TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks about President Biden's conflicts of interest regarding sanctions on individuals who have done business with his family. They mention a report alleging that the First Son's company received $3,500,000 from a Russian woman. The speaker questions how Biden is navigating these conflicts and asks for an explanation of the $3,500,000. The other speaker responds by saying they have no confirmation of the report's accuracy and no further details. When asked about conflicts of interest, the speaker questions what those conflicts would be and points out that Biden has sanctioned more oligarchs than before, suggesting it is not a conflict of interest.

My son has not made money. The House Oversight Committee found checks totaling $240,000 in Joe Biden's account from Hunter's dealings with a Chinese energy company. Hunter sent messages demanding payment, leading to $5,000,000 wired to a joint venture. Money then moved to Hunter's company, his uncle James, and finally Joe Biden. The White House denies Joe's involvement, but questions remain. More bank records are expected.

Hunter Biden formed a Chinese private equity fund and raised money from Chinese investors after a trip to Beijing with his father, then Vice President Joe Biden. Hunter had dinner with business associates from Ukraine, Russia, and Kazakhstan, and a Burisma executive thanked him for introducing him to his father. Hunter often gave 50% of his earnings to his dad. There were texts mentioning "the big guy," which Hunter confirmed referred to Joe Biden. Chinese executives admitted that Hunter introduced them to the vice president. Hunter also had business dealings in Mexico and his legal fees were covered by his father. There were photos of Joe Biden golfing with Hunter and a member of the Burisma board, who had a one-on-one meeting with Joe Biden before joining the board. Hunter had multiple visits to the White House and met with Joe Biden. Joe Biden claimed he never discussed business with his family.

Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of discrediting herself by focusing on trivial matters concerning Biden, such as his ice cream preference, instead of investigating Hunter Biden's alleged financial dealings with foreign entities. Speaker 1 claims Hunter Biden received millions from Moscow and significant payments from an energy company despite lacking relevant experience. Speaker 0 states that the Hunter Biden laptop story originated from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani and cannot be verified. Speaker 1 insists the laptop's existence is known and that it's crucial to investigate potential corruption involving Biden and foreign money from China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 also alleges Biden's brother profited in Iraq without prior experience. Speaker 1 asserts this is a major scandal that Speaker 0 is ignoring. Speaker 0 reiterates the laptop cannot be verified.

House oversight claims to have bank records indicating that a Chinese energy company paid three members of the Biden family through a third party. The purpose of these payments is unclear. The speaker refuses to comment on the matter, citing the history of inaccuracies and lies from House Republicans on this issue.

Joe Biden has denied involvement in his family's business deals, but witnesses claim otherwise. They believe he lied about interacting with Hunter Biden's associates and is the closer for their business dealings with foreign interests. The speaker challenges the left to prove otherwise before yielding the floor.

The speaker discusses allegations of payments made by an undisclosed country to the Biden family. They mention that the family created shell companies while Joe Biden was vice president to profit from his position. The speaker questions if Biden's compromised position affects his decision-making as president. They claim to have evidence of $10 million received by the family and suggest it could be between $15 and $30 million in total. The speaker highlights that the countries involved, including China, are not reputable and even major companies avoid doing business with them. They emphasize the need for Biden to explain why his family received money. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of media coverage and promises to continue investigating and revealing the truth to the American people.

President Biden's denial of discussing business with Hunter Biden's associates is called a lie by the speaker. The speaker claims that Joe Biden's 40-year career in Washington, DC is the Biden family business. The speaker presents evidence of James Biden receiving a loan based on his political connections, and then transferring money to Joe Biden. The speaker also mentions an email referring to Joe Biden as the "big guy" in a joint venture. The speaker accuses Hunter Biden of not registering as a foreign agent despite his work with a Chinese energy company. The speaker calls for an impeachment investigation into Joe Biden's alleged corruption and pay-for-play tactics.

Hunter Biden engaged in lucrative business dealings in China, Ukraine, Russia, and Kazakhstan, often sharing his earnings with his father, Joe Biden. Emails and texts suggest that Hunter used his father's influence to benefit his business ventures. Chinese executives admitted to being introduced to Joe Biden by Hunter. Hunter also had business dealings in Mexico, with Joe Biden even flying on Air Force 2 with Hunter and his business partner. Joe Biden agreed to cover Hunter's legal fees for his dealings with a Chinese company. There is photographic evidence of Joe Biden golfing with Hunter and another member of the Burisma board. Hunter's business partner had a one-on-one meeting with Joe Biden in the White House before joining Burisma. Hunter's business partner made multiple visits to the White House and had a meeting with Joe Biden. Joe Biden denies discussing business matters with his family.

Speaker 1 denies ever discussing his son's overseas business dealings and claims to have never discussed anything related to Ukraine. He also states that he has never discussed his own business or his children's business. Speaker 1 dismisses claims that he was on speaker phone discussing business matters and points out that he was aware of his son's business but never talked about it. Speaker 2 admits to having shell companies that collected money through tax fraud, and compares it to what he sees happening with Biden. Speaker 1 emphasizes that there is no evidence to support any wrongdoing.

The speaker was asked about polling data that suggests a majority of Americans, including some Democrats, believe they acted illegally or unethically regarding their family's business interests. The speaker refused to comment and denied any interaction with their son and brother's foreign business associates, calling it a bunch of lies.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of discrediting themselves by avoiding questions about Biden's son and alleged corruption. Speaker 1 questions the validity of the Hunter Biden laptop story, sourced from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani. Speaker 0 insists it's a crucial issue to investigate Biden's alleged corruption involving China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 argues the story lacks verification. Speaker 0 counters by pointing out the laptop's existence and the Biden family's response. The conversation escalates as Speaker 0 emphasizes the significance of the scandal and Speaker 1 questions its validity.

The president's statements contradict the fact that he has spoken to Hunter Biden's business associates. However, Speaker 1 argues that the president never claimed to have never spoken to anyone. He simply stated that he had no involvement in Hunter Biden's business dealings. Speaker 1 finds it unreasonable to expect a father not to greet people his son is dining with. This is the only evidence presented. Additionally, it is mentioned that Hunter Biden used this as a party trick to impress others.

Speaker 0 asks Biden about the allegations of illegal or unethical behavior regarding his family's business interests in Ukraine and China. Speaker 1 denies the claims, calling them lies. Speaker 0 mentions the lawsuits, but Speaker 1 again denies any interaction.

Hunter Biden's involvement with a Ukrainian energy company while his father, Joe Biden, was Vice President is questioned. Joe Biden claims he didn't know what his son was doing and only found out after he joined the board. He trusts his son and sees no reason to investigate further. The interviewer suggests that as Vice President, Joe Biden should have been more aware of his family's activities, but Joe Biden dismisses the idea. He deflects by mentioning the issues surrounding Trump's family. Joe Biden believes there is no evidence to suggest any wrongdoing on his son's part.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of selling access to the president through his son's job at a gas company. Speaker 1 denies the claim and challenges Speaker 0 to do physical activities together. Speaker 1 defends his son, stating that no one has accused him of wrongdoing. Speaker 0 mentions hearing the accusation on MSNBC, but Speaker 1 disputes this. Speaker 1 criticizes Speaker 0's lack of backbone. Speaker 2 comments on Speaker 1's defensive and angry response, claiming that it reveals the real Joe Biden. Speaker 2 asserts that Joe Biden sent his son to peddle influence overseas, and when confronted, Joe Biden denies it, claiming that the mainstream media has not reported it.

President Biden denies discussing business matters with his son or family members. He claims to have never spoken to his son about it and avoids any knowledge or involvement in their business dealings. When asked if he stands by his statement of not discussing his son's overseas affairs, he affirms his stance.

Hunter Biden, the son of former vice president Joe Biden, is at the center of a political controversy. President Trump claims he is hiding, but Hunter says he is in plain sight. There are allegations of public corruption involving Joe Biden and his son's involvement with Burisma. The Biden administration denies any wrongdoing, stating that Joe Biden had no involvement in his family's foreign business deals. Rudy Giuliani and Andrei Derkotch are mentioned as key players in dealing with Ukraine. The transcript ends with a statement that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing.

Vice President denies ever discussing his son's overseas business dealings, emphasizing a clear separation between personal and government matters. He stands by his statement and claims to have been unaware of his son's involvement in a particular company. The Vice President asserts that he has never discussed his own business or his children's business, specifically mentioning Ukraine.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about his son's involvement in a Ukrainian energy company facing corruption charges. Speaker 1 claims to have no knowledge of his son's activities and trusts him. Speaker 0 questions the lack of accountability, but Speaker 1 deflects by mentioning Trump's family. Speaker 1 denies any wrongdoing and states that there is no evidence against his son. When asked about guardrails if elected, Speaker 1 asserts that his relatives will not engage in foreign business due to the current administration's controversies. No foreign business dealings will occur.

Speaker 0 asks if Joe Biden received payments from Burisma or any other foreign companies while he was vice president, president, or a private citizen. Speaker 1 mentions an ongoing investigation led by the US attorney in Delaware, appointed by President Trump. Speaker 1 suggests referring to the US attorney for any information that can be shared. Speaker 0 then asks if the president is under investigation, to which Speaker 1 refuses to confirm or deny, following department policy. The conversation ends without a clear answer regarding Biden's involvement with foreign payments or the president's investigation.

Speaker 1 states that the Biden family engaged in influence peddling, resulting in tens of millions of dollars. He claims his legitimate businesses became illegitimate through alignment with Hunter Biden, which involved selling the "Biden name." Speaker 1 alleges that Joe Biden was aware and involved, citing his participation in at least two business phone calls. He asserts that Joe Biden's claim of never discussing foreign business deals with his son or brother is a lie, supported by documents and evidence. Speaker 1 further alleges that Joe Biden negotiated with the Chinese Communist Party on a golf course to secure a board seat and receive money from the Chinese. He references a WhatsApp message and a billion dollars in Ukraine, conditioned on removing a prosecutor investigating Hunter.

President Biden's son, Hunter, had business dealings with associates from Ukraine, Russia, and Kazakhstan. Hunter's emails suggest he shared earnings with his father. Hunter also formed a Chinese fund after a trip with his father to Beijing. Emails mention a "big guy," believed to be Joe Biden. Hunter visited the White House frequently and had meetings with his father. Photos show Joe Biden golfing with Hunter and a business partner who also met with Biden in the White House.

Joe Biden's son, Hunter, received $40,000 from China, contradicting Joe's previous claim that his son didn't make money there. Hunter extorted money from an associate, using his father's influence. The Biden family engaged in complex financial transactions to hide the Chinese money's source. A Chinese company wired $5 million to a joint venture involving Hunter, who then sent $400,000 to his own company. From there, $50,000 in cash was withdrawn and deposited into James and Sarah Biden's personal account. Sarah later wrote a $40,000 check to Joe, labeled as a loan repayment. This shows how Joe benefited from his family's dealings with China, potentially compromising America's interests. The House Oversight Committee will investigate further.

Joe received $3,500,000 from Russia through Putin, who had a connection with the former mayor of Moscow. Joe's family also received the same amount. Speaker 1 denies receiving any money from foreign sources, including China, and claims that his son is the only one who made money from China. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about the money he received, but Speaker 1 denies any wrongdoing in Ukraine, stating that investigations found no basis for such claims.