesses were discovered to be empty, proving that the vaults did, in fact, hold human remains.
Aft. The Vatican has hypothesized that the bones in the crypts could have been moved during construction work in the 19 sixties and 19 seventies. Emmanuela's family is still in a precarious situation despite how the mystery surrounding the bones may seem. They don't seem any closer to learning what happened to their loved one after all. Pietro, though, continues to hold out hope that Emanuela will someday be discovered alive.
He is still anticipating his sister's return.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU BELIEVE THIS? https://t.co/kxXAhSYylG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fascia, comprising 60% of the body, is made up of fluid-filled microtubules that carry energy known as photons. These photons, or points of light, make up the entire body and hold consciousness. While most fascia resembles cloth or spider webs, there are seven locations in the body where it appears as belts or bands. These concentrated bands of energy align perfectly with the chakras, which are the body's energy centers. The crown chakra, often depicted as a 1,000-petaled lotus on the top of the head, is actually an opening into the body called the anterior fontanelle. In summary, chakras are bands of fascial tissue that carry energy in the body.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys, this is fascia. Fascia is 60% of your body. They are little microtubules that are fluid filled, and they carry your energy. And the energy in your body is known as Photons or little points of light. Your entire body is made of them, and they hold your consciousness or are known as communicators.
Now, most fascia in your body looks like cloth or spider webs, but there are 7 locations in the body where they are actually looking like belts or bands of fascia. This picture right here is directly out of the myofascial And it's very cool because these then, since they carry your energy, are concentrated bands of energy. Here is where your chakras are located in your body. Isn't it interesting that those concentrated energy centers called Chakras align perfectly with the bands of concentrated energy called fascia. Oh.
And the top of your head where your crown chakra is located, do you ever wonder why they often show it as a 1,000 petaled lotus on the top of your head? That's because it's not technically a chakra. It's actually an opening into the body. It's your anterior fontanelle, the soft spot you had when you were a baby. In summary, what is the chakra?
It is a band of fascial tissue located in the body that carries your energy.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WHY WOULD T H E P O P E DO THIS? https://t.co/TJ2zEPts7r
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pope Francis, the head of the Jesuit order, made a significant announcement through his cantor. The cantor referred to Lucifer as God and claimed that Lucifer is the father of Jesus Christ. The cantor also acknowledged Lucifer as the antichrist and worshiped him. This proclamation was accompanied by a grand ceremony witnessed by a large crowd and the whole world. The pope wanted this event to be seen globally, as it marked the arrival of the son of perdition.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With great pomp, fanfare, and ceremony, Pope Francis, the head of the Jesuit order, announced through his canter the imminent emergence, the near advent of the coming to light of the anti During this pronouncement, the cantor called Lucifer God, claiming Lucifer to be the father of Jesus Christ. The cantor acknowledged Lucifer as the antichrist himself and worshiped him. To this, a great crowd and the whole world sang. This was the 3 d ceremony that the pope wanted to be seen worldwide. The announcement to the world, the son of perdition, this way comes.
@EccentricVerse - Eccentric Verse
This world is controlled by a dark satanic cult. https://t.co/pxWEhHoayU
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are wicked people in the US government and spiritual warfare happening in high places. Many new world order clubs use an upside-down 5-pointed star as their symbol, which represents the goat's head. Washington DC was laid out in this pattern, with the White House at the bottom of the star. The $1 bill features the all-seeing eye and a pyramid, symbolizing the unfinished goal of a new world order. The date on the pyramid, 1776, is when the Illuminati was founded. The Illuminati, a group aiming for a one-world government, has resurfaced multiple times. In 1933, the 1st humanist manifesto was signed, with John Dewey, a key figure in the American educational system, promoting socialism and the New World Order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But there are some wicked vile people in our government also and always have been. And there's there's spiritual warfare in high places, including in in the US government. Bible says in Matthew chapter 25, he shall shepherd divideth the sheep from the goats. Set the sheep on the right hand, put the goats on the left. Many of these new world order type clubs have the upside down 5 pointed star as their symbol.
Very interesting. That's the symbol, the satanic symbol, representing the goat's head. The 2 horns, the ears and the mouth coming down, the 5 pointed star upside down. Satan worshipers all across America use this symbol freely and lots of their things have the upside down 5 pointed star. Very interesting to note that Washington DC was laid out this way.
Here's one of the original maps of Washington DC. Notice the upside down five pointed did you ever wonder why the streets go so crazy in Washington DC? Why not just right angles like every other town, you know? Why does Pennsylvania Avenue go at such a weird angle? Well, it just so happens at the very bottom of the upside down five pointed star is the White House.
They've got loads of these things, these secret things going on that the average person's never gonna catch. 1933, vice president Harry Wallace, who was an occultist, worshiped into the occult, decided to put the great seal on the $1 bill. Here's a picture of the great seal, the all seeing eye, and I take a lot of flak for this. People have argued for centuries, or for for decades, what this symbol represents. Let me tell you one of the theories.
All right? The eye on top represents Lucifer, the all seeing eye. There's a gap between the eye and the pyramid, symbolizing their job of accomplishing a new world order is not quite done yet. Lucifer has not yet been installed as the chief cornerstone. Now see, Jesus Christ is actually going to be the chief cornerstone, but Lucifer wants to, you know, he wants that job.
There are 13 rows of stones. Very interesting. There were 13 degrees in the blue lodges of the masonic lodge. Behind the, pyramid, on the dollar bill, you will notice there's nothing, desert. In front of the pyramid, you got things growing, some bushes and grass and things like that.
This symbolizes that they think they will bring the world out of this desert, know, terrible times into a wonderful, you know, lush Garden of Eden type of thing. On the bottom is a date in roman numerals. Anybody know that date on there? Bottom of the $1 of the pyramid, 17/76, in roman numerals. 17/76 Here's of course a famous state in America, but it's also the date the Illuminati was started.
A guy named Adam Weishaupt started a group called the Illuminati, the enlightened ones. That'd be a good quiz question there, Becky. Adam Lysop started a group called the Illuminati. They had secret meetings to decide how to control the world. Their group was exposed, and they went underground.
It has resurfaced numerous times, and this of course, the the individual players die off, but the the the cause Continues. And they still have their plans for a heat, one world government, new order. 1933, the 1st humanist manifesto was signed. One of the signers of this was a guy named John Dewey. John Dewey is the father of our educational system here in America.
John Dewey, I was in Vermont at a teacher's college. He was a humanist. He wanted, he claimed to be an atheist, And he said, I'm gonna take over the teacher's college, worked his way to became the top, and then he influenced all the People coming through that teacher's college, which later went out and became presidents of other teacher's colleges, and John Dewey had just an incredible impact on our educational system, leading it toward Socialism, communism, New World Order type stuff, which is where we are now.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE VATICAN IS HIDING? https://t.co/jUH1HwZm8r
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the historical influence of the Jesuits and the Vatican, highlighting their alleged involvement in various events and conspiracies. It mentions their opposition to Protestantism, their efforts to suppress popular governments, and their plan for world domination. The video suggests that the deaths of certain American presidents were suspicious and links them to the Jesuits. It also claims that the Vatican supported dictators and financed Hitler's rise to power. Additionally, the sinking of the Titanic is presented as a deliberate act to eliminate opponents of a central bank. The video concludes by suggesting that the ultimate goal of the Vatican is to establish a one-world government. It advises Christians to pray, study the Bible, seek reformation, separate from evil, and be aware of deceivers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In June of 18/64 the war between the states was entering its final year, and one of the main thoughts that occupied President Abraham Lincoln's mind was the part played by Rome in the war. Lincoln said repeatedly, this war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits, we owe it to potpourri that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her noblest sons. This seems to be a strange statement by president Lincoln considering what is taught today about the war between the states. Nothing is ever mentioned of a religious element in the war or that the pope and the Jesuit order were intimately involved. But Lincoln was not the only voice raised in opposition to the Pope's meddling in the affairs of this country at that time.
Samuel Morse, the inventor of Morse code, traveled to Europe and Rome in 18/30 to do his own investigation into the conspiracies hatched against America. After returning home to the United States, Morse wrote 2 books warning Americans of the threat from Rome, Morse would continue sounding the alarm throughout the 1800 Anne went to discuss the situation with Lincoln after his inauguration.
Speaker 1: Samuel Morse, of course, is the inventor of Morse code It was used for many, many years. And Samuel Morse wrote a book called Foreign Conspiracies Against the Liberties of the United States, it was published in 18/35, and he shows in that book that the Holy Alliance, the Leupold Foundation out of Austria, controlled by the Jesuits, And the Jesuits themselves were the agents to overthrow the liberties of the United States, the Federal Republic of the United States, And to replace it with a papal centralized government as the Vatican is run.
Speaker 0: But today, one looks around us to see US presidents and congressmen and women groveling before the pope. Lincoln's words would seem ironic. Consider this also. In April 2008, the president of the United States, George w Bush, rushed out to meet the pope at his plane. Does this not seem to be odd behavior?
For the first time in history, a US president went out to meet a religious leader or for that matter, any leader upon his entry into the US.
Speaker 2: No president in the entire history of the United States has ever greeted a foreign diplomat like that, ever. They wait until they're brought into Washington or something. They don't go out on the tarmac. This is a first.
Speaker 0: What makes this even more egregious is that the current pope is a former head of the office of inquisition, and a former member of the Nazi party in his youth.
Speaker 3: You know that Cardinal Ratzinger was the grand inquisitor of the Vatican before he became pope Benedict. You're aware of that. I assume other people are not aware of that. For a Jew, the inquisition has such awful, Awful memories and we are inviting the head of the inquisition to the Jewish states. I gave a lecture yesterday and these are the points that I brought up.
You don't Invite the grand inquisitor to Israel. It's that simple.
Speaker 0: How did we go from a nation on the alert against the pope and the Jesuits' desire to bring America down to one of accepting them as friends. Simply put, we have sold out. It is not gone unnoticed that several Protestant presidents have attended mass and taken communion at Catholic churches. Since one cannot take communion at a Roman Catholic service if one is not Catholic, several presidents have misled their supporters into thinking they are Protestant when they are not. Furthermore, those in power are often Roman Catholics outright, so it is expected that they will obey orders from the pope.
From US presidents to kings and queens, to religious leaders throughout the world, those in power meet the pope and bow down to him. Even when President Obama went to the Vatican in July 2009 to discuss the world economic situation, he too bowed to the pope. Upon leaving, President Obama said, we look forward to a very strong relationship between our 2 countries. It is important to remember these words of president Obama and what they mean. The pope is not just a spiritual ruler, is a territorial ruler.
The name of his country since 1929 is Vatican City.
Speaker 4: The Pope Is a monarchy. Actually, according to various books, the Pope is the monarch of the world. Not just a religious leader, he is actually a political leader. The Vatican is actually a small area over in Rome Whereby the Pope is the ruler of that small area. The actual name, Vatican, I found very interesting.
It actually means, Worship of the divine serpent. So we find that the The very basis of the Vatican, the very word itself means the worship of serpents.
Speaker 0: But from Rome's perspective, the Pope rules over more than Vatican City. He rules over the earth both spiritually and materially, or temporally. According to the Roman Catholic teaching, the pope can keep you out of heaven, and he has absolute authority over you on Earth.
Speaker 1: And when I speak of the pope, I speak of the papacy that the papacy claims its 2 powers. Its first power is universal spiritual power over all individuals That every person must be subject to the spiritual power of the pope, that there is no salvation outside of the Catholic church, which is The doctrine of the council of Trent is reaffirmed in the documents of Vatican 2 of the 19 sixties. It's still on the books of canon law. And the other power of the pope which is the 2nd key, as you see the 2 keys, in the pope's flag With the triple crown, lord of heaven, lord of earth, lord of hell, and the 2 keys spiritual power, the 2nd key is the temple power. The temple power is this, That the pope believes he has the right to rule the government, the civil government of every nation.
That temporal power has never been denied. It's never been disclaimed.
Speaker 4: But there is no question that the pope wields both swords, Both a spiritual sword that the public sees, as well as a political sword which most people do not see.
Speaker 0: So it is very interesting and unsettling to those who love freedom and the right to worship God as one sees fit to see our leaders submitting to the Pope of Rome. Now, let us revisit Lincoln's words. We have discussed the Pope's and the papacy, but what about the other group Lincoln mentioned? He spoke of the sinister influence of the Jesuits. Who are the Jesuits?
Speaker 4: Jesuits are a group of people just Loyola. They basically had two purposes. One purpose was to destroy the Protestant Reformation Because as you remember, Martin Luther had appeared at the Diet of Worms in 15/21, stood before Charles the 5th And the Holy Roman Empire. And so the Catholic church sought to stop the Protestant Reformation that Luther began, And they couldn't do it. And so about 20 years after Luther stood at the Diet of Worms, the Jesuit Order was created, And one of their purposes was to destroy every vestige of the Protestant Reformation, Both in the religious realm, in the political realm, and in the economic realm because the Protestant Reformation not only affected The religious arena, it also affected the political and the economic arenas as well.
That was one goal of the Jesuit Order. The other aspect was to restore the supremacy and dominance of the pope Throughout the world. The
Speaker 0: Jesuit order has directed popes concerning policy both foreign and domestic since 15/40, in particular, since the Council of Trent.
Speaker 4: The Council of Trent indeed, it was a it started in fifteen '45, it went for the next 18 years. That doesn't mean that they stayed there for 18 years. They met in different places. But Over that period of time, the various leaders of the Catholic Church and the newly formed Jesuit Order would come together from time to time and discuss how the Catholic Church would respond To the teachings of the Protestant Reformation, would they accept them, or would they completely reject them?
Speaker 1: So the doctrines that were being championed at the reformations, the doctrines of grace, justification by grace through faith, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura, only the scriptures, by grace alone through faith alone, etcetera, etcetera. No baptismal regeneration, that There is only salvation in Christ. We do not participate in our salvation. It's not a joint effort of man and god, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. All the doctrines championed by the reformers We're absolutely accursed and condemned and reprobated by the council of Trent that the Jesuits really oversaw from 15/45 15/63.
It was an 18 year council in the town of Trent, Italy, and that is the foundation of what we call the Counter Reformation.
Speaker 4: And the Council of Trent laid out the the focal point, the direction that the Catholic church would go For the next 4 centuries, basically, at the Council of Trent, they decided that tradition And what the church fathers of the Catholic church taught would continue to be the sole authority in the Catholic church. Now, of course, there's other aspects of that, other teachings that Branch off from that. But that is the basic sum of the Council of Trent, that tradition would still rule the Catholic church. The anathemas that they have come out with, that came from the Council of Trent, to Destroy heretics, to destroy those who would uphold the word of God, those still live today.
Speaker 1: That's correct. The papacy has not rescinded any of the curses set forth in the council of Trent. In fact, the council of Trenton ends and says, accursed be all heretics. Accursed. Accursed.
Every poll passed to swear to uphold the council of Trent. And if you read the documents of Vatican 2, put together by Abbott, It shows you right there that every pope must swear to uphold the Council of Trent. Even though in the sixties when they were calling heritage separated brethren, With that delusion and illusion, they still did uphold the council of Trent as well as all the former papal bulls Condemning heretics and calling for kings to kill them out of their dominions like the diadocles of Pius the 4th.
Speaker 0: The head of the Jesuits is the superior general of the order. He is called the black pope.
Speaker 4: The head of the Jesuit order is the black pope. The man who is currently there, he was just recently elected Nicholas Adolphus. The black pope is the head of the Jesuit order. He is called the black pope not because he is of African origin, But because he is in the dark, we see the white pope. We see pope Benedict the 16th because He's visible and all the world knows who he is.
But the black pope remains in the dark behind the scenes, And so few people know he even exists. But that's why he's called the black pope, and he's the one Who heads the Jesuit order?
Speaker 0: There is an ongoing war against anyone who resists the power of the pope. And this war is directed by the Jesuits. This war is not waged openly by the Jesuits. The society of Jesus moves in the shadows. They infiltrate and get others to do the dirty work of assassination.
If armed conflict is needed, they used the army of 1 nation to bring a disobedient nation to its knees.
Speaker 4: The Jesuits would do that very thing. They were very intelligent. They're still very intelligent people. What they would do is they would infiltrate. They did it through economics, Through the merchants, they would then come in, start teaching.
They're they were very wise people. They would then infiltrate not only into schools, but they then would infiltrate into local government And then rise up to higher government officials. We find that repeatedly in the book by Avril Manhattan called, Vietnam, Why Did we go, where he talks about how they followed this exact plan throughout Southeast Asia. They did it in Japan. They did it in China.
They did it in Korea. They did it in Vietnam. They did it all along the Pacific Rim. Well, eventually, what would happen, you would have created Catholic cities where all the people in towns would become Catholics. Well, they would then try to put their Catholic ideals onto the major religious populace of a country.
In the Far East, of course, the major religious populous would be the Buddhists. So these Catholics in this country, these converts to Catholicism, they would try to push their Catholicism on their Buddhist friends. And when the Buddhist friends rejected it, the Catholics would start to use force. Well, then the Buddhists would appeal to the local governments, the state governments, the national governments, And then there would be revolution. It got so bad in Japan that in 16/39, the the Japanese emperor, He said, No more Catholics, no more Europeans will come to our island Again.
And that band stayed there for almost 2 centuries. This happened throughout the Far East and in other countries throughout the world.
Speaker 0: Why has this assault on the non Catholic world been ignored by most people, especially protestant ministers.
Speaker 4: Billy Graham is not he didn't protest door towards the latter part of his life. For the first part, I think he was solid when he first started. But along around the early sixties, his voice was silenced. Robert Schuller, Paul Crouch, Hal Lindsey, Pat Robertson, James Dobson, all of these men, they're not protesting. What they have become is are agents, Agents of Rome.
I remember back when I was starting my student teaching, I was teaching 7th grade history to young people talking about the pilgrims and puritans coming over to America. The book said absolutely nothing about why they were coming to America. And I was just reading, and I've got a book here called the, Rothchild money trust, and also a book about out the Rockefellers, the Rockefeller File by Gary Allen. But these people have set up trusts, And they have rewritten the history books. They have rewritten the history books, so that, the 7th grade history book that I was teaching out of said nothing about the reformations.
Speaker 1: We have to remember that The papacy, specifically the black pope, controls all high level freemasonry. That includes Clues the Pope's Masonic Jewish Zionist running his kingdom of Jerusalem. That includes the top freemasons in this country. The especially the temple there in Washington DC. That includes all of your, big evangelists.
For example, Billy Graham is the 33rd degree freemason. And I know that Billy Graham Organization denies that, but it's still the truth because we know according to the honest 33rd degree freemason who was truly converted to Christ, we believe the gospel, we say about the grace of god, his name was Jim Shaw. That when he was inducted into the order of the 33rd degree in Washington DC, he said there were 2, former presidents there on that, in that council. And, one of them was Gerald Ford, a 33rd degree freemason in pardon Nixon, And the other was Jimmy Carter, 33rd degree Freemason. So there they are at the grand council.
Another one was an international evangelist, Which he later said, told, others that it was Billy Graham because the publisher refused to put Billy Graham's name in there. So Billy Graham was there. So Billy Graham is nothing more than the high level masonic shield for the papacy, which is also a fraud with Freemasons if you read the book In God's Name by By David Yalop. And so we talk about Robert Schuller, for example. Robert Schuller is another 33rd degree freemason.
He went to Rome to get the pope's blessing to build his crystal cathedral. And Robert Schuller is a personal friend of that of the anti white, hateful racist, Louis Farrakhan, Who is another high level freemason who runs the nation of Islam for the archbishop of Chicago. So we have all these high High level masonic leaders, black and white, of all these various different religions working together for agitation among the peoples of this country, but never ever exposing the papacy See, it's the true heart and soul, and they're it's real master.
Speaker 0: All of this sounds incredible. It becomes less so when one examines the oath of the Jesuits.
Speaker 1: We have to understand that these men have died to their own self will. It's something a Christian should do. It's the way we should be. We have no life anymore. Our life is, we're dead with Christ and we're hidden god with him.
When Christ is revealed, who is our life, then we shall be revealed within the glory. We need to learn to die to ourselves, encounter lives as nothing. But our only purpose is to do the will of our master. And when he's finished with that with us, then let us die. The Jesuits have done this, but they do it for the devil.
And so they have completely been emptied of their own personalities, and upon the order of their commander will do exactly what they're told. There's no such thing as a disobedient judgment. They're all under orders. They've been trained for 15 years. They're soldiers.
They're more of a marine corps than the marines. The marines were fashioned after the Jesuit order. You break the man down in boot camp, you rob him of his personality, you shave his head, you put all the same clothes on them. They're all treated the same. They're treated like dirt.
We're gonna rob you of your will so that we can mold you into what we want you. That's all Jesuit. So, this is how they think. In a given order, they will kill you, me, themselves, their mother, Anything they're ordered to do, that is what they will do. We're gonna bring down 911 today, gentlemen.
Okay. Give me the order, what we do, what button we push. Do I to be inside, outside. What is it? And that's what they do.
We need to bring down the Pentagon today. We need to blow up the Arizona In in Pearl Harbor, 1941. Okay. I'll be there. Where's my orders?
They're all under orders. And this is why you can have no country With a Jesuit presence in it, they have to be expelled, and all their agents that they work through must be expelled. And this is exactly what Tsar Alexander the first did in 18/20. He kicked out all the Jesuits out of Russia. In 18/22, he shut down all the masonic lodges.
In 18/25, it was poisoned. So this is the Jesuit mindset, and we have to we should read the spiritual exercises. We should read of their works. We need to read the Jesuit doctrines of the regicide, how it's no murder to kill a heretic, how it's okay to lie, cheat, and steal, how it's okay to kill your enemy, Oh, it's okay to kill a woman that you commit adultery with if she should wanna tell her. I mean, you can kill her.
It's all right there in the canon law. It's okay to steal. The whole world is their candy shop where they can steal everything they could get their hands on to consolidate it Under the power of the Jesuit order, if that means killing kings or sinking ships, even if it causes their own death, they do it for the greater glory of god. A majority of the
Speaker 0: glory. When a Jesuit priest is elevated to a position of high command, he has administered what is called the Jesuit extreme oath of induction. This oath has been called the 4th vow or the blood oath given to those in the society of Jesus besides the traditional vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience. A copy of the extreme oath can be found in the congressional record.
Speaker 4: I wanna read a statement to you, which is the Jesuit oath. It says, This is the Jesuit Oath. I do further promise and declare that I will have no opinion or will of my own that's from the Spiritual Exercises of Loyola Or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver, but will unhesitatingly obey each every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope. I furthermore promise and declare that I will Make and wage relentless war as I am directed to do to extirpate and exterminate Protestants and liberals from the face of the whole earth, I will neither spare aids, sex, or condition. I will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these infamous heretics, Rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants heads against the wall in order to annihilate forever Their Execruple Race.
And then it goes on. The point being, Throughout the history of the Jesuit order, they will shoot, they will burn, they Will play. They will do whatever it takes to destroy anybody who stands in the way of what they want To do.
Speaker 0: In 2009, the Jesuit general was confronted about the oath.
Speaker 5: One of the things in your In your Jesuit high oath, I think it is it says something about furthermore, you promised to declare that we'll, at the first opportunity, at any opportunity against heretics, Protestants, liberals.
Speaker 6: What is that?
Speaker 5: See here? And that that, Will spare neither age nor sex nor condition. And I will hang, waste, boil, flayze. You've never seen this before?
Speaker 6: No. I haven't seen it.
Speaker 5: Strangled, very alive, and it's horrible.
Speaker 0: And I
Speaker 5: was like, look, let me get Even in the congressional record.
Speaker 3: Thank you very much. Thank you for coming.
Speaker 0: Does the oath and activities of the Jesuit reflect anything Christian? Or is it as Jesus said, beware of false prophets which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly, they are ravening wolves. What else do we know about the Jesuits? They've been thrown out of 83 countries over the last 500 years. That is correct.
83 countries have physically removed them. And why was it necessary to remove them? In a word, power. The Jesuits have throughout history sought to take over and control every country in which they reside. Since their beginning in 15/40, the Jesuits power grew until they controlled the papacy, the Roman Catholic church, and many of the governments of the world, in 17/73, all of that changed.
1 by 1, countries began to expel the Jesuits from their borders. This culminated in the suppression or abolishment of the Jesuits in 17/73. In that year, Pope Clement the 14th officially disbanded the order forever. This providential act enabled a nation based on religious liberty to be formed, the United States of America. At the same time in history as the Jesuits were were suppressed, the American Revolution occurred.
Many believe this was no accident, but an act of God.
Speaker 1: I see the suppression of the Jesuits as providential because without the suppression of the Jesuit order, there is no successful American Revolution, period. We have to understand that the Protestants and the Baptists of Europe had been persecuted In excess of 200 years, crying out to the lord for some place to live where they could worship him and seek his face and be obedient to his word. But nothing else was more important to them than that. And so as a result, the lord answered their prayers and opened up North America to them, in the 1600, but ultimately to get a government that would protect them in their rights, Freedom of worship, freedom of press, freedom of conscience, freedom of self defense, and what came to be the American Bill of Rights and then, of course, the US constitution. So Without the suppression of the Jesuit order, there is no, escape for us out of Europe Into North America to start a free nation where we can worship god according to the dictates of our conscience.
Speaker 4: As the Americans were determining And it's setting up a constitution where Protestant principles would reign, where freedom of religion would reign, Where people would have the right to bear arms, where people would have a right to a fair trial, where all of these principles are being laid down, The Jesuit order is abolished. If the Jesuit order had not been abolished in 17/73, And as they watched a Protestant country rising up in the Western Hemisphere, The Jesuit order would have used not only England, who they did use in the American Revolution, They would have used France. They would have used Spain. They would have used Portugal because those were all Catholic countries. They would have used all those countries to destroy this growing Protestant nation, And it would never have been established.
Speaker 0: Having had their power and influence greatly diminished, the Jesuits were unable to stop the American colonies from establishing a Protestant republic. That is to say the Jesuits were in no condition to coordinate a crusade against the new Protestant Republic as they had done with England in 15/88 by using the vanish Armada, but the Jesuits had won ace in the hole. Many of the founding fathers were Deists and Freemasons. They attended church services and publicly paid homage to the God of the bible, but in reality they did not believe in miracles or the divinity of Jesus Christ, their God was the great architect of the universe, not the God of the Bible. Thomas Jefferson went so far as to create his own Bible by cutting out verses he agreed with and pasting them into a blank book.
The verses Jefferson believed in were those where Jesus speaks of morality and loving others. Miracles such as the virgin birth or Jesus's resurrection were omitted since they were considered fables. Freemasons like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine had little regard for the divine miracle working Jesus of the Bible. Thomas Paine, author of the famous pamphlet Common Sense, wrote a book called The Age of Reason. In it, Paine says, Jesus Christ wrote no account of himself.
The history of him is altogether the work of other people. And as to the account given of his resurrection and ascension, it was the necessary counterpart to the story of his birth. His historians, having brought him into the world in a supernatural manner, were obliged to take him out again in the same manner. Thus, when it came time to create a document that would unite these colonies into 1 country, the Jesuits had an idea many preferred. It was called religious liberty.
The First Amendment to the Constitution would allow all religions to exist in America, not just religions based on the Protestant Bible. In the new American Republic, Roman Catholicism was allowed to coexist with the Protestant denominations as well as the deistic free masons, but most importantly, the Roman Catholics were allowed to vote just like any other citizens. This was key as we shall see later on. For has their numbers increased, Roman Catholics could put in power other Roman Catholics or those who are sympathetic to them and changed the nation from within.
Speaker 1: After the, revolutionary war, voting rights of Catholics did change. We know that one of the signers of the constitution was a Roman Catholic. There was only 1, mister Carroll. But, nonetheless, it made it look like a place for Roman Catholics to come, as well as Protestants to have religious liberty, which is absurd. The Roman Catholic people had been used by the priest to kill us for centuries, and so why not stay in Europe?
Well, they were being used by the Jesuits to come here to ultimately then take over political power And then submit North America to the feet of the Pope.
Speaker 0: Turning from the happenings with the American colonies. Let us take a moment to investigate what the Jesuits were up to in Europe after their suppression. As we might guess, the Jesuits were not idle. They decided to seek revenge against those who had turned on them, specifically a traitorous Pope and the Catholic Monarchs of Europe. In 17/74, a year after the Jesuits were disbanded forever.
Speaker 2: Pope Clement the 14th Had suppressed the Jesuits. And, a short time later, he was poisoned. Poison is a big thing with these guys.
Speaker 0: Pope Clement stated, alas, I knew they would poison me, but I did not expect to die in so slow and cruel a manner. A postmortem examination of his body revealed the presence of a poison. Thus, the Jesuits rid themselves of a troublesome Pope. The vendetta on the Catholic Monarchs of Europe was approached in a less obvious manner. Cleverly, the Jesuits determined not to act in their own name, but decided to work through front groups and to have them take the blame for their revenge.
In this way, the Jesuits would continue to appear to be disbanded and innocent of any involvement in the matter. The 1st front group the Jesuits used was called the Illuminati. The Illuminati was organized in Bavaria by a Jesuit professor, Adam Weishaupt, on May 1, 17, 76, just 3 years after the Jesuits were disbanded. Many sources only casually mentioned that Weishaupt was a former Jesuit, and they usually state he was an ex Jesuit. In reality, Weisaupt never left the order.
As for the order itself, it never was truly disbanded.
Speaker 1: In Bavaria, when the Illuminati was founded in 17/76 by Adam Weishaupt. Weishaupt is used by the Jesuits then to continue the work of the Jesuit order under another name. Weishaupt never repudiated the Jesuits. That's a lie of many, many conspiratorial historians controlled by the Pope. They wanna create this dichotomy between the Illuminati and the Jesuits.
Never fall for it. Weishaupt was operating under orders from a Superior Richie at the time was a general, then later another superior. Well, Weishaupt then enters into an alliance with The House of Rothschild. So now we see the Rothschilds, the Jewish Rothschilds, Red Shield, Become the bankers for the Jesuit order during the upheaval we are we will know as the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars. So this alliance between the Jesuits and the House of Rothschild, these high level Masonic Jews, is very important to realize at this point because we have to live with it and deal with it today.
Also, Bavaria is the stronghold of the Jesuits. There was a huge inquisitional torture chamber there in Nuremberg. Interesting that the Nuremberg trials of the Nazis would be held there.
Speaker 4: And the very principles of the Illuminati, the way the organization was run, It's the very principles of the Jesuit order, and that's found in in Nestor Webster's book called Secret Societies.
Speaker 0: In 18/14, Francois Charles de Berghiem reported on Germany's secret societies and stated, the oldest and most dangerous association is that which is generally known under the denomination of the Illumians, and of which the foundation goes back towards the middle of the last century, Bavaria was its cradle. It is said that it had for founders several chiefs of the order of the Jesuits. Through the Illuminati, the Jesuits sought to take over various powerful secret societies, especially the higher degrees of freemasonry.
Speaker 4: If you study all of the different different organizations in the world, whether it be the Knights of Malta, the Bilderbergers, The Club of Rome, the Council on Foreign Relations, as you study all these different groups, and the Knights of Malta Would be included in that. You find that they are like a buffer behind which the Jesuit order operates.
Speaker 0: In his book, Proofs of a Conspiracy, John T Robinson wrote concerning the masonic lodges. At this time, 17/98, the Jesuits interfered considerably, insinuating themselves into the lodges, Robinson went on to say, this society is well known to have put on every shape and to have made use of every mean that could promote the power and influence of the order, and we know that at this time, they were by no means without hopes of reestablishing the dominion of the Church of Rome in England. And with the Illuminati and the higher orders of freemasonry, the Jesuits fomented the destruction of the very monarchs who would oppose them beginning with the French revolution and later with Napoleon Bonaparte.
Speaker 1: The French revolution was launched and waged by the Jesuits using, Grand Orient Freemasonry and Scottish Rite Freemasonry in England for the purpose of punishing the Roman Catholic Monarchs of Europe, Taking back the Vatican Empire from the Pope, tearing away the colonies from England, Protestant England. They were doing several things at one time. Remember, the Jesuits are the great Hegelians. They can think along 10, 20, Fifty different lines at the same time and coordinate them all together. So to understand what we do, we have to think dialectically.
We can never think linearly. So the purpose of the French Revolution, first and foremost, was to punish the Roman Catholic Monarchs of Europe. And that they did. What happened? Why they beheaded Louis the 16th.
The grandson of Louis the 15th. We're gonna teach you bourbons of France, who you mess with, whom you suppress the gentleness. And then we're going to behead his wife, Marie Antoinette. And she was the daughter, Maria Theresa. She was a Hapsburg.
So we're gonna punish you Hapsburgs. You suppress us, we're gonna cut off the head of Marie Antoinette using our Jacobins. And then you Berganzas of Portugal, we're gonna drive you into exile using Napoleon. They did. They had to go into South America.
And you bourbons in Spain, we're gonna drive you in exile too. We're gonna have Napoleon set up a little Banana Republic up here in Spain. And, so and then the Knights of Malta, how dare you kick us off your island of Malta in 17/68? We're gonna teach you a lesson. So they took Napoleon down here with his with his huge fleet, took all the treasures of the Knights of Malta, and took all their weapons so that they could use that in the invasion Of Egypt, at which time, the Jesuits used Napoleon to kill all the Mamluks, the bodyguard of the caliph of Egypt.
So now they're waging war against Islam like they are today.
Speaker 0: When Napoleon's usefulness came to an end, the Jesuits had him betray his soldiers in a war with Russia. Like many of the founding fathers of America, the French soldiers were very nationalistic and they would be a problem in the future plans of the Jesuits. After his defeat in Russia, Napoleon was forced to abdicate. Working in the shadows, the Jesuits made sure he was kept in reserve should he be needed. So Napoleon was sent to the island of Elba and given an annual pension of CHF2,000,000.
Then on August 7, 18/14, the unthinkable occurred. Pope Bias the 7th restored the Jesuit order.
Speaker 1: Jesuits were revived in 18/14, with the papal bull by Pope Pius the 7th, Which brought them back into existence.
Speaker 0: The suppression of the Jesuits was to last forever. It only lasted 41 years. Former US president John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson in 18/16 about the rebirth of the Jesuits and the danger they posed to America, Adam stated plainly. I do not like the resurrection of the Jesuits. They have a general now in Russia in correspondence with the Jesuits in the United States who are more numerous than anybody knows.
Shall we not have swarms of them here in as many disguises as only a king of the gypsies can assume? Dressed as painters, publishers, writers, and schoolmasters? I have lately read Pascoe's letters over again and 4 volumes of the history of the Jesuits. If ever any congregation of men could merit eternal perdition on Earth and in hell, it is this company of Loyola. Jefferson replied back to Adams.
Like you, I disapprove of the restoration of the Jesuits, for it means a step backward from light into darkness. Coincidentally, the restoration of the order occurred 1 month before the first meeting of the Congress of Vienna in 18/14, the Jesuits were deeply involved in this meeting. When the monarchs of Europe began fighting among themselves, the Jesuits manipulated the circumstances to bring Napoleon back for an encore performance. The famous 100 days. The monarchs gathered in Vienna came to turns quickly in order to meet this renewed threat.
The Jesuits careful manipulation of the events being played out like a chess game. Again, it must be remembered that the Society of Jesus never wanted to do away with kings. The Jesuits only wanted to punish those who had suppressed the order? In March of 18/15, 9 days after the Congress of Vienna ended, Napoleon led his patriotic monarchy hating men to defeat by attacking the wrong spot of the British lines at Waterloo.
Speaker 1: The Battle of Waterloo was deliberately lost by Napoleon as explicated by our great southern general, Thomas Jonathan Stonewall Jackson, when he reviewed the battlefield and you can find this in Dabney's great work with his, biography that he wrote on Stonewall Jackson called the life and times of Stonewall Jackson. And when Jackson went there, he said, Napoleon attacked from the wrong position. He should have attacked over here. And exact exactly what happened. Napoleon deliberately sacrificed his army at Waterloo so that there would be The least amount of true patriots in France to resist the return of King Louis the eighteenth into France, we immediately restored the Jesuits Anne restored the acquisition.
Speaker 0: Having no further need of Napoleon, the Jesuits made sure he was sent far away to the island Saint Helena in the South Atlantic. While there, he was poisoned and died in 18/21. In his memoirs, Napoleon maintained his loyalty to the Catholic church, but had this to say about the Jesuits. The Jesuits are a military organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father Abbott of a monastery.
And the aim of this organization is power. Power in its most despotic exercise, absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man. We have stated that the Jesuits were deeply involved in the Congress of Vienna, ostensibly, this meeting of the monarchs of Europe under the direction of the Jesuits was for the purpose of reorganizing Europe, restoring the balance of power and discussing the creation of a federation of Europe. According to author Burke McCarty, the Congress of Vienna and several other secret meetings were in reality black conspiracy against popular governments.
Speaker 4: After the constitution is signed, protestant principles are put in place in the United States. You go into the early 1800. The Napoleonic wars are being fought in Europe, in Russia. But finally, the Napoleonic wars have stopped. All of the monarchs of Europe convene in Vienna, Austria.
The man who headed it was Clemens von Metterninch of Austria. Russia was there. England was there. France was there. They all came there to Vienna to decide on a big problem in the world.
There were governments of the people, by the people and for the people that were being established. And these monarchs of Europe and the pope himself, pope Pius the 7th, And the newly formed, reestablished Jesuit Order in 18/14. They all came together and they said, If we don't destroy these free popular governments, eventually, the principles of those governments will destroy us. So at the Congress of Vienna, it was voted that they would pursue the destruction of any free governments in this world. And in 18/14, the 1 government That was the thorn in their side was the United States of America.
Speaker 0: 8 years after the Congress of Vienna, the same parties met in Verona, Italy for a second meeting to discuss the United States of America and the threat of popular governments. For posterity sake on April 25th, 1916, senator Robert l Owen of the United States Congress entered into the congressional record, the secret treaty of Verona that was signed by the monarchs of Europe. These kings of Europe under the control of the pope called themselves the Holy Alliance. The first article stated, the high contracting powers engage mutually in the most solemn manner to use all their efforts to put an end to this system of representative governments. The 3rd article gave special thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations.
Speaker 2: Now the Treaty of Verona was an agreement between the Catholic Monarchies of Europe and the Vatican to destroy the concept of representative government worldwide.
Speaker 4: Samuel b Moore shows conclusively That Medtner Nitsch and the Jesuit order and Pope Pius the 7th, they all agreed that The way that they would destroy the United States would be by sending as many Catholic immigrants To the American shores as they possibly could. So thousands and thousands of Catholics were sent to the United States. Thousands and thousands of Catholic priests and many Jesuit coagitators were sent to America to take over and destroy this government.
Speaker 0: The treaty was signed on November 22, 18/22 in Verona, Italy by Metternich of Austria, Chateaubriand for France, Bernstead for Prussia and Nessel Road for Russia. After reading the secret treaty, senator Owens pointed out that the threat under the secret treaty of Verona to suppress popular governments in the American republics is the basis of the Monroe doctrine. This secret treaty sets forth clearly the conflict between monarchical government and popular government, and the government of the few as against the government of the many.
Speaker 4: Because of the congresses at Vienna and Verona in 18/14 and 18 22. There was an English statesman who was at both of those meetings. His name was Lord George Canning. And in, Burke McCarty's book called The Suppressed Truth About the Assassination of Lincoln, It says in there that George Canning warned the United States government as to what was going on. Canning was in Contact with a man by the name of John Quincy Adams, who was a congressman at that time.
He wrote to Adams. He said, The monarchs of Europe, the pope, and the Jesuits are planning to destroy America. Quincy Adams took the information to the president at that time, a man by the name of Jim Monroe. We know him as James Monroe. James Monroe took the information, wrote to a former president who was Still alive at that time, the man's name was Tom Jefferson, who was in retirement at Monticello.
Jefferson wrote back to Monroe and he said, this is the greatest affront to America since the revolution. He said, we need to do everything we can to oppose and stop this holy alliance set up By the monarchs of Europe, the Pope, and the Jesuit order.
Speaker 0: In his letter to Monroe in 18/23, Jefferson said he did not want to pass up an opportunity of declaring our protest against the atrocious violations of the rights of nations by the interference of anyone in the internal affairs of another, so begun by Bonaparte and now continued by the equally lawless alliance calling itself holy.
Speaker 4: America's response to these 2 congresses was James Monroe's State of the Union address called the Monroe doctrine, Where he told the powers of Europe, he said, you stay over there, you fight your wars in Europe, We'll stay over here. If you ever colonize in the Western Hemisphere, we will consider it an act of war. That was the Monroe Doctrine. But in our history books today, We read nothing of the role of the Pope and the Jesuit order to destroy America. Nothing is in our books today to that effect.
But that's why the Monroe doctrine was written.
Speaker 0: The Jesuits convened a meeting in Sheree, Italy in 18/25 to discuss tactics for dealing with the Protestant nations. Unknown to the 13 Jesuits gathered for this clandestine meeting, a young novice named Leoni was in the adjoining library. Leoni could not believe his ears and began to take notes of what was being said for posterity. An English translation appeared in 18/48. What Leoni heard was no less than the Jesuit plan for world domination and the destruction of heretics, especially the heretics in Protestant America.
As to the Jesuit plan for world government, you well know that what we aim at is the Empire of the world. As to their plan for working in secret, let us prefer a secret war, which though less brilliant is more sure to bring us the advantage. Let us shun too much light. As to the pope, also known as the vicar of Christ, we may say that God designs for extermination like the Canaanites, all the nations that obstinately refuse to enter into the unity of the church and that the vicar of Jesus Christ is appointed to execute these judgments in due time. As to Protestant and non Roman Catholics who do not join Rome.
We have, however, one source of rejoicing. We cherish at the bottom of our hearts this principle that whatever does not unite with us must be annihilated. That Protestantism must therefore be utterly abolished. As to the Bible, then the Bible, that serpent, which with head erect and eyes flashing fire, threatens us with its venom whilst it trails along the ground. Shall be changed again into a rod as soon as we are able to seize it.
And what wounds will we not inflict with it upon these hardened pharaohs and their cunning magicians? The Monroe doctrine was ratified in 18/23. The Jesuit meeting in Sherry, Italy took place in 18/25. 1 year later John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died on the same day. Both of these former presidents and defenders of the constitution died on July 4, 18/26.
What are the odds that these 2 men so critical to the birth of the United States an enemies of the Holy Alliance, the Vatican and the Jesuits would die on the same day. The day they died was the 50th anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration of Independence, autopsies were not performed on the former presidents, and it was assumed that they died of natural causes. Another strange coincidence would be the death of James Monroe on yet another 4th July in 18/31. Monroe left office in 18/25 and supposedly died of tuberculosis 6 years later. It should be noted that the symptoms associated with arsenic poisoning, difficulty in breathing, dryness and tightness of the throat, seizures, and burning pain are similar to those of tuberculosis, George Morgan commented on these strange circumstances in his book, The Life of James Monroe.
Morgan states, as John Adams and Thomas Jefferson had died on the 4th 5 years before, Monroe's death added to the wonder as though a power aloft had taken cognizance of the peculiar patriotism of these mortal men and had translated them, is it possible that the power aloft was not from heaven and was not benign? Perhaps this power was not looking at the nationalism and patriotism of these men with joy as much as with a vengeful eye. As the Jesuit oath clearly states, a Jesuit vows to make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly against all heretics, Protestants and liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poison cup, the strangulation cord, the steel of the poniard, or the leaden bullet. Others have even pointed out George Washington's sudden death in 17/99 as very suspicious.
Speaker 1: There is evidence that the Jesuits assassinated a few American presidents before the war between the states. The 1st president they assassinated was George Washington. He was poisoned with anthrax. One of his 3 attending physicians was behind that poisoning. Remember, from the day he took sick to the day he died, Was a mere two to two and a half days according to Headley's great work, the life of Washington.
So he was murdered.
Speaker 0: Why would the Jesuits want to kill George Washington? Like Jefferson, Adams, and Monroe, Washington was first and foremost a nationalist and warned against foreign influence. He promoted a policy of neutrality and the avoidance of European alliances, Washington repeated his isolationist policy in his farewell address that was published in newspapers throughout the country, Washington wrote, it is our policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world. Besides this admonition to avoid foreign alliances, Washington loudly declared America should keep itself free from foreign influence. Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, I conjure you to believe me fellow citizens, the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake.
In addition to these publicly expressed opinions, Washington had acted swiftly to put down the Jacob inspired whiskey rebellion in 17/93 with 15,000 troops. Instigating the rebellion was the French ambassador, Edmond Gannett and the revolutionary democratic clubs that had sprung up in America, Gannett and the democratic clubs were linked to the Jacobin clubs in France. In her book, world revolution Nestor Webster states, these Jacobin clubs were organized by the revolutionary committee under the direct inspiration of the Bavarian Illuminati. The Jesuits created the Illuminati and were thus working through the democratic clubs in America. Washington never realized he was taking on the Jesuits when he crushed the Whiskey Rebellion.
John Adams became president after Washington left office. During John Adams' administration, war with Illuminati controlled France was averted, but Washington made it known he would not resist a call from Congress to assume command of the army. Furthermore, Washington endorsed the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts that were designed to protect the United States from the extensive French Jacobin conspiracy, it is therefore no wonder that the vengeful eye of the Jesuits was focused on George Washington. After leaving office in 17/97, Washington lived only 2 years 9 months. From the onset of his illness in 17/99 to his death was a mere 2 days.
As with Monroe's death, the symptoms leading up to Washington's death were difficulty in breathing, tightness of the throat, and burning pain. Washington was only 67 years old when he died. Like Jefferson, Adams and Monroe, there was no autopsy with Washington's death. However, the Jesuits made sure they had a servant on hand, Tobias Lear to carefully plant the story that Washington had neglected to take off his wet clothes after coming in from his day of riding about his farms in snowy weather, Washington had taken cold undoubtedly from being so much exposed the day before, and complained of a sore throat. Lear said this even though Washington explicitly told him that his great coat had kept him dry.
According to Lear, we are to believe that George Washington who survived the hardship of a winter at Valley Forge and other severe winters did not know how to take care of himself in bad weather. The more likely truth is that Washington had opposed the plans and schemes of the Society of Jesus and was assassinated for his interference. Other American presidents both in the 19th 20th centuries who would run afoul of the Jesuits order would meet untimely deaths. For instance, the short presidency of William Henry Harrison. Harrison had been elected president on March 4, 18/41.
He would serve as president for only 35 days. At the end of March, the newly elected president came down suddenly with an illness and died. Many thought this was the result of his long inaugural address, which lasted over 2 hours in cold weather, but Harrison had been fine after the speech and weeks had passed since the inauguration. Why was Harrison assassinated? One only has to go to his inauguration address to find the main reason.
Harrison stated in the 4th paragraph of his speech, we admit of no government by divine right believing that so far as power is concerned, the beneficent creator has made no distinction amongst men that all are upon inequality and that the only legitimate right to govern is an express grant of power from the governed. Like other leaders in the past, Harrison was thumbing his nose against the Holy Alliance, who practiced the divine right of kings to wield power as sanctioned by the Pope, Harrison was also unwilling to accept Texas, a slave territory, into the union which ran against the Jesuit plan of using the slave issue to agitate and divide the northern states from the southern states. Unlike Adams, Jefferson, and Monroe, the Jesuits did not wait for the 4th July to eliminate the heretical president Harrison. Harrison was poisoned at the end of March and died on April 4, 18/41. Vice president John Tyler succeeded Harrison as president.
The annexation of Texas was accomplished in 18/45 under the watchful eye of the new president, another president who died suddenly in office was Zachary Taylor. Taylor was elected president in 18/48. Taylor was a southern slaveholder who did not want to see slavery extended to any more areas of the country. Like Washington, Taylor was devoted to the union of the American States, was very popular and was a military man. Another crisis over slavery occurred by the Jesuits in 18/50.
A compromise was being pushed to avert a split in the union, Taylor did not like the compromise being worked out in congress. On July 4, 1850, Taylor attended the groundbreaking ceremonies for the Washington Monument, he was fine upon returning back to the presidential mansion. Then he became ill after eating some raw fruit that some say was a bowl of cherries. A violent fever came upon him. Senator Benton commented that the violent attack commencing soon after his return to the presidential mansion.
Old Rough and Ready frustrated his assassins and managed to fight the poison for 5 days and avoided the 4th July curse. President Taylor died on July 9th. The Jesuits removed a strong unifying leader and replaced him with a more malleable president in Millard Fillmore. Filmore signed the compromise in 1850, just 2 months after Taylor's death. As the Jesuit agitation of the American states was reaching its climax in the 18 fifties, a trial occurred in 18/55 at a courthouse in Illinois that would bring 2 faithful men together.
These 2 men would join forces to fight the Jesuits. The first was a rebellious Roman Catholic priest by the name of Charles Chinequi. The second was a lawyer by the name of Abraham Lincoln. Charles Geniqui did not approve of the corrupt conduct of many of the priests he knew. These evil priests were drunkards, sexually promiscuous, and thieves, often stealing money and property collected from their parishioners.
Speaker 2: The priesthood in Chicago was very corrupt morally and, every other way. I mean, they were Drinking heavily, they would go on these retreats, and take up a collection between themselves, put it all in a pot And go out and, buy a
Speaker 1: lot of
Speaker 2: booze and they also rented a lot of hookers. Apparently, there's a lot of, you know, sexual deviance going on at the time as well? And he didn't like that though. When he tried to change it, he quoted exclusively from the Bible And his bishop just could not tolerate that.
Speaker 0: The heads of the Roman church wanted to ignore these illicit and illegal activities. When he did not, bishop Reagan of Chicago and another priest by the name of LaBelle arranged to have Chinoqui accused of rape. Chinequi needed a good attorney. An attorney by the name of Abraham Lincoln was suggested.
Speaker 2: Abraham Lincoln had a Team of other lawyers under him, right, it's like a regular defense team. Lincoln being 1 lawyer, a gentleman by the name of Stephen r Moore, was another lawyer. And that was a big court case at the time. It was the most important court case that Lincoln ever had in his entire legal career, as a matter of fact, But it's been buried by the Illinois government.
Speaker 0: The trial did not go well for Chinookwee. The general feeling was that he would be convicted.
Speaker 2: Local newspapers of the time, they speculated that Chiniki was going to be found guilty, and, that was being broadcast, throughout the entire Catholic community at that time.
Speaker 0: Fortunately, for Genically, a witness came forward for the defense. Her name was Filamine Schwartz. Miss Schwartz had been in Father Labelle's house the day the plot to frame Chinequi had been concocted. Schwartz contacted Lincoln and agreed to testify.
Speaker 2: She caught the midnight train to Urbana and met up with Abraham Lincoln, And explain to me exactly what happened.
Speaker 0: Once Bishop Reagan and Father LaBelle found out about the potential witness, they fled the city. The prosecution dropped the charges and Chinequi was vindicated. As they left the courtroom, Charles Chinequi was in tears.
Speaker 1: Lincoln says to him, why are you crying, mister Chinquiry? He says your agents have your enemies have fled, and you're free to go. And he said, I'm not crying for myself, mister Meakin. I'm crying for you. He said, Because I saw no less than 11 Jesuits With the sentence of death on their face today in this courtroom.
And know for a surety they will kill you for what you have done. Lincoln says, well, let this be my death warrant. And he gives Geniqui a bill for a mere $50. And then Lincoln sobers up and said it matters not where a man must die, but that he must die at the post of duty and honor.
Speaker 0: Chiniqui's words of warning to Lincoln would prove to be true, the conspiratorial hand of the Jesuits at work, a conspiracy to further their goal of a world under papal control. Abraham Lincoln was elected president of the United States 5 years after Charles Chinequi's trial, by 18/60 agitation between the North and the South was so great that many of the southern states decided to leave the union over Lincoln selection. This agitation was designed from the beginning to drive a wedge between the north and the south and bring about a war that would result in the death of countless protestants, clearing the way for the Jesuits to reconstruct America into a tool of conquest. Lincoln had no military background. And the perception in the south was that he was incapable of mounting a war to stop the southern states from leaving the union.
However, the Jesuits had studied Lincoln and knew he would be a very effective leader. In his own way, Lincoln would serve the Jesuit ends. Those ends were, 1, to kill protestants who lived mainly in the south, and 2, to undermine the constitution, especially the doctrines of state sovereignty and state's rights. Once in office, Lincoln refused to accept the right of any state to leave the union. He also refused to remove the federal troops from Fort Sumter under the command of major Robert Anderson, who was a freemason, has tensions mounted.
The Jesuit controlled freemasons on both sides turned the standoff into a bloody war.
Speaker 1: It's no coincidence that general Beauregard, a Roman Catholic freemason, fired the 1st shots at Fort Sumter, And it's no coincidence that a Presbyterian Protestant freemason incited those shots to be fired When he sent down the Star of the West to reinforce Fort Sumter, and that was Mason James Buchanan. James Buchanan Started the war when he sent down the Star of the West, that ship to reinforce the harbor because the southern states had lawfully seceded If we had a union of consent, and I would like to add here that the 3 states that that specifically reserved their right to secede And their state ratification papers were Virginia, Rhode Island, and New York. And if those 3 states reserved the right to secede, to withdraw the powers, the specific powers they had delegated to Washington, And every other state had the right. So the Southern states had the right to secede. The North had no right to stop it.
So therefore, an attack against the Southern states who had seceded was an act of war, and therefore, it was indeed a war of Northern aggression against the Southerners who had rightfully seceded.
Speaker 0: As the war progressed, it was obvious that not all was as it appeared to be on the surface. Time and again, generals on both sides made blunders and missed opportunities that would have ended the war sooner rather than later. The most glaring of these missed opportunities was the 1st battle of the conflict, the 1st battle of Manassas on July 21, 18/61. Lincoln had ordered the invasion of the south by union troops. To stop them, southern forces were moved into position in Virginia under Brigadier General Joseph e Johnston and Brigadier General P.
G. T. Beauregard. Beauregard had ordered the firing of the 1st shot at Fort Sumter. And his family was not only Roman Catholic, but also had Jesuit ties.
During the course of the battle, the confederate forces were beaten back until Colonel Thomas j Jackson stood his ground against the invading northern army. Stonewall Jackson's heroic stand paved the way for the routing of the invading union forces that soon withdrew towards Washington DC. Incredibly, the southern commanders, Beauregard and Johnston, did not pursue the defeated union troops, although prompted by many, including Stonewall Jackson. Johnston and Beauregard let the defeated northern troops escape. If they had pursued the Northern army, the South would have annihilated their enemy and ended the war in a few days.
Along with Johnston and Beauregard, there were other Southern generals who seemed at times to be working against the South. Take for instance, the legendary Robert E. Lee. It was General Robert E. Lee who ordered the disastrous Pickett's Charge at the Battle of Gettysburg on July 3, 18/63?
Author and historian Bevan Alexander states, Pickett's Charge was doomed before it started. Sending massed bodies of men across nearly a mile of open ground against emplaced riflemen and banked cannons was simply an invitation for destruction. Bevan Alexander goes on to say that by insisting on fighting the North at Gettysburg and ordering Pickett's charge, Lee had lost well over a third of his army and had destroyed the last offensive power of the Confederacy. It was also general Robert E. Lee who refused to listen to Stonewall Jackson concerning the South's overall strategy, Jackson realized that an offensive war against the North would result in the South's defeat.
No matter how skilled a battle leader Lee was, he could never win the war by pitting the far weaker resources of the South against the tremendous economic and military power of the north, Stonewall Jackson's plan was to avoid the northern strength, its field armies, and strike at Northern weakness. It's undefended factories, farms, and railroads. Jackson wanted to bypass the union armies and to win indirectly by assaulting the northern people's will to pursue the war, Jackson called this unrelenting war. Lee never fully accepted Jackson's view. However, a union general named William Tecumseh Sherman did.
Sherman's march from Atlanta to the sea conducting unrelenting war broke the back of the south in 18/64 and spelled the end of the conflict.
Speaker 1: Lee was the one responsible for the defeat of it and and Cheetham or Sharpsburg, when he left the the what was it? The order of 191, they wrapped up in a cigar. It was found by Yankee generals. Lee was behind that. Lee was behind not allowing Jackson to win at least 4 decisive battles against the Union forces.
And this is, spoken of it written very well in Bevan Alexander's great work, Lost Victories.
Speaker 0: It is also worthy to note this picture of Robert E. Lee at the age of 38 with his son, Lee is displaying a mason sign called the hidden hand. Compare that picture with these pictures. All display the same masonic gesture. That the Jesuits had infiltrated freemasonry in the late 1700 and had taken control of the leadership of this secret society was unknown to freemasons serving in both the northern and southern armies, essentially all Freemasons were serving the Jesuits and the pope.
Besides Lee's inactions and blunders on the battlefield, as well as those of other Confederate generals, a case can be made that the South's greatest general, Stonewall Jackson was murdered during the 4 day Battle of Chancellorsville. Lee being an accomplice.
Speaker 1: Jackson brings forth his plan to Lee how to flank Hooker's army, and then we can attack him from the rear. And Lee says, well, go ahead. Instead of saying praise God, yes, if we can defeat Hooker, can then march across the Potomac to Washington because that's all it would have taken. We were this close to keeping our liberty. But because Lee is in cahoots with Hooker and there are Jesuits who are observers on the battlefield, As there were at Gettysburg, an arrangement is made between Lee and AP Hill because AP Hill hated Jackson's guts.
Jackson had AP Hill arrested. This is general AP Hill. General Jackson had general AP Hill arrested for insubordination, And Hill hated him for it. And so this was Hill's chance to get back. So Hill happens to have a subordinate general underneath him Who then will be used to fire upon Jackson?
So Jackson, as he arranges His his soldiers, as they've flanked Hooker, and he tells them whatever you do, do not stop. You go you'd march right through the federal camp. Well, what happens is, if the Stop the whole movement. So everything is almost thrown in disarray. Finally, this guy's convinced.
Let's just keep going on. So by this time, they're losing valuable time. Still, it was a route, But it wasn't a defeat like it could have been. And Jackson realizes that something's very wrong. He is now betrayed by AP Hill, and he's betrayed by this their subordinate.
So in the evening, Jackson is reconnoering, trying to see what should be done, and he's fired upon by his own troops. And I show in my book that it was a conspiracy because some of the people there, Jackson, didn't know who they were. They were Confederate officers, and Jackson never seen him before. So Jackson is wounded, but it's not mortal. He's bleeding, but he's He's bleeding severely, but what happens is that major Maguire, the doctors called to his assistants.
Well, the doctor then takes him out off the way from the battlefield and amputates face the arm and, his left arm. And Jackson is, beginning to recover, but Lee orders him to be taken away from a battlefield by this doctor. And Jackson said, our men need our doctor. Why deprive our our hurting, dying men of this valuable doctor? I'm getting better.
O'Neil Lee gives the order to go to Guinea Station, take Jackson with you. And so Jackson is being taken there, And he's beginning to recover, and he's talking to the doctor. When can I get back? And so on. Well, the doctor gets him to Guinea Station and takes Jackson, Takes him away from the main house and takes him out to this little shack where only the doctor and he are allowed to be.
And it's there that this dirty freemason, Hunter Maguire, poisons Jackson, I believe, on about a Wednesday Or Thursday. And then Jackson's wife is able to come, and she sees him, but but Jackson's not well. His his His arm is is the famous picture of him where he's had his arm amputated, but you really don't see it. It's it's the the sleeve is still there. And but he's been poisoned for the 1st time.
And then Friday or Saturday, he's given the final poisoning and he can't survive. And so the doctor poisons him, and his wife has plead his wife, Julia, is pleading for him. Doctor, isn't there any more you can do for him? And so he dies. And with the death of Jackson, the poisoning of Jackson, then this very same wicked hunter Maguire poisons Jackson's right hand man who's also a preacher, Sandy Pendleton, colonel Pendleton, he poisoned him too.
So the Jesuits are busy using this doctrine to get rid of the True Southern Confederate leadership, Lee being a party to all of this.
Speaker 0: Like many others, Stonewall Jackson was getting in the way of Jesuit plans and had to be eliminated. At this point, we should take note of a man by the name of James Clark. Clark graduated from West Point in 18/29. After graduation, Clark was assigned to Louisiana. After a year of service, James Clark resigned his commission and converted to Catholicism.
In 18/44, Clark would become the 1st West Point graduate to join the Jesuits. Clark went on to teach mathematics and science at Georgetown University, and he became the president of Holy Cross, it was said that Clark took a lively interest in the doings of his former classmates. And just who were his former classmates? None other than Robert E. Lee and Joseph E.
Johnston. One can also include Jefferson Davis in this list since Davis graduated a year ahead of Clark. It can only be guessed as to what communications these former West Point graduates had with each other, but that a Jesuit was in communication with Lee, Johnston and Davis during the period of the war between the states is surprising and somewhat shocking. And what is even more shocking were the activities of Confederate president Jefferson Davis in 18/63. Protestant Jefferson Davis began corresponding with the Roman Catholic pope.
Speaker 1: Pope Pius the ninth, Who was completely in the hands of the Jesuit order at this time because he was not in their hands when he first became pope. He writes a letter to Jefferson Davis acknowledging him as the president of the United States.
Speaker 2: After the Battle of Gettysburg, there was a lot of correspondence that took place between the Davis government and the Vatican. The Davis government Appealing to the pope for official help and recognition, which pope Pius denied eventually did give him.
Speaker 0: Davis was no stranger to Roman Catholicism. He had entered the Dominican operated college of Saint Thomas Aquinas near Springfield, Kentucky for 2 years, he was the only protestant student at the school. Interestingly enough, the young Davis sought to become a Catholic, but was encouraged to remain protestant. 1 must ask why would the Roman Catholic church turned down a convert? Did the Roman church have plans for Davis that would be better served with him remaining a Protestant, after the war, Davis was sent a portrait of the pope.
Such a gift, said a great niece, was never before conferred on any but crowned heads. General Lee also had his own picture of Pope Pius the ninth noting that the Pope was the only sovereign in Europe who recognized our poor Confederacy, such was the attitude of these leaders of the Confederacy, men who were easily fooled or who were willingly playing along with the Jesuits plan. It was these men who led the Protestants of the South into a war that they had no intention of winning, shades of Korea, Vietnam, and the Gulf wars come to mind. It should be remembered that for all of its posturing and open statements of support for the South, the papacy was really not on the South side at all.
Speaker 1: The open but false policy of Rome was that the pope was on the side of the south. And Chinequi falls for this little delusion In his book, unfortunately, the secret but true policy of Rome was that Rome was completely on the side of the radical red Republicans in the North. Stevens, Sumner, Bingham, the list goes on and on. So because of this, the Jesuits Made a show that they were behind the South to create more animosity on the, part of the Northern Protestants against Southerners of the South because the pope's against us by siding with the South, when in fact, We wanted the utter annihilation of the southern provinces.
Speaker 0: Now, let us turn our attention to the Union Army. What was true with the southern generals? Lincoln, to his dismay, discovered what's also true with his northern generals. They had allegiances to others besides the Union and Lincoln. General George McClellan failed to employ his vastly superior forces to defeat Confederate general Lee on numerous occasions.
The most famous of which was at the Battle of Antietam. Historian James m McPherson has pointed out that the 2 court of troops McClellan kept in reserve were in fact larger than Lee's entire force. The reason for McClellan's reluctance to put his reserve into the fight was that as in previous battles, he was convinced he was outnumbered. It should also be pointed out that McClellan was a freemason. The question has to be asked, who was McClellan really listening to?
Lincoln or the Jesuit superior general? Earlier we noted general Lee's disastrous orders to general Pickett at the Battle of Gettysburg. At the same battle, union general George Meade allowed general Lee to scape, Mead was a Roman Catholic.
Speaker 1: And after Gettysburg, Lee is allowed to escape Because a Jesuit then rides into the camp of Roman Catholic general Meade, and Roman Catholic Meade refuses to pursue Lee's army It captures only 1 gun when the South could have been defeated right then and there, and there would not have been the rape, pillage, and plunder From 18/63 to 65, there would not have been the destruction of general Sherman from Atlantis and Savannah. There would have been the burning down of protestant Columbia. The the 4 protestant states of the South that were to be destroyed and plundered With Georgia, North and South Carolina, and Virginia, those are the states that were plundered. New Orleans was what? New Orleans was under the belt of the beast, but Roman Catholic Louisiana was not Persecuted.
But it was those 4 key Protestant southern states that were made war upon. That would not have happened had Lee not have been allowed to escape. And Chiniqui writes of this in his book when the Jesuit rode into the camp and spoke to Mead. So it was a war against the white Anglo Saxon Protestant Baptist People of the South perpetrated by not only the generals of the North, Grant, and Sheridan, and Sherman, and all those All those despicable criminals with their federal bandidi and their Roman Catholic Irishmen that they brought over here to Steal everything they could steal off the southern plantations and to rape the black southern women that were slaves. It was a general rapine So bad that many of the black men took their women into the swamps and to deliver them from this Yankee pillage.
It was a it was a complete and total grand theft and larceny of the southern people.
Speaker 0: In spite of the treacherous behavior on both sides, on April 9th, 18/65, General Robert E Lee surrendered his confederate army to General Ulysses, s Grant at the village of Appomattox courthouse in Virginia. 2 days later, on April 11th, Lincoln made a speech discussing post war America. In the speech, Lincoln spoke in a conciliatory manner toward the southern states. Let us all join in doing the acts necessary to restoring the proper practical relations between these states and the union, they never having been out of it. These words taken with the amnesty for all southerners that Lincoln had proclaimed in November of 18/63 show us that the president was not looking for further reprisals or punishments against the South.
However, Rome and the Holy Alliance wanted no amnesty for the South and going back to the hated constitution with states' rights in freedoms derived from the Bible, Lincoln had served his purpose. It was time for his removal.
Speaker 1: Lincoln was a useful tool thinking he was actually saving the Union because he wanted to restore the southern states On the same footing they had left the Union, which would have frustrated the purposes of the Jesuit order by making a consolidated empire Out of all the
Speaker 0: states. To ensure total chaos, the Jesuits decided Lincoln would not be the only target.
Speaker 2: So they came up with this, This plan to assassinate not just Abraham Lincoln, but the entire government.
Speaker 4: The South had lost the Civil War, so they were going to take out Abraham Lincoln, Vice President Andrew Johnson, The head of the Northern army, Ulysses S Grant, and the secretary of the state, William Seward, all in 1 night.
Speaker 0: On April 14, 18/65, only 5 days after Lee's surrender, the conspirator struck. Abraham Lincoln was shot while watching a play at Ford's Theater. He died the next morning, April 15th at 7:22 AM. Secretary of State Seward was attacked at his home. The assassin, Lewis Paine, repeatedly stabbed Seward and escaped.
Miraculously, Seward recovered from his wounds. Vice president Johnson's assassin, George Axelrod, lost his nerve at the last minute and fled the scene. And and General Grant avoided his assassin by leaving town earlier in the day to check on a sick friend. But who were these assassins? Most people know about John Wilkes Booth.
The man who pulled the trigger and killed Lincoln, but few realize that most of the conspirators were Roman Catholic. Even Booth had converted to Catholicism.
Speaker 4: It's clear that John Wilkes Booth, while he was a member of the Knights of the Golden Circle, At the time he was plotting Lincoln's assassination, he was also meeting in the home of a very devout Roman Catholic woman by the name of Mary Surratt, right in Washington, DC. And it was in her home That the plot to kill Lincoln was hatched.
Speaker 1: The Jesuits of Washington DC Put together the plot for the assassination. The Jesuit of power behind that plot was Bernardin f Wiggott.
Speaker 7: Jesuits under the stream of an induction, they were not directly to be involved. They only were the, the, the elements, the intellectual, element that will prepare this, the case of Abraham Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln, the president, was, killed by the Jesuits of Rome, but there was no a Jesuit there involved directly. Nevertheless, Was the jesus who prepare the plot against his life and prepare and train those who were to kill him? The invasion.
Speaker 0: Yes. To be sure, the assassins were also Southerners, but they were first and foremost Jesuit assassins and agents of the foreign dictator called the pope. Among the conspirators was Mary Seurat's son, John Seurat. His tale leads to the very doors of the papal palace in Rome.
Speaker 2: 4 of them were eventually hung and the rest were sent to prison for various lengths of time. Booth was killed in a barn, but The story around Seurat is absolutely amazing. Seurat, after the assassination, John Seurat escaped to, to Canada. Now the Southern government had a kitchen cabinet based in Montreal. So that's the 1st place he went was to Montreal.
And who's in Montreal to meet this This, surat was 2 priests, and they scrolled them away for about 6 months. At the same time, the government is looking all over for this guy. It's like the biggest manhunt in US history and they can't find him. And, so and here he is sitting in a in a, a little town outside of Montreal, Being protected by priests.
Speaker 1: The Jesuits were behind this assassination. They controlled Sirat. Sirat called time outside of Ford's Theater. John Wilkes Booth, does the shooting. The the guard the Secret Service guard who's supposedly, supposedly to be guarding the entranceway to the Booth of Lincoln, He just happens to leave his post, and he's never punished for it.
So the assassination takes place. Surratt escapes to Canada. He's taken to Liverpool. He's taken from there to Rome. He enlists in the Popesawave army.
And in 18/67, he is discovered through another, Roman Catholic who reveals the truth about it. And, he is then brought back to the United States and put on trial. He has 2 trials. And because Roman Catholics Have more allegiance to their priests in the canon law than they do our our country. When a Roman Catholic's on a jury, they can hang a jury And and let the murderer go free, and that's exactly what happened to John Sur.
Speaker 0: As a result of the Surat affair and the papal policy of not allowing Protestant churches within the city of Rome, the United States of America ended diplomatic relations with the Vatican in 18/67, but even with the end of diplomatic relations with the US, the Jesuits had achieved a great victory. First, hundreds of thousands of Protestants were dead. 2nd, much of the Protestant South lay in ruins. 3rd, forcing the South at gunpoint to stay in the union have dealt a severe blow to the constitution, and the concept of freedom. And lastly, Lincoln was dead and the Jesuits were avenged for his interference in the Chinequi trial and his attempt to restore the republic to its pre war state, adding insult to this situation, the Jesuit controlled radical Republicans in congress.
Men like Charles Sumner and Thaddeus Stevens were able to pass the Fourteenth Amendment in 18/68. The Fourteenth Amendment created a new type of citizen, a citizen of the United States, whereas before a man was a citizen of the state in which he was born. Citizenship was now at the national level. Ostensibly, this new citizenship was created to help the freed slaves, but in reality it was a measure that would allow the federal government to strip away constitutional rights from the people and replace those rights with privileges granted by the government.
Speaker 1: In Maxwell versus Dow of 18/99, the supreme court said that None of the bill of rights are privileges and immunities of 14th amendment US citizenship. And the great descent By John Marshall Harlan, the first Harlan must be read by every viewer as he goes out of his chair To say that we don't enjoy real liberty, that our rights of American freemen have been overthrown, And our Anglo Saxon liberties are gone. And then he reiterates in 1908 in Twining versus New Jersey, when Twining versus New Jersey comes out and says, the 1st Amendment, the 2nd Amendment, the 3rd Amendment, the 4th Amendment, the 5th Amendment, the 6th Amendment, the 7th Amendment, the 8th Amendment, none of those amendments are privileges and immunities Of United States citizenship under the 14th amendment. That's why in court, you take your 5th amendment privilege. That's why you you own a gun with a privilege.
That's why you worship god now by a privilege granted from Washington. This ought to make us irate. All we have is Soviet citizenship. But all of us are, whites and blacks were all slaves of the Jesuits from Washington DC. And when none of us have any absolute rights to limit the powers of Washington, the only thing that limits Washington's powers in the decisions of the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court's controlled by the Jesuits of Georgetown. You got 5 Roman Catholics sitting on it now.
Speaker 0: But why was it so important to the Jesuits to create a nation? In his book, A Constitutional View of the Law of the Late War Between the States, Alexander Stephens tells us why.
Speaker 1: In volume 2, Alexander Stephens tells us on page 650, the real reason Of the 14th amendment, quote, consolidation and empire. That's the purpose of the amendment. Consolidation of the states and empire. That's why I call it the Pope's Holy Roman 14th Amendment, corporate fascist socialist communist empire Created by this 14th amendment. He goes on and says, they have not as yet openly denied the federative character of the government.
However, in direct war upon its principles, their acts have been covertly aimed. This is an exceedingly important fact to be Specifically noted and kept in mind, these monstrous reconstruction measures, with all their enormities and fatal tendencies Towards ultimate complete centralism and empire are still based upon the assumption that the states, as separate integral parts, constitute members of what is still, in words, at least, acknowledged to be a federal union. All these bold usurpations of power are, Upon their face, nothing but resorts to induce or to compel under duress the peoples of the several southern states To go through the forms of adopting the 14th Amendment as an additional article to the constitution. So he then concludes, no system of representative government can be long maintained by any people who have not the intelligence to understand it, The patriotism to approve it and the virtue to maintain inviolate both its form and principles as established. So this is the reason for the 14th Amendment, consolidation and empire.
And this is what Andrew Johnson understood was the purpose, And so he campaigned against it. And he called Lee a hero if that was the real reason for this war, to keep this consolidation and empire from being formed. The 14th amendment was proclaimed, ratified on July 28, 18/68. That was the end of the Washington's Republic as established in 17/87. So our white Anglo Saxon, Protestant and Baptist Calvinist Federal Republic of these United States lasted from 17/87 To 18/68, and a new nation was established in 18/68, and that is called the, the American empire in my book, And it has existed from 18/68 to the present, and it is squarely in the hands of the papacy for two reasons, For destroying heretics, liberals, perfidious Jews, and infidel Muslims, and and Buddhists Over the last 100 years since the Spanish American war or since, really, the Indian War of the Great Plains, the War of the Great Plains from 18/60 to 18/90 Was the annihilation of the Native American Indians so that they could build an empire from sea to shining sea, a terrible crime.
And it was all led by, a Roman Catholic army general named Philip Sheridan, who was advised by the America's most powerful Western Jesuit at the time, Pierre De Schmitt, and it was as Philip Sheridan who said the only good Indian is a dead Indian.
Speaker 0: With the 14th amendment, the constitution of the founding fathers was tossed into the dustbin of history, and centralization of power in Washington DC was well underway. Now the American empire could begin in earnest. The American states, both in the north and south would be subservient to the federal government and would be essentially slaves to this new master. In rapid secession, the United States found itself in one war after another, the Spanish American War, World War one, World War to The Korean the Vietnam War the Cold War Gulf War War Gulf War 2, and a host of smaller police actions such as in Somalia, Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Libya. Looking over the last 150 years, one can discern the influence of the Jesuits in the initiation of these wars and conflicts for the purpose of building a world empire under their control.
Early in the 20th century, the Jesuits were determined to start a new European war. Germany expelled the Jesuits in 18/72.
Speaker 1: Russia had expelled the Jesuits in 18/20. France had expelled the Jesuits in 18/80. Britain had formally, although not in actuality, had formally expelled the Jesuits in 18/29. Every country in Europe Switzerland, 18/48. Every country in Europe had expelled the Jesuits except Belgium.
And so the Jesuits said, well, now, we're gonna have to punish these people, Because they obviously didn't learn the lesson of Napoleon Bonaparte. So what we're gonna do is we're gonna use Britain and we're gonna use America, and we're gonna have a second 30 years war. The first one was from 16/18 and then 16/48. The second one's gonna be from 1914 to 1945. We're gonna have World War one.
We're gonna have the Bolshevik Revolution. We're gonna have the Spanish Civil War. We're going to have World War 2. We're going to just have continued war for 30 years, and we're gonna control all the factions. We're gonna control the allies, and we're gonna control the axis.
Speaker 0: The assassination of archduke Franz Ferdinand was the spark that ignited the 1st world war. Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the heir apparent to the Austro Hungarian throne. His inclusive policy towards the Slavic peoples and lenient treatment of orthodox Christian Serbia made him unacceptable to Rome. He therefore could not be allowed to rule. The assassination was set for July 26, 1914.
Since the year 10/54, the Catholic church has been waging war against orthodox Christians. The orthodox Christians did not accept the supremacy of the pope. A war involving the major powers of Europe would be a perfect opportunity to have hundreds of thousands if not millions of orthodox serves and Russians killed. Afterwards, Rome would be in a better position to dominate these countries. Who shot the archduke?
Gavrilo Prince A member of the secret society called the Black Hand. The Black Hand was founded by Free Masons. During the trial, Princep testified that his colleague, Ciganovich, told me he was a freemason. And on another occasion, told me that the heir apparent, Franz Ferdinand, had been condemned to death by a Freemasons' Lodge. Even though a masonic group carried out the murder, all of Serbia was blamed.
It was never pointed out at that time that the assassins were linked to freemasonry and that its upper levels had been under the control of the Jesuits for nearly a century, after World War one, a movement was put in motion to have a world government that would help the nations of the world live in peace, a peace controlled by the Jesuits. When this world government or League of Nations failed to materialize, the Jesuits push forward plans to create a 2nd World War. Even before the end of World War one, the Jesuits had set in motion a plan to bring the Russian Orthodox Christians back into the fold of the Pope's control. Under the direction of their superior general, Vladimir Letovchowski, the Jesuits instigated the Bolshevik revolution in 1917. This revolution brought communism to Russia.
The Jesuits had been thrown out of Russia over a 100 years earlier, but now the leader of the Bolsheviks, Vladimir Lenin admitted the Jesuits back into Russia in 1922. Lenin proved fickle and showed signs of disloyalty to the Jesuits. For this, he was poisoned, and his replacement, Joseph Stalin, was ready to carry on with the Vatican's bidding. As a boy, Stalin had obtained a scholarship to attend Tiflis Theological Seminary. Openly, the school was orthodox Christianity.
But behind the scene, it was run by the Jesuits. In 1931, Stalin was interviewed by Emil Ludwig. Ludwig, do you not admit that the Jesuits have good points? Stalin, yes. They are systematic and persevering in working to achieve sordid ends, but their principal method is spying, prying, worming their way into people's souls and outraging their feelings.
Once in power, Stalin killed millions of people, both Jews and Orthodox Christians. He killed anyone who would resist the new Soviet state he created based on Marxism? What many failed to understand was that Marxism was based on the Jesuit slave plantations or reductiones in South America and sir Thomas More's book, Utopia.
Speaker 1: What the Jesuits did was is they were the masters of communism. Communism originates with the Roman Catholic traitor whose name was sir Thomas More. Sir Thomas More betrayed King Henry the 8th, gave his full allegiance to the pope, and for which reason, Thomas More was executed as a traitor, holding for the pope's temporal power over his allegiance to his king. Sir Thomas More is the author of Utopia. Utopia is the foundation for communism.
So communism is Romanism. In fact, the orders, the many communities of the Roman Catholic institution, the Jesuit order, the redemptorist, that goes on and on. They run on communist principles of universal equality. Communis is a Latin term. So therefore, communism is a brainchild of the Jesuits, but it has been made to look Jewish through implementing it through Marx And his communist manifesto financed also by another masonic bridge freemason, Engels.
Speaker 0: Besides establishing communism in Russia after World War one, the Jesuits sought to reestablish the pope's physical kingdom that had been taken from him in 18/71, on June 7, 1929, the Lateran Treaty was ratified which reestablished the Pope's domain called Vatican City. The new prime minister of Italy, Benito Mussolini, was instrumental in bringing about the treaty. The treaty occurred only a few months before the economic crash that started in America and quickly spread around the world called the Great Depression. Approximately
Speaker 1: $90,000,000 worth of gold in in lira. I think I think it was about a 1,000,000,000 worth of lira, something like that, was given to the papacy by the Italian government. So the for reparations, for lack of a better word, because we had been suppressed from 18/70 to 1920 29, you owe us all this money. So Benito Mussolini enslaves the Italian Catholic people, makes them pay this huge sum, which they didn't wanna pay. And what does the papacy do with this money?
Well, this treaty is in about February or March. In October, the Jesuits crashed the American stock market. And they used their their number one short seller, the Irish Roman Catholic Joseph P. Kennedy to do it. So they sell short.
The margin calls can't be met. The stock market crashes. And what happens? The Vatican takes their 1,000,000 of dollars that they got from Mussolini, and they invest it in all the corporations and businesses that are Busted on Wall Street and they buy it all for pennies. So by the time Wall Street comes back into power, the archbishop of New York completely controls All the major corporations in this country.
Speaker 0: As banks began to fail, the Federal Reserve did not act to pump money into the system, which it should have done had those in control of it wanted to keep the banks afloat. As the chaos lingered and many lost their jobs and were driven into poverty, the Jesuits created a dictatorship out of the office of the president of the United States. In March 1933, the new president Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed into law a state of national emergency. Under such a state of emergency, the constitution was set aside ostensibly for the public good until the emergency was canceled by the president. Roosevelt never canceled the emergency.
This was verified in 1973 by the church Mathias Committee and published in senate report 93 dash 549. No American president since then has canceled the emergency. And even though congress passed the National Emergency Termination Act in 1974, this termination was in name only. The reality was that the emergency powers taken were never returned. They continued in the US code as permanent powers.
Thus, we are currently in a state of emergency or dictatorship. It should also be noted that Roosevelt was a 32nd degree freemason. FDR was obliged to follow the orders of the head of this secret society. His oath to freemasonry superseded his oath to the US constitution. And as we have seen, the man in control of freemasonry was the Jesuit superior general.
In Germany, the Vatican had in place Adolf Hitler, it is usually not emphasized, but Hitler was a Roman Catholic. Hitler praised the Roman Catholic church saying that until now, there has never been anything more grandiose on the earth than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic church. Heinrich Himmler, Hitler's head of the SS, was also a Roman Catholic. Frederick Hoffett wrote, Hitler, Goebbels, Himmler and most members of the party's old guard were Catholics. After the war, Walter Schellenberg, former head of German counter espionage stated, the SS organization had been constituted by Himmler according to the principles of the Jesuit order.
Himmler's title as supreme commander of the SS was to be the equivalent of the Jesuits general. Incredibly, although he killed and tortured 1,000,000, the Vatican never excommunicated Hitler. In fact, not one of the mass murderers of the third Reich was ever excommunicated by the Vatican. The day Hitler died, the Spanish dictator, Franco, also a Roman Catholic, had this statement run-in the publication Reforma. Adolf Hitler, son of the Catholic church, died while defending Christianity.
As a loyal son, Hitler killed heretics including Protestants, Jews, Orthodox Christians, and even liberal Catholics. All told, the war dead numbered between 82 to 78,000,000 people. 11,000,000 of the total dead from World War 2 died in concentration camps, 6,000,000 being Jews, the Jewish Holocaust was never condemned by Pope Pius the 12th, or for that matter by any other pope. Why this silence? The Jews, like all heretics, resisted conversion to Roman Catholicism an obedience to the pope.
Who financed Hitler? The answer is clear and easily verified. The Vatican and many of the wealthy elite in the west gave Hitler the money he needed to build the Third Reich. As early as 1919, archbishop Eugenio Pacelli met a young Adolf Hitler in Munich. The meeting occurred at night while all the household was asleep except for the nun who attended archbishop Pacelli.
Her name was Pasolini. According to Pascaline, Hitler told Pacelli that he was out to check the spread of aesthetic communism in Munich and elsewhere. It did not come as a surprise to her therefore in light of Peceli's hatred of the reds to see the present Hitler with a large cash of church money to aid the rising revolutionary and his small struggling band of anti communists. Go quell the devil's work. Help spread the love of almighty God, Pacelli told Hitler.
For the love of almighty God, she heard the young man, Adolf Hitler reply. Money for this young revolutionary also came from industrialists in the west.
Speaker 1: Hitler's rise to power was financed by London and New York and Berlin, they were the Knights of Malta running the banking Institutions of the world.
Speaker 0: In the discipline of historical research, one of the greatest taboo subjects is to look into who financed Hitler. The answer is clear and easily verified. The Vatican and many of the wealthy elite in the west gave Hitler the money he needed to build the Third Reich. Many do not realize that Prescott Bush, the grandfather of President George W. Bush and George Herbert Walker, the maternal great grandfather of president George W Bush were Nazi collaborators.
Along with Avril Harriman, they set up Union Banking Corporation as a complex money laundering operation for a number of Nazi front businesses, documents at the National Archives and the Library of Congress show conclusively that Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker should have been tried for treason because their Nazi dealings continued after the US entered World War 2.
Speaker 8: They had continued to do business with their primary Nazi patron, who was Fritz Thyssen, who backed Hitler beginning in 1921 and who was the wealthiest man in Germany and a steel and coal baron who with his partner, Friedrich Flick, essentially built the Nazi war machine along with IG Farben. In 1951, when Fritz Thiesen died in Argentina, Union Banking Corporation was liquidated by the US government, And Prescott Bush received $1,500,000 for his holdings in his Nazi business, and that was the beginning of the Bush family Fortune for all intents and purposes. George Bush doesn't take his philosophical foundation from the Bible or the teachings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount. George Bush takes his inspiration from what he learned in Skull and Bones and from the Fool Society that Hitler and Goebbels and Goring cut their teeth in, Bohemian Grove, these evil organizations that perpetrate the ugly things that these criminals are doing to this country for which they must be held accountable.
Speaker 0: The Jesuits created the Illuminati in 17/76. The American branch of the Illuminati was called Skull and Bones and has its headquarters at CIA recruiting ground Yale University. Prescott Bush was a member as was his son and grandson, President George W. Bush, it is interesting that in the 2004 presidential election, 2 skull and bones members ran against each other.
Speaker 6: You were both in Skull and Bone, the secret society.
Speaker 0: It's so secret we can't talk about it.
Speaker 6: What does that mean for America? The conspiracy theorists are gonna go watch.
Speaker 0: I'm sure they are. I don't know. I haven't seen the webinar.
Speaker 6: Number 322?
Speaker 0: First of Well, he's not the nominee. And, but, look. I look for it.
Speaker 3: Are you
Speaker 0: the pregnant ones? No. I'm not gonna lose.
Speaker 6: You both were members of Skull and Bones, a secret society in Yale. What does that tell us? Not much because it's a secret. Is there a secret Handshake, is there a secret code? I wish there were something secret I could manifest.
322, a secret number? There are all kinds of secrets then. But one thing is not A secret. I disagree with this president's direction.
Speaker 0: It is evident that the Bush family and others are under and have been under the control of the Jesuits for decades, most people are familiar with Hitler's book, Mein Kampf. However, it may surprise many that Hitler did not write the book.
Speaker 1: Adolf Hitler was not a writer. Adolf Hitler was A newspaper reading. According to Kurt Kruger's great book, I was Hitler's doctor, it It was published in 1934. He said that Hitler's lair was just filled with old newspapers, that that's all he ever did was read. Just Old newspapers.
He was not a writer. He was not a student of history. He was not a student of culture. If you read Mein Kampf, whoever wrote it Knew the cultures of many different countries over many different centuries. They knew all about political practices.
The writers of Mein Kampf were brilliant. And Mein Kampf, according to Leo Lehman, who was an Irish Roman Catholic priest Who wrote Behind the Dictators in 1942 said that father Bernard Stempel Was the real author of Mein Kampf.
Speaker 0: Adolf Hitler was created to be an instrument of the Jesuits. And like Napoleon, Hitler served his creator well. Millions of the Vatican's enemies were dead and America forgot George Washington's warnings and abandoned its policy of isolationism. During World War 2, the Vatican targeted the Orthodox Christians in Croatia for destruction. As in World War 1, the Orthodox Serbians of Croatia suffered again in World War 2.
A campaign of terror and murder was inflicted on the Serbs by the Croatian Ustase regime, the leader of the Ustase was Ante Pavelic, a Roman Catholic. Pavelic and the Ustase murdered around 500,000 people, while 250,000 were expelled and another 200,000 were forced to convert to Catholicism. Like the Jewish Holocaust, Pope Pius the 12th never condemned these atrocities nor has any pope since then condemned them. Once the war had concluded, the Vatican helped former Nazis escape Germany to save havens in South America. They even helped Ustase leader Pavelic escaped to Argentina.
Speaker 3: Pope Pius the 12 was the pope who saved hundreds of thousands of Yerkes Nazis who passed through Vatican monasteries, Dominican, Benedictine, and Jesuit, where they were given shelter, new identities, new passports, sent largely to South America, but there were plenty, sent elsewhere including to the United States, where there was even a program to get the good ones out of Operation Paperclip, which is well known, but Canada let in. And I I I know this. Mackenzie King let in tons of Nazis Who passed through the Vatican Monasteries, and this Pope Pius the 12th could it's impossible he didn't know about that.
Speaker 0: After World War 2, a conflict began between the western powers, mainly the US and Britain, and those of the east, the Soviets and the Chinese. It came to be called the cold war. From its beginning, the cold war was a way of keeping the world in chaos and fear pitting the Christian nations against the communist nations. And most importantly, a way to keep the spotlight off the Vatican, many people knew of Rome's backing of the Catholic dictators of Europe. They also knew of Rome's aid in helping many of them to escape.
The Vatican had not been punished for these crimes. In fact, pope Pius the 12th should have stood before the judges at. The Jesuits used the Cold War as an effective diversion for Rome. It worked like a charm. To get it started, a rock in the road had to be removed.
That rock was general George S Patton. At the end of World War 2, general George Patton wanted to attack the Soviet Union. Patton saw the menace to the free world communism was and wanted to go ahead and end it. Patton's conversation to general McNarney in nineteen forty five was revealing. Why do you care what these goddamn Russians think?
We are going to have to fight them sooner or later. Why not do it now while our army is intact and the damn Russians can have their hind end kicked back into Russia in 3 months. The Jesuits could not allow the Soviet Union to be destroyed. As Robert Wilcox lays out in his book, Target Patent, Roman Catholic William Donovan, head of the OSS, arranged for the assassination of Patton. Patton had survived 3 previous attempts on his life.
He also survived the 4th but was hospitalized. While in the hospital, a refined form of cyanide was given to him that can cause or appear to cause embolisms and heart failure. After making preparations to leave the hospital, Patton's health took a sudden turn for the worse and he died. The result was that the Jesuits got their cold war. During the cold war, the activity of 2 US presidents, John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan reveals much about the power of the Jesuits.
John Kennedy was a Roman Catholic who turned against the Vatican and the Jesuits, Kennedy decided to be his own man, take his own counsel and not take orders from Rome. He turned out to be a liberal Catholic which is just as obnoxious to the Vatican as a Protestant or any heretic. Kennedy began to pull out of Vietnam. He ordered the treasury department to print money and not go through the privately held Federal Reserve, and he had plans for a new invasion of Cuba.
Speaker 1: See, Kennedy wanted Cuba back from Castro. The big lie is that Kennedy, He was he canceled the orders. He didn't cancel the orders. McGeorge Bundy canceled the order for the air cover In the Bay of Pigs. That's according to Fletcher Prouty in his book, JFK.
And on the, On the USS Essex, which was a aircraft carrier there, the the captain was told not to give any air cover to the invading, patriots here in Cuba, But that cover was canceled not by JFK because the night before, he said he gave a go ahead. And to prove this point, there's a book that's been released about a year ago called Ultimate written by Waldron. And in that book, it shows that JFK had planned to invade Cuba On December 1, 1963, and get rid of that Jesuit Fidel Castro. On November 22nd, He was killed in the 90 days before the invasion was to take place.
Speaker 0: Like the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, John F Kennedy's assassination was meticulously planned and executed with Lee Harvey Oswald as the patsy.
Speaker 1: You see, Gene Hill with Mary Mormon were right there at the limousine. And Gene Hill and Mary Mormon Said that the driver turned around and shot, but they thought the driver was shooting back at the shooter. They didn't know the driver was shooting JFK in the head along with the storm drain shooter, a simultaneous headshot. That shot from the grassy knoll was a distraction. They had to smoke.
I mean, we've had smokeless gunpowder since the turn of the century. I mean, why would they use a rifle and have smoke? It It was a distraction for the crowd to run to the grassy knoll because the real shooters was the storm drain shooter And the driver shooting Kennedy in the head simultaneously. And I show him my book, Kennedy was shot 5 times.
Speaker 0: The assassination was done in a very public way to show other would be presidents what would happen if orders were not followed.
Speaker 1: The assassination of John F. Kennedy is done in broad daylight as a warning to all the other leaders of the world, But it's also done with this viciousness, because you see JFK was a Catholic, And they wanted to kill their Catholic boy who refused to uphold the temporal power of the pope. So they killed him viciously and cruelly. There's a warning to any other Catholic who would dare trample the temporary power of the pope.
Speaker 0: In contrast to Kennedy, Ronald Reagan did everything he could to court Vatican approval after an assassination attempt his life in 1981. Ronald Reagan
Speaker 1: was advocating some things That would have built a middle class. They were generally pretty good. He was talking like a conservative. Evidently, he thought for a few minutes he was the president because he'd been told to choose George Bush as the vice presidential candidate. And all the and all the conservatives said, how could you do this to us?
And yet he's still, quote unquote, elected. So Reagan starts to advocate some pretty good things, and so we're going to punish you, Ronnie. And so they carried out the attempted assassination. If he survives, He'll do what we're told, what he's told. If he doesn't survive, well, then George Bush will openly take his place and be the president.
Either way, we win. So Gerry Parr, the secret service agent, shoots Ryan Reagan inside the vehicle It makes it look like Hinkley is the one who shot him. Hinkley did not shoot Reagan. He was Reagan was untouched when at the time he was entering this the limousine. He was shot inside the limousine by a secret service agent.
And, then phenomenally enough, a a Jewish doctor saved his life. So, Bush was a part of this, of course. He, was not openly made the president, but he was secretly the president during the entire, two terms of.
Speaker 7: President Reagan has come to fulfill the greatest Moving in the history of this conspiracy because no other president has come as close as president Reagan was the Vatican and even, not even John f Kennedy. What that means is they have bound to president Kennedy and to president Reagan what they were not able to do even through a Roman Catholic president.
Speaker 0: In 1984, Reagan established diplomatic relations with the Vatican. Not since 18/67 had there been any official contact between the 2 countries.
Speaker 1: That relationship was formally restored by the worst President America has ever been disgraced with our greatest traitor, Ronald Reagan. When he restored diplomatic relationships with the Vatican, formally recognized the sovereign state of Vatican City as a nation, And now America can enter into a concordat with the Pope as warned by ex Jesuit Alberto Rivera for many
Speaker 0: ex Jesuit priest, Alberto Rivera, also revealed a secret concerning the inauguration of Ronald Reagan that some noted at the time, but few fully understood.
Speaker 4: Alberto Rivera made a startling statement in which he said there would be a sign given to Jesuits Throughout the world, when all churches would be taken over By the Jesuit order, the sign was to be when a president of the United States took his oath of office Facing an obelisk. For the first time in US history, the swearing in ceremonies were moved to the west front of the capitol, and President Reagan faced the Washington Monument.
Speaker 0: After Reagan's presidential reign, the Berlin Wall came down in 1989 and the cold war ended, however, instead of greater freedom, nations around the world found their governments becoming more repressive. Terrorism became the new foe and the United States and other Western governments pledged to fight this new enemy at all cost. That included taking away all God given rights from the people in order to bring about supposed peace and safety. In America and elsewhere, many noted that the government knew about the terrorist attacks in advance, but failed to stop them. In fact, it is now painfully obvious that the government allowed these attacks to occur.
Unfortunately, the American people find themselves in the same situation and making the same mistake that the southern people made before the war between the states. In the 1800, the south, like the north, had Jesuit controlled freemasons and in key religious, political and military positions. Many newspapers were also under Rome's control. These men and media outlets created the agitation towards war. As the slave issue escalated, pushing the South towards secession, the southern people fully expected God to be on their side.
However, like America today, the people of the South failed to understand they were not on God's side. The South did not practice biblically sanctioned slavery. The Bible authorizes 2 types of slavery, a voluntary servitude to pay off debt and slavery as a result of war. The South did not practice these types of slavery. The practiced man stealing or kidnapping for profit.
Exodus 21/16 clearly states, and he that stealeth a man and selleth him or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death. For their sin and refusal to repent of man stealing, the South reaped a harvest of death and destruction. Likewise, America today is finding itself in the same situation. Instead of asking God why he did not protect them from the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, Americans were easily manipulated with pride and cried out for vengeance against a foreign enemy. A vengeance that brought multibillion dollar profits to the death industries by promoting endless war.
Instead of asking god what they had done to offend him and lose their blessed state, the American people are seeking answers and solutions from politicians, false prophets, and economic wizards. For the most part, the American people do not see a correlation between turning their backs on the God of the Bible and the disasters that have come down upon them. At the beginning of 20th century, the Jesuits decided to implement their plans to create a central bank in the United States. Their plan would enable them to pay for the wars that were coming as the American empire expanded. Once this was accomplished, the common man would hold worthless paper and the Jesuits would be in a position to fund new wars using the US military as its muscle.
Speaker 1: The Jesuits in their counter reformation have set out to destroy the Protestant reformation, which had a middle class and private rights and private wealth And private land ownership, and in their attempt to bring the world back to the dark ages, the 13th century when Pope Clement Pope Innocent the third was the was the demon pope of all of Europe at the time, set out to destroy the Abigensis and others. To do this, to destroy Western protestant civilization, they had to implement the pillars of the communist manifesto. Well, 2 of those pillars are these, The national credit would be in the hands of the federal government. So therefore, the net the credit of this country It's in the federal government as extended to by the Federal Reserve Bank, which is a private bank. Lewis versus US tells us this In a federal case.
So this private Federal Reserve Bank, which is controlled by the Vatican, US various orders, Particularly, the old crusading orders like the knights of Malta and the knights templars which are today high level freemasons. They have put upon us this horrible Federal Reserve Bank, which is the Pope's bank to finance all the Pope's crusades Since no later than the Spanish American war of 18/98 to the present.
Speaker 0: In order to create the central bank, certain obstacles had to be overcome. 1st, those opposed to a central bank would need to be removed. And secondly, the law would need to be changed or simply appeared to be changed. To deal with the troublesome individuals who opposed a central bank, the Jesuits spared no expense. They built a ship of death called the Titanic.
The sinking
Speaker 1: of the Titanic was a design of the Jesuit order To get rid of, the opposition to the creation of a central bank in the United States.
Speaker 4: And the men on the Titanic were opposed to a central bank. They had to die. Among those were John Jacob Astor, Isidore Straus, Benjamin Guggenheim and a host of other millionaires Who were opposed to a central bank in America, therefore, they had to be taken out of the way. And they were on the Titanic.
Speaker 0: The company building the ship was owned by JP Morgan, who was himself an agent of the Rothschilds family. The Rothschilds being the bankers for the Pope and the Vatican. The main Jesuit targets were brought on board. The captain of the ship was Edward John Smith. It appears from his actions that captain Smith was a Jesuit coagitor.
That is, a Jesuit who has taken the oath, but does not wear the robes. A quagitore blends into the scenery and never looks like a Jesuit priest. It is a veteran sea captain, Edward Smith, who orders the ship to travel through an 80 square mile ice field at full speed on a moonless night. There had been over 8 telegrams warning the captain of the danger.
Speaker 4: He's warned 8 times, slow the ship down. Slow the Titanic down. You're going too fast. Not once stopped. Knew there was an ice, you know, iceberg field Up ahead knew that he should have slowed down but didn't.
And so you look and you say, How was it That this man could go headlong into a field of icebergs and not slow the ship down, not be more careful. The only way you can the only conclusion you can draw is, as a coagitor Of the Jesuit order, right through the line, the chain of command, he was told, Sink the ship. And he did. On board the Titanic, and this is all documented in a National Geographic video that was It's put out in 1986. You can go to your local library and they'll either have it on hand or they can, you know, get it on library loan.
But on that videotape, it shows that as the Titanic was coming up Along the coast of of England, it had various stops. And at one stop, a Jesuit priest got on board. His name was Francis Brown. Francis Brown got on board the Titanic, Took pictures of all of the wealthy people, took pictures of Edward Smith, the captain. And then, Just before the Titanic set sail across the Atlantic, Francis Brown got off.
And then, of course, the Titanic sunk.
Speaker 1: Well, Francis Brown is given a camera by his bishop, by his uncle, the bishop. And he is told to go down and take all these pictures of all these people we're gonna kill in 1st class. And so that's what he does. He takes picture of Of all these rich people, everybody that there's that there's gonna go down, and a rich passenger offers him Passage. Well, he knows the ship's gonna go down, but he he very sheepishly got in contact with his provincial.
And the provincial's message was, get off that ship.
Speaker 0: Like Brown, another noted passenger, Jesuit agent JP Morgan, did not make the ill fated sea voyage. Even though booked on the ship for passage to America, Morgan also fortuitously canceled at the last minute.
Speaker 1: Of course, JPMorgan, he had a He had his own suite reserved for him. And there were some 55 men who at the last minute canceled their reservations on the Titanic. JP Morgan was one of them. Said he was sick. Oh, by the way, don't load any of my art treasures on the Titanic either.
So he didn't have any of his art treasures on it either. Didn't lose any of that.
Speaker 0: How do we know there was foul play involved with the Titanic? When the iceberg was sighted, it was first officer Murdoch who attempted to port around the deadly object. This was sound enough, but Murdoch also ordered the engines into reverse. Author Win Wade asked the obvious question. As long as Murdoch was trying to veer out of the iceberg's way, why had he jammed on the brakes, so to speak, by throwing the engines full speed astern?
In point of fact, the 1910 edition of Knight's Modern Seamanship clearly contradicted Murdoch's decision. The instructions are clear. Avoid reversing the engines. Wade sums up the situation by saying, Murdoch had maneuvered in a manner more likely to cause collisions than to prevent them. As with many who investigated the Titanic disaster, author Win Wade was at a loss to explain Murdoch's actions in going against the book.
But the captain and Murdoch's actions were not the only telltale signs of treachery on the night the Titanic sank.
Speaker 1: And we see all sorts of anomalies in the Titanic. For example, when it was sinking, the emergency flares were to be red So that, ships in those lanes could see the Titanic was in trouble. Well, someone had taken away the red flares We replaced them with white flares, making it look like we were shooting off flares and having a party. And then the loading of the boats, we know that was a Fraud, they would not they didn't allow the lifeboats to be completely loaded. They were only half loaded.
Some 1 third loaded because the targets in the 1st class could not be allowed to board. And the Jesuits were not only the captain, but his officers. And there had been a strike in England at the time, And the men who were normally the ones who would man the ocean liners, they were replaced by Jesuit coadjutors ready to board because they were all under Oath to die for the black pope if necessary, and so they did carry out the sinking of the Titanic.
Speaker 0: But how is it possible that men will commit suicide as Captain Smith and some of his handpicked crew obviously did.
Speaker 1: We have to understand that these men have died to their own So of will. And so they have completely been emptied of their own personalities, and upon the order of their commander will do exactly what they're told. There's no such thing as a disobedient judgment. This serves as a warning to all the other men of power, not only in our country, but in England and Europe. You mess with us, and we're gonna do to you what we did to all those people on Titanic, and we're going to thwart the investigation Because a subsequent investigation of the sinking of Titanic blamed Bruce Ismay, the right hand man of JPMorgan, And and Captain Ward of England, they were the scapegoats when they could have easily blamed the men of power at that time, Saw who canceled their reservations, it was all in it was a Warren Commission all over again.
9/11 Commission all over again. It's a whitewash and cover up, and that cover up is even more powerful than the murderous son.
Speaker 0: After many of the leading opponents to a central bank had been removed, the Jesuits moved to obtain passage of the 16th amendment and the Federal Reserve Act, both in 1913.
Speaker 1: So they created the Federal Reserve Bank to finance their crusades. Without the Federal Reserve Bank, there's no war in Iraq. Without the Federal Reserve Bank, there's no World War 2. There's no World War 1. There's a book written by Katz called The Money Changers, and in it he says that it's the Federal Reserve Bank and the creators of all this paper currency, fiat money, credit out of thin air.
Without that, you don't have these wars. So they needed the Federal Reserve Bank To create wars on heretic and liberal peoples in Europe so that they could restore the pope's temporal power throughout the European nations That was being thrown off in the 1800.
Speaker 0: Besides instigating wars and controlling the banking industry, the Jesuits have spent a great deal of time and effort attacking and undermining their number one enemy, the Bible, specifically the King James Bible. As stated in Leonis, the secret plan, the Jesuits view the Bible as a serpent that must be made into a harmless rod. In an effort to undermine the validity of the Bible, especially the book of Genesis, the Jesuits promoted Charles Darwin's unproven theory of evolution. Evolution theory postulates that man evolved or came about by chance. There was no God or divine agent at work in creating the world.
All life had simply developed over time by mutations from a single cell that was formed billions of years ago, supposedly man himself had evolved from primitive ape like creatures to his present state. When the evolutionary theory needed proof of its validity, a young Jesuit priest by the name of Pierre Teilhard Deschardins appeared on the scene. In 1912 Teilhard assisted Charles Dawson at the digs in England where the Piltdown Man was discovered, this so called missing link convinced most of the world that mankind had evolved from more apelike creatures. It was not until 40 years later that the Piltdown Man was discovered to be a hoax. Philip Johnson in his book, Darwin on Trial, has this to say.
Many persons familiar with the evidence, including Stephen j Gold and Louis Leakey have concluded that Teilhard de Chardin was probably culpably involved in preparing the Piltdown fraud, by the time Piltdown man was exposed, a generation had been indoctrinated into the belief that the evolutionary theory had a solid foundation in science. The truth of the matter is that the evolutionary theory is questionable or bad science with no solid foundations in truth. To illustrate this fact, let's look at an exchange between author Luther Sunderland and doctor Colin Patterson. Luther Sunderland was a creationist author and exponent. In 1978, doctor Patterson, a senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History in London, published a book entitled evolution.
Sunderland wrote to doctor Patterson and asked why the preeminent evolutionist had not included any pictures of transitional fossils in his book, doctor Patterson candidly replied, I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustrations of evolutionary transitions in my book, if I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest that an artist should be used to visualize such transformations, but where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly, provide it. And if I were to leave it to artistic license, would that not mislead the reader? Like a bombshell, this statement by doctor Patterson hit the evolutionary world and enraged it.
Patterson sought to pacify his evolutionary colleagues, but he never recanted. To those who had a modicum of common sense it was evident that the evolutionary emperor was not wearing any clothes. Evolution was just a theory that had no hard evidence to back it up. In his 1996 book, Darwin's Black Box, doctor Michael Behey made this rather pointed observation. In the face of the enormous complexity that modern biochemistry has uncovered in the cell, the scientific community is paralyzed.
No one at Harvard University, the community is paralyzed. No one at Harvard University, no one at the National Institutes of Health, no member of the National Academy of Sciences, no Nobel Prize winner, no one at all can give a detailed account of how the cilium or vision or blood clotting or any complex biochemical process Zaz might have developed in a Darwinian fashion. But in spite of this and other overwhelming evidence that the evolutionary theory had no foundation in fact, the Vatican came out with an extraordinary statement. On October 22, 1996, the same year as Behe's book, Pope John Paul the second issued a statement to the Pontifical Academy in which he said, new knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more than hypothesis. This endorsement of evolution showed the true nature of the Vatican.
The God of the Bible had to be denied and relegated to the past. The Jesuit plan to cast doubt on the Bible as god's word of truth had come a long way. But Darwin's theory of evolution was not their greatest achievement in undermining biblical authority. The Jesuits set in motion an attack on the original Greek text of the bible, the new testament was written in Greek. For over 1900 years, the Greek text of the scriptures had endured and come down to us as it was read by the 1st Christians.
To be sure, we now only have copies of copies of the originals, but the text has remained the same. Today, there are 5,686 Greek New Testament manuscripts in existence. Of these manuscripts, the majority, over 90%, have been used over the centuries as a basis for the text of the New Testament. This majority text came out of Antioch in Syria. Antioch became the headquarters for Christians of the 1st century and the majority text is often referred to as the Antiochan text, but the authoritative line of manuscripts is more often called the textus receptus or received text.
The King James version is based on the received text. In the past, there have been attempts to alter the received text. A group of Gnostic Christians centered in Alexandria, Egypt altered some manuscripts in the 3rd century. The corrupted Alexandrian manuscripts downplayed the divinity of Jesus. The famous scholar Origen seems to have had a hand in this undertaking.
However, the Christians of that time were not fooled. In the 4th century, another attempt to pass on these same corrupted manuscripts was led by the Roman Catholic scholar, Jerome. Jerome made a translation of the bible using the corrupted Alexandrian texts in 3 80 AD. Jerome called his translation the Vulgate. Jerome's new translations was promoted by Rome and those who did not use it were persecuted.
It was not until the reformation that the uncorrupted received text was again used to translate God's word into the common language. The result was such translations as Luther's German New Testament of 15/22, Tyndale's English New Testament of 15/26, the Geneva Bible of 15/60, and the King James Bible of 16/11. Since 16/11, the King James Bible supplanted other English translations to become the most revered and cherished translations of Protestant Christians throughout the world. Then in the late 1800, 2 men worked to change that. These 2 biblical scholars were Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort, Westcott and Hort created a new critical text based on the theory that the New Testament was preserved almost perfectly in the 2 oldest manuscripts, the Sinaiticus and the Vaticanus.
The Sinaiticus manuscript was discovered in 18/44 in a Roman Catholic monastery. Facsimile copies of the Vaticanus manuscript were brought out of the Vatican library in the late 1800. Both of these manuscripts were from the corrupted Alexandrian line. Using these 2 manuscripts as a foundation, Westcott and Hort began to put together their Greek text of the new testament in 18/50 three, in 18/81, they completed and published their work. According to Westcott and Hort, now for the first time, the true text of the new testament was available to believers.
Significantly, it is from the Westcott and Hort Greek text that many modern Bible translations have been produced. And what has been the effect of this change to those in the pews listening to the word of God. With regard to John 118, we read in the King James version, no man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten son, which is in the bosom of the father he hath declared him. The same verse in the New International Version based on the Westcott text reads, no one has ever seen God, but God, the one and only, who is at the father's side, has made him known. Despite the somewhat confused rendering in the NIV, the change really amounts to altering only begotten son to only begotten God.
The appearance of this alteration in a small body of text originating from the veritable capital of Gnosticism, Alexandria, would suggest that the gnostics made their mark in these texts and at this verse. Gnostics saw matter as evil and spirit as good. God was spirit and could not be involved with wicked matter or flesh, especially in the conception of the child. To Gnostics, the virgin birth was an impossibility. Another example of the corrupt influence of the Alexandrian manuscript was found in Acts 230.
King David is spoken of in this verse as being a prophet and knowing that god has sworn with an oath to him that of the fruit of his loins according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne. The same verse in the New International Version based on the Westcott Hort text reads, but he was a prophet and knew that God had promised him on oath that he would place one of his descendants on his throne. This is a clear cut example of the removal of local statement concerning the literal incarnation and physical descendants of Jesus Christ from David. This is in line with many gnostic systems, which viewed Christ as a purely spiritual being, an Aeon emanating from the everlasting. The reading presented in the traditional text where Christ in the flesh is said to be in physical descendants from David, would be antithetical to these speculative systems.
There are many other examples that can be used to illustrate the point that the Westcott and Hort Greek texts holds contrary views to the doctrines and teachings of the majority of the existing Greek manuscripts. Unfortunately, most Christians today are ignorant of this and still rely on the corrupt Westcott and Hort Greek text. Since they have had such an impact on the biblical text from which many modern translations come, it might be helpful to know more about Westcott and Hort. Supposedly, these men were protestants. Specifically, they were Anglican or Church of England scholars.
Moreover, unlike what one would expect from a believer in the truth of the word of God, Westcott did not believe that the first 3 chapters of Genesis should be taken literally. In a letter to Hort, Westcott stated, no one now I suppose holds that the first 3 chapters of Genesis, for example, give a literal history. I could never understand how anyone reading them with open eyes could think they did. Westcott also doubted the miracle stories in the bible. He stated, I never read an account of a miracle, but I seem instinctively to feel its improbability.
But even more telling is Westcott's devotion to John Henry Newman. Newman along with several other Church of England clergymen began the Oxford movement in 18/33. The purpose of the secret movement was to reunite the Church of England with the Roman Catholic church. That same year, a clandestine meeting was held in Rome between John Henry Newman, Richard Frode, and Monsignor Wiseman. When asked what it would take for the church of England to be accepted back into the Roman Catholic church, Monsignor Wiseman answered, the church of England must accept the council of Trent in its entirety.
Consider that, in 18/33, the spokesman for the papacy brings up the acceptance of the council of Trent as the main condition for reuniting with Rome. The council of Trent met and declared one 125 anathemas against the Protestant reformation. The Pope and the Jesuits had not changed their minds then or to this day. For 12 years, Newman and his colleagues worked secretly to push the Church of England back into the arms of the papacy. When this secret society and his intentions were discovered, Newman and a 150 followers defected to the Roman church.
It is apparent that Westcott was one of Newman's disciples who did not defect, but rather remained as a tool of Rome. Westcott's scholastic partner and pupil, Fenton John Anthony Hort was no better in his biblical faith. Although, Hort doubted the existence of a literal devil an of eternal punishment for the godless. He did believe in the Roman Catholic concept of purgatory. Hort stated that the idea of purgation, of cleansing as by fire seems to me inseparable from what the Bible teaches us of the divine chastisements.
Hort also adhered to the Roman Catholic teaching of baptismal regeneration. Hort stated, we maintain baptismal regeneration as the most important of doctrines. The pure view seems to me nearer and more likely to lead to the truth than the evangelical. These false teachers worked ceaselessly to undermine the King James Version of the Bible and install new Bible versions more acceptable to the Vatican, Bible versions like the Revised Standard Version, the American Standard Version, the Living Bible, and the new international version of the Bible. As mentioned earlier, the NIV is based on the Westcott Hort Greek text and its successor the Nestle Alain Greek text, a Jesuit translator Carlo Martini was on the translation committee for the NIV.
For this supposedly protestant translation of the bible, a representative of a group sworn to destroy protestants sat on the committee that created a Protestant Bible. So is this really a Protestant Bible? Once doubt had sufficiently been cast on the Bible and its veracity, the Jesuits knew the public would be less inclined to rise up in revolt as more open and drastic measures were taken to suppress the true word of God. In the 1962 Engel versus Vitale case, the US Supreme Court voted that prayer in public school was unconstitutional. Why?
Because it violated the first amendment. Prayer in school had not violated the first amendment for a 175 years, but suddenly it did. The following year in the case of Abington versus Shep, the Supreme Court voted that the reading of the Bible was also a violation of the first amendment. How did the Supreme Court arrive at these decisions? One only has to know that the chief justice of the court, Earl Warren, was a Freemason to see why the court voted as it did.
And why did the president and congress not impeach these supreme court justices and remove them from the court? The answer is simple. The president and congress agreed with the decision. Otherwise, these godless justices would have been impeached and removed. How did this happen?
First in the 19 fifties, churches began to incorporate and organize as tax exempt organizations. Churches had always been tax exempt but now they could offer their congregations tax deductions for tithes an offerings. It was senator Lyndon Baines Johnson who pushed for the churches to be added to the section five zero one c three of the tax code. For a five zero one c 3 church to openly speak out or organize in opposition to anything that the government declares legal even if it is completely immoral, the church will jeopardize its tax exempt status. The five zero one c three has had a chilling effect upon the free speech rights of the church.
Another reason for the demise of the protestant churches in America was that church pulpits and leadership had been infiltrated and subverted by free masons and Jesuit coagitors, it was at this time, the late fifties and early sixties that the 2nd Vatican Council met and set new goals for achieving old purposes.
Speaker 4: Vatican 2 fits right in harmony with the Council of Trent, because what you have is at Trent, The Catholic church said, We will not compromise with Protestantism. And so between Trent In the 15 forties and Vatican 2 from 1958 to 1963, you have Jesuit infiltration of all the churches. So that finally by 1958 to 1963, There's been enough enough infiltration done, and enough of the messages of those churches have been watered down. So now Rome comes in with the ecumenical movement. That's what John the 23rd did at Vatican 2.
It was, let's bring all the churches together now, but it's not under protestantism. It's not under biblical truth and principle. It's under Rome, and it's under Roman tradition and Roman authority. That's all Vatican 2 was. So Vatican 2 fits right in harmony with, Alberto Rivera And his statement that all the churches by 1981 were completely taken over.
Speaker 0: What is the ultimate goal of the papacy? What is it that has not changed since the meetings in Vienna, Verona, and Sherry in the early 1800? The answer is domination of the world. The Vatican is seeking to create a one world government or new world order. A newspaper, La Stampa, carried a curious article that said the Vatican had gained control of a portion of the temple mount in Jerusalem.
Speaker 3: They want their capital back. The Crusades haven't ended. They've they've done this before. It's not a new phenomenon here. What the Vatican wants is Rome is the 2nd capital.
They want a crusade to liberate what they view as their Actual physical capital, and that's where they don't want Jews in Jerusalem.
Speaker 2: What they were trying to do with this word out is take an eraser to all of these countries. Right? Now you have no more countries, one massive trading block. Right? In the middle of this, you've got a city that is revered big time.
The papacy has wanted to move from Rome To Jerusalem, ever since the fur very 1st crusade, they still wanna do that.
Speaker 3: And how do we know this? We know this because, a person named, Mark Halter, the French intellectual friend of Chimon Peres, gave an interview in an out of funk magazine, Israeli magazine, Chi Chi, where he said in May of 1990 I delivered a letter to the Pope.
Speaker 0: He went to Paris,
Speaker 3: promising the Vatican, East Jerusalem And, he gave a few details. East Jerusalem would be policed by the UN. The Vatican would get to 12 all the holy sites of all religions. And, the PLO would get a a state within this end state. The Vatican, gets the holy sites, and the UN gets to place the place.
And now we've got 2 magazine confirmations, And Arafat agreed to this. According to the staff, 3 days before the signing of the declaration of principles, Arafat agreed to the deal. And then when he didn't get the deal, the terrorists started, in earnest.
Speaker 0: If you do not bow down to the Jesuit controlled Roman Catholic leader, you are a heretic and you must die. These are the words of the celebrated saint Thomas Aquinas. On the part of the church, however, there is mercy which looks to the conversion of the wanderer. Wherefore, she condemns not at once, but after the 1st and 2nd admonition as the apostle directs. After that, if he is yet stubborn, the church no longer hoping for his conversion looks to the salvation of others by excommunicating him and separating him from the church, and furthermore delivers him to the secular tribunal to be exterminated thereby from the world by death.
During the trial, Abraham Lincoln put Bishop Foley on the stand. The bishop was forced to admit that Saint Thomas was looked upon as one of the highest authorities. In fact, the Roman Catholic bishops swore that God himself had inspired what Saint Thomas had written about the manner in which heretics should be treated by the Roman Catholics. If the Vatican has its way, the future for all who speak out against the pope or who do not go along with the goals of the Jesuits, is one of torture and death. This has been the fate of many world leaders, including presidents in the United States.
It has also been the fate of others in all walks of life, like Confederate General Stonewall Jackson, those against the Central Bank on the Titanic, ex Jesuit Alberto Rivera. In the Jesuit oath, the Jesuits states, I will when opportunity presents make and wage relentless war secretly or openly against all heretics, protestants, and liberals as I am directed to do to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth. In light of all that has been exposed in this documentary, what is to be done? 1st and foremost, Christians should seek the Lord's guidance through daily prayer and bible study. We should pray for a new reformation.
Not a false revival, nor one that piggybacks on a political movement, or even one that tries to take control of the existing antichrist Republican and Democrat parties. But rather a reformation that emphasizes the God of the Bible. A Bible based on the textus Receptus like the King James version. Secondly, the Bible tells Christians to separate ourselves from evil. Be ye not an equally yoked together with unbelievers.
And in the same chapter verse 17, wherefore come out from among them and be ye separate say of the lord we should seek for a peaceful separation or secession from the American empire.
Speaker 1: We wanna go back to a typical constitutional protestant form of government It was isolationist. We kept our noses out of the businesses of other nations, and we sought to develop our own country. George Bush has called the United States constitution a GD piece of paper, and he's called this present war a crusade, which it is. So it's all the more reason to secede. We're never gonna get any relief.
We need to have a move in every state For secession, where we can begin to withdraw from roaming the Potomac, which is Washington, and we can reestablish state national government once again, And begin to govern our own affairs for what's best for that population or those populations in those states. And if we wish, we can then confederate together with other states, but we don't have to.
Speaker 0: Christians should not only avoid the poisons of this world, but also the false churches in the land. We should attend bible believing churches that are not incorporated and thus controlled by the government. If you cannot find a bible believing congregation in your area, start a house church yourself with your family or with other people in your community. Christians should shine light on the evil we see and speak out against it. In Ephesians we read, and have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.
Do not be timid, but speak out about what is clearly unbiblical and evil in this country. And finally, be aware of deceivers and deceptions. Jesus warned of false prophets with lying tongues. In Matthew 24 verse 11, we read. And many false prophets shall rise and shall deceive many.
In 1 Timothy, the apostle Paul wrote, now the spirit speaketh expressly that in the latter times, some shall depart from the faith, world. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry.
I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry.
I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm Christ. We should be vigilant and hold steadfast to the true faith as found in the scriptures leaning on the Holy Spirit to empower us against false doctrine and wicked men. God's word does not tell us to make war on other countries to bring them democracy or to do nation building, these lies need to be denounced.
The Jesuits will not stop in their quest for world dominion and the setting up of a new world order. Christians are to resist this antichrist system and be the light of the world. As the light shines, it reveals the truth. And the dark creatures of this world retreat from it.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU BELIEVE THE JESUITS ARE EVIL? https://t.co/Z1rBImeB0U
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the historical influence of the Jesuits and the Vatican, highlighting their involvement in various events such as assassinations, wars, and financial manipulations. It suggests that the Jesuits have been working towards consolidating power and creating a global empire under the control of the papacy. The Vatican's aim is to establish a one-world government with Jerusalem as its capital, not Rome. The video concludes by urging Christians to pray, study the Bible, and resist the Jesuit agenda for world dominion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In June of 1864, the war between the states was entering its final year, and one of the main thoughts that occupied president Abraham Lincoln's mind was the part played by Rome in the war. Lincoln said repeatedly, this war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits. We owe it to popery that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her noblest sons. This seems to be a strange statement by president Lincoln, considering what is taught today about the war between the states. Nothing is ever mentioned of a religious element in the war, or that the pope and the Jesuit order were intimately involved.
But Lincoln was not the only voice raised in opposition to the pope's meddling in the affairs of this country at that time. Samuel Morse, the inventor of Morse code, traveled to Europe and Rome in 18/30 to do his own investigation into the conspiracies hatched against America. After returning home to the United States, Morse wrote 2 books warning Americans of the threat from Rome. Morse would continue sounding the alarm throughout the 1800 and went to discuss the situation with Lincoln after his inauguration.
Speaker 1: Samuel Morse, of course, is the inventor of Morse code that was used for many, many years. And Samuel Morse wrote a book called Foreign Conspiracies Against the Liberties of the United States. It was published in 18/35. And he shows in that book that the Holy Alliance, the Leupold Foundation out of Austria, controlled by the Jesuits, And the Jesuits themselves were the agents to overthrow the liberties of the United States, the Federal Republic of the United States, and to replace it with a papal centralized government as the Vatican is run.
Speaker 0: But today, one looks around us to see US presidents and congressmen and women groveling before the pope. Lincoln's words would seem ironic. Consider this also. In April 2008, the president of the United States, George w Bush, rushed out to meet the pope at his plane. Does this not seem to be odd behavior?
For the first time in history, a US president went out to meet a religious leader, or for that matter, any leader, upon his entry into the US.
Speaker 2: No president in the entire history of the United States has ever greeted a foreign diplomat like that ever. They wait until they're brought into Washington or something. They don't go out on the tarmac. This is a first.
Speaker 0: What makes this even more egregious is that the current pope is a former head of the office of inquisition and a former member of the Nazi party in his youth.
Speaker 3: You know that cardinal Ratzinger was the grand inquisitor of the Vatican before he became pope Benedict. You're aware of that. I assume other people are not aware of that. For a Jew, the inquisition has such awful, awful memories and we are inviting the head of the inquisition to the Jewish states. I gave a lecture yesterday and these are the points that I brought up.
You don't invite the grand inquisitor to Israel. It's that simple.
Speaker 0: How did we go from a nation on the alert against the pope and the Jesuits' desire to bring America down to one of accepting them as friends? Simply put, we have sold out. It has not gone unnoticed that several Protestant presidents have attended mass and taken communion at Catholic churches. Since one cannot take communion at a Roman Catholic service if one is not Catholic, several presidents have misled their supporters into thinking they are Protestant when they are not. Furthermore, those in power are often Roman Catholics outright, so it is expected that they will obey orders from the Pope.
From US presidents to kings and queens, to religious leaders throughout the world, those in power meet the pope and bow down to him. Even when President Obama went to the Vatican in July 2009 to discuss the world economic situation, he too bowed to the pope. Upon leaving, president Obama said, we look forward to a very strong relationship between our two countries. It is important to remember these words of president Obama and what they mean. The pope is not just a spiritual ruler, he is a territorial ruler.
The name of his country since 1929 is Vatican City.
Speaker 4: The Pope is a monarchy. Actually, according to various books, the pope is the monarch of the world. Not just a religious leader, he is actually a political leader. The Vatican is actually a small area over in Rome whereby the Pope is the ruler of that small area. The actual name, Vatican, I found very interesting.
It actually means, worship of the divine serpent. So we find that the very basis of the Vatican, the very word itself means the worship of serpents.
Speaker 0: But from Rome's perspective, the Pope rules over more than Vatican City. He rules over the Earth both spiritually and materially or temporally. According to the Roman Catholic teaching, the pope can keep you out of heaven, and he has absolute authority over you on earth.
Speaker 1: And when I speak of the pope, I speak of the papacy, that the papacy claims its 2 powers. Its first power is universal spiritual power over all individuals, that every person must be subject to the spiritual power of the Pope, that there is no salvation outside of the Catholic church, which is the doctrine of the Council of Trent is reaffirmed in the documents of Vatican 2 of the 19 sixties. It's still on the books of canon law and the other power of the Pope, which is the second key, as you see the two keys, in the Pope's flag with the triple crown, lord of heaven, lord of earth, lord of hell, and the 2 keys, spiritual power. The second key is the temple power. The temple power is this, that the pope believes he has the right to rule the government, the civil government of every nation.
That temporal power has never been denied. It's never been disclaimed.
Speaker 4: But there is no question that the Pope wields both swords, both a spiritual sword that the public sees, as well as a political sword which most people do not see.
Speaker 0: So it is very interesting and unsettling to those who love freedom and the right to worship God as one sees fit, to see our leaders submitting to the pope of Rome. Now, let us revisit Lincoln's words. We have discussed the Pope's and the papacy, but what about the other group Lincoln mentioned? He spoke of the sinister influence of the Jesuits. Who are the Jesuits?
Speaker 4: Jesuits are a group of people that were raised up, right around 1535, 1540. Their leader was Ignatius Loyola. They basically had two purposes. One purpose was to destroy the Protestant Reformation, Because, as you remember, Martin Luther had appeared at the Diet of Worms in 15/21, stood before Charles the 5th and the Holy Roman Empire. And so the Catholic church sought to stop the Protestant Reformation that Luther began, and they couldn't do it.
And so about 20 years after Luther stood at the Diet of Worms, the Jesuit Order was created, and one of their purposes was to destroy every vestige of the Protestant Reformation, both in the religious realm, in the political realm, and in the economic realm. Because the Protestant Reformation not only affected the religious arena, it also affected the political and the economic arenas as well. That was one goal of the Jesuit Order. The other aspect was to restore the supremacy and dominance of the pope throughout the world.
Speaker 0: The Jesuit order has directed popes concerning policy, both foreign and domestic, since 15 40, in particular, since the council of Trent.
Speaker 4: The council of Trent, indeed, it was a it started in 15 45. It went for the next 18 years. That doesn't mean that they stayed there for 18 years. They met in different places. But over that period of time, the various leaders of the Catholic Church and the newly formed Jesuit Order would come together from time to time and discuss how the Catholic Church would respond to the teachings of the Protestant Reformation.
Would they accept them or would they completely reject them?
Speaker 1: So the doctrines that were being championed at the reformations, the doctrines of grace, justification by grace through faith, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura, only the scriptures, scriptures, by grace alone through faith alone, etcetera, etcetera. No baptismal regeneration, that there is only salvation in Christ, that we do not participate in our salvation. It's not a joint effort of man and god, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. All the doctrines championed by the reformers were absolutely accursed and condemned and reprobated by the Council of Trent that the Jesuits really oversaw from 1545 to 15/63. It was an 18 year council in the town of Trent, Italy, and that is the foundation of what we call the Counter Reformation.
Speaker 4: And the Council of Trent laid out the the focal point, the direction that the Catholic church would go for the next 4 centuries. Basically, at the Council of Trent, they decided that tradition and what the church fathers of the Catholic church taught would continue to be the sole authority in the Catholic church. Now, of course, there's other aspects of that, other teachings that branch off from that, but that is the basic sum of the Council of Trent, that tradition would still rule the Catholic Church. The anathemas that they have come out with that came from the Council of Trent to destroy heretics, to destroy those who would uphold the word of God, those still live today?
Speaker 1: That's correct. The papacy has not rescinded any of the curses set forth in the Council of Trent. In fact, the Council of Trent ends and says, accursed be all heretics. Accursed. Accursed.
Every poll passed to swear to uphold the Council of Trent. And if you read the documents of Vatican 2, put together by Abbott, it shows you right there that every pope must swear to uphold the Council of Trent. Even though in the sixties, when they were calling heritage separated brethren, with that delusion and illusion, they still did uphold the council of Trent as well as all the former papal bulls condemning heretics and calling for kings to kill them out of their dominions like the diadocals of Pius the 4th.
Speaker 0: The head of the Jesuits is the superior general of the order. He is called the black pope.
Speaker 4: The head of the Jesuit order is the black pope. The man who is currently there, he was just recently elected Nicholas Adolphus. The black pope is the head of the Jesuit order. He is called the black pope not because he is of African origin, but because he is in the dark. We see the white pope.
We see pope Benedict the 16th because he's visible and all the world knows who he is. But the black pope remains in the dark behind the scenes, and so few people know he even exists. But that's why he's called the black pope, and he's the one who heads the Jesuit order.
Speaker 0: There is an ongoing war against anyone who resists the power of the pope, And this war is directed by the Jesuits. This war is not waged openly by the Jesuits. The society of Jesus moves in the shadows. They infiltrate and get others to do the dirty work of assassination. If armed conflict is needed, they use the army of 1 nation to bring a disobedient nation to its knees.
Speaker 4: The Jesuits would do that very thing. They were very intelligent. They're still very intelligent people. What they would do is they would infiltrate. They did it through economics, through the merchants.
They would then come in, start teaching. They're they were very wise people. They would then infiltrate not only into schools, but they then would infiltrate into local government and then rise up to higher government officials. We find that repeatedly in the book by Avril Manhattan called Vietnam, Why Did We Go, where he talks about how they followed this exact plan throughout Southeast Asia. They did it in Japan.
They did it in China. They did it in Korea. They did it in Vietnam. They did it all along the Pacific Rim. Well, eventually, what would happen, you would have created Catholic cities where all the people in towns would become Catholics.
Well, they would then try to put their Catholic ideals onto the major religious populace of a country. In the Far East, of course, the major religious populace would be the Buddhists. So these Catholics in this country, these converts to Catholicism, they would try to push their Catholicism on their Buddhist friends. And when the Buddhist friends rejected it, the Catholics would start to use force. Well, then the Buddhists would appeal to the local governments, the state governments, the national governments, and then there would be revolution.
It got so bad in Japan that in 16/39, the the Japanese emperor, he said, no more Catholics, no more Europeans will come to our island again. And that band stayed there for almost 2 centuries. This happened throughout the Far East and in other countries throughout the world.
Speaker 0: Why has this assault on the non Catholic world been ignored by most people, especially Protestant ministers?
Speaker 4: Billy Graham is not he didn't protest door towards the latter part of his life. For the first part, I think he was solid when he first started. But along around the early sixties, his voice was silenced. Robert Schuller, Paul Crouch, Hal Lindsey, Pat Robertson, James Dobson. All of these men, they're not protesting.
What they have become is are agents agents of Rome. I remember back when I was starting my student teaching, I was teaching 7th grade history to young people talking about the pilgrims and Puritans coming over to America. The book said absolutely nothing about why they were coming to America. And I was just reading, and I've got a book here called the, Rothschild, money trust, and also a book about the Rockefellers, the Rockefeller File by Gary Allen. But these people have set up trusts, and they have rewritten the history books.
They have rewritten the history books, so that the 7th grade history book that I was teaching out of said nothing about the reformations.
Speaker 1: We have to remember that the papacy, specifically the black pope, controls all high level freemasonry. That includes temple there in Washington DC. The especially the temple there in Washington DC. That includes all of your big evangelists. For example, Billy Graham is the 33rd degree freemason.
And I know that Billy Graham organization denies that, but it's still the truth because we know according to the honest 33rd degree freemason who was truly converted to Christ, we believe the gospel, who was saved by the grace of god. His name was Jim Shaw. And when he was inducted into the order of the 33rd degree in Washington DC, he said there were 2, former presidents there on that, in that council. And, one of them was Gerald Ford, a 33rd degree freemason in pardon Nixon, and the other was Jimmy Carter, 33rd degree freemason. So there they are at the grand council.
Another one was an international evangelist, which he later said told, others that it was Billy Graham because the publisher refused to put Billy Graham's name in there. So Billy Graham was there. So Billy Graham is nothing more than the high level masonic shill for the papacy, which is also a fraud with Freemasons if you read the book In God's Name by by David Yellop. And so we talk about Robert Schuller, for example. Robert Schuller is another 33rd degree Freemason.
He went to Rome to get the pope's blessing to build his crystal cathedral. And Robert Schuller is a personal friend of that of the anti white, hateful racist, Louis Farrakhan, who is another high level freemason who runs the Nation of Islam for the archbishop of Chicago. So we have all these high level masonic leaders, black and white, of all these various different religions working together for agitation among the peoples of this country, but never ever exposing the papacy as the true heart and soul and their its real master.
Speaker 0: All of this sounds incredible. It becomes less so when one examines the oath of the Jesuits.
Speaker 1: We have to understand that these men have died to their own self will. It's something a Christian should do. It's the way we should be. We have no life anymore. Our life is we're dead with Christ, and we're hidden God with him.
When Christ is revealed, who is our life, then we shall be revealed within the glory. We need to learn to die to ourselves and count our lives as nothing. That our only purpose is to do the will of our master. And when he's finished with that with us, then let us die. The Jesuits have done this, but they do it for the devil.
And so they have completely been emptied of their own personalities, and upon the order of their commander will do exactly what they're told. There's no such thing as a disobedient jesus. They're all under orders. They've been trained for 15 years. They're soldiers.
They're more of a marine corps than the marines. The marines were fashioned after the Jesuit order. You break the man down in boot camp, you rob him of his personality, you shave his head, you put everything all the same clothes on him, they're all treated the same, they're treated like dirt, we're gonna rob you of your will so that we can mold you into what we want you. That's all Jesuit. So this is how they think.
In a given order, they will kill you, me, themselves, their mother. Anything they're ordered to do, that is what they will do. We're gonna bring down 911 today, gentlemen. Okay. Give me the order, what we do, what button we push.
Do I need to be inside, outside? What is it? And that's what they'll do. We need to bring down the Pentagon today. We need to blow up the Arizona in in Pearl Harbor in 1941.
Okay? I'll be there. Where's my orders? They're all under orders. And this is why you can have no country with a Jesuit presence in it.
They have to be expelled, and all their agents that they work through must be expelled. And this is exactly what czar Alexander the first did in 18/20. He kicked out all the Jesuits out of Russia. In 18/22, he shut down all the masonic lodges. And in 18/25, he was poisoned.
So this is the Jesuit mindset, and we have to we should read the spiritual exercises. We should read some of their works. We need to read the Jesuit doctrines of regicide. How it's no murder to kill a heretic. How it's okay to lie, cheat, and steal.
How it's okay to kill your enemy. How it's okay to kill a woman that you commit adultery with. If she should wanna tell her, I mean, you can kill her. It's all right there in the canon law. It's okay to steal.
The whole world is their candy shop where they can steal everything they can get their hands on to consolidate it under the power of the Jesuit order. And if that means killing kings or sinking ships, even if it causes their own death, they do it for the greater glory of god. Admigeria de Gloria.
Speaker 0: When a Jesuit priest is elevated to a position of high command, he has administered what is called the Jesuit extreme oath of induction. This oath has been called the 4th vow or the blood oath given to those in the society of Jesus besides the traditional vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience. A copy of the extreme oath can be found in the congressional record.
Speaker 4: I wanna read a statement to you, which is the Jesuit oath. It says, this is the Jesuit oath. I do further promise and declare that I will have no opinion or will of my own, that's from the spiritual exercises of Loyola, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver, but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the pope. I furthermore promise and declare that I will make and wage relentless war as I am directed to do to extirpate and exterminate protestants and liberals from the face of the whole earth, I will neither spare aid, sex, or condition. I will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women, and crush their infants' heads against the wall in order to annihilate forever their exocrupled race.
And then it goes on. The point being, throughout the history of the Jesuit order, they will shoot, they will burn, they will play, they will do whatever it takes to destroy anybody who stands in the way of what they want to do.
Speaker 0: In 2009, the Jesuit general was confronted about the oath.
Speaker 5: One of the things in your in your Jesuit high oath, I think it is it says something about furthermore, you promised to declare that we'll, at the first opportunity, seek war at any opportunity against heretics, Protestants, liberals.
Speaker 1: You by what is that?
Speaker 5: See here? And that that, will spear neither age nor sex nor condition, and I will hang, waste, boil, flayze. You've never seen this before?
Speaker 1: No. I haven't seen it.
Speaker 5: Strangled, very alive, and it's horrible.
Speaker 1: And I
Speaker 5: was like, look, let me get Even in the congressional record.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Thank you for coming. Does the oath and activities of the Jesuit reflect anything Christian? Or is it as Jesus said, beware of false prophets which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly, they are ravening wolves. What else do we know about the Jesuits?
They've been thrown out of 83 countries over the last 500 years. That is correct. 83 countries have physically removed them. And why was it necessary to remove them? In a word, power.
The Jesuits have throughout history sought to take over and control every country in which they reside. Since their beginning in 15 40, the Jesuits power grew until they controlled the papacy, the Roman Catholic church, and many of the governments of the world. In 17/73, all of that changed. 1 by 1, countries began to expel the Jesuits from their borders. This culminated in the suppression or abolishment of the Jesuits in 17/73.
In that year, Pope Clement the 14th officially disbanded the order forever. This providential act enabled a nation based on religious liberty to be formed, the United States of America. At the same time in history as the Jesuits were suppressed, the American Revolution occurred. Many believe this was no accident, but an act of God.
Speaker 1: I see the suppression of the Jesuits as providential because without the suppression of the Jesuit order, there is no successful American Revolution, period. We have to understand that the Protestants and the Baptists of Europe had been persecuted in excess of 200 years, crying out to the lord for some place to live where they could worship him and seek his face and be obedient to his word. But nothing else was more important to them than that. And so as a result, the lord answered their prayers and opened up North America to them in the 1600, but ultimately to get a government that would protect them in their rights. Freedom of worship, freedom of press, freedom of conscience, freedom of self defense, and what came to be the American Bill of Rights and then, of course, the US Constitution.
So without the suppression of the Jesuit order, there is no, escape for us out of Europe into North America to start a free nation where we can worship God according to the dictates of our conscience.
Speaker 4: As the Americans were determining and setting up a constitution where protestant principles would reign, where freedom of religion would reign, where people would have the right to bear arms, where people would have a right to a fair trial, where all of these principles are being laid down, the Jesuit order is abolished. If the Jesuit order had not been abolished in 17/73, And as they watched a Protestant country rising up in the western hemisphere, the Jesuit order would have used not only England, who they did use in the American Revolution, they would have used France, they would have used Spain, they would have used Portugal because those were all Catholic countries. They would have used all those countries to destroy this growing Protestant nation, and it would never have been established.
Speaker 0: Having had their power and influence greatly diminished, the Jesuits were unable to stop the American colonies from establishing a Protestant Republic. That is to say the Jesuits were in no condition to coordinate a crusade against the new Protestant Republic as they had done with England in 1588 by using the Spanish Armada. But the Jesuits had won ace in the hole. Many of the founding fathers were Deists and Freemasons. They attended church services and publicly paid homage to the God of the Bible, but in reality, they did not believe in miracles or the divinity of Jesus Christ.
Their God was the great architect of the universe, not the God of the Bible. Thomas Jefferson went so far as to create his own Bible by cutting out verses he agreed with and pasting them into a blank book. The verses Jefferson believed in were those where Jesus speaks of morality and loving others. Miracles such as the virgin birth or Jesus's resurrection were omitted since they were considered fables. Freemasons like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine had little regard for the divine miracle working Jesus of the Bible.
Thomas Paine, author of the famous pamphlet Common Sense, wrote a book called The Age of Reason. In it, Paine says, Jesus Christ wrote no account of himself. The history of him is altogether the work of other people. And as to the account given of his resurrection and ascension, it was the necessary counterpart to the story of his birth. His historians having brought him into the world in a supernatural manner were obliged to take him out again in the same manner.
Thus, when it came time to create a document that would unite these colonies into one country, The Jesuits had an idea many preferred. It was called religious liberty. The first amendment to the constitution would allow all religions to exist in America, not just religions based on the Protestant Bible. In the new American Republic, Roman Catholicism was allowed to coexist with the Protestant denominations as well as the deistic freemasons. But most importantly, the Roman Catholics were allowed to vote just like any other citizens.
This was key as we shall see later on. For has their numbers increased, Roman Catholics could put in power other Roman Catholics or those who were sympathetic to them and changed the nation from within.
Speaker 1: After the, revolutionary war, voting rights of Catholics did change. We know that one of the signers of the constitution was a Roman Catholic. There was only 1, mister Carroll. But nonetheless, it made it look like a place for Roman Catholics to come, as well as Protestants to have religious liberty, which is absurd. The Roman Catholic people had been used by the priest to kill us for centuries, and so why not stay in Europe?
Well, they were being used by the Jesuits to come here to ultimately then take over political power and then submit North America to the feet of the pope.
Speaker 0: Turning from the happenings with the American colonies, us take a moment to investigate what the Jesuits were up to in Europe after their suppression. As we might guess, the Jesuits were not idle. They decided to seek revenge against those who had turned on them, specifically a traitorous Pope and the Catholic Monarchs of Europe. In 17/74, a year after the Jesuits were disbanded forever
Speaker 2: Pope Clement the 14th had suppressed the Jesuits. And, a short time later, he was poisoned. Poison is a big thing with these guys.
Speaker 0: Pope Clement stated, alas, I knew they would poison me, but I did not expect to die in so slow and cruel a manner. A postmortem examination of his body revealed the presence of a poison. Thus, the Jesuits rid themselves of a troublesome Pope. The vendetta on the Catholic Monarchs of Europe was approached in a less obvious manner. Cleverly, the Jesuits determined not to act in their own name, but decided to work through front groups and to have them take the blame for their revenge.
In this way, the Jesuits would continue to appear to be disbanded and innocent of any involvement in the matter. The first front group the Jesuits used was called the Illuminati. The Illuminati was organized in Bavaria by a Jesuit professor, Adam Weishaupt, on May 1, 17, 76, just 3 years after the Jesuits were disbanded. Many sources only casually mentioned that Weishaupt was a former Jesuit, and they usually state he was an ex Jesuit. In reality, Weishaupt never left the order.
As for the order itself, it never was truly disbanded.
Speaker 1: In Bavaria, when the Illuminati was founded in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt, Weishaupt is used by the Jesuits then to continue the work of the Jesuit Order under another name. Weishaupt never repudiated the Jesuits. That's a lie of many many conspiratorial historians controlled by the Pope. They wanna create this dichotomy between the Illuminati and the Jesuits. Never fall for it.
Weishaupt was operating under orders from a superior. Richie, at the time, was a general, then later another superior. Weishaupt then enters into an alliance with the House of Rothschild. So now we see the Rothschilds, the Jewish Rothschilds, Red Shield become the bankers for the Jesuit order during the upheaval we are we will know as the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars. So this alliance between the Jesuits and the House of Rothschild, these high level masonic Jews, is very important to realize at this point because we have to live with it and deal with it today.
Also Bavaria is the stronghold of the Jesuits. There was a huge inquisitional torture chamber there in Nuremberg. Interesting that the Nuremberg trials and the Nazis would be held there. And the
Speaker 4: very principles of the Illuminati, the way the organization was run, It's the very principles of the Jesuit order, and that's found in in Nestor Webster's book called Secret Societies.
Speaker 0: In 18/14, Francois Charles de Berghiem reported on Germany's secret societies and stated, the oldest and most dangerous association is that which is generally known under the denomination of the Illumiense, and of which the foundation goes back towards the middle of the last century. Bavaria was its cradle. It is said that it had for founders several chiefs of the order of the Jesuits. Through the Illuminati, the Jesuits sought to take over various powerful secret societies, especially the higher degrees of freemasonry.
Speaker 4: If you study all of the different organizations in the world, whether it be the Knights of Malta, the Bilderbergers, the Club of Rome, the Council on Foreign Relations. As you study all these different groups, and the Knights of Malta would be included in that, you find that they are like a buffer behind which the Jesuit order operates.
Speaker 0: In his book, proofs of a conspiracy, John T Robinson wrote concerning the masonic lodges. At this time, 1798, the Jesuits interfered considerably, insinuating themselves into the lodges. Robinson went on to say, this society is well known to have put on every shape and to have made use of every mean that could promote the power and influence of the order. And, we know that at this time, they were by no means without hopes of reestablishing the dominion of the Church of Rome in England. And with the Illuminati and the higher orders of freemasonry, the Jesuits fomented the destruction of the very monarchs who had opposed them beginning with the French Revolution and later with Napoleon Bonaparte.
Speaker 1: The French Revolution was launched and waged by the Jesuits using, Grand Orient Freemasonry and Scottish Rite Freemasonry in England for the purpose of punishing the Roman Catholic Monarchs of Europe, Taking back the Vatican Empire from the Pope. Tearing away the colonies from England, Protestant England. They were doing several things at one time. Remember the Jesuits are the great hegelians. They can think along 10, 20, 50 different lines at the same time and coordinate them all together.
So to understand what we do, we have to think dialectically. We can never think linearly. So the purpose of the French Revolution, 1st and foremost, was to punish the Roman Catholic Monarchs of Europe. And that they did. What happened?
Why they beheaded Louis the 16th. The grandson of Louis 15th. We're gonna teach you bourbons of France who you mess with, whom you suppress the gentleness. And then we're going to behead his wife, Marie Antoinette. And she was the daughter of Maria Theresa.
She was a Hapsburg. Habsburg. So we're gonna punish you Habsburgs. You suppress us, we're gonna cut off the head of Marie Antoinette using our Jacobins. And then you Berganzes of Portugal, we're gonna drive you into exile using Napoleon.
They did. They had to go into South America. And you Bourbons in Spain, we're gonna drive you into exile too. We're gonna have Napoleon set up a little Banana Republic up here in Spain. And, so and then the Knights of Malta?
How dare you kick us off your island of Malta in 17/68? We're gonna teach you a lesson. So they took Napoleon down here with his with his huge fleet, took all the treasures of the Knights of Malta, and took all their weapons so that they could use that in the invasion of Egypt. At which time, the Jesuits used Napoleon to kill all the Mamluks, the bodyguard of the caliph of Egypt. So now they're waging war against Islam like they are today.
Speaker 0: When Napoleon's usefulness came to an end, the Jesuits had him betray his soldiers in a war with Russia. Like many of the founding fathers of America, the French soldiers were very nationalistic, and they would be a problem in the future plans of the Jesuits. After his defeat in Russia, Napoleon was forced to abdicate. Working in the shadows, the Jesuits made sure he was kept in reserve should he be needed. So Napoleon was sent to the island of Elba and given an annual pension of CHF2,000,000.
Then, on August 7, 18 14, the unthinkable occurred. Pope Bias the 7th restored the Jesuit order.
Speaker 1: Jesuits were revived in 18 14, with the papal bull by pope Pius the 7th, which brought them back into existence.
Speaker 0: The suppression of the Jesuits was to last forever. It only lasted 41 years. Former US President John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson in 18 16 about the rebirth of the Jesuits and the danger they posed to America. Adams stated plainly, I do not like the resurrection of the Jesuits. They have a general now in Russia in correspondence with the Jesuits in the United States, who are more numerous than anybody knows.
Shall we not have swarms of them here in as many disguises as only a king of the gypsies can assume, dressed as painters, publishers, writers and school masters? I have lately read Pascoe's letters over again and 4 volumes of the history of the Jesuits. If ever any congregation of men could merit eternal perdition on Earth and in hell, it is this company of Loyola. Jefferson replied back to Adams, like you, I disapprove of the restoration of the Jesuits, for it means a step backward from light into darkness. Coincidentally, the restoration of the order occurred 1 month before the first meeting of the Congress of Vienna in 18/14.
The Jesuits were deeply involved in this meeting. When the monarchs of Europe began fighting among themselves, the Jesuits manipulated the circumstances to bring Napoleon back for an encore performance. The famous 100 days. The monarchs gathered in Vienna came to terms quickly in order to meet this renewed threat. The Jesuits careful manipulation of the events being played out like a chess game.
Again, it must be remembered that the society of Jesus never wanted to do away with kings. The Jesuits only wanted to punish those who had suppressed the order. In March of 18 15, 9 days after the Congress of Vienna ended, Napoleon led his patriotic monarchy hating men to defeat by attacking the wrong spot of the British lines at Waterloo.
Speaker 1: The Battle of Waterloo was deliberately lost by Napoleon as explicated by our great southern general, Thomas Jonathan Stonewall Jackson, when he reviewed the battlefield. And you can find this in Dabney's great work with his, biography that he wrote on Stonewall Jackson called The Life and Times of Stonewall Jackson. And when Jackson went there, he said, Napoleon attacked from the wrong position. He should have attacked over here. And exacts exactly what happened.
Napoleon deliberately sacrificed his army at Waterloo so that there would be the least amount of true patriots in France to resist the return of King Louis the 18th into France who immediately restored the Jesuits and restored the inquisition.
Speaker 0: Having no further need of Napoleon, the Jesuits made sure he was sent far away to the island Saint Helena in the South Atlantic. While there, he was poisoned and died in 18/21. In his memoirs, Napoleon maintained his loyalty to the Catholic church, but had this to say about the Jesuits. The Jesuits are a military organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery.
And the aim of this organization is power. Power in its most despotic exercise. Absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man. We have stated that the Jesuits were deeply involved in the Congress of Vienna. Ostensibly, this meeting of the monarchs of Europe under the direction of the Jesuits was for the purpose of reorganizing Europe, restoring the balance of power, and discussing the creation of a federation of Europe.
According to author Burke McCarty, the Congress of Vienna and several other secret meetings were in reality black conspiracy against popular governments.
Speaker 4: After the constitution is signed, protestant principles are put in place in the United States. You go into the early 1800s. The Napoleonic Wars are being fought in Europe, in Russia. But finally, the Napoleonic Wars have stopped. All of the monarchs of Europe convene in Vienna, Austria.
The man who headed it was Clemens von Metternich of Austria. Russia was there. England was there. France was there. They all came there to Vienna to decide on a big problem in the world.
There were governments of the people, by the people and for the people that were being established. And these monarchs of Europe and the Pope himself, Pope Pius the 7th, and the newly formed, reestablished Jesuit Order in 18/14, they all came together and they said, if we don't destroy these free popular governments, eventually, the principles of those governments will destroy us. So at the Congress of Vienna, it was voted that they would pursue the destruction of any free governments in this world. And in 18/14, the one government that was the thorn in their side was the United States of America.
Speaker 0: 8 years after the congress of Vienna, the same parties met in Verona, Italy for a second meeting to discuss the United States of America and the threat of popular governments. For posterity's sake, on April 25th, 1916, senator Robert l Owen of the United States Congress entered into the congressional record, the secret treaty of Verona that was signed by the monarchs of Europe. These kings of Europe, under the control of the Pope, called themselves the holy alliance. The first article stated, the high contracting powers engage mutually in the most solemn manner to use all their efforts to put an end to this system of representative governments. The 3rd article gave special thanks to the pope for what he has already done for them and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations.
Speaker 2: Now the Treaty of Verona was an agreement between the Catholic Monarchies of Europe and the Vatican to destroy the concept of representative government worldwide.
Speaker 4: Samuel B. Moore shows conclusively that Medtner Nitsch and the Jesuit Order and Pope Pius VII, they all agreed that the way that they would destroy the United States would be by sending as many Catholic immigrants to the American shores as they possibly could. So thousands and thousands of Catholics were sent to the United States. Thousands and thousands of Catholic priests and many Jesuit coagitores were sent to America to take over and destroy this government.
Speaker 0: The treaty was signed on November 22, 18 22 in Verona, Italy by Metternich of Austria, Chateau Briand for France, Bernstead for Prussia, and Nessel Road for Russia. After reading the secret treaty, senator Owens pointed out that the threat under the secret treaty of Verona to suppress popular governments in the American Republics is the basis of the Monroe doctrine. This secret treaty sets forth clearly the conflict between monarchial government and popular government, and the government of the few as against the government of the many.
Speaker 4: Because of the congresses at Vienna and Verona in 18/14/18 22, there was an English statesman who was at both of those meetings. His name was Lord George Canning. And in, Burke McCarty's book called The Suppressed Truth About the Assassination of Lincoln, It says in there that George Canning warned the United States government as to what was going on. Canning was in contact with a man by the name of John Quincy Adams, who was a congressman at that time. He wrote to Adams.
He said, the monarchs of Europe, the pope, and the Jesuits are planning to destroy America. Quincy Adams took the information to the president at that time, a man by the name of Jim Monroe. We know him as James Monroe. James Monroe took the information, wrote to a former president who was still alive at that time. The man's name was Tom Jefferson, who was in retirement at Monticello.
Jefferson wrote back to Monroe, and he said, this is the greatest affront to America since the revolution. He said we need to do everything we can to oppose and stop this holy alliance set up by the monarchs of Europe, the pope, and the Jesuit order.
Speaker 0: In his letter to Monroe in 18/23, Jefferson said he did not want to pass up an opportunity of declaring our protest against the atrocious violations of the rights of nations by the interference of anyone in the internal affairs of another so flugidiously begun by Bonaparte and now continued by the equally lawless alliance calling itself holy.
Speaker 4: America's response to these two congresses was James Monroe's State of the Union address called the Monroe doctrine, where he told the powers of Europe, he said, you stay over there. You fight your wars in Europe. We'll stay over here. If you ever colonize in the Western Hemisphere, we will consider it an act of war. That was the Monroe Doctrine.
But in our history books today, we read nothing of the role of the Pope and the Jesuit order to destroy America. Nothing is in our books today to that effect. But that's why the Monroe doctrine was written.
Speaker 0: The Jesuits convened a meeting in Chery, Italy in 18/25 to discuss tactics for dealing with the Protestant nations. Unknown to the 13 Jesuits gathered for this clandestine meeting, a young novice named Leoni was in the adjoining library. Leoni could not believe his ears and began to take notes of what was being said for posterity. An English translation appeared in 18/48. What Leoni heard was no less than the Jesuit plan for world domination, and the destruction of heretics, especially the heretics in Protestant America.
As to the Jesuit plan for world government, you well know that what we aim at is the empire of the world. As to their plan for working in secret, let us prefer a secret war, which, though less brilliant, is more sure to bring us the advantage. Let us shun too much light. As to the pope, also known as the Vicar of Christ, we may say that God designs for extermination like the Canaanites, all the nations that obstinately refuse to enter into the unity of the church, and that the vicar of Jesus Christ is appointed to execute these judgments in due time. As to Protestant and non Roman Catholics who do not join Rome, we have, however, one source of rejoicing.
We cherish at the bottom of our hearts this principle that whatever does not unite with us must be annihilated. That Protestantism must therefore be utterly abolished. As to the Bible, then the Bible, that serpent which with head erect and eyes flashing fire, threatens us with its venom whilst it trails along the ground shall be changed again into a rod as soon as we are able to seize it. And what wounds will we not inflict with it upon these hardened pharaohs and their cunning magicians? The Monroe doctrine was ratified in 18/23.
The Jesuit meeting in Chery, Italy took place in 18/25. 1 year later, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died on the same day. Both of these former presidents and defenders of the constitution died on July 4th, 18 26. What are the odds that these two men so critical to the birth of the United States and enemies of the holy alliance, the Vatican, and the Jesuits would die on the same day? The day they died was the 50th anniversary of the adoption of the declaration of independence.
Autopsies were not performed on the former presidents, and it was assumed that they died of natural causes. Another strange coincidence would be the death of James Monroe on yet another 4th July in 18/31. Monroe left office in 18/25, and supposedly died of tuberculosis 6 years later. It should be noted that the symptoms associated with arsenic poisoning, difficulty in breathing, dryness and tightness of the throat, seizures, and burning pain are similar to those of tuberculosis. George Morgan commented on these strange circumstances in his book, The Life of James Monroe.
Morgan states, as John Adams and Thomas Jefferson had died on the 4th 5 years before, Monroe's death added to the wonder as though a power aloft had taken cognizance of the peculiar patriotism of these mortal men and had translated them. Is it possible that the power aloft was not from heaven and was not benign? Perhaps this power was not looking at the nationalism and patriotism of these men with joy as much as with a vengeful eye. As the Jesuit oath clearly states, a Jesuit vows to make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly against all heretics, Protestants, and Liberals. As I am directed to do to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth.
That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poison cup, the strangulation cord, the steel of the poynard, or the leaden bullet. Others have even pointed out George Washington's sudden death in 17/99 as very suspicious.
Speaker 1: There is evidence that the Jesuits assassinated a few American presidents before the war between the states. The first president they assassinated was George Washington. He was poisoned with anthrax. But one of his 3 attending physicians was behind that poisoning. Remember, from the day he took sick to the day he died was a mere 2 to 2 and a half days according to Hedley's great work, the life of Washington.
So he was murdered.
Speaker 0: Why would the Jesuits want to kill George Washington? Like Jefferson, Adams, and Monroe, Washington was first and foremost a nationalist, and warned against foreign influence. He promoted a policy of neutrality and the avoidance of European alliances. Washington repeated his isolationist policy in his farewell address that was published in newspapers throughout the country. Washington wrote, it is our policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world.
Besides this admonition to avoid foreign alliances, Washington loudly declared America should keep itself free from foreign influence. Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, I conjure you to believe me, fellow citizens. The jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake. In addition to these publicly expressed opinions, Washington had acted swiftly to put down the Jacobin inspired whiskey rebellion in 17/93 with 15,000 troops. Instigating the rebellion was the French ambassador, Edmond Gannet, and the revolutionary democratic clubs that had sprung up in America.
Gannett and the democratic clubs were linked to the Jacobin clubs in France. In her book, World Revolution, Nesta Webster states, these Jacobin Clubs were organized by the revolutionary committee under the direct inspiration of the Bavarian Illuminati. The Jesuits created the Illuminati and were thus working through the democratic clubs in America. Washington never realized he was taking on the Jesuits when he crushed the Whiskey Rebellion. John Adams became president after Washington left office.
During John Adams' administration, war with Illuminati controlled France was averted, but Washington made it known he would not resist a call from Congress to assume command of the army. Furthermore, Washington endorsed the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts that were designed to protect the United States from the extensive French Jacobin conspiracy. It is therefore no wonder that the vengeful eye of the Jesuits was focused on George Washington. After leaving office in 17/97, Washington lived only 2 years 9 months. From the onset of his illness in 17/99 to his death was a mere 2 days.
As with Monroe's death, the symptoms leading up to Washington's death were difficulty in breathing, tightness of the throat, and burning pain. Washington was only 67 years old when he died. Like Jefferson, Adams and Monroe, there was no autopsy with Washington's death. However, the Jesuits made sure they had a servant on hand, Tobias Lear, to carefully plant the story that Washington had neglected to take off his wet clothes after coming in from his day of riding about his farms in snowy weather. Washington had taken cold undoubtedly from being so much exposed the day before and complained of a sore throat.
Lear said this even though Washington explicitly told him that his great coat had kept him dry. According to Lear, we are to believe that George Washington, who survived the hardship of a winter at Valley Forge and other severe winters did not know how to take care of himself in bad weather? The more likely truth is that Washington had opposed the plans and schemes of the Society of Jesus and was assassinated for his interference. Other American presidents, both in the 19th 20th centuries who would run afoul of the Jesuits order would meet untimely deaths. For instance, the short presidency of William Henry Harrison.
Harrison had been elected president on March 4, 18 41. He would serve as president for only 35 days. At the end of March, the newly elected president came down suddenly with an illness and died. Many thought this was the result of his long inaugural address, which lasted over 2 hours in cold weather. But Harrison had been fine after the speech, and weeks had passed since the inauguration.
Why was Harrison assassinated? One only has to go to his inauguration address to find the main reason. Harrison stated in the 4th paragraph of his speech. We admit of no government by divine right believing that so far as power is concerned, the beneficent creator has made no distinction amongst men that all are upon an equality, and that the only legitimate right to govern is an express grant of power from the governed. Like other leaders in the past, Harrison was thumbing his nose against the holy alliance who practiced the divine right of kings to wield power as sanctioned by the pope.
Harrison was also unwilling to accept Texas, a slave territory, into the union, which ran against the Jesuit plan of using the slave issue to agitate and divide the northern states from the southern states. Unlike Adams, Jefferson, and Monroe, the Jesuits did not wait for the 4th July to eliminate the heretical president Harrison. Harrison was poisoned at the end of March and died on April 4th, 18 41. Vice president John Tyler succeeded Harrison as president. The annexation of Texas was accomplished in 18 45 under the watchful eye of the new president.
Another president who died suddenly in office was Zachary Taylor. Taylor was elected president in 18/48. Taylor was a southern slave holder who did not want to see slavery extended to any more areas of the country. Like Washington, Taylor was devoted to the union of the American states, was very popular, and was a military man. Another crisis over slavery occurred by the Jesuits in 18/50.
A compromise was being pushed to avert a split in the union. Taylor did not like the compromise being worked out in congress. On July 4, 1850, Taylor attended the groundbreaking ceremonies for the Washington Monument. He was fine upon returning back to the presidential mansion, then he became ill after eating some raw fruit that some say was a bowl of cherries. A violent fever came upon him.
Senator Benton commented that the violent attack commencing soon after his return to the presidential mansion. Old Rough and Ready frustrated his assassins and managed to fight the poison for 5 days and avoided the 4th July curse. President Taylor died on July 9th. The Jesuits removed a strong unifying leader and replaced him with a more malleable president in Millard Fillmore. Fillmore signed the compromise in 1850, just 2 months after Taylor's death.
As the Jesuit agitation of the American states was reaching its climax in the 18 fifties, A trial occurred in 18 55 at a courthouse in Illinois that would bring 2 faithful men together. These 2 men would join forces to fight the Jesuits. The first was a rebellious Roman Catholic priest by the name of Charles Chinequi. The second was a lawyer by the name of Abraham Lincoln. Charles Chinequi did not approve of the corrupt conduct of many of the priests he knew.
These evil priests were drunkards, sexually promiscuous, and thieves often stealing money and property collected from their parishioners.
Speaker 2: The priesthood in Chicago was very corrupt morally and, every other way. They, I mean, they were drinking heavily. They would go on these retreats, and take up a collection between themselves, put it all in a pot, and go out and, buy a
Speaker 1: lot of
Speaker 2: booze. And they also rented a lot of hookers. Apparently, there was a lot of, you know, sexual deviance going on at the time as well. And he didn't like that though. And he tried to change it.
He quoted exclusively from the Bible and his Bishop just could not tolerate that.
Speaker 0: The heads of the Roman church wanted to ignore these illicit and illegal activities. When he did not, bishop Reagan of Chicago and another priest by the name of Labelle arranged to have Chinequi accused of rape. Chinequi needed a good attorney. An attorney by the name of Abraham Lincoln was suggested.
Speaker 2: Abraham Lincoln had a a team of other lawyers under him. Right? It's like a regular defense team. Lincoln being one lawyer, a gentleman by the name of Stephen r Moore, was another lawyer. And that was a big court case at the time.
It was the most important court case that Lincoln ever had in his entire legal career, as a matter of fact, But it's been buried by the Illinois government.
Speaker 0: The trial did not go well for Chinooki. The general feeling was that he would be convicted.
Speaker 2: Local newspapers of the time, they speculated that Chiniqui was going to be found guilty. And, that was being broadcast, throughout the entire Catholic community at that time.
Speaker 0: Fortunately, for Geniqui, a witness came forward for the defense. Her name was Philomene Schwartz. Miss Schwartz had been in father Labelle's house the day the plot to frame Chinequi had been concocted. Schwartz contacted Lincoln and agreed to testify.
Speaker 2: She caught the midnight train to Urbana and met up with Abraham Lincoln and explained to me exactly what happened.
Speaker 0: Once Bishop Reagan and father Labelle found out about the potential witness, they fled the city. The prosecution dropped the charges, and Chinequi was vindicated. As they left the courtroom, Charles Chinequi was in tears.
Speaker 1: Lincoln says to him, why are you crying, mister Chinequi? He says your agents have your enemies have fled, and you're free to go. And he said, I'm not crying for myself, mister Leaking. I'm crying for you. He said, because I saw no less than 11 Jesuits with the sentence of death on their face today in this courtroom.
And know for a surety they will kill you for what you have done. And Lincoln says, well, let let this be my death warrant. And he gives Genequi a bill for a mere $50. And then Lincoln sobers up and said, it matters not where a man must die, but that he must die at the post of duty and honor.
Speaker 0: Chiniqui's words of warning to Lincoln would prove to be true. The conspiratorial hand of the Jesuits at work. A conspiracy to further their goal of a world under papal control. Abraham Lincoln was elected president of the United States 5 years after Charles Chinequi's trial. By 18/60, agitation between the north and the south was so great that many of the southern states decided to leave the union over Lincoln's election.
This agitation was designed from the beginning to drive a wedge between the north and the south and bring about a war that would result in the death of countless protestants, clearing the way for the Jesuits to reconstruct America into a tool of conquest. Lincoln had no military background. And the perception in the south was that he was incapable of mounting a war to stop the southern states from leaving the Union. However, the Jesuits had studied Lincoln and knew he would be a very effective leader. In his own way, Lincoln would serve the Jesuit ends.
Those ends were, 1, to kill protestants who lived mainly in the south, and 2, to undermine the constitution, especially the doctrines of state sovereignty and states' rights. Once in office, Lincoln refused to accept the right of any state to leave the union. He also refused to remove the federal troops from Fort Sumter under the command of major Robert Anderson, who was a freemason. As tensions mounted, the Jesuit controlled freemasons on both sides turned the standoff into a bloody war.
Speaker 1: It's no coincidence that general Beauregard, a Roman Catholic freemason, fired the first shots at Fort Sumter, and it's no coincidence that a Presbyterian Protestant Freemason incited those shots to be fired when he sent down the Star of the West to reinforce Fort Sumter, and that was Mason James Buchanan. James Buchanan started the war when he sent down the Star of the West, that ship, to reinforce the harbor because the southern states had lawfully seceded if we had a union of consent. And I would like to add here that the 3 states that that specifically reserved their right to secede in their state ratification papers were Virginia, Rhode Island, and New York. And if those 3 states reserved the right to secede to withdraw the powers, the specific powers they had delegated to Washington, then every other state had the right. So the Southern states had the right to secede.
The North had no right to stop it. So therefore, an attack against the southern states who had seceded was an act of war, and therefore, it was indeed a war of northern aggression against the southerners who had rightfully seceded.
Speaker 0: As the war progressed, it was obvious that not all was as it appeared to be on the surface. Time and again, generals on both sides made blunders and missed opportunities that would have ended the war sooner rather than later. The most glaring of these missed opportunities was the first battle of the conflict, the first battle of Manassas on July 21, 1861. Lincoln had ordered the invasion of the south by union troops. To stop them, southern forces were moved into position in Virginia under Brigadier General Joseph e Johnston and Brigadier General PGT Beauregard.
Beauregard had ordered the firing of the first shot at Fort Sumter, and his family was not only Roman Catholic, but also had Jesuit ties. During the course of the battle, the confederate forces were beaten back until colonel Thomas j Jackson stood his ground against the invading northern army. Stonewall Jackson's heroic stand paved the way for the routing of the invading union forces that soon withdrew towards Washington DC. Incredibly, the southern commanders, Beauregard and Johnston, did not pursue the defeated Union troops, although prompted by many, including Stonewall Jackson. Johnston and Beauregard let the defeated northern troops escape.
If they had pursued the northern army, the south would have annihilated their enemy and ended the war in a few days. Along with Johnston and Beauregard, there were other southern generals who seemed at times to be working against the South. Take for instance the legendary Robert e Lee. It was general Robert e Lee who ordered the disastrous Pickett's Charge at the Battle of Gettysburg on July 3, 18 63. Author and historian Bevan Alexander states, Pickett's charge was doomed before it started.
Sending massed bodies of men across nearly a mile of open ground against emplaced riflemen and banked cannons was simply an invitation for destruction. Bevan Alexander goes on to say that by insisting on fighting the north at Gettysburg and ordering Pickett's charge, Lee had lost well over a third of his army and had destroyed the last offensive power of the confederacy. It was also general Robert e Lee who refused to listen to Stonewall Jackson concerning the South's overall strategy. Jackson realized that an offensive war against the North would result in the South's defeat. No matter how skilled a battle leader Lee was, he could never win the war by pitting the far weaker resources of the South against the tremendous economic and military power of the north.
Stonewall Jackson's plan was to avoid the northern strength, its field armies, and strike at northern weakness, its undefended factories, farms, and railroads. Jackson wanted to bypass the union armies and to win indirectly by assaulting the northern people's will to pursue the war. Jackson called this unrelenting war. Lee never fully accepted Jackson's view. However, a union general named William Tecumseh Sherman did.
Sherman's march from Atlanta to the sea conducting unrelenting war broke the back of the South in 18/64 and spelled the end of the conflict.
Speaker 1: Lee was the one responsible for the defeat of and and and Teteram or Sharpsburg, when he left the the what was it? The order of 191, they wrapped up in a cigar. It was found by Yankee generals. Lee was behind that. Lee was behind not allowing Jackson to win at least 4 decisive battles against the Union forces.
And this is, spoken of and written very well in Bevin Alexander's great work, Lost Victories.
Speaker 0: It is also worthy to note this picture of Robert e Lee at the age of 38 with his son. Lee is displaying a mason sign called the hidden hand. Compare that picture with these pictures. All display the same masonic gesture. That the Jesuits had infiltrated freemasonry in the late 1700 and had taken control of the leadership of this secret society was unknown to freemasons serving in both the northern and southern armies.
Essentially, all freemasons were serving the Jesuits and the pope. Besides Lee's inactions and blunders on the battlefield, as well as those of other Confederate generals, a case can be made that the South's greatest general, Stonewall Jackson, was murdered during the 4 day battle of Chancellorsville, Lee being an accomplice.
Speaker 1: Jackson brings forth his plan to Lee how to flank Hooker's army, and then we can attack him from the rear. And Lee says, well, go ahead. Instead of saying praise God. Yes. If we can defeat Hooker, we can then march across the Potomac to Washington because that's all it would have taken.
We were this close to keeping our liberty. But because Lee is in cahoots with Hooker and there are Jesuits who are observers on the battlefield, as there were at Gettysburg. An arrangement is made between Lee and AP Hill because AP Hill hated Jackson's guts. Jackson had AP Hill arrested. This is general AP Hill.
General Jackson had general AP Hill arrested for insubordination, and Hill hated him for it. And so this was Hill's chance to get back. So Hill happens to have a subordinate general underneath him who then will be used to fire upon Jackson. So Jackson, as he arranges his his soldiers as a flank Hooker, and he tells them whatever you do, do not stop. You go you march right through the federal camp.
Well, what happens is AP Hill's general stops stops the whole movement. So everything is almost thrown in disarray and finally, this guy's convinced. Let's just keep going on. So by this time, they're losing valuable time. Still, it was a route, but it wasn't a defeat like it could've been.
And Jackson realizes that something's very wrong. He is now betrayed by AP Hill, and he's betrayed by this other subordinate. So in the evening, Jackson is recontering, trying to see what should be done, and he's fired upon by his own troops. And I show in my book that it was a conspiracy because some of the people there, Jackson, didn't know who they were. They were Confederate officers, and Jackson never seen them before.
So Jackson is wounded, but it's not mortal. He's bleeding, but he's he's bleeding severely. But what happens is that major Maguire, the doctors called to his assistants. Well, the doctor then takes him out off the way from the battlefield and amputates doctor. And from the battlefield by this doctor.
And Jackson said, our men need our doctor. Why deprive our our hurting, dying men of this valuable doctor? I'm getting better. And O'Neil Lee gives the order to go to Guinea Station, take Jackson with you. And so Jackson is being taken there, and he's beginning to recover.
And he's talking to the doctor. When can I get back? And so on. Well, the doctor gets him to Guinea Station and takes Jackson, takes him away from the main house and takes him out to this little shack where only the doctor and he are allowed to be. And it's there that this dirty freemason, Hunter McGuire, poisons Jackson, I believe, on about a Wednesday or Thursday.
And then Jackson's wife is able to come, and she sees him. But but Jackson's not well. His his his arm is it's the famous picture of him where he's had his arm amputated, but you really don't see it. His his his the sleeve is still there. And but he's been poisoned for the first time.
And then Friday or Saturday, he's given the final poisoning, and he can't survive. And so the doctor poisons him, and his wife has pleaded his wife, Julia, is pleading for him. Doctor, isn't there any more you can do for him? And so he dies. And with the death of Jackson, the poisoning of Jackson, then this very same wicked Hunter Maguire poisons Jackson's right hand man, who's also a preacher, saying to Pendleton, Colonel Pendleton, he poisoned him too.
So the Jesuits are busy using this doctrine to get rid of the true Southern Confederate leadership, Lee being a party to all of this.
Speaker 0: Like many others, Stonewall Jackson was getting in the way of Jesuit plans and had to be eliminated. At this point, we should take note of a man by the name of James Clark. Clark graduated from West Point in 18/29. After graduation, Clark was assigned to Louisiana. After a year of service, James Clark resigned his commission and converted to Catholicism.
In 18/44, Clark would become the 1st West Point graduate to join the Jesuits. Clark went on to teach mathematics and science at Georgetown University, and he became the president of Holy Cross. It was said that Clark took a lively interest in the doings of his former classmates. And just who were his former classmates? None other than Robert e Lee and Joseph e Johnston.
One can also include Jefferson Davis in this list since Davis graduated a year ahead of Clark. It can only be guessed as to what communications these former West Point graduates had with each other. But that a Jesuit was in communication with Lee, Johnston, and Davis during the period of the war between the states is surprising and somewhat shocking. And what is even more shocking were the activities of confederate president Jefferson Davis in 18/63. Protestant Jefferson Davis began corresponding with the Roman Catholic pope.
Speaker 1: Pope Pius the ninth, who was completely in the hands of the Jesuit order at this time, because he was not in their hands when he first became pope, He writes a letter to Jefferson Davis acknowledging him as the president of the United States.
Speaker 2: After the Battle of Gettysburg, there was a lot of correspondence that took place between the Davis government and the Vatican. The Davis government appealing to the pope for official help and recognition, which pope Pius the 9 eventually did give him.
Speaker 0: Davis was no stranger to Roman Catholicism. He had entered the Dominican operated college of Saint Thomas Aquinas near Springfield, Kentucky for 2 years. He was the only Protestant student at the school. Interestingly enough, the young Davis sought to become a Catholic, but was encouraged to remain protestant. 1 must ask why would the Roman Catholic church turned down a convert?
Did the Roman church have plans for Davis that would be better served with him remaining a protestant? After the war, Davis was sent a portrait of the pope. Such a gift, said a great niece, was never before conferred on any but crowned heads. General Lee also had his own picture of pope Pius the 9th, noting that the Pope was the only sovereign in Europe who recognized our poor Confederacy. Such was the attitude of these leaders of the Confederacy.
Men who were easily fooled or who were willingly playing along with the Jesuits' plan. It was these men who led the protestants of the south into a war that they had no intention of winning. Shades of Korea, Vietnam and the gulf wars come to mind. It should be remembered that for all of its posturing and open statements of support for the south, the papacy was really not on the south side at all.
Speaker 1: The open but false policy of Rome was that the pope was on the side of the south. And Chiniqui falls for this little delusion in his book, unfortunately. The secret but true policy of Rome was that Rome was completely on the side of the radical red Republicans in the North. Stevens, Sumner, Bingham, the list goes on and on. So because of this, the Jesuits made a show that they were behind the South to create more animosity on the part of the Northern Protestants against Southerners of the South because the Pope's against us by siding with the South, when in fact we wanted the utter annihilation of the southern provinces.
Speaker 0: Now let us turn our attention to the union army. What was true with the southern generals? Lincoln, to his dismay, discovered was also true with his northern generals. They had allegiances to others besides the union and Lincoln. General George McClellan failed to employ his vastly superior forces to defeat confederate general Lee on numerous occasions.
The most famous of which was at the battle of Antietam. Historian James m McPherson has pointed out that the 2 court of troops McClellan kept in reserve were in fact larger than Lee's entire force. The reason for McClellan's reluctance to put his reserve into the fight was that as in previous battles, he was convinced he was outnumbered. It should also be pointed out that McClellan was a freemason. The question has to be asked, who was McClellan really listening to?
Lincoln or the Jesuit superior general? Earlier, we noted general Lee's disastrous orders to general Pickett at the Battle of Gettysburg. At the same battle, union general George Meade allowed general Lee to escape. Meade was a Roman Catholic.
Speaker 1: And after Gettysburg, Lee is allowed to escape because a Jesuit then rides into the camp of Roman Catholic general Mead. And Roman Catholic Mead refuses to pursue Lee's army and captures only one gun when the South could have been defeated right then and there, and there would not have been the rape, pillage, and plunder from 18/63 to 65. There would not have been the destruction of General Sherman from Atlantis and Savannah. It would have been the burning down of Protestant Columbia. The the the 4 Protestant states of the South that were to be destroyed and plundered were Georgia, North and South Carolina, and Virginia.
Those are the states that were plundered. New Orleans was what? New Orleans was under Butler of the Beast, but Roman Catholic Louisiana was not persecuted. But it was those 4 key Protestant southern states that were made war upon. That would not have happened had Lee not been allowed to escape.
And Chiniqui writes of this in his book when the Jesuits rode into the camp and spoke to Mead. So it was a war against the white Anglo Saxon Protestant Baptist people of the South perpetrated by not only the generals of the North, Grant and Sheridan and Sherman and all those all those despicable criminals with their federal bandidi and their Roman Catholic Irishmen that they brought over here to steal everything they could steal off the southern plantations and to rape the black southern women that were slaves. It was a general rapine so bad that many of the black men took their women into the swamps and to deliver them from this Yankee pillage. It was a it was a complete and total grand theft and larceny of the southern people.
Speaker 0: In spite of the treacherous behavior on both sides, on April 9th 18/65, general Robert e Lee surrendered his confederate army to general Ulysses s Grant at the village of Appomattox Court House in Virginia. 2 days later, on April 11th, Lincoln made a speech discussing post war America. In the speech, Lincoln spoke in a conciliatory manner toward the southern states. Let us all join in doing the acts necessary to restoring the proper practical relations between these states and the union. They never having been out of it.
These words, taken with the amnesty for all southerners that Lincoln had proclaimed in November of 18/63 show us that the president was not looking for further reprisals or punishments against the South. However, Rome and the Holy Alliance wanted no amnesty for the South and going back to the hated constitution with states' rights and freedoms derived from the Bible. Lincoln had served his purpose. It was time for his removal.
Speaker 1: Lincoln was a useful tool thinking he was actually saving the Union because he wanted to restore the Southern states on the same footing they had left the Union, which would have frustrated the purposes of the Jesuit order by making a consolidated empire out of all the
Speaker 0: states. To ensure total chaos, the Jesuits decided Lincoln would not be the only target.
Speaker 2: So they came up with this, this plan to assassinate not just Abraham Lincoln, but the entire government.
Speaker 4: The South had lost the Civil War, so they were going to take out Abraham Lincoln, Vice President Andrew Johnson, the head of the Northern Army, Ulysses s Grant, and the secretary of the state, William Seward, all in one night.
Speaker 0: On April 14, 18 65, only 5 days after Lee's surrender, the conspirators struck. Abraham Lincoln was shot while watching a play at Ford's Theater. He died the next morning, April 15th at 7:22 AM. Secretary of state Seward was attacked at his home. The assassin, Lewis Paine, repeatedly stabbed Seward and escaped.
Miraculously, Seward recovered from his wounds. Vice president Johnson's assassin, George Axelrod, lost his nerve at the last minute and fled the scene. And General Grant avoided his assassin by leaving town earlier in the day to check on a sick friend. But who were these assassins? Most people know about John Wilkes Booth, the man who pulled the trigger and killed Lincoln.
But few realize that most of the conspirators were Roman Catholic. Even Booth had converted to Catholicism.
Speaker 4: It's clear that John Wilkes Booth, while he was a member of the Knights of the Golden Circle, at the time he was plotting Lincoln's assassination, he was also meeting in the home of a very devout Roman Catholic woman by the name of Mary Surratt, right in Washington, DC. And it was in her home that the plot to kill Lincoln was hatched.
Speaker 1: The Jesuits of Washington DC put together the plot for the assassination. The Jesuits of power behind that plot was Bernadine f Wiggott.
Speaker 6: Jesuits under the stream of an induction, they were not directly to be involved. They only were the, the, the elements, the intellectual, element that will prepare this. The case of Abraham Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln, the person, was killed by the Jesuits of Rome, but there was no Jesuits there involved directly. Nevertheless, was the Jesuit who prepared the plot against his life and prepared and trained those who were to kill him.
The invasion.
Speaker 0: Yes. To be sure, the assassins were also southerners, but they were first and foremost Jesuit assassins and agents of the foreign dictator called the pope. Among the conspirators was Mary Seurat's son, John Seurat. His tale leads to the very doors of the papal palace in Rome.
Speaker 2: 4 of them were eventually hung and the rest were sent to prison for various lengths of time. Booth was killed in a barn, but the story around Surratt is absolutely amazing. Surratt, after the assassination, John Surratt escaped, to Canada. Now the southern government had a kitchen cabinet based in Montreal. So that's the first place he went, was to Montreal.
And who's in Montreal to meet this this, sirat was 2 priests. And they scrolled him away for about 6 months. At the same time, the government is looking all over for this guy. He's like the biggest manhunt in US history, and they can't find him. And, so and here he is sitting in a in a, a little town outside of Montreal, being protected by priests.
Speaker 1: The Jesuits were behind this assassination. They controlled Sirat. Sirat called time outside of Ford's Theatre. John Wilkes Booth, does the shooting. The the guard the Secret Service guard who's supposedly supposedly to be guarding the entranceway to the Booth of Lincoln, He just happens to leave his post, and he's never punished for it.
So the assassination takes place. Surratt escapes to Canada. He's taken to Liverpool. He's taken from there to Rome. He enlists in the Popesawave army.
And in 18/67, he is discovered through another, Roman Catholic who reveals the truth about it. And, he is then brought back to the United States and put on trial. He has 2 trials. And because Roman Catholics have more allegiance to their priests in Buchanan law than they do our our country, when a Roman Catholic's on a jury, they can hang a jury and and let the murderer go free, and that's exactly what happened to John Sur.
Speaker 0: As a result of the Surat affair and the papal policy of not allowing Protestant churches within the city of Rome, the United States of America ended diplomatic relations with the Vatican in 18/67. But even with the end of diplomatic relations with the US, the Jesuits had achieved a great victory. First, 100 of 1000 of Protestants were dead. 2nd, much of the Protestant South lay in ruins. 3rd, forcing the South at gunpoint to stay in the union have dealt a severe blow to the constitution and the concept of freedom.
And lastly, Lincoln was dead and the Jesuits were avenged for his interference in the Chiniqui trial and his attempt to restore the republic to its pre war state. Adding insult to this situation, the jesuit controlled radical republicans in congress. Men like Charles Sumner and Thaddeus Stevens were able to pass the 14th amendment in 18/68. The 14th amendment created a new type of citizen, a citizen of the United States. Whereas before a man was a citizen of the state in which he was born, Citizenship was now at the national level.
Ostensibly, this new citizenship was created to help the freed slaves, But in reality, it was a measure that would allow the federal government to strip away constitutional rights from the people, and replace those rights with privileges granted by the government.
Speaker 1: In Maxwell versus Dow of 18 99, the supreme court said that none of the Bill of Rights are privileges and immunities of 14th Amendment US Citizenship. And the great dissent by John Marshall Harlan, the first Harlan must be read by every viewer as he goes out of his chair to say that we don't enjoy real liberty. That our rights of American freemen have been overthrown. And our Anglo Saxon liberties are gone. And then he reiterates in 1908 in Twining versus New Jersey when Twining versus New Jersey comes out and says, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Third Amendment, the 4th Amendment, the 5th Amendment, the 6th Amendment, the 7th Amendment, the 8th Amendment, none of those amendments are privileges and immunities of United States citizenship under the 14th amendment.
That's why in court, you take your 5th amendment privilege. That's why you you own a gun with a privilege. That's why you worship God now by a privilege granted from Washington. This ought to make us irate. All we have is Soviet citizenship.
But all of us are, whites and blacks were all slaves of the Jesuits from Washington DC. And when none of us have any absolute rights to limit the powers of Washington, the only thing that limits of Washington's powers and decisions is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's controlled by the Jesuits of Georgetown. You got 5 Roman Catholics sitting on it now.
Speaker 0: But why was it so important to the Jesuits to create a nation? In his book, a constitutional view of the law of the late war between the states, Alexander Stevens tells us why.
Speaker 1: In volume 2, Alexander Stevens tells us on page 650 the real reason of the 14th Amendment. Quote, consolidation and empire. That's the purpose of the amendment. Consolidation of the states and empire. That's why I call it the Pope's Holy Roman Fourteenth Amendment, corporate, fascist, socialist, communist empire created by this 14th Amendment.
He goes on and says, they have not as yet openly denied the federative character of the Government. However, in direct war upon its principles, their acts have been covertly aimed. This is an exceedingly important fact to be specifically noted and kept in mind. These monstrous reconstruction measures, with all their enormities and fatal tendencies towards ultimate complete centralism and empire, are still based upon the assumption that the states, as separate integral parts, constitute members of what is still, in words at least, acknowledged to be a Federal Union. All these bold usurpations of power are, upon their face, nothing but resorts to induce or to compel under duress the peoples of the several Southern States to go through the forms of adopting the 14th Amendment as an additional article to the Constitution.
So he then concludes, no system of representative government can be long maintained by any people who have not the intelligence to understand it, the Patriotism to approve it, and the Virtue to maintain and violate both its form and principles as established. So this is the reason for the 14th Amendment, consolidation and empire. And this is what Andrew Johnson understood was the purpose, and so he campaigned against it. And he called Lee a hero if that was the real reason for this war, to keep this consolidation and empire from being formed. The 14th amendment was proclaimed ratified on July 28, 18 68.
That was the end of the Washington's Republic as established in 17/87. So our white Anglo Saxon, Protestant, and Baptist Calvinist Federal Republic of these United States lasted from 17/87 to 18/68. And a new nation was established in 18/68 and that is called the American Empire in my book, and it has existed from 18/68 to the present. And it is squarely in the hands of the papacy for two reasons, for destroying heretics, liberals, perfidious Jews, and infidel Muslims and Buddhists over the last 100 years since the Spanish American war or since, really, the Indian War of the Great Plains. The War of the Great Plains from 18 60 to 18 90 was the annihilation of the Native American Indians so that they could build an empire from sea to shining sea, a terrible crime.
And it was all led by, a Roman Catholic army general named Philip Sheridan, who was advised by the America's most powerful Western Jesuit at the time, Pierre de Schmidt, and it was as Philip Sheridan who said, the only good Indian is a dead Indian.
Speaker 0: With the 14th amendment, the constitution of the founding fathers was tossed into the dustbin of history. And centralization of power in Washington DC was well underway. Now the American empire could begin in earnest. The American states, both in the north and south would be subservient to the federal government and would be essentially slaves to this new master. In rapid secession, the United States found itself in one war after another.
The Spanish American War, World War 1, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, Gulf War War, Gulf War 2, and a host of smaller police actions, such as in Somalia, Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Libya. Looking over the last 150 years, one can discern the influence of the Jesuits in the initiation of these wars and conflicts for the purpose of building a world empire under their control. Early in the 20th century, the Jesuits were determined to start a new European war.
Speaker 1: Germany expelled the Jesuits in 18/72. Russia had expelled the Jesuits in 18/20. France had expelled the Jesuits in 18/80. Britain had formally, although not in actuality, had formally expelled the Jesuits in 18/29. Every country in Europe Switzerland, 18/48.
Every country in Europe had expelled the Jesuits except Belgium. And so the Jesuits said, well, now we're gonna have to punish these people because they obviously didn't learn the lesson of the Napoleon Bonaparte. So what we're gonna do is we're gonna use Britain and we're gonna use America, and we're gonna have a second 30 years war. The first one was from 16 18 and then 1648. The second one's going to be from 1914 to 1945.
We're gonna have World War 1. We're gonna have the Bolshevik Revolution. We're gonna have the Spanish Civil War. We're going to have World War 2. We're going to just have continual war for 30 years.
We're gonna control all the factions. We're gonna control the allies. We're gonna control the axis.
Speaker 0: The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the spark that ignited the First World War. Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the heir apparent to the Austro Hungarian throne. His inclusive policy towards the Slavic peoples, and lenient treatment of Orthodox Christian Serbia, made him unacceptable to Rome. He therefore could not be allowed to rule. The assassination was set for July 26, 1914.
Since the year 1054, the Catholic church has been waging war against orthodox Christians. The orthodox Christians did not accept the supremacy of the pope. A war involving the major powers of Europe would be a opportunity to have 100 of 1000, if not millions of orthodox Serbs and Russians killed. Afterwards, Rome would be in a better position to dominate these countries. Who shot the archduke?
Gavrilo Prince, a member of the secret society called the Black Hand. The Black Hand was founded by Free Masons. During the trial, Princip testified that his colleague, Ciganovic, told me he was a freemason. And on another occasion, told me that the heir apparent, Franz Ferdinand, had been condemned to death by a freemason's lodge. Even though a masonic group carried out the murder, all of Serbia was blamed.
It was never pointed out at that time that the assassins were linked to freemasonry and that its upper levels had been under the control of the Jesuits for nearly a century. After World War 1, a movement was put in motion to have a world government that would help the nations of the world live in peace, a peace controlled by the Jesuits. When this world government or League of Nations failed to materialize, the Jesuits push forward plans to create a second world war. Even before the end of World War 1, the Jesuits had set in motion a plan to bring the Russian Orthodox Christians back into the fold of the Pope's control. Under the direction of their superior general, Vladimir Letovchowski, the Jesuits instigated the Bolshevik revolution in 1917.
This revolution brought communism to Russia. The Jesuits had been thrown out of Russia over a 100 years earlier. But now, the leader of the Bolsheviks, Vladimir Lenin, admitted the Jesuits back into Russia in 1922. Lenin proved fickle and showed signs of disloyalty to the Jesuits. For this, he was poisoned, and his replacement, Joseph Stalin, was ready to carry on with the Vatican's bidding.
As a boy, Stalin had obtained a scholarship to attend Tiflis Theological Seminary. Openly, the school was Orthodox Christianity. But behind the scene, it was run by the Jesuits. In 1931, Stalin was interviewed by Emil Ludwig. Ludwig, do you not admit that the Jesuits have good points?
Stalin, yes. They are systematic and persevering in working to achieve sorted ends, But their principle method is spying, prying, worming their way into people's souls and outraging their feelings. Once in power, Stalin killed millions of people, both Jews and Orthodox Christians. He killed anyone who would resist the new Soviet state he created based on Marxism. What many failed to understand was that Marxism was based on the jesuit slave plantations or reduciones in South America and sir Thomas More's book, Utopia.
Speaker 1: What the Jesuits did was is they were the masters of communism. Communism originates with the Roman Catholic traitor, whose name was sir Thomas More. Sir Thomas More betrayed King Henry the 8th, gave his full allegiance to the Pope, and for which reason Thomas More was executed as a traitor, holding for the Pope's temporal power over his allegiance to his king. Sir Thomas More is the author of Utopia. Utopia is the foundation for Communism.
So Communism is Romanism. In fact, the orders, the many communities of the Roman Catholic Institution, the Jesuit Order, the Redemptorists, that goes on and on. They run on communist principles of universal equality. Communis is the Latin term. So therefore, communism is a brainchild of the Jesuits, but it has been made to look Jewish through implementing it through Marx and his communist manifesto, financed also by another masonic British freemason, Engels.
Speaker 0: Besides establishing communism in Russia after World War 1, the Jesuits sought to reestablish the Pope's physical kingdom that had been taken from him in 18/71. On June 7, 1929, the Lateran Treaty was ratified, which reestablished the pope's domain called Vatican City. The new prime minister of Italy, Benito Mussolini, was instrumental in bringing about the treaty. The treaty occurred only a few months before the economic crash that started in America and quickly spread around the world called the great depression.
Speaker 1: Approximately $90,000,000 worth of gold in in lira, I think I think it was about a 1000000000 worth of lira, something like that, was given to the papacy by the Italian government. So the for reparations, for lack of a better word, because we had been suppressed from 18/70/19/29. You owe us all this money. So Benito Mussolini enslaves the Italian Catholic people, makes them pay this huge sum, which they didn't wanna pay. And what does the papacy do with this money?
Well, this treaty is in about February or March. In October, the Jesuits crashed the American stock market, and they used their their number one short seller, the Irish Roman Catholic Joseph p Kennedy, to do it. So they sell short. The margin calls can't be met. The Stock market crashes.
And what happens? The Vatican takes their 1,000,000 of dollars that they got from Mussolini, and they invest it in all the corporations and businesses that are busted on Wall Street, and they buy it all for pennies. So by the time Wall Street comes back into power, the archbishop of New York completely controls all the major corporations in this country.
Speaker 0: As banks began to fail, the Federal Reserve did not act to pump money into the system, which it should have done had those in control of it wanted to keep the banks afloat. As the chaos lingered, and many lost their jobs, and were driven into poverty, the Jesuits created a dictatorship out of the office of the president of the United States. In March 1933, the new president Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed into law a state of national emergency. Under such a state of emergency, the constitution was set aside, ostensibly for the public good, until the emergency was canceled by the president. Roosevelt never canceled the emergency.
This was verified in 1973 by the church Mathias Committee and published in senate report 93 dash 549. No American president since then has canceled the emergency. And even though Congress passed the National Emergency Termination Act in 1974, this termination was in name only. The reality was that the emergency powers taken were never returned. They continued in the US code as permanent powers.
Thus, we are currently in a state of emergency or dictatorship. It should also be noted that Roosevelt was a 32nd degree freemason. FDR was obliged to follow the orders of the head of this secret society. His oath to freemasonry superseded his oath to the US constitution. And as we have seen, the man in control of freemasonry was the Jesuit superior general.
In Germany, the Vatican had in place Adolf Hitler. It is usually not emphasized, but Hitler was a Roman Catholic. Hitler praised the Roman Catholic church saying that until now, there has never been anything more grandiose on the earth than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic church. Heinrich Himmler, Hitler's head of the SS, was also a Roman Catholic. Frederick Hoffett wrote, Hitler, Goebbels, Himmler, and most members of the party's old guard were Catholics.
After the war, Walter Schellenberg, former head of German counter espionage, stated the SS organization had been constituted by Himmler according to the principles of the Jesuit order. Himmler's title as supreme commander of the s s was to be the equivalent of the Jesuits general. Incredibly, although he killed and tortured 1,000,000, the Vatican never excommunicated Hitler. In fact, not one of the mass murderers of the Third Reich was ever excommunicated by the Vatican. The day Hitler died, the Spanish dictator Franco, also a Roman Catholic, had this statement run-in the publication reform.
Adolf Hitler, son of the Catholic church died while defending Christianity. As a loyal son, Hitler killed heretics, including protestants, Jews, orthodox Christians, and even liberal Catholics. All told, the war dead numbered between 62 to 78,000,000 people. 11,000,000 of the total dead from World War 2 died in concentration camps. 6,000,000 being Jews.
The Jewish Holocaust was never condemned by Pope Pius the 12th or, for that matter, by any other pope. Why this silence? The Jews, like all heretics, resisted conversion to Roman Catholicism and obedience to the pope. Who financed Hitler? The answer is clear and easily verified.
The Vatican and many of the wealthy elite in the west gave Hitler the money he needed to build the Third Reich. As early as 1919, archbishop Eugenio Pacelli met a young Adolf Hitler in Munich. The meeting occurred at night while all the household was asleep, except for the nun who attended archbishop Pacelli. Her name was Pasolini. According to Pasolini, Hitler told Pacelli that he was out to check the spread of aesthetic communism in Munich and elsewhere.
It did not come as a surprise to her, therefore, in light of Paselli's hatred of the reds to see the prelate present Hitler with a large cash of church money to aid the rising revolutionary and his small struggling band of anti communists. Go quell the devil's work. Help spread the love of almighty God, Pacelli told Hitler. For the love of almighty God, she heard the young man, Adolf Hitler, reply. Money for this young revolutionary also came from industrialists in the West.
Speaker 1: Hitler's rise to power was financed by London and New York and Berlin. They were the Knights of Malta running the banking institutions of the world.
Speaker 0: In the discipline of historical research, one of the greatest taboo subjects is to look into who financed Hitler. The answer is clear and easily verified. The Vatican and many of the wealthy elite in the west gave Hitler the money he needed to build the 3rd Reich. Many do not realize that Prescott Bush, the grandfather of president George w Bush, and George Herbert Walker, the maternal great grandfather of president George w Bush, were Nazi collaborators. Along with Averell Harriman, they set up Union Banking Corporation as a complex money laundering operation for a number of Nazi front businesses.
Documents at the National Archives and the Library of Congress show conclusively that Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker should have been tried for treason because their Nazi dealings continued after the US entered World War 2.
Speaker 7: They had continued to do business with their primary Nazi patron, who was Fritz Thyssen, who backed Hitler beginning in 1921 and who was the wealthiest man in Germany and a steel and coal baron who, with his partner, Friedrich Flick, essentially built the Nazi war machine along with IG Farben. In 1951, when Fritz Thiesen died in Argentina, Union Banking Corporation was liquidated by the US government and Prescott Bush received $1,500,000 for his holdings in his Nazi business and that was the beginning of the Bush family fortune for all intents and purposes. George Bush doesn't take his philosophical foundation from the Bible or the teachings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount. George Bush takes his inspiration from what he learned in Skull and Bones and from the Fool Society that Hitler and Goebbels and Goring cut their teeth in, Bohemian Grove, these evil organizations that perpetrate the ugly things that these criminals are doing to this country for which they must be held accountable.
Speaker 0: The Jesuits created the Illuminati in 17/76. The American branch of the Illuminati was called Skull and Bones and has its headquarters at CIA recruiting ground Yale University. Prescott Bush was a member as was his son and grandson, president George w Bush. It is interesting that in the 2004 presidential election, 2 skull and bones members ran against each other.
Speaker 8: You were both in Skull and Bones, the secret society.
Speaker 0: It's so secret we can't talk about it.
Speaker 8: What does that mean for America? The conspiracy theorists are gonna go watch. I'm sure they are. I don't know. I haven't seen the webinar.
322? I am first of
Speaker 0: all, he's not the nominee. And, but,
Speaker 8: look. I look for it.
Speaker 0: Are you
Speaker 4: afraid to lose?
Speaker 0: No. I'm not gonna lose.
Speaker 8: You both were members of Skull and Bones, a secret society in Yale. What does that tell us? Not much because it's a secret. Is there a secret handshake? Is there a secret code?
I wish there were something secret I could manifest. 322, a secret number? There are all kinds of secrets then, but one thing is not a secret. I disagree with this president's direction.
Speaker 0: It is evident that the Bush family and others are under and have been under the control of the Jesuits for decades. Most people are familiar with Hitler's book, Mein Kampf. However, it may surprise many that Hitler did not write the book.
Speaker 1: You know, Hitler was not a writer. You know, Hitler was a newspaper reader. According to Kurt Kruger's great book, I was Hitler's doctor, it was published in 1934. He said that Hitler's lair was just filled with old newspapers, that that's all he ever did was read. These old newspapers.
He was not a writer. He was not a student of history. He was not a student of culture. If you read Mein Kampf, whoever wrote it knew the cultures of many different countries over many different centuries. They knew all about political practices.
The writers of Mein Kampf were brilliant. And Mein Kampf, according to Leo Lehmann, who was an Irish Roman Catholic priest who wrote Behind the Dictators in 1942, said that father Bernard Stemfel was the real author of Mein Kampf.
Speaker 0: Adolf Hitler was created to be an instrument of the Jesuits. And like Napoleon, Hitler served his creator well. Millions of the Vatican's enemies were dead and America forgot George Washington's warnings and abandoned its policy of isolationism. During World War 2, the Vatican targeted the Orthodox Christians in Croatia for destruction. As in World War 1, the Orthodox Serbians of Croatia suffered again in World War 2.
A campaign of terror and murder was inflicted on the Serbs by the Croatian Ustase regime. The leader of the Ustase was Ante Pavelic, a Roman Catholic. Pavelic and the Ustase murdered around 500,000 people, while 250,000 were expelled, and another 200,000 were forced to convert to Catholicism. Like the Jewish Holocaust, Pope Pius the 12th never condemned these atrocities, nor has any Pope since then condemned them. Once the war had concluded, the Vatican helped former Nazis escape Germany to save havens in South America.
They even helped Ustase leader Pavelic escape to Argentina.
Speaker 3: Pope Pius the 12 was the pope who saved 100 of 1000 of who passed through Vatican monasteries, Dominican, Benedictine, and Jesuit, where they were given shelter, new identities, new passports, sent largely to South America, but there were plenty, sent elsewhere, including to the United States, where there was even a program to get the good ones out, Operation Paperclip, which is well known, but Canada let in. And I I I know this. Mackenzie King let in tons of Nazis who passed through the Vatican monsters, and this pope Pius the 12th could it's impossible he didn't know about that.
Speaker 0: After World War 2, a conflict began between the western powers, mainly the US and Britain, and those of the east, the Soviets and the Chinese. It came to be called the cold war. From its beginning, the cold war was a way of keeping the world in chaos and fear. Pitting the Christian nations against the communist nations. And most importantly, a way to keep the spotlight off the Vatican.
Many people knew of Rome's backing of the Catholic dictators of Europe. They also knew of Rome's aid in helping many of them to escape. The Vatican had not been punished for these crimes. In fact, Pope Pius the 12th should have stood before the judges at Nuremberg. The Jesuits used the Cold War as an effective diversion for Rome.
It worked like a charm. To get it started, a rock in the road had to be removed. That rock was General George s Patton. At the end of World War 2, General George Patton wanted to attack the Soviet Union. Patton saw the menace to the free world communism was and wanted to go ahead and end it.
Patton's conversation to General McNarny in 19 45 was revealing. Why do you care what these goddamn Russians think? We are going to have to fight them sooner or later. Why not do it now while our army is intact, and the damn Russians can have their hind end kicked back into Russia in 3 months? The Jesuits could not allow the Soviet Union to be destroyed.
As Robert Wilcox lays out in his book, Target Patent, Roman Catholic William Donovan, head of the OSS, arranged for the assassination of Patton. Patton had survived 3 previous attempts on his life. He also survived the 4th, but was hospitalized. While in the hospital, a refined form of cyanide was given to him that can cause or appear to cause embolisms and heart failure. After making preparations to leave the hospital, Patton's health took a sudden turn for the worse, and he died.
The result was that the Jesuits got their cold war. During the cold war, the activity of 2 US presidents, John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, reveals much about the power of the Jesuits. John Kennedy was a Roman Catholic who turned against the Vatican and the Jesuits. Kennedy decided to be his own man, take his own counsel, and not take orders from Rome. He turned out to be a liberal Catholic, which is just as obnoxious to the Vatican as a Protestant or any heretic.
Kennedy began to pull out of Vietnam. He ordered the Treasury Department to print money and not go through the privately held Federal Reserve, and he had plans for a new invasion of Cuba.
Speaker 1: See, Kennedy wanted Cuba back from Castro. The big lie is that Kennedy, he was he canceled the orders. He didn't cancel the orders. McGeorge Bundy canceled the order for the air cover in the Bay of Pigs. That's according to Fletcher Prouty in his book, JFK.
And on the, on the USS Essex, which was a aircraft carrier there, the the captain was told not to give any
Speaker 3: air cover to the invading, patriots here
Speaker 1: in Cuba. But that cover was canceled, not by JFK, because the night before he said he gave a go ahead. And to prove this point, there's a book that's been released about a year ago called Ultimate on December 1, 1963 and get rid of that Jesuit Fidel Castro. On November 22nd, he was killed. Maybe 9 days before the invasion was to take place.
Speaker 0: Like the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, John f Kennedy's assassination was meticulously planned and executed with Lee Harvey Oswald as the patsy.
Speaker 1: You see, Gene Hill with Mary Mormon were right there at the limousine. And Gene Hill and Mary Mormon said that the driver turned around and shot, but they thought the driver was shooting back at the shooter. They didn't know the driver was shooting JFK in the head along with the storm drain shooter, a simultaneous headshot. That shot from the grassy knoll was a distraction. They had a smoke.
I mean, we've had smokeless gunpowder since the turn of the century. I mean, why would they use a rifle and have smoke? It was a distraction for the crowd to run to the grassy knoll because the real shooters was the storm drain shooter and the driver shooting Kennedy in the head simultaneously. And I show in my book, Kennedy was shot 5 times.
Speaker 0: The assassination was done in a very public way to show other would be presidents what would happen if orders were not followed.
Speaker 1: The assassination of John Kennedy is done in broad daylight as a warning to all the other leaders of the world, but it's also done with this viciousness. Because, you see, JFK was a Catholic, and they wanted to kill their Catholic boy who refused to uphold the temporal power of the pope. So they killed him viciously and cruelly. This is a warning to any other Catholic who would dare trample the temple power of the pope.
Speaker 0: In contrast to Kennedy, Ronald Reagan did everything he could to court Vatican approval after an assassination attempt on his life in 1981.
Speaker 1: Well, Ronald Reagan was advocating some things that would have built the middle class that were generally pretty good. He was talking like a conservative. Evidently, he thought for a few minutes he was the president because he'd been told to choose George Bush as the vice presidential candidate. And all the and all the conservatives say, how could you do this to us? And yet he's still, quote, unquote, elected.
So Reagan starts to advocate some pretty good things, and so we're going to punish you, Ronnie. And so they carried out the attempted assassination. If he survives, he'll do what we're told what he's told. If he doesn't survive, well, then George Bush will openly take his place and be the president. Either way, we win.
So Jerry Parr, the secret service agent, shoots Ryan Reagan inside the vehicle and makes it look like Hinkley is the one who shot him. Hinkley did not shoot Reagan. He was Reagan was untouched when at the time he was entering this limousine. He was shot inside the limousine by a secret service agent, and, then phenomenally enough, a a Jewish doctor saved his life. So, Bush was a part of this, of course.
He, was not openly made the president, but he was secretly the president during the entire, two terms of Ronald Reagan.
Speaker 6: President Reagan has come to fulfill the greatest moment in the history of this conspiracy because no other president has come as close as president Reagan with the Vatican and even, not even John f Kennedy. What that means is they have bound to president Kennedy and to president Reagan what they were not able to do even through a Roman Catholic president.
Speaker 0: In 1984, Reagan established diplomatic relations with the Vatican. Not since 1867 had there been any official contact between the two countries.
Speaker 1: That relationship was formally restored by the worst president America has ever been disgraced with, our greatest traitor, Ronald Reagan. When he restored diplomatic relationships with the Vatican, formally recognized the sovereign state of Vatican City as a nation, And now America can enter into a concordat with the pope as warned by ex Jesuit Alberto Rivera for many
Speaker 0: years. Ex Jesuit priest Alberto Rivera also revealed a secret concerning the inauguration of Ronald Reagan that some noted at the time, but few fully understood.
Speaker 4: Alberto Rivera made a startling statement in which he said there would be a sign given to Jesuits throughout the world when all churches would be taken over by the Jesuit order. The sign was to be when a president of the United States took his oath of office facing an obelisk. For the first time in US history, the swearing in ceremonies were moved to the west front of the capitol and president Reagan faced the Washington Monument.
Speaker 0: After Reagan's presidential reign, the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, and the Cold War ended. However, instead of greater freedom, nations around the world found their governments becoming more repressive. Terrorism became the new foe, and the United States and other Western governments pledged to fight this new enemy at all cost. That included taking away all God given rights from the people in order to bring about supposed peace and safety. In America and elsewhere, many noted that the government knew about the terrorist attacks in advance, but failed to stop them.
In fact, it is now painfully obvious that the government allowed these attacks to occur. Unfortunately, the American people find themselves in the same situation and making the same mistake that the southern people made before the war between the states. In the 1800, the South, like the North, had Jesuit controlled freemasons and in key religious, political and military positions. Many newspapers were also under Rome's control. These men and media outlets created the agitation towards war.
As the slave issue escalated, pushing the South towards secession, the Southern people fully expected God to be on their side. However, like America today, the people of the South failed to understand they were not on God's side. The South did not practice biblically sanctioned slavery. The Bible authorizes 2 types of slavery, a voluntary servitude to pay off debt, and slavery as a result of war. The South did not practice these types of slavery.
The South practice man stealing or kidnapping for profit. Exodus 2116 clearly states, and he that stealeth a man and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death. For their sin and refusal to repent of man stealing, the South reaped a harvest of death and destruction. Likewise, America today is finding itself in the same situation. Instead of asking God why he did not protect them from the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.
Americans were easily manipulated with pride and cried out for vengeance against a foreign enemy. A vengeance that brought multi $1,000,000,000 profits to the death industries by promoting endless war. Instead of asking God what they had done to offend him and lose their blessed state, the American people are seeking answers and solutions from politicians, false prophets, and economic wizards. For the most part, the American people do not see a correlation between turning their backs on the God of the Bible and the disasters that have come down upon them. At the beginning of 20th century, the Jesuits decided to implement their plans to create a central bank in the United States.
Their plan would enable them to pay for the wars that were coming as the American empire expanded. Once this was accomplished, the common man would hold worthless paper, and the Jesuits would be in a position to fund new wars using the US military as its muscle.
Speaker 1: The Jesuits, in their counter reformation, have set out to destroy the Protestant reformation, which had a middle class and private rights and private wealth and private land ownership. And in their attempt to bring the world back to the Dark Ages, the 13th century, when Pope Clement III was the demon pope of all of Europe at the time, set out to destroy the Abigensis and others. To do this, to destroy Western Protestant civilization, they had to implement the pillars of the Communist Manifesto. Well, 2 of those pillars are these. The national credit would be in the hands of the federal government, so, therefore, the net the credit of this country is in the federal government as extended by the Federal Reserve Bank, which is a private bank.
Lewis versus U. S. Tells us this in a federal case. So this private Federal Reserve Bank, which is controlled by the Vatican, Lewis various orders, particularly the old crusading orders like the Knights of Malta and the Knights Templars, which are today high level freemasons. They have put upon us this horrible Federal Reserve Bank, which is the Pope's bank to finance all the Pope's crusades since no later than the Spanish American war of 18 98 to the present.
Speaker 0: In order to create the central bank, certain obstacles had to be overcome. 1st, those opposed to a central bank would need to be removed. And secondly, the law would need to be changed, or simply appear to be changed. To deal with the troublesome individuals who opposed a central bank, the Jesuits spared no expense. They built a ship of death called the Titanic.
The sinking
Speaker 1: of the Titanic was a design of the Jesuit order to get rid of, the opposition to the creation of a central bank in the United States.
Speaker 4: And the men on the Titanic were opposed to a central bank. They had to die. Among those were John Jacob Astor, Isidore Straus, Benjamin Guggenheim and a host of other millionaires who were opposed to a central bank in America. Therefore, they had to be taken out of the way. And they were on the Titanic.
Speaker 0: The company building the ship was owned by JP Morgan, who was himself an agent of the Rothschilds family. The Rothchilds being the bankers for the pope and the Vatican. The main Jesuit targets were brought on board. The captain of the ship was Edward John Smith. It appears from his actions that captain Smith was a Jesuit coagitor, that is a Jesuit who has taken the oath, but does not wear the robes.
A Coagitor blends into the scenery and never looks like a Jesuit priest. It is a veteran sea captain, Edward Smith, who orders the ship to travel through an 80 square mile ice field at full speed on a moonless night. There had been over 8 telegrams warning the captain of the danger.
Speaker 4: He's warned 8 times, slow the ship down, slow the Titanic down. You're going too fast. Not once stopped. Knew there was an ice, you know, iceberg field up ahead, knew that he should have slowed down, but didn't. And so you look and you say, how was it that this man could go headlong into a field of icebergs and not slow the ship down, not be more careful?
The only way you can the only conclusion you can draw is, as a coagitor of the Jesuit order, right through the line, the chain of command, he was told, Sink the ship. And he did. On board the Titanic, and this is all documented in a National Geographic video that was put out in 1986. You can go to your local library, and they'll either have it on hand or they can get it on library loan. But on that videotape, it shows that as the Titanic was coming up along the coast of England, it had various stops.
And at one stop, a Jesuit priest got on board. His name was Francis Brown. Francis Brown got on board the Titanic, took pictures of all of the wealthy people, took pictures of Edward Smith, the captain. And then just before the Titanic set sail across the Atlantic, Francis Brown got off. And then, of course, the Titanic sunk.
Speaker 1: Well, Francis Brown is given a camera by his bishop by his uncle, the bishop. And he is told to go down and take all these pictures of all these people we're gonna kill in 1st class. And so that's what he does. He takes picture of of all these rich people, everybody that there's that there's gonna go down, and a rich passenger offers him passage. Well, he knows the ship's gonna go down, but he he very sheepishly got in contact with his provincial.
And the provincial's message was get off that ship.
Speaker 0: Like Brown, another noted passenger, Jesuit agent JP Morgan, did not make the ill fated sea voyage. Even though booked on the ship for passage to America, Morgan also fortuitously canceled at the last minute.
Speaker 1: Of course, JP Morgan, he had a he had his own suite reserved for him. And there were some 55 men who at the last minute canceled their reservations on the Titanic. JPMorgan was one of them. Said he was sick. Oh, by the way, don't load any of my art treasures on the Titanic either.
So he didn't have any of his art treasures on it either. Didn't lose any of that.
Speaker 0: How do we know there was foul play involved with the Titanic? When the iceberg was sighted, it was first officer Murdoch who attempted to port around the deadly object. This was sound enough, but Murdoch also ordered the engines into reverse. Author Win Wade asked the obvious question. As long as Murdoch was trying to veer out of the iceberg's way, why had he jammed on the brakes, so to speak, by throwing the engines full speed astern?
In point of fact, the 1910 edition of Knight's modern seamanship clearly contradicted Murdoch's decision. The instructions are clear. Avoid reversing the engines. Wade sums up the situation by saying, Murdoch had maneuvered in a manner more likely to cause collisions than to prevent them. As with many who investigated the Titanic disaster, author Win Wade was at a loss to explain Murdoch's actions in going against the book.
But the captain and Murdoch's actions were not the only telltale signs of treachery on the night the Titanic sank.
Speaker 1: And we see all sorts of anomalies in the Titanic. For example, when it was sinking, the emergency flares were to be red So that ships in those lanes could see the Titanic was in trouble. Well, someone had taken away the red flares and replaced them with white flares, making it look like we were shooting off flares and having a party. And then the loading of the boats, we know that was a fraud. They would not they didn't allow the lifeboats to be completely loaded.
They were only half loaded. Some 1 third loaded because the targets in the first class could not be allowed to board. And the Jesuits were not only the captain, but his officers. And there had been a strike in England at the time, and the men who were normally the ones who would man the ocean liners, they were replaced by Jesuit coadjuters ready to board because they were all under oath to die for the black pope if necessary. And so they did carry out the sinking of the Titanic.
Speaker 0: But how is it possible that men will commit suicide as captain Smith and some of his handpicked crew obviously did?
Speaker 1: We have to understand that these men have died to their own self will. And so they have completely been emptied of their own personalities and upon the order of their commander will do exactly what they're told. There's no such thing as a disobedient judgment. This serves as a warning to all the other men of power, not only in our country, but in England and Europe. You mess with us, and we're gonna do to you what we did to all those people in Titanic.
And we're going to thwart the investigation because a subsequent investigation of the sinking of Titanic blamed Bruce Ismay, the right hand man of JPMorgan, and and Captain Lord of England. They were the scapegoats when they could have easily blamed the men of power at that time, saw who canceled their reservations. It was all in it was a Warren Commission all over again. 9 11 commission all over again. It's a whitewash and cover up.
And that cover up is even more powerful than the murder itself.
Speaker 0: After many of the leading opponents to a central bank had been removed, the Jesuits moved to obtain passage of the 16th amendment and the Federal Reserve Act, both in 19 13.
Speaker 1: So they created the Federal Reserve Bank to finance their crusades. Without the Federal Reserve Bank, there's no war in Iraq. Without the Federal Reserve Bank, there's no World War 2. There's no World War 1. And there's a book written by Katz called The Money Changers and in it he says that it's the Federal Reserve Bank and the creators of all this paper currency, fiat money, credit out of thin air.
Without that, you don't have these wars. So they needed the Federal Reserve Bank to create wars on heretic and liberal peoples in Europe so that they could restore the pope's temporal power throughout the European nations that was being thrown off in the 1800.
Speaker 0: Besides instigating wars and controlling the banking industry, the Jesuits have spent a great deal of time and effort attacking and undermining their number one enemy, the Bible. Specifically, the King James Bible. As stated in Leone's the secret plan, the Jesuits view the Bible as a serpent that must be made into a harmless rod. In an effort to undermine the validity of the Bible, especially the book of Genesis, the Jesuits promoted Charles Darwin's unproven theory of evolution. Evolution theory postulates that man evolved or came about by chance.
There was no God or divine agent at work in creating the world. All life had simply developed over time by mutations from a single cell that was formed 1000000000 of years ago. Supposedly, man himself had evolved from primitive ape like creatures to his present state. When the evolutionary theory needed proof of its validity, a young Jesuit priest by the name of Pierre Teilhard appeared on the scene. In 1912, Teilhard assisted Charles Dawson at the digs in England where the Piltdown man was discovered.
This so called missing link convinced most of the world that mankind had evolved from more ape like creatures. It was not until 40 years later that the pill down man was discovered to be a hoax. Philip Johnson in his book, Darwin on trial, has this to say. Many persons familiar with the evidence, including Stephen j Gould and Louis Leakey, have concluded that Teilhard de Chardin was probably culpably involved in preparing the Piltdown fraud. By the time Piltdown man was exposed, a generation had been indoctrinated into the belief that the evolutionary theory had a solid foundation in science.
The truth of the matter is that the evolutionary theory is questionable or bad science with no solid foundations in truth. To illustrate this fact, let's look at an exchange between author Luther Sunderland and doctor Colin Patterson. Luther Sunderland was a creationist author and exponent. In 1978, doctor Patterson, a senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History in London, published a book entitled Evolution. Sunderland wrote to doctor Patterson and asked why the preeminent evolutionist had not included any pictures of transitional fossils in his book.
Doctor Patterson candidly replied, I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustrations of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest that an artist should be used to visualize such transformations, but where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly, provide it. And if I were to leave it to artistic license, would that not mislead the reader?
Like a bombshell, this statement by doctor Patterson hit the evolutionary world and enraged it. Patterson sought to pacify his evolutionary colleagues, but he never recanted. To those who had a modicum of common sense, it was evident that the evolutionary emperor was not wearing any clothes. Evolution was just a theory that had no hard evidence to back it up. In his 1996 book, Darwin's black box, doctor Michael Behey made this rather pointed observation.
In the face of the enormous complexity that modern biochemistry has uncovered in the cell, the community is paralyzed. No one at Harvard University, no one at the National Institutes of Health, no member of the National Academy of Sciences, no Nobel Prize winner, no one at all can give a detailed account of how the cilium or vision or blood clotting or any complex biochemical process might have developed in a Darwinian fashion. But in spite of this and other overwhelming evidence that the evolutionary theory had no foundation in fact, the Vatican came out with an extraordinary statement. On October 22, 1996, the same year as Behe's book, Pope John Paul the second issued a statement to the Pontifical Academy in which he said, new knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more than hypothesis. This endorsement of evolution showed the true nature of the Vatican.
The God of the bible had to be denied and relegated to the past. The Jesuit plan to cast doubt on the Bible as God's word of truth had come a long way. But Darwin's theory of evolution was not their greatest achievement in undermining biblical authority. The Jesuits set in motion an attack on the original Greek text of the Bible. The New Testament was written in Greek.
For over 1900 years, the Greek text of the scriptures had endured and come down to us as it was read by the first Christians. To be sure, we now only have copies of copies of the originals, but the text has remained the same. Today, there are 5,686 Greek new testament manuscripts in existence. Of these manuscripts, the majority, over 90%, have been used over the centuries as a basis for the text of the New Testament. This majority text came out of Antioch in Syria.
Antioch became the headquarters for Christians of the 1st century. And the majority text is often referred to as the Antiochan text. But the authoritative line of manuscripts is more often called the textus receptus, or received text. The King James version is based on the received text. In the past, there have been attempts to alter the received text.
A group of Gnostic Christians centered in Alexandria, Egypt altered some manuscripts in the 3rd century. The corrupted Alexandrian manuscripts downplayed the divinity of Jesus. The famous scholar Origen seems to have had a hand in this undertaking. However, the Christians of that time were not fooled. In the 4th century, another attempt to pass on these same corrupted manuscripts was led by the Roman Catholic scholar, Jerome.
Jerome made a translation of the bible using the corrupted Alexandrian texts in 3 80 AD. Jerome called his translation, the Vulgate. Jerome's new translations was promoted by Rome and those who did not use it were persecuted. It was not until the reformation that the uncorrupted received text was again used to translate God's word into the common language. The result was such translations as Luther's German New Testament of 1522, Tyndale's English New Testament of 1526, the Geneva Bible of 1560, and the King James Bible of 1611.
Since 1611, the King James Bible supplanted other English translations to become the most revered and cherished translations of Protestant Christians throughout the world. Then in the late 1800, 2 men worked to change that. These 2 biblical scholars were Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort. Westcott and Hort created a new critical text based on the theory that the New Testament was preserved almost perfectly in the 2 oldest manuscripts, the Sinaiticus and the Vaticanus. The Sinaiticus manuscript was discovered in 18 44 in a Roman Catholic monastery.
Facsimile copies of the Vaticanus manuscript were brought out of the Vatican library in the late 1800. Both of these manuscripts were from the corrupted Alexandrian line. Using these two manuscripts as a foundation, Westcott and Hort began to put together their Greek text of the New Testament in 18/50 3. In 18/81, they completed and published their work. According to Westcott and Hort, now for the first time, the true text of the New Testament was available to believers.
Significantly, it is from the Westcott and Hort Greek text that many modern bible translations have been produced. And what has been the effect of this change to those in the pews listening to the word of God? With regard to John 118, we read in the King James version, no man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten son, which is in the bosom of the father he hath declared him. The same verse in the New International Version based on the Westcott Court text reads, no one has ever seen God, but God, the one and only, who is at the father's side, has made him known. Despite the somewhat confused rendering in the NIV, the change really amounts to altering only begotten Son to only begotten God.
The appearance of this alteration in a small body of text originating from the veritable capital of Gnosticism, Alexandria, would suggest that the Gnostics made their mark in these texts and at this verse. Gnostics saw matter as evil and spirit as good. God was spirit and could not be involved with wicked matter or flesh, especially in the conception of the child. To Gnostics, the virgin birth was an impossibility. Another example of the corrupt influence of the Alexandrian manuscript was found in acts 230.
King David is spoken of in this verse as being a prophet and knowing that God has sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne. The same verse in the New International Version based on the Westcott Hort text reads, but he was a prophet and knew that god had statement concerning the literal incarnation and physical descendants of Jesus Christ from David. This is in line with many gnostic systems, which viewed Christ as a purely spiritual being. An Aeon emanating from the everlasting. The reading presented in the traditional text where Christ in the flesh is said to be in physical descendants from David would be antithetical to these speculative systems.
There are many other examples that can be used to illustrate the point that the Westcott and Hort Greek texts holds contrary views to the doctrines and teachings of the majority of the existing Greek manuscripts. Unfortunately, most Christians today are ignorant of this and still rely on the corrupt Westcott and Hort Greek text. Since they have had such an impact on the biblical text from which many modern translations come, it might be helpful to know more about Westcott and Hort. Supposedly, these men were Protestants. Specifically, they were Anglican or Church of England Scholars.
Moreover, unlike what one would expect from a believer in the truth of the word of God, Westcott did not believe that the first three chapters of Genesis should be taken literally. In a letter to Hort, Westcott stated, no one now, I suppose, holds that the first three chapters of Genesis, for example, give a literal history. I could never understand how anyone reading them with open eyes could think they did. Westcott also doubted the miracle stories in the bible. He stated, I never read an account of a miracle, but I seem instinctively to feel its improbability.
But even more telling is Westcott's devotion to John Henry Newman. Newman, along with several other church of England clergymen, began the Oxford movement in 18/33. The purpose of the secret movement was to reunite the church of England with the Roman Catholic church. That same year, a clandestine meeting was held in Rome between John Henry Newman, Richard Frode, and Monsignor Wiseman. When asked what it would take for the church of England to be accepted back into the Roman Catholic church, Monsignor Wiseman answered, the church of England must accept the council of Trent in its entirety.
Consider that, in 18/33, the spokesman for the papacy brings up the acceptance of the council of Trent as the main condition for reuniting with Rome. The council of Trent met and declared 125 anathemas against the Protestant reformation. The pope and the Jesuits had not changed their minds then or to this day. For 12 years, Newman and his colleagues worked secretly to push the church of England back into the arms of the papacy. When this secret society and its intentions were discovered, Newman and a 150 followers defected to the Roman church.
It is apparent that Westcott was one of Newman's disciples who did not defect, but rather remained as a tool of Rome. Westcott's scholastic partner and pupil, Fenton John Anthony Hort, was no better in his biblical faith. Although Hort doubted the existence of a literal devil and of eternal punishment for the godless, he did believe in the Roman Catholic concept of purgatory. Hort stated that the idea of purgation, of cleansing as by fire seems to me inseparable from what the Bible teaches us of the divine chastisements. Hort also adhered to the Roman Catholic teaching of baptismal regeneration.
Hort stated, we maintain baptismal regeneration as the most important of doctrines. The pure Romish view seems to me nearer and more likely to lead to the truth than the evangelical. These false teachers worked ceaselessly to undermine the King James version of the Bible and install new Bible versions more acceptable to the Vatican. Bible versions like the revised standard versions, the American standard version, the living Bible, and the new international version of the bible. As mentioned earlier, the NIV is based on the Westcott Hort Greek text and its successor, the Nestle Alain Greek text.
A Jesuit translator, Carlo Cardenal Martini, was on the translation committee for the NIV. For this supposedly protestant translation of the bible, a representative of a group sworn to destroy protestants sat on the committee that created a protestant bible. So is this really a protestant bible? Once doubt had sufficiently been cast on the Bible and its veracity, the Jesuits knew the public would be less inclined to rise up in revolt as more open and drastic measures were taken to suppress the true word of God. In the 1962 Engel versus Vitale case, the US Supreme Court voted that prayer in public school was unconstitutional.
Why? Because it violated the first amendment. Prayer and school had not violated the first amendment for a 175 years, but suddenly it did? The following year, in the case of Abington versus Shep, the Supreme Court voted that the reading of the Bible was also a violation of the First Amendment. How did the supreme court arrive at these decisions?
One only has to know that the chief justice of the court, Earl Warren, was a freemason to see why the court voted as it did. And why did the president and congress not impeach these supreme court justices and remove them from the court? The answer is simple. The president and congress agreed with the decision. Otherwise, these godless justices would have been impeached and removed.
How did this happen? First, in the 19 fifties, churches began to incorporate and organize as tax exempt organizations. Churches had always been tax exempt, but now they could offer their congregations tax deductions for tithes and offerings. It was senator Lyndon Baines Johnson who pushed for the churches to be added to the section 501c3 of the tax code. For a 501c3churchtoopenlyspeakout or organize in opposition to anything that the government declares legal even if it is completely immoral.
The church will jeopardize its tax exempt status. The 501c3 has had a chilling effect upon the free speech rights of the church. Another reason for the demise of the protestant churches in America was that church pulpits and leadership had been infiltrated and subverted by freemasons and Jesuit coagitors. It was at this time, the late fifties early sixties, that the second Vatican Council met and set new goals for achieving old purposes.
Speaker 4: Vatican 2 fits right in harmony with the Council of Trent, because what you have is at Trent, the Catholic Church said, We will not compromise with Protestantism. And so between Trent in the 15 forties and Vatican 2 from 1958 to 1963, you have Jesuit infiltration of all the churches so that finally, by 1958 to 1963, there's been enough enough infiltration done, and enough of the messages of those churches have been watered down. So now Rome comes in with the ecumenical movement. That's what John the 23rd did at Vatican 2. It was, let's bring all the churches together now, but it's not under Protestantism.
It's not under biblical
Speaker 0: truth and principle. It's under Rome, and
Speaker 4: it's under Roman Roman authority. That's all Vatican 2 was. So Vatican 2 fits right in harmony with, Alberto Rivera and his statement that all the churches, by 1981, were completely taken over.
Speaker 0: What is the ultimate goal of the papacy? What is it that has not changed since the meetings in Vienna, Verona, and Sherry in the early 1800? The answer is domination of the world. The Vatican is seeking to create a one world government or new world order. And what will be the capital of this world government?
Not Rome, but Jerusalem. In 1993, the Italian
Speaker 3: capital back. The crusades haven't ended. They've they've done this before. It's not a new phenomenon here. What the Vatican wants is Rome is their second capital.
They want a crusade to liberate what they view as their actual physical capital, and that's where they don't want Jews in Jerusalem.
Speaker 2: What they were trying to do with this war now is take an eraser to all of these countries. Right? Now you have no more countries. One massive trading block. Right?
In the middle of this, you've got a city that is revered big time. The papacy has wanted to move from Rome to Jerusalem ever since the fir very first crusade. They still wanna do that.
Speaker 3: And how do we know this? We know this because, a person named, Mark Halter, the French intellectual friend of Jim on Paris, gave an interview in the magazine, Israeli magazine, Shishi, where he said, in May of 1990 3, I delivered a letter to the pope.
Speaker 0: He left Paris,
Speaker 3: promising the Vatican, East Jerusalem. And, he gave a few details. East Jerusalem would be policed by the UN. The Vatican would get to call all holy sites of all religions and, the PLO would get a a state within this end state. The Vatican, gets to hold these sites, and the UN gets to place the place.
And now we've got 2 magazine confirmations. And Erek had agreed to this. According to the staff, 3 days before the signing of the Declaration of Principles, Erek had agreed to the deal, and then when he didn't get the deal, the tariffs started, in earnest.
Speaker 0: If you do not bow down to the Jesuit controlled Roman Catholic leader, you are a heretic and you must die. These are the words of the celebrated Saint Thomas Aquinas. On the part of the church, however, there is mercy, which looks to the conversion of the wanderer. Wherefore, she condemns not at once, but after the first and second admonition, as the apostle directs. After that, if he is yet stubborn, the church no longer hoping for his conversion looks to the salvation of others by excommunicating him, and separating him from the church, and furthermore, delivers him to the secular tribunal to be exterminated thereby from the world by death.
During the Chinooki trial, Abraham Lincoln put Bishop Foley on the stand. The Bishop was forced to admit that Saint Thomas was looked upon as one of the highest authorities. In fact, the Roman Catholic Bishop swore that God himself had inspired what Saint Thomas had written about the manner in which heretics should be treated by the Roman Catholics. If the Vatican has its way, the future for all who speak out against the pope or who do not go along with the goals of the Jesuits is one of torture and death. This has been the fate of many world leaders, including presidents in the United States.
It has also been the fate of others in all walks of life, like Confederate General Stonewall Jackson, those against the central bank on the Titanic, ex Jesuit Alberto Rivera. In the Jesuit oath, the Jesuits states, I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly against all heretics, protestants, and liberals as I am directed to do to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth. In light of all that has been exposed in this documentary, what is to be done? 1st and foremost, Christians should seek the Lord's guidance through daily prayer and bible study. We should pray for a new reformation, not a false revival, nor one that piggybacks on a political movement, or even one that tries to take control of the existing antichrist, Republican, and Democrat parties.
But rather a reformation that emphasizes the God of the bible. A bible based on the Textus Receptus, like the King James version. Secondly, the Bible tells Christians to separate ourselves from evil. Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers. And in the same chapter, verse 17.
Wherefore, come out from among them and be ye separate, say of the Lord. We should seek for a peaceful separation or secession from the American empire.
Speaker 1: We wanna go back to a typical constitutional Protestant form of government that was isolationist. We kept our noses out of the businesses of other nations, and we sought to develop our own country. George Bush has called the United States Constitution a GED piece of paper, and he's called this present war a crusade, which it is. So it's all the more reason to secede. We're never going to get any relief.
We need to have a move in every state for secession, or we can begin to withdraw from roaming the Potomac, which is Washington, and we can reestablish state national government once again and begin to govern our own affairs for what's best for that population or those populations in those states. And if we wish, we can then confederate together with other states, but we don't have to.
Speaker 0: Christians should not only avoid the poisons of this world, but also the false churches in the land. We should attend bible believing churches that are not incorporated and thus controlled by the government. If you cannot find a bible believing congregation in your area, start a house church yourself with your family or with other people in your community. Christians should shine light on the evil we see and speak out against it. In Ephesians, we read and have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.
Do not be timid, but speak out about what is clearly unbiblical and evil in this country. And finally, be aware of deceivers and deceptions. Jesus warned of false prophets with lying tongues. In Matthew 24 verse 11, we read, and many false prophets shall rise and shall deceive many. In 1 Timothy, the apostle Paul wrote.
Now the spirit speaketh expressly that in the latter times, some shall depart from the faith. Giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils. As we move closer to the second coming of Christ, we should be vigilant and hold steadfast to the true faith as found in the scriptures, leaning on the holy spirit to empower us against false doctrine and wicked men. God's word does not tell us to make war on other countries to bring them democracy, or to do nation building. These lies need to be denounced.
The Jesuits will not stop in their quest for world dominion and the setting up of a new world order. Christians are to resist this antichrist system and be the light of the world. As the light shines, it reveals the truth. And the dark creatures of this world retreat from it.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
THIS IS AN IMPORTANT VIDEO! THEY TRY TO HIDE THIS STUFF FROM THE PEOPLE! https://t.co/Zmc4V5y5Ow
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses various topics related to health and wellness. They mention that all planets make noise and that when a piano was invented, it was tuned to match the Hertz rates of the planets. The speaker also talks about a deworming program they have developed to address health issues caused by parasites. They mention that all diseases are caused by parasites and that food, particularly vegetables, can contain parasite eggs. They also discuss the suppression of information about parasites in human tissue and the importance of colloids for health. The speaker briefly mentions other topics such as age regression, time travel, and a gasoline device that doubles gas mileage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I found out that all the planets that revolve around the sun are making noise. They're singing to each other. They're making noise. And then I found out that, miraculously, when a piano was invented, they didn't even know about some of the planets. But when they tuned that piano, they matched all the Hertz rates and all the notes to all the planets and they got them all right.
And they didn't have to tune a piano that way. Crazy Otto, out of Germany, played beautiful music, and he used an untuned grand piano to play his music. So they didn't have to tune the piano that way, they did. That to me was a miracle. And so, we decided to use the chord of b flat because that's the way the planet wain water.
And we said it to the kids that work in our lab. And, you know, they quit listening to wild music. And now, they're starting to listen to country and western and some classical. Uh-huh. I I believe that what you're doing, you're on the right track, because all our kids are desperately looking for the musical notes that they're missing, and so they're listening to this wild, insane, out of control music.
So we're putting it into the water. So we've put together a program. I've put together a program. I have picked several deworming companies because we found out that other scientists have stated that all cancer is caused by parasites of one sort or another. All disease is caused by the same way.
Now when you eat food, you take on the eggs. You just do. They're in all vegetables. All of them. Through the process of osmosis, when all those parasite eggs are in the soil and you water the garden, the eggs get into the into the plant through the process of osmosis, and you consume them when you eat a salad.
The reason they hatch is because when they make salad dressing, they use propa alcohol, food grade propa alcohol. They wash the huge tank out today, and tomorrow, they make honey mustard. And they don't clean the propa alcohol out of the tank properly. And so they mix the new salad dressing with propa alcohol. That breaks down the shell of the egg and what gets in your gut attaches.
Now, it gets into your bloodstream because it's a really, really small little organism, and it's got a problem. There are these things called t cells, gonna devour them. And this one little bug had a friend, Pete, and he's already in that t cell screaming for his life. I mean, I can imagine the the terror. And for some reason, your as an example, your pancreas houses wood alcohol.
When it houses wood is houses wood alcohol. When it houses wood alcohol to save you from it, that little parasite can feel the vibration and goes there for safety kinds of others get in there and they have a great time. And they drop their feces in there and they kinds of others get in there, and they have a great time, and they drop their feces in there. The feces attracts another virus that lives in it and mold, which grows a little to miniature mushrooms. And as a result, your children are born, or you get later diabetes.
And so we put a program together, and I've got 100 of diabetics that are no longer diabetics. It takes somewhere between 6 weeks 3 months. And up to this point, I've only had 2 failures in 5 years. 2 failures in 5 years, and I'm more still working with both of them. And I tell you, it's a deworming program.
When they get into your thymus, do you know what happens? Your thymus starts to shut down. It it it disturbs the quantity and quality of acid in your stomach. And as a result of that, you come down with Epstein Barr chronic fatigue syndrome or can candida. The mold now grows in your stomach because the acid isn't strong enough kill it.
And so the fruits you eat, here you've got a new pro problem. You're developing warts and all kinds of other things, and it's a mold problem. When you've got flukes in your thymus, you develop chronic fatigue in Epstein Barr. All you need is a deworming program to shut it down. These folks and the folks in the back have a deworming program that we've done tests on.
I do not make money on it. I do not sell it. It's a freedom of speech issue. All I sell are the support things around it. And I tell you folks, we've tried to get the program things that you can do to And you can get your health back.
And there are all kinds of things I've discovered that go with this. There's, eye drops for those people that can't read and need glasses. If you get yourself, a small amount of clarvastan, which is an eye drop, and I think they've got some over there, you wind up rebuilding your eyeballs. I went to a man who needed deworming badly because he had bad breath, and he is an eye specialist. And he just laughed at me until he was doing an exam in the state that I live in on a woman and a worm swam through.
These parasites are do not stay in one spot. They travel all over. They're small. They're microscopic. And you know what?
Just in the tapeworm variety, there are 700 varieties. Just in that one grouping. If you're loaded with parasites, you're gonna go bald because certain parasites get into your scalp. And there, they shut down the the hair follicles with their feces. And folks, when I dewormed, that's how I grew this hair back.
You know how many men have grown their hair back because they dewormed and now they're doing their stuff? You'd just be amazed. The hair just starts to grow back. Epstein bar oh, children's eye infections, a couple drops of that water in the eyes and the pink eye vanishes. You can time it in 6 hours.
You can time it. Chronic ear infections in children. They've had infections in there for a whole year. 8 ounces of that water, a little bit of a deworming program. And within 2 or 3 days, the whole year infection clears up and they do not come back.
I'm telling you, folks, this is big stuff. And now, the FDA is on to us. They now know what the water will do. They now know what all this stuff is due. So they're prescriptionalizing everything.
You will not be able to buy. You will not be able to hear me probably after February 13th or so or March 4th 15th this year, nobody will be able to stand up here and talk like I'm talking right now because the FDA is shutting it all down with a new program they put in motion that is a labeling issue, and they're taking all colloids off the market. So we're dropping it into drinking water standards. That means I can sell drinking water. You'll still be able to buy the product, but I will never again be able to stand up and talk about it.
Communism is here. Amen. We have not done anything about it. And if you want to do something about it, you better start doing something now, because this is a major issue. This means you cannot go to the health food store and read a damn thing about what you're buying.
Nothing. You can't read about it. You can't walk in and buy colloidal silver in a store that's that does wonders for you. And the way they put it down, some 75 year old woman, when she was 13 years old, said she drank some colloidal silver and turned blue. No one in the history of anything has ever turned blue from it.
A few of them, when they were drinking, a poison, which wasn't colloidal silver, it was, silver nitrate, they turned gray. But the point is, is they're not the FDA doesn't care. They've got you where they want you. You're not doing anything, and so they're shutting everything down. I've done the absolute best I can, folks.
And I tell you right now, I can get your health back. So we've got other things to show you in the future. And when I come back, all you'll be able to see is me getting younger and younger and younger. I'm going back to 37. I was gonna go to 28 or 29, but then I met a couple 29 year olds.
So that did that. Actually, I had a lengthy conversation with him. Oh, wow. So 30 7, 38, 39 it is for me. And that's where I'm going back.
And I wanna tell you something, there's things around like this. This is called human growth hormone. And I found out if you put this with colostrum, which we also have, and you hook this up with your deworming program, this is an age regression program, guaranteed. It works. We have some of this from a German man who made this stuff, who owns the largest pharmaceutical company in the world.
He's now 80, and he's dying. So he put the whole pharmaceutical company into work, and he made this stuff. It's not marketed. I'm the only guy with it. It's called human growth hormone boost.
It comes in a little tiny bottle for $28. And, boy, does it work. Now I don't know how long it's gonna be really good. And I don't know how long the people are gonna be able to get it into this country, probably another month or some blessed thing. But it has, I understand, a 9 year shelf life.
And we're getting some of it in. It's not gonna last long. If you want some of it to try it, you can get a little bottle of it for, or give your name and what have you. We can supply if you if you can't get it. I think we got some bottles around here somewhere.
Have you got any over there? Human growth hormone? Quite yet. Not quite yet. Well, I know there's some upstairs.
The point is is just leave your name and your phone number, and he'd be able to get you a little bottle of it for you to try. It'll blow you out of the water. You combine it with some colostrum and combine it with this program, and it will make you younger. It'll get rid of the wrinkles on your face. It'll make you bright and vibrant.
Has anybody seen me the last time I talked? Anybody seen me? How am I looking? Younger. Much younger.
See? I'm telling you, folks. I'm going back to 37, and that's all there's to it. There's some side effects I have to warn you about, you men. You're nice and comfortable with the fact that you don't have to perform all the time?
Well It's back. It's back. And it's not good. I wish it would go away. I really do.
Just just relax. Just relax. When I say so, not when you say so. You know, that's but this doesn't work. And I've forgotten about that.
I really did. I forgot about it. And and we've we've found out that we can do this. We can make you younger, make you vibrant, make you happy, make you healthy. There's all kinds of other little things.
There's a substance, an ancient remedy called Lugol's iodine. Anybody heard of it? You know? Okay. We have some over here.
Here's the issue. If you're not allergic to iodine, if you can eat shellfish, you're okay. And and shrimp or crab or whatever, you're not allergic to to iodine, you can handle this. Six little drops in 8 ounces of water, 3 times a day for 3 days, knocks out candida every time. If you're in bed laying down there with candida, damn it, it's because these critters are growing in your stomach and spreading through your system.
Candida is knocked out with Lugol's iodine in 3 to 4 days. Then you can stop using it for a while. There's all kinds of little little tricks and things. And I'm gonna be over here. I can do a few readings and things.
And, for my, workshop, I gotta find out when it is. I don't even know when it is. I'm going to do this one more time. I'm going to teach people how to go to god's banquet table. Now look, folks.
If you're religious and you're a Christian, it's okay. So am I. But I just do things a little Okay? That's kind of a whining for the Christians. It's alright.
I love you anyway. Just, I've had some trouble with this. The last time I taught everybody how to go to God's banquet table, I learned that from the from the American native heritage that I'm part of, you know. And we've been at it longer than you have, you know. And, give me a break.
Don't get on the radio and rant and rave about me and my water is the devil and all this stuff, please. Don't do that. I don't do that to you. So if you wanna come to the the little meeting with an open mind, and you wanna learn to go to God's banquet table, I'll teach that. It's a step by step program.
And the last time I did, what, 300 people, 2 of you actually wrote back and said you made it. 2 of you. So that means it's worth doing it again because it's one ripping experience, I'm gonna tell you. When you get to go, wow. Especially first time.
And you look down and see the earth way down there, you know that you've kind of stepped out of this place. And it's a real fabulous feeling of of accomplishment. And then, when you discover that, at the banquet table, the stuff comes up to you and performs into reality, and you see you can get schematics, you can get mathematical equations. I've solved problems for scientists that had terrible problems, and I solved them in 2 nights. Took me that long to keep, because I don't I can't remember everything I see.
So I gotta come back, and then I gotta go again and get some more information. But you know, this all the information of the world is there. Every bit of information you need is there. And, get healthy, be happy, and let's, get young. And let's get rid of all our diseases and all our problems, and, get on with this thing.
And the very last thing I have to say is that, Nikola Tesla everybody here heard of Nikola Tesla? I'm sure. Okay? Nikola Tesla built 3 devices that were part of time travel. The first one was the which Likowski sort of perfected.
There is another device that goes with the Likowski multi wave oscillator that was never known. I know what the device is. I built it, and it works. That is out of body when you want to experience to travel. That's what it is.
It is you if you've got a multiwave oscillator, even a homemade one, I can teach you how to make it work. Because you have to build another little device. It's pretty simple. Come to me. I'll I'll tell you what it is.
But a multiwave oscillator is you stepping out of body to travel. Out of body experience at will. This is no accident. The second device was interdimensional. That means you can take the body with you to other planets and other places.
Little risky. Gotta know what you're doing. And the 3rd dimensional travel issue was, time in 3rd dimension, which our government's been playing with for years. And they've done some pretty dastardly things with it. I'm not into that.
But I was told, not too long ago that if I wanted, I could find the equipment. I have found it. It's on its way. I bought it. I own Nikola Tesla's original second device.
That takes us to another planet. So, we're kind of that far. And, I'll be talking about that some more during my workshop. I'll explain it. And maybe I'll have them fax some pictures of it over here, so I can show it to you, let you see what it looks like.
It's quite a massive device. It uses a 1,500,000 volts of power to run. It's a pretty dramatic instrument, And it's all original, and it's in working condition. And I've got it. It's in, it's being shipped.
And it should be at this place I built when I get home. So, I hope I've made some sense here for you. I tell you, there's great hope. There's, lots of stuff you can do for your health. You can get better.
We've got a fabulous deworming program. We've got fantastic water. There's, there's a tape over there that you can get a hold of and watch. And there's people, I believe, on the tape that stand up and tell you what they had and what they did and how they handled it and got rid of it and did all this stuff. Oh, I still got 10 minutes.
Alright. When, when these issues basically started to develop and be crushed was in the twenties. It happened with the, folks that were doing, veterinarian work. They started to look at the tissue of animals, and they found out that the tissue of animals is actually full of parasites. So if you're eating medium rare, medium rare, or raw meat?
You got loads of parasites in you. Loads of them. In the in medium, medium rare and rare meat, we find actual living hatched critters that are running around. They're already hatched. And it's in all meat.
It's in chicken, pork, beef, sheep, goats, the whole 9 yards. The time that it really started to be suppressed when they wanted to use drugs for disease was in the twenties. The veterinarian group found these critters, and they went to the, hospital and asked for some tissue samples of humans, which they were given. And they found all the critters in human tissue. All the critters from those meat varieties were in the tissue.
When they wrote a book about it, the church got involved. And the church stood up and said, Look, we don't care if the critter looks the same as it is in an animal, pees the same, runs the same, breeds the same, wiggles the same. We don't care. Man is not an animal. He is a godly being, and so those parasites are not animal parasites.
They're human parasites, and they have to be dealt differently. We're not hooking man up with any animal with a parasite problem. And lots of, stuff came out in the twenties thirties that we picked up on that issue. All those books were suppressed, and now you can't find them. I'm finding them in old doctors' libraries.
Doctors that are retired have those books. I got 4 of them. There's 7 of them. There's 2 I don't have. I'm still looking.
You don't wanna see these books. I can't look at some of the stuff because they drew them in actual size in color. They drew them in color. One page is the critter. The next page is the prescription or the or the herbs or the drug that would kill those critters.
And all of that work was done. It was done in the twenties, and then it was suppressed. It was kept even from the young men that are becoming I think, trip of becoming a doctor, and that's that. So, they don't they don't even think it happens. And and, you know, they don't think they have a nutrient problem.
We've got colloidal this, colloidal that, colloidal minerals. We got all kinds of stuff for you to get you better. Doctors don't think that they have a problem, and that's why they die at what? 58? That's their lifespan.
While dead doctors don't lie, you know, they're dead. And, there's a man that that, created a tape called dead doctors don't lie. And he's right. They don't. They're dead.
They starved to death. They got old. They refused to feed their bodies the nutrient values you need. And the more fertilizers they use and the more craziness that they use in the soil, the more stuff that they do, the less nutrient value is in that food. The less colloids are in that food for you to utilize.
So you need to supplement your stuff and you need to do it with colloids. Believe me, folks. The whole trick is in colloids. And that research was done in Rockefeller Center in the thirties where they used just colloids to bring back to life dead flowers. Dead flowers dried.
They sprayed colloids on them, and even the petals came to life. So the secret is in colloids. Every single thing you need, everything you need, your body has to turn into a colloid. Every bit of food you eat, your body eat, your body can't use it unless it turns it into a colloid. And if it can't, it's waste.
And with all the drugs and the chemicals in all our foods, what we're running into plant now gets into your body and drags your vibration down, sets up a vibratory rate in your body that parasites do extremely well in. And that's what the problem is. We need to clean up. We need to do it. We need to flush the body out with some stuff that's actually gonna work.
And we need to handle disease desperately. We need to get on it. There's all kinds of things happening on this planet that are, not so good. And it's being caused by filth. All you have to do is do what I do, fly all over the country and have a look at the air.
I was going into Denver, and the pilot came on and said, it's an absolute beautiful day. Not a cloud in the sky, and it's sun shining, and we're at 6,000 feet. And we'll be in Denver for you right on time. And guess what? We couldn't see the ground from the smog.
On that day, the air was still, and we could not see the ground from this for the smog. We were 6,000 feet. And yet, he said, there's not a cloud in the sky, and it's a beautiful day. My word. I couldn't believe it.
That's our problem. So next meeting. My gasoline device is finished, ready for your cars, doubles your gas mileage. Okay? That's my next invention.
It's all finished, ready to go. And if I'm invited to the next do, I'm gonna bring the 2nd dimensional time unit. I'm gonna actually bring it, and set it up, and make it work. And show it to you. Okay?
So that's the way it's going. And I imagine after February, March, April, we won't be able to talk this way anymore. We won't be able to mention parasites. We won't be able to to mention anything. And, you're on your own after that.
Okay? So this is Wayne Rowland bidding you goodbye. And all we got left is a gas device. And how long will I be able to talk about that? I don't know.
At least we'll be rid of the FDA. Thank you, folks. Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Wayne.
And, his
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU BELIEVE THE VATICAN CONTROLS THE WORLD? https://t.co/7E9rLmOBUX
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Vatican is believed to have significant influence globally as the largest stockholder and property owner not subject to taxes. There is mention of a secretive organization called the solidarity, a 2000-year-old club meeting in the Vatican catacombs. The Vatican is seen as a powerful entity controlling much of the world's affairs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does the Vatican run the world? Figure this out. Most people don't digest this. They're the largest single stockholder in the world. They own the most property in the world that pays no taxes.
Every school, every Celtic church. I mean, there's an organization a lot deeper than them called the solidarity. I'm not familiar with that. Well, nobody is solidarity. It's a 2 1000 year old club.
It's a club. It's a club. And it's in the catacombs of the Vatican. You know, the Vatican's a city where it's in itself. I know.
I used to live right next to it. Oh, okay. Yeah. Then you know. I mean, I don't know where that Most people don't know it, but I'm telling you.
So they meet down there, you're saying? They they're not judge where they are. They only meet there, period. Right. Okay.
They're very high level profile people throughout the world. You can't invite it to be in it. Who's running the world? I think they are. Wow.
When you think of what they control and what they do, they they it's it's amazing.
@RyLiberty - Ryan Dawson
Another reason not to listen to Popes https://t.co/QwdfJ9dkkc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Arabs translated Aristotle into Arabic. When the Spanish conquered Spain, the popes ordered the burning of books, but Benedictine and Dominican monks secretly saved them in underground libraries. A human card catalog helped identify books to be burned, while the monks preserved them by translating into Greek and Latin, saving works by Plato and Aristotle from destruction by Christians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the Arabs had idiomatically translated Aristotle into Arabic. When the Spanish were conquering Spain from the Muslims, they kept encountering libraries. The popes kept issuing edicts to burn all the books, just like when they had burnt the great library and just when they shut down the academy of Athens. They wanted to continue this. The thinking went, you only need one book.
It's the bible. Why are we doing the science stuff? We don't need this. Well, the monks who were set as who were ordered to destroy the books were the Benedictines and the Dominican monks. The Benedictines and the Dominican monks didn't obey the order.
What they did was they dug giant underground libraries beneath their monasteries. When they would show up to the place with the Muslim library that they had to burn, they would read they would have a guy read they had a guy who would stand here and they have the book. They would turn the book so it was facing him so he could read it. It was a human card catalog. He knew the list, the names of all the books they had in their secret underground library.
So as you would walk by, he'd read it. If you recognize the book, he'd give you one signal and you dump it in a pile in the middle of the town. He give if he didn't recognize it, he give you another signal and you'd walk over to a cart where they had a hidden panel, and you'd slide the book into that, and then you'd walk back and you'd go grab another book, and then you'd carry it so that that guy could read it, and then, oh, that one goes in this pile. And then afterwards, they'd set that pile on fire so they could show everybody they were burning the books, and then they'd sneak the other books into their underground library, where they were busy translating it from Arabic into ancient Greek and Latin. And that's how we have Plato and Aristotle.
We would have lost it all because Christians were going around burning everything.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DOES FREEMASONS REALLY THINK THAT THEY CAN BECOME THEIR OWN GODS? https://t.co/3SXosvMHch
Video Transcript AI Summary
The New Age movement, influenced by Freemasonry, views Christianity as an enemy to be ridiculed and even murdered. Initiates are asked to commit extreme acts without morality for the Brotherhood's benefit. This disregard for life was predicted in the New Testament. The New World Order will arrive amidst bloodshed.
Translation: The New Age movement, influenced by Freemasonry, sees Christianity as an enemy to be ridiculed and even killed. Initiates are asked to commit extreme acts without moral considerations for the Brotherhood's benefit. This disregard for life was predicted in the New Testament. The New World Order will come amidst bloodshed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tex Mars, an author who has written in opposition to the new age, wrote this about their hatred of the Christians. Quote, the new age believers told, you could be a god in the next instant if only those horrible Christians weren't around with their poisonous attitudes, unquote. That thought was illustrated by another of the important new agers, David Spangler, who wrote this in his book entitled Reflections on the Christ. Quote, we can take all the scriptures and all the teachings and all the tablets and all the laws and all the marshmallows and have a jolly good bonfire and marshmallow roast because that is all they are worth, unquote. So the new age, like the Masons, feel that Christianity is the enemy, a force to be countered, not by open debate, but by contempt and ridicule, and as shall be illustrated later by even murder.
And remember, the source of the New Age movement is the order of the Freemasons. Of an oath that these initiates take somewhere along the road to the pinnacle inside the secret society was given in a book written by George Orwell entitled 1984. Mister Orwell has an initiate into a secret society called the Brotherhood in his story asked these questions. Quote, are you prepared to give your life? Are you prepared to commit murder?
Are you prepared to commit acts of sabotage which may cause the death of hundreds of innocent people? Are you prepared to betray your country to foreign powers? Are you prepared to cheat, to forge, to blackmail, to corrupt the minds of children, to distribute habit forming drugs, to encourage prostitution, to disseminate venereal diseases, to do anything which is likely to cause demoralization and weaken the power of the people? Are you prepared to commit suicide if and when we order you to do so? This, folks, is an example of the philosophy that the ends justify the means.
The initiate should do as he was required as long as the act benefited the brotherhood. There is no morality under such an oath. So murder of the unfit those unwilling to adopt the new religion will be acceptable, and those who do the annihilating are to feel no remorse. In the view of the new age religion, the murderers have served mankind well. But this callous disregard for the right to life of every human on the face of the earth has been predicted before in the New Testament.
John was moved to write in John chapter 6 verse 12. Quote, yay, the time cometh that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God's service, unquote. The New World Order, ladies and gentlemen, will sail in on a sea of blood.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Freemasons have infiltrated the churches https://t.co/zGN34JBWPf
Video Transcript AI Summary
Freemasonry and the Illuminati are forms of satanic worship. Freemasons have infiltrated the church and placed their own people in leadership positions. These individuals appear as lambs on the outside but are vicious wolves on the inside. Jesus Christ of Nazareth is the only role model to follow.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Freemasonry is satanic worship, Illuminati is satanic worship. The church is infiltrated by freemason. Satan worship his people. And they have placed their own people in leadership roles in the church, dressed from outside like a lamb, but from inside they are vicious wolves. You wanna have a role model?
My son and daughter, Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WHAT’S HIDDEN BENEATH THE VATICAN? https://t.co/cSNELxJQJK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Exploring beneath the Vatican reveals rooms filled with pagan idols and imagery, raising questions about the church's true nature. In one mausoleum, offerings to the dead were made, while another room displays a vase featuring Medusa. The presence of Roman deities, including a depiction of Lucifer, suggests a contradiction to the Vatican's Christian identity. Despite claims of preserving art, the existence of these images indicates a deeper issue, leading to the conclusion that the Vatican may represent an apostate church. This prompts a call for reflection among Catholics about the true nature of their faith and the church's practices, urging them to consider the implications of these findings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're gonna find out if the devil is at the Vatican is take a tour underneath the Vatican. As we arrive underneath the Vatican, we see that it's laid out in a number of rooms, marked by letters, as we can see in this aerial view map. Now we will be exploring some of the rooms in this map. Let's start off by looking in room c here. As we look into the room, we see that this is a mausoleum of Lucius Tullius Zethas.
The Vatican goes on and explains that this room was used for offerings to the dead. We read, view of the North Wall and Mosaic Floor. In the corners of the mosaic floor, there are 8 marble squares with circular holes through which offerings to the dead were poured during the funeral rites carried out in the burial chamber. So here we have a room where offerings are done to the dead. That's pretty common in Catholicism.
Now, if we look in the next room, room E. So here in this room, they have a vase, which has the image of a Medusa. So here underneath the Vatican, we have a Medusa. And we ask ourselves the question, this is a vase, yet it's kept underneath the Vatican. This could have easily been removed.
If the Vatican was a holy church, you would think that they would have done this. You think underneath the Vatican, they would have things that are sacred to Christ and not foreign gods, not idols and images of foreign gods. Now, as we move down further to room h, here we see that this is the mausoleum that is one of the largest and most luxurious mausoleums underneath the Vatican of Saint Peter's Basilica. It says that it was built at the beginning of the second half of the second century, during the reign of Emperor Marcus Aurelius, and belonging to a freedman of the important Valeri family. And as we're in this mausoleum, we see that there's lots of idols from the old Roman Empire.
We ask ourselves, why does Rome keep these idols down underneath Saint Peter's Basilica? You would think if they were Christians, they would want to clean all this out. I can't imagine anybody who has a true church would keep idols in their churches, especially pagan idols, left over from a bygone pagan era. But here we have the Vatican keeping many pagan idols underneath Saint Peter's Basilica. Here is an idol the Vatican is displaying of a head of a child in gilded stucco and a lock of a hair typical of 1 initiated into the cult of Isis.
And this particular idol is an idol of a boy who was initiated into the cult of Isis. If we look in this room, we see that some of the stucco decorating the walls. Here we have a personification of Oceanus. You remember the New Testament book of Revelation says that a beast comes out of the ocean. So we say, why is the Vatican having these foreign gods underneath its basilica?
Why is it protecting them? If it was a true church, it couldn't be doing it for the sake of art, especially with all the evil things that are happening in the Vatican. And as the priest earlier said that evil does exist, the devil is real, as he admitted. But the hypocrisy of all of this is that they have all these evil images and idols underneath the Vatican of Saint Peter's Basilica. We also see 2 figures of genuses with bat wings also portrayed on the walls.
Again, this is supposed to be a holy church and a holy place. Now, this is supposedly all there for many, many years. As we move into the next room, room I, the details of the mosaic floor, with Mercury and Pluto's chariot, they go on and explain that this theme is an explicit reference to the overcoming of death and the return of the afterlife. They describe it as a splendid mosaic floor of Mercury is depicted carrying a a ceduceus with wings at his ankles, walking in front, and a chariot carrying Pluto and his wife, Persephone. So here we have all these Roman gods underneath the Vatican.
Images of foreign gods. Well, as we move to the next room, we find out why they keep all these idols down there in these images. As we move to room u, here we find the shock of all shocks. Here on the wall, it says there is a depiction of Lucifer, that is, the light bearer, the morning star. On the opposite of the wall, there is a drawing of Vesper, the evening star, cosmic symbol of the human life cycle.
We find out that when you get to room u, here we have a clear depiction of Lucifer underneath the Vatican at Saint Peter's Basilica. We ask ourselves, why are they keeping this image of Lucifer underneath the Vatican? Again, you would think if you're a Christian church, you would not wanna have any of these images. Now, we know that they'll go on and say, oh, well, we're saving it because it's a UNESCO heritage site, or something like that. This is always their excuse.
Saving it for the sake of art. But for the true Christian, this is not an excuse because we know, if you're giving glory and propaganda to false deities and false pagan Gods, what are you doing? You're in essence, supporting the evil spiritual realm. This cannot be from God. And since Rome claims itself to be the one true church, you would think they would lead by example.
But what kind of example is this? That you have a depiction of Lucifer underneath the Vatican for countless 100 and 100 of years? Now this image here underneath the Vatican has been there since their claim, which would be Constantine. We would know that he was the first one that built this, basilica. And so again, we ask ourselves, why are they keeping this depiction of Lucifer underneath the Vatican?
Well, we think the answer for why all these images, idols are kept underneath the Vatican, is because what we're dealing with here, is we're dealing with an apostate church that has always been apostate, and even now, as it is filled with freemasons, and so we know that the reason why they're keeping all this there now, and they're actually revealing this on their internet website, is because they want people to see this. They want people to see what they're really all about. For the masses who believe that Rome is still a pure church, they don't mind deceiving them into believing that they are still a Christian church. As you go down underneath the Vatican, down into the next rooms, they will try to convince you on this tour that you take, that Peter is buried down there in one of the rooms, and that this gives credence to following the Pope. But we ask the question, why would you wanna follow a Pope who has all these evil things underneath his church?
It's very clear by this depiction of Lucifer that the devil is in the Vatican. He's hidden way down underneath the Vatican at Saint Peter's Basilica. Now if you are a Catholic and you are watching this video, we wanna encourage you to come out of that church. As you can see from these images and these idols that are kept underneath your church, We would hope that you would soberly think about these things and ask yourself the question. If my church is a true church, why is it promoting these things?
Why does it even want people to see these things? We would hope that you would hear the exhortation of Revelation 18 verse 4 where it says, and I heard another voice from heaven saying, come out of her, my people, that you may not participate in her sins and that you may not receive of her plagues. For her sins have piled up as high as heaven. And god has remembered her iniquities.
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
“Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò issued a grave warning alleging that Pope Francis is an enthusiastic Collaborator in the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset…” https://t.co/a5qbEKkrrK
Video Transcript AI Summary
**Original Language Summary:**
Secondo l'oratore, la quarta rivoluzione, guidata da Claus Schwab e dalla finanza internazionale, trova in Bergoglio non uno spettatore neutrale, ma un collaboratore zelante. Bergoglio, secondo l'oratore, abusa della sua autorità morale per sostenere la dissoluzione della società tradizionale. Mentre l'Adestra ha mantenuto la Chiesa, Bergoglio persegue la demolizione della Chiesa per sostituirla con un'organizzazione filantropica di ispirazione massonica. Questo si applica sia al mondo civile che ecclesiastico, confermando un patto criminale tra il deep state e la deep church. L'oratore ritiene che il ruolo dei Gesuiti sia stato decisivo in questa cospirazione, e non è una coincidenza che per la prima volta nella storia un religioso della Compagnia di Gesù sieda sul trono di Pietro.
**English Translation:**
According to the speaker, the fourth revolution, led by Claus Schwab and international finance, finds in Bergoglio not a neutral spectator, but a zealous collaborator. Bergoglio, according to the speaker, abuses his moral authority to support the dissolution of traditional society. While Adestra has retained the Church, Bergoglio pursues the demolition of the Church to replace it with a philanthropic organization of Masonic inspiration. This applies to both the civil and ecclesiastical world, confirming a criminal pact between the deep state and the deep church. The speaker believes that the role of the Jesuits has been decisive in this conspiracy, and it is no coincidence that for the first time in history a religious of the Society of Jesus sits on the throne of Peter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The fourth revolution terrorized by Claus Schwab and the family of international finance find in Bergoglio not a neutral spectator, which would itself already be an unheard of thing. But actually, a zealous co operative, who abuses his own moral authority in order to support Adestra, outside the Church, the project of the dissolution of traditional society. While Adinth has retained the Church, he pursues the project of the demolition of the church in order to replace her with a philanthropic organization of Masonic inspiration. And it is kinderious. This applies to both, to civil and ecclesiastical world, confirming the pactumicelli, the criminal conspiracy between the deep state and the deep church.
It seems to me that in this conspiracy the role of the Jesuit has been decisive. It is no coincidence that for the first time in history a religious of the Society of Jesus is seated on the throne of Peter.
@Jasper_Truth - Jasper Truth 🇺🇸
WAS P0PE FRANC!S EVER REALLY THE POPE? VAT!CAN BOMBSHELL EXPOSED! By the Legend Lionel Nation https://t.co/Uvol1KsnZk
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker interviews Dr. Eric Thaddeus Walters about the papacy, focusing on the transition after Pope Francis's demise. This is not Catholic bashing, but a historical news review of a quasi-governmental transition.
Walters claims Pope Benedict XVI's resignation was not a resignation, but an impeded sea, a kind of imprisonment. Benedict hinted he might be the last pope. Walters alleges Bergoglio (Pope Francis) was a usurper, and a coup d'etat occurred. Some prelates knew this, but didn't act. Benedict referred to Pope Benedict VIII in 1013, who abdicated due to force. Archbishop Gänswein implied Benedict's actions weren't what the world thinks.
There's a "fever pitch" in Italy about this. Journalist Andrea Cionci filed petitions to declare Ratzinger's death and address these matters. Canon law states there can be no more than 120 cardinal electors, but there are 135. If even one post-2013 cardinal enters the conclave, it's null and void. Only 27-28 pre-2013 cardinals are eligible. The papacy is the world's only non-hereditary, elected, absolute theocratic monarchy. The speaker inquires about the relationship between the papacy, Israel, and the Palestinians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The video you're about to see, the interview you're about to see, is in my humble opinion one of the most fascinating I have ever had the pleasure of being involved in and with. Not me, but my guest and my friend, Doctor. Eric Thaddeus Walters. A man of immune colossal knowledge, sobriety, And I use that in the the the serious tone regarding one of the most fascinating cases filled with intrigue, labyrinthine conspiracies. I mean, it is it is like like Mandelbrot's fractals.
You keep getting closer and closer and deeper and deeper, and there's more there. I wanna say one thing before we begin this. This is not in any way Catholic bashing. This is not about the theology, the the liturgy of of the of the of the faith. It has nothing to do with this.
This is the oldest, in essence, non hereditary monarchical theocracy in the history of the world. This isn't just some religious internecine battle among Catholics. This is bigger than anything you've seen. And the final word is, this goes to show you yet again, how, as is often the case, when something so great and so grand becomes made aware to the people, whether it's assassination theories or corruption, Americans and people think that there must be some tribunal that will jump in and correct it that says, hey. Wait a minute.
You can't do this. Wrong. Yet again, it goes to show you how so much can go wrong Unaffected, unavoided, unaltered. That is exactly what we're talking about. So my friend, I thank you for watching this.
Sit back and get ready for one of the most fascinating. And by the way, this a follow-up to a prior interview we did, and I'm going to have that link as well. For those of you who think you know about the papacy, or the Catholic church, or Benedict, or Bergoglio, or Ratzinger, get ready for this. Get ready to be mesmerized. The reaction to this gentleman was like nothing I have ever seen in my years.
Doctor. Eric Thaddeus Walters, professor, Maeste, the one and the only, joined us to give us a kind of a a bird's eye or or Vatican's eye view of Bergoglio prince, prince. Oh my god. Maybe that was a pun. Pope Francis' demise.
What happens next? And professor Walters, welcome back. And and I wanna just say a a preface. This is not Catholic bashing. This is not, you know, in fact, it's anything but.
This is an historical news review of the realities of a transition which affects the world and not necessarily just Catholics. So lest anyone thinks we're getting in the digs or talking about either the theology or the Eucharist or the liturgy or No, no, no, no, no. This is about a quasi, dare I say, governmental transition process. Would that be fair, Eric? This almost like quasi governmental?
Speaker 1: This is this is revolutionary. Oh, we'll we'll get to that. It's beyond that. It's this is the end of an epic.
Speaker 0: Okay. Tell us and just just one last word. Don't let me ask the question. I don't know anything. I am nascent regarding this.
Tell me what we should know, what insiders know, what, Romans know, what what your colleagues what the insiders know. Proceed, Okay.
Speaker 1: So once again, came up with a little outline. It's there's a lot to cover because I did I'm glad that the audience, the last time, enjoyed it. I personally went through all the comments and I was very appreciative of them and a lot of interesting follow-up, you know, questions that people had, So there's no way we're gonna be able to go through everything. So I'm trying to keep this limited to a few things. Maybe not to be salacious, but already off the a few interesting things that I actually did want to mention last time, but just we didn't have time.
So the premier biographer of Pope Benedict XVI, the German journalist, Peter and it's in English translation. I think the English translation is 'Final Conversations from twenty sixteen' and there's a lot of one liners and takeaways. So anyway, it's an interview format with Pope Benedict XVI, pretty much the last interview he ever gave, or at least published. One takeaway line is, the interviewer, the author Peter Seywald, asks him, and this is going on in the, what's called the, monastery Mater Ecclesiae in the Vatican Gardens overlooking Saint Peter's Basilica and the Sistine Chapel, which is where he spent the last ten years of his life. Also bear in mind, Benedict, you know, all the spin they put out immediately following his resignation his resignation, which was not a resignation as we mentioned last I explained last time.
Right. And the election of Dragojo. Part of the spin was, oh, you know, Benedict is frail, he's sick, he's ill. Well, for being so sick, frail, and ill, he spent more than half of his pontificate in an impeded sea. Nine years of that The impeded sea, again, he's a prisoner either of an external force or an internal force force, in this case, within the church itself.
Speaker 0: And and I'm sorry. Not to interrupt, but somebody might say s e e, the holy sea, the impeded sea, what is the s e e for Lenin and myself?
Speaker 1: Yeah, sure. It's where we get the English word seat from. There's a difference in Latin between a cathedra, from which we get the word cathedral, cathedra meaning the chair of the magister, the teacher in the classroom, or the magistrate in the courtroom, in this case the chair of Peter, meaning the Pope. Okay? So there's a difference though in Latin between a c s double e s e e, in Latin, seides, meaning a generic chair, could be any kind of a chair, and the cate bera is unique, specific, that chair to these these roles.
Okay. Okay. In any event, the interviewer Peter Sewald asks Pope Bennett the sixteenth, who was pope for ten years well, he used to pope for longer as an in an impeded sea as prisoner than he was actually doing pope, so much for that. Ten years he was in an impeded sea. And the interviewer asks him at a certain point, Are you going to be the last pope?
Pope Benedict the sixteenth respond quite frankly. He says, anything is possible. So that's one thing. The other thing is all
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. Not to please. Just just impeded see when when Pope Benedict Ratzinger, the this the predecessor of Bergoglio Francis impeded see, meaning you are before transition or after before. Does that mean his his papacy was illegitimate? It was a nullity.
It was vacant. It was void. It was with an asterisk so that we understand what was his status?
Speaker 1: He was was usurped. His, his throne, usurped. Mean, to
Speaker 0: put it maybe coup. It was like a like a coup d'etat sort
Speaker 1: of It's it's it's a coup d'etat, and then you have an impostor, a usurper come in to just claim that. This, you know, like, of a Shakespearean drama or tragedy or whatever. You know?
Speaker 0: So so it would be, in essence, you have this impostor who came in and told the world I am, and nobody nobody, the the the white smoke, all of that, nobody spoke up, or did they? Everybody knew this.
Speaker 1: There were high ranking prelates at the time, both bishops and cardinals, not a lot, maybe half a dozen or so, who did publicly make statements to this point and to the effect that he was usurped, he was a coup d'etat, but nothing formally on the part of those who could have and should have done something, namely the pre-twenty 13 elected cardinals. That is cardinals created by either Pope John Paul the second or, Pope Benedict the sixteenth.
Speaker 0: And, again, not to not to I'm I'm violating my own rules here. The Pope Benedict Ratzinger did not die, did not, quote, step down. Can that be done? How is how is a papacy how is the secession or the the the terminus of a of a papacy, how is that accomplished thus allowing a vacancy and then the reelection? Is that even possible?
Can you do that without a pope being dead?
Speaker 1: Well, only unless the either the pope has to die Mhmm. Or, the pope has to properly abdicate, resign the office of being pope, which in Latin is called munus, m u n u s, munus. And Benedict did not do that.
Speaker 0: Okay. Interesting. So he and and and and and again, all of this is done, and nobody is saying, hey. Wait a minute. Wait a minute here in this thing.
If if somebody tried to do that with pope or even oh, listen to me, Paul. Trump or Biden, they would have been screaming, you can't do this. It would have been constitutional scholars. It was done. Under the radar with a tacit.
Say nothing. That's the part that blows my mind and others as well. They say, Eric, this can't be. You just you just you just don't go out there and nobody in Saint Peter's Square says, hey, hold it. Not one person, nobody on television, not not our our Cardinal Dolan.
Nobody, not did did Vigano or any of the other, heretics say who complained about this?
Speaker 1: Well, those that did complain, there were very few that did it for the correct reasons. Okay? Okay. There were others, many vegano, I think, could be placed in that category that did it for seemingly other and unproductive Okay. Counterproductive and perhaps personal interest being Okay.
Speaker 0: Grudges, axes to grind, purse animus, whatever. Okay. Yeah. Okay. Forgive me.
Proceed, sir.
Speaker 1: It's okay. Okay. So, so that's one thing. Another thing is when Benedict again did the Declaratio and in the aftermath and again repeated to the journalist Peter Sewell, who I mentioned earlier, he also mentioned, if anyone vaguely recalls when this all happened in February and March of twenty thirteen, Oh, the first Pope to resign in five hundred and ninety three years was a member. No.
Benedict said that, What I'm doing has not happened in over a thousand years. And he was referring specifically to the year 10/13 and his predecessor who did abdicate, but also for forced reasons, by the Holy Roman Emperor at the time. Was in the 10/13.
Speaker 0: Wow. And who is that, Praytell?
Speaker 1: Well, rather ironically, if not providentially, Pope Benedict eighth, at the Yeah.
Speaker 0: Cue the theremin. Wow.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Okay. And then finally, in this kind of more just a salacious part, guess, if you will, archbishop Gainsfine, whom I mentioned also last time, Pope Benedict XVI's personal secretary, now Archbishop he's done a lot of public appearances. He's very careful and measured with his words, but to his credit, this last year, 2024, he was thinking about giving a conference in a church in the North Of Italy, and he said to everyone, there's a few hundred people there, I guess, in the church, that what Benedict did is not what the world thinks.
Meaning? Implied. Wow. Preside. Yeah.
Speaker 0: This cryptic these these measured, almost like read between the lines. I think we had joked about, Jeremiah Denton, the POW, who was blinking torture when he was it it's as though he's the he is the person, the woman at the door when the police officer comes, is everything alright? And they open the door and there's a chain and she's trying to say, no. Everything's fine. Everything's fine.
So there are these signals, and and and you understood it. How many of your if if I walked around with you and talked to your colleagues and friends and those in the know, how many of you would say, oh, absolutely. Of course, that is. Of of course, that's true.
Speaker 1: A lot.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: The problem is everything happened so fast. Just, I mean, warp speed, you know, to wrap your head around it and to figure out what was happening in the first place, you know, again, analytically, you know, accurately, it took a little time and it kept taking time. And then, you know, there are questions posed to Prelates, it's just they avoid it, they don't want to know, nothing to see or move along kind of thing. But now it's gotten a fever pitch in Italy.
Speaker 0: Really? Okay. Okay. That's what I wanna know. Because as you can imagine here
Speaker 1: No. It's it's fever pitch.
Speaker 0: Nobody nobody is saying, okay, wow.
Speaker 1: If you remember the Italian journalist I mentioned last time, Andrea Cionci, he's filed several petitions. He actually got he actually received in return from the Cardinal Secretary of State, Pietro Parolin, who just had, think, a heart attack a few days ago. I was very cordial thanking him for his solicitation. So there's been many petitions, etc, signed by thousands and thousands of people sent to the Secretary of State of the Vatican Holy See to address specifically all of these matters, and basically saying, You need to do what we discussed last time. You need to declare the Pope is truly dead, go into conflict with only the pre twenty thirteen cardinals, 20 seven, 20 eight.
I'll explain why there's a question mark over that number exactly in a moment. And do what you know you need to do. Again, some of the other canons I didn't we didn't go into last time also have to do with the cardinals have the obligation and duty to do this. That is, they can't just brush it under the rug. Mean, it's so
Speaker 0: And the pope is dead would be Bergoglio or No. No. Ratzinger.
Speaker 1: Ratzinger. Yeah. Bergoglio was an anti blood test. He's nothing.
Speaker 0: So so his so his death after his death and I'm I'm I'm so sorry. I'm a I'm a dunce here. But after anyway. After Ratzinger died in exile, in Elba, so to speak, after he died, you could have corrected it then by saying, alright. Let us take this, corrective measure here.
Say the pope is dead. Pick up where we left off. Even aft even after Bergoglio was already pope, could they have somehow fixed it, corrected that, that that glitch? Because they didn't. Am am I reading this right?
I mean or is that just forever?
Speaker 1: We've been stuck in this situation since 03/01/2013.
Speaker 0: '20 '20 '1, please?
Speaker 1: 2013. Wow. '21. So that's over twelve years?
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And the amount of years would not be so this may actually be the longest time that I think it is the longest time such as the collision has ever occurred. But there's been several moments, you know, in the history of the Catholic church where same or similar situations have occurred, you know, several years without Pope. Again, what makes this unique is this is the first time this was actually a successful coup d'etat color revolution within the church and a usurper cognizant of very completely knowing what they were doing.
Speaker 0: Okay. So okay. So continue. I'm sorry, sir. I'm I'm interrupting.
Speaker 1: So yep. So there's been a couple since we last, did this, which was, I guess, about a little over ten days ago. There's been a couple of developments. One is that one is not really a development, there's already a number, I didn't mention it. Under again Canon Law, Apostolic Canon Law from 1983, the Apostolic Constitution from 1996, and then including a Motu Proprio in Latin, which means in my own way, but it's like an executive order on the part of the Pope.
That was under Paul VI in 1970, I forget which specific year, Adding to establishing the number of legal, licit, legitimate cardinal electors in the College of Cardinals at 120. Can't have any more than 120. You can have as little as three, because it's just a two thirds majority required to validly or legally elect the Pope, but no more than 120. And they were always very careful since then Paul VI, 1970s, all the way through Benedict XVI, to never put in more potential cardinal electors than 120 in the cardinal
Speaker 0: And today, how many are there? How many are there?
Speaker 1: There's a problem, big problem. This by itself, by itself, again according to the Canon law, will nullify the conclave which is supposed to begin in three days.
Speaker 0: How many are there now?
Speaker 1: There's a hundred and well, there's over 200 total problems.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute.
Speaker 1: Not stop. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. Several scores several scores of which are over the age of 80, and so we know they're not going to be voting.
Okay? Okay. But there's a there's a 35 of voting age. So they're 15 over the limit. Wow.
So number one, if all a 55 go into the Sistine Chapel as per church law itself, null and void, that's number one. Number two, if even just one post 2013 cardinal, meaning card meaning a cardinal created by Bibroglio, even if just one out of a hundred and eight. So he's created a total of a hundred and eight. 70 five percent of the College of Cardinals now. Even though not one of them is a legitimate legal cardinal, and they face actual sanctions on the part of the Holy See.
Like, serious prison time, if anyone does what they're supposed to be about them.
Speaker 0: Prison?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Potentially, theoretically. Serious sanctions. Serious sanctions. I mean, they could be, you know, it could be commuted.
Speaker 0: Right. Right. You know, there's
Speaker 1: something else. But they're stripped of everything. I mean, there is plagiarization. So, among other things. So, even if just one of those 100 makes bergolian cardinals, cardinals created under the K.
A. Pope Francis, anti Pope Francis, Even if just one of them sets foot in conclave, the conclave is null and void, once again. It's an illegally legitimate conclave. It can only be the pre twenty thirteen cardinals created by popes John Paul the second and Benedict the sixteenth, of which there's 27 or 28. Why 27 or 28?
Well, this is a development that happened. And this is a real this is, you know, this is like something out of a I'm not gonna use I'm doing my best to be careful and measure here. Just imagining your favorite mafia movie. Okay. Yeah.
Right. I understand. Yeah. There's there's a card Sardinian cardinal, last name Baechu, and he was created by Bergoglio anyway in the first place. Well, he took the place of the Australian Cardinal Pell, whom Bergoglio put in charge of basically the the the new entity responsible for cleaning up your IOR.
The Vatican Bank. It's usually euphemistically referred to. Okay. Cardinal Pell, the Australian who died a few years ago, also in interesting circumstances, we'll just say. Mhmm.
Yeah. He took the place of the guy before him that was in charge of this, put in charge of this by Pope Bennett the sixteenth, Archbishop Carlo Maria de Jano. Wow. Who was doing his job and doing a good job. And that's one of the reasons well, maybe we'll come back to that.
That's one of the reasons why then he was sent as the Apostolic Moon seal to The United States in Washington, D. C, basically the Vatican and Holy Seals ambassador to The United States Of America, because they were already being forced and pressured. Hope ended the sixteenth losing a lot of support and he wiggle room, you know, he couldn't it was it was it was becoming more and more confined already. Again, is all leading up to his declaration in February of twenty thirteen. Suddenly, I just lost my own thought.
Oh, so Baekhu, this guy, after Bergolio died, I think it was right probably right the day we did the previous interview Mhmm. Or in the day after he meets with the guy that just had a heart attack a few days ago, the Cardinal Secretary of State, Parolin. Parolin gives him a handwritten letter. It was typed out, but, you know. Right.
It says basic it's a it says that this cardinal Baetzhu, who had already been relieved of command, and that for a while he was also relieved of his any cardinalatial prerogatives, but then Vergoglio reinstated them. There's a lot of backroom to be able to go on here. But he was relieved of his command from, you know, investigating the transparency and financial activities of Vatican Bank, the Yor. And so the other so the last week, he says to so Parolin shows him this letter, supposedly Bergoglio had written. It says, you're not allowed to vote in conclave.
Signed f. So not even his not even his full name, Francis, just f. F. There's no date on it.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: And this this cardinal Beech, who says to Potawatim, his witness, the other people there, says, This is not legal. This is not listed. This is not valid. I'm not respecting this. Now what are gonna do?
And now suddenly, a few days ago, Farooq just had a heart attack or severe health problem. Don't know what exactly. Wow. Yeah. That's high drama here.
Speaker 0: Now let me stop for a sec. Let me stop. Okay. The work what the only according to what you're saying, the only me stop. Only a 20 eligible cardinals are able to vote.
Now you could have more who are 90, a hundred, but you up to the age of 80, you cannot vote after 80. You can remain your cardinalship or whatever the particular now Yes.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: You you can. You can stay on. You can have 500 if you want, but only the ones after 80, you stop voting. I did not know.
Speaker 1: You you, yeah, you cannot vote.
Speaker 0: 20 were there from Ratzinger excuse me, from Benedict and then JP Deuce. Right? Those two. They're with the other one. Anyone after that, any cardinal appointed theoretically by Francis doesn't count.
So the only ones who can and you can have a minimum, we say a quorum, if you will, a minimum of three and no more than 120 voting. They could be and they can't be in the room. Correct? You can only have a 20. So let's say there's 200 total.
The the the other 80 cannot be in that conclave. It can only be a 120 bona fide certified legitimate authorized cardinals
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Who can vote. And you say right now, of that 120, there's about a 35 who are attending attempting to vote.
Speaker 1: A 35. So that's over one and twelve. 15 over the limit anyway.
Speaker 0: Right. Right.
Speaker 1: And? And moreover, 108 were all created by Virgolio. Wow. This also unprecedented in history. He's the guy that's created the most cardinals in history who are not cardinals because he was not the pope.
So but anyway.
Speaker 0: So we have 27. Right? My my math. Roughly about 27 or 28, you said, who can actually vote.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And if you walked into to to the to the and by the way, if you had in that conclave any more than that 27 or 28 who were able to vote, does that nullify the validity of the conclave as well?
Speaker 1: Out of 108 Bergolian cardinals, even if one of them sets foot in the conclave with conclave is Abenizio de facto no one's word.
Speaker 0: Right. Now if somebody if I were to ask, theoretically, everybody in Rome or anybody who is conversant with the papacy rules to say, how many of you have heard this or know this? How many people would honestly say, yep. We know all about that. We're not saying anything, but Eric Thaddeus Walters is 100% correct.
How many do you think roughly would would acknowledge this?
Speaker 1: Of those who care?
Speaker 0: Yes and no. Correct.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I would say
Speaker 0: All of them.
Speaker 1: More than more than 50%. Wow. Wow. Wow. And Okay.
The the other where the other remaining percentage of whatever that would be are what you or what some might characterize as gatekeepers, whether they're in the media.
Speaker 0: Right. Right. Right. Okay. So where do we go now?
And what happens?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the con this so I'm going I I'll keep calling it an illegitimate illegal conclave because no one's done anything yet about it, begins on this Wednesday, May 7, in the morning. And so what will happen is in St. Peter's Basilica there will be a mass and then then they will well, then they and and all the cardinals will be there present for that, so that's over 200. And then if 135 go into the Sistine Chapel, Conclave null and void, but they'll do what they usually do.
They'll do the rounds of voting called scuttingi. There's a session in the morning and a session in the afternoon, and they do that for five days in a row, and if they don't come up with anyone on the fifth day, then they take another few days off to, I don't know, get in touch with the Holy Spirit or something, and then they go back into Conclave again for more rounds of voting. Now that's not happened in, I don't remember one last time, a long time. I mean, the last several elections have been done historically relatively quickly, anywhere from one to a few days and not even a full five days. So that starts on Wednesday, Wednesday morning.
But as I said, if if those 35 just one of the Bedolian Cardinals goes in, it's another illegal and illegitimate conclave. Okay? And so whoever they know and in the meantime, there could be fireworks. In other words, it could happen in the Sistine Chapel.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: You know, a proper drop down what do you call it? Down, drag out fight.
Speaker 0: Right. Knock down, drag out. Yeah. Yep.
Speaker 1: Knock down, drag out. Yeah. You know, who knows? So Now
Speaker 0: a couple of couple of questions here. First, you mentioned before somebody could be imprisoned or who because the the the first thing, Eric, people might be saying is, oh, this is just some internecine battle of Catholics. Who cares? Doesn't affect anything. It's a bunch of people in dresses and funny hats and pink shoes and red shoes.
And so what? It's bigger than that. This is not just about a Catholic church. It is about Yeah. What would you call it?
Almost like an an it's almost like ancillary to the monarchy. It's it's Yeah. To me, there's there's no explain that significance of what the papacy means.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the papacy, to put it in, those kind of, governmental political terms, is the world's only is the world's only non hereditary, elected, absolute theocratic monarchy, the king of which is the pope.
Speaker 0: Interesting. Theocratic monarchy. Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Non hereditary, although there is nepotism, for example, the Renaissance period, the border jocks.
Speaker 0: And there's monarchical. For example, one could argue that Iran, for example, people say, that's a theocracy or something. But that's not that's that's not hereditary. That's that's that's almost dare I say, a democratic theocracy there, you're voted or voted or I
Speaker 1: lost it. This
Speaker 0: is this is a different story altogether. So that's number one. Number two, what is the judicial review, if you will, process? If the pope is infallible, the pope is like the Supreme Court, our whatever the pope says is ipso facto by its very nature, correct. End of discussion.
Do you think that anyone could could actually bring this up? Has there been any kind of a civil war or anybody who told a pope you're doing something wrong or
Speaker 1: Oh, yes. Over history. Sure. Sure.
Speaker 0: Is it successful? Is there is there a tribunal that that could
Speaker 1: over overrule both? Yeah. Some sometimes it is. Sometimes it isn't. I know I I don't wanna get too lost.
And so these are these are all important, profound, deep and fascinating, time consuming questions. That's why it's so complicated, you know, to wrap one's head around one of them. Know, most recently, it was the first Vatican Council, eighteen sixty nine-eighteen seventy, when Pope Pius IX, the Church's longest reigning Pope ever, thirty three years, it was under him that Papal States collapsed into what we know today as Vatican City State. He issued what's called the dogma of papal infallibility. When the pope speaks ex cathedra from the throne, He's infallible in matters of faith and morals.
Right. And morals is an unfortunate and really inaccurate translation from the Latin morres because morres much more encompassing. It doesn't just mean ethical behavior. Means customs and traditions and all sorts of things. And if if anyone if you're any of your audience has ever heard of Lord Dalderg Acton.
Lord Acton. I think it his an institute who's his name after him.
Speaker 0: Oh, power cops, sir.
Speaker 1: He he's the guy that, at least in the modern period, coined that phrase, all power all power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Right. He he uttered those words to Pope Pius IX's face in December of eighteen seventy, trying to get him not to make this a dogma. Now
Speaker 0: a little background. My understanding, my pedestrian understanding is that Mussolini and the Vatican under Pius XI formed some kind of an alliance, the Lateran Treaty of 1920 And Because I find this interesting, like Mussolini, also Italy is with Libya and Because we in The United States, as you know, being from here, we're used to, we've been here, we've added on, but we don't have any serious questions as to how Arizona came about or who owns So this is almost like Harry Potter ish. What's that about Mussolini and the Vatican?
Speaker 1: So, I don't want to bore people with
Speaker 0: You cannot bore anybody. It's impossible for you to bore anybody.
Speaker 1: Okay. So the Vatican is the world's oldest, continuously still surviving nation state of any kind. It was formally established in the year July between Pope Stephen the second and the barbarian chieftain of the Merovingians at the time, a guy named Peppin or Pepin the Short, not to be confused with his relative, Pepin the Fat. So the barbarian chieftain of the Merovingians, whom the pope, the previous pope, or the pope invited to invade the Italian Peninsula to subdue two other barbarian groups, the Ostrogoths and the Lombards. Okay.
They accomplished this successfully in July, and that's when the Papal States begin, the sovereign, temporal, monarchical rulers of which are the Popes. It's also when European nobility begins because for his part, the pope grants Tuppepin and his two sons, Carloman and Charlemagne, the ancient Roman legal title of nobility, Patricius Romanorum or Patrician of the Romans. So this is when European nobility begins. If you think about the battered guy in England, all that stuff, you know, the wizards, that's going to be formally begun. Always under the pope.
Not because he's not actually not specifically because he's the successor of Peach or the Vicar of Christ, but because he's also the Bolt Viex Maximus, which we can come back to either now or a later time. That's long. Anyway, so and this lasts. So the Papal States then from that point until 1870, basically covered the central third of the Italian Peninsula. Okay?
During the so called unification of Italy in the nineteenth century, so for your American listeners, while the US Civil War was going on, was a civil war going on here, referred to as the Unification of Italy. By 1870, the Papal States had been collapsed into what we know today as 44 hectares or 110 acres of land, Vatican City State. And in fact, historians refer to this period between 1870 and 1929 coming to the Lateran Treaty as the Roman question. Wow. What do we do now with this Pope thing?
Because, you know, we got a lot of Catholics running around the world. So 1929, February eleventh, the same day Benedict made his Declaratio. 02/11/1929, the Lateran Treaty is signed between Pope Pius XI and dictator of Italy at the time, Mussolini, Benito Mussolini, establishing Vatican City State with all sorts of provisions for remunerations because of the loss of tax revenue from the Papal States Mhmm. And all sorts of other legalities and just things.
Speaker 0: See, but that's fascinating because the the one thing that we know and and one of the the interesting stories which folks, I think, forget, and I am not by any stretch of the imagination, a biblical scholar or historian. But one of the problems that Jesus posed to Pontius Pilate was, Who's this guy? We don't like somebody within the confines of our jurisdictions claiming not only allegiance with a bunch of people who can turn against this and some kind of very powerful, if not supernatural. We don't care for this. So Mussolini and others had to realize we had to do something about these folks.
We have to mollify them, contain them. It's almost like containment theory, we did with NATO and Soviet Union. So that's something interesting because if anybody thinks, put it this way, there is no, and you would agree, with all due respect to our brothers and sisters who were Jews or Lutherans or Baptists, there ain't nothing like Roman Catholics. It's an army. Also, not to be parenthetically abstruse but the Jesuits are of of which I went to to a Jesuit high school and that's all I know.
From Ignatius Loyola and admirem Doria, the admirem de Iglorium and the Society of Jesus and that is something which is another another story. Black popes and it is so if if you love I don't wanna keep saying Harry Potter, but but Byzantine mystery mysterious storylines. It doesn't get better than this. There's nothing like it. Nothing.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Truth is stranger than fiction. I find anyone.
Speaker 0: So another question, Eric. By the way, dear friend, thank you for this. You. Is there any question or any suspicions as to the cause, if you will, of the death of Bergoglio? Any anybody is is was that a clean death as we say?
I
Speaker 1: think so. Yeah. I don't think there's any funny business there. There were a lot of theories and speculations going around, you know, in the months prior.
Speaker 0: If you had to if you had to handicap, if you were a betting man, is it even possible when I see CBS Morning News or somebody saying, Who's likely to be? You don't know anything about, Oh, there seems to be an unusual number of, again, is layman, African, black, nontraditional, non European, non Italian. How is that met by more of the traditional folks? And if you had to pick who would be the next pope and you were a betting man, what's the inside skinny? What does the inside line say?
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, I don't in fact, I have a I have a friend here in Rome. He's Irish. We just he he sent me the betting, you know Yeah.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: Like, patty power, that kind of thing.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Right. Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Just yesterday. The big the big front runners are two I mentioned last time. Turksen from Africa, he's from Ghana, Tagle from The Philippines, they're both Tagle is very he's the second youngest part of the period, and they're both legitimate pre 2013.
Speaker 0: Okay. Good. Good.
Speaker 1: But they're both very, you know, you the people would characterize them as being progressive, liberal, that kind of thing, among other things. I'll just leave it at that. Yeah. The other big front runners are the Secretary of State, Parolin, who just got really ill the other day. There is an American, but he's not a he's not a sitting ordinary bishop in The States.
He's actually an Curia here known. His last name is oh gosh. Let's look at my mind right now. For a couple of there were a few days where O'Malley's name of where is O'Malley in Boston? O'Malley's name and, Dolan's name were being
Speaker 0: way they're gonna pick an American. There's no way. You I mean, is that true?
Speaker 1: I have a I have a theory that could be very weird, but would still not solve the issue. But because of the geopolitics involved, I started thinking and wondering about it, and I could see where that could make sense, given what's happening on the world geopolitically now. But still, I don't think I don't really think it's
Speaker 0: There is a meme, a kind of the this memetic that's being published. And it's smoke of the rainbow color. Meaning they're laughing. The next pope is going to be another progressive. We're gonna see nuns as priests.
It's gonna be complete and total. What's what's your your take on that?
Speaker 1: Probably.
Speaker 0: Oh, no. Where is this coming from? Where is Who is behind? Oh, and one more thing. One more thing.
Did you ever hear the story? And I've heard this just maybe as a drive by. I'm hearing this that Bergoglio, Francis, every day called up the pastor or a priest a Catholic church in Gaza, which infuriated Israeli officials. There was some kind of a Have you heard about that?
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. No. That's true.
Speaker 0: What's the story behind that? And how does the Oh, and and also Bergoglio's past and juntas and death squads and living Listen, J. P. Deuce, when he was a young man, this guy, he had girlfriends, he was an actor, he probably killed people. This dude was not some monastic choir boy, from what I understand, which might be kind of good.
But how much of that affected Francis? And what's the relationship between the the the papacy and Israel, Middle East, Gaza, Palestinians, as far as you know?
Speaker 1: Very tense. No. From what I understand, Israel itself forbade any diplomats or representatives from coming to Birkoglio's funeral. Wow. You know, also people in the which is obviously a whole other issue even though it is related,
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: You know, what's happening what's happening in Palestine is a little bit you Everybody thinks, oh, they're just a bunch of nutty well, I shouldn't say nutty. They're just, you know, Muslim, Arabs, Muslim, there as well. Because
Speaker 0: Christians are under attack. Christians around the world. This is serious business. I mean, not just necessarily in the quote. Middle East has become kind of a code word for Israel or Palestine or whatever you want to call it.
But Christians, Now remember, the papacy deals not exclusively with Catholics, though that is certainly a great force of interest. But the notion of Christians under attack, there's a very serious undercurrent of problems here that the pope or the papacy should or maybe have attempted to address. Have you heard anything along those lines?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, that's you know, you can bring China into the mix because this is another big issue. Just within a couple of years after Virgilio was elected, installed, he sent yeah, it's also kinda going back to how to you know, what are some of the motivations or the factors that led to all this in the first book. So we mentioned the Sanctagalan group before. Mhmm.
Yep. The Mafia. Specifically, the now deceased Cardinal McCarrick. Yep. Yep.
And Virgilio Made McCarrick, his liaison back and forth between the Vatican and the CCP to strike a new treaty with the CCP, which has never ever been made public, which is another big problem.
Speaker 0: Problem how? How because it has been made The what what's the problem per per per se?
Speaker 1: That no one knows what's involved. No one knows what it's about.
Speaker 0: But isn't that good that they're speaking? Isn't that good that they're Sure.
Speaker 1: Sure. Of course. The prob but the problem is is number one, and it's been it's it's it was renewed in 2018. So I think that's four, five, six years after the first treaty was ratified between the two, but again, not actually because it's now in void, but whatever. Mhmm.
It was renewed again in 2018, so precisely because the contents have not been made public. Imagine The United States, you know, I don't know, the president of The United States signing a treaty with China, and they just say, don't worry about it. We're not gonna publish it. We're not gonna make it public, but, we'll take care of her.
Speaker 0: But it's a It's almost like Nancy Pelosi who said we don't know what we signed until we passed the law. Now let me ask you another stupid simple question. Out of this entire is a Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, claims to be a Catholic and has always been very, very strong. Said that
Speaker 1: He was Russian Orthodox. Was Russian
Speaker 0: Now that's the question. They said that when he was in the KGB or FSB, he put his badge away. Accepted. He was very devout. The West, say, oh no, no, no.
Even Cathcart, no, no, no, Don't believe that for a moment. I've never heard how a lot of people can look into the heart of somebody and determine the legitimacy of their transformation. What Eastern right? Eastern what does that mean?
Speaker 1: Orthodoxy?
Speaker 0: Yeah, compared to plain old Catholic. What does it mean?
Speaker 1: I mean, it's basically the same thing with the trappings are slightly different, the liturgy is slightly different, the language is different.
Speaker 0: Does the Pope You
Speaker 1: mean the Pope in Rome? Yeah. Well, that's it's a political. Over the centuries, theologians and historians, it's going to be using theology somehow to justify all this, and they can't. It's all political, and it goes all the way back to the fourth century when Constantine moved the capital of the Roman Empire from Rome to Byzantium, which he named Nova Roma, New Rome because it has to reflect Rome after his death, it was ever after remembered as Constantinople, the city of Constantine, now Istanbul.
And so it goes all the way back to then. It was a fight, a battle between the political, between Constantinople as the new capital and Rome. And all sorts of theological justifications, ecclesiological justifications have been attempted over several since. None of it works.
Speaker 0: Are they correct? Because we have, of course, Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, Eastern, Armenian. We have all of these. When I was in Jerusalem in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, which is as holy as you can get, the individuals, there was something called the status quo. It was an understanding of who ran the concession because it was not only the site of Christ's crucifixion, but his burial, his tomb, where the rock was.
And I saw people with beards and not cassocks, but vestments and hats. I'm thinking, right, who are these? I never knew the flavors and
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's like to be old.
Speaker 0: Oh, it is It's like
Speaker 1: to be old.
Speaker 0: It was interesting also, you'll get a kick out of this when the Protestants said, Hey, listen, can we get in on this? They said, Excuse me? They said, No, no. And they came up with Calvary, not Gethsemane or whatever the, I don't know, but they came up with their own version of it because you have the Coptics have the concession for this. This one's got that.
And it's almost like a, I don't wanna, please, I don't mean to be, it's almost like a food court. You know, you have different
Speaker 1: people over
Speaker 0: here and really and you have people running the show and it is as a person who was a a a retired Catholic and not in any way spiritual, there was an energy in that place.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe put
Speaker 0: on from reflected from the hearts and souls and of other people, but it was something that I shan't forget. But is is it safe to say that Vladimir Putin is a Catholic?
Speaker 1: Well, he's Russian Orthodox. So in other words, the problem So the split, split, the first, there's been two schisms, ruptures within the one Holy Catholic Apostolic Church. The first was in the year October, when the Pope at the time sent his emissary ambassador, the French Cardinal Hubert or Humbert, sounds better in French, to Constantinople to issue a papal bull of excommunication against the Patriarch of Constantinople and the Emperor of Constantinople because of the issue or an issue regarding what's called the Fediocle Clause. So Catholics who practice or whatever, when you recite the Nicene Constantinopolitan Creed, become of a certain part, we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord will give our life and proceeds from the Father and the Son. Well, that was never in the original Ecumenical Council, the First Council of Constantinople in March that issued that proclamation.
It just said ex patri or from the Father, out of the Father. And the Son part was added. Now it's a logical consequence. Theologically, there's not it's a fact, I mean, in this internal aberrant of But it was then weaponized politically. It was politicized regarding the political struggle back and forth between Rome and Constantinople so that everything came to a head in October, when this Cardinal Umberg, with the papal bull ex communication, marches into Hagia Sophia on Easter Sunday while the patriarch is about to consecrate the Eucharist Wow!
The Mass, okay, And he slams on the altar the papal bull of excommunication, and the patriarch immediately it was kind of like an F me, F you moment.
Speaker 0: Yeah, right.
Speaker 1: The patriarch issues verbally, publicly in front of everyone, Hagia, Sofia, Cathedral, Istanbul, Constant over there. We call it a double excommunication. And they immediately justified. They that both sides agreed to immediately pretend like, well, that never happened. Why?
Well, because unbeknownst to Cardinal Humbert, it took him two weeks on a boat to get from Rome to Constantinople. And in the meantime, the Pope died. Here we are. Remember that? Say that
Speaker 0: Uh-oh. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The bull of excommunication he was bringing was null and void.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: On the patriarch's part, they said they never included they excommunicated the Western church, meaning the Roman Latin church, just the Cardinal Humbert, his entourage, and the pope who was dead. So, you know, they canceled each other out. But, anyway, on a grassroots level, it was too little too light. Sorry about that.
Speaker 0: There is a there's a couple of things here. Just just in terms of the the trivia and the specifics. When I was in Catholic school, we did the sign of the cross like this, to the left and to the right. Putin and Eastern will do it the other way, right to left. That's one thing, That's like sometimes a friend of mine who is a Muslim, said, What's the difference between Shia and Sunnis?
He said this or or that. Anyway, it was something with a hand. It was a kind of an inside joke. I didn't get it. That's number one.
Number two, when you talk about Protestants, because I love to ask Protestants, what is it between you and a Catholic? What's really the difference? And they can't answer the question. And a friend of mine, one time we were at a, I mean, I've told you this, we were in a a friend awake of a friend of mine in the Catholic church and my friend who's Jewish said, you know, I've never been in a church before. I said, let me show you something.
I said, you know, you can tell if you're in a Catholic church, look at the altar. You see that cross? If Jesus is on it, it's Catholic. It's a crucifix. If Jesus is off, it's Protestant because Protestants emphasize the resurrection.
Catholics not focus on but it's the the passion of Jesus and the Christ. Stations of the cross. Different emphasis. Mel Gibson's Passion of the Christ, or as my friend calls it, Good Friday the thirteenth, because it was like a snuff film in terms of the horror. This is also Mel Gibson's own mind.
He devoted maybe ten seconds to the resurrection. The focus was on the passion. Now that is an extremely crude version. But even, oh, and one more thing. I mean, Mel Gibson's father, Hutton, who's an Orthodox Catholic, hated Vatican II, loathed it.
And I think it was Ron Cali, twenty third, who removed the perfidy of the Jew or something from the Easter because they had their, quote, antisemitism was, from their point of view, it was the Jews, they were those who fomented the requirement or the demand for the crucifixion versus Pilate, who did it himself, who was told he was basically a governor. Now I just threw 50 facts at you, all of them wrong, stitched together so stupidly. But don't you find the little nuances huge in terms of what makes one sect what it is and the other is not.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Sure. You know, I would say between most Protestants I
Speaker 0: hear you. Yeah. If I hear you. Okay. Sound great?
Speaker 1: You know, the the the specifically to that, the passion of Christ, the emphasis on the crucifix, it has to do and Michelangelo actually, brilliantly, Michelangelo, captures this in the altarpiece in the Sistine Chapel, talking about the concord to elect the Pope, Last Judgment scene. Visually responding to so he's painted this just a couple of decades after Martin Luther posts his 95 Poses in 1517. So he's having to respond to the two pillars of what become referred to as the Two Pillars of Protestant sola fide sola skritura the second one sola skritura by scripture alone The previous one Sola Fide. All you have to do is say, I believe that Jesus, you're my Lord and Savior and you're saved. Well the Catholic church is responsible because that's kind of a duh, no duh position.
Yeah. That's like, and? You just keep it there, or you're going to do, you're to take the ball and run with it then. So the idea is that if one wishes to share in the Resurrection of Christ, as a disciple, one must share in the life of Christ, which includes ultimately suffering and death.
Speaker 0: Precisely. And you aren't necessarily guaranteed. You know, it's funny how sometimes Protestants will laugh that the Catholics can just go in for confession or reconciliation, whatever it's called now, And then that's it. To which I respond, well, you think that all you have to do is be saved. Catholics say, that's part of it, your life, your addition of St.
Peter. Are you worthy? They don't have the notion of purgatory. They don't recognize Mary. They don't recognize I believe that for you to understand the differences in the faith actually concretizes your faith even better because you have to know what you believe in.
You just can't say it's not like being a Yankees fan. All you gotta do is buy a ticket, show up, and know when to root. It's not like that for you to connect yourself. And if those watching, and I forgot to say this, Professor Walters here gives the most exquisite tours of the Vatican, his organization, his site, Vati Land, which we will have here, is look at what he knows. Have you ever said in your life, I don't know.
Beats that all out of me. I don't know. You've never shown. Either that or you're just making it up, which I kid, of course. I know you're not.
But your encyclopedic knowledge of this, is this part of your academia, your academic studies, your academe? Or is something else? How do you know?
Speaker 1: No. It's pretty well, I have no life.
Speaker 0: You should be a cardinal.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You'd be It's just a lifetime. Know, I take a cue from The better the teacher, the better the student. Never stop being a student. You never stop learning.
You never stop wanting to learn. You never stop humbly admitting when you're in error, inaccurate, imprecise and trying to be more so. And it's a constant process.
Speaker 0: I think, though, the thing that is the most important is that look at all of the rules. I always go back to this hypothetical of somebody from another planet who comes here and I'm saying, Listen to this man. There are scholars, just like in the Yeshivas, and there are Jewish scholars study the Talmud and the Torah, they spend their lives dissecting questions of hypotheticals. The amount of lore, doctrinal history is mind boggling in terms of just a Catholic church. And yet, just like in our case, it's amazing what you can get away with.
Think about assassinations, think about coup d'etat, stolen elections, whatever your particular affiliation is. We believe that whenever there is some type of a blatant error, that somebody rings a bell and it stopped, that there's some internal dead man switch that says, Oh no, you don't. You can't do this. Surely somebody is going to find out and complain and call the papers. They know nothing about it because they're lulled into this Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a five alarm fire in Italy. Again, Cholamchie, who might be helpful if you want, I know he'll be fine with it. He has a lot of, you know, why reinvent the wheel? He has a lot of good, in English, little mini videos. There's three in particular I can send them if you want, maybe you want to attach them to the bottom of this.
Just explaining a lot of graphics so it's very visually helpful for people because there's a lot to wrap their mind around, I realize. So that might be helpful. But there's a five alarm fire, mean, you know, everybody's kind of panicking and really worried, those who existentially care about this stuff, here in Italy, as we ramp up to Wednesday. And it's not the end of everything, but it's kinda like, can there be a comeback? And I'm gonna wait.
I was gonna I was gonna do it now, maybe like a drop of last final bomb. I'm not. Let's wait and see what happens. Okay. And then whatever does happen, I'll give you an update and Oh, please.
Where things now would stand at that
Speaker 0: point. It be important to me to ask you, are you a Catholic yourself?
Speaker 1: I was baptized the Roman Catholic.
Speaker 0: Okay. That's all. I'm just curious because it would be for me, for example, if I were to be some expert of, let's say, Jewish lore or somebody says, What are you Jewish? No. But then again, you don't have to be a woman to be a gynecologist.
That's a bad example. But I'm just curious because I have respect for I mean, if I can study the history of France and live in this country, it's the study the naked study of the of the of the history, which is so fascinating to me. What is your expertise? You you are a professor. What do you teach?
Speaker 1: Well, I've taught the courses over the fifteen years. I've taught Latin, I've taught ancient Roman history, comparative world religions, courses in the New Testament. But over the past several years, two courses in particular have become very popular. One is called The Popes of Mystery of the Catholic Church and the other is called Mystics, Saints and Studied in Medieval Catholic Theology. So I mentioned last time my CV, so if your audience didn't watch that previous interview, they can go back to the beginning where you asked me about my CV.
Right. Within all that, my Ph. D. Thesis was in something called philology, the theological aspect is called something called ecclesiology, which is the logical rational principle of this thing we call the church. The structure of the church, its governance, its formation, its grassroots, everything.
Speaker 0: And philology is almost like a love of knowledge.
Speaker 1: An intimate love of logical, rational principles communicated via words. In other words, what does a word really mean?
Speaker 0: Why is Latin important? Why would you advocate learning it? What does it do?
Speaker 1: Yeah, both Latin and Greek, but just for Latin's sake. Mean, number one, it's what every modern Romance language, but also English, which is now the ironically lingua franca of the world
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Is based is based on. It's what allows English to be, in my opinion, the premier language to communicate in in the world, phonetic alphabetized language, because it has a vast, vast vocabulary. And the study of Latin, number one, it disciplines the mind to think critically, logically, rationally. Mhmm. Just the going about learning it.
And number two, it suddenly opens up, you know, once you understand what a word really means, it completely opens up your horizon and makes you understand things in a very different light.
Speaker 0: When I went to a Jesuit high school, I took Latin and I found out a number of things. First, it was to me the ultimate FU to my friends with their Spanish and French. I don't need this. Everybody else said, that's number one. Because we we we also thought we were just different.
Right. There is a sound to it. There's something. It sounds almost everything sounds profound. And the Catalina How are we going to put up with it?
But it was an even profound the pledge of allegiance. Notice I say, vexolo. I speak classical Latin, not that churchy. What's your phrase for church Latin?
Speaker 1: What is it called? Spaghetti Latin.
Speaker 0: Spaghetti Latin. Spaghetti Latin. Yeah. And also, I know most people get who and whom and correct. This teaches you.
When you talk about plupers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, grammar.
Speaker 0: Yes, grammar. In order for you to speak and when you speak any language where the adjective comes after. You go through the sentence and then at the end, I was like, I'm making all this stuff out of the way and now I'll worry about the descriptors. The dative case and conjugation of verbs. And aside from that, I loved it.
I never, ever, ever. And you don't have to necessarily know something to open up your mind and to stretch it. I always give the analogy of somebody who's about to run will put themselves into contortions that they will never mimic or replicate during a run, but being able to So, Latin is just It's well worth the effort as far as I'm concerned. Maybe I'm biased.
Speaker 1: Right. Yeah. No, no, I 100% agree. My doctoral research was on the, what we call, well, just an analysis of one word in Latin from the first time it appears in the Latin language until the time of Constantine, the word being unitas, meaning oneness. And this is how the ecclesiology, the structure of the Church comes into play, as well as the Trinity, Trinitarian theology, all sorts of stuff.
It's useless to mow the lawn. You want to uproot the weeds. And so that's also part of my approach.
Speaker 0: Is the shape, the attitude of Rome to live in Rome based upon what you've seen? The crime, immigration, the attitude, the flavor. What's Rome like now? When in Rome?
Speaker 1: Alright. Yeah. You know, correlation does not necessarily mean causation, but Right. And it's not it's not it's not just me, a lot of friends and colleagues, peers, acquaintances. It's I you know, strangely enough, since 2013 and very recently now, I don't like the feel.
Speaker 0: Isn't it something how the derivative effects of something seemingly it's the old butterfly wings and how something seemingly disconnected can affect, can trickle down, to use a Reagan term, I guess, into effect. I feel exactly the same way. We have a thing here in New York, this notion Giuliani provided or made it popular was it's the broken windows effect where Wilson and whatever had this idea that if you have a neighborhood where there's always this one storefront with a broken window and it's never fixed, it gives people the impression people don't care about it. Whereas you go after little pieces of crime and it shows people they mean business. So little things, 100%, What about the notion of heterogeneity?
Some people are suggesting that when you have influxes, and they always focus sometimes on African, I think there might be, I don't want to use the word racist, but put it this way, other non Roman white Europeans don't catch their attention. But what happens when a culture, perhaps by virtue of dilution or I'm not gonna use words like contamination, but what happens when the Roman culture and the Italian culture and the way of life, when it is affected by influxes non Roman?
Speaker 1: There's a point where you reach, what would you call it, supersaturation, over saturation levels. And maybe it can be repaired, maybe not. So that's where we're at here.
Speaker 0: Well, Eric Thaddeus Walters, Professor Eric Thaddeus Walters, I will have everything in the description portion up to and including the link from last time. I will put your YouTube channel. And if somebody wanted to enlist your services for Vatty land to get a you are make people understand this. You're just not some dude with a little sign that says tours. Are certified.
Explain your bona fides when it comes to giving
Speaker 1: Yeah, well again, going back Yeah, when you asked me about just how do I have all this knowledge and stuff, number one, I never stopped learning and studying, doing my own research, continued research trying to publish stuff. And number two, just because of, you know, all of that, the amalgamation over time of both doing it simultaneously while, you know, a postgraduate student, and it just kind of snowballs forward and never ends. It's just that so, you know, Vatican Blue does.
Speaker 0: But you are also given some kind of a distinction, are you not? You have some type of a Yeah,
Speaker 1: Vatican Vatican Blue Guide does. So there's thousands and thousands of guides all over Italy. Here in Rome, there's at least a few thousand legitimately licensed guides because here that's a big deal, you have to if you want to do it and not have problems, have to be licensed somehow. You can be licensed by a province, meaning like a county or a city or something like that. In this case, it's the Vatican itself.
Vatican blue eyed docents. In Italian, it's called or didactic operator, but it sounds more clear and clear to
Speaker 0: So you are you are a five star
Speaker 1: I'm not the only one, but yeah.
Speaker 0: Still, you have five star platinum diamond gold. Last question. As you can tell, I'm perennial liar. I always say, last question for about five or six times. Are you ever gonna come back to the Are you permanently Or do you consider yourself a Roman, an expat?
Where do you fit into this weird world that we live in?
Speaker 1: I I think I'm a stranger in a strange land wherever I go. I mean, you know, Rome Rome Rome really is Rome really is home. Last time I was physically back, set foot in The States was eight years ago, and that was for five days. And the time before that was eleven years earlier, so I don't get back much.
Speaker 0: And you couldn't wait to get back as soon as you when you first
Speaker 1: Well, used to ask me, you know, do you what do you miss from The States? And I I said Popeyes. And then the last time I went back the last time I went back, I was I had a layover in the Detroit Internet in the Detroit Airport. And I was in the international terminal, so I started the Popeyes, let's try that up. And it was not as I remembered, so I was disappointed.
Speaker 0: Yeah, the dirty rice just kind of loses its pronoun. I also love to if ever I make I have never had the pleasure, and if Mrs. Eldon and I go there, I'm going to call you up whether you like it or not. But I would always want to say let me see Rome the way you see it. I don't want to go to.
Don't forget the beaten path.
Speaker 1: A lot know a lot of a lot of my friend. A lot of my friends meaning Roman friends, I know Rome better than most of them. Like they ask me about, you know, directions or how to do that.
Speaker 0: I also want to find out things that drive you crazy, like cheese on fish and other We'll talk about that some other day. Professor Eric Thaddeus Walters, again, I will have all of your CV, your bona fides, endless. Let us talk again after the other
Speaker 1: shoe shoe And,
Speaker 0: and again, I want to thank you for your wisdom and your genius and your absolute encyclopedic knowledge. You have made this so incredibly important. Thank you so much, my friend.
Speaker 1: Sure. Thank you. All right. Thank
Speaker 0: you, sir.
reSee.it AI Summary
A user questioned the legitimacy of Pope Francis, suggesting a significant revelation from Lionel Nation. Another user responded with a link to a video on a platform, hinting at themes related to the "Black Pope" and indicating the content is for entertainment purposes.
@Jasper_Truth - Jasper Truth 🇺🇸
WAS P0PE FRANC!S EVER REALLY THE POPE? VAT!CAN BOMBSHELL EXPOSED! By the Legend Lionel Nation
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker introduces Dr. Eric Thaddeus Walters to discuss Pope Francis's potential demise and what might follow, clarifying it is not Catholic bashing but a historical and governmental analysis. Walters refers to Pope Benedict XVI's biographer, Peter Seewald, noting Benedict spent more time in an "impeded see" than actively serving as Pope. Benedict hinted he might be the last Pope. Walters claims Benedict's papacy was usurped in a coup d'etat, resulting in an impostor.
Walters says Benedict did not properly abdicate, and few prelates complained for the right reasons. Gainsfine implied Benedict's actions weren't what the world thinks. Petitions were sent to the Vatican's Secretary of State to declare the Pope is truly dead. Canon law dictates a maximum of 120 cardinal electors, but there are currently more, potentially invalidating the upcoming conclave. A Sardinian cardinal was barred from voting, raising legal questions. The papacy is described as the world's only non-hereditary, elected, absolute theocratic monarchy. Walters believes Bergoglio's death was clean. Front runners for the next Pope include Turksen and Tagle, but geopolitical factors could influence the choice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The video you're about to see, the interview you're about to see, is in my humble opinion one of the most fascinating I have ever had the pleasure of being involved in and with. Not me, but my guest and my friend, Doctor. Eric Thaddeus Walters. A man of immune colossal knowledge, sobriety, And I use that in the the the serious tone regarding one of the most fascinating cases filled with intrigue, labyrinthine conspiracies. I mean, it is it is like like Mandelbrot's fractals.
You keep getting closer and closer and deeper and deeper, and there's more there. I wanna say one thing before we begin this. This is not in any way Catholic bashing. This is not about the theology, the the liturgy of of the of the of the faith. It has nothing to do with this.
This is the oldest, in essence, non hereditary monarchical theocracy in the history of the world. This isn't just some religious internecine battle among Catholics. This is bigger than anything you've seen. And the final word is, this goes to show you yet again, how, as is often the case, when something so great and so grand becomes made aware to the people, whether it's assassination theories or corruption, Americans and people think that there must be some tribunal that will jump in and correct it that says, hey. Wait a minute.
You can't do this. Wrong. Yet again, it goes to show you how so much can go wrong Unaffected, unavoided, unaltered. That is exactly what we're talking about. So my friend, I thank you for watching this.
Sit back and get ready for one of the most fascinating. And by the way, this a follow-up to a prior interview we did, and I'm going to have that link as well. For those of you who think you know about the papacy, or the Catholic church, or Benedict, or Bergoglio, or Ratzinger, get ready for this. Get ready to be mesmerized. The reaction to this gentleman was like nothing I have ever seen in my years.
Doctor. Eric Thaddeus Walters, professor, Maeste, the one and the only, joined us to give us a kind of a a bird's eye or or Vatican's eye view of Bergoglio prince, prince. Oh my god. Maybe that was a pun. Pope Francis' demise.
What happens next? And professor Walters, welcome back. And and I wanna just say a a preface. This is not Catholic bashing. This is not, you know, in fact, it's anything but.
This is an historical news review of the realities of a transition which affects the world and not necessarily just Catholics. So lest anyone thinks we're getting in the digs or talking about either the theology or the Eucharist or the liturgy or No, no, no, no, no. This is about a quasi, dare I say, governmental transition process. Would that be fair, Eric? This almost like quasi governmental?
Speaker 1: This is this is revolutionary. Oh, we'll we'll get to that. It's beyond that. It's this is the end of an epic.
Speaker 0: Okay. Tell us and just just one last word. Don't let me ask the question. I don't know anything. I am nascent regarding this.
Tell me what we should know, what insiders know, what, Romans know, what what your colleagues what the insiders know. Proceed, Okay.
Speaker 1: So once again, came up with a little outline. It's there's a lot to cover because I did I'm glad that the audience, the last time, enjoyed it. I personally went through all the comments and I was very appreciative of them and a lot of interesting follow-up, you know, questions that people had, So there's no way we're gonna be able to go through everything. So I'm trying to keep this limited to a few things. Maybe not to be salacious, but already off the a few interesting things that I actually did want to mention last time, but just we didn't have time.
So the premier biographer of Pope Benedict XVI, the German journalist, Peter and it's in English translation. I think the English translation is 'Final Conversations from twenty sixteen' and there's a lot of one liners and takeaways. So anyway, it's an interview format with Pope Benedict XVI, pretty much the last interview he ever gave, or at least published. One takeaway line is, the interviewer, the author Peter Seywald, asks him, and this is going on in the, what's called the, monastery Mater Ecclesiae in the Vatican Gardens overlooking Saint Peter's Basilica and the Sistine Chapel, which is where he spent the last ten years of his life. Also bear in mind, Benedict, you know, all the spin they put out immediately following his resignation his resignation, which was not a resignation as we mentioned last I explained last time.
Right. And the election of Dragojo. Part of the spin was, oh, you know, Benedict is frail, he's sick, he's ill. Well, for being so sick, frail, and ill, he spent more than half of his pontificate in an impeded sea. Nine years of that The impeded sea, again, he's a prisoner either of an external force or an internal force force, in this case, within the church itself.
Speaker 0: And and I'm sorry. Not to interrupt, but somebody might say s e e, the holy sea, the impeded sea, what is the s e e for Lenin and myself?
Speaker 1: Yeah, sure. It's where we get the English word seat from. There's a difference in Latin between a cathedra, from which we get the word cathedral, cathedra meaning the chair of the magister, the teacher in the classroom, or the magistrate in the courtroom, in this case the chair of Peter, meaning the Pope. Okay? So there's a difference though in Latin between a c s double e s e e, in Latin, seides, meaning a generic chair, could be any kind of a chair, and the cate bera is unique, specific, that chair to these these roles.
Okay. Okay. In any event, the interviewer Peter Sewald asks Pope Bennett the sixteenth, who was pope for ten years well, he used to pope for longer as an in an impeded sea as prisoner than he was actually doing pope, so much for that. Ten years he was in an impeded sea. And the interviewer asks him at a certain point, Are you going to be the last pope?
Pope Benedict the sixteenth respond quite frankly. He says, anything is possible. So that's one thing. The other thing is all
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. Not to please. Just just impeded see when when Pope Benedict Ratzinger, the this the predecessor of Bergoglio Francis impeded see, meaning you are before transition or after before. Does that mean his his papacy was illegitimate? It was a nullity.
It was vacant. It was void. It was with an asterisk so that we understand what was his status?
Speaker 1: He was was usurped. His, his throne, usurped. Mean, to
Speaker 0: put it maybe coup. It was like a like a coup d'etat sort
Speaker 1: of It's it's it's a coup d'etat, and then you have an impostor, a usurper come in to just claim that. This, you know, like, of a Shakespearean drama or tragedy or whatever. You know?
Speaker 0: So so it would be, in essence, you have this impostor who came in and told the world I am, and nobody nobody, the the the white smoke, all of that, nobody spoke up, or did they? Everybody knew this.
Speaker 1: There were high ranking prelates at the time, both bishops and cardinals, not a lot, maybe half a dozen or so, who did publicly make statements to this point and to the effect that he was usurped, he was a coup d'etat, but nothing formally on the part of those who could have and should have done something, namely the pre-twenty 13 elected cardinals. That is cardinals created by either Pope John Paul the second or, Pope Benedict the sixteenth.
Speaker 0: And, again, not to not to I'm I'm violating my own rules here. The Pope Benedict Ratzinger did not die, did not, quote, step down. Can that be done? How is how is a papacy how is the secession or the the the terminus of a of a papacy, how is that accomplished thus allowing a vacancy and then the reelection? Is that even possible?
Can you do that without a pope being dead?
Speaker 1: Well, only unless the either the pope has to die Mhmm. Or, the pope has to properly abdicate, resign the office of being pope, which in Latin is called munus, m u n u s, munus. And Benedict did not do that.
Speaker 0: Okay. Interesting. So he and and and and and again, all of this is done, and nobody is saying, hey. Wait a minute. Wait a minute here in this thing.
If if somebody tried to do that with pope or even oh, listen to me, Paul. Trump or Biden, they would have been screaming, you can't do this. It would have been constitutional scholars. It was done. Under the radar with a tacit.
Say nothing. That's the part that blows my mind and others as well. They say, Eric, this can't be. You just you just you just don't go out there and nobody in Saint Peter's Square says, hey, hold it. Not one person, nobody on television, not not our our Cardinal Dolan.
Nobody, not did did Vigano or any of the other, heretics say who complained about this?
Speaker 1: Well, those that did complain, there were very few that did it for the correct reasons. Okay? Okay. There were others, many vegano, I think, could be placed in that category that did it for seemingly other and unproductive Okay. Counterproductive and perhaps personal interest being Okay.
Speaker 0: Grudges, axes to grind, purse animus, whatever. Okay. Yeah. Okay. Forgive me.
Proceed, sir.
Speaker 1: It's okay. Okay. So, so that's one thing. Another thing is when Benedict again did the Declaratio and in the aftermath and again repeated to the journalist Peter Sewell, who I mentioned earlier, he also mentioned, if anyone vaguely recalls when this all happened in February and March of twenty thirteen, Oh, the first Pope to resign in five hundred and ninety three years was a member. No.
Benedict said that, What I'm doing has not happened in over a thousand years. And he was referring specifically to the year 10/13 and his predecessor who did abdicate, but also for forced reasons, by the Holy Roman Emperor at the time. Was in the 10/13.
Speaker 0: Wow. And who is that, Praytell?
Speaker 1: Well, rather ironically, if not providentially, Pope Benedict eighth, at the Yeah.
Speaker 0: Cue the theremin. Wow.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Okay. And then finally, in this kind of more just a salacious part, guess, if you will, archbishop Gainsfine, whom I mentioned also last time, Pope Benedict XVI's personal secretary, now Archbishop he's done a lot of public appearances. He's very careful and measured with his words, but to his credit, this last year, 2024, he was thinking about giving a conference in a church in the North Of Italy, and he said to everyone, there's a few hundred people there, I guess, in the church, that what Benedict did is not what the world thinks.
Meaning? Implied. Wow. Preside. Yeah.
Speaker 0: This cryptic these these measured, almost like read between the lines. I think we had joked about, Jeremiah Denton, the POW, who was blinking torture when he was it it's as though he's the he is the person, the woman at the door when the police officer comes, is everything alright? And they open the door and there's a chain and she's trying to say, no. Everything's fine. Everything's fine.
So there are these signals, and and and you understood it. How many of your if if I walked around with you and talked to your colleagues and friends and those in the know, how many of you would say, oh, absolutely. Of course, that is. Of of course, that's true.
Speaker 1: A lot. Wow. The problem is everything happened so fast. Just, I mean, warp speed, you know, to wrap your head around it and to figure out what was happening in the first place, you know, again, analytically, you know, accurately, it took a little time and it kept taking time. And then, you know, there are questions posed to Prelates, it's just they avoid it, they don't want to know, nothing to see or move along kind of thing.
But now it's gotten a fever pitch in Italy.
Speaker 0: Really? Okay. Okay. That's what I wanna know. Because as you can imagine here
Speaker 1: No. It's it's fever pitch.
Speaker 0: Nobody nobody is saying, okay, wow.
Speaker 1: If you remember the Italian journalist I mentioned last time, Andrea Cionci, he's filed several petitions. He actually got he actually received in return from the Cardinal Secretary of State, Pietro Parolin, who just had, think, a heart attack a few days ago. I was very cordial thanking him for his solicitation. So there's been many petitions, etc, signed by thousands and thousands of people sent to the Secretary of State of the Vatican Holy See to address specifically all of these matters, and basically saying, You need to do what we discussed last time. You need to declare the Pope is truly dead, go into conflict with only the pre twenty thirteen cardinals, 20 seven, 20 eight.
I'll explain why there's a question mark over that number exactly in a moment. And do what you know you need to do. Again, some of the other canons I didn't we didn't go into last time also have to do with the cardinals have the obligation and duty to do this. That is, they can't just brush it under the rug. Mean, it's so
Speaker 0: And the pope is dead would be Bergoglio or No. No. Ratzinger.
Speaker 1: Ratzinger. Yeah. Bergoglio was an anti blood test. He's nothing.
Speaker 0: So so his so his death after his death and I'm I'm I'm so sorry. I'm a I'm a dunce here. But after anyway. After Ratzinger died in exile, in Elba, so to speak, after he died, you could have corrected it then by saying, alright. Let us take this, corrective measure here.
Say the pope is dead. Pick up where we left off. Even aft even after Bergoglio was already pope, could they have somehow fixed it, corrected that, that that glitch? Because they didn't. Am am I reading this right?
I mean or is that just forever?
Speaker 1: We've been stuck in this situation since 03/01/2013.
Speaker 0: '20 '20 '1, please?
Speaker 1: 2013. Wow. '21. So that's over twelve years?
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And the amount of years would not be so this may actually be the longest time that I think it is the longest time such as the collision has ever occurred. But there's been several moments, you know, in the history of the Catholic church where same or similar situations have occurred, you know, several years without Pope. Again, what makes this unique is this is the first time this was actually a successful coup d'etat color revolution within the church and a usurper cognizant of very completely knowing what they were doing.
Speaker 0: Okay. So okay. So continue. I'm sorry, sir. I'm I'm interrupting.
Speaker 1: So yep. So there's been a couple since we last, did this, which was, I guess, about a little over ten days ago. There's been a couple of developments. One is that one is not really a development, there's already a number, I didn't mention it. Under again Canon Law, Apostolic Canon Law from 1983, the Apostolic Constitution from 1996, and then including a Motu Proprio in Latin, which means in my own way, but it's like an executive order on the part of the Pope.
That was under Paul VI in 1970, I forget which specific year, Adding to establishing the number of legal, licit, legitimate cardinal electors in the College of Cardinals at 120. Can't have any more than 120. You can have as little as three, because it's just a two thirds majority required to validly or legally elect the Pope, but no more than 120. And they were always very careful since then Paul VI, 1970s, all the way through Benedict XVI, to never put in more potential cardinal electors than 120 in the cardinal
Speaker 0: And today, how many are there? How many are there?
Speaker 1: There's a problem, big problem. This by itself, by itself, again according to the Canon law, will nullify the conclave which is supposed to begin in three days.
Speaker 0: How many are there now?
Speaker 1: There's a hundred and well, there's over 200 total problems.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute.
Speaker 1: Not stop. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. Several scores several scores of which are over the age of 80, and so we know they're not going to be voting.
Okay? Okay. But there's a there's a 35 of voting age. So they're 15 over the limit. Wow.
So number one, if all a 55 go into the Sistine Chapel as per church law itself, null and void, that's number one. Number two, if even just one post 2013 cardinal, meaning card meaning a cardinal created by Bibroglio, even if just one out of a hundred and eight. So he's created a total of a hundred and eight. 70 five percent of the College of Cardinals now. Even though not one of them is a legitimate legal cardinal, and they face actual sanctions on the part of the Holy See.
Like, serious prison time, if anyone does what they're supposed to be about them.
Speaker 0: Prison?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Potentially, theoretically. Serious sanctions. Serious sanctions. I mean, they could be, you know, it could be commuted.
Speaker 0: Right. Right. You know, there's
Speaker 1: something else. But they're stripped of everything. I mean, there is plagiarization. So, among other things. So, even if just one of those 100 makes bergolian cardinals, cardinals created under the K.
A. Pope Francis, anti Pope Francis, Even if just one of them sets foot in conclave, the conclave is null and void, once again. It's an illegally legitimate conclave. It can only be the pre twenty thirteen cardinals created by popes John Paul the second and Benedict the sixteenth, of which there's 27 or 28. Why 27 or 28?
Well, this is a development that happened. And this is a real this is, you know, this is like something out of a I'm not gonna use I'm doing my best to be careful and measure here. Just imagining your favorite mafia movie. Okay. Yeah.
Right. I understand. Yeah. There's there's a card Sardinian cardinal, last name Baechu, and he was created by Bergoglio anyway in the first place. Well, he took the place of the Australian Cardinal Pell, whom Bergoglio put in charge of basically the the the new entity responsible for cleaning up your IOR.
The Vatican Bank. It's usually euphemistically referred to. Okay. Cardinal Pell, the Australian who died a few years ago, also in interesting circumstances, we'll just say. Mhmm.
Yeah. He took the place of the guy before him that was in charge of this, put in charge of this by Pope Bennett the sixteenth, Archbishop Carlo Maria de Jano. Wow. Who was doing his job and doing a good job. And that's one of the reasons well, maybe we'll come back to that.
That's one of the reasons why then he was sent as the Apostolic Moon seal to The United States in Washington, D. C, basically the Vatican and Holy Seals ambassador to The United States Of America, because they were already being forced and pressured. Hope ended the sixteenth losing a lot of support and he wiggle room, you know, he couldn't it was it was it was becoming more and more confined already. Again, is all leading up to his declaration in February of twenty thirteen. Suddenly, I just lost my own thought.
Oh, so Baekhu, this guy, after Bergolio died, I think it was right probably right the day we did the previous interview Mhmm. Or in the day after he meets with the guy that just had a heart attack a few days ago, the Cardinal Secretary of State, Parolin. Parolin gives him a handwritten letter. It was typed out, but, you know. Right.
It says basic it's a it says that this cardinal Baetzhu, who had already been relieved of command, and that for a while he was also relieved of his any cardinalatial prerogatives, but then Vergoglio reinstated them. There's a lot of backroom to be able to go on here. But he was relieved of his command from, you know, investigating the transparency and financial activities of Vatican Bank, the Yor. And so the other so the last week, he says to so Parolin shows him this letter, supposedly Bergoglio had written. It says, you're not allowed to vote in conclave.
Signed f. So not even his not even his full name, Francis, just f. F. There's no date on it.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: And this this cardinal Beech, who says to Potawatim, his witness, the other people there, says, This is not legal. This is not listed. This is not valid. I'm not respecting this. Now what are gonna do?
And now suddenly, a few days ago, Farooq just had a heart attack or severe health problem. Don't know what exactly. Wow. Yeah. That's high drama here.
Speaker 0: Now let me stop for a sec. Let me stop. Okay. The work what the only according to what you're saying, the only me stop. Only a 20 eligible cardinals are able to vote.
Now you could have more who are 90, a hundred, but you up to the age of 80, you cannot vote after 80. You can remain your cardinalship or whatever the particular now Yes.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: You you can. You can stay on. You can have 500 if you want, but only the ones after 80, you stop voting. I did not know.
Speaker 1: You you, yeah, you cannot vote.
Speaker 0: 20 were there from Ratzinger excuse me, from Benedict and then JP Deuce. Right? Those two. They're with the other one. Anyone after that, any cardinal appointed theoretically by Francis doesn't count.
So the only ones who can and you can have a minimum, we say a quorum, if you will, a minimum of three and no more than 120 voting. They could be and they can't be in the room. Correct? You can only have a 20. So let's say there's 200 total.
The the the other 80 cannot be in that conclave. It can only be a 120 bona fide certified legitimate authorized cardinals
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Who can vote. And you say right now, of that 120, there's about a 35 who are attending attempting to vote.
Speaker 1: A 35. So that's over one and twelve. 15 over the limit anyway.
Speaker 0: Right. Right.
Speaker 1: And? And moreover, 108 were all created by Virgolio. Wow. This also unprecedented in history. He's the guy that's created the most cardinals in history who are not cardinals because he was not the pope.
So but anyway.
Speaker 0: So we have 27. Right? My my math. Roughly about 27 or 28, you said, who can actually vote.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And if you walked into to to the to the and by the way, if you had in that conclave any more than that 27 or 28 who were able to vote, does that nullify the validity of the conclave as well?
Speaker 1: Out of 108 Bergolian cardinals, even if one of them sets foot in the conclave with conclave is Abenizio de facto no one's word.
Speaker 0: Right. Now if somebody if I were to ask, theoretically, everybody in Rome or anybody who is conversant with the papacy rules to say, how many of you have heard this or know this? How many people would honestly say, yep. We know all about that. We're not saying anything, but Eric Thaddeus Walters is 100% correct.
How many do you think roughly would would acknowledge this?
Speaker 1: Of those who care?
Speaker 0: Yes and no. Correct.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I would say
Speaker 0: All of them.
Speaker 1: More than more than 50%. Wow. Wow. Wow. And Okay.
The the other where the other remaining percentage of whatever that would be are what you or what some might characterize as gatekeepers, whether they're in the media.
Speaker 0: Right. Right. Right. Okay. So where do we go now?
And what happens?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the con this so I'm going I I'll keep calling it an illegitimate illegal conclave because no one's done anything yet about it, begins on this Wednesday, May 7, in the morning. And so what will happen is in St. Peter's Basilica there will be a mass and then then they will well, then they and and all the cardinals will be there present for that, so that's over 200. And then if 135 go into the Sistine Chapel, Conclave null and void, but they'll do what they usually do.
They'll do the rounds of voting called scuttingi. There's a session in the morning and a session in the afternoon, and they do that for five days in a row, and if they don't come up with anyone on the fifth day, then they take another few days off to, I don't know, get in touch with the Holy Spirit or something, and then they go back into Conclave again for more rounds of voting. Now that's not happened in, I don't remember one last time, a long time. I mean, the last several elections have been done historically relatively quickly, anywhere from one to a few days and not even a full five days. So that starts on Wednesday, Wednesday morning.
But as I said, if if those 35 just one of the Bedolian Cardinals goes in, it's another illegal and illegitimate conclave. Okay? And so whoever they know and in the meantime, there could be fireworks. In other words, it could happen in the Sistine Chapel.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: You know, a proper drop down what do you call it? Down, drag out fight.
Speaker 0: Right. Knock down, drag out. Yeah. Yep.
Speaker 1: Knock down, drag out. Yeah. You know, who knows? So Now
Speaker 0: a couple of couple of questions here. First, you mentioned before somebody could be imprisoned or who because the the the first thing, Eric, people might be saying is, oh, this is just some internecine battle of Catholics. Who cares? Doesn't affect anything. It's a bunch of people in dresses and funny hats and pink shoes and red shoes.
And so what? It's bigger than that. This is not just about a Catholic church. It is about Yeah. What would you call it?
Almost like an an it's almost like ancillary to the monarchy. It's it's Yeah. To me, there's there's no explain that significance of what the papacy means.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the papacy, to put it in, those kind of, governmental political terms, is the world's only is the world's only non hereditary, elected, absolute theocratic monarchy, the king of which is the pope.
Speaker 0: Interesting. Theocratic monarchy. Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Non hereditary, although there is nepotism, for example, the Renaissance period, the border jocks.
Speaker 0: And there's monarchical. For example, one could argue that Iran, for example, people say, that's a theocracy or something. But that's not that's that's not hereditary. That's that's that's almost dare I say, a democratic theocracy there, you're voted or voted or I
Speaker 1: lost it. This
Speaker 0: is this is a different story altogether. So that's number one. Number two, what is the judicial review, if you will, process? If the pope is infallible, the pope is like the Supreme Court, our whatever the pope says is ipso facto by its very nature, correct. End of discussion.
Do you think that anyone could could actually bring this up? Has there been any kind of a civil war or anybody who told a pope you're doing something wrong or
Speaker 1: Oh, yes. Over history. Sure. Sure.
Speaker 0: Is it successful? Is there is there a tribunal that that could
Speaker 1: over overrule both? Yeah. Some sometimes it is. Sometimes it isn't. I know I I don't wanna get too lost.
And so these are these are all important, profound, deep and fascinating, time consuming questions. That's why it's so complicated, you know, to wrap one's head around one of them. Know, most recently, it was the first Vatican Council, eighteen sixty nine-eighteen seventy, when Pope Pius IX, the Church's longest reigning Pope ever, thirty three years, it was under him that Papal States collapsed into what we know today as Vatican City State. He issued what's called the dogma of papal infallibility. When the pope speaks ex cathedra from the throne, He's infallible in matters of faith and morals.
Right. And morals is an unfortunate and really inaccurate translation from the Latin morres because morres much more encompassing. It doesn't just mean ethical behavior. Means customs and traditions and all sorts of things. And if if anyone if you're any of your audience has ever heard of Lord Dalderg Acton.
Lord Acton. I think it his an institute who's his name after him.
Speaker 0: Oh, power cops, sir.
Speaker 1: He he's the guy that, at least in the modern period, coined that phrase, all power all power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: He he uttered those words to Pope Pius IX's face in December of eighteen seventy, trying to get him not to make this a dogma. Now
Speaker 0: a little background. My understanding, my pedestrian understanding is that Mussolini and the Vatican under Pius XI formed some kind of an alliance, the Lateran Treaty of 1920 And Because I find this interesting, like Mussolini, also Italy is with Libya and Because we in The United States, as you know, being from here, we're used to, we've been here, we've added on, but we don't have any serious questions as to how Arizona came about or who owns So this is almost like Harry Potter ish. What's that about Mussolini and the Vatican?
Speaker 1: So, I don't want to bore people with
Speaker 0: You cannot bore anybody. It's impossible for you to bore anybody.
Speaker 1: Okay. So the Vatican is the world's oldest, continuously still surviving nation state of any kind. It was formally established in the year July between Pope Stephen the second and the barbarian chieftain of the Merovingians at the time, a guy named Peppin or Pepin the Short, not to be confused with his relative, Pepin the Fat. So the barbarian chieftain of the Merovingians, whom the pope, the previous pope, or the pope invited to invade the Italian Peninsula to subdue two other barbarian groups, the Ostrogoths and the Lombards. Okay.
They accomplished this successfully in July, and that's when the Papal States begin, the sovereign, temporal, monarchical rulers of which are the Popes. It's also when European nobility begins because for his part, the pope grants Tuppepin and his two sons, Carloman and Charlemagne, the ancient Roman legal title of nobility, Patricius Romanorum or Patrician of the Romans. So this is when European nobility begins. If you think about the battered guy in England, all that stuff, you know, the wizards, that's going to be formally begun. Always under the pope.
Not because he's not actually not specifically because he's the successor of Peach or the Vicar of Christ, but because he's also the Bolt Viex Maximus, which we can come back to either now or a later time. That's long. Anyway, so and this lasts. So the Papal States then from that point until 1870, basically covered the central third of the Italian Peninsula. Okay?
During the so called unification of Italy in the nineteenth century, so for your American listeners, while the US Civil War was going on, was a civil war going on here, referred to as the Unification of Italy. By 1870, the Papal States had been collapsed into what we know today as 44 hectares or 110 acres of land, Vatican City State. And in fact, historians refer to this period between 1870 and 1929 coming to the Lateran Treaty as the Roman question. Wow. What do we do now with this Pope thing?
Because, you know, we got a lot of Catholics running around the world. So 1929, February eleventh, the same day Benedict made his Declaratio. 02/11/1929, the Lateran Treaty is signed between Pope Pius XI and dictator of Italy at the time, Mussolini, Benito Mussolini, establishing Vatican City State with all sorts of provisions for remunerations because of the loss of tax revenue from the Papal States Mhmm. And all sorts of other legalities and just things.
Speaker 0: See, but that's fascinating because the the one thing that we know and and one of the the interesting stories which folks, I think, forget, and I am not by any stretch of the imagination, a biblical scholar or historian. But one of the problems that Jesus posed to Pontius Pilate was, Who's this guy? We don't like somebody within the confines of our jurisdictions claiming not only allegiance with a bunch of people who can turn against this and some kind of very powerful, if not supernatural. We don't care for this. So Mussolini and others had to realize we had to do something about these folks.
We have to mollify them, contain them. It's almost like containment theory, we did with NATO and Soviet Union. So that's something interesting because if anybody thinks, put it this way, there is no, and you would agree, with all due respect to our brothers and sisters who were Jews or Lutherans or Baptists, there ain't nothing like Roman Catholics. It's an army. Also, not to be parenthetically abstruse but the Jesuits are of of which I went to to a Jesuit high school and that's all I know.
From Ignatius Loyola and admirem Doria, the admirem de Iglorium and the Society of Jesus and that is something which is another another story. Black popes and it is so if if you love I don't wanna keep saying Harry Potter, but but Byzantine mystery mysterious storylines. It doesn't get better than this. There's nothing like it. Nothing.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Truth is stranger than fiction. I find anyone.
Speaker 0: So another question, Eric. By the way, dear friend, thank you for this. You. Is there any question or any suspicions as to the cause, if you will, of the death of Bergoglio? Any anybody is is was that a clean death as we say?
I
Speaker 1: think so. Yeah. I don't think there's any funny business there. There were a lot of theories and speculations going around, you know, in the months prior.
Speaker 0: If you had to if you had to handicap, if you were a betting man, is it even possible when I see CBS Morning News or somebody saying, Who's likely to be? You don't know anything about, Oh, there seems to be an unusual number of, again, is layman, African, black, nontraditional, non European, non Italian. How is that met by more of the traditional folks? And if you had to pick who would be the next pope and you were a betting man, what's the inside skinny? What does the inside line say?
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, I don't in fact, I have a I have a friend here in Rome. He's Irish. We just he he sent me the betting, you know Yeah.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: Like, patty power, that kind of thing.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Right. Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Just yesterday. The big the big front runners are two I mentioned last time. Turksen from Africa, he's from Ghana, Tagle from The Philippines, they're both Tagle is very he's the second youngest part of the period, and they're both legitimate pre 2013.
Speaker 0: Okay. Good. Good.
Speaker 1: But they're both very, you know, you the people would characterize them as being progressive, liberal, that kind of thing, among other things. I'll just leave it at that. Yeah. The other big front runners are the Secretary of State, Parolin, who just got really ill the other day. There is an American, but he's not a he's not a sitting ordinary bishop in The States.
He's actually an Curia here known. His last name is oh gosh. Let's look at my mind right now. For a couple of there were a few days where O'Malley's name of where is O'Malley in Boston? O'Malley's name and, Dolan's name were being
Speaker 0: way they're gonna pick an American. There's no way. You I mean, is that true?
Speaker 1: I have a I have a theory that could be very weird, but would still not solve the issue. But because of the geopolitics involved, I started thinking and wondering about it, and I could see where that could make sense, given what's happening on the world geopolitically now. But still, I don't think I don't really think it's
Speaker 0: There is a meme, a kind of the this memetic that's being published. And it's smoke of the rainbow color. Meaning they're laughing. The next pope is going to be another progressive. We're gonna see nuns as priests.
It's gonna be complete and total. What's what's your your take on that?
Speaker 1: Probably.
Speaker 0: Oh, no. Where is this coming from? Where is Who is behind? Oh, and one more thing. One more thing.
Did you ever hear the story? And I've heard this just maybe as a drive by. I'm hearing this that Bergoglio, Francis, every day called up the pastor or a priest a Catholic church in Gaza, which infuriated Israeli officials. There was some kind of a Have you heard about that?
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. No. That's true.
Speaker 0: What's the story behind that? And how does the Oh, and and also Bergoglio's past and juntas and death squads and living Listen, J. P. Deuce, when he was a young man, this guy, he had girlfriends, he was an actor, he probably killed people. This dude was not some monastic choir boy, from what I understand, which might be kind of good.
But how much of that affected Francis? And what's the relationship between the the the papacy and Israel, Middle East, Gaza, Palestinians, as far as you know?
Speaker 1: Very tense. No. From what I understand, Israel itself forbade any diplomats or representatives from coming to Birkoglio's funeral. Wow. You know, also people in the which is obviously a whole other issue even though it is related,
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: You know, what's happening what's happening in Palestine is a little bit you Everybody thinks, oh, they're just a bunch of nutty well, I shouldn't say nutty. They're just, you know, Muslim, Arabs, Muslim, there as well. Because
Speaker 0: Christians are under attack. Christians around the world. This is serious business. I mean, not just necessarily in the quote. Middle East has become kind of a code word for Israel or Palestine or whatever you want to call it.
But Christians, Now remember, the papacy deals not exclusively with Catholics, though that is certainly a great force of interest. But the notion of Christians under attack, there's a very serious undercurrent of problems here that the pope or the papacy should or maybe have attempted to address. Have you heard anything along those lines?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, that's you know, you can bring China into the mix because this is another big issue. Just within a couple of years after Virgilio was elected, installed, he sent yeah, it's also kinda going back to how to you know, what are some of the motivations or the factors that led to all this in the first book. So we mentioned the Sanctagalan group before. Mhmm.
Yep. The Mafia. Specifically, the now deceased Cardinal McCarrick. Yep. Yep.
And Virgilio Made McCarrick, his liaison back and forth between the Vatican and the CCP to strike a new treaty with the CCP, which has never ever been made public, which is another big problem.
Speaker 0: Problem how? How because it has been made The what what's the problem per per per se?
Speaker 1: That no one knows what's involved. No one knows what it's about.
Speaker 0: But isn't that good that they're speaking? Isn't that good that they're Sure.
Speaker 1: Sure. Of course. The prob but the problem is is number one, and it's been it's it's it was renewed in 2018. So I think that's four, five, six years after the first treaty was ratified between the two, but again, not actually because it's now in void, but whatever. Mhmm.
It was renewed again in 2018, so precisely because the contents have not been made public. Imagine The United States, you know, I don't know, the president of The United States signing a treaty with China, and they just say, don't worry about it. We're not gonna publish it. We're not gonna make it public, but, we'll take care of her.
Speaker 0: But it's a It's almost like Nancy Pelosi who said we don't know what we signed until we passed the law. Now let me ask you another stupid simple question. Out of this entire is a Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, claims to be a Catholic and has always been very, very strong. Said that
Speaker 1: He was Russian Orthodox. Was Russian
Speaker 0: Now that's the question. They said that when he was in the KGB or FSB, he put his badge away. Accepted. He was very devout. The West, we say, oh no, no, no.
Even Cathcart, no, no, no, no. Don't believe that for a moment. I've never heard how a lot of people can look into the heart of somebody and determine the legitimacy of their transformation. What Eastern right? Eastern what does that mean?
Speaker 1: Orthodoxy?
Speaker 0: Yeah, compared to plain old Catholic. What does it mean?
Speaker 1: I mean, it's basically the same thing with the trappings are slightly different, the liturgy is slightly different, the language is different.
Speaker 0: Does the Pope You
Speaker 1: mean the Pope in Rome? Yeah. Well, that's it's a political. Over the centuries, theologians and historians, it's going to be using theology somehow to justify all this, and they can't. It's all political, and it goes all the way back to the fourth century when Constantine moved the capital of the Roman Empire from Rome to Byzantium, which he named Nova Roma, New Rome because it has to reflect Rome after his death, it was ever after remembered as Constantinople, the city of Constantine, now Istanbul.
And so it goes all the way back to then. It was a fight, a battle between the political, between Constantinople as the new capital and Rome. And all sorts of theological justifications, ecclesiological justifications have been attempted over several since. None of it works.
Speaker 0: Are they correct? Because we have, of course, Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, Eastern, Armenian. We have all of these. When I was in Jerusalem in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, which is as holy as you can get, the individuals, there was something called the status quo. It was an understanding of who ran the concession because it was not only the site of Christ's crucifixion, but his burial, his tomb, where the rock was.
And I saw people with beards and not cassocks, but vestments and hats. I'm thinking, right, who are these? I never knew the flavors and
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's like to be old.
Speaker 0: Oh, it is It's like
Speaker 1: to be old.
Speaker 0: It was interesting also, you'll get a kick out of this when the Protestants said, Hey, listen, can we get in on this? They said, Excuse me? They said, No, no. And they came up with Calvary, not Gethsemane or whatever the, I don't know, but they came up with their own version of it because you have the Coptics have the concession for this. This one's got that.
And it's almost like a, I don't wanna, please, I don't mean to be, it's almost like a food court. You know, you have different
Speaker 1: people over
Speaker 0: here and really and you have people running the show and it is as a person who was a a a retired Catholic and not in any way spiritual, there was an energy in that place.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe put
Speaker 0: on from reflected from the hearts and souls and of other people, but it was something that I shan't forget. But is is it safe to say that Vladimir Putin is a Catholic?
Speaker 1: Well, he's Russian Orthodox. So in other words, the problem So the split, split, the first, there's been two schisms, ruptures within the one Holy Catholic Apostolic Church. The first was in the year October, when the Pope at the time sent his emissary ambassador, the French Cardinal Hubert or Humbert, sounds better in French, to Constantinople to issue a papal bull of excommunication against the Patriarch of Constantinople and the Emperor of Constantinople because of the issue or an issue regarding what's called the Fediocle Clause. So Catholics who practice or whatever, when you recite the Nicene Constantinopolitan Creed, become of a certain part, we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord will give our life and proceeds from the Father and the Son. Well, that was never in the original Ecumenical Council, the First Council of Constantinople in March that issued that proclamation.
It just said ex patri or from the Father, out of the Father. And the Son part was added. Now it's a logical consequence. Theologically, there's not it's a fact, I mean, in this internal aberrant of But it was then weaponized politically. It was politicized regarding the political struggle back and forth between Rome and Constantinople so that everything came to a head in October, when this Cardinal Umberg, with the papal bull ex communication, marches into Hagia Sophia on Easter Sunday while the patriarch is about to consecrate the Eucharist Wow!
The Mass, okay, And he slams on the altar the papal bull of excommunication, and the patriarch immediately it was kind of like an F me, F you moment.
Speaker 0: Yeah, right.
Speaker 1: The patriarch issues verbally, publicly in front of everyone, Hagia, Sofia, Cathedral, Istanbul, Constant over there. We call it a double excommunication. And they immediately justified. They that both sides agreed to immediately pretend like, well, that never happened. Why?
Well, because unbeknownst to Cardinal Humbert, it took him two weeks on a boat to get from Rome to Constantinople. And in the meantime, the Pope died. Here we are. Remember that? Say that
Speaker 0: Uh-oh. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The bull of excommunication he was bringing was null and void.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: On the patriarch's part, they said they never included they excommunicated the Western church, meaning the Roman Latin church, just the Cardinal Humbert, his entourage, and the pope who was dead. So, you know, they canceled each other out. But, anyway, on a grassroots level, it was too little too light. Sorry about that.
Speaker 0: There is a there's a couple of things here. Just just in terms of the the trivia and the specifics. When I was in Catholic school, we did the sign of the cross like this, to the left and to the right. Putin and Eastern will do it the other way, right to left. That's one thing, That's like sometimes a friend of mine who is a Muslim, said, What's the difference between Shia and Sunnis?
He said this or or that. Anyway, it was something with a hand. It was a kind of an inside joke. I didn't get it. That's number one.
Number two, when you talk about Protestants, because I love to ask Protestants, what is it between you and a Catholic? What's really the difference? And they can't answer the question. And a friend of mine, one time we were at a, I mean, I've told you this, we were in a a friend awake of a friend of mine in the Catholic church and my friend who's Jewish said, you know, I've never been in a church before. I said, let me show you something.
I said, you know, you can tell if you're in a Catholic church, look at the altar. You see that cross? If Jesus is on it, it's Catholic. It's a crucifix. If Jesus is off, it's Protestant because Protestants emphasize the resurrection.
Catholics not focus on but it's the the passion of Jesus and the Christ. Stations of the cross. Different emphasis. Mel Gibson's Passion of the Christ, or as my friend calls it, Good Friday the thirteenth, because it was like a snuff film in terms of the horror. This is also Mel Gibson's own mind.
He devoted maybe ten seconds to the resurrection. The focus was on the passion. Now that is an extremely crude version. But even, oh, and one more thing. I mean, Mel Gibson's father, Hutton, who's an Orthodox Catholic, hated Vatican II, loathed it.
And I think it was Ron Cali, twenty third, who removed the perfidy of the Jew or something from the Easter because they had their, quote, antisemitism was, from their point of view, it was the Jews, they were those who fomented the requirement or the demand for the crucifixion versus Pilate, who did it himself, who was told he was basically a governor. Now I just threw 50 facts at you, all of them wrong, stitched together so stupidly. But don't you find the little nuances huge in terms of what makes one sect what it is and the other is not.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Sure. You know, I would say between most Protestants I
Speaker 0: hear you. Yeah.
Speaker 1: If I hear you. Okay.
Speaker 0: Sound great?
Speaker 1: You know, the the the specifically to that, the passion of Christ, the emphasis on the crucifix, it has to do and Michelangelo actually, brilliantly, Michelangelo, captures this in the altarpiece in the Sistine Chapel, talking about the concord to elect the Pope, Last Judgment scene. Visually responding to so he's painted this just a couple of decades after Martin Luther posts his 95 Poses in 1517. So he's having to respond to the two pillars of what become referred to as the Two Pillars of Protestant sola fide sola skritura the second one sola skritura by scripture alone The previous one Sola Fide. All you have to do is say, I believe that Jesus, you're my Lord and Savior and you're saved. Well the Catholic church is responsible because that's kind of a duh, no duh position.
Yeah. That's like, and? You just keep it there, or you're going to do, you're to take the ball and run with it then. So the idea is that if one wishes to share in the Resurrection of Christ, as a disciple, one must share in the life of Christ, which includes ultimately suffering and death.
Speaker 0: Precisely. And you aren't necessarily guaranteed. You know, it's funny how sometimes Protestants will laugh that the Catholics can just go in for confession or reconciliation, whatever it's called now, And then that's it. To which I respond, well, you think that all you have to do is be saved. Catholics say, that's part of it, your life, your addition of St.
Peter. Are you worthy? They don't have the notion of purgatory. They don't recognize Mary. They don't recognize I believe that for you to understand the differences in the faith actually concretizes your faith even better because you have to know what you believe in.
You just can't say it's not like being a Yankees fan. All you gotta do is buy a ticket, show up, and know when to root. It's not like that for you to connect yourself. And if those watching, and I forgot to say this, Professor Walters here gives the most exquisite tours of the Vatican, his organization, his site, Vati Land, which we will have here, is look at what he knows. Have you ever said in your life, I don't know.
Beats that all out of me. I don't know. You've never shown. Either that or you're just making it up, which I kid, of course. I know you're not.
But your encyclopedic knowledge of this, is this part of your academia, your academic studies, your academe? Or is something else? How do you know?
Speaker 1: No. It's pretty well, I have no life.
Speaker 0: You should be a cardinal.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You'd be It's just a lifetime. Know, I take a cue from The better the teacher, the better the student. Never stop being a student. You never stop learning.
You never stop wanting to learn. You never stop humbly admitting when you're in error, inaccurate, imprecise and trying to be more so. And it's a constant process.
Speaker 0: I think, though, the thing that is the most important is that look at all of the rules. I always go back to this hypothetical of somebody from another planet who comes here and I'm saying, Listen to this man. There are scholars, just like in the Yeshivas, and there are Jewish scholars study the Talmud and the Torah, they spend their lives dissecting questions of hypotheticals. The amount of lore, doctrinal history is mind boggling in terms of just a Catholic church. And yet, just like in our case, it's amazing what you can get away with.
Think about assassinations, think about coup d'etat, stolen elections, whatever your particular affiliation is. We believe that whenever there is some type of a blatant error, that somebody rings a bell and it stopped, that there's some internal dead man switch that says, Oh no, you don't. You can't do this. Surely somebody is going to find out and complain and call the papers. They know nothing about it because they're lulled into this Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a five alarm fire in Italy. Again, Cholamchie, who might be helpful if you want, I know he'll be fine with it. He has a lot of, you know, why reinvent the wheel? He has a lot of good, in English, little mini videos. There's three in particular I can send them if you want, maybe you want to attach them to the bottom of this.
Just explaining a lot of graphics so it's very visually helpful for people because there's a lot to wrap their mind around, I realize. So that might be helpful. But there's a five alarm fire, mean, you know, everybody's kind of panicking and really worried, those who existentially care about this stuff, here in Italy, as we ramp up to Wednesday. And it's not the end of everything, but it's kinda like, can there be a comeback? And I'm gonna wait.
I was gonna I was gonna do it now, maybe like a drop of last final bomb. I'm not. Let's wait and see what happens. Okay. And then whatever does happen, I'll give you an update and Oh, please.
Where things now would stand at that
Speaker 0: point. It be important to me to ask you, are you a Catholic yourself?
Speaker 1: I was baptized the Roman Catholic.
Speaker 0: Okay. That's all. I'm just curious because it would be for me, for example, if I were to be some expert of, let's say, Jewish lore or somebody says, What are you Jewish? No. But then again, you don't have to be a woman to be a gynecologist.
That's a bad example. But I'm just curious because I have respect for I mean, if I can study the history of France and live in this country, it's the study the naked study of the of the of the history, which is so fascinating to me. What is your expertise? You you are a professor. What do you teach?
Speaker 1: Well, I've taught the courses over the fifteen years. I've taught Latin, I've taught ancient Roman history, comparative world religions, courses in the New Testament. But over the past several years, two courses in particular have become very popular. One is called The Popes of Mystery of the Catholic Church and the other is called Mystics, Saints and Studied in Medieval Catholic Theology. So I mentioned last time my CV, so if your audience didn't watch that previous interview, they can go back to the beginning where you asked me about my CV.
Right. Within all that, my Ph. D. Thesis was in something called philology, the theological aspect is called something called ecclesiology, which is the logical rational principle of this thing we call the church. The structure of the church, its governance, its formation, its grassroots, everything.
Speaker 0: And philology is almost like a love of knowledge.
Speaker 1: An intimate love of logical, rational principles communicated via words. In other words, what does a word really mean?
Speaker 0: Why is Latin important? Why would you advocate learning it? What does it do?
Speaker 1: Yeah, both Latin and Greek, but just for Latin's sake. Mean, number one, it's what every modern Romance language, but also English, which is now the ironically lingua franca of the world Mhmm. Is based is based on. It's what allows English to be, in my opinion, the premier language to communicate in in the world, phonetic alphabetized language, because it has a vast, vast vocabulary. And the study of Latin, number one, it disciplines the mind to think critically, logically, rationally.
Mhmm. Just the going about learning it. And number two, it suddenly opens up, you know, once you understand what a word really means, it completely opens up your horizon and makes you understand things in a very different light.
Speaker 0: When I went to a Jesuit high school, I took Latin and I found out a number of things. First, it was to me the ultimate FU to my friends with their Spanish and French. I don't need this. Everybody else said, that's number one. Because we we we also thought we were just different.
Right. There is a sound to it. There's something. It sounds almost everything sounds profound. And the Catalina How are we going to put up with it?
But it was an even profound the pledge of allegiance. Notice I say, vexolo. I speak classical Latin, not that churchy. What's your phrase for church Latin?
Speaker 1: What is it called? Spaghetti Latin.
Speaker 0: Spaghetti Latin. Spaghetti Latin. Yeah. And also, I know most people get who and whom and correct. This teaches you.
When you talk about plupers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, grammar.
Speaker 0: Yes, grammar. In order for you to speak and when you speak any language where the adjective comes after. You go through the sentence and then at the end, I was like, I'm making all this stuff out of the way and now I'll worry about the descriptors. The dative case and conjugation of verbs. And aside from that, I loved it.
I never, ever, ever. And you don't have to necessarily know something to open up your mind and to stretch it. I always give the analogy of somebody who's about to run will put themselves into contortions that they will never mimic or replicate during a run, but being able to So, Latin is just It's well worth the effort as far as I'm concerned. Maybe I'm biased.
Speaker 1: Right. Yeah. No, no, I 100% agree. My doctoral research was on the, what we call, well, just an analysis of one word in Latin from the first time it appears in the Latin language until the time of Constantine, the word being unitas, meaning oneness. And this is how the ecclesiology, the structure of the Church comes into play, as well as the Trinity, Trinitarian theology, all sorts of stuff.
It's useless to mow the lawn. You want to uproot the weeds. And so that's also part of my approach.
Speaker 0: Is the shape, the attitude of Rome to live in Rome based upon what you've seen? The crime, immigration, the attitude, the flavor. What's Rome like now? When in Rome?
Speaker 1: Alright. Yeah. You know, correlation does not necessarily mean causation, but Right. And it's not it's not it's not just me, a lot of friends and colleagues, peers, acquaintances. It's I you know, strangely enough, since 2013 and very recently now, I don't like the feel.
Speaker 0: Isn't it something how the derivative effects of something seemingly it's the old butterfly wings and how something seemingly disconnected can affect, can trickle down, to use a Reagan term, I guess, into effect. I feel exactly the same way. We have a thing here in New York, this notion Giuliani provided or made it popular was it's the broken windows effect where Wilson and whatever had this idea that if you have a neighborhood where there's always this one storefront with a broken window and it's never fixed, it gives people the impression people don't care about it. Whereas you go after little pieces of crime and it shows people they mean business. So little things, 100%, What about the notion of heterogeneity?
Some people are suggesting that when you have influxes, and they always focus sometimes on African, I think there might be, I don't want to use the word racist, but put it this way, other non Roman white Europeans don't catch their attention. But what happens when a culture, perhaps by virtue of dilution or I'm not gonna use words like contamination, but what happens when the Roman culture and the Italian culture and the way of life, when it is affected by influxes non Roman?
Speaker 1: There's a point where you reach, what would you call it, supersaturation, over saturation levels. And maybe it can be repaired, maybe not. So that's where we're at here.
Speaker 0: Well, Eric Thaddeus Walters, Professor Eric Thaddeus Walters, I will have everything in the description portion up to and including the link from last time. I will put your YouTube channel. And if somebody wanted to enlist your services for Vatty land to get a you are make people understand this. You're just not some dude with a little sign that says tours. Are certified.
Explain your bona fides when it comes to giving
Speaker 1: Yeah, well again, going back Yeah, when you asked me about just how do I have all this knowledge and stuff, number one, I never stopped learning and studying, doing my own research, continued research trying to publish stuff. And number two, just because of, you know, all of that, the amalgamation over time of both doing it simultaneously while, you know, a postgraduate student, and it just kind of snowballs forward and never ends. It's just that so, you know, Vatican Blue does.
Speaker 0: But you are also given some kind of a distinction, are you not? You have some type of a Yeah,
Speaker 1: Vatican Vatican Blue Guide does. So there's thousands and thousands of guides all over Italy. Here in Rome, there's at least a few thousand legitimately licensed guides because here that's a big deal, you have to if you want to do it and not have problems, have to be licensed somehow. You can be licensed by a province, meaning like a county or a city or something like that. In this case, it's the Vatican itself.
Vatican blue eyed docents. In Italian, it's called or didactic operator, but it sounds more clear and clear to
Speaker 0: So you are you are a five star
Speaker 1: I'm not the only one, but yeah.
Speaker 0: Still, you have five star platinum diamond gold. Last question. As you can tell, I'm perennial liar. I always say, last question for about five or six times. Are you ever gonna come back to the Are you permanently Or do you consider yourself a Roman, an expat?
Where do you fit into this weird world that we live in?
Speaker 1: I I think I'm a stranger in a strange land wherever I go. I mean, you know, Rome Rome Rome really is Rome really is home. Last time I was physically back, set foot in The States was eight years ago, and that was for five days. And the time before that was eleven years earlier, so I don't get back much.
Speaker 0: And you couldn't wait to get back as soon as you when you first
Speaker 1: Well, used to ask me, you know, do you what do you miss from The States? And I I said Popeyes. And then the last time I went back the last time I went back, I was I had a layover in the Detroit Internet in the Detroit Airport. And I was in the international terminal, so I started the Popeyes, let's try that up. And it was not as I remembered, so I was disappointed.
Speaker 0: Yeah, the dirty rice just kind of loses its pronoun. I also love to if ever I make I have never had the pleasure, and if Mrs. Eldon and I go there, I'm going to call you up whether you like it or not. But I would always want to say let me see Rome the way you see it. I don't want to go to.
Don't forget the beaten path.
Speaker 1: A lot know a lot of a lot of my friend. A lot of my friends meaning Roman friends, I know Rome better than most of them. Like they ask me about, you know, directions or how to do that.
Speaker 0: I also want to find out things that drive you crazy, like cheese on fish and other We'll talk about that some other day. Professor Eric Thaddeus Walters, again, I will have all of your CV, your bona fides, endless. Let us talk again after the other
Speaker 1: shoe shoe And,
Speaker 0: and again, I want to thank you for your wisdom and your genius and your absolute encyclopedic knowledge. You have made this so incredibly important. Thank you so much, my friend.
Speaker 1: Sure. Thank you. All right. Thank
Speaker 0: you, sir.
@VRightResearch1 - V Right Research
@Jasper_Truth https://www.bitchute.com/video/UWSTmTHe8BEG Library reflection #BlackPope For entertainment purposes #VRightResearchLibrary
The Black Pope
Timing is everything.
Another previously banned presentation.
Unfortunately hard to read... product of the times.
bitchute.com
@BLP1776 - BloodLinePatriot
@Jasper_Truth Pope was a puppet and the Vatican is corrupt as hell. https://t.co/RmQOl0SVkQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Contradictory updates on Jorge Mario Gregorio's medical condition are raising concerns about Vatican communications. Some believe the Pope is already dead and the information is being concealed. The Vatican and the "Bergogleian deep Church" are allegedly in a panic to gather support among cardinals for a successor who will continue the "Bergogleian revolution," as some seek to bury their crimes with Bergoglio's.
In the United States, the US Bishops Conference is reportedly clashing with the Trump administration following a scandal involving the Agency for International Development, which has exposed the Catholic Church's alleged complicity in the "lucrative business of immigration." It is considered necessary to prevent the progressive hierarchy from ensuring that Bergoglio's successor is one of their own. Before Bergoglio's departure, it is essential to shed light on his alleged misdeeds and the occupation of the Catholic Church by a corrupt hierarchy aiming to destroy it from within.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The contradictory updates being given about Jorge Mario Gregorio's medical condition cast a disturbing light on the way Vatican communications are being managed. There are those who believe that the Pope is already deceased and that this fact is being kept hidden from the public. It is clear that the Vatican and the Bergogleian deep Church are in a panic, and we do everything to gather the consensus of the cardinals together around the name of someone will continue the Bergogleian revolution. There are those who have every interest in bearing their own crimes along with those of Bergoglio. While in The United States there is a head on clash of the US Bishops Conference against the Trump administration.
After the scandal regarding the funds of the Agency for International Development has brought to light the complicity of the Catholic Church in the lucrative business of immigration. It is necessary to prevent the progressive hierarchy from ensuring that one of their own is Berghou's successor, that is, another usurper on the throne of Peter will be their heir and continuator of the previous one. Before hammering the final nails into Bergoglio's coffin, it is therefore essential and urgent that the light be shed on the usual patient he perpetrated and on the occupation of the Catholic church by a corrupt and treacherous hierarchy whose sole aim is to destroy her from within.
@Red_Pill_US - Red Pill USA
Jordan Maxwell once claimed that, "The church, government, politics are all interconnected, and the secret societies have been manipulating them all from day one." Is it true what he says here? 🤔 https://t.co/tnFL3HJzq5
Video Transcript AI Summary
When students graduate from university, they are gradually indoctrinated. The mortarboard is a symbol of masonry. All universities and colleges in the Western world operate under the Vatican.
Sending children to college means sending them to a Jesuit Catholic dominated ancient Roman Empire system where they will be indoctrinated into a system of religion, politics, and theology. Popes were often homosexuals, murderers, and offspring of bankers. The Vatican system was a banking system.
The uniform commercial code is based on the old Vatican canon law. The church, government, and politics are interconnected, and secret societies have been manipulating them from day one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When kids graduate from university, incidentally, word graduate comes from two words, gradually indoctrinate. So consequently, when you graduate, you come out with a square mortar board. The mortarboard is a symbol of masonry. This is why you go to college to get a degree. Consequently, you need to understand that all universities and colleges in the Western world operate under the Vatican.
All universities and colleges. So if you wanna save your money to send your kids to college, just remember you're sending them to a Jesuit Catholic dominated ancient Roman Empire system whereby your your children are to gradually be indoctrinated into a system of religion, politics, and theology. As far back as the fourth, fifth, and sixth century, we know that the escapades of the popes, many of them were homosexuals, most of them were murderers. They were all offsprings of bankers. The entire Vatican system was a banking system.
Today, the uniform commercial code's based on the old Vatican canon law. So once you understand, the church, government, politics are all interconnected, and the secret societies have been manipulating them all from day one.