TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In a divided and toxic political climate, Canada experienced a decline in its economy, national debt, and energy industry. Laws meant to protect citizens were exploited for government control, and promises were broken. Scandals tainted the integrity of leadership, leading to record inflation, a housing crisis, and soaring food costs. The inexperience of a school teacher and journalist in making economic decisions had crippling consequences. Citizens' hard-earned money was seized, innocent people were arrested, and freedoms were discarded. Divisive politics labeled peaceful Canadians as racists and homophobes. However, there is hope for change as a new government promises to prioritize the people and rebuild a united Canada.

Canadians may feel relief with Justin Trudeau's departure, but the Liberal MPs who supported his policies remain in power. They endorsed the inflationary carbon tax, excessive spending, and housing policies that doubled home costs, while also contributing to rising crime rates. Their sudden desire for change is not due to guilt over these issues, but rather a fear of losing their positions in the upcoming election. As the country faces a housing crisis, migrant challenges, and a significant deficit, the Liberals are preoccupied with internal power struggles. A carbon tax election is needed to choose between the costly NDP-Liberal coalition and common-sense conservatives who promise to cut taxes, control spending, and restore safety. The goal is to ensure every hardworking Canadian can afford a decent life in a united Canada.

I apologize to everyone here. However, our apology is not accepted by the speaker. They are tired of liberal apologies and believe they hold no value. They mention an ethics violation in February and another one now. They criticize our pride on the first day and claim that Justin Trudeau's actions prove we cannot be nonpartisan. They suggest that if we have any integrity, we should step down.

The speaker criticizes the leader of the opposition for suggesting that everything was perfect under the previous conservative government and wanting to make Canada great again. Canadians do not share this nostalgia. The speaker highlights the leader's past as part of Stephen Harper's failed housing minister, where he violated the rights of indigenous peoples, ignored environmental responsibilities, and lacked a plan for the future.

Last year's press gallery dinner had a Star Wars theme, but this year, with Halloween approaching, they decided against it. The past couple of years have been tough, with many events being canceled. However, things started picking up again after people got vaccinated. Winterlude was particularly enjoyable, featuring a hot tub. The conservative party supported the Ottawa occupation, while the liberals saw it as an opportunity to overthrow the government. The new leader of the official opposition, Pierre, couldn't make it to the dinner, but he sent his apologies. The speaker also touched on various topics, including inflation, his own experiences, and the importance of journalism. He paid tribute to fallen members of the Canadian Armed Forces and thanked all Canadians in uniform for their service.

The speaker criticizes the leader of the opposition, stating that he believes everything was perfect under the previous conservative government and wants to make Canada great again. However, the speaker argues that Canadians do not share this sentiment. They highlight the leader's past actions as part of Stephen Harper's failed housing minister, including violating the rights of indigenous peoples and neglecting environmental responsibilities. The speaker also mentions the lack of a future environmental and economic plan.

Trudeau has hired Supriya Dwivedi, who is known for her outspoken and controversial language. The speaker expresses frustration and a lack of credibility in their own opinions. They emphasize the need to take things seriously and not be ignorant. The speaker also criticizes themselves and others for making mistakes and not progressing. They question why Trudeau hired someone with such vulgar language.

Canadians are struggling with high gas prices and housing costs under Justin Trudeau's leadership. The speaker questions how people are surviving economically, mentioning the high cost of gas and housing. They express frustration with Trudeau's spending on foreign countries and propose that money should be invested in Canada instead. The speaker, fortunate due to their business success, considers leaving Canada if Trudeau is re-elected. They criticize Trudeau's plan to increase the carbon tax, referring to it as an "air tax." The speaker asks viewers to share how they are coping and what they desire in the next prime minister.

The speaker discusses the government's spending of $8 million on searching for unmarked graves at a school in Kamloops, BC, with no results. They criticize the wasteful spending and highlight the financial struggles of Canadians. The speaker expresses frustration at consistently being proven right about issues years before they are acknowledged, leading to backlash and cancelation. They predict being vindicated in the future.

The speaker describes meeting people across the country, distinguishing between those who can leave if they don't win and those who cannot. The speaker worries about the latter, exemplified by a waitress working multiple jobs who lost her car and had to return to a part-time job. The speaker claims her taxes and heating bills went up, but her wages did not. The speaker also mentions a man with three jobs who cannot afford a home and feels ashamed when his children ask why he is never around. The speaker says this man has been robbed of the promise of Canada: that hard work leads to a good life, including a house with a yard. The speaker asserts this promise belongs to everyone, and their purpose is to restore it, ensuring safety, fair wages, affordable living, and a government that serves the people. The speaker concludes that their focus is on the daily struggles of working Canadians.

Our government called those who supported others cold, cruel, and small. We need to engage with all Canadians, as voting differently doesn't mean you don't care about Canada. We must reflect on these lessons and stay true to our Liberal values.

The speaker connects Justin Trudeau, Russell Williams, and the Picton Farms, suggesting a conspiracy involving unalivings and donations. They call for a deeper investigation by the RCMP. Another speaker demands Trudeau explain the Canadian flag situation. A third speaker discusses a United Nations peacekeeping helmet's capabilities. Lastly, a speaker emphasizes the importance of vaccination for travel safety.

The speaker is asked about their populist strategy and their use of strong ideological language. They deny talking about left or right but mention that many people believe in it. The interviewer suggests that the speaker is taking a page out of Donald Trump's book, but the speaker questions who would say that. The interviewer asks why Canadians should trust the speaker with their vote, and the speaker responds by emphasizing the need for common sense in the government. They criticize the current government's handling of the economy and promise to cap spending, cut waste, and balance the budget to bring down inflation and interest rates. They claim to have a common sense plan to improve the buying power of Canadians' paychecks.

Mark Harney allegedly advised the liberal government to enact the Emergencies Act on protesters in Ottawa. According to the speaker, Harney advised Trudeau for a very long time. The speaker claims the Act was deemed unconstitutional and unreasonable, violating the Charter of Rights. The speaker says the government is appealing the decision. The speaker believes the protesters occupying Ottawa are not patriots but are inciting anarchy and should face consequences. Anyone funding the convoy is funding sedition. Foreign funders interfered in domestic affairs and should be punished. The speaker insists foreign governments involved should be exposed.

According to Speaker 0, Mr. Polyev stated he would not reflexively oppose the government, but support it when in the country's best interest, because he wants the country to succeed. However, he then spent fifteen minutes attacking ministers like Sean Fraser and Stephen Guildeaux for ruining the country. Speaker 1 noted Mr. Polyev's approach suggests he won the election, not lost it. He will only be able to stand in defense of Canadians because of the Prime Minister's goodwill in calling an early by-election for him in Alberta, costing close to $2,000,000. Speaker 1 found it interesting that Mr. Polyev is going after Stephen Gabbeau, blaming Sean Frazier for the housing crisis, and wanting to fight the same political battles from the last campaign.

The speaker claims the Liberal Party won due to weaponizing fear and exploiting "Trump derangement syndrome" among Canadians, while the Conservative Party's strategy failed because Pierre Poilievre "went soft." A key factor was Poilievre losing his own riding due to a 2023 redistribution, which the speaker blames on national campaign manager Jenny Byrne. The speaker alleges Conservative HQ micromanaged campaigns nationwide, blocking candidates from debates and local events, and even rigging nomination races to install controllable "red Tory loyalists." They claim HQ staff showed conflicts of interest by getting family members into elite internships. According to the speaker, the election hinged on local races, but grassroots campaigns were sabotaged from the top. The speaker advises Poilievre to fire everyone at Conservative HQ and find a safe seat by having a retiring MP step aside. Despite the demoralizing loss, the speaker urges conservatives not to quit.

Speaker 0 states this is the most important election in most of their lifetimes. They claim Trump has made unacceptable threats against the economy, workers, and sovereignty. They believe a particular leader can address these issues and needs support. Speaker 1 accuses Catherine McKenna of losing track of 20,000 contracts worth $236,000,000,000, which they claim is why she is no longer in parliament. Speaker 1 repeats the accusation and insults Speaker 0. Speaker 1 continues to harass Catherine, repeating the $236,000,000,000 figure and using abusive language. Speaker 1 then states that everyone is "fucking retarded."

The speaker is asked about their strategy and is accused of using populist tactics. They deny talking about left or right and being influenced by Donald Trump. The questioner asks why Canadians should trust them with their vote, but the speaker doesn't understand the question. They then explain their plan to bring common sense back to the country by capping spending, cutting waste, balancing the budget, and reducing inflation and interest rates. They claim to be the only one with a plan to improve the buying power of Canadians' paychecks.

Speaker 0: Good morning. It's going to be a nice day. I'll keep this short. This message is for the police of Ottawa. You should resign. You are an embarrassment to law enforcement. Treating truckers like terrorists is wrong. I've witnessed people shoveling sidewalks, roads, and helping the homeless. The convoy has done more for the homeless than the mayor. They offer blankets, food, and friendship. They care about their country and are tired of the prime minister and premier. So, with respect, step down and make way for change.

Canada is described as America's "attic" and proposed as the 51st state, becoming a "colder Florida." The speaker claims Canada's free healthcare involves long waits, calling it "tooth prison," and promises faster, "American style" dentists. The speaker criticizes Canada's money with animals, offering "good old fashioned green cash" with dead presidents. Canada's Prime Minister is compared to a drama teacher running a Whole Foods, lacking power, while America has "real leaders" with "big energy." The speaker suggests Canada already has American TV, food, and slang. The proposal involves signing paperwork, swapping the flag, and keeping Tim Hortons for Canada.

Many Canadians want a federal election this year instead of waiting until 2025. In Alberta, there is a desire for an immediate change in the environment minister, Stephen Gebow. The speaker has good relationships with some federal ministers, including Chrystia Freeland, whom they consider a champion for their province.

We will govern responsibly and work with politicians from all sides of the house. Where there is constructive criticism of our agenda with responsible alternative policies, we will listen. That means we are also looking to the opposition to conduct its itself responsibly. I am under no illusions about what we face with the conservatives under the leadership of Pierre Pauliev. In the last parliament, mister Pauliev's approach was far from responsible. In fact, he shut down parliament for weeks on end last fall, as I'm sure you all remember. He thought and hopefully no longer thinks a bad day for the government was a good day for the opposition, but this is not how this country runs. We need more good days for parliament. And increasingly, Canadians are of the view that a good day for parliament is when parties work together.

Look for a few minutes at the Liberal Hall Of Shame for 2015 to 02/2021. Liberal MP William Amos was caught twice on house Zoom proceedings in indecent positions. Liberal MP Yasmin Rathansi was wrongfully employing her sister with taxpayers' dollars and deliberately hiding this information from Canadians. Liberal MP Ramesh Sengha was removed from the Liberal Caucus in January 2021 after he accused multiple other Liberal MPs of supporting the calisthenia movement. Liberal MP Darshan Singh Kang had to leave the Liberal Caucus in 2015 over accusations of sexual harassment. Liberal MP Nikola Di Laurio didn't show up for work for a year after he announced his resignation in 02/2018. Then the public found out, oh, he actually didn't resign. He still collected his salary as an MP even if he was working full time in a law firm in Montreal. To this today to this day, this situation has never been clearly explained by Trudeau and the Liberals. Liberal MP Raj Greywall admitted he racked up millions of dollars in debts, paying casino blackjack, and ended up resigning from the Liberal caucus in 2018 after the news came to light. Following an RCMP investigation. But after suddenly announcing he had paid off his 7 figure debts, he stayed on as a member of parliament for the rest of the parliamentary session. You may recall that mister Graywald was already under investigation by the federal ethics commissioner at the time and was later found guilty of being in violation of conflict of interest. Then there was a liberal MP Marwin Tabarro. He was allowed to run against again for the liberal party in February even though detailed allegations of sexual harassment had been made against him. After being arrested in April 2020, he remained in caucus for almost two months because the prime minister's office claimed they knew nothing about it, took a newspaper article for the liberals to kick him out of caucus. Then former Liberal MP Frank Bayless signed one of those juicy sole source contracts with the Liberal government during the COVID epidemic. He received $237,000,000. Public health agency figures disclosed that more than 90% of the 10,000 Bayless Medical Company ventilators it bought were never used in any clinic or any hospital. Sadly, these ethical lapses were even worse amongst cabinet ministers. Let me give you a few examples. Anita Anad's husband was the recipient of one of those juicy COVID contracts. LifeLabs received tens of millions of dollars of COVID contracts. They sell test kits. Anita Anad's husband, John Knowlton, is a director of LifeLabs. The LifeLabs division has received multiple contracts worth millions since Anad was elected to the parliament in 2019. Navdeep Baines was industry minister and, as such, promised to crack down on big telcos who overcharge Canadians for Internet and cell phone service. Guess what? He found a job at Rogers after leaving the government. The lobbying commissioner said she was frustrated at this, but liberals will always find loopholes that means more money for them. Then there was Bill Blair, on several occasions, lied, meddled into the work of the RCMP regarding the worst mass killing in the history of Canada in Porta Peak, Nova Scotia. While he was the president of the Treasury Board, Scott Bryson tried to block approval for the contract of a navy supply ship being built at the navy shipyard in Quebec because he was lobbied to do so by New Brunswick's powerful Irving family, owners of the rival Halifax shipyard. Minister Bryson also tried to argue there was no need for him to set up a conflict of interest screen to prevent him from participating in government decisions involving two of Atlantic Canada's wealthiest families, even though he used to chair one of their investment firms and that his spouse continued to sit on the company's board of directors. Francois Philippe Champagne owned two apartments in London, England worth millions of dollars. His mortgages were with a Chinese bank. Strange indeed for a Canadian in The UK, Canadian MP in The UK to have to go to a Chinese bank for a mortgage. Judy Foote got involved in the Frank Norman affair. I will talk about that in a bit. But what is interesting here is that she resigned for health reasons. But suddenly, her health improved, and she was rewarded with the job of lieutenant governor in Lupinland and Labrador. Steven Gebel forgot to pay his taxes, but he never forgot to travel, especially to China. This minister is running around the globe, busy lecturing Canadians, but patting Chinese or Gulf Emirates officials on the back. Catherine McKenna and John Wilkinson, his predecessors, and environment were of the same ilk, jetting around the world to lecture the common folks that they should bicycle to work. Foreign affairs minister Melanie Jolie's office staff didn't read an email that said her department was sending a representative to a Russian embassy party. So we had a representative at a party drinking vodka with the Russian officials just after Putin invaded Ukraine. Not reading their emails is a hallmark of Trudeau ministers and their staff. It was the excuse given by Bill Blair and Marco Mendocino and, of course, Justin Trudeau. When David LaMetti was turfed from cabinet, a lot of people wondered why. He had actually, after all, done much of Trudeau's bidding, we thought. Well, in the last few weeks, we learned that LaMetti canceled a verdict of first degree murder against Jacques Delisle, a former judge, even if all the experts were against this decision. Lemetti and the government refused to come clean on why he did that, even though Delisle later pleaded guilty to manslaughter. You all heard senators' nonanswers to our questions on this issue. What about Dominique Leblanc, who, despite despite connection to the powerful Irving family, was appointed to be minister of fisheries, oceans, and the Canadian Coast Guard. He had to consult with the Essex commissioner for weeks in order to figure out how to stick handle around this very obvious conflict of interest. Then there was a time when minister LeBlanc flew from Moncton to Montreal and back aboard a jet owned by JD Irving Limited. Nothing to see here, folks. But when the ethics commissioner, Mario Dion, found minister LeBlanc guilty of breaking a conflict of interest act because he awarded a lucrative Arctic surf clam license to a company linked to his wife's cousin. He couldn't wiggle out of that. Speaking of Dominique Leblanc and Scott Bryson, we still don't know what their exact role was in the vice admiral Norman affair. The Liberals tried to renege on a contract for a supply ship in order to give it back to the Irvings. When they got caught, they decided they would get the height ahead of vice admiral Norman. The prime minister even sent him to trial before the police had investigated its investigation. Scott Bryson and Judy Foote left their positions, and taxpayers ended up being invoiced for an undisclosed sum of money paid out to vice admiral Norman. That is a first class cover up. Marco Mendocino's case was hopeless. Conflicts of interest, emails not read, bold lies in public, pure incompetence. When you are so bad that even Justin Trudeau thinks you're bad, you've hit the bottom. Someday, I will have a speech just on Marco Mendocino's scandals. I may need my unlimited time for that. It happens that ministers organize fundraisers outside their writings, but when you represent a downtown Montreal riding, this is strange. It is even stranger if this fundraiser happens to be in New York. New York, USA. To my knowledge, that is the first, and this honor belongs to Mark Miller. Mary Anne Monsoff had to admit that she was actually not born in Afghanistan, as she had told people and led people to believe for years. Bill Morneau is another minister who was scandal prone. He started his political career with violating the Elections Act, for which he was fined. This is, after all, the same finance minister who forgot that he had and forgot to declare his villa in France in his ethics reporting. This is the same finance minister who sponsored Bill C27, which happened to increase the value of pensions sold by the minister's own company, Morneau Shepell. When the bill was tabled in the House of Commons, the value of Morneau Shepell shares joked, and minister Morneau just happened to still be holding $21,000,000 worth of shares. And as I already mentioned, his role in the We Charity scandal, when he quit, he pretended he was going to the OECD top position. No one knows for sure if this was true. One thing is true, and it's real. Taxpayers footed the bill for his failed campaign. I still have an order paper question on the true cost. Still unanswered after twenty five months, it was reported in the media that this phony campaign cost at least $11,000,000. Mary Ang was found guilty by the ethics commissioner for giving contracts to her best friend. In a Trudeau government, that means you pretend to be sorry, and that has no consequences. How about Seamus O'Regan? The government spent $180,000 defending him in a defamation suit. And do you remember Hunter Tootoo? He had to leave cabinet to deal with, sadly, addiction issues. But what was strange was when he said that Justin Trudeau had hugged him after he revealed that he had an inappropriate relationship with a staff member. Harjit Sajid was found to have lied about his role in Afghanistan. But this happy bunch knows how to organize a party sorry, a cabinet retreat. The three affordability retreats held in Charlottetown, Vancouver, and Hamilton between 2022 and August 2023 cost 1,325,000. Hey, life is better with lobster and white wine, especially when you are discussing affordability. It's not surprising to see all those ethical lapses. After all, this is the leader of an organization who sets the tone. Justin Trudeau does not believe the rules of ethics apply to him. So how could he insist that his officials, his MPs, and his ministers be any better? In 02/2015, we learned that Justin Trudeau was billing charities for speaking engagements, even as an MP. This was a First Colleagues, a sitting politician who charges people to hear him speak. When he got caught, he said he was sorry and wrote a check. A few weeks later, he was caught again. He had charged the House of Commons for expenses that had also been reimbursed by the organizations to which he spoke. Again, we had the, I'm sorry, here's a check routine. This was a preview of things to come. Who can forget the thank you for your donation comment and incident where the PM's elitist and condescending attitude was on full display when he jeered at an indigenous protester before that? Before that, we had Elbowgate when Justin Trudeau pushed aside fellow MP Ruth Ellen Brasso Brasso because he was in a hurry to vote. His time was more precious than others, and pushing aside women who get in the way is something our fake feminist prime minister does without hesitation. That was in line with Justin Trudeau's behavior in the Kokanee grope incident where he groped a female journalist. Then he said, oh my, I would not have done this had I known that the woman was a national reporter. I guess in his mind, it's more acceptable to grope a person that is not a national reporter than one that is. Now we all remember, of course, that our prime minister decided that this was indeed a lesson, not just for him, but for all of us. We all know that some people experience things differently, he said. Now let's not forget the three, four, five, maybe more incidents where Justin Trudeau wore blackface because he thought it was funny to pretend that he was black. We don't know how many times he did that because he can't re

The speaker asks questions about pregnancy outcomes and the Liberal government platform. They discuss the CBC's income sources, suspecting hidden government funding. The conversation also touches on pharmaceutical advertising differences between Canada and the US. The speaker criticizes CBC reporters for not covering the National Citizens Inquiry, suggesting they are avoiding facing the truth.