reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 explains that not all Republicans are registered with APAC, and that many colleagues would vote with him if not for political backlash back home. He says some Republicans tell him, “that’s wrong what APAC is doing to you,” and they want to talk to their APAC person. He notes that nearly everyone except him has an APAC person, which he likens to a babysitter who is always talking to you for APAC. When these members are in DC, they lunch with their APAC contacts, who have their cell numbers and keep conversations going. He mentions that four members of Congress have said they’ll talk to their APAC person to try to get ads dialed back. He questions why this isn’t more widely known, arguing that it benefits nobody for constituents to know they have a “buddy system with somebody who represents a foreign country.” Speaker 1 asks what APAC is, and Speaker 0 explains the concept further, noting that the APAC person is connected to the congressman and that this dynamic exists on the Republican side. He says the APAC person is embedded in the caucus presence, and that conversations with them occur when members come to DC. He remarks that this arrangement is not beneficial for public disclosure, so members don’t tell their constituents about it. Speaker 1 asks if any other country does anything similar. Speaker 0 responds emphatically that they do not: “Not only do they not have a Putin guy. Look. They don’t they they don’t have a Britain guy. They don’t have an Australian guy. They don’t have a Germany dude.” He asserts that APAC is the only country with someone who uniformly matches a congressman to an APAC contact, and that there is likely a spreadsheet at APAC mapping the APAC contact to the congressman’s votes on issues. He adds that APAC pays for trips for congressmen and their spouses to go to Israel; he notes he may not be the only Republican who hasn’t taken the APAC Israel trip, but he’s among a minority who hasn’t yet. Speaker 1 asks about the trip, and Speaker 0 describes it as “vacationy,” including visits to the Western Wall and other sites, and mentions swimming in the Dead Sea. Speaker 1 comments that Israel is a great country and that Jerusalem is wonderful, but clarifies that this appreciation is distinct from the government of Israel and its politics. Speaker 0 agrees that Israelis are entrepreneurial and publicly minded, and Speaker 1 shares a personal fondness for Israel, praising the country and its people, while noting the difference between the people and the government. Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 discuss their affection for Israel, with Speaker 1 distinguishing his personal love of the place from political influence, and both agreeing that Israel is a special place, with Speaker 0 emphasizing the distinction between people and government.

The transcript primarily presents a lengthy roster of individuals associated with Donald J. Trump, listing roles such as donors, endorsers, and senior advisers or officials connected to Trump campaigns, committees, and transitions. Among the named people are Michael Abood, Paul Eshleikner, Miriam Adelson, Gil Desert, Michael Desert, Lewis Eisenberg, Boris Epstein, Steven Feinberg, Lawrence Fink, Alan Fishman, David Friedman, Samuel Fox, Alan Garthend, Peter Kaliko, Daniel Kowalski, Charles Kushner, Jared Kushner, Keith Schiller, Steven Schwartzman, Melvin Semblar, Jakob Shechem, Vanessa Trump, Kevin Walsh, Mark Weinberger, Ronald Weiser, Andrew Weiss, Ellen Weisselberg, Lawrence Weitzner, Steven Witkoff, Steven Winn, Richard Lafrac, and Daniel Jurgen, among others. The list includes titles such as donor, endorser, member, executive committee member, finance vice chairman, and various advisory or transition roles, associated with Trump’s campaign, victory fund, inaugural committee, strategic and policy forums, and related initiatives. Following the roster, the speaker shifts to a conspiratorial critique of the media, arguing that it is absurd to claim that “the Jewish owned media really hates Donald Trump when they actually love him.” The speaker cites CNN as an example, naming Aviv Nevo as the major shareholder and Jeff Zucker as head of CNN, along with “Zionist” propagandists such as Jake Tapper, Wolf Blitzer, and Larry King, asserting that these individuals and others demonstrate a Zionist influence. The speaker contends that the media’s supposed opposition to Trump is a Zionist script written to deceive a “dumbed down and ignorant populace.” The closing assertion reiterates a key claim: “The bottom line is you cannot be anti establishment, anti globalist, and be pro Zionist, pro Israel.” The speaker concludes that this is the real truth, and that nothing will change until it is recognized.

Speaker 0: This is not just a story about violence and chaos; this is a money story. At the Government Accountability Institute, Peter Schweitzer and I followed the money to the top of what we call the protest industrial complex, Riot Inc. We found a network of NGOs—not just the Soros/Open Society network, but also the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, Foreign Cash, and other big left-wing funders, including Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland. They’re pouring money into this ecosystem. Here are three money facts about Riot Inc. Number one: Riot Inc. has many divisions like any corporation. It doesn’t just have the Antifa boots on the ground division; it has PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a well-funded legal division to get these boots back on the ground as quickly as possible. It has investors I mentioned. Number two: We have identified dozens of radical organizations—not just decentralized Antifa groups, but dozens of radical organizations—that have received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors. These include lawyer groups and groups that advocate for calling good honest Americans fascists, etc. Number three: More than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding has flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to these very groups themselves. There was an event in Atlanta called Stop Cop City; over 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism. These groups received money for that from both the billionaire class and taxpayer money. Additionally, this money helps fund decentralized crowdfunding platforms that support Antifa, the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork (which had links to the ICE facility attack), the Socialist Rifle Association, and others. Even though some groups don’t have LLCs or EIN numbers, they can still get paid. Some funding platforms are funded by this network that we call Riot Inc. Speaker 1: Do you know the name of any of the funders? Do you know the names? Because if you do, I’d like you to give them to Cash or Pam—or Christie? Speaker 0: Absolutely. Speaker 1: Or Christie? Speaker 0: Yes, we’ll do that. Speaker 1: As soon as you can. That’s all of you. Because you probably know the names after a certain period of time, you tend to find out. But these are people that do not have good intention for the country and that’s treasonous probably. So if you could, it would be very important if you could do that, it would be great. Speaker 0: it

The speaker alleges that people in TPSA are trying to discredit anyone who questions “their narrative,” specifically related to Charlie Kirk’s assassination, and claims that ongoing behavior “reinforced the fact that you’re part of the coverup.” They then focus on an “endowment” described as one of the “shadiest” entities in Turning Point’s structure. The speaker says Turning Point has “like six entities” and that these entities allow Turning Point to move money while “water down any sort of forensic accounting.” They claim Turning Point Endowment has zero employees, no websites, and supports no programs, while holding $69.9 million “as of their 990 filing in 2024.” The speaker says they traced every dollar in and out of the endowment and that, for years from 2017 through 2024, the endowment’s money comes from Turning Point USA, with “zero outside donors” providing funds. The speaker says TPUSA reported giving money to the endowment as one of its mission goals, and characterizes an endowment as a “war chest” to move money in during a “bad year,” which the speaker says occurred when TPUSA had deficits in 2023. The speaker claims the endowment owns real estate connected to Turning Point: they say it owns 4930 East Beverly Road (also identified as Turning Point Action’s address), 4940 Beverly Road (Turning Point USA’s address), and that the endowment’s letterhead address lists 4950 (next door). They state that Turning Point USA “deeded its own building to the endowment” as a “charitable contribution,” and that in 2021 it bought in cash the political arm’s real estate. They add that “the mystery donor is themselves,” which they say they found through deed filings. They describe a “rent math” analysis: the speaker says that for three straight years, Turning Point’s charitable program donation to the endowment was for “occupancy and depreciation” and the upkeep of Turning Point’s own buildings, matching dollar-for-dollar. They state that the endowment has not had an independent audit and that, on their 990 forms, the relevant audit box is “always no” for the endowment; they add that TPUSA was only “no in 2024.” They provide figures: four years of building costs totaling $949,000, with rent collected back totaling $232,000, and claim that the remaining amount went to leasing those buildings “to themselves, and the political arm.” They also say the rent line lists rent as zero and that the speaker characterizes this as “penalty of perjury” if false. The speaker further claims timing and purchasing activity: on August 1, 2025, they say Turning Point Endowment bought a third building for $3.85 million, which they claim would not show up on 990s until 2027, and they say the purchase occurs “40 days before Charlie Kirk is assassinated.” The speaker also alleges that on August 1, 2025, a “Doge-like assessment” was requested 30 days before the assassination. They claim additional financial activity: in 2023, when TPUSA had a deficit and assets fell 41%, the endowment sent “500K” while putting “some $9 million” into private equity, which they say cannot be exited for 10 years. They state the private equity fund names and fund managers are “secret,” and claim $565,000 was paid in investment fees over four years to someone not named on other forms. They also describe March 2025 filing activity: they say three Turning Point entities filed within a 72-hour period, and that “buried inside of that” the endowment “became five,” adding new names including Justin Olson (CFO, previously Arizona State Corporate Commissioner) and Frank Carney. They conclude: “This endowment, in my opinion, exists to hide money.”

Kamala Harris partnered with BlackRock, a firm managing almost $10 trillion in assets and allegedly acquiring almost all assets. BlackRock is supposedly receiving private information from the Biden administration. Michael Pyle, BlackRock's global chief investment strategist, will join the Biden-Harris administration as Kamala Harris' chief economist. Pyle is an Obama administration veteran who also worked on economic policy with Hillary's presidential campaign. Pyle will be the third former BlackRock official to join the administration. The speaker suggests that financial independence is crucial because governments promise much but deliver little, increasing their power, control, and wealth. The speaker questions the implications of this partnership.

The speaker says they “followed the money” to what they call the “protest industrial complex,” “Riot Inc.,” and identified a network of NGOs funding the ecosystem. They state the funding extends beyond the Soros/Open Society network to other funding networks, including the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, and “Foreign Cash,” along with “big, left wing” funders, including non-citizens. The speaker names Mr. Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland as an example of such funders. The speaker presents three “money facts” about Riot Inc. First, they describe Riot Inc. as having divisions similar to a corporation: not only an “Antifa boots on the ground” division, but also PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a “very well funded legal division” to “get these boots on the ground back on the streets as quickly as possible,” alongside the investors previously mentioned. Second, they claim they identified “dozens of radical organizations” that received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors, including “lawyer groups” that advocate for calling “good honest Americans fascists.” Third, they claim that more than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to “these very groups themselves.” They cite an Atlanta event called “Stop Cop City,” saying more than 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism and that these groups received money from both “the billionaire class” and “taxpayer money” for that. The speaker also claims that this money helps fund decentralized crowdfunding platforms used by groups such as “Antifa,” the “John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork” (linked by the speaker to an attack on an ice facility), and the “Socialist Rifle Association.” They add that groups without LLCs or EIN numbers can still be paid through these crowdfunding platforms. The speaker closes by saying they will keep “following the money” and thanks the audience for leadership.

The speaker alleges that the Pritzker family is a very prominent political family with 64 NGOs. They claim that for this single NGO, many people work for no compensation as trustees, while others are paid substantial salaries—upwards of a quarter of a million dollars. Specific figures cited include a Senior VP for Policy Research earning $400,000 a year, Strategy Affairs at $330,000 a year, and a VP at $300,000 a year. The speaker asserts there are 64 NGOs funded by taxpayers, stating, “that’s all your money.” The analogy used is that influential families in government are like a thief who found the bank vault door left open, with each NGO acting as “another bag for cash” that is filled and handed off to friends, with new LLCs created as needed. The speaker claims the NGOs “achieve anything? No. Not really.” and “Do they build anything? Certainly not. No.” The overall portrayal is that the NGOs are about distributing cash among associated individuals rather than delivering tangible results.

The speaker, who claims a background with the CIA and NSA and now runs a corporate intelligence firm, discusses an investigation into TPUSA (Turning Point USA). They present that on 09/02/2025 Charlie Kirk sent an internal memo announcing Justin Streiff as Chief Operating Officer, stating Streiff would lead a “doge like” effort into TPUSA’s financials and operations, described as an internal audit without triggering red flags. Eight days later, the speaker claims Charlie Kirk was murdered, and within the week Eric Kirk was announced as CEO, with the audit and the “doge like effort” never materializing. TPUSA is identified as a 501(c)(3) with public financials, enabling the speaker to review them. The speaker positions themselves as an independent investigator who followed the money to look for fraud or red flags, noting that a key part of such an audit is examining vendors and consultants. They focus on three entities: Lion Rock Ventures, Cloverstone, and GSM Strategies. The speaker asserts that these three LLCs shared a director and an address, and that Stacy Sheridan is the common individual involved in all of them. Sheridan is described as the TPUSA senior advancement employee, earning upwards of $200,000 annually to perform the same function allegedly outsourced to these consulting firms. The speaker implies that Sheridan owned the consulting businesses. A further red flag highlighted is the formation and quick dissolution of Lion Rock Ventures (formed in 2019 and dissolved about a year and a half later) and Cloverstone (formed and dissolved while Sheridan was performing the same job for TPUSA). The nine ninety forms for these entities allegedly show directors and Sheridan’s position sign conflict of interest forms, which the speaker claims indicates a conflict of interest given Sheridan’s dual roles. The firms are said to have generated nearly $3,000,000 across four years. The speaker mentions a $350,000 payment that is frequently discussed in relation to these deals, stating that they found it in the Form 990 (9/90) filings and that they will discuss it in part two. The transcript ends with “They do” and promises a continuation with a full write-up on a Substack channel and a new podcast next week, inviting support.

Speaker 1 describes the scope of funding tracked by their organization. They state they have tracked over $60,000,000 according to the latest 990 disclosures, directed to approximately 14 groups—some national, others on the ground. Examples of groups involved include the ACLU (providing legal defense and facilitating trainings for some tactics described by Senator Corin) and Democracy Forward, Take Minnesota. Take Minnesota has reportedly received over $10,000,000 from these large NGO networks, including the Neville Roysingham network, Indivisible, National Lawyers Guild, CTUL, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Minnesota Care, Minnesota 3-5-0, Voices for Racial Justice, and others. The speaker emphasizes that the total spans at least 14 groups and more than $60,000,000 in disclosed funding. Speaker 0 asks where the money is coming from and how it flows to these groups. Speaker 1 explains that they have built a database with hundreds of thousands of rows of grants from networks such as the Soros network, Arabella Funding Network, the Neville Royce Singham Funding Network, and many others, including Tides, the Ford Foundation Network, and the Rockefeller Funding Network. These are described as massive NGOs with billions of dollars to spend on all kinds of coordinated protest or, in this case, riot activity.

The transcript describes a network of “brightest minds” across media, tech, and politics who, it says, “play dumb” about racing and engage in “covering up each other's dirty tricks.” It suggests that influential figures are linked through relationships and coordinated conduct, framing the scene as interconnected rather than separate. It names “Elon” and then references “Sam and Mac and Chew,” implying that these individuals are part of the same ecosystem. The transcript also explicitly points to “Rotary Gates and Brad Smith too,” connecting those names to a broader theme of manipulation. It states that “rigging elections is nothing new,” and characterizes election outcomes as determined by “key swing states,” described as only “a few,” while claiming that “the future of civilization” is at stake. It then lists a series of mechanisms and alleged participants, including “illegal lottery, bribes and mistakes.” The transcript includes the phrase “Super Brad Schemmel was a super bad joke,” then continues with additional names and organizations: “Antonio Gracias and Aspen Institute.” It also references “Pritzker and Epstein,” followed by “Kimball Square Roots,” “Gable Man,” “Freemason and Rotary too,” and then “Flynn and Rakeland and the MyPillow crew controlling all sides.” Further, the transcript asserts that these groups and figures work together: “That's what they do.” It mentions “Titletown Tech and Microsoft build,” “Foxconn in China buy,” and “Kirk is shot, Orest's throat explodes,” presenting these as part of the same overarching pattern described earlier. The transcript continues with a broad set of names and media figures: “Alex Jones, Rogan and Elon enjoy your smoke.” It also includes “George Webb, Ian Carroll and the Cleanup Bros.” It claims that “no one asks about the super secret CNP no more,” framing this as a change in public attention or inquiry. Finally, the transcript concludes with: “Every branch,” reinforcing the idea that multiple sectors or divisions are involved within the same system.

We have a prominent political family that runs 64 NGOs, and it looks like a lot of people are working for free as trustees while others are getting paid huge salaries. For example, we see a Senior VP for policy research making $400,000 a year and someone in strategy affairs making $330,000 a year. Remember, this is all from your tax dollars. These families in government are like thieves who found an open bank vault. Each NGO is a bag for cash. They stuff as much money as possible into each one, then they start a new LLC with a new purpose. Do they achieve anything? Not really. Do they build anything or make anything better for anyone? Not tangibly, but the people working for them are doing quite well.

The discussion centers on four nonprofit entities linked to Turning Point: Turning Point USA, Turning Point Action, Turning Point Endowment, and America’s Turning Point. Three are 501(c)(3) organizations, Turning Point Action is a 501(c)(4). The difference highlighted is that 501(c)(3) organizations cannot engage in political activity, while 501(c)(4) can participate in up to 50% political activity; there is also Turning Point PAC, a 100% political activity entity. The speaker rejects the idea that having multiple nonprofit companies is normal, arguing that, typically, shell entities are created for distinct activities (e.g., Turning Point Endowment for investments; Turning Point Action as a 501(c)(4)), but questions why America’s Turning Point exists as a separate entity since its descriptions are similar to Turning Point USA and notes a key difference: Charlie Kirk managed Turning Point USA, while Tyler Boyer managed America’s Turning Point. The speaker suggests America’s Turning Point was created to provide Charlie Kirk plausible deniability and to give Tyler Boyer a separate 501(c)(3) that he could control, potentially without Kirk’s knowledge. The nine ninety form is cited as indicating that Turning Point USA’s other educational programs include campus leadership programs hosted by America’s Turning Point, with grants totaling $8,600,000. The speaker questions what those students are doing that costs $8.6 million and speculates that Tyler Boyer uses these students as a pipeline for work under his control. The speaker then posits a scenario: with the 2024 Trump election approaching, Boyer may need more people for ballot harvesting and could be transferring $8.6 million from Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA to America’s Turning Point to hire people for illegal political activity, presenting it as nonpartisan “get out the vote” work to avoid scrutiny. The claim is made that in photos there is no visible nonpolitical activity, prompting the assertion of likely illegality. Further allegations connect to Donald Trump, suggesting the letter with Trump’s alleged handwriting is important as evidence of misappropriated funds used for Trump’s campaign and a potential cover-up in which Trump would be involved. The speaker links this to Steve Bannon’s nonprofit fraud case, noting Bannon’s executives were charged for using funds for a different purpose than donors promised, and that Bannon’s outcome involved a guilty plea rather than prison, implying a harsher outcome for Turning Point’s leadership. The named individuals accused of knowledge or involvement include Tyler Boyer, CFO Justin Olson, Andrew Colvet, Blake Neff, and Erica Kirk, with a suggestion that anyone aware of the political activity and cover-up would face prison. The speaker calls for law enforcement action and criticizes Trump for allegedly tolerating election-related fraud among his associates, concluding with anger over the situation and a perceived hypocrisy.

We have various stakeholders, including business, politics, governments, NGOs, trade unions, media, experts, scientists, academia, religious leaders, and social entrepreneurs. These stakeholders play crucial roles in our organization. They contribute to our partnerships, provide expertise, and drive technological advancements for future solutions.

Speaker 0: Take this in and understand what we’re actually dealing with. Many views exist—from Trump being a pedophile protecting pedophile buddies, to Israel infiltration and cover-ups, to it being a Democrat hoax. The reality, as described here, is that there is a supranational global cabal that has operated for nearly a hundred years, using money laundering, blackmail, drug trafficking, human trafficking, and other nefarious operations to fund and overthrow countries, serving as the shadow power of the world. We can see who these people are, their intentions, and the outcomes of their policies, and they are still being shoehorned into the most important positions in the world specifically because they’re part of this cabal. Main players mentioned include Larry Summers, who, per Epstein documents, was named executor of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate after his death. The money Epstein received from Les Wexner and others to create a starting fund and build a reputation as a financier is said to be returning to the coffers of Larry Summers, seen as part of this operation. The analogy is that this operation is like a corporation with Epstein as a brand under an umbrella, where if one asset (like Irish Spring) fails, its resources are absorbed back into the wider corporate structure. Summers, formerly Treasury Secretary, who helped destroy Glass-Steagall and contributed to the 2008 market crash dynamics, is said to have his bailout-money influence guided by Larry Fink at BlackRock. Summers, who was head of Harvard and later appointed to OpenAI’s board, is linked to the governance of the AI company behind ChatGPT. Larry Ellison is described as corresponding with Epstein and Ehud Barak (former Israeli prime minister) about which politicians serve their interests, including arranging a meeting between Marco Rubio and Tony Blair due to shared interests in this cabal. Epstein is depicted as a central, manipulative figure involved in selling weapons from Israel, meddling in elections, and influencing universities in Russia, raising questions about his influence and reach. The speaker emphasizes Epstein’s reach across political and corporate spheres and the question of his power, asking how such influence is possible. Speaker 1: The question is, how do you go about that? Speaker 0: He didn’t even go to school for trading; it’s all fabricated. He is a spymaster and a kingpin in a mafia. This group, including Les Wexner, Jeffrey Epstein, Larry Summers, Larry Ellison, Donald Trump (at this point), is part or perhaps the managing structure of the same organization discussed in the Eagle two documents from the 1960s, where the CIA sought autonomy from Congress by creating its own income streams, including drug trafficking in Vietnam. The opioid and drug-running links are tied to Iran-Contra, with George H. W. Bush involved in opium trade and the drug-running networks. Bill Gates and other figures are alleged to have involved in cover-ups during CIA-driven operations in South America, with Gary Webb’s Dark Alliance cited as exposing such networks. Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, when Bill was governor of Arkansas, allegedly helped run headquarters in Mina for flights to and from Colombia, spreading drugs across the United States. The assertion is that the same group runs drugs, rigs elections, and is involved in various crises, including alleged connections to COVID-19, Russiagate, 9/11, and the assassination of Charlie Kirk, forming a pattern of the last decades of upheaval in America. The discussion moves toward Epstein’s network and the sources of his money, with emails revealing connections, against a backdrop of broad search for Trump and the prevalence of unconfirmed, baseless anonymous claims. The core claim is that the true representation is the “new world order” and a banking-based intelligence network where intelligence agencies originated from banks. The CIA’s founding from the OSS is tied to MI6, which allegedly drew on the Rothschild banking intelligence, tying the CIA, MI6, and banking elites together. The speaker concludes that the same names—running drugs, stealing elections, burning down skyscrapers, and flying airplanes—appear repeatedly, linking DEI, ESG, white discrimination claims, and Epstein to the same global web.

The speaker questions whether it is strange that leading environmental organizations have met for fifty years with CEOs of heavily polluting corporations while the natural world keeps getting worse. They say that critics of the WAF are right when considering who the most important partners are that account for almost 71% of the WES budget. The partners include BlackRock, the Open Society Foundations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and many other large corporations, of whom Vanguard and BlackRock own the shares directly or indirectly.

The transcript claims the organizers “followed the money” to what they call “Riot Inc.” and its “protest industrial complex,” stating it involves a network of NGOs funded by multiple sources, including the Soros/Open Society network, the Arabella funding network, the Tides funding network, the network of Neville Roy Singham, “Foreign Cash,” and “big left wing funders.” It also says some funders “aren’t citizens of this country,” citing Mr. Hansjorg Veiss of Switzerland. The speaker presents three “money facts” about Riot Inc. First, like any corporation, Riot Inc. is described as having many divisions beyond an “anti… boots on the ground division,” including PR, marketing, and a “very well-funded legal division” intended to get “boots on the ground” back on the streets quickly. The transcript states that Riot Inc. has “investors that I mentioned.” Second, the speaker claims “dozens of radical organizations” have received “more than one hundred million dollars” from Riot Inc. investors. These organizations are described as including “lawyer groups” and groups that advocate labeling “good, honest Americans” as “fascists.” Third, the transcript claims “more than one hundred million dollars in US taxpayer funding” flowed into these funding networks, including “at least four million dollars” to “these very groups themselves.” It cites an Atlanta event called “Stop Cop City,” saying “over sixty rioters were charged with domestic terrorism,” and claims these groups received money for that from both “the billionaire class as well as taxpayer money.” The transcript further claims the money helps fund “de-decentralized crowdfunding platforms,” naming groups and references such as “Antifa,” “the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork” (stated as having links to an attack on an ice facility), and “the Socialist Rifle Association.” It adds that some crowdfunding platforms are funded by the Riot Inc network, and asserts that lacking LLCs or EIN numbers “doesn’t mean they can’t get paid.” The speaker closes by stating they will “keep following the money” and thanking leadership.

Speaker 0 says there is a broader “network” tied to history, referencing August Belmont as a Rothschild agent who was Democratic Party chairman in the nineteenth century. Speaker 1 agrees and contrasts this with some official Rothschild histories that claim the family never had influence in American life. Speaker 1 says it is common knowledge in American history that August Belmont, as Democratic National Chairman, was an American agent of the Rothschild family. Speaker 1 also discusses the Rockefeller family, saying the Rockefellers originally received financing for their oil enterprises from Rothschild-influenced or Rothschild-controlled U.S. banks that acted as fronts for the Rothschild family. Speaker 1 predicts that the Rockefellers will ultimately “hardly be worth anything at all,” arguing they have been promoted by the media as the American power elite while functioning as fronts for the Rothschilds. Speaker 1 points to the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, describing it as an “insidious power block,” and says Rockefeller family influence is a primary influence within it. Speaker 1 claims that the Council on Foreign Relations is only a junior “American cousin” of the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London (RIIIA), and that the Royal Institute functions as the foreign policy arm of the Rothschild family. Speaker 1 characterizes the American organizations as well-funded front groups for Rothschild influence and says people often avoid going beyond describing the Council on Foreign Relations as an “internationalist group,” because taking the next step would mean asserting it is a fronting mechanism for Rothschild influence and an “international Zionist imperium” Speaker 1 says the Rothschilds are trying to impose on the planet. Speaker 0 begins to say they noticed something years ago, but the transcript ends mid-sentence.

Politicians have close ties with APAC, like a babysitter. They have lunch and conversations with APAC members who influence their decisions. Some congress members even ask their "APAC guy" to tone down ads. This buddy system is surprising and not widely known.

The transcript traces an expansive network centered on Michael Flynn, naming numerous figures, organizations, and suggested linkages to illustrate a web of connections across politics, media, and private security firms. Key connections and chains include: - Laura Logan: married to intelligence contractor Joe Burkett; friends with Ed Butowski, involved in the Seth Rich wiretapping through Shadow Box, connected to Michael Levine, Manuel Chavez, Thomas Schoenberger, Trevor Fitzgibbon (who ran Silent Partner, involved with RFK Jr.’s PAC); links to WikiLeaks, Matt Couch, Malia Zimmerman; her husband’s role in the Lincoln Group, part of a joint psychological operation that evolved into Strategic Social and then Constellis (Blackwater’s successor after mergers with Triple Canopy). Specific personnel named include Juliet Produs, Thomas McMagnanny, Jay Christie, Tom Cadis, Matt Mann, Greg Mulligan, Matt Luckett. - Blackwater lineage: Eric Prince (connected to Edgar Prince) is linked to training James O’Keefe and helping set up Project Veritas; he runs an unplugged phone through Iran Karpen, tied to NSO, Q Cyber Technologies, and OSY Technologies that supposedly fund Michael Flynn. - Flynn’s broader network: Jerome Coursey (friend of Ted Malik) connected to the United Nations, US State Department, WEF, and the Committee on Foreign Relations; Coursey is also linked to Roger Stone and Alex Jones; Flynn is connected to Millie Weaver (Shadowgate) and Patrick Bergey; Alex Jones and Milo are also part of the connections; Flynn’s ties extend to Dustin Nemos. - Relationships to power and media figures: Eric Prince’s sister Betsy DeVos, married to Dick DeVos, funding Blaze Media (Blaze TV) with Dave Rubin, Glenn Beck, Jason Whitlock, Daniel Horowitz, Sarah Gonzales, Mark Levin, Steve Deese, among others. Flynn’s connection to Donald Trump is highlighted, including Trump’s appointment of Flynn to the US military academy alongside David Belavia, Wesley Hunt, Dan Crenshaw? (the text says Dan Walrith), and Steve Bannon’s daughter; Trump also appointed Dina Powell, Charlie Kirk, and Tommy Tuberville to the Air Force Board of Visitors. - Media figures and influencers: Milo connected to Breitbart and Steve Bannon, who is linked to Brock Pierce; Milo’s collaborations with Marjorie Taylor Greene, Kanye West, Nick Fuentes; Nick Fuentes’ past work with Ben Shapiro (Daily Wire: Matt Walsh, Candace Owens, Reagan Conrad). The group is said to be sponsored by PureTalk and connected to Dennis Prager or PragerU; PureTalk allegedly funds Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump Jr., and seventeen eighty nine capital involves Rebecca Mercer, Omid Malik, and Peter Thiel, with Robert Mercer behind Milo. - Tech, analytics, and think tanks: Cambridge Analytica, Palantir, SLC Group are named as Flynn being paid by; a dinner with Vladimir Putin and Jill Stein is cited; Erdogan and Reza Zorabh (Zorab) are mentioned; Flynn Intel Group, Fig Aviation, Fig Cyber (Tim Newberry) are named, with Fig Cyber run by Tim Newberry (White Canvas Group, Black Core Solutions) that receive Pentagon contracts. VizSense, Colt Ventures (Darren Blanton) involve John Iadanisi and Tim Newberry, with Iadanisi tied to the DOD. - Other affiliations: Flynn linked to Paul Manafort, who links to Donald Trump; Rudy Giuliani is noted as being on InfoWars; Mike Cernovich; Phyllis Schlafly (AEI), connected to the opioid crisis via Sally Seadle (working for Purdue Pharma, funded by the Sackler family); JD Vance’s connections to AEI and Sally Satel; references to IP three international activities around nuclear energy with Jared Kushner and Robert McFarlane; Derek Harvey connected to David Petraeus, US Central Command, and KKR; Keith Alexander from the NSA; Surrey Green Energy Center owning Dominion Energy and Green Energy Partners; Catas Cloud Solutions; Scott Jernigan (Oracle); UltraScale Digital Infrastructure; CloudSphere; Mission Critical Group; Heritage Foundation ties (Michael Flynn to Michael Ladine, Paul Vallely, Michael Aquino, noted as Church of Satan/Temple of Set connections). The speaker suggests these strands will expand, asserting that shadow box, Silent Partner, America’s Future, Eric Prince, Cambridge Analytica, and related elements are all connected. The closing remarks acknowledge ongoing mapping of the Michael Flynn network and anticipate further expansion.

We were covering an article about 55,000 Democrat NGOs discovered to be contributing to campaigns, moving things around, and pushing propaganda. It was discovered through AI that to figure out where the money's coming from, you have to go through layers and layers, and it's all funneling down to one group or another. It's a giant propaganda machine, a giant regime change machine.

The speaker connects Jeffrey Epstein to a broad web of influence and alleged illicit activity across several decades. Key points presented: - Epstein’s involvement is linked to the BCCI network, and to foreign policy activities in the Middle East during the 1990s, plus his alleged ties to high-level officials across Israeli, Saudi, British, and French governments, spanning the Clinton era into the early 2000s. - Epstein was investigated by the SEC in the 1980s and was one of the two people who ran the largest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history at that time, tied to the Towers Financial collapse. Epstein’s business partner went to jail for twenty-something years, while Epstein allegedly “skates completely free.” - He is said to have been involved in a billion-dollar fraud case in the U.S. Virgin Islands, with allegations that his campaigns funded local politicians there and that prosecutors answered to those politicians. - The speaker suggests Epstein’s pervasive presence—“always in the room” in four decades of American foreign policy and intelligence activity—implies a systemic concern about money sourcing for that activity. - Regarding Epstein’s crimes, the concern cited is the same one discussed with Orlando Massfer: don’t bring the case, and if you do, bring it in a highly limited way. - This culminated in the 2006 indictment, which was described as a “sweetheart plea deal” that limited prosecutions, protected coconspirators known and unknown, and allowed the case to proceed quickly before a full trial could uncover broader lines of evidence about Epstein’s network.

This transcript documents how high-level U.S. figures and members of the Trump family have intertwined political role, private business interests, and international dealings. - Jared Kushner, though not a formal government employee, participated in peace talks with Iran in Pakistan as part of a U.S. delegation led by Vice President J. D. Vance and Middle East envoy Steve Wittkoff, presenting himself as “a volunteer” rather than an official adviser. His full-time job is running Affinity Partners, a multibillion-dollar venture capital firm that has raised billions from the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. Kushner founded Affinity Partners in 2021 after leaving the White House. - Kushner maintained a close relationship with Mohammed bin Salman, and Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund invested $2 billion into Kushner’s fund after he left the administration. When Donald Trump returned to the White House in 2025, Kushner and Ivanka Trump did not return to Washington. Last summer, Kushner helped work on the war in Gaza, meeting regional leaders and brokered a peace agreement to end fighting and secure hostage releases. He and Wittkoff then traveled to Russia to meet President Vladimir Putin about a ceasefire in Ukraine. - In Davos, Switzerland, Kushner accompanied his father-in-law on a trip to the World Economic Forum. Regulatory filings show Affinity Partners reporting over $6.1 billion in assets, about 99% from non-U.S. investors, with most funds tied to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. Affinity Partners indicated it did not intend to take additional capital while Kushner volunteers for the government, but discussions with Saudi Arabia’s PIF were reported to be about raising new money. Democrats pressed the White House to explain potential conflicts of interest and whether Kushner’s influence benefited his private finances. - Kushner is not alone in expanding business interests; Don Jr. and Eric Trump have increasingly invested in various ventures. Since 2024, they have pursued interests in emerging technologies like cryptocurrency, and in drone technology, with at least three drone company investments. The latest deal involved PowerUS, a drone maker planning to merge with a golf-course holding company backed by the Trumps to create a new publicly traded company. PowerUS aims to develop military drones and pitch interceptors to Gulf nations to counter Iranian drone attacks, potentially aligning with Pentagon drone initiatives. - The Trumps’ business activities extend to nuclear fusion through a merger that would create one of the first publicly traded fusion companies, with PowerUS and other ventures positioning themselves to profit from a conflict environment. The Trump media group also plans to merge with TAE Technologies, a fusion power company valued at over $6 billion, with a plan to construct a utility-scale fusion plant later this year. Don Jr. has joined boards of four companies and advised six others since 2024, while Eric and Don Jr. are not government officials and are not subject to federal ethics rules or disclosure requirements. - Overall, the narrative underscores the rapid expansion of the Trump family’s private sector interests concurrent with geopolitical activity and policy-making, highlighting perceived gaps in ethics rules and potential conflicts of interest.