reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Jordan Peterson discusses his experiences and insights during a conversation with Joe Rogan. He shares his preference for wearing suits, which he attributes to his father's influence as a teacher who wore them to show respect. Peterson mentions that his unique suits have inspired many audience members to dress formally for his lectures, with a significant portion of attendees now wearing suits. The conversation shifts to Peterson's new book, "We Who Wrestle With God," where he explores the concept of wrestling with one's conscience and the moral decisions that shape reality. He emphasizes the importance of language and how it can either manipulate or convey truth, linking this to the biblical notion that the word is foundational to reality. Peterson discusses the significance of responsibility and adventure, asserting that embracing responsibility leads to a meaningful life. He uses biblical stories, particularly those of Moses and Abraham, to illustrate how taking on challenges and responsibilities can lead to personal transformation and societal benefit. The dialogue also touches on the role of psychedelics in understanding consciousness and reality, with Rogan sharing his views on their historical significance in human development. Peterson acknowledges the potential benefits of psychedelics but warns of the need for responsible use and understanding. As the conversation progresses, they address the current state of higher education, with Peterson expressing concern over the ideological capture of universities and the decline in educational quality. He introduces his initiative, Peterson Academy, aimed at providing high-quality education at a lower cost, emphasizing the importance of traditional values and critical thinking. Peterson critiques the current societal trends regarding gender identity and the medical practices surrounding it, highlighting the dangers of rushing children into irreversible decisions without proper guidance. He argues that many professionals in the field are aware of the issues but remain silent due to fear of backlash. The discussion concludes with Peterson reflecting on the challenges faced by society, the importance of personal responsibility, and the need for a return to foundational values in education and community.

On Origins Podcast, Lauren Schwarz and Arthur Rousseau discuss their chapter in The War on Science, focusing on gender-affirming care (GAC) and medical standards. They argue that the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) wields influence, with U.S. medical bodies deferring to it, while the UK’s Cass report and countries have begun to curtail such care. They describe WPATH’s standards of care (SOC 8) as presenting itself as evidence-based, lifesaving care, yet note published reviews finding the strength of the evidence often low or indirect, and that guidelines are not always consistent with the underlying literature. They recount that Johns Hopkins underwent political pressure to withdraw systematic reviews and that WPATH later imposed an approval mechanism over future publications. The speakers condemn the reliance on “lived experience” over rigorous evidence, and highlight concerns about age restrictions being removed and consent for minors to hormonal or surgical interventions. They cite a lack of long-term outcome data, no conclusive evidence that gender-affirming care reduces suicide, and cases illustrating the risks of messaging to afraid families. They call for better education, transparency, and a return to science-based medicine, while referencing the Tennessee minors’ care case and urging global alignment.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the recent incident involving a Chinese spy balloon that was shot down after being spotted over the U.S. She highlights the public's fascination with the event and the political fallout, noting President Biden's administration's delayed response and attempts to deflect blame onto the Trump administration. Veteran Navy SEAL Rob O'Neill joins the discussion, emphasizing the balloon's potential for espionage and the implications of the U.S. response. O'Neill explains that the balloon was maneuverable and could gather intelligence, raising concerns about U.S. air defense vulnerabilities. He criticizes the Biden administration for not acting sooner and suggests that the military should have shot it down over Montana, where it posed less risk to civilians. The conversation shifts to the broader issue of U.S.-China relations, with O'Neill asserting that America appears weak and that China is testing U.S. resolve. The discussion transitions to the Grammys, where Kelly expresses concern over the content being presented to children, particularly a performance by Sam Smith that she interprets as provocative. O'Neill and Kelly discuss the cultural implications of such performances and the influence of media on societal values. The show then features a segment on a new documentary titled "Damaged: The Trans of America's Kids," which focuses on the experiences of detransitioners. Guests Chrissy Clark and Chloe Cole discuss the necessity of sharing these stories, emphasizing that many individuals who transition at a young age later regret their decisions. Cole shares her personal journey, including her experiences with body dysmorphia and the impact of social media on her transition. Clark explains that the documentary aims to highlight the voices of those who feel marginalized in the current discourse surrounding gender identity. They discuss the challenges faced by detransitioners, including medical complications and the lack of support from healthcare professionals after transitioning. Cole expresses her desire to help others who are struggling with similar issues and emphasizes the importance of parental guidance in these situations. The conversation concludes with a discussion about the politicization of gender identity and the financial motivations behind the medical establishment's support for transitioning minors. Both guests advocate for a more cautious approach to gender transition in children, stressing the need for thorough evaluation and support.

Jordan Peterson emphasizes the importance of self-acceptance while also advocating for personal responsibility and growth. He argues that identity is multifaceted, shaped by relationships with family, community, and societal ideals, and cannot be reduced to mere self-perception. Sara Stockton, a therapist with extensive experience in transgender issues, shares her concerns about the current approach to gender dysphoria treatment, particularly in children. She recounts her background in developing assessment guidelines for transgender youth and her shift away from gender-affirming practices after observing troubling trends in her practice. Stockton discusses her experiences with children questioning their gender identity, highlighting the confusion and disorientation these discussions can cause. She expresses alarm over the rush to medical interventions, noting that the current standard of care has shifted from thorough assessments to quick evaluations, often leading to irreversible decisions made without adequate understanding of the implications. She raises concerns about the lack of informed consent regarding the long-term effects of hormone treatments and surgeries, particularly for minors. The conversation touches on the societal pressures surrounding gender identity, including the influence of social media and the normalization of diverse identities. Stockton notes that many children presenting with gender dysphoria do not have a clear understanding of their feelings and that the current environment encourages rapid transitions without sufficient exploration of underlying issues. She warns against the potential for psychological epidemics, drawing parallels to past trends in mental health crises among adolescents. Both Peterson and Stockton critique the current therapeutic landscape, where affirming a child's self-identified gender often takes precedence over comprehensive psychological evaluation. They discuss the implications of this shift for the mental health of children and the ethical responsibilities of therapists. Stockton concludes by expressing her commitment to advocating for children and ensuring they receive appropriate care, free from the pressures of societal trends and medical interventions that may not be in their best interest.

Jordan Peterson interviews Abigail Shrier, author of "Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters." Shrier explains she wrote the book after a mother reached out about her daughter, who transitioned to transgender without prior symptoms of gender dysphoria. Shrier highlights a surge in teenage girls identifying as transgender, claiming this demographic shift is unprecedented and likening it to an epidemic. She notes that traditional gender dysphoria primarily affected boys, but now teenage girls are the leading demographic, often influenced by social media and peer pressure. Shrier criticizes the affirmative care model adopted by major psychological associations, which she argues lacks medical judgment and oversight. She expresses concern that therapists are compelled to affirm a patient's self-diagnosis without thorough investigation. Shrier cites a significant increase in young women seeking gender transition, with statistics indicating a rise from 0.01% to 2% among high school students identifying as transgender. The conversation touches on the role of social media in shaping identity and the potential for psychological contagion among adolescents. Shrier argues that many girls are encouraged to falsify their narratives about gender dysphoria, complicating the diagnostic process. She also discusses the long-term risks associated with medical transition, including irreversible changes from testosterone and surgeries like double mastectomy, which she claims lack adequate medical oversight. Shrier emphasizes the need for scrutiny in medical practices surrounding gender transition, advocating for a more cautious approach to treatment. She reflects on the backlash she has faced for her views, asserting that the truth must be prioritized over ideological commitments. The interview concludes with a call for open discussion and critical examination of the current trends in gender identity treatment.

The episode invites listeners into a wide-ranging examination of gender-affirming care for children, anchored by Jillian Michaels and journalist Michael Shellenberger. The conversation juxtaposes competing views on whether such treatments are life-saving or potentially harmful, and it foregrounds concerns about long-term outcomes for minors. A central thread is the interrogation of how medical decisions for youth intersect with evolving cultural narratives, evidence quality, and the influence of powerful institutions, media, and pharmaceutical money. The hosts acknowledge their own biases, emphasize a judgment-free space, and stress the importance of seeking diverse perspectives to form informed opinions. A substantial portion of the dialogue centers on the WPATH files, the Cass Review, and the broader governance of gender medicine. They discuss how internal discussions within professional bodies can reveal tensions between activist perspectives and scientific caution, including worries about coercive or premature medicalization of vulnerable youths. The Cass Review’s conclusions—finding limited high-quality evidence that puberty blockers and related treatments reliably alleviate dysphoria in young people—are highlighted as a pivotal counterpoint to expansive medicalization narratives. The episode also delves into media dynamics, censorship, and the alleged capture of major outlets by political and commercial interests. The speakers recount episodes of deplatforming and suppression of dissenting viewpoints, the Aspen Institute’s role, and the broader shift toward paid subscription models as a means to preserve independent reporting. A recurring theme is that truth is not vested in a single source, but emerges from a mosaic of viewpoints, open debate, and transparent handling of data, even when that data is uncomfortable or controversial. Toward the end, the discussion returns to practical takeaways: how parents can navigate complex medical decisions for their children, the ethical implications of consent and long-term outcomes, and the importance of recognizing cognitive biases on all sides. They advocate for examining risk, prioritizing non-medical supports, and maintaining a culture where dissenting medical voices can be heard. The episode closes by pointing listeners to primary sources and encouraging personal research to form independent judgments rather than accepting prescribed narratives.

Megyn Kelly discusses the nomination of Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding his confirmation due to media scrutiny and potential opposition from Republican senators. Michael Knowles joins the conversation, expressing support for Hegseth and criticizing the media's attempts to undermine him with unsubstantiated allegations. They discuss the implications of Hegseth's past, including his marital history and accusations of alcohol use, arguing that these issues should not disqualify him from the position. The conversation shifts to the broader political landscape, with Knowles emphasizing the risks for Trump if Hegseth's nomination fails and the potential for other candidates like Ron DeSantis to face similar scrutiny. They note that the media's focus on personal histories could hinder the nomination process for various candidates, including Bobby Kennedy and Tulsi Gabbard. Kelly and Knowles also address the media's portrayal of Hegseth and the motivations behind the attacks, suggesting that personal biases and political agendas are at play. They argue that the standards being applied to Hegseth may not be consistent across the political spectrum, particularly when comparing him to other public figures with checkered pasts. The discussion then turns to the Supreme Court case regarding Tennessee's law banning puberty blockers and hormone treatments for minors. Kelly and Knowles express optimism about the outcome, citing the lack of evidence supporting the efficacy of such treatments and the potential risks involved. They highlight the importance of protecting children from irreversible medical decisions and criticize the ideological motivations behind the push for gender-affirming care. Attorney General Jonathan Sketti of Tennessee joins the conversation, discussing the implications of the Supreme Court's deliberations and the need for evidence-based medical practices. He emphasizes the risks associated with puberty blockers and hormone treatments, arguing that children are not equipped to make such significant decisions about their bodies. Sketti expresses hope that the court will uphold Tennessee's law, allowing states to regulate medical treatments for minors. The conversation concludes with a call to action, urging listeners to support efforts to protect children from harmful medical practices and to hold accountable those who promote ideologically driven policies without sufficient evidence.

Dr. Bowden recounts a career trajectory from academic settings to direct patient care, describing a shift in medicine toward centralized systems and outside influence from third parties. She explains choosing a cash-only, independent practice to serve her patients on her own terms, but notes that this independence made her a target for professional and public censure during the pandemic era. The conversation delves into her evolving views on vaccines, including a stark reversal from pre-COVID attitudes to concerns about safety standards, trial designs, and long-term effects. She cites anecdotal cases of prolonged symptoms and adverse events she associates with vaccination, contrasts those with the absence of robust testing to confirm causality, and asserts that spike protein dynamics could contribute to ongoing issues. The dialogue covers diagnostic challenges in medicine, the limitations of relying on tests over patient history, and the importance of clinicians listening to patients who report injuries or changes after vaccination. The discussion expands into the information ecosystem surrounding the pandemic, detailing allegations of coordinated messaging, suppression of alternative viewpoints, and the strategic use of media and policy to shape public perception. Bowden describes her own professional discipline and personal risk, including board investigations, public shaming, and legal threats, as part of a broader pattern she views as constraining physicians who question prevailing narratives. The guests explore accountability mechanisms, highlighting whistleblower cases and VAERS reporting as avenues for potential reform, while acknowledging the patchy nature of reimbursement and support for vaccine-injury claims. They also touch on practical considerations for individuals seeking care, emphasizing prevention, weight management, sleep, and vitamin D, alongside a cautious openness to treatments like ivermectin when guided by experienced clinicians. The conversation closes with reflections on trust, media literacy, and how listeners can engage with doctors who practice evidence-informed care while navigating a landscape of competing information and political energy.

Michael Shellenberger discusses the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) and the release of internal documents revealing troubling practices regarding gender dysphoria treatment. He argues that WPATH lacks evidence-based support for radical interventions like puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries. The documents show discussions about treating minors, including a 13-year-old with developmental delays, raising concerns about informed consent and the long-term consequences of such treatments. Shellenberger describes the situation as one of the greatest medical mistreatment scandals in history, comparable to lobotomies and the Tuskegee experiments. He emphasizes that many medical professionals involved seem to be aware of the lack of informed consent but continue their practices without questioning their validity. He criticizes the medical and psychological associations for their complicity, suggesting they prioritize ideology over patient welfare. He highlights the confusion between gender distress and broader emotional issues like anxiety and depression, arguing that many who express gender confusion may simply be experiencing identity crises. He points out that most children with gender dysphoria will likely identify as gay if left alone until adulthood. The conversation also touches on the societal implications of these practices, including the role of maternal instincts in decision-making and the potential for political and ideological manipulation. Shellenberger calls for accountability, suggesting that those who have transitioned minors should lose their licenses and face legal consequences. He notes recent shifts in public opinion, citing the UK's National Health Service's ban on puberty blockers, as a sign that awareness and resistance to these practices are growing. The discussion concludes with a call for a return to values that affirm human development and the importance of protecting children's rights to grow up without medical intervention.