TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Prior to the election, the FBI was aware of the Burisma scandals and the Hunter Biden laptop, which implicated them in a bribery scheme. Instead of properly investigating, the FBI attempted to hide the information, punish the senators involved, and censor American citizens by pressuring Twitter and other platforms to block reporting on the laptop.

The most alarming thing was the organized communication between the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and tech companies, involving flagging content in large numbers. Four federal judges have ruled that this violates the First Amendment. Former FBI officials within Twitter and other groups worked to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story, despite it not violating Twitter's terms of service. The FBI and CIA had their own internal groups within Twitter. The Aspen Institute held a workshop to discourage coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Content moderators at social media platforms have too much power in determining what Americans can say and see. This collusion between unelected bureaucrats and tech companies is inappropriate and a form of election interference. The censorship organizations tend to have a biased leaning.

Last July, Trump's server conspiracy theory shifted from being blocked from the FBI to hidden in Ukraine. Trump asked the Ukrainian president for a favor regarding Crowdstrike before requesting an investigation into Biden's son. In November, Trump mentioned the server on Fox and Friends, questioning why it was given to a Ukrainian company. The FBI never obtained the server.

The FBI alerted our team about the presence of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election. They informed us that there might be a release of similar content soon.

FBI Special Agent Elvis Chan informed Twitter and other social media platforms about a potential hack and leak operation before the 2020 presidential election, despite having no evidence. The government had possession of Hunter Biden's laptop for a year and pre-bunked the story that eventually came out. The Aspen Institute held a tabletop exercise to prepare for a story about Hunter Biden and Burisma, with journalists and big tech executives present. The exercise aimed to discount and censor the story. Fifty-one former intelligence officials signed a letter claiming the laptop story was Russian disinformation, with the intention of helping Joe Biden win the election. This coordinated effort to suppress information is concerning and undermines democracy.

The Trump campaign accuses Twitter and Facebook of censorship after the platforms blocked the spread of an unverified story about Joe Biden's son and a laptop allegedly full of his old emails. Experts suggest it resembles a disinformation campaign, potentially orchestrated by Russia. Social media outlets quickly limited the story's spread, with Twitter even suspending the accounts of the Trump campaign and White House press secretary. The intelligence community has warned the White House about Rudy Giuliani's involvement in promoting Russian disinformation. The FBI is investigating whether the unverified emails about Hunter Biden are part of a larger Russian disinformation effort. The president and his allies continue to push the story, while critics argue it is a smear campaign.

The FBI alerted our team about the possibility of a Russian propaganda dump similar to what happened in the 2016 election. They advised us to be on high alert.

The office of the director of National Intelligence would have only participated in election security briefings with private companies like Twitter, YouTube, Microsoft, and state election officials. These meetings did not involve content moderation or the Biden laptop as Russian disinformation. Therefore, there was no authority or reason for anyone in the intelligence community to say otherwise.

Former military contractors, including those currently employed, along with individuals from the navy, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security, were involved in censorship and the use of psychological operations and disinformation tactics against the American people. These tactics, developed by the US military and allies, were turned against the American people after Trump's election in 2016. Social media companies, with potential government support, engaged in mass censorship. The Hunter Biden laptop in October 2020 played a significant role in this story. FBI personnel were working at Twitter when it censored the New York Post story about the laptop, creating the perception of illegitimacy. The laptop was later confirmed to be real, debunking the conspiracy theory of Russian manipulation. US intelligence officials spread disinformation about the laptop, leading many to be deceived.

The FBI initially refused to take the copy of Hunter Biden's laptop in October 2019, indicating their reluctance to get involved. They approached the speaker in November 2019 to understand their concerns but still hesitated to take the laptop. Eventually, in December 2019, they obtained it through a subpoena. However, during the impeachment trial, the laptop did not surface, leading the speaker to believe that the FBI prioritized protecting the Bidens over the truth or safeguarding.

They say the FBI anticipated consternation around the election and actually prepared plans for January 6. They held a tabletop exercise in Boston in August 2020, five months before January 6. Kash Patel recently turned over memos to Congress at the request of Chairman Barry Lautenberg (Lautomilk) of the J-six investigation. The memos show the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging or contested election, with both sides agitated and likely to escalate to violence. They devised specific strategies, including embedding informants inside the groups where political violence or agitation might occur. They say the FBI had two dozen informants on the ground the morning of January 6. They also recommended mass prosecutions, even for the most minor crimes, which is described as exactly what the FBI did after January 6. Two big takeaways: the strategy appears to have been hatched months before and then carried out, and it involved a clear double standard compared to the political violence by the left in 2020. The FBI allegedly embedded informants in a broad range of groups, including Antifa and right-wing groups, and gathered intelligence suggesting a bad episode would occur. Barry Lautemux reportedly stated that while the warnings from informants were strong, the preparations of warnings to the brethren of the Capitol in Washington, DC did not exist. In other words, warnings were not passed along. The claim is that two failed examples of the Chris era of the FBI show that, knowing something was going to happen, they implemented a strategy that hurt conservatives but not liberals and did not warn the people who could actually prevent the violence. This is described as the legacy of the Chris Ray FBI, now laid open in documents for all to see. The question is whether any part shows that Bill Barr or Chris Ray briefed the president or his staff, or senior White House officials after the tabletop exercise and the development of the informant plan. The answer given is no: there is no documentation showing that the attorney general, Barr or other brass were briefed, and no mention that the White House, Homeland Security Department, Capitol Police, or Washington DC Metropolitan Police were alerted. The characterization is that the FBI remained insular, echoing the same “diseases” seen before nine-eleven.

In October 2020, with Joe Biden "in trouble" regarding his laptop, Anthony Blinken, Biden's campaign aide, allegedly told Michael Morrell to "round them up." Subsequently, 51 intelligence authorities swore the laptop had "all the hallmarks of Russian information." During the debate, when Trump attacked Biden about the laptop, Biden responded that 51 intelligence authorities swore it was a product of Russian espionage. A poll later indicated that if people had known the laptop was authenticated, it would have changed their vote. The laptop was in the FBI's possession and deemed authentic, but Christopher Wray's FBI was partnering with Twitter and Facebook to suppress the story.

We learn about DC leaks and the connection to APT 28, a Russian military intelligence hacking group. The morning the Hunter Biden story broke in the New York Post, it was confusing. We didn't know what to believe, but it seemed like a possible hacking campaign by APT 28. Despite that, I didn't feel comfortable removing the content from Twitter.

Facebook and Twitter faced issues with a story from the New York Post containing lies spread by Rudy Giuliani. The story, known to be false, was Russian misinformation fed to Donald Trump and the New York Post. The FBI is investigating Giuliani, not the Bidens. The situation raises questions about the credibility of the source and the involvement of Russian intelligence. The October surprise appears to be a Russian disinformation campaign orchestrated by Giuliani. The use of a tabloid to smear a presidential candidate may lead to criminal charges.

The Trump campaign accuses Twitter and Facebook of censorship after the social media companies blocked the spread of an unverified story about Joe Biden's son and a laptop allegedly full of his old emails. Experts suggest it may be a disinformation campaign, possibly orchestrated by Russia. Social media outlets limited the story's spread, with Twitter even suspending the accounts of the Trump campaign and White House press secretary. The intelligence community has warned about Russian disinformation efforts, and there are concerns that the story may be part of this larger campaign. The FBI is investigating the authenticity of the emails. Biden denies any wrongdoing.

The Trump campaign accused Twitter and Facebook of censorship for blocking an unverified story about Joe Biden's son and a laptop allegedly containing his emails. Experts claim the situation has hallmarks of information laundering, reminiscent of 2016. This time, emails purportedly from Biden's son are being disseminated by a tabloid, with Rudy Giuliani claiming he obtained them from a computer repairman. Giuliani has admitted to working with a known Russian agent to find damaging information on the Bidens. A former FBI operative suggests the story resembles a disinformation campaign, potentially involving stolen emails placed on laptops left at a repair store to launder the information. He guesses Russians are behind it. Social media outlets limited the story's spread, with Twitter briefly suspending accounts that shared it. Allies on Capitol Hill cried censorship, while the Senate Judiciary Committee wants answers. The goal appears to be casting a cloud over the front runner using emails to create an air of scandal. Republican-led investigations have never uncovered evidence of wrongdoing by Vice President Biden.

Leading up to the 2020 election, Twitter had regular meetings with various government agencies, including the FBI, DOJ, DHS, and DNI, to engage in unconstitutional censorship. The FBI paid Twitter over $3.4 million to censor stories like the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. There was a corrupt relationship between the FBI and Twitter, with former FBI officials joining Twitter and creating their own communication channels. Polls show that if people had known about the Hunter Biden laptop story, 53% would have changed their vote, including 61% of Democrats. This is election meddling and collusion by the FBI, funded by taxpayers. The FBI's politicization extends beyond Twitter, as seen in their targeting of parents at school board meetings, which was prompted by the White House and the secretary of education. This corruption must be addressed to protect the American people from government weaponization.

They accused the FBI of warning Facebook and Twitter about Hunter's laptop, claiming it was Russian disinformation. When the New York Post revealed the laptop, it was censored by the platforms, citing the previous warning.

The speaker discusses the intelligence community's efforts to share information with social media platforms to address inauthentic content. They clarify that the office of the director of National Intelligence would only participate in approved election security briefings with private companies like Twitter, YouTube, Microsoft, and state election officials. These briefings focus on discussing threats and have nothing to do with content moderation or the Biden laptop as Russian disinformation. The speaker mentions that there were weekly meetings between the FBI, DHS, and Twitter, but only one reference to their office. They hope that this reference was part of the approved process for election security briefings.

During the election, there was controversy surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop story on Twitter. Facebook took a different approach, as they were warned by the FBI about potential Russian propaganda. They implemented a third-party fact-checking program to determine if the information was false. While the investigation was ongoing, the distribution of the story on Facebook was decreased, but people were still allowed to share and consume it. The ranking in the News Feed was slightly lower, resulting in fewer people seeing it. However, many individuals were still able to share the story.

In 2020, the speaker received a laptop with files allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden. They compared the laptop's information with verified sources like Secret Service travel records and suspicious activity reports. The laptop's emails matched up with the records, including wire transfers and correspondence from Hunter Biden's business partner. The speaker's team in Florida conducted this research, while major news outlets showed no interest in pursuing the story. The speaker believes that if similar information had involved other political figures, it would have been considered important news.

The Trump campaign accused Twitter and Facebook of censorship for blocking an unverified story about Hunter Biden's laptop. Experts suggest it resembles a disinformation campaign, potentially orchestrated by Russia, involving stolen emails and planted laptops. Social media limited the story's spread, even suspending accounts. Rudy Giuliani is identified as a key figure, with reports indicating intelligence officials warned the White House about Russia using him to spread disinformation to President Trump. The FBI is investigating whether the unverified emails are part of a broader Russian effort to denigrate Joe Biden's campaign. Giuliani's involvement and the story's timing raise concerns about Russian interference in the election. Intelligence agencies believe Russia is actively working to undermine Biden's campaign. Some suggest the President is condoning Russian interference. The Biden campaign dismisses the allegations as disinformation. Hunter Biden said he has no idea if the laptop is his.

The investigation confirmed the authenticity of the laptop as early as late 2019, with both the DOJ and FBI aware of its legitimacy. In October 2020, reports emerged labeling the laptop as potential Russian disinformation, including comments from the current Secretary of State, which were tied to emails from the laptop. This appeared to be a coordinated effort to discredit the information ahead of the election. The assertion by former intelligence officials that the laptop had the hallmarks of a Russian operation was recognized as false. As a criminal investigator, it was clear that the narrative was misinformation aimed at obscuring the truth.

Google, Facebook, and others were caught cheating in the last election, referencing "51 agents" and the laptop. It was claimed that they affected the election by many points. The speaker stated that anyone caught cheating in the election will be pursued more aggressively than ever before because they are a threat. Democrats are described as the real threat to democracy.