reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore: "Al Gore said [that] because CO2 and temperature is so strongly correlated, CO2 must be the cause of the temperature increase. Al Gore had it exactly backwards. There's an 800 year leg between the temperature changing and the CO2 changing, and the effect never comes before the cause." Full talk: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lX1z_6pvM-Q… #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #Agenda21 #Agenda2030
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over the past 400,000 years, there have been four interglacial periods and four glacial maximums. It takes 80,000 years to transition from an interglacial period to a glacial maximum, but only 10,000 years to come back out of it. The Milankovitch cycle, influenced by the gravity of Jupiter, affects the tilt of the Earth and the shape of its orbit, which in turn impacts temperature. Contrary to Al Gore's claim, CO2 does not cause temperature increase; rather, temperature warming the oceans leads to the release of CO2, while cooling oceans absorb it. The Vostok ice core record shows an 800-year lag between temperature and CO2 changes. Currently, CO2 levels are rising due to human emissions, but it is not causing a corresponding increase in temperature.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the last 400000 years. These are the 4 interglacial periods on the top and the 4 glacial maximums on the bottom. You will note that it takes 80,000 years to go from the interglacial period into the glacial maximum and only 10000 years to come back out of it. This is in the Milankovitch cycle. Al Gore said, it's obvious because c o two and temperature are so strongly correlated that c o two must be the cause of the temperature increase.
How would the gravity of Jupiter and the Milankovitch cycles changing the tilt of the earth and the shape of the orbit affect c o two? No. That affects temperature. And when the oceans warm, they give off co2. And when the oceans cool, they absorb co2.
So Al Gore had it exactly backwards. The cause here is the temperature warming the oceans. There's an 800 year lag in this Vostok ice core record between the temperature changing and the CO2 changing. So this is pretty much solid, rock solid stuff. See where it says At the very end there, the year 2020, we're at 5th 4 115.
Now it's 420 PPM, the temperature has not followed the c o two up. The c o two is going up because of our emissions, but it is not causing the temperature to go up.
reSee.it AI Summary
Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn challenges the mainstream narrative that carbon dioxide controls world temperatures. He argues that actual data shows it's world temperatures that control the carbon dioxide concentration. Check out the source and visit Wide Awake Media for more content like this. #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Astrophysicist, Piers Corbyn, dispels the fairytale that carbon dioxide controls world temperatures: "The problem with the current climate change narrative is that it's false. It claims that carbon dioxide controls world temperatures, whereas actual data shows that it's world temperatures which control the carbon dioxide concentration." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=o8rGb87p260… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
Climate change theory is dismissed as a conspiracy theory in this video. The speaker argues that the current narrative is false, claiming that carbon dioxide does not control world temperatures. They believe that it is actually world temperatures that influence carbon dioxide levels. The speaker also accuses American and United Nations operations of manipulating data to make the past appear colder and the present warmer. They assert that satellite data shows the actual climate is cooling.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Climate change theory is a a climate change conspiracy theory, and it is completely stupid. The problem with the current climate change narrative is that it's false. It claims that carbon dioxide controlled or is the main forcer of world temperatures, whereas actual data shows that it's world temperatures which control the carbon dioxide concentration. CO2 does not have any effect what so ever. The actual climate is cooling, and that is shown by satellite data as opposed to the fraudulent data produced by the American and the United Nations operations, where they select data to make it look colder in the past and warmer in the present.
reSee.it AI Summary
Geologist Professor Ian Plimer debunks manmade climate change in just 2.5 minutes. Scientific literature lacks evidence linking human CO2 emissions to global warming. The push for human-induced global warming aims to dismantle society, empowering unelected individuals. Watch the full talk for more insights: [YouTube link]. Explore similar content at [website]. ClimateScam, ClimateCult, NetZero.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer, utterly demolishes the "man-made climate change" lie, in two and a half minutes: "No one can show from the scientific literature that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming... We have built this whole empire based on something that cannot be shown, and in fact you can show the opposite." "The whole move with human-induced global warming has got nothing to do with the environment. It's got everything to do with [the] deconstruction of our society, as a mechanism of unelected people gaining power." Full talk: https://youtube.com/watch?v=txQcX0fm5bs… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
Malcolm Roberts questioned the CSIRO about scientific papers proving that human emissions of carbon dioxide cause global warming. Despite asking scientists, journalists, and politicians for 25 years, no one has been able to provide evidence from scientific literature. Even if human emissions do drive global warming, they only account for 3% of total emissions, while the remaining 97% comes from natural sources like ocean degassing. This raises doubts about the entire premise of human-induced global warming. The speaker believes that the push for this concept is not about the environment but rather a means for unelected individuals to gain power. They express their frustration and promote their book, "Green Murder," as a direct challenge to those leading this movement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We had incentive estimates last year. Malcolm Roberts asked the CSIRO, can you please give me a few scientific papers that prove human emissions of carbon dioxide drive of global warming. Now I know Malcolm well, and he uses some of my questions that I feed him. And the CSIRO presented him with 1 scientific paper, and then it wasn't on the subject. So we asked them again, can you please show me that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming?
That's a trick question. We'll come to that. They couldn't. This is a question that I've been asking scientists around the world for 25 years. I've asked journalists this question.
I've asked politicians this question. It's no wonder I get canceled because no one can show from the scientific literature that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. Now let's imagine that I'm wrong. And once I was wrong, but I was mistaken. But let's imagine I was wrong.
And we say, okay, human emissions do drive global warming. Well, the total human emissions are 3% of the total emissions that we get on planet Earth. So if you can show that 3% of emissions drive global warming, you have to show that the 97% of natural emissions, which come from ocean degassing, don't drive global warming. That's never been shown. So we have built this whole empire based on something that cannot be shown.
And in fact, you can show the opposite. The whole move with human induced global warming has got nothing to do with the environment. It's got everything to do with deconstruction of the way we think and our society as a mechanism of unelected people gaining power. And I'm sick of it. And that's why I wrote this book, Green Murder.
It's a full frontal attack on those who are leading the charge.
reSee.it AI Summary
Contrary to climate alarmists, rising temperatures cause increased atmospheric CO2, not the other way around. The Earth's temperature is regulated by solar activity, and climate change has occurred long before humans. Globalist bodies like the UN and WEF exploit this to gain control. Net Zero policies should be scrapped immediately.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
MUST-WATCH: Contrary to propaganda spouted by climate alarmists, rising temperatures are the CAUSE of increased atmospheric CO2, not the other way around, and the temperature of the Earth is regulated by solar activity. The climate has always changed, long before humans got here, and it will continue to change long after we're gone, but globalist bodies like the UN and WEF want us to believe that humans are causing it, as a pretext to exert absolute totalitarian control over the entire planet. From the documentary, ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle’. Watch the full documentary here: https://wide-awake-media.com/great-global-warming-swindle For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
The ice core surveys in Antarctica show a correlation between carbon dioxide (CO2) and temperature, but the relationship is more complex than Al Gore suggests. The data reveals that temperature increases precede rises in CO2 levels by about 800 years. This indicates that temperature changes drive CO2 changes, not the other way around. Furthermore, carbon dioxide is a natural gas produced by all living things, and humans contribute only a small fraction of it compared to sources like volcanoes, animals, bacteria, and the oceans. The oceans, in particular, play a significant role in CO2 emissions and absorption, with warmer temperatures leading to more CO2 production. Earth's long climate history does not support the idea that CO2 determines global temperatures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The 1st ice cold survey took place in Vostok in the Antarctic. What it found, as Al Gore correctly points out, was a clear correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature.
Speaker 1: We're going back in time now 650,000 years. Here's what the temperature Has been on our earth. Now one thing that kinda jumps out at you is Do do they ever fit together? Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. The relationship is actually very complicated But there is one relationship that is far more powerful than all the others and it is this.
When there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets Warmer.
Speaker 0: Al Gore says the relationship between temperature and c o two is complicated. But he doesn't say what those complications are. In fact there was something very important in the ice core data that he failed to mention. Professor Ian Clark is a leading arctic paleoclimatologist who looks back into the earth's temperature record tens of millions of years.
Speaker 2: When we look at, climate on long scales, we're looking for geological material that actually records climate. If we're to take an ice sample, For example, we use isotopes to reconstruct temperature, but
Speaker 3: the atmosphere that's imprisoned in that ice, we liberate and then we look at the C02 content.
Speaker 0: Professor Clark and others have indeed discovered as Al Gore says, a link between carbon dioxide and temperature. But what Al Gore doesn't say, is that the link is the wrong way around.
Speaker 2: So here, we're looking at the ice core record from Vostok. And in
Speaker 3: the red, we see temperature going up from early time to later time at a very key interval when we came out of a glaciation. And we see the temperature going up. And then we see the CO2 coming up. CO2 lags behind that increase. It's got an 800 year lag.
So temperature is leading CO2 by 800 years.
Speaker 0: There have now been several major ice core surveys. Every one of them shows the same thing. The temperature rises or falls and then after a few 100 years, carbon dioxide follows.
Speaker 3: So obviously, carbon dioxide is not the cause of that warming. In fact, we can say that the warming produced the increase in carbon dioxide. C o two clearly cannot be causing temperature changes. It's The product of temperature, it's following temperature changes.
Speaker 4: The ice core record goes to the very heart of the problem we have here, they said if the CO 2 increases in the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas, then the temperature will go up. But the ice core record shows exactly the opposite. So the fundamental assumption, the most fundamental assumption of the whole theory of of climate change true to humans is is shown to be wrong.
Speaker 0: But how can it be that higher temperatures lead to more CO2 in the atmosphere? To understand this, we must first restate the obvious point that carbon dioxide is a natural gas produced by all living things. Few things annoy me more than to hear people talking about carbon dioxide as being a pollutant. You're made of carbon dioxide. I'm made of carbon dioxide.
Carbon dioxide is how living things grow. What's more, humans are not the main source of carbon dioxide.
Speaker 1: Humans produce a, small fraction in the single digits Percentage wise of the c o two that is produced in the atmosphere.
Speaker 0: Volcanoes produce more c o two each year than all the factories and cars and planes and other sources of man made carbon dioxide put together. More still comes from animals and bacteria which produced about a 150 gigatons of c o two each year compared to a mere 6 and a half gigatons from humans. An even larger source of c o two is dying vegetation from falling leaves, for example, in the autumn. But the biggest source of c o two by far is the oceans. Karl Wunsch is professor of oceanography at MIT.
He was also visiting professor in oceanography at Harvard University and University College London and a senior visiting fellow in mathematics and physics at the University of Cambridge. He is the author of 4 major textbooks on oceanography.
Speaker 2: The ocean is the major reservoir into which carbon dioxide goes when it comes out of the atmosphere Or to from which it is reemitted to the the atmosphere. If you heat the surface of the ocean, it tends to emit Carbon dioxide. So similarly, if you cool the ocean surface, the ocean can dissolve more Carbon dioxide.
Speaker 0: So the warmer the oceans, the more carbon dioxide they produce and the cooler they are, the more they suck in. But why is there a time lag of 100 of years between a change in temperature and a change in the amount of carbon dioxide going into or out of the sea? The reason is that oceans are so big and so deep, they take literally hundreds of years to warm up and cool down. This time lag means the oceans have what scientists call a memory of temperature changes.
Speaker 2: The ocean has a memory of past events, running out as far as 10000 years. So for example, if somebody says, oh, I'm seeing changes in the North Atlantic, this must mean that the climate system is changing. It may only mean that something happened in a remote part of the ocean decades or 100 of years ago whose effects are now beginning to show up in the North Atlantic.
Speaker 0: The current warming began long before people had cars or electric lights. In the past 150 years, the temperature has risen just is over half a degree Celsius. But most of that rise occurred before 1940. Since that time, the temperature has fallen for 4 decades and risen for 3. There is no evidence at all from Earth's long climate history that carbon dioxide has ever determined global temperatures.
Documentary: The Great Global Warming Swindle (2007) - Wide Awake Media
Everything you’ve ever been told about global warming is probably untrue. This film blows the whistle on the biggest swindle in modern history. We are told that "man-made global warming" is the biggest ever threat to mankind. There is no room for scientific doubt. Well, watch this film and make up your own mind.
wide-awake-media.com
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Retweet if Net Zero policies should be scrapped immediately! T-shirt available here: https://wideawake.clothing/collections/best-sellers-tshirts Currently running a 15% off sale. Hurry, ends at midnight tonight!
Best Sellers (T-Shirts)
Some of our best selling t-shirts. Click here for our best selling hoodies.
wideawake.clothing
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
404 Not Found
Wide Awake Clothing
wideawake.clothing
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore: "There is zero evidence that a CO2 increase in the atmosphere is the cause of rising temperature. None whatsoever." Full interview: https://youtube.com/watch?v=E5K5i5Wv7jQ… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many well-known individuals claim that we are in a climate emergency, but there is disagreement. One person argues that the world has been warming for centuries, even before the use of fossil fuels. They state that there is no evidence linking CO2 increase to rising temperatures, as temperatures were already increasing. They mention a graph from Central England, showing a steady rise of just over 1 degree Celsius in 320 years, which they believe is not significant. They also dispute claims that the current rate of temperature rise is unprecedented, citing similar rates in the past.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is an awful lot of well known people who appear to have credentials saying that we are in a climate emergency, which we are, aren't
Speaker 1: we? No, we are not in a climate emergency. These people want us to think that the world began in 18/50 when we started using fossil fuels, but for 150 years before that, it was also warming. There is zero evidence The CO2 increase in the atmosphere is the cause of rising temperature, none whatsoever, because it was already rising. And as I was about to say, during the 1st 150 years of rising out of 1700, there was a period of over 40 years Where the temperature increased more and faster than it has done since 1850, especially since 1950, when we were actually starting to put a significant amount more CO2 in the atmosphere post war.
And today, it's exponential. There's a wonderful graph, it's in my book, which shows the temperature record in Central England From 16/60 or so, when the first thermometer existed. So this is the longest thermometer record of temperature in the world, because they were invented in England. And so that shows a very steady continuous rise in temperature of a little over 1 degree Celsius in 3 20 years. It's not a big deal.
They keep saying it's never gone this fast, it's never risen this fast. That is a lie. It has risen this fast many times in the even recent past, especially from about 16/90 to about 17/30.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti
Full thread starts here:
reSee.it AI Summary
The climate change narrative is flawed. Evidence suggests global temperatures control carbon dioxide levels, not the other way around. This manipulation of truth and lies serves to expand their power.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn: "The problem with the current climate change narrative is that it is false. It claims that carbon dioxide controls the global temperature, while the evidence shows that it is the global temperatures that control the concentration of carbon dioxide ." They cleverly mixed truth and lies to expand their power.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Climate change theory is dismissed as a conspiracy theory in this video. The speaker argues that the current narrative is false, claiming that carbon dioxide does not control world temperatures. They believe that it is actually world temperatures that control carbon dioxide concentration. The speaker also suggests that satellite data proves the climate is cooling, while accusing American and United Nations operations of manipulating data to make the past appear colder and the present warmer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Climate change theory is a a climate change conspiracy theory, and it is completely stupid. The problem with the current climate change narrative is that it's false. It claims that carbon dioxide controls as far as the main foresight of world temperatures, whereas actual data shows that it's world temperatures which control carbon dioxide concentration. C o two does not have any effect whatsoever. The actual climate is cooling.
And that is shown by satellite data as opposed to the fraudulent data produced by the American and the United Nations operations where they select data to make it look colder in the past and warmer in the present.
reSee.it AI Summary
Australian geologist Professor Ian Plimer debunks the idea that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. He points out that there has never been a scientific correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide throughout history. In fact, past climate change events occurred when there was more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. This suggests that carbon dioxide does not cause global warming. Watch the full interview for more insights. #ClimateScam #NetZero
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Australian geologist, Professor Ian Plimer, utterly demolishes the "human-induced climate change" narrative, in under a minute: "No one has ever shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. It's never been shown scientifically." "And if we look back in time, we've never had a correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide. There's never been climate change driven by carbon dioxide. All we see is the exact opposite. And the opposite is we've had six great ice ages, each of which kicked off when you had more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than now. So it's obvious: carbon dioxide does not and cannot drive global warming." Full Interview: https://youtube.com/watch?v=AZwky0fKBGk… #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is no scientific evidence that human emissions of carbon dioxide cause global warming. Despite extensive research, no correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide has been found throughout history. In fact, the opposite is true. We have experienced six major ice ages in the past, all of which occurred when there was more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than there is now. Therefore, it is clear that carbon dioxide does not and cannot drive global warming.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No one has ever shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. It's never been shown scientifically. And I have asked and asked and asked for this information. I've been searching the literature. I cannot find it.
So the whole fundamentals are wrong. And if we look back in time, and as someone who does deal with history and archaeology and geology, We've never had a correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide. There's never been climate change driven by carbon dioxide. All we see is the exact opposite. The opposite is we've had 6 great ice ages Yeah.
Each of which kicked off when you had more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than now. So it's obvious. Carbon dioxide does not and cannot drive global warming.
reSee.it AI Summary
Geologist Ian Plimer explains that if we measure from the Medieval and Roman Warmings, we have cooled about five degrees in the last 4000 years. Watch his full talk here: youtube.com/watch?v=txQcX0fm5bs. For more content, visit wide-awake-media.com.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "We have been cooling down for the last 4000 years. It's all about when you start the measurements. If you take measurements from the Medieval Warming, we've cooled about five degrees since then. If you take measurements from the Roman Warming, we've cooled about five degrees." Full talk: https://youtube.com/watch?v=txQcX0fm5bs… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over the past 4000 years, the planet has been cooling down. In the last 38 years, there has been no change in temperature. In the last 150 years, there have been 3 warming periods and 3 cooling periods, resulting in a total warmth of about 0.6 degrees Celsius. The warming after the little ice age in 1850 is expected, and if measurements are taken from that time, we have been warming. However, if measurements are taken from the medieval warming or the Roman warming, we have actually been cooling by about 5 degrees. So, when someone says it's warming, the question to ask is, since when?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have been cooling down for the last 4000 years. So people say, oh, the planet's warming. Well, it's all about when you start the measurements. If we look at the last 38 years, there has been no change in temperature. If we look in the last 150 years, we've had 3 warming periods and 3 cooling periods with a total warmth of about 0.6 degrees Celsius.
Now I wonder why it warms. I mean, 1850, what happened then? Oh, yes. That was the end of the little ice age. Do you think it's gonna warm or cool after a little ice age?
Of course, it's gonna warm. So if you start taking measurements from 1850 in the industrial revolution, we have been warming. If you take measurements from the medieval warming, we've been cooling. We've cooled about 5 degrees since then. If you take measurements from the Roman warming, we've cooled about 5 degrees.
So as soon as someone tells you, oh, it's warming, the reply you give is, since when?
reSee.it AI Summary
Geologist Ian Plimer argues that the Earth has been cooling for the past 4000 years. Depending on the starting point, we have cooled about five degrees since the Medieval and Roman Warmings. Watch his full talk for more details. Visit wide-awake-media.com for similar content.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "We have been cooling down for the last 4000 years. It's all about when you start the measurements. If you take measurements from the Medieval Warming, we've cooled about five degrees since then. If you take measurements from the Roman Warming, we've cooled about five degrees." Full talk: https://youtube.com/watch?v=txQcX0fm5bs Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over the past 4000 years, the planet has been cooling down. In the last 38 years, there has been no change in temperature. In the last 150 years, there have been 3 warming periods and 3 cooling periods, resulting in a total warmth of about 0.6 degrees Celsius. The warming after the Little Ice Age in 1850 was expected, and since then, we have been warming. However, if we consider measurements from the medieval and Roman warmings, we have actually cooled about 5 degrees. So, when someone claims it's warming, the question to ask is, "since when?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have been cooling down for the last 4000 years. So people say, oh, the planet's warming. Well, it's all about when you start the measurements. If we look at the last 38 years, there has been no change in temperature. If we look in the last 150 years, we've had 3 warming periods and 3 cooling periods with a total warmth of about 0.6 degrees Celsius.
Now I wonder why it warms. I mean 18/50, what happened then? Oh yes, that was the end of the Little Ice Age. Do you think it's going to warm or cool after a little ice age? Of course, it's going to warm.
So if you start taking measurements from 1850 in the Industrial Revolution, we have been warming. If you take measurements from the medieval warming, we've been cooling. We've cooled about 5 degrees since then. If you take measurements from the Roman warming, we've cooled about 5 degrees. So as soon as someone tells you, oh, it's warming, the reply you give is, since when?
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
A reformed ex-climate alarmist challenges the climate crisis narrative, highlighting the lack of consistent correlation between CO2 and Earth's temperature. With historical evidence of higher CO2 levels and colder conditions, the foundation of the climate scare appears weak, relying on unreliable models. Explore more at wide-awake-media.com.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Reformed ex-climate alarmist: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions... There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Source: https://youtu.be/Qdg4uQW8Dlg Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tom Harris, Executive Director of the International Climate Science Coalition, argues that the climate change movement is a scam. He believes that the focus should be on debunking the science behind climate change. While some argue that countries like Canada should set an example by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, Harris claims that there is no climate crisis. He shares his experience as an aerospace engineer and how a professor challenged his beliefs about the runaway greenhouse effect on Venus. This encounter led him to question the correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature. Harris highlights a book called "Climate Change Reconsidered" that contains thousands of references debunking the foundation of the climate scare, which he claims is based on faulty models.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most maddening part of all of that though is that these policies, they're not just destroying lives, they're rooted in lies, all of them. Our next guest was once a Climate Alarmist, but now says the entire movement is quote, a scam. Tom Harris is the Executive Director of the International Climate Science Coalition, He joins me now. Tom, good to see you tonight. Now you actually say the only way to get rid of this is to go after the science of Climate Change.
Explain.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. A lot of people will say, well, you know, Canada, for example, puts out so little greenhouse gas emissions That we shouldn't, we shouldn't actually try to reduce it because China is double the United States. Well, the trouble is people argue that, well, yes, but we have to set An example to the world and we have to be good citizens and all that sort of thing. So they're using these arguments quite often that China's double the emissions to the US etcetera. But but the real underlying thing is that there is no climate crisis you know I was originally an aerospace engineer and I would give Speeches and I wrote articles.
I wrote one in the Ottawa Citizen about comparative planetology, how studying the planets helps us understand the Earth better. And I used the example of the runaway greenhouse effect on Venus. I said this could happen on the Earth if we don't reduce carbon dioxide. Well a local professor of Carleton University, professor of geology, he liked my article so much he used it in his course on climate change And but he said to the students, but that part about Venus is wrong. What happened on Venus cannot physically happen on the Earth and he explained why.
Now I thought, who is this climate change denier? Well he invited me into his lab and he showed me the geologic history that he and others are finding, And they found no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and earth's temperature. At times CO2 was 1300% of today And we were stuck in very cold conditions, so it was all over the board. So I started wondering, well, maybe he's right. He exposed me to a lot of people Who actually showed me that there are thousands of scientists.
And here's a book actually that illustrates that. It's called Climate Change Reconsidered, And this is on climatechangereconsider.org. There are thousands of references here which talk about the fact There is no foundation to the climate scare. It's all based on models that don't work.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Astrophysicist, Piers Corbyn, dispels the fairy tale that CO2 controls the temperature of the planet: "The problem with the current climate change narrative is that it's false. It claims that carbon dioxide controls world temperatures, whereas actual data shows that it's world temperatures which control the carbon dioxide concentration." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=o8rGb87p260 Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
Climate change theory is dismissed as a conspiracy theory in this video. The speaker argues that the current narrative is false, claiming that carbon dioxide does not control world temperatures. They believe that it is actually world temperatures that control the concentration of carbon dioxide. The speaker also accuses American and United Nations operations of manipulating data to make it appear colder in the past and warmer in the present. They assert that satellite data shows the actual climate is cooling.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Climate change theory is a a climate change conspiracy theory, and it is completely stupid. The problem with the current climate change narrative is that it's false. It claims that carbon dioxide controlled or is the main forcer of world temperatures, whereas actual data shows that it's world temperatures which control the carbon dioxide concentration. CO2 does not have any effect what so ever. The actual climate is cooling, and that is shown by satellite data as opposed to the fraudulent data produced by the American and the United Nations operations, where they select data to make it look colder in the past and warmer in the present.
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, dismisses human-induced global warming as a fabrication. He argues that the scientific method has not proven carbon dioxide's role in warming the Earth. Moore believes that future evidence will expose the climate change hysteria as baseless.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore: Human-induced global warming is a "complete fabrication". "The scientific method has not been applied in such a way as to prove that carbon dioxide is causing the Earth to warm… I am firmly of the belief that the future will show that this whole hysteria over climate change was a complete fabrication." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NzVMSxszudo Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
Carbon dioxide is often seen as a pollutant, but I believe it is actually essential for life on Earth. It is a good thing that we are increasing its levels in the atmosphere because it was running low before. However, there is no definitive proof that CO2 is causing serious problems. As a student of science, I know that the scientific method has not been used to prove that carbon dioxide is causing global warming. In the future, people may look back and realize that the efforts to change energy policies based on cutting this gas were unnecessary. I firmly believe that the climate change hysteria is a fabrication.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of my missions is to turn on its head the idea that carbon dioxide is a pollutant and somehow dangerous. When in fact, it is the most important nutrient for all life on earth, and without it, this would be a dead planet. So I say not only is carbon dioxide good, it is essential, And it's a good thing that we are putting some more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere because it was running low before we came along. If we had definitive proof that CO2 was causing serious problems and we could prove it, don't you think they would write that down on a piece of somewhere so people could read it. They don't have definitive proof, period, in science.
I'm a student of the philosophy and history of science. And I know that the scientific method has not been applied in such a way as to prove that carbon dioxide is causing the earth to warm.
Speaker 1: You think in a few years, say, 50 years from now, people go, that was a really stupid period in our history when we tried to change all our energy policies to cut this gas?
Speaker 0: I am and firmly of the belief that the future will show that this whole hysteria over climate change was a complete fabrication.
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn challenges the prevailing belief that CO2 regulates global temperatures. He argues that data suggests it is actually the world temperatures that influence the concentration of carbon dioxide. This perspective challenges the current climate change narrative. For more information, watch the video or visit the website.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Astrophysicist, Piers Corbyn, dispels the fairy tale that CO2 controls the temperature of the planet: "The problem with the current climate change narrative is that it's false. It claims that carbon dioxide controls world temperatures, whereas actual data shows that it's world temperatures which control the carbon dioxide concentration." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=o8rGb87p260 Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
Climate change theory is dismissed as a conspiracy theory in this video. The speaker argues that the current narrative is false, claiming that carbon dioxide does not control world temperatures. They believe that it is actually world temperatures that control the concentration of carbon dioxide. The speaker discredits the data produced by American and United Nations operations, accusing them of manipulating data to make the past appear colder and the present warmer. They assert that satellite data shows the actual climate is cooling.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Climate change theory is a a climate change conspiracy theory, and it is completely stupid. The problem with the current climate change narrative is that it's false. It claims that carbon dioxide controlled or is the main forcer of world temperatures, whereas actual data shows that it's world temperatures which control the carbon dioxide concentration. CO2 does not have any effect what so ever. The actual climate is cooling, and that is shown by satellite data as opposed to the fraudulent data produced by the American and the United Nations operations, where they select data to make it look colder in the past and warmer in the present.
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The climate isn't warmer than historical periods. Carbon dioxide levels are the lowest in 600 million years. Geologist Randall Carlson debunks human-induced climate change in under a minute. Check out more content at wide-awake-media.com.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
"The climate right now is no warmer than it's been many times throughout history. [It's] now the lowest that carbon dioxide has been in 600 million years." American geologist, Randall Carlson, perfectly summarises the "human-induced climate change" hoax, in under a minute. Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the current climate is not warmer than in the past, citing a baseline of the lowest carbon dioxide levels in 600 million years. They claim that the IPCC's 1992 report showed the medieval warm period was warmer than the present, but subsequent reports removed this information. The speaker suggests that a contrived graph called the Hochschies was used to flatten the temperature data and add an upward trend. They believe that those who challenge this narrative receive little media coverage. Additionally, they mention the significant amount of money invested in climate change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The climate right now is no warmer than it's been many times throughout history. Our our baseline is now the lowest the carbon dioxide has been in 600,000,000 years. As far as, temperature change, the IPCC's first report of 1992 showed that the middle medieval warm period was warmer than the present. Well, this didn't fit the narrative. So by the time the 1996 report came out, It was a a completely contrived graph called the Hochschies.
So what they did was they got rid of the medieval warm period and the little ice age. And so when the instead of the graph doing this, they flattened it out, and then they added instrumental Record on the end that looks like it's going way up. The point is is that the people that are calling them out on it are not getting the the media coverage. You know? Because look.
At this point, there's 1,000,000,000 of dollars going into the whole climate change
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer debunks the notion of man-made global warming. He asserts that there is no scientific evidence linking human carbon dioxide emissions to global warming. Throughout history, there has been no correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide levels. In fact, ice ages occurred when carbon dioxide levels were higher than today. It is clear that carbon dioxide does not drive global warming. Watch the full interview for more details.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
"If we look back in time, we've never had a correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide." Geologist, Prof. Ian Plimer, lays the "man-made global warming" fairy tale to rest, in under a minute. "No one has ever shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. It's never been shown scientifically." "If we look back in time, we've never had a correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide. There's never been climate change driven by carbon dioxide. All we see is the exact opposite. And the opposite is we've had six great ice ages, each of which kicked off when you had more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than now. So it's obvious: carbon dioxide does not and cannot drive global warming." Full Interview: https://youtube.com/watch?v=AZwky0fKBGk Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is no scientific evidence that human emissions of carbon dioxide cause global warming. Despite extensive research, no correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide has been found throughout history. In fact, the opposite is true. We have experienced six major ice ages, all of which occurred when there was more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than there is now. Therefore, it is clear that carbon dioxide does not and cannot drive global warming.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No one has ever shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. It's never been shown scientifically. And I have asked and asked and asked for this information. I've been searching the literature. I cannot find it.
So the whole fundamentals are wrong. And if we look back in time, and as someone who does deal with history and archaeology and geology, we've never had a correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide. There's never been climate change driven by carbon dioxide. All we see is the exact opposite. The opposite is we've had 6 great ice ages, each of which kicked off when you had more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than now.
So it's obvious carbon dioxide does not and cannot drive global warming.
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Australian senator Malcolm Roberts challenges the link between human-produced carbon dioxide and temperature. He argues that evidence supporting this connection is lacking. Roberts delivers a speech in the Australian parliament, shedding light on what he calls the #ClimateScam. For more details, watch the full speech on YouTube or subscribe to the newsletter for daily updates.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
"No one has been able to prove to me that human-produced carbon dioxide affects temperature... because they can't. They can't provide that evidence." Australian senator, Malcolm Roberts, drops some serious #ClimateScam truth bombs in the Australian parliament. Full speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSzDihp5YA4 Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Carbon dioxide is essential for vegetation and life on Earth. It makes up just 0.04% of the atmosphere and is classified as a trace gas. It is not toxic or harmful to the environment, but rather beneficial for plants. Nature produces 97% of carbon dioxide annually, and humans have little control over its levels. Despite increased human production, global temperatures have remained flat for 28 years. Natural variation is a normal part of cycles in temperature, rainfall, and storms. The speaker suggests that politicians are involved in a climate fraud, benefiting financially from the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Carbon dioxide is the lifeblood of vegetation on this planet. No one has been able to prove to me that human produced carbon dioxide affects temperature more than natural variation does because they can't, they can't provide that evidence. We are exhaling it. Every one of us in this chamber is exhaling it. Every human, every animal is exhaling it.
And in breathing, we all animals including koalas multiply the concentration of carbon dioxide 100 to 125 times. We take in carbon dioxide from the atmosphere at 0.04%. We exhale it at 4% to 5%. We've increased the concentration 100 to 125 times. Carbon dioxide is essential for all life on earth.
This is a fact sheet on carbon dioxide. It's just 0.04% of earth's air, 4 100th of 1%, 4 100th of a percent. It's scientifically classified as a trace gas because there is bugger all of it. It's non toxic, not noxious. Senator Hanson Young called it toxic.
That is straight out wrong. It's highly beneficial to and essential for plants. Greenhouses inject the stuff into greenhouses to simulate the growth of plants. In the past, when carbon dioxide levels in this planet were 4 times higher than today and they have been 135 times higher than today. Naturally, in the past, fairly recent, it's resulted in earth flourishing.
Nature produces 97% of the carbon dioxide produced annually on our planet. It does not discolor the air. It does not impair the quality of water or soil. It does not degrade the environment nor impair its usefulness nor render it offensive. It's not a pollutant.
It does not harm ecosystems and is essential for ecosystems. It does not harm plants and animals. It's essential for plants and animals. We do not control the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. We couldn't even if we wanted to.
In 2009, after the global financial crisis, in 2020, during the COVID mismanagement, we cause severe recessions around the world, globally. All of a sudden, the use of hydrocarbon fuels, coal oil and natural gas decreased dramatically. And what happened to the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere? Did it start going down? No.
Did it even inflect slightly and decrease the rate of increase? No. It continued increasing. Why? Because nature controls the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
There has been massive increase in human production of carbon from China, India, Brazil, Europe, Russia, Asia, America, yet temperatures have been flat, flat for 28 years, not warming, not cooling, flat. And the trend during the massive industrialization during the 2nd World War and the post war economic boom saw temperatures from 1936 to 1976 fall. Over 40 years of massive industrialization, the longest temperature trend in the last 160 years cooled. Remember the predictions we were going to be in for an ice age. In the 1880s and 1890s in our country, temperatures were warmer by far.
Variation in everything in nature is natural. Inherent natural variation within larger cycles of increasing and decreasing temperature and rainfall, drought cycles, storm cycles and every uptick is heralded as catastrophic and every downtick is suddenly ignored. What's driving this political scam, this climate fraud? Ignorant, dishonest and gutless politicians enabling scanners making money from it.
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Renowned scholar Thomas Sowell questions the #ClimateScam, highlighting that temperatures rose before the increase in carbon dioxide. He criticizes the suppression of opposing views by those advocating for global warming. Watch his insightful interview here: [source link]. Stay informed by subscribing to our Telegram channel and newsletter for daily updates.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
One of the world's most respected scholars, Thomas Sowell, on the #ClimateScam: "Temperatures went up first, and then there was the increase in carbon dioxide. You can’t say that A causes B if B happens first... But [the scientists] who are pushing global warming are doing their damndest to make sure that those who believe the opposite don't get heard in the public." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=rweblFwt-BM Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Public intellectuals manufacture demand for their services by making alarming predictions and offering solutions to problems. Global warming is seen as an example of this, with climate scientists creating a crisis and scaring the public to generate funding for their research initiatives. However, there are scientists who believe the opposite and are silenced by those pushing the global warming narrative. It is suggested that climate scientists should be more transparent and push the data out to the public, but there is no incentive for them to do so. Speaking out against the mainstream view could jeopardize their funding and career prospects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Again intellectuals in society, there is a spontaneous demand from the larger society for the end products of engineering, medical, and scientific professions. But the demand for public intellectuals is largely manufactured by the public intellectuals themselves. Yes. Explain that. How do they manufacture demand for their own services?
Speaker 1: Well, one thing is by making alarming predictions, offering solutions to our problems?
Speaker 0: What do you make of Global Warming?
Speaker 1: I think it's a classic example of the need For Crusades. Now, people many people are shocked by these EBLs. I'm not at all shocked by them. I read the original UN study years ago, And I was just curious as to how they were gonna deal with the question that the, temperatures went up first, and then there was the increase in carbon dioxide. Right.
Because you can't say that a causes b, if b happened first. And so I read this and I could see they were they were tip Towing through the tulips and the way they phrase things and so forth, they couldn't confront that. And and now we're finding out, that they knew Don well, they couldn't deal with all the evidence.
Speaker 0: So it fits the pattern of a group of intellectuals, science, climate scientists who are, have a very narrow competency, See suddenly proclaiming that there's a crisis scaring the rest of us, thereby creating a demand for their services.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Not as Science, climate scientists alone, but as a kind of high priestly cast that can tell us all how to live and save the entire planet. And in the meantime generate 1,000,000,000 of dollars worth of government programs to fund their research initiatives. So, are you it's a racket.
Speaker 1: Yes. Alright. But again, you have to take account of the ability of human beings to rationalize. I'm sure there are scientists out there who believe some or much of what they are saying. And there are other scientists who believe the opposite.
But the ones who are pushing Global warming are doing their damndest to make sure that those who believe the opposite don't get heard in the public.
Speaker 0: So wouldn't there shouldn't there be Some large ish body of climate scientists who say, the data really does suggest that that we're headed into trouble here. But precisely because my saying so as a climate scientist will look like special pleading. We as a community of scientists should be even more careful about being completely transparent, pushing the data out to the public. They should overcome the hurdle that that it looks like self pleading. Why isn't that taking place?
Speaker 1: There's no pay off to that. Alright. Imagine yourself as an assistant professor in some department where your senior colleagues are going to vote on your pay among other things, have 1,000,000 of dollars in grants handed out To promote global warming, and you say just what what you've just now said. And they all say that this guy is incorrigible.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn challenges the notion that CO2 controls global temperatures. He argues that data suggests it's actually the other way around, with temperature influencing CO2 levels. This challenges the current climate change narrative. For more information, watch the video or subscribe to our newsletter for updates.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Astrophysicist, Piers Corbyn, dispels the fairy tale that CO2 is the control knob for the temperature of the planet. "The problem with the current climate change narrative is that it's false. It claims that carbon dioxide controls world temperatures, whereas actual data shows that it's world temperatures which control the carbon dioxide concentration." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=o8rGb87p260 Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://www.wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
Climate change theory is dismissed as a conspiracy theory in this video. The speaker argues that the current narrative is false, claiming that carbon dioxide does not control world temperatures. They believe that it is actually world temperatures that control the concentration of carbon dioxide. The speaker also accuses American and United Nations operations of manipulating data to make it appear colder in the past and warmer in the present. They assert that satellite data shows the actual climate is cooling.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Climate change theory is a a climate change conspiracy theory, and it is completely stupid. The problem with the current climate change narrative is that it's false. It claims that carbon dioxide controls towards the main forcer of world temperatures, whereas actual data shows that it's world temperatures which control the carbon dioxide concentration. CO2 does not have any effect whatsoever. The actual climate is cooling, and that is shown by satellite data as opposed to the fraudulent data produced by the American and the United Nations operations, where they select data to make it look colder in the past and warmer in the present.
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
"The climate isn't warmer than historical periods. Carbon dioxide levels are now the lowest in 600 million years. Geologist Randall Carlson debunks the 'human-induced climate change' hoax. Stay informed on Telegram: t.me/realwideawakemedia and our newsletter: wide-awake-media.com."
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
"The climate right now is no warmer than it's been many times throughout history. [It's] now the lowest that carbon dioxide has been in 600 million years." American geologist, Randall Carlson, perfectly summarises the "human-induced climate change" hoax, in under a minute. Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://www.wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the current climate is not warmer than previous periods in history. They claim that carbon dioxide levels are at their lowest in 600 million years. They also mention that the medieval warm period was warmer than the present, but this information was removed from the IPCC reports to fit a specific narrative. The speaker believes that those who challenge this narrative are not receiving media attention. They highlight the significant amount of money invested in the climate change narrative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The climate right now is no warmer than it's been many times throughout history. Our our baseline is now the lowest the carbon dioxide has been in 600,000,000 years. As far as, temperature change, the IPCC's first report of 1992 showed that the middle medieval warm period was warmer than the present. Well, this didn't fit the narrative. So by the time the 1996 report came out, It was a a completely contrived graph called the Hockett's.
So what they did was they got rid of the medieval warm period and the little ice age. And so when the instead of the graph doing this, they flattened it out, and then they added instrumental Record on the end that looks like it's going way up. The point is is that the people that are calling them out on it are not getting the the media coverage. You know, because look. At this point, there's 1,000,000,000 of dollars going into the whole climate change narrative.
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
@GGMIAID - DreamQueen - #ObiDatti2023
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
"The climate right now is no warmer than it's been many times throughout history. [It's] now the lowest that carbon dioxide has been in 600 million years." American geologist, Randall Carlson, perfectly summarises the "human-induced climate change" hoax, in under a minute. Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://www.wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the current climate is not warmer than it has been in history, stating that the carbon dioxide levels are the lowest in 600 million years. They also mention that the medieval warm period was warmer than the present, but it was removed from the IPCC's reports to fit a specific narrative. The speaker criticizes the lack of media coverage for those who challenge this narrative, attributing it to the large amount of money invested in the climate change agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The climate right now is no warmer than it's been many times throughout history. Our our baseline is now the lowest the carbon dioxide has been in 600,000,000 years. As far as, temperature change, the IPCC's first report of 1992 showed that the middle medieval warm period was warmer than the present. Well, this didn't fit the narrative. So by the time the 1996 report came out, It was a a completely contrived graph called the Hockett's.
So what they did was they got rid of the medieval warm period and the little ice age. And so when the instead of the graph doing this, they flattened it out, and then they added instrumental Record on the end that looks like it's going way up. The point is is that the people that are calling them out on it are not getting the the media coverage. You know, because look. At this point, there's 1,000,000,000 of dollars going into the whole climate change narrative.
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
According to a reformed ex-climate alarmist, there is no climate crisis and no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature. They argue that the climate scare is based on models that don't work and that there is no foundation to support it.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Reformed ex-climate alarmist: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions... There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Source: https://youtu.be/Qdg4uQW8Dlg Follow our backup account: @wide_awake_news Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tom Harris, executive director of the International Climate Science Coalition, argues that the climate change movement is a scam. He believes that the focus should be on debunking the science behind climate change. Harris shares his experience as a former climate alarmist and how he changed his perspective after meeting a professor who explained the lack of correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature throughout history. He mentions a book called "Climate Change Reconsidered" that provides thousands of references debunking the foundation of the climate scare, which he claims is based on faulty models.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most maddening part of all of that though is that these policies, they're not just destroying lives. They're rooted in lies, all of them. Our next guest was once a climate alarmist, but now says the entire movement is quote, a scam. Tom Harris is the executive director of the International Climate Science Coalition. He joins me now.
Tom, good to see you tonight. Now you actually say the only way to get rid of this is to go after the science of climate change. Explain.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. A lot of people will say, well, you know, Canada, for example, puts out so little greenhouse gas emissions That we shouldn't, we shouldn't actually try to reduce it because China is double the United States. Well, the trouble is people argue that, well, yes, we have to set an example to the world and we have to be good citizens and all that sort of thing so they're using these arguments quite often that China's doubled the emissions to the US etc but but the real underlying thing is that there is no climate crisis you know I was originally an aerospace engineer And I would give speeches and I wrote articles. I wrote 1 in the Ottawa Citizen about comparative planetology, how studying the planets Helps us understand the Earth better. And I use the example of the runaway greenhouse effect on Venus.
I said this could happen on the Earth if we don't reduce carbon dioxide. Well, a local professor of carl at Carleton University, professor of geology, he liked my article so much he used it in his course on climate change. And but he said to the students, but that part about Venus is wrong. What happened on Venus cannot physically happen on the Earth and he explained why. Now I thought, who is this climate change denier?
Well he invited me into his lab and he showed me the geologic history that he and others are finding, And they found no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and earth's temperature. At times, CO2 was 1300% of today, And we were stuck in very cold conditions, so it was all over the board. So I started wondering, well, maybe he's right. He exposed me to a lot of people Who actually showed me that there are thousands of scientists. And here's a book actually that illustrates that.
It's called Climate Change Reconsidered, And this is on climatechangereconsider.org. There are thousands of references here which talk about the There is no foundation to the climate scare. It's all based on models that don't work.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The climate has been as warm in the past as it is now, and carbon dioxide levels are the lowest in 600 million years. Geologist Randall Carlson questions the idea of human-induced climate change. Follow @wide_awake_news for more and subscribe to their newsletter for daily updates.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
"The climate right now is no warmer than it's been many times throughout history. [It's] now the lowest that carbon dioxide has been in 600 million years." American geologist, Randall Carlson, perfectly summarises the "human-induced climate change" hoax, in under a minute. Follow our backup account: @wide_awake_news Subscribe to us on Telegram: t.me/realwideawakem… Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: http://wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the current climate is not warmer than previous periods in history. They claim that carbon dioxide levels are at their lowest in 600 million years. They also mention that the medieval warm period was warmer than the present, but it was removed from the IPCC's reports to fit a specific narrative. The speaker believes that those who criticize this manipulation of data are not receiving sufficient media coverage. They highlight the significant amount of money being invested in climate change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The climate right now is no warmer than it's been many times throughout history. Our our baseline is now the lowest that carbon dioxide has been in 600,000,000 years. As far as, temperature change, the IPCC's first report of 1992 showed that the middle medieval warm period was warmer than the present. Well, this didn't fit the narrative. So by the time the 1996 report came out, It was a a completely contrived graph called the Hochschies.
So what they did was they got rid of the medieval warm period and the little ice age. And so when the instead of the graph doing this, they flattened it out, and then they added instrumental A record on the end that looks like it's going way up. The point is is that the people that are calling them out on it are not getting the the media coverage. You know? Because look.
At this point, there's 1,000,000,000 of dollars going into the whole climate change
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
According to a reformed ex-climate alarmist, there is no climate crisis and no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature. The climate scare is based on models that don't work, with no foundation. Follow the author's backup account and subscribe to their newsletter for updates.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Reformed ex-climate alarmist: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions... There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work." Source: https://youtu.be/Qdg4uQW8Dlg Follow my backup account: @wide_awake_news Subscribe to me on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to my newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tom Harris, executive director of the International Climate Science Coalition, argues that the climate change movement is a scam. He believes that the focus should be on challenging the science behind climate change. Harris shares his experience as a former climate alarmist and how he was convinced by a professor at Carleton University that there is no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature. He mentions a book called "Climate Change Reconsidered" which provides thousands of references debunking the foundation of the climate scare.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most maddening part of all of that though is that these policies, they're not just destroying lives. They're rooted in lies, all of them. Our next guest was once a climate alarmist, but now says the entire movement is quote, a scam. Tom Harris is the executive director of the International Climate Science Coalition. He joins me now.
Tom, good to see you tonight. Now you actually say the only way to get rid of this is to go after the science of climate change. Explain.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. A lot of people will say, well, you know, Canada, for example, puts out so little greenhouse gas emissions That we shouldn't, we shouldn't actually try to reduce it because China is double the United States. Well, the trouble is people argue that, well, yes, we have to set an example to the world and we have to be good citizens and all that sort of thing so they're using these arguments quite often that China's doubled the emissions to the US etc but but the real underlying thing is that there is no climate crisis you know I was originally an aerospace engineer And I would give speeches and I wrote articles. I wrote 1 in the Ottawa Citizen about comparative planetology, how studying the planets Helps us understand the Earth better. And I use the example of the runaway greenhouse effect on Venus.
I said this could happen on the Earth if we don't reduce carbon dioxide. Well, a local professor of carl at Carleton University, professor of geology, he liked my article so much he used it in his course on climate change. And but he said to the students, but that part about Venus is wrong. What happened on Venus cannot physically happen on the Earth and he explained why. Now I thought, who is this climate change denier?
Well he invited me into his lab and he showed me the geologic history that he and others are finding, And they found no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and earth's temperature. At times, CO2 was 1300% of today, And we were stuck in very cold conditions, so it was all over the board. So I started wondering, well, maybe he's right. He exposed me to a lot of people Who actually showed me that there are thousands of scientists. And here's a book actually that illustrates that.
It's called Climate Change Reconsidered, And this is on climatechangereconsider.org. There are thousands of references here which talk about the There is no foundation to the climate scare. It's all based on models that don't work.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer discredits the idea of human-induced climate change, stating that no evidence has been presented to prove that human CO2 emissions drive global warming. He also questions the assumption that the 97% of emissions that are natural do not contribute to global warming. A link to his full talk is provided, along with additional subscription options.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
"Game over. We are dealing with a fraud". Geologist, Prof. Ian Plimer, utterly demolishes the "human-induced climate change" hoax, in just two minutes. "No one has ever shown that human emissions of CO2 drive global warming… And if it could be shown, then you would have to show that the 97% of emissions which are natural, do not drive global warming." Credit: @adhtvaus Full talk: https://watch.adh.tv/cpac-2022/season:2/videos/cpac-2022-prof-ian-plimer Follow my backup account: @wide_awake_news Subscribe to me on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to my newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Human emissions of carbon dioxide have never been proven to cause global warming. It would also need to be shown that the natural emissions, which make up 97% of total emissions, do not drive global warming. This is a scientific fraud. Chemistry has shown for 200 years that carbon dioxide has an inverse solubility, meaning it warms up when it is not dissolved. Ice core samples also demonstrate that carbon dioxide increases after natural warming, indicating that temperature drives carbon dioxide levels, not the other way around. This is another fraudulent claim.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't have opinions. I have demonstrable facts. These facts are validated, and these facts are repeatable. Fact number 1, no one has ever shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. Never been shown.
And if it could be shown, Then you would have to show that the 97% of emissions, which are natural, do not drive global warming. Game over. We are dealing with a fraud. It's a scientific fraud from day 1. We hear the propaganda that increases of the gas of life, a trace gas in the atmosphere, We'll bring a disaster, and that we will have runaway global warming.
Sorry, folks. We've known for 200 years from chemistry That it's the exact inverse. Now, I'm sure some of you tried this last night at the dinner with a champagne Or a beer and you forgot to drink it and it warmed up and it kept bubbling and bubbling and bubbling and bubbling. And that is the inverse solubility of carbon dioxide. We've known that for 200 years.
We see it from the ice cores. When we drill into ice, We have chemical fingerprints that tell us what the temperature was, and we have little bits of trapped air. And we can show that when we had natural warming Some 650 to 6000 years later, we had an increase in carbon dioxide. It's not carbon dioxide drives temperature. It's zigzag inverse.
Another fraud.
Professor Ian Plimer - CPAC Sessions - ADH TV
Watch distinguished Professor Ian Plimer’s presentation at CPAC Australia. Brought to you by ADH TV.
watch.adh.tv
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Rising temperatures cause increased atmospheric CO2, not the other way around. Solar activity regulates Earth's temperature. Climate change predates human existence and will persist. Globalist bodies like the UN and WEF exploit this to gain control. Watch "The Great Global Warming Swindle" for more. Visit httpswideawakemediacom for similar content. ClimateScam NetZero.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
MUST-WATCH: Contrary to propaganda spouted by climate alarmists, rising temperatures are the CAUSE of increased atmospheric CO2, not the other way around, and the temperature of the Earth is regulated by solar activity. The climate has always changed, long before humans got here, and it will continue to change long after we're gone, but globalist bodies like the UN and WEF want us to believe that humans are causing it, as a pretext to exert absolute totalitarian control over the entire planet. From the documentary, ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle’. Watch the full documentary here: https://wide-awake-media.com/great-global-warming-swindle For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
The ice core surveys in Vostok, Antarctica, show a correlation between carbon dioxide (CO2) and temperature, but the relationship is more complex than Al Gore suggests. The ice core data reveals that temperature increases precede rises in CO2 levels by about 800 years. This indicates that temperature changes lead to CO2 increases, not the other way around. Furthermore, humans are not the main source of CO2 emissions; volcanoes, animals, bacteria, and the oceans contribute significantly more. The oceans, in particular, have a memory of temperature changes and release or absorb CO2 accordingly. Earth's long climate history does not support the idea that CO2 determines global temperatures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The 1st ice cold survey took place in Vostok in the Antarctic. What it found, as Al Gore correctly points out, was a clear correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature.
Speaker 1: We're going back in time now 650,000 years. Here's what the temperature Has been on our earth. Now one thing that kinda jumps out at you is Do do they ever fit together? Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. The relationship is actually very complicated But there is one relationship that is far more powerful than all the others and it is this.
When there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets Warmer.
Speaker 0: Al Gore says the relationship between temperature and c o two is complicated. But he doesn't say what those complications are. In fact there was something very important in the ice core data that he failed to mention. Professor Ian Clark is a leading arctic paleoclimatologist who looks back into the earth's temperature record tens of millions of years.
Speaker 2: When we look at, climate on long scales, we're looking for geological material that actually records climate. If we're to take an ice sample, For example, we use isotopes to reconstruct temperature, but
Speaker 3: the atmosphere that's imprisoned in that ice, we liberate and then we look at the C02 content.
Speaker 0: Professor Clark and others have indeed discovered as Al Gore says, a link between carbon dioxide and temperature. But what Al Gore doesn't say, is that the link is the wrong way around.
Speaker 2: So here, we're looking at the ice core record from Vostok. And in
Speaker 3: the red, we see temperature going up from early time to later time at a very key interval when we came out of a glaciation. And we see the temperature going up. And then we see the CO2 coming up. CO2 lags behind that increase. It's got an 800 year lag.
So temperature is leading CO2 by 800 years.
Speaker 0: There have now been several major ice core surveys. Every one of them shows the same thing. The temperature rises or falls and then after a few 100 years, carbon dioxide follows.
Speaker 3: So obviously, carbon dioxide is not the cause of that warming. In fact, we can say that the warming produced the increase in carbon dioxide. C o two clearly cannot be causing temperature changes. It's The product of temperature, it's following temperature changes.
Speaker 4: The ice core record goes to the very heart of the problem we have here, they said if the CO 2 increases in the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas, then the temperature will go up. But the ice core record shows exactly the opposite. So the fundamental assumption, the most fundamental assumption of the whole theory of of climate change true to humans is is shown to be wrong.
Speaker 0: But how can it be that higher temperatures lead to more CO2 in the atmosphere? To understand this, we must first restate the obvious point that carbon dioxide is a natural gas produced by all living things. Few things annoy me more than to hear people talking about carbon dioxide as being a pollutant. You're made of carbon dioxide. I'm made of carbon dioxide.
Carbon dioxide is how living things grow. What's more, humans are not the main source of carbon dioxide.
Speaker 1: Humans produce a, small fraction in the single digits Percentage wise of the c o two that is produced in the atmosphere.
Speaker 0: Volcanoes produce more c o two each year than all the factories and cars and planes and other sources of man made carbon dioxide put together. More still comes from animals and bacteria which produced about a 150 gigatons of c o two each year compared to a mere 6 and a half gigatons from humans. An even larger source of c o two is dying vegetation from falling leaves, for example, in the autumn. But the biggest source of c o two by far is the oceans. Karl Wunsch is professor of oceanography at MIT.
He was also visiting professor in oceanography at Harvard University and University College London and a senior visiting fellow in mathematics and physics at the University of Cambridge. He is the author of 4 major textbooks on oceanography.
Speaker 2: The ocean is the major reservoir into which carbon dioxide goes when it comes out of the atmosphere Or to from which it is reemitted to the the atmosphere. If you heat the surface of the ocean, it tends to emit Carbon dioxide. So similarly, if you cool the ocean surface, the ocean can dissolve more Carbon dioxide.
Speaker 0: So the warmer the oceans, the more carbon dioxide they produce and the cooler they are, the more they suck in. But why is there a time lag of 100 of years between a change in temperature and a change in the amount of carbon dioxide going into or out of the sea? The reason is that oceans are so big and so deep, they take literally hundreds of years to warm up and cool down. This time lag means the oceans have what scientists call a memory of temperature changes.
Speaker 2: The ocean has a memory of past events, running out as far as 10000 years. So for example, if somebody says, oh, I'm seeing changes in the North Atlantic, this must mean that the climate system is changing. It may only mean that something happened in a remote part of the ocean decades or 100 of years ago whose effects are now beginning to show up in the North Atlantic.
Speaker 0: The current warming began long before people had cars or electric lights. In the past 150 years, the temperature has risen just is over half a degree Celsius. But most of that rise occurred before 1940. Since that time, the temperature has fallen for 4 decades and risen for 3. There is no evidence at all from Earth's long climate history that carbon dioxide has ever determined global temperatures.