TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

There was no pandemic; data shows all-cause mortality did not rise before the WHO's declaration. The real public health emergency stemmed from government actions. Inappropriate PCR tests misled people into thinking they had a specific disease, while harmful medical procedures led to unnecessary deaths in hospitals and care homes. Many were denied life-saving antibiotics, resulting in bacterial pneumonia deaths. The claim of a pandemic justified rushed vaccine development, which is impossible within the stated timeframe. Manufacturing complex biological products typically takes years, and what was administered was likely a toxic substance. This narrative allowed for mass vaccinations, with millions reportedly dying as a result.

I have a PhD in virology and immunology. After testing 1500 samples, we found no COVID, only influenza A and B. Other labs confirmed our findings. CDC couldn't provide viable COVID samples. We believe COVID is fictitious, and the 225,000 deaths were due to comorbidities. We are suing the CDC for COVID fraud. The genomic extracts of COVID were not successfully isolated. COVID is just another flu strain, not a real virus.

there wasn't a pandemic, there wasn't a public health emergency, there was nothing unusual happening. they called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic, because they were lying to you. there is nowhere in the world you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory deaths anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic. by using misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says, PCR. there's literally what we had is a pandemic of rollout of the test. it's not a mistake. they they knew it was rubbish. they designed it to produce positives where there was no illness. and then when people died, they said, oh, they had COVID. they called the pandemic, and then the data started arriving, which was fraudulent. if you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence. for these pandemics, they just lied to you.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, explains that the test was not designed to detect viruses. The PCR test can find almost anything in anyone if done properly, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's meaningful. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to false positives, labeling asymptomatic individuals as infected. Mullis discovered that there was no proof of HIV causing AIDS when he was hired to measure HIV levels using PCR. He realized that no one had evidence to support the claim. Mullis also exposed how the CDC and high-level officials profited from the HIV/AIDS connection. Despite his willingness to challenge them, few people were interested in exposing the truth. Mullis passed away in 2019, just before the emergence of COVID-19.

The PCR test, commonly used for COVID-19, involves a nasal swab. According to Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize-winning scientist who created the test, it can detect almost anything if amplified enough. However, Mullis himself stated that the PCR test should not be used to diagnose diseases, as it only detects fragments of illness. Many laboratories worldwide run the test at high amplification levels, leading to a high rate of false positives. Even Anthony Fauci acknowledged that results beyond 33 cycles are likely not infectious material. The New York Times reported that 90% of PCR tests were not indicative of active illness. Lowering the amplification cycles resulted in significant reductions in case numbers. In the past, PCR tests have caused false positives, such as in a whooping cough pseudoepidemic. Some criticize Fauci for misleading the public.

The test for COVID-19 cannot differentiate between live and dead matter, only detecting fragments of viruses, leading to guaranteed false positives. This was used to create cases for a public health emergency, enabling the use of untested vaccines. There are claims that true isolates of viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, do not exist; the viral genomes are only computer-generated. Historical evidence from the 1918 influenza pandemic shows no proof of transmission, as attempts to infect volunteers failed. Current symptoms attributed to COVID-19 may arise from various factors, including environmental toxins and EMF exposure, rather than a specific virus. The idea of a virus causing disease is questioned, and the evidence for SARS-CoV-2 remains unproven.

The speaker references a developing controversy surrounding Anthony Fauci, stating that there is “talk of Anthony Fauci being prosecuted as that may have been a auto pen pardon.” They note that “Trump just said they might revoke those pardons.” The speaker asserts that this issue should be on the front page news of every major news organization, arguing that, for the past four years, people experienced lockdowns whose consequences included shattered lives and lost jobs and livelihoods. They contend these losses occurred “based on now a verifiably highly flawed test,” emphasizing that “only fourteen percent represented true infection.” In light of these assertions, the speaker calls for accountability, insisting that there must be discussion about preventing a recurrence: “There should be accountability,” and “we have to start talking about this because this cannot happen again.” The overall message ties the alleged prosecutorial and pardon-revocation developments to broader social and economic harms believed to have stemmed from the lockdowns and the testing that supported them, urging media coverage and a public conversation about responsibility and safeguards moving forward.

The speaker claims Pfizer committed the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history due to the scale and foreknowledge of harm. She states Pfizer knew within a month of the vaccine rollout in November 2020 that it didn't work to stop COVID, referring to internal language describing "vaccine failure" and "failure of efficacy." She claims the 3rd most common side effect in the documents is COVID. According to the speaker, mandates, job losses, family separations, deaths, injuries, and sterilizations were based on a lie. The speaker asserts that society was destroyed, children's education was ruined, depression and suicide levels increased, and businesses were destroyed, all based on a lie, resulting in a massive transfer of wealth.

Speaker 0 argues that the test cannot distinguish live from dead matter, only analyzes fragments and is set up to guarantee false positives, which the speaker claims was used to create case numbers for declaring a public health emergency of international concern and to enable untested drugs or vaccines to be used on people. Speaker 1 adds that the biggest lie may be that true viral isolates are unavailable, noting that the claimed genome of SARS-CoV-2 exists only in silico as a computer-programmed genome. The speaker says fear is created to control people, describing “fake mythical flying unicorns” that make us sick and asserting that disease is constructed rather than evidenced by visible agents. They claim that there is no evidence of transmission or isolations supporting the idea of a pathogen causing disease in the usual sense. The speaker references Andrew Kaufman, Doctor Cowan, Stephen Lunk, and others to support the claim that, after a year of pandemic conditions, there is no virus proven through traditional means, including in the 1918 influenza pandemic. They state that volunteers were exposed to sputum from infected individuals, or to the sputum directly, without becoming ill; some experiments involved injecting processed material, which also did not cause illness. They note that horses did not consistently transmit illness when exposed to similar materials, and conclude that influenza does not originate from a Latin term for a virus but means “influence,” suggesting historical transmission evidence is weak. The speakers discuss that we do not have approved evidence of transmission, a virus, a test, or autopsies; what exists is a syndrome of symptoms—flu-like symptoms without pathognomonic signs. They propose several alternative causes for COVID-19–like illness, including transmissibility that appears real but isn’t, radiation effects, and other non-disease explanations. Speaker 1 references Dr. Cowan’s book Contagion to illustrate how radiation exposure in mines could mimic disease transmission, where illness is not truly infectious. They argue that non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) and exposure to graphene oxide toxicity (claimed to be present in vaccines and referred to as viral-based genetic therapies by the FDA) could produce COVID-like symptoms. They also acknowledge an artificially created spike protein in a lab as a known factor. However, they reiterate that there is no evidence for the mythical SARS-CoV-2 virus as a causative agent. In summary, the dialogue challenges the existence of proven SARS-CoV-2 isolates, questions the validity of tests and transmission evidence, and proposes alternative explanations for the illness, including EMF toxicity, graphene oxide toxicity, and lab-made spike proteins, while highlighting a lack of definitive proof for traditional viral causation.

The speaker claims that in Pfizer's initial vaccine trial with 20,000 vaccinated and 20,000 unvaccinated participants, the vaccinated group had 23% more deaths from all causes than the placebo group after six months. The speaker states that the claim of 100% vaccine efficacy was based on the fact that two people in the placebo group died from COVID versus one person in the vaccine group. The speaker asserts that people believed the vaccine would prevent them from getting COVID, which they now realize is false.

COVID-19 vaccinations protect children from severe illness and reduce community spread, which goes against the science. Only 15 children between 0-19 years old died during the pandemic. Increased death tolls and adverse events arose after the COVID shots were rolled out. Before that, there was no pandemic, and children who died had serious comorbidities. Positive PCR tests were fraudulent due to high cycle thresholds between 40-45, leading to many false positives, making the test useless. The test's creator stated before his 2019 death that it was not designed to diagnose viral illnesses.

The speaker discusses talk of Anthony Fauci being prosecuted, mention of an auto pen pardon, and Trump’s statement that those pardons might be revoked. The speaker asserts that this should be on the front page news of every major news organization. They reference the past four years and the lockdowns, stating that people’s lives were shattered, they lost their jobs, and they lost their livelihoods. This is linked to a claim that the foundation for these outcomes was a verifiably highly flawed test in which only fourteen percent represented true infection. The speaker calls for accountability and emphasizes that this cannot happen again, insisting that the issue must be discussed publicly.

There was no pandemic, as all-cause mortality data did not increase, and the WHO fraudulently declared one. An inappropriate PCR test was used, giving the false impression of a novel disease. People were mistreated via mass ventilation, sedatives and respiratory depressants in care homes, and denial of antibiotics, leading to deaths from bacterial pneumonia. Since there was no pandemic, experimental medical interventions were unnecessary. It is impossible to rapidly invent, test, and manufacture a complex biomedical product; the fastest record was six years. What was done was the advancement of intentionally toxic materials, rushed and injected into people, resulting in millions of deaths. The lie of a pandemic was maintained to inject billions with an intentionally dangerous substance, resulting in 17 million deaths so far.

Speaker 0: They use them for to amplify fear, to boost compliance, and, of course, push those vaccines. Well, joining me now is primary care physician and author of unavoidably unsafe childhood Reconsidered. Doctor Jeff Barky is with us. Doc, it's great to have you back on. Speaker 1: Hey, Grant. Thanks for having me. Great to be with you. Speaker 0: Alright. I know this comes as no surprise, this number, that only fourteen percent of the PCR positive turned out to be COVID in Germany. I would imagine it translates to The United States. But your reaction and now seeing this done by real scientists, real doctors in a real journal of medicine. Speaker 1: Well, there's no surprise by this study. We knew it all along. The PCR test was never designed to detect infection. What it detects is miniscule particles of the RNA virus, and then they would crank up the cycle threshold. They would amplify the test to create positivity. And so the problem is that you could test the side of a table and get a positive result, let alone that we were actually going to treat based on a test result. I was always taught in medical school, we don't treat test results, we treat patients. And that's what I tried to do. And then the government went out of its way to suppress effective repurposed medication, like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. This was a money game. This was a scam. This was all based on fear. No surprise out of Germany. Speaker 0: You know, I I believe it. And let's not forget because we always talk about the money and the vaccines and big pharma and their ties to government, and I know that was a lot. But let's not forget too. This was weaponized to keep people home so they wouldn't vote for president Trump during during that twenty twenty election. It was all part of the big steal. Speaker 1: These positives, they wanted lots of positives. They didn't want negatives. They wanted positives. Didn't they, doc? Speaker 0: They absolutely did for a variety of reasons. The more you can keep people in fear, the more likely it is they're gonna follow your directive. We've never seen anything like this before. The government imposing its will upon free citizens. They closed churches. They closed mom and pop stores. They forced healthy people to stay indoors, and they closed down hospitals and told sick people to stay away. I've never seen anything like that happen before. The sad part here, Grant, is I'm not clear that the American people learned their lesson. And when the government comes around and does this again, I just hope enough of us will stand up this time and say, hell no. Well

The PCR test, used to determine COVID-19 cases, amplifies RNA fragments to detect the virus. However, the high amplification can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to avoid false positives. When labs reduced the cycles, case numbers significantly decreased. False positives can occur almost half the time, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. In the past, PCR tests have caused false epidemics. The test requires skilled technicians and careful handling, but it is currently being conducted on a large scale with hastily trained personnel. Therefore, it is important to question the accuracy of reported case numbers.

This pandemic is a complete fake. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the ethics committee, a pandemic is defined by the number of excess deaths and severe cases of an unknown or known disease. However, reports from Professor Toubiana and Professor Yoanniedis show that there were no excess deaths in France in 2020 compared to previous years. They argue that the PCR test, which replaced doctors, is a fraudulent tool that cannot diagnose anything. They claim that the PCR test is being used to justify lockdowns, economic shutdowns, and vaccinations. They also argue that the flu and other diseases have disappeared. They encourage people to question and challenge these fraudulent practices.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, explained that the test can find almost anything in anyone if done well. However, using it to claim meaning or diagnose a virus is a misuse. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to false positives, labeling asymptomatic individuals as infected. 30 years ago, Dr. Anthony Fauci pushed for higher doses of the drug AZT for AIDS patients, despite lacking evidence. Mullis discovered there was no proof of HIV causing AIDS. He questioned the CDC's profit motives and the involvement of high-level officials. Mullis wanted to expose Fauci and Gallo but faced little attention. He passed away in 2019, just before the emergence of COVID-19, leaving many questioning the timing.

The speaker discusses the issue of cycle thresholds in PCR testing. They explain that the original protocol used a cycle threshold of 45, which amplifies the results by 10. This means that even unlikely findings, such as particles from Mars, could be detected. The speaker suggests that by using a high cycle threshold, it is possible to create a pandemic by testing healthy individuals and spreading the myth of asymptomatic spread. This is how cases are created, according to the speaker.

The speaker notes increased talk of prosecuting Anthony Fauci, suggesting it could involve an auto pen pardon, and asserts that Trump said those pardons might be revoked. They argue this should be front-page news everywhere, referencing the past four years of lockdowns in which people lost their jobs and livelihoods. They claim these outcomes were based on a verifiably highly flawed test, which they state represented only fourteen percent true infection. The speaker calls for accountability and says we must start talking about this because it cannot happen again.

There was no pandemic. The all-cause mortality data did not increase before the WHO's fraudulent declaration. The PCR test was inappropriately used, creating a false impression of a specific disease. People were mistreated via mass ventilation, sedatives and respiratory depressants in care homes, and denial of antibiotics. Based on this lie, we were told vaccines would save us, but there was no pandemic, so no rushed intervention was needed. It's impossible to invent, test, and manufacture a complex biomedical product so quickly. What was done was the advancement of intentionally toxic materials, sketchily advanced and injected into people, with millions dead as a result. The lie of a pandemic was maintained to inject five and a half billion people with a dangerous substance, resulting in seventeen million deaths so far.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss criticisms of the COVID-19 response, focusing on diagnostic testing, treatment, and government actions. Speaker 0 notes that only fourteen percent of PCR-positive cases turned out to be COVID in Germany, and suggests this is a global pattern, including the United States. Speaker 1 responds that there is no surprise, stating that the PCR test was never designed to detect infection. He explains that it detects miniscule particles of the RNA virus and that cycle threshold was cranked up to create positivity. He emphasizes that tests should not dictate treatment and that, in his view, doctors treat patients, not test results. He accuses the government of suppressing effective repurposed medications such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, calling the approach a money-driven scam based on fear, and asserts this was no surprise from Germany. Speaker 0 adds that, beyond money and vaccines, the response was weaponized to keep people at home to influence political outcomes, suggesting it was part of efforts related to the 2020 election. He claims the positives were valued over negatives and asserts that the goal was to keep people in fear to ensure compliance with directives. Speaker 1 agrees, arguing that fear increases compliance with directives. He says he has never seen anything like the government imposing its will on free citizens, including closing churches and mom-and-pop stores, forcing healthy people to stay indoors, closing hospitals, and telling sick people to stay away. He expresses concern about whether the American people learned their lesson and hopes that, if the government acts similarly again, enough people will stand up and say, “hell no.”

The speaker discusses the PCR test used by the medical system to diagnose illness, asserting that technicians “crank up that machine” to confirm illness and then “crank it down” to show the opposite, implying the test is manipulated. They claim the PCR test is used to sell treatments and to poison people for illnesses they do not have, referencing Lyme disease as an example. The discussion broadens to the pandemic, noting that the Tanzanian president observed a link between a pawpaw fruit and COVID and that this connection was explored further. The speaker then reports that they looked up what the inventor of the PCR technology has said, stating that the inventor insisted time and time again that PCR tests “do not prove causation and cannot diagnose illnesses.” They acknowledge potential pushback but maintain that “the system lies to you to poison you and make money off you,” suggesting that PCR tests are used for multiple deceptive purposes. According to the speaker, these tests are also used to fake pandemics, convict people who aren’t guilty, and put people in jail. They claim PCR testing is used to say things about individuals or to enable GMO practices so small farmers can be sued. The speaker further asserts that gene testing, paternity testing, and culling animals are controlled by these mechanisms to influence the food supply. The overarching claim is that whenever someone suggests you might have an illness, you should question the professional and their motives, and consider why they might be “dancing.” To support these ideas, the speaker directs listeners to read Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullens, implying that the book explains the lies being described in the discussion. A number of provocative connections are presented as part of the argument: the manipulation of PCR tests, the exploitation of diagnostic claims for financial gain, the alleged use of tests to influence legal and agricultural outcomes, and the suggestion that public messaging around illness is part of a broader scheme. The reference to the Tanzanian president’s observation about pawpaw fruit and COVID is used to illustrate how seemingly unrelated elements were brought into consideration in evaluating the pandemic. In closing, the speaker reiterates that the inventor of PCR has stated that PCR cannot prove causation or diagnose illness, and they urge listeners to scrutinize the claims of professionals who discuss illnesses, the pandemic, and related technologies, while endorsing the book Murder by Injection as a deeper explanation of the purported lies.

The PCR test, used to detect the presence of the SARS CoV-2 virus, has come under scrutiny for its reliability and potential for false positives. The test amplifies RNA fragments to identify the virus, but it can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Testing at high cycle thresholds can result in false positives, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to reduce false positives. Lowering the cycle thresholds has led to significant reductions in reported cases. The misuse and misinterpretation of the PCR test has contributed to inflated case numbers and unnecessary panic.

Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, explains how the test can find almost anything if amplified enough. The PCR test for COVID-19 has been misused to create false positives. Mullis discovered there was no proof linking HIV to AIDS, exposing a sham in the medical industry. He criticized CDC's profit motives and called out Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo. Mullis wanted to expose the truth on TV but faced little support. Despite his efforts, his voice was not widely heard before his passing at age 74.

The speaker emphasizes the PCR test as the foundation of the current situation, stating that without it, there would be no cases or public health emergency. They question the necessity of measures taken, pointing out the absence of excess mortality before the vaccination campaign. The speaker suggests focusing efforts on addressing the PCR test as the key issue.