TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We need to let the deep state know that we won't accept Joe Biden being sworn in on January 20th. We should gather more people than the recent Washington protest and make a citizen's arrest if necessary. We should also coordinate individual and small group actions to resist. It's important to be prepared for any violence from Antifa or BLM. The government and FBI may not do the right thing unless we make them. We should rally and take to the streets, like the armed resurrection in Athens, Tennessee in 1946. We need to follow a plan and not fight individually. Guerrilla warfare, like the American Indians, may be necessary.

The transcript follows a chaotic, multi-voiced discussion centered on political information networks, election integrity, and coordinated activism around protests and media narratives. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 repeatedly question the sources of information: “Who the fuck is Jeremy? Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke?” and the same for Jonathan, signaling concern about where information originates and how it is disseminated. - Speaker 2 describes a sense of purpose from sharing information and notes that Wisconsin was the first state where “the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter, Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, under oath in, you know, a senate… the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity.” - Speaker 3 references multiple online presences, including YouTube and Facebook (Jeremy Oliver, Onslaught Media Group), and mentions protesting activities as part of the narrative. - Speaker 4 mentions “Using other state capitals for practice dry runs,” implying rehearsal for protests or political actions. - Speaker 1 indicates a readiness to “storm the capital” and notes that participants are “all actors,” signaling a performative or coordinated element to actions. - Speaker 3, as a journalist or news producer, plans to stream live from protests to show “the real story” and “support the people that are out there fighting for our First Amendment rights.” - A dialogue involving Speaker 1 and Patrick discusses Mary Fanning and Mary Fenix, with questions about speaking to Patrick and perceived fairness in conversations, leading to a strained exchange. - Speaker 5 asserts that “Donald Trump has no business being president,” and introduces a coalition or think tank that includes Biden, Harris, Mike Flynn, and Simon Johnson (an IMF chief economist by birth in England), framing a network with both Democrats and Republicans. - Speaker 3 introduces Brian Gamble as CIO of the America Project, founded by Patrick Byrne, who sits on the Council on Foreign Relations with Stanley McChrystal. The claim is made that Flynn registered Flynn Intel Group from McChrystal’s home; McChrystal is described as an advisor for the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system that detects Trump-trending content and promotes opposing viewpoints. The system is said to share opposing viewpoints, connecting to efforts involving the Flynn network to target the Patriot movement. - Speaker 6 expresses disbelief at the unfolding information, while Speaker 1 dismisses an interruption during a conversation, showing friction in interviews and onlookers. - Speaker 8 details that “the entire Flynn network was there,” naming Ali Alexander (a former CMP member) as a lead organizer, and Michael Flynn’s appearance on the CMP staff roster. The aim is stated as “creating instability as they’re trying to carry out a color revolution.” The speaker lists a list of Flynn network traits: a united and organized opposition, the ability to drive home the claim that voting results are falsified, compliant independent media to inform citizens about the falsified vote, and the mobilization of tens of thousands of demonstrators. - Speakers 9 and 10 discuss 2020 in Maricopa County, noting 395,000 in-person voters on election day (a figure they describe as low due to COVID) and debating how many Republicans intended but did not vote in Maricopa in the midterms. Projections estimate large missed numbers (700,000 or around 150,000 in later drafts), with debate on whether turnout would favor one party given demographics and turnout expectations. - Speaker 8 critiques associated figures: Patrick Byrne, Roger Richards (tattoo of Lucifer, propaganda space films with Jordan Sather), Emily Newman (ties to US Agency for Global Media, linked to Hillary Clinton and John Kerry), and Brian Gamble’s background in information warfare. - There are digressions about fundraising sources, rockefeller connections, and a tension between reform goals and control, with Speaker 12 suggesting figures like Charlie Kirk publicly advocate doing “the same things that got us into this place” to “beat the system,” implying a critique of reform vs. control within the movement. - The dialogue closes with personal anecdotes about Wisconsin politics, a case discussed with a Supreme Court justice race, and a strained, emotional confrontation that underscores distrust and the perception of manipulated information flows.

Government workers discuss the actions and decisions within their control. They emphasize the power of noncooperation and leaking information to journalists and activists. They also mention the importance of creating parallel structures and being in touch with civic and grassroots groups. Slowing down bureaucratic processes through cost-benefit analysis and leaking documents is highlighted as an effective tactic. The conversation touches on the risks and consequences of these actions, including the potential loss of jobs or legal implications.

The speakers discuss their plans to enter the capital and coordinate with other individuals. They mention meeting at specific locations and express their intention to take action. They discuss the use of guns and munitions and mention the need for gas masks. They also mention clearing certain areas and holding the line. The speakers express frustration with the lack of organization and communication. They discuss the presence of law enforcement and their efforts to navigate the building. The speakers mention specific locations within the capital and discuss their strategy for moving forward.

Two speakers discuss going into the capital tomorrow, insisting on a plan despite hesitation. They oscillate between urgency and caution: "Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital" and "I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested." They try to keep the rhetoric "Peaceful" and "Fed" in the mix, then confirm aloud: "We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright." A sharply cut interjection—"Shut the fuck up, Uber"—is followed by: "To the capital." They label it as "Based Fed posting? Yeah. Need to go into the capital." The exchange ends with a resigned acknowledgment: "I didn't see that coming in. Okay."

We created a list of locations in the city, including police stations, government buildings, and media outlets. We discussed the need to surround the White House and the importance of being willing to take risks for change. We acknowledged the presence of guns and the potential for crisis, emphasizing the need to be proactive. Taking over government buildings and using various tactics, including breaking windows, was considered necessary for achieving our goals. Ultimately, the focus was on removing Trump from power.

The speaker discusses the Transition Integrity Project, a group that planned to forcibly transition Trump out of office if he won the 2020 election. The project involved prominent figures from both major political parties and the national security state. They ran simulations with different scenarios, including one where Trump wins but Biden is still sworn in as president. They even considered getting Black Lives Matter supporters to cause street havoc to make the country ungovernable. The speaker also mentions a deal between the AFL-CIO and the Chamber of Commerce to use union muscle to disrupt dictatorships. This is seen as a color revolution strategy to overthrow governments.

Shutting down a city could be a plan if Biden wins and Trump doesn't concede. If Trump narrowly wins, the strategy might pivot to targeting Democrats to ensure Biden doesn't concede. In DC, identifying Democratic leaders and players is key. Alternatively, if Biden narrowly wins and Trump doesn't concede, the focus shifts to targeting Republicans to pressure Trump to concede. The goal is to think through different scenarios, identify appropriate targets, and determine actions to enable people to organize and prepare.

A group of individuals express their desire to rise up and storm the capital building. A pastor and his church have been picketing a strip club, and the club's employees retaliate. Various speakers mention their involvement with organizations like the CIA and defense firms. They discuss the idea of armed marches and breaching the chambers of Congress. Some believe that government agencies may have agitated the crowd. The pastor receives attention from the FBI and Secret Service.

Exclusive footage reveals coordination among leftist groups, including Shutdown DC and BLM, planning a coup action with assistance from Democrats and federal employees. They aim to disrupt Washington, DC, and other major cities starting November 4th until inauguration day. Discussions include strategies for blockading the White House and shutting down larger areas of the city. Participants are encouraged to gather at BLM Plaza on election night and target key government buildings and police stations. The plan emphasizes creating a crisis to assert control, with a focus on supporting those willing to take decisive action. The left is determined to seize power, regardless of the election outcome.

A speaker urges people to join armed groups and move to Washington DC on January 2nd, 3rd, and 4th to protest against corruption. They emphasize the need for a large, armed presence to deter aggression from the police. Another speaker agrees, stating that if Joe Biden is declared the winner of the election, the republic will be finished. They urge everyone to gather in DC on the 4th at 1 o'clock in the afternoon and contact friends with rifles to join them. The speakers emphasize the importance of individual choice and acting like true Americans.

There are calls for uprisings and unrest in the country, with some referring to the current situation as a dictatorship. There is disagreement about the nature of protests, with one person saying they should be polite and peaceful, while others suggest more aggressive actions like punching or assassinating the president. The focus is on White men as the biggest terror threat, and there are calls to create crowds and confront members of the administration. The speaker also criticizes the current administration for being enemies of the voting system and the constitution. The video ends abruptly.

The speaker discusses coordinating actions through the disruption project or other avenues. Scenarios include a contested election where vote counting needs support. One idea involves organizing car caravans, drawing on experience from COVID-era events. The proposal suggests shutting down major highways like Route 95 from New York to Florida simultaneously with slow-moving car caravans. The speaker also mentions considering shutting down roads around urban or industrial sectors. They reference a website mapping critical infrastructure. The speaker frames these actions as a response to a potential coup, aiming to disrupt the systems and infrastructure needed to maintain power in the "safest way possible."

A speaker urges people to join armed groups and gather in Washington, DC on January 2nd, 3rd, and 4th to fight against corruption and prevent Joe Biden from becoming the president. They emphasize the need for a large number of armed individuals to show strength and deter any aggression from the police. The speaker emphasizes the importance of taking action and encourages listeners to contact friends with rifles and make the choice to join others in DC. They stress the need to act as Americans and not just talk about it.

A group of individuals express their desire to rise up and storm the capital building, calling themselves the Oath Keepers. They discuss their backgrounds, including involvement with defense firms and the CIA. They plan to gather in large groups armed with the intention of surrounding the capital. They mention infiltrators and informants within their ranks. The group's leader, Pastor Bill, receives attention from federal authorities. They express their determination to take over the government and breach the chambers. They believe some agitators may be affiliated with government agencies. Pastor Bill welcomes the attention from law enforcement and wants them to know who they are looking for.

There are calls for uprisings and unrest in the streets, with some referring to the current situation as a dictatorship. The idea of peaceful protests is challenged, and there are discussions about resisting and physically confronting political figures. There are also controversial statements about the biggest terror threat being white men and suggestions of violence towards the president. The integrity of the voting system and the constitution is questioned, and it is emphasized that the opposition will not stop before or after the upcoming election.

In a coup situation, one way to chip away at the systems maintaining power is to take over a local TV station to broadcast a call for people to join. In New York, three antennas control all telecommunications. It's important to consider what communication systems "we" have versus "them." The speaker advocates getting ahead of potential issues by organizing resources and knowing what actions to take so that "we" can deploy rapidly.

Multiple speakers in the video discuss plans for disruptive actions in response to a potential coup or contested election. They mention shutting down the White House, blocking access points, and targeting key government buildings. They also discuss coordinating actions at airports and Union Station to send away members of Congress. The speakers emphasize the need for unity and willingness to take risks to achieve their goals. They mention the possibility of breaking windows and disabling vehicles as forms of protest. The video claims that these plans involve leftist organizations, federal employees, and government contractors.

There are calls for uprisings and unrest in the streets, with some referring to the current situation as a dictatorship. Protests are seen as necessary, even if they are not polite or peaceful. There are controversial statements about violence, including punching and assassinating the president. Some express a desire to blow up the White House or hope for the president's assassination. There are also calls to confront and harass members of the administration in public places. The video ends with a warning that these actions will continue before and after the upcoming election.

A group of public interest organizations and lawmakers are quietly planning to prevent former President Trump from pressuring the US military to carry out his political agenda. The concern is that this could undermine civilian control of the government. The article specifically mentions Trump potentially using the military to suppress domestic protests, similar to the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. The groups involved in this plan were also involved in previous protests against Trump. The fear is that if Trump were to win the election, these tactics would be used to destabilize his entire term and prevent him from stopping protests, even if they turned violent or occupied federal buildings. The speaker warns people to watch a movie about the Serbian revolution to understand how these tactics work.

Undercover footage reveals coordination between leftist organizations, including Shut Down DC and BLM, for a coup action exercise. Democrat party members, federal employees, and intelligence contractors are involved. The plan is to shut down Washington, DC and other major US cities from November 4th until inauguration day. BLM Plaza will be the meeting point on election night, followed by the White House shutdown on the 5th. Key government buildings and police stations are targeted. Members of Congress supporting Trump will be confronted at airports and Union Station. The goal is to create a crisis and take over buildings. The left intends to take control regardless of the election outcome.

If Democrats act like legal scholars, they will lose to Republicans' "guerrilla war" to make Trump president, even if Biden wins legitimately. This is a political, not legal, fight. Congress can take extraordinary, unprecedented actions to stop a coup. On January 3, Democrats could delay seating incoming senators to preserve their majority when the Senate votes to count electoral college votes. This would ensure they can thwart Republican efforts to overturn the will of the people. The Senate votes to seat incoming senators, theoretically. A simple majority of votes should be able to delay seating the incoming senators until after they deal with the county electoral college votes. In the House, the Speaker could order the Sergeant at Arms to remove Mike Pence and the Senate from the House chamber, arguing they can't constitutionally count electoral college votes. These actions would be challenged, but are necessary to counter Republicans overturning the constitutional order. It's about gaining the upper hand legally. We must shift from viewing this as an election to recognizing it as a coup. Members of Congress can organize mass civil disobedience to shut down the capital and delay votes.

Whether Trump tries to steal the election or Biden wins and continues the same policies, popular resistance is needed. Mass protests and coordinated economic disruption may be necessary. Focus on actions that assert the most pressure, but be careful not to present a vulnerable target to far-right vigilantes. "Everybody out" means not trusting politicians or legitimizing institutions that have never looked out for us, and coming together to determine what our lives should be directly. This is not just about Trump or preserving democracy. Even if Biden wins, we must continue to fight against every form of oppression, as there will still be police, prisons, deportations, ecological destruction, and capital. A Biden victory is not the end of this struggle, but the beginning of a new chapter.

People are preparing to flood the House of Representatives. They received a note about doing some housecleaning. They are determined and not backing down. They plan to breach the chambers and take Nancy Pelosi's gavel. If she refuses to let go, they might bring her back too. It's going to be a long and intense week. They express support and caution to each other.

A group of individuals express their desire to rise up and storm the capital building, calling themselves the Oath Keepers. They discuss their backgrounds, including involvement with defense firms and the CIA. They plan to gather in large groups armed with the intention of surrounding the capital. They mention infiltrators and informants within their ranks. Pastor Bill Dunfee, who has been picketing a strip club, receives attention from federal authorities. They express their determination to take over the government and mention the possibility of agitators being from government agencies. The group discusses encounters with the Secret Service and FBI, wanting them to know who they are.