TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

If a genetic sequence is injected that causes the body to manufacture a foreign protein, the body recognizes it as an invasion and launches an attack on cells. This autoimmune reaction can occur anywhere the injection lands, potentially causing myocarditis or a heart attack if it lands in the heart, stroke or neurological conditions if in the brain, blindness if in the eyes, or sterilization if in the ovaries. The body is being made to manufacture something that does not belong in it. The speaker believes the so-called vaccines encode spike proteins, which are acutely toxic to blood cells, prompting blood clots, and to nerve cells, causing them to malfunction. The body is forced to make something directly toxic, intentionally. The injectables are wrapped in lipid nanoparticles.

COVID-19 injections are associated with neuropsychiatric disorders, according to an FDA and CDC study. The speaker claims that psychosis is 440 times more likely, dementia 140 times, schizophrenia 315 times, suicidal thoughts 150 times, and homicidal ideation 25 times. Brain clots are allegedly 3,000 times more likely, depression 530 times, and violent behavior 80 times. Cognitive decline is purportedly 115 times more likely and delusions 50 times. The speaker believes psychiatric harm is caused by the accumulation of toxic spike proteins, mRNA, lipid nanoparticles, and other unknown components.

mRNA and DNA injections are deemed unnecessary, ineffective, and unsafe in this symposium. The idea of injecting foreign proteins into the body without control over their production is considered insane. The cells coerced to produce these proteins may be attacked by the immune system, leading to inflammation and potential organ damage. Additionally, the choice to use toxic spike proteins, encased in toxic lipid nanoparticles, and granting emergency use authorization for this injection is seen as the height of insanity. The number of injections taken also plays a significant role.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They argue that when the body is instructed to make a piece of foreign non-human protein, every cell that expresses it is seen as an invasion, leading the immune system to attack and potentially harm the body's own cells. The speaker also claims that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines intentionally chose the spike protein, which is biologically active and potentially toxic, as a component of their vaccines. They find this choice unusual and believe it to be a deliberate decision.

Studies show that more people who received the injections are ending up in the hospital and dying. Repeat injections can lead to tolerance issues by the immune system, preventing an effective immune response. The speaker is focused on the damages caused by these products and believes that the voices of the injured have been taken away. They hypothesize that the spike protein in the injections could cause hyper inflammation, especially in people with preexisting conditions. The speaker also mentions that the contents of the injection were supposed to remain at the injection site, but evidence suggests they can travel to the ovaries. They suspect that there is information being withheld from the public.

mRNA and DNA injections are deemed unnecessary, ineffective, and unsafe in this symposium. The idea of injecting foreign proteins into the body without control over their production is considered insane. There is no control over which cells produce the protein or in what quantity, which varies greatly among individuals. The immune system attacks cells coerced to produce and present the foreign protein, leading to inflammation and potential organ damage. Additionally, the choice to use toxic spike proteins, package mRNA in toxic lipid nanoparticles, and grant emergency use authorization is seen as the height of insanity.

The speaker argues that genetic vaccines are totally unacceptable and defines the introduction of transgenes into the human body as gene therapy, questioning how this can be considered acceptable practice for creating vaccines. They assert that encapsulating messenger RNA in nanoparticles and administering it leads to off-target effects, with the effects starting from the ovaries to the brain, liver, spleen, and bone marrow. They emphasize that the biggest problem is going to the bone marrow and the reproductive organs like the ovaries, and then every possible organ. Regarding spike proteins, the speaker states that spike proteins are still detected in the rash after more than a year, which they interpret as evidence that messenger RNA is producing spike proteins. They contend that there is no way for a year-old spike protein to remain in the rash and be detected. Personal choices are also mentioned: they did not choose to get vaccinated because they think it was a foolish decision from the beginning. They have not even opted for the flu shot because they consider it an unwise choice.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They argue that when the body is instructed to make a piece of foreign non-human protein, every cell that expresses it is seen as an invasion, leading the immune system to attack and potentially harm the body's own cells. The speaker also points out that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same part of the virus, the spike protein, which they believe is biologically active and potentially toxic. They suggest that this choice was intentional and not a coincidence.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, claiming that they contain deliberate toxicities. They argue that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker believes that this mechanism of toxicity is intentional and points out that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the spike protein as a target, which they claim is biologically active and potentially harmful. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution, suggesting a deliberate decision.

The current vaccines contain harmful monkey virus sequences and toxic lipid nanoparticles, which are not meant for human use. Many people have already experienced injuries and deaths from these products, but the full effects may take years to manifest. Research shows that these gene therapies can create abnormal proteins, potentially leading to autoimmune diseases. The idea of using this technology for cancer treatment raises concerns, as it disrupts natural immune functions. Health and wellness cannot be achieved through injections or pills; they come from a healthy lifestyle. Questions arise about why some countries, like China, do not administer these genetic injections to their military. Informed consent is crucial, but many patients are unaware of the risks and that these products are not fully approved. The technology remains as unsafe as it was in the past.

"Now, when these genes, packages, enter the cells, then the cells will start making this damn virus protein which is called the spike." "This is going to happen to any mRNA or gene based vaccine." "Those packages are going to cause your cells in the blood vessels to create this protein and this protein is going to be a foreign non self protein that is going to be recognised by any antibodies that you have and these antibodies are going to be there after the first injection." "If any of these vessels is clogged because of a thrombus or because it's injured, the cells that are being supplied by oxygen are going to die." "So if these tiny vessels in the brain or the heart are damaged, you are damaged for life. You will never be the same again."

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They explain that normally the immune system only attacks foreign substances, but when mRNA is introduced to the body, it instructs cells to produce a foreign protein, causing the immune system to attack the cells. The speaker believes this mechanism of toxicity is intentional and points out that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same spike protein, which they claim is biologically active and potentially harmful. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution.

mRNA and DNA injections are deemed unnecessary, ineffective, and unsafe in this symposium. The idea of injecting foreign proteins into the body without control over their production is considered insane. The cells coerced to produce these proteins may be attacked by the immune system, leading to inflammation and potential damage to organs. Additionally, the choice of toxic spike protein, packaging mRNA in toxic lipid nanoparticles, and granting emergency use authorization for this injection is seen as the height of insanity. It is crucial to recognize the significant difference between taking one or one hundred sleeping pills simultaneously.

The speaker argues that mRNA and DNA injections are unnecessary, ineffective, and unsafe. They question the idea of injecting foreign proteins into the body without control over their production, which can vary between individuals. The immune system attacks cells forced to produce these foreign proteins, leading to inflammation and potential organ damage. The speaker also criticizes the use of toxic spike proteins and lipid nanoparticles in these injections, considering it the height of insanity.

Truth is out. Scientists are now confirming what many have long suspected. The COVID shots don't just impact your immune system. They can damage your brain and devastate mental health, and the evidence is overwhelming. A recent wave of studies have revealed shocking increases in ischemic strokes up forty four percent, hemorrhagic strokes up fifty percent, transient ischemic strokes or mini strokes up sixty seven percent, myasthenia gravis, a debilitating autoimmune condition up over seventy one percent, Alzheimer's up twenty two percent, cognitive impairment up nearly a hundred and thirty eight percent, depression up over sixty eight percent, anxiety disorders up nearly forty four percent, and sleep disorders up over ninety three percent, all linked to one thing, toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain. This isn't a conspiracy theory. There's a documented peer reviewed research published studies by documented experts, including by epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who says using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or even years was one of the worst ideas in medical history. So what can you do?

The mRNA platform is effective but has a flaw: it can cause autoimmune disorders by producing foreign proteins in cells. The challenge is to target only specific cells and avoid damage to vital organs. The pandemic allowed the emergency use authorization of mRNA vaccines, bypassing safety measures. However, a large portion of the population has already accepted this technology. To address the issue, a solution could be to replace the spike protein with a different protein that doesn't have flaws. But if the problem lies in any foreign protein transcribed by cells, the immune system may still target vital organs.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They explain that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker also points out that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the spike protein as their target, which they find unusual and potentially dangerous. They question why these companies would select a biologically active and potentially toxic part of the virus. Overall, the speaker believes there are significant concerns about the safety of these vaccines.

mRNA and DNA injections are deemed unnecessary, ineffective, and unsafe in this symposium. The idea of injecting foreign proteins into the body without control over their production is considered insane. The cells coerced to produce these proteins may be attacked by the immune system, leading to inflammation and potential damage to organs. Additionally, the choice of toxic spike protein, packaging mRNA in toxic lipid nanoparticles, and granting emergency use authorization for this injection is seen as the epitome of insanity. The dosage of these injections is also emphasized, as it can greatly impact their effects.

The spike protein from the COVID-19 virus circulates in the body and can land in multiple organs, causing various diseases. Lab studies have shown that even without the virus, just injecting the spike protein can induce the same lung, vascular, heart, and brain diseases as COVID-19. The spike protein is considered the toxin responsible for causing the disease. This raises questions about why we are injecting something that is essentially a toxin into the human body, as it is not a traditional vaccine.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, claiming that they contain deliberate toxicities. They explain how the immune system normally distinguishes between self and foreign substances, but when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode. They argue that this mechanism of toxicity can lead to various side effects and should not be used on a mass scale. The speaker also suggests that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines intentionally chose the spike protein, which they believe is biologically active and potentially harmful. Another speaker briefly mentions the benefits of Nattokinase, an enzyme derived from fermented soy, in dissolving blood clots.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, stating that they contain deliberate toxicities. They explain that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker also highlights that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same spike protein, which they claim is biologically active and toxic. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution, suggesting intentionality.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, claiming that they contain deliberate toxicities. They argue that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker believes that this mechanism of toxicity is intentional and points out that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the spike protein, which can trigger blood coagulation, as the target. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution and suggest that this is a deliberate decision.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these materials. They explain how the immune system normally distinguishes between self and foreign substances, but when mRNA is used to make a piece of a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode. The speaker argues that these vaccines cannot be safe for mass market use as they may cause the immune system to attack its own cells. They also claim that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines intentionally chose the spike protein, which they believe is biologically active and potentially toxic.

Nicholas Holcher, an epidemiologist and foundation administrator at the McCullough Foundation, appears on the WiderWake Media Podcast to discuss what he calls harms from the mRNA COVID vaccines and to critique mainstream approaches to the pandemic and public health policy. - Vaccine definitions and mRNA technology - Pre-2000 definition: a vaccine is an injectable or oral product that introduces a killed part of a virus or an inactivated form to the body so that encountering a wild-type version would not infect or would cause a less severe illness. - He asserts that mRNA injections are not vaccines: they are a gene transfer platform using modified messenger RNA with long persistence in the body (via N1-methylpseudouridine), delivered in lipid nanoparticles. He claims these bubbles distribute systemically, including to the brain, heart, bone marrow, and reproductive system, and that they instruct cells to produce a spike protein, effectively turning organs into “toxic spike protein production factories.” He says this leads to autoimmune attack on those tissues and contributes to adverse events, including myocarditis, strokes, immune destruction, and “turbo cancers.” - History and purpose of mRNA in vaccines - According to Holcher, work on this technology existed for decades but animals testing showed high mortality or sterilization in ferrets and mice, preventing approval except under a declared global emergency. He contends the COVID-19 crisis enabled emergency use authorization across Western countries, with ulterior aims to inject the globe with mRNA technology. - Global impact and uptake - He estimates about 70% of the global population received at least one COVID-19 injection (mRNA or viral vector). He notes Eastern countries used non-mRNA platforms (e.g., AstraZeneca/J&J in some places; Sinovac elsewhere) but that uptake in the West was high. - Harms and evidence - Excess deaths: cites a study by Dennis Brancourt et al. estimating around 17 million deaths worldwide as a result of COVID injections (as of September 2023); he claims US deaths could be in the hundreds of thousands to millions. - Turbo cancers: cites multiple studies in 2023 showing increased risk of seven cancer types (colorectal, bladder, breast, thyroid, prostate, etc.) in vaccinated groups; cites a major cancer journal, OncoTarget, reporting hundreds of turbo cancer cases across 27 countries, with Pfizer contributing most cases. Holcher also mentions his own group’s work with Neo7 Bioscience documenting genomic integration of vaccine-derived mRNA in a stage IV bladder cancer patient (31-year-old woman) with a segment of mRNA found in circulating tumor DNA on chromosome 19; another study reported thousands of dysregulated genes in post-vaccine cancers, including p53, KRAS, and BRCA. - Definition of turbo cancer: per Merrick et al., rapid, aggressive tumor progression with sudden onset and early metastasis, often in younger individuals, and resistant to treatment. - Fertility, pregnancy, and autism - Fertility: cites studies suggesting fertility impacts, including Karaman et al. finding depletion of primordial follicles in rats after mRNA vaccination; Manichi et al. reporting 33% lower conception rates in vaccinated women in Denmark; a study indicating a ~20% drop in sperm concentration and motility with no recovery over five months. - Autism: asserts a large body of evidence linking vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders, citing a 136-study review with 107 studies finding positive associations between vaccines and neurodevelopmental issues, including autism, attributed to toxicity and immune system disruption, particularly in children with high vaccine exposure and reduced detox capacity (CYP450 impairment). - Other topics tied to vaccines and public response - The COVID-19 period and vaccine skepticism: claims the pandemic catalyzed a large anti-vaccine movement because people were compelled to take an experimental gene therapy product. - Sam Altman and gene editing: discusses Altman’s Preventive venture with the aim to reduce heritable diseases via in utero gene editing but warns of the path to designer babies and the potential for harm in early-iteration edits, citing prior CRISPR experiments on human embryos that produced deformed offspring or nonviable results. - AI, workers, and future society: predicts two-tier society with implanted or enhanced individuals and a replacement of human labor by robots and AI systems; discusses military and surveillance ambitions in gene editing and AI augmentation. - Mental health and digital life: references a randomized trial showing that turning off mobile Internet improved depression scores and well-being to an extent comparable to or greater than antidepressants. - World Health Organization (WHO): notes the US has pulled out of the WHO, arguing this is good for the US but potentially harmful for others still in the organization; expresses concerns about the pandemic treaty and ongoing global health governance, including vaccine passport-style surveillance. - FDA and public health policy: acknowledges some shifts (e.g., cutting doses from the childhood schedule) but argues the FDA remains compromised and too aligned with vaccine industry interests; criticizes the removal of a potential black box warning for vaccines and calls for more accountability. - Resources and contact - Holcher invites listeners to follow him on X (Twitter) at @nichulsher and to read their work on focalpoints.com and through McCullough’s network. Note: The transcript presents Holcher’s claims and interpretations about vaccines, turbo cancers, autism, fertility, and policy changes. The summary reproduces these points without endorsement or evaluation.

Thomas Binder argues that there has never been a pandemic of a killer virus, but there has been a pandemic of cowards. He claims doctors observe a pandemic of severe illnesses and sudden unexpected deaths from heart attack, myocarditis, aortic dissection, stroke, pulmonary embolism, thrombosis and inflammation of other organs, disseminated intravascular coagulation, increased infections including COVID, cancer, autoimmune diseases, infertility, miscarriage, and many more. He asserts that the modified RNA vaccine platform represents the greatest medical crime in human history and a humanitarian disaster of unprecedented proportions. He states that the pharmaceutical industry is moving all vaccinations to the modified RNA vaccine platform. Binder argues that the modified RNA vaccine platform is nonsensical and life threatening, identifying two fundamental flaws: first, injecting the construction plan for a protein foreign to the body without any control over which body cells will produce it, in what dose, and for how long; second, the cells coerced to produce the foreign protein and present it on the surface will be mistakenly recognized by the immune system as foreign, leading to destruction much like the rejection of a foreign organ. He contends the alleged modified RNA vaccination coerces the body to produce a toxin in an unknown dose and for an unknown period, and literally transforms parts of the body into an alien. Therefore, he asserts, the entire modified RNA vaccine platform must be banned immediately. Binder claims that governments are negotiating a plandemic treaty with the WHO, and if signed, the WHO will be placed above the constitution of the country, resulting in loss of freedom of choice for citizens, governments, and parliaments. He states that “who controls the who controls the world.” He proclaims that the only reasonable, 100% effective and safe prevention of another criminal pandemic is the immediate smashing of the WHO into a thousand pieces. Addressing those who have been injected, or experienced side effects, he encourages hope that more responsible doctors and scientists are researching ways to treat even the most complex side effects. He likens the situation to smoking: it is almost never too late to quit and live healthier. Regardless of injection status, he urges listeners to wake up, stand up, and tell manufacturers, alleged experts, government, parliament, generals, and authorities who have failed in the Covid scandal that enough is enough. He calls for stepping back and standing in courts, arguing this for the sake of a future worth living for children and grandchildren.