reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The USMCA is a good deal, but the speaker had a bad relationship with a person who worked for Trudeau's predecessor because they disagreed on the deal. The speaker claims to have called Trudeau "governor Trudeau," which may have hurt his election. The speaker questioned Trudeau about why the US was taking Canada's cars and suggested a 25% tariff on Canadian cars, to which Trudeau allegedly responded that it would mean the end of Canada. The speaker finds it hard to justify subsidizing Canada, potentially to the tune of $200 billion a year, while the US protects Canada militarily. The speaker believes it's hard for the American taxpayer to be happy about subsidizing Canada.

We must acknowledge President Trump's repeated desire for Canada to become the 51st state. None of us want to be caught unprepared, failing to defend Canada or collaborate with our democratic allies to safeguard our borders. They are willing to cooperate with us. It is imperative that we take immediate action domestically, connect with them, and establish a new global order that protects democracy and Canadian sovereignty.

Canada is described as sweeping the fentanyl issue under the rug by sources in the show, despite public moves like appointing a fentanyl czar and increasing northern border patrols after pressure from Trump and Kash Patel. The guest says Canadian law enforcement acknowledge the issue but feel resources are insufficient to crack down on transnational crime, with a sense that “the root of the problem” is not being addressed. The guest reports that the planning and production of fentanyl have shifted to Canada, with cartel operatives setting up labs there. They describe how cartels, after crackdowns on the southern border, moved operations into Canada where a visa is not needed for a tourist entry, allowing quick setup and networking with preexisting Canadian gangs such as the Hells Angels, Brother’s Keepers, Red Scorpion, and United Nations gang. Precursors come through the Port of Vancouver, where less than 1% of cargo is inspected, enabling easy importation of chemicals. The guest asserts that the majority of fentanyl production now occurs in Canada, with a claim of 99% certainty, and cites an operative for the Sinaloa Cartel in Canada showing labs on West Coast resources. Labs are described as often in suburban areas on farmland or small residences, not just in large urban centers. The production is said to have started in 2016-2017 as cartel operations moved into Canada, with ongoing Canadian law enforcement aware since then but under-resourced to counter transnational crime groups. The RCMP head reportedly estimated thousands of organized crime groups, but CSA’s Canadian intelligence suggests 668, highlighting a disconnect between agencies. The main cartel presence in Canada is labeled as Sinaloa and CJNG, with CJNG now possibly dominant due to Sinaloa’s weakening position and alliance with New Generation Cartel. The Canadian fentanyl flow includes enforcers recruited from Canada, including Quebec and Ontario, who manage payments, protection, and border activities to facilitate drug movement and violence. Recruitment extends globally to the Balkans, Armenia, Australia, England, and other Commonwealth countries to leverage foreign nationals who can blend in and avoid detection. Group chats reveal Canadian area codes and explicit hits-for-hire offers, with examples of payments (e.g., 55,000 Canadian dollars for a hit) and weapon procurement requirements. The border dynamics are described as significant: the northern border remains underprotected, allowing cross-border trafficking. The guest mentions that, even with a U.S. military or law enforcement option, the cartel leadership central to the operation would resist intensely if confronted on Mexican soil, implying that a direct US-backed intervention could be costly and dangerous for the cartel. A notable case described is a “BC Superlab,” a large, sophisticated operation producing meth and fentanyl, recovered in rural BC and Surrey, BC. Authorities found 400 kilograms of meth, 54 kilograms of fentanyl, plus MDMA and cocaine, plus 46 handguns, 21 AR-15 style rifles, 14 submachine guns, two .50 cal rifles, explosives, body armor, and nearly $1 million in cash. The lab’s equipment included jacketed reactors and other specialized items, with large quantities of precursors (5,000 liters of liquid precursor and 10 tons of powder) and evidence they may have been producing P2P, a key meth precursor. The RCMP described the operation as extremely sophisticated, with a network of metal ducting to vent fumes and a setup suggesting an international cross-border network with potential ties to Mexican cartel operations and other global criminal networks. Health Canada is testing unusual equipment to see if it signals new production methods. Investigators emphasize that the drugs were destined for abroad and that Vancouver’s infrastructure could facilitate expansion into Asia-Pacific markets, including China, Japan, India, Indonesia, Australia, and New Zealand. Despite the scale of the operation, only one person had been arrested at the time of reporting, underscoring the magnitude of the challenge and the global reach of the drug networks. Overall, the conversation frames Canada as a critical, expanding node in an international fentanyl production and distribution network, with entrenched organizational complexity, cross-border logistics, and multilingual, multinational recruitment that complicates enforcement.

Canadians are preparing for war with the U.S., a fact many Americans remain unaware of. I recently spoke with well-connected individuals in D.C. who were shocked to hear this. Prime Minister Trudeau's recent comments, caught on a hot mic, confirmed the seriousness of the situation. The threat is real; jokes about a U.S. invasion are not funny. Canadians are actively boycotting the U.S. and seeking alternative business partners. British Columbia, a province larger than most U.S. states, is canceling U.S. government contracts. Other provinces are following suit. My video on this topic has 80,000 views, yet I've received no American comments. The lack of awareness in the U.S. is deeply concerning; Americans need to understand the imminent threat of war.

Rampant illegal immigration and the illicit drug trade, particularly fentanyl, are costing the American people more than a potential trade war. President Trump aims to ensure that China, Mexico, and Canada prioritize U.S. national security as much as they do their own. Fentanyl's precursor materials come from China, are assembled in Mexico, and are the leading cause of death for Americans aged 18 to 45. Trump has committed to using every available tool to secure the nation, and addressing this crisis is part of that effort.

Donald Trump's tariffs could severely impact Canada's economy, potentially leading to a significant rise in unemployment. With 60% of Canada's international trade linked to the U.S., these tariffs threaten to price Canadian goods out of the American market. The increase in apprehensions of individuals on terrorist watch lists at the Canada-U.S. border has prompted these tariffs, highlighting concerns over Canada's immigration policies. The current government is seen as ineffective, with ongoing issues like open borders contributing to the crisis. Despite calls for economic negotiation, Canada lacks the strength to effectively respond. The situation is precarious, and the future looks uncertain as the government struggles to maintain power amidst these challenges.

Canada is losing thousands of young people to illicit fentanyl poisoning, which has become a mass murder weapon for Chinese communists and Mexican cartels. The biggest fentanyl lab in history was found in Vancouver, with ties to Chinese organized crime and biker gangs that have been hired to assassinate people in the United States. Canada needs to update its legal structures, as current laws hinder undercover police operations and contribute to low seizure statistics. Most of the drugs are going from Mexico to Canada and then being brought south into the Northwest United States on ships, but there is almost no port enforcement. The US needs Canada to update their legal structures and create a RICO act like in the United States and designate cartels as terrorists. We have to break the bank on fentanyl trafficking for these cartels and bring them down and take them out.

Canada has been charging the United States tariffs for years, including a 270% tariff on milk, 245% on cheese, and nearly 300% on butter. There are also tariffs on chicken, sausages, barley seed, meat, cars, HVAC, vacuums, cable boxes, TVs, steel, aluminum, and copper. Now that the United States wants to impose tariffs, suddenly we're the bad guys. The United States is tired of one-sided relationships where Canada benefits without offering fair trade in return. Canada is draining billions from the United States. Before criticizing President Trump, Canada should consider how much they've taken from the United States. Without America, Canada's economy would plummet.

New details have emerged about the dinner between Trump and Trudeau. During the conversation, Trudeau warned Trump that new tariffs would harm the Canadian economy. In response, Trump joked that if Canada couldn't thrive without taking $100 billion from the U.S. annually, perhaps Canada should become the 51st state, with Trudeau as its governor. Further discussion will follow with the panel.

Speaker 2 stated he doesn't think they can change Donald Trump at this stage. Speaker 1 believes Pierre Poilievre, like Trump, will focus on the American worker, securing borders, ending fentanyl, and securing the world. Speaker 2 said he and Poilievre have a lot in common, but Speaker 1 says Poilievre is willfully blind to threats facing the country. Speaker 2 stated the U.S. doesn't want cars, steel, or aluminum from Canada because they want to make their own. Speaker 1 questioned how much steel is used these days. Speaker 2 recounted a conversation with Trudeau, whom he called "Governor Trudeau," about tariffs on Canadian cars. Speaker 2 claimed Trudeau said a 25% tariff would mean the end of Canada. Speaker 2 believes the U.S. subsidizes Canada to the tune of maybe $200 billion a year and that it's hard to justify. He added that the U.S. protects Canada militarily.

You are imposing tariffs on regular Americans, and we will respond. Canada is a crucial market for U.S. exporters, larger than China, Japan, the UK, and France combined. The anger in Canada is palpable, with the entire country rallying behind Prime Minister Trudeau. The tariffs are higher than those against China, which feels like a betrayal to a loyal ally. The justification regarding fentanyl and border security is flimsy, as only a tiny fraction of fentanyl comes from Canada. Canadians are proud of their sovereignty and will retaliate against these unjustified measures. The relationship between our countries has historically been beneficial, and we want to maintain that partnership. The current situation is seen as self-harm for America, and Canadians are uniting in support of their government.

I am not campaigning to be the governor of the fifty-first state. Initially, Canadians were sad because we consider Americans our friends and neighbors, but that sadness evolved into anger. The President of the United States is repeatedly suggesting using economic coercion to force Canada to become the fifty-first state. I take this seriously, and so do Canadians. I'm actively campaigning, and recently, a four-year-old girl named Ari approached me with her mother in Saskatoon. She asked me, with all the seriousness a child could muster, if I could stop Trump from invading Canada. We're now at a point where young children are worried about the possibility of an invasion.

Check out these insane tariffs that Canada imposed on the US last year: 250% for milk, 291% for butter, and over 200% for whey and cheese. Meanwhile, we charged them far less for the same goods. Since Trump announced tariffs, everyone suddenly became an economics expert. I don't know how tariffs will affect the economy, and neither does anyone else. But I do know tariffs led Apple to build a new factory and hire 20,000 Americans. Honda is building Civics here instead of Mexico. Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion to build five chip factories in the US. Tariffs pressure China, Mexico, and Canada to stop the flow of fentanyl. Tariffs are one tactic in an economic strategy. Are we willing to tolerate short-term disruption for long-term gain? Macroeconomics are complicated and take time to play out. Are you listening to people who want the President to fail, even if it hurts America?

Tomorrow, February 1st, President Trump will implement tariffs in response to the illegal fentanyl crisis. A 25% tariff will be imposed on Mexico and Canada, and a 10% tariff on China. These measures are aimed at addressing the distribution of fentanyl, which has resulted in the deaths of millions of Americans. This action reflects the president's commitment to his promises.

Catherine questions the economic impact of the situation, noting that if tariffs were implemented, they would hurt American consumers. Scott dismisses this, suggesting that everything is fine and that Trump is effectively managing the situation. He argues that other countries need to assist the U.S. more, especially regarding border issues. Catherine counters that these countries are already doing what they’ve been doing. Scott insists that families affected by fentanyl should recognize the lack of support. The conversation highlights differing views on the effectiveness of current policies and the perceived need for further action from allies.

Tariffs have become a hot topic, raising questions about their implications for the US, Canada, and Mexico. The current situation highlights the leverage the US holds in negotiations. Mexican exports to the US account for 35% of their GDP, while Canadian exports make up 22%. In contrast, US exports to Mexico and Canada are only 1.2% and 1.5% of their GDP, respectively. This disparity suggests that Mexico and Canada cannot afford to prolong a trade standoff. The US is pushing for negotiations, not out of bullying, but in response to serious issues like the fentanyl crisis and illegal immigration, which have significant impacts on American society. The message is clear: those contributing to these problems must face consequences.

Only 43 pounds of fentanyl were found last year, which is less than a carry-on suitcase. The vast majority of fentanyl is brought in through Mexico, not Canada. Last year alone, there was a 2000% increase in illegal fentanyl. You're asking me for the president's justification for these tariffs. It's disrespectful to the families who have lost loved ones to this deadly poison. They are grateful that they finally have a president who is standing up to both Canada and Mexico, and most importantly, to China as well. The president added an additional 10% tariff on China because this deadly poison is being produced there and distributed through our neighbors. There need to be consequences.

If the US forces our hand, we will inflict the biggest trade blow they have ever endured with dollar-for-dollar retaliation. Any tariff imposed on Canada will be met with a smart and targeted response. The US tariffs are across the board and will hurt them. For example, aluminum is basically electricity in solid form, and imposing a 25% tariff on Canadian aluminum is like putting a 25% tax on electricity, which they need for the AI race with China. Our retaliation will be surgical, targeting American stakeholders who matter to the White House. I propose a 100% tariff on all Teslas and call on other affected countries to join us. We will also target specific Trump constituencies, like Wisconsin dairy farmers, by no longer allowing them to sell their products in Canada.

Tariffs are being imposed without justification, as only about 0.2% of fentanyl entering the U.S. comes from Canada. If border security were truly the concern, it could be easily addressed. Canada is also affected by the smuggling of U.S. guns that lead to violence in Canadian cities, and both countries could collaborate to manage asylum seekers. The recent threat to Canadian sovereignty, suggesting Canada could become the 51st state to avoid tariffs, has angered Canadians. They value their national pride and sovereignty, and any aggressive actions will be met with a strong response. Canada wants to maintain a friendly partnership with the U.S. while standing firm on its identity.

Speaker: I have a message for the Canadian people. Don't vote for this guy. Real and Mark Carney is the most elite of elitists out there. This guy is not a man of the people at all. He's the ultimate elitist, and be careful because he put out a message, and he conflated, you know, hey, Trump is the biggest threat to we've had, you know, in his lifetime. Thinking about all the things that have threatened humankind in in his lifetime. So it's hyperbolic. But then he started bragging about the economy, you know, the liberal economy. I have all these charts. Mean, it's just and they're all heartbreaking if you're a Canadian. The standard of living has imploded. You look at the investments, right, or where the jobs are. Almost all of it, public sector, little private sector, and self employment, none. There's no real business opportunities there. OECD predicts the worst economies for 2020 to 2030 at the end of all 36 countries, Canada. I mean, careful. You're right. You've got to right. It's not bad. It's horrific. It's horrific. This country needs a reboot, right? Which means Canada's vulnerable. It's extraordinarily vulnerable. They're to a major power like America taking them on. Sure. They I mean and we're friends. Again, this is reciprocal. This is like, hey. Okay. You wanna protect your dairy farmers and they for whatever reason, they supersede everyone else? Negotiate with the Trump team. But this sort of saber rattling but I will say this. They do have a friend in the American media. And my emails this morning, get one from Fortune, and it says America's war in Canada. We didn't declare war. The article, you can't find that anywhere in the article, but that's where they headline it. Maybe it makes you open an email, but again, this is the kind of stuff that's happening out there. It's really it's really this is a heartfelt message to to Canada and and and people up there. It's time to turn your country around. I don't know. Time to make Canada great again.

Tariffs are taxes on imported goods, and the U.S. only imports 15% of its goods and services. Canada and Mexico contribute just 5% of that. This trade war could significantly impact their economies, as Canada relies on the U.S. for 20% of its GDP, with 75% of its trade tied to the U.S. If prices rise, Americans may stop buying Canadian goods, hurting their economy. Mexico is similarly vulnerable, with 40% of its GDP linked to U.S. exports. Concerns about Canada cutting off power are unfounded, as they are in significant debt. Other countries contribute only 10% to the U.S. GDP, and tariffs can be beneficial when paired with tax cuts. While there may be slight inflation, it will be manageable. America is prioritizing its interests, so there's no need for alarm.

The conversation centers on the idea of a closer economic union between Canada and the U.S. amid concerns about sovereignty. One participant expresses dissatisfaction with the current Canadian government and advocates for direct negotiations with Trump, believing that tariffs are not the solution. They propose ideas like a common currency and no tariffs, emphasizing that Canadians would benefit from access to the U.S. market. The discussion touches on the potential for a new passport system allowing free movement between the two countries, while also addressing concerns about cultural preservation and economic independence. The dialogue concludes with a focus on the importance of communication and exploring opportunities for economic collaboration.

There’s nothing that China, Canada, or Mexico can do tonight to prevent the tariffs from being implemented tomorrow. This is not a negotiating tool; it’s an economic decision due to significant trade deficits. Canada has a nearly $200 billion deficit with the U.S., and it’s unfair for the U.S. to subsidize Canada. Mexico has a $250 billion deficit, and while border crossings have decreased, the past administration allowed many criminals to enter the U.S. Fentanyl, primarily produced in China, is a major issue, with much of it coming through Mexico and Canada. Overall, these countries have not treated the U.S. fairly.