reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The hosts, Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp, discuss the recent media coverage of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and drones, particularly criticizing a Wall Street Journal article and a 60 Minutes segment for inaccuracies. They assert that the FAA did not authorize the drones seen over New Jersey, contradicting claims made by the White House. The hosts emphasize that many high-level officials, including those from defense intelligence, believe the topic has been intentionally confused and discredited. They highlight the importance of the film "Age of Disclosure," which features credible voices advocating for transparency regarding UFOs. The hosts express frustration over the media's tendency to label these phenomena as drones, arguing that this misrepresents the reality of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs). They stress the need for accurate reporting and the significance of eyewitness testimonies, particularly regarding incidents involving Navy ships. The discussion underscores the ongoing challenges in addressing UFOs and the necessity for continued dialogue and investigation into these unidentified occurrences.

In this episode of Weaponized, hosts Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp discuss significant developments in the UFO and drone phenomena, particularly focusing on recent FAA drone bans in New Jersey and the implications for national security. They highlight the ongoing issue of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and the challenges faced by military bases in addressing drone incursions, noting that various countermeasures have failed. The conversation touches on the historical context of UAPs mimicking conventional aircraft, referencing Eric Davis's work on the Cash-Landrum case. The hosts express concerns about social engineering and the government's handling of UFO information, suggesting a pattern of plausible deniability that has persisted for decades. They introduce guests Ryan Robbins, Danny Silva, and Joe Murgia, who provide their perspectives on the year's developments. Key topics include the release of the jellyfish UAP footage, which sparked debate and skepticism, and the evolving role of the All-domain Resolution Office (AARO) under new leadership. The guests emphasize the mixed messages from officials regarding drone sightings and the perceived threats to national security. The discussion also covers the broader implications of drone sightings over sensitive sites, with guests noting that the public's awareness and concern are growing. They express skepticism about AARO's transparency and effectiveness, suggesting that whistleblowers may be at risk due to the agency's handling of information. As they look ahead to 2025, the group reflects on the potential for increased transparency and accountability in government regarding UFOs and drones. They emphasize the importance of continued public interest and advocacy for disclosure, while acknowledging the challenges posed by political dynamics and the stigma surrounding the topic. The episode concludes with a call to action for the UFO community to remain vigilant and engaged in the pursuit of truth.

James Fox and Jacques Vallee join Joe Rogan to discuss UFO phenomena, with Fox highlighting his documentary work and Vallee sharing his extensive research history. Vallee recounts a childhood UFO sighting that sparked his lifelong interest. He mentions his influence on Spielberg's "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," where he contributed ideas about how to depict the military's confusion regarding UFOs. The conversation shifts to the Roswell incident, with Fox detailing testimonies from military personnel who claim the debris was not of this Earth. Vallee emphasizes the need for a pattern in UFO sightings rather than relying on single cases, suggesting that many witnesses are reluctant to speak due to ridicule. He notes that credible sightings often come from trusted individuals in Silicon Valley. Fox recounts his journey into UFO research, sparked by a friend's story about Roswell, leading him to investigate further. They discuss the implications of sightings, including the military's response and the potential for advanced technology. Vallee mentions ongoing research into materials from UFO incidents, suggesting that some may have isotopic anomalies indicating advanced engineering. The discussion touches on the societal impact of UFO phenomena, with Vallee suggesting that these encounters may serve as a form of communication or teaching. They explore the idea that the phenomenon could be interdimensional rather than purely extraterrestrial. Fox shares insights from recent developments, including new photographs and videos of UFOs captured by Navy pilots, and the growing openness from government officials regarding UFOs. Vallee stresses the importance of scientific inquiry into these phenomena, advocating for transparency and collaboration between the military and scientific communities. The conversation concludes with reflections on the historical context of UFO sightings, the potential for future disclosures, and the need for a unified understanding of the phenomenon. They emphasize that the ongoing investigation into UFOs is not just about the objects themselves but also about the broader implications for humanity and our understanding of reality.

In this episode of Weaponized, hosts Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp discuss the significance of Commander David Fravor's testimony regarding the Tic Tac UFO incident, which occurred in 2004. Fravor, a key witness, emphasizes that the object exhibited capabilities beyond current technology, and he challenges recent claims by Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, head of the Pentagon's Arrow program, who stated that all cases, including Tic Tac, have been explained. Fravor asserts that the Tic Tac was observed by multiple trained aviators and sophisticated sensors, and its movements were impossible for known aircraft. Fravor recounts how his story gained traction over the years, starting from casual conversations to significant media attention, culminating in his testimony before Congress. He highlights the importance of the New York Times article from December 2017, which brought UFO investigations into the public eye and changed the stigma surrounding the topic. He notes that many pilots now feel more comfortable discussing their experiences due to the shift in perception. The discussion also touches on the technological implications of the Tic Tac incident, with Fravor expressing skepticism about explanations involving balloons or classified programs. He emphasizes that the capabilities of the Tic Tac far exceed anything the U.S. military possesses, both then and now. Fravor stresses the need for transparency regarding UFO encounters, particularly as they pose potential national security risks. The episode concludes with a reflection on the upcoming congressional hearing, where Fravor hopes further credible testimonies will shed light on the ongoing investigation into unidentified aerial phenomena. The hosts express optimism about the progress being made in understanding these incidents, despite the slow pace of change in public and governmental attitudes.

The hosts reflect on a year of notable progress in the UAP/UFO field, highlighting a shift toward serious witness testimony, official attention, and public discussion in 2025. They recount how 2025 featured a surge of whistleblowers coming forward, including individuals who testified before Congress and shared behind-the-scenes insights into congressional activity, hearings, and the strategic handling of sensitive information. They emphasize the role of media coverage in shaping the public narrative, noting how certain outlets amplified or challenged stories and how some pieces of footage and documentation finally reached broader audiences, sometimes through FOIA-driven releases and official acknowledgments. A recurring theme is the tension between transparency and national security, with the speakers describing careful vetting, due diligence, and the decision to release material in digestible portions to avoid misinterpretation or harm. The conversation revisits several high-profile releases, such as government-authenticated footage described as a large disc or sphere, and the later public discussion surrounding related videos and the witnesses who later appeared before Congress. They discuss the ongoing process of validating evidence, the challenges of decoding complex material, and the importance of corroborating eyewitness testimony with analyzable footage, while acknowledging the limits of public disclosure and the need to protect sources. The year also yielded reflections on the status of official institutions, including AARO, and critiques of how some mainstream media outlets treated the topic, sometimes mischaracterizing or downplaying evidence. The hosts look ahead to 2026 with predictions about continued testimony, potential new footage, and a renewed push to bring data to policymakers and the public. They anticipate more official scrutiny of reverse engineering claims, a possible expansion of investigations into underwater and other non-atmospheric phenomena, and a belief that high-profile releases or hearings could influence congressional action and public understanding. The tone remains measured and focused on ongoing investigation, cautious sharing of information, and the drive to keep challenging assumptions about what is known and what remains hidden.