TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

FBI Special Agent Elvis Chan informed Twitter and other social media platforms about a potential hack and leak operation before the 2020 presidential election, despite having no evidence. The government had possession of Hunter Biden's laptop for a year and pre-bunked the story that eventually came out. The Aspen Institute held a tabletop exercise to prepare for a story about Hunter Biden and Burisma, with journalists and big tech executives present. The exercise aimed to discount and censor the story. Fifty-one former intelligence officials signed a letter claiming the laptop story was Russian disinformation, with the intention of helping Joe Biden win the election. This coordinated effort to suppress information is concerning and undermines democracy.

Since its inception in 1947, the CIA has been legally mandated to avoid domestic interference, particularly in partisan politics. A recent letter reveals that Gina Haspel and her team violated this mandate by adding signatories to a letter containing false information, orchestrated by Mike Morell at the request of Tony Blinken, who was then a senior aide to Biden's campaign. This was aimed at countering the narrative surrounding Hunter Biden's laptop. The timeline is crucial, as within four days in October, they gathered 51 signatories and received CIA approval to publish the letter. Candidate Biden later used this in a debate, claiming that the intelligence community supported the idea that his son's laptop was Russian disinformation. This constitutes election rigging, warranting subpoenas for Haspel, her leadership team, and those involved in the email chain.

The transcript alleges that 51 former intelligence officials, including active CIA contractors, colluded with the Biden campaign to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation and rig the 2020 election. According to the transcript, Anthony Blinken initiated the effort by contacting Michael Morell, a CIA contractor, to create talking points for Biden. The report claims that CIA officials, including then-Director Gina Haspel, were aware of the statement prior to its publication and that the CIA's internal review board approved it. The transcript asserts that Morell and David Buckley, another signatory, were active CIA contractors at the time, earning taxpayer money while engaging in political activities. The report suggests that the signatories leveraged their intelligence titles to lend legitimacy to their claims. The speaker concludes that the CIA paid, housed, and approved the letter, interfering in the electoral system.

Mike Morell, former CIA director, emailed John Brennan, Obama's CIA director, just before a debate between Trump and Biden regarding the Hunter Biden laptop. Morell asked Brennan to sign a letter because he was, quote, "trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue." The letter in question is the one from 51 intelligence professionals that claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. Morell, according to the speaker, knew he wasn't creating an intelligence product, but rather a political moment. The speaker claims this email is proof that the letter was a political dirty trick coordinated with the Biden campaign.

The former acting CIA director coordinated with the Biden campaign to release a letter from 51 intelligence analysts, which has since been disproven. It has now been revealed that some of the signatories were active CIA contractors at the time. The Trump CIA leadership knew about the letter beforehand but did not intervene. This information is currently being reported on justinews.com.

In October 2020, with Joe Biden "in trouble" regarding his laptop, Anthony Blinken, Biden's campaign aide, allegedly told Michael Morrell to "round them up." Subsequently, 51 intelligence authorities swore the laptop had "all the hallmarks of Russian information." During the debate, when Trump attacked Biden about the laptop, Biden responded that 51 intelligence authorities swore it was a product of Russian espionage. A poll later indicated that if people had known the laptop was authenticated, it would have changed their vote. The laptop was in the FBI's possession and deemed authentic, but Christopher Wray's FBI was partnering with Twitter and Facebook to suppress the story.

Last night, it was revealed that Tony Blinken played a significant role in orchestrating a plan involving 51 intelligence operatives. Their objective was to discredit a laptop that is widely known to be genuine. All evidence points to Blinken as the mastermind behind this scheme. It is crucial that he is questioned and held accountable for his actions.

Former CIA director Mike Murrell's email to John Brennan, another former CIA director, has been obtained by Justine News. The email reveals Murrell's intention to create a political moment during the presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Murrell wanted Brennan to sign a letter, which was signed by 51 intelligence professionals, to counter Trump's claims about Hunter Biden's laptop being Russian disinformation. This email suggests that the letter was not an intelligence product but rather a coordinated political dirty trick. The authenticity of the email is significant and raises questions about the letter's credibility.

In a 4-hour interview, Jesse confirms that the laptop issue was politically motivated. Tony Blinken contacts Mike Morell to discuss the laptop, and later sends him a USA Today article. This article is included in a letter signed by John Brennan, Mike Morell, and 49 other former intelligence officials, who use their titles. They are not signing as private citizens, but as former directors of the CIA. This raises concerns about the actions of public servants.

On JFK’s inauguration day, 48% of all State Department political-section employees were not actually State Department employees at all; they were CIA operatives under diplomatic cover. While parked at a US embassy, they did not answer within the State Department chain of command and acted as covert operatives for organized political warfare conducted by the CIA. Because they dominated the political section, they could set their own political policy for the country. If the State Department did not want to overthrow a regime but the CIA did, the CIA could use the embassy’s political-section bandwidth to contact dissident groups, run money to them, provide logistical support, connect them, and run a parallel operation without observing the White House National Security Council chain of command. The speaker gave examples where in some embassies 80% of the political affairs staff were CIA, not State Department at all. The speaker then notes Joe Biden’s CIA director as Bill Burns, describing Burns as a buddy of Jeffrey Epstein. It is asserted that in the 1990s Burns was the head of the political section for the US embassy in Russia, and that Burns “never worked a day at the CIA in his whole life before he’d be handed the reins to be the CIA director.” The speaker emphasizes that Burns was a State Department figure the whole time, serving as the head of the political affairs section, and questions where he was positioned “at state” when he was the head of the political affairs section.

Pam Bondi and the Trump DOJ are investigating James Comey and John Brennan's careers as FBI and CIA directors. Brennan, a proponent of waterboarding under Bush, shifted his stance to join the Obama administration. He allegedly lied to Congress about civilian deaths from Obama's targeted assassination program and about the CIA hacking Senate staffers' computers. In October 2020, 51 intelligence authorities claimed the Hunter Biden laptop had "hallmarks of Russian information," influencing a presidential debate exchange between Trump and Biden. A poll suggested this may have swayed the election. The FBI, under Christopher Wray, allegedly suppressed the authentic laptop story. Brennan accused Trump of treason after Trump's Helsinki remarks. It's argued that Brennan was central to scandals like the Russian collusion hoax and the Mueller investigation. The failure to disclose the laptop's authenticity, along with Brennan's claims, may have affected the election. It's claimed that Brennan's narrative of Trump colluding with Putin has contributed to the Ukraine war. Brennan should be worried about indictment, not just losing his security clearance.

The speaker claims the CIA interfered in the 2020 election, referencing RFK Jr.'s statements and using the word "tomatoes" to avoid censorship. They allege that Anthony Blinken enlisted Gina Haspel and 51 former intelligence officials to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation. The speaker points to a letter signed by these officials, including James Clapper and Michael Hayden, who they describe as "professional deep state liars." They highlight that the officials admitted they had no actual evidence of Russian involvement. The speaker asserts the CIA has a history of election interference and accuses the agency of protecting Joe Biden from scandals, including those related to his family. They also bring up Bill Clinton's association with Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker concludes by criticizing intelligence agencies' meddling and praising those who seek truth and honesty.

The revelation shows that 51 intelligence officials, who claimed Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation, were actually coordinated by the Biden campaign. This corruption involved Biden, Secretary of State Blinken, and partisan intelligence officials, aiming to hide the truth about the Biden family's influence peddling and corruption. During the debate, Joe Biden lied about this scandal, which is considered the biggest in American history. This cheating and election interference is a disgrace to our country, causing us to be mocked worldwide. The American people will not tolerate this any longer.

Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, claimed that the Intelligence Community believes Hunter Biden's laptop and its emails are part of a Russian disinformation campaign. However, the Director of National Intelligence stated that there is no intelligence supporting this claim and no evidence has been shared with Schiff or any other member of Congress. The Director emphasized that using the intelligence community to push a political narrative is unacceptable. He made it clear that Hunter Biden's laptop is not involved in any Russian disinformation campaign, and he believes the American people are aware of this.

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. The Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report. There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top. Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did.

The speaker discusses a letter that shows Gina Haspel, the head of the CIA, broke the legal mandate of not interfering domestically with partisan politics. The letter contained false information about Hunter Biden's laptop and was used to counter the narrative surrounding it. The timeline is important, as it shows the contact between Tony Blinken and Mike Morell in October, resulting in 51 signatories being added to the letter. The CIA's involvement in partisan politics is seen as election rigging, and the speaker calls for subpoenas to be issued to Gina Haspel, her leadership team, and those involved in adding signatures to the letter.

The speaker claims the CIA interfered in the 2020 election, referencing RFK Jr.'s statements and using the word "tomatoes" in place of "interference." They allege that platforms censoring this information are complicit in election interference. The speaker discusses a letter signed by 51 former senior intelligence officials who suggested that emails from Hunter Biden's laptop had "classic earmarks of a Russian information operation." The speaker points out that the officials admitted they didn't know if the emails were genuine or if Russia was involved. The speaker identifies some of the signatories as known liars, including James Clapper, Michael Hayden, and Gina Haspel. The speaker claims the CIA is forbidden from interfering in American elections but does so anyway to discredit information, including information related to Hunter Biden. They reference court testimony alleging Joe Biden was aware of and influenced by Hunter's business dealings. The speaker also references Bill Clinton's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker concludes by criticizing intelligence agencies for meddling and lying, and praises those who seek truth and honesty.

In October before the 2020 election, I signed an open letter saying emails about Hunter Biden had Russian info operation signs. We didn't confirm it was Russian. Media amplified it. Biden used it in the debate. I don't regret the letter. Nuance was lost, affecting the dynamic. Media should show nuance instead of sound bites. We wanted to point out Russian info campaign signs, not confirm it was Russian disinformation. It's not my fault if people don't look up definitions.

Fifty former national intelligence officials, including former heads of the CIA from both parties, have stated that the accusations against me are unfounded and part of a Russian disinformation campaign. With just four days left in the campaign, the emergence of this laptop story seems like a desperate attempt to smear me and my family. The intelligence community has overwhelming evidence of Russian involvement, and I believe the stories about my son are also linked to this. The majority of intelligence experts agree that there is no basis for these claims.

More than 50 ex-intelligence officials claimed the laptop story had Russian origins. Biden referenced this at a debate to counter Trump's accusations of Russian involvement. Translation: Over 50 former intelligence officials stated that the laptop story had Russian origins. Biden used this information during a debate to refute Trump's accusations of Russian involvement.

The investigation confirmed the authenticity of the laptop as early as late 2019, with both the DOJ and FBI aware of its legitimacy. In October 2020, reports emerged labeling the laptop as potential Russian disinformation, including comments from the current Secretary of State, which were tied to emails from the laptop. This appeared to be a coordinated effort to discredit the information ahead of the election. The assertion by former intelligence officials that the laptop had the hallmarks of a Russian operation was recognized as false. As a criminal investigator, it was clear that the narrative was misinformation aimed at obscuring the truth.

The speaker is asked about a letter they signed regarding the Hunter Biden situation. They express concern about Russian interference and misinformation, stating that intelligence agencies have found evidence of Russia pushing disinformation. They believe that disinformation is involved in this case and emphasize the importance of not trusting the Russians. When asked if they have any regrets, they state that they do not regret not trusting the Russians.

Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, released new evidence alleging that former President Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. The speaker asserts that while Obama publicly appeared to support a peaceful transfer of power, privately he took steps to sow discord and sabotage Trump, including manufacturing and politicizing intelligence that was used to justify baseless smears against the new president. The claim is that Trump had no involvement with Russia and that the Russia collusion narrative was a massive fraud, known to Obama and others involved, including former CIA director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and others. The speaker reiterates that DNI Gabbard’s report confirms there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, attributing any wrongdoing to Barack Obama and the “weaponized” intelligence agencies of the time. The Russia hoax is characterized as a blatant lie manufactured by Democrat political operatives, approved by Obama, and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump in his first administration. Allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some personally harmed by the false narrative. The speaker notes that much of this occurred during Trump’s first two years in office, consuming vast resources, time, and political capital to debunk the allegations at the highest levels of government. According to the speaker, nearly a decade later, declassification of documents by DNI Gabbard, alongside contributions from CIA Director Ratcliffe and committee Chairman Rick Crawford, supports a newly declassified 2020 report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. This report reportedly found the intel community did not have direct information that Vladimir Putin sought to help elect Trump in 2016; instead, Russia was allegedly preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory. The narrative claims that, at the time, Obama’s unusual stance led the intel community to publish implausible intelligence to sabotage the incoming president. The speaker asserts this constitutes one of the greatest political scandals in American history, noting that legacy media outlets such as the New York Times and the Washington Post were rewarded with Pulitzer Prizes for propagating political disinformation. The claim is made that those awards should be stripped from journalists who disseminated out-of-context and false intelligence to push a political narrative in service of the Democrats and associated intelligence actors.

During a 4-hour interview, it was revealed that Tony Blinken contacted Mike Morell about the laptop issue. Later that day, Blinken sent Morell a USA Today article, which was included in a letter signed by John Brennan, Morell, and 49 other former intelligence officials. They signed the letter using their titles, not just as private citizens. This was seen as using their influence to sway the election. The goal was to provide Joe Biden with a talking point for the final debate with President Trump. After the debate, Morell received praise from the Biden campaign.

Jessa News obtained an email between former CIA director Mike Morell and John Brennan. It concerns "the 51 intelligence professionals who tried to fake you into thinking that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation when it wasn't." Morell tells Brennan to "sign this letter because I'm, quote, trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue." The speaker notes "A man with a security clearance, a man with the title of CIA director knew that he wasn't creating an intelligence product, American civic duty with 51 people." He says this was to create "a political moment." "Damning evidence." "It is the ultimate proof that what went out on that letter was a political dirty trick coordinated with the Biden campaign."