TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker discusses the certification of the Arizona election results by Katie Hobbs and Governor Ducey. The speaker criticizes Katie Hobbs, stating that she was called upon by the legislature to decertify the election due to irregularities and inconsistencies. The speaker describes her as a radical leftist, citing her previous comment referring to a percentage of Arizonans as neo-Nazis. The speaker expresses disappointment in not expecting her to do the right thing.

Speaker 0 believed that the ability to challenge the election results was over. Speaker 1 disagreed, stating that although Congress certified the results, they didn't want to say the election was completely over. Speaker 0 recounted a conversation where someone referred to President Trump as "the boss" and claimed they wouldn't leave power. Speaker 1 clarified that Congress had certified the results but didn't explicitly say the election was over. Speaker 0 pointed out that staying in power doesn't work that way. Speaker 1 concluded by saying they would accept the results of the presidential election.

Miss Waters from California rises to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. The objection is in writing but not signed by a senator. The chair advises that the rules require a senator's signature. Miss Waters mentions gross violations of the voting rights act in Florida but acknowledges that the objection is not signed by a senator. The chair thanks Miss Waters but states that the point of order may not be received.

Speaker 0 expresses a view on religion and national character, saying: “if a country doesn't have religion, doesn't have faith, doesn't have God, it's gonna be very hard to be a good country.” He adds, “This It'll be fixed. It'll be fine. You won't have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians. I love you Christians.” He states, “I'm a Christian. I'm a Christian. I'm a Christian.” He admits doubt about heaven: “I don't think there's anything gonna get me in heaven. Okay? I really don't. I think I think I'm not maybe heaven bound. I may be in heaven right now as we fly an air force, but I'm not sure I I'm gonna be able to make heaven.” He claims to have been “really saved” by “somebody very special,” and repeats: “A high beak. A high beak. A high beak.” Speaker 1 recounts the presidential oath ceremony: “When US President Donald Trump took its oath of office, he had his right hand raised, but his left wasn't on the Bible. But does it matter? Academics tell Reuters that it was an oversight and it doesn't have much practical impact, although the moment has gone viral online.” A professor is quoted that “the oath is to the constitution.” He notes that “Two bibles were held by Trump's wife Melania as she stood next to him at the ceremony.” Speaker 2 presents claims about Trump’s faith: “Trump converted to Judaism two years ago and joined Chabad Lubavitch Synagogue in New York City according to a high level White House official.” A figure named Mister Goldberg says the story has allegedly been held by CNN's editors for months, but will be released soon. David Elias Goldberg, a fellow at the Jewish Center of Antisemitic Study, has also interviewed the White House source. The source says Trump was pushed by Ivanka and Jared Kushner to join the faith; Trump initially resisted, fearing it would threaten his evangelical Christian base, but then changed his mind and “officially converted in early two thousand seventeen.” The ceremony was private and guarded for nearly two years. The White House appears prepared to release this information gradually, and by summer, Trump is expected to address his new faith in an evening televised news conference. He is described as “the most pro Israel president in the history of America,” having given Israel “every single thing that they wanted,” and being “about to give them war with Iran.” The question is raised: “Has he converted?” A Times of Israel article is cited: “Trump, the first Jewish president of The United States.” It is emphasized: “Now that's not us saying that. That's times of Israel.” The discussion notes that Times of Israel is a Jewish nation, and that “these people do like Israel.” Speaker 0 interjects: “Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on.” Speaker 3 adds: “And he loves Israel too. Six years ago, I was up here. And I said, this is our first Jewish president. This is our first Jewish president. This is our first Jewish president. Not not consecutive. We”—and then Speaker 0 closes with: “thank you for everything, Joel. We thank you for everything.”

The president and his lawyers asked me to reject votes, which would have caused chaos by turning the issue over to the House of Representatives. I hope the government can prove criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt, but it's important for the American people to know that they didn't just ask me to pause. They wanted me to overturn the election by returning and rejecting votes.

The speaker questions the certification of the election results, stating that the margin of victory is less than 1%. They mention testimony from the secretary of state's counsel, who sent letters to 8,000 people who voted illegally, advising them not to vote in the US senate race. This number is almost three-fourths of the margin of victory. The speaker also points out that there is a 10% margin that is not accurate. They ask how the senate and house can stand by the certification.

This video discusses the Bronson case, which has made it to the Supreme Court. The case argues that there was a legal obligation to investigate the 2020 election under the Electoral Reform Act. The Supreme Court reached out to the Bronson brothers and asked them to rewrite their case as a national emergency. The government appointed a US attorney to represent the 388 members of Congress who voted to accept the electoral votes without investigating. The Supreme Court now has the power to dismiss these individuals from office, including President Biden and Vice President Harris, if they engage in any questionable actions. The video suggests that the Supreme Court has a loaded gun and can take action if necessary.

The chair hands the certificate of the electors for president and vice president of the state of Florida to the tellers. An objection to Florida’s votes is presented in writing, signed by a number of members of the House of Representatives, but not by a member of the Senate. A member of the Congressional Black Caucus states that he is objecting to the counting of the 25 electoral votes from Florida, thanking the president for the inquiry, and says the objection is signed on behalf of his diverse constituents and the millions of Americans disenfranchised by Florida’s inaccurate vote count. The clerk reports the objection, noting that it is signed by a member of the House and a United States senator. The objection to Ohio’s electoral votes is read, raised on the ground that the votes were not “under all of the known circumstances regularly given.” It is signed by Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio and Barbara Boxer of California. Another speaker says the objection today is raised because there are irregularities across the country with regard to voting, and that Congress has an obligation to step up to the plate and correct them. A further speaker dedicates the Ohio objection to Michael Moore, the producer of the documentary Fahrenheit 9/11. A speaker notes that, first of all, no election official in Ohio has provided any explanation for the massive and widespread irregularity in the state, including machines in Mahoning County that recorded “carry” votes for Bush. There is a sense of concern about irregularities across the nation. In closing, another speaker remarks that people are dying all over the world, many from his state, in the name of bringing democracy to distant parts of the world, and asks, “Let’s fix it here, and let’s do it first thing out.”

After losing the election, Trump spread false claims and urged his supporters to rally on January 6th to protest the congressional vote counting. At the rally near the White House, he called on Vice President Mike Pence to intervene in the proceedings. Trump emphasized the need for strength, stating, "You’ll never take back our country with weakness." He expressed hope that Pence would stand up for the Constitution and the country, warning that he would be disappointed if Pence did not act.

I do not concede the election. Many believe there were issues on election day. The president claims the election was rigged, with lawsuits having merit. Legal remedies must be pursued. Georgia was rigged in favor of Biden.

The video highlights instances of vote manipulation in the election database, specifically focusing on Donald Trump's votes. It reveals that votes for Trump were switched and removed from his total, making it appear as if there were no changes. In three counties, over 30,000 votes for Trump disappeared. The video provides a clear example of this manipulation, where Trump's votes were switched with Biden's in a matter of minutes. This type of manipulation can go undetected in state reporting due to the time lag between each state update.

Speaker 0: They reject the rule of law and the will of the people, refusing to accept the election results. Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi, May 16, 2017, claimed our election was hijacked and there is no doubt about it. Speaker 2: Even if you run a great campaign, become the nominee, the election can still be stolen from you. Speaker 0: Trump did not truly win the 2016 election; he lost. Speaker 1: He knows he's an illegitimate president who didn't really win. How do we fight against him in 2020? He's illegitimate. Speaker 3: He's illegitimate, and my biggest fear is that he'll do it again with the help of his pal Vlad. We'll be stuck with him for 6 more terrifying years. Speaker 0: Would you be my vice presidential candidate? I agree. Speaker 1: Bush versus Gore, a court took away the presidency. Al Gore was the true winner. Speaker 4: I believe I won the last presidential election. They stole it. Speaker 0: Al Gore won that election, or at least I think he did. Speaker 5: Rolling Stone questioned if the 2004 election was stolen. Speaker 4: I witnessed troubling evidence that not every vote was counted in Illinois 4 years ago. Speaker 1: The November 2, 2004 election was not transparent or accurate. There are legitimate questions about our election system's accuracy. Despite the final tally, I have one affirmative statement to make.

Speaker 0 discusses a transcript of a call from President Trump trying to overturn the election. They play an audio clip where Trump mentions criminal events. Speaker 1 feels threatened by Trump's comments about overseas ballots. Speaker 2 thought Trump believed he won the race but had investigated all allegations.

On this January 6th, it's important to remember that the Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022 clarifies the vice president's role as purely ministerial on this day; the election results are certified by the voters, not her. While some might view her actions differently, she simply stated that the situation is unremarkable. Additionally, congratulations are in order for the Democrats, as this is the first election since 1988 where a Republican won without the Democrats attempting to overturn the results in Congress. It's a significant moment worth acknowledging, even if it has been mentioned before.

Speaker 0: Jim Jordan played a significant role in Trump's attempt to challenge the election results. Speaker 1: Trump requested a vote recount, which is not the same as overthrowing the government. However, some believe the media's continuous portrayal of this narrative is influenced by project Mockingbird. Regardless, everyone involved is part of it.

Miss Waters from California rises to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. The objection is in writing but not signed by a senator. The chair advises that a senator's signature is required. Miss Waters mentions gross violations of the Voting Rights Act in Florida, but the objection is still not signed by a senator. The chair thanks Miss Waters but states that the objection may not be received based on the previously stated point of order.

This situation is unprecedented. The president of the United States is accused of trying to steal the election. He claims it is election interference, but his scheme to use fake electors and steal the presidency is the real interference. There are doubts about the lawsuit, but it exists because of Trump's actions. He is disqualified because he attempted to steal the presidency from the American people.

Speaker 0 claimed the former president was illegitimate for 4 years. Speaker 1 argued about conceding the election and potential violence in the future. They debated about the Capitol attack and the death of Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick. Speaker 1 denied that anyone died during the attack, but Speaker 0 mentioned Sicknick's death.

Representative Moe Brooks plans to challenge the election results on January 6th, claiming the House and Senate have the authority to reject electoral college votes from states with flawed election systems. Brooks believes that Donald Trump won if only lawful votes were counted. Brooks asserts that an honest voting system is the bedrock of a republic. He states he will object to submissions from states with flawed systems and needs a senator to join him to force a vote. He urges the American people to contact their representatives and demand they co-sponsor objections to flawed electoral college vote totals, or risk losing their vote. Brooks has not spoken with Republican leaders Kevin McCarthy or Mitch McConnell. He claims millions of illegal votes were cast, citing illegal aliens, non-citizens, and violations of article one section four of the United States constitution.

The transcript covers the January 6, 2021 events at the Capitol, detailing the sequence from the march to the Capitol to the initially escalating and then intensified police response. - At the outset, a speaker calls on Congress to confront an “egregious assault on our democracy,” and asserts that the crowd will walk down to the Capitol to demand that Congress “only count the electors who have been lawfully slated.” A promise is made that participants will march to the Capitol “peacefully and patriotically” to have their voices heard. - Around 12:30 PM, a large group is seen heading toward the Capitol from eastbound Pennsylvania Avenue. A speaker notes that President Trump “won’t be finished speaking at the Ellipse for another forty minutes.” There is mention that Mike Pence “has to agree to send it back.” - By 12:45 PM, footage shows a wall of people arriving about a block west of the Capitol, gathering at Peace Circle where Pennsylvania Avenue ends and becomes Pennsylvania Walkway, leading to the West Side of the Capitol. A security camera view from the exterior dome shows the crowd rapidly filling the area in front of the West Plaza, with those entering Capitol grounds potentially seeing no prior warnings or barriers. - Inside the Capitol, Vice President Mike Pence enters the House chamber to convene the joint session to certify electoral votes, while President Donald Trump continues speaking at the Ellipse, seemingly unaware of the crowd at the Capitol. Outside, DC Capitol Police Deputy Chief Waldo orders the less-lethal team into position. - A sequence of tactical movements follows: a request for less-lethal teams to move up from the Upper West Terrace and an elevated position being prepared. The team is described as “not compliant.” Less-lethal munitions are discussed, with multiple warnings reportedly given, though some warnings are not captured on video. - President Trump finishes his speech at the Ellipse around 01:12 PM. A split-screen view shows simultaneous events in real time. - A separate exchange references the objection from Arizona, with “Is the objection in writing and signed by a senator?” answered “Yes. It is.” Representatives Gosar and Senator Ted Cruz then make a challenge on the floor of the House. - At 01:13 PM, MPD officer Daniel Thou arrives at the southwest plaza with a body camera showing him and nearby officers spraying demonstrators with an inflammatory agent. By 01:15 PM, Thou crosses the line, engages with demonstrators, discharges two rounds from his taser (ECD), and then urges others to “start shooting what they have into the crowd.” - The less-lethal team fires into the crowd for a third time at 01:17 PM. A second wave of DC Metropolitan Police officers arrives on the East Side of the Capitol, bringing explosive ammunition rounds that will be distributed to West Plaza officers. Officer Tara Tindle crouches on the ground, readying CS gas rounds. A scene commander authorizes explosive deployment into the crowd. - By 01:30 PM, officers push the crowd back and establish a police line on the Southwest side, which is held for about an hour. Officers deploy “Steamboat” rounds and other munitions as the crowd is contained. - Around 01:32 PM, an officer laments that throwing grenades into the crowd will make things worse, but moments later another officer seems to change course and reaches for additional munitions. Discussions about using triple chasers and the risks of fire are noted, with one officer being reprimanded for earlier smoke deployment. - A captain directs Officer Thao to hold off discharging CS gas, while Thao acquires a Stinger round and a baton round to fire into the crowd. At 02:18 PM, a tense officer-to-officer exchange reveals acknowledgment that innocent people are being affected, with one officer stating, “Nothing's gonna help… we're taking out one and ten of them are getting way easier,” and that the crowd is being multiplied by being hit.

The video highlights instances of ballot irregularities in the 2020 election. It shows examples where ballots were not filled out correctly, yet still counted for Joe Biden. It also mentions a ballot that was thrown out, which had votes for Donald Trump and other Republican candidates. According to Just the News, many adjudicated ballots had marks removed next to Trump's name, allowing for additional marks next to Biden's name. In total, 1,341 marks were removed, which accounts for over 11% of the votes in a race decided by 11,779 votes. The video suggests that this is just one type of fraud.

The people who wanted the proceedings that day shut down were not Republicans. They were Democrats. They did not want the airing of all of the evidence of fraud, which would be two hours per state. You had senators working with with Republican house members to contest those results, ask for the ten day audit, and have two hours of debate over it. Democrats did not want that. It was the Democrats who wanted the proceedings that day shut down, not Republicans. And, of course, they got they got what they wanted.

On January 6th, the speaker explains that the riot was incited by the feds because they wanted to prevent the debate and adjudication of the election in the Senate. They wanted to take away Trump's presidency and destroy the executive branch. Steve Bannon refused to testify to the committee because of executive privilege, which legally prevented him from sharing his conversations with Trump. The speaker believes that Obama's ego is controlling things behind the scenes, and Joe Biden is not the best person to run the government. The riot disrupted the planned debate, and Pence was never asked to overturn the election, just to send it back to the states for further review.

Speaker 0 asks if the speaker is trying to say that President Trump will still be president after January 20th. Speaker 1 responds that it depends on what happens on Wednesday and that's why they have the debate. Speaker 0 disagrees, stating that the states certify the election and Congress doesn't have the right to overturn it. Speaker 1 mentions the 12th Amendment and a statute from the 1800s that allows objections and certification in court. Speaker 0 brings up the Tilden Hayes race and how all states have certified their elections. Speaker 1 clarifies that they are referring to the statute that governs what Congress does on January 6th, allowing for debate and certification. They emphasize that this is their only opportunity to raise an objection. They also mention not having standing to file lawsuits.

Are you prepared to say under oath that Donald Trump lost the presidential contest to Joe Biden in 2020? President Biden is the president of the United States, having been duly sworn in after a peaceful transition of power. Trump left office and was overwhelmingly elected in 2024. Do you have any doubts that Joe Biden had the necessary electoral votes to be elected president in 2020? As a prosecutor, I accept that Joe Biden is the president. I witnessed many things during my time in Pennsylvania as an advocate for the campaign. While I accept the results, I believe we should all want election integrity and ensure our elections are free and fair, following the rules and laws. I think that question deserves a yes or no, and your lengthy answer suggests you weren't prepared to answer yes.