reSee.it - Related Video Feed

You are very welcome here in Downing Street. You have full backing across the United Kingdom. We stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes to achieve a lasting peace. Thank you very much, Prime Minister. I am happy to be here. Thank you to the people of the United Kingdom for your big support from the very beginning of this war. We in Ukraine are very happy that we have such friends. Thank you.

Good to see you, Prime Minister. Your support since the beginning of the war in Ukraine is greatly appreciated by the people of the United Kingdom. Thank you for your words and actions.

In the past two weeks, we've probably had more progress in ending this war than we have in the past three and a half years. And I think the fact that we're around this table today is is very much symbolic in the sense that it's team Europe and team United States helping Ukraine. And the progress that we're looking out of this meeting is about the security guarantees.

I was denounced by Boris Johnson as a tool of the Kremlin. He demanded $1,000,000 for an interview about Ukraine, which I refused. This is a shady money-making scheme that won't help Ukraine. Making money off war is immoral, and Boris Johnson is involved in it.

Our country needs a bigger reset, leaning towards Davos over Westminster for more meaningful engagement. Disappointed in the absence of the UK at Davos, emphasizing the importance of global participation. Acknowledging the influence of young leaders like Trudeau and the president of Argentina in shaping policies. Prioritizing serving the country over party politics. Davos is the preferred platform for collaboration. Translation: Our country needs a significant reset, preferring Davos over Westminster for more meaningful interactions. Disappointed by the UK's absence at Davos, highlighting the importance of global involvement. Recognizing the impact of young leaders like Trudeau and the president of Argentina in shaping policies. Emphasizing serving the country over party politics. Davos is the preferred setting for cooperation.

On Monday, June 17, 2024, a narrative centers on the Kingdom of the Netherlands with a company-like reference: overseas entity number OE miljoen 92714, registered May 11, 2023, at Rijnstraat 8, the address of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The managing officer is Hano Wirtner, identified as Deputy Ambassador UK, linked to the number ending in 714. The Foreign Affairs SG is Paul Huyts, who has attended the Multiconic Forum and is described as knowledgeable about the Sustainable Development Goals 2030 agenda; he previously served as coordinator of intelligence and security services and as Secretary-General of General Affairs. On May 29, Paul Huyts was appointed ambassador to the United Kingdom by the King. His successor is Christiaan Rebergen, described as Thesaurus-generaal and treasurer-general of the Ministry of Finance, who is said to be a 100 percent implementer of the Millennium Development Goals and the Sustainable Development Goals. The text asserts that both Huyts and Hano Wirtner are deeply involved in the described structure, with Wirtner in London as managing officer of the whole operation. The speaker raises explicit questions: Is the Kingdom of the Netherlands, as an overseas entity, written out of the Netherlands if registered elsewhere? Who approved this arrangement? What is the collateral and under what conditions is Hano Wirtner a straw man (stroomman)? The claim is made that as managing officer of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, this is a significant position, and that the Netherlands is an unidentifiable company (no known beneficial owner). The speaker asserts involvement of ABE Top Consults, all top Dutch civil servants, the Top Management Group, and intelligence and security services, including mentions of Gert-Jan Puytendijk and CTIVD officials, in relation to “what is going on.” The speaker announces a visit to Rijnstraat 8 to illustrate, noting the address as the overseas entity address and that Olh Huyts is the secretary-general of Foreign Affairs and former secretary-general of General Affairs, described as the coordinator of all intelligence and security services. It is stated that Paul Huyts is to become the new ambassador to the UK in London, that Huyts attended Davos for the World Economic Forum, and that a man (not identified by name) appears at the scene, possibly associated with ABD Top Consult or the Top Management Group. Further details describe Krissian Rebergen as the successor to Paul Huyts, serving as thesaurier-generaal and treasury-bearer of the Kingdom, and a 100 percent implementer of the MDGs and SDGs, with knowledge of the Millennium Development Goals. The structure is suggested to place Hano Wirtner in London as the managing officer, prompting questions about a potential straw man and absence of a known beneficial owner. The speaker remarks on the size of the Rijnstraat 8 building, its proximity to Den Haag Centraal Station, and questions about whether the Netherlands is effectively the “BV Nederland” housed in London, asking what is happening and calling for accountability. The account ends with the mention of Rijnstraat 8 as the building of Paul Huyts, described as the protector of Sandra Pellegrom, the coordinator of SDG Nederland.

Speaker 0: You are a busy man, and we're gonna let you go. You've got a lot to do, but we'll end on a quick fire because, obviously, we wouldn't be a podcaster without a quick fire. So, let us just ask you quickly. You have to choose now between Davos or Westminster. Speaker 1: Davos. Why? Because Westminster is too constrained, and, you know, it's closed, and we're not having meaning. Once you get out of Westminster, whether it's Davos or anywhere else, you actually engage with people that you can see working with in the future. Westminster is a tribal shouting place.

We outlined our green prosperity plan for clean power by 2030 at a conference. We aim to partner with businesses for this transition to renewable energy. It's crucial for the UK to be present on the global stage, especially in addressing the climate crisis. We believe in an active state that collaborates with the private sector to seize opportunities for the future. The absence of the UK at Davos was disappointing, and we hope for a change in government to lead in this area.

Speaker 0 argues that the BBC should not offer more than the apology already indicated by Samir Shah, who apologized for the error of joining two separate parts of an interview to look like one. He notes Donald Trump called the BBC corrupt and dishonest, which he finds outrageous. He believes Trump has a weak case and that the BBC’s error was editorial, similar to how written journalism uses ellipses; the program balance was not complained about at the time. He says the BBC should have corrected and apologized earlier, and that the BBC’s thoroughness can slow public relations. Speaker 1 asks whether Trump has a strong case. Speaker 0 responds that Trump does not; it was an editorial error, and the BBC should have used a visual cue to indicate the quote’s continuation. He suggests the error was serious and should have been corrected earlier, though he acknowledges the BBC makes errors as do all broadcasters. Speaker 1 asks if the two high-profile resignations were due to pressure from the American administration. Speaker 0 says no, expressing shock at Tim Davie’s resignation, praising Davie as the best person to navigate the BBC through charter renewal and public broadcasting challenges, and emphasizing the BBC’s commitment to impartiality. He contrasts this with populist right voices that interpret impartiality as broadcasting their views, noting the BBC makes errors but remains committed to impartiality. He maintains that the BBC is not institutionally biased and disputes the idea that the BBC is metropolitan, citing its Salford base and national reach. Speaker 1 asks if there is a BBC board coup or significant political interference. Speaker 0 is cautious about calling it a coup, citing examples of powerful figures like Robbie Gibb but avoiding naming individuals. He notes that non-executive directors were appointed under previous administrations and mentions involvement by a former Conservative Party leader who denounced the BBC and supported Robbie Gibb. He doubts that the intent is to destroy the BBC, but suspects some people want the BBC weakened and may hold strong views on license fees and the charter. He does not label it a coup. Speaker 1 asks how the BBC should move on, aside from Trump’s potential lawsuit. Speaker 0 says the BBC must apologize more promptly and publicly when wrong, especially in a fractured society where impartiality is crucial. He suggests the BBC should be on the front foot with apologies and even-handed treatment when treated unfairly. He questions who could lead the BBC in the coming months and stresses the need for balance and restored impartiality in judgment about the BBC’s performance and future.

The Alaska Summit reinforced my belief that while difficult pieces within reach, I believe that in a very significant step, President Putin agreed that Russia would accept security guarantees for Ukraine, and this is one of the key points that we need to consider. We're going to be considering that at the table, also, like who will do what, essentially. I'm optimistic that collectively we can reach an agreement.

We will reset with Europe, focus on climate and the global south, and shift towards delivering on European security, global security, and British growth. My story is one of progress, won by those who fought for a better future. Let's fight for a better future together. Change starts now.

The speaker is in Davos for the World Economic Forum. They mention the snowy weather and the unique experience of the event. The speaker has meetings with EU members to discuss a potential free trade agreement. They also have a panel discussion on measuring economic progress beyond GDP. The speaker has media interviews and participates in an informal gathering on global trade. They attend a panel on mental health with Prince William and meet someone working on mental health in Africa. The day ends with a dinner hosted by Google. The speaker mentions their jet lag and the cold weather. They express excitement about promoting New Zealand's interests and hope to share photos and updates later.

We are in Moscow to interview Russian President Vladimir Putin. The war in Ukraine has had significant global impacts, reshaping military alliances and the world economy. However, many English-speaking countries remain unaware of these changes due to corrupt and biased media outlets. While numerous interviews have been conducted with Ukrainian President Zelensky, no Western journalist has interviewed Putin. Americans have the right to know about a war they are involved in, and we have the right to inform them. Despite attempts to suppress this interview, it can be watched for free on our website. We encourage viewers to watch and make their own judgments.

Our country needs a bigger reset, a great reset. Choosing between Davos and Westminster, Davos is preferred for its openness and meaningful engagement. It's disappointing that the UK Prime Minister didn't attend Davos. It's crucial for the UK to be present on the global stage. The younger generation, like Prime Minister Trudeau and the President of Argentina, are making positive changes. My government prioritizes serving the country over party politics. Davos over Westminster. Translation: Our country needs a significant reset, a great reset. Choosing between Davos and Westminster, Davos is preferred for its openness and meaningful engagement. It's disappointing that the UK Prime Minister didn't attend Davos. It's crucial for the UK to be present on the global stage. The younger generation, like Prime Minister Trudeau and the President of Argentina, are making positive changes. My government prioritizes serving the country over party politics. Davos over Westminster.

In this video, the speaker meets with the president of Serbia, who shares his perspective on the war in Ukraine and its impact on the European economy. The president mentions that the destruction of Nord Stream by the Biden administration is affecting the German economy, which is the largest in Europe. He believes that this war is hurting everyone except Russia and is shifting power away from the United States and the West. Overall, the president's insights highlight the complex nature of the conflict and its global repercussions.

In 2025, Canada will chair the G7. The speaker is currently in Kyiv with Ursula and Antonio of the European Commission and Council. They have wanted peace and believe in it now more than ever.

Mario (Speaker 0) and the Ukrainian ambassador (Speaker 1) discuss a mix of domestic corruption allegations, high-stakes diplomacy, and battlefield realities shaping Ukraine’s path toward ending the war. - Corruption scandal in Ukraine: The ambassador notes the scandal involved two government members and another former member, not Zelenskyy personally. She says lessons have been learned: war does not justify turning a blind eye to corruption, and the president has instructed the government to maintain full control of the situation and meet commitments and expectations. She emphasizes that the silver lining is the independent National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) digging out the scandal, describing NABU as the positive development in this context. Zelenskyy’s response included calls for retirement of involved officials and a push for court hearings and convictions; he reportedly found it personally complex to accept the retirement of his long-time ally, Andriy Yermak, the head of the president’s office, but acknowledges the need for accountability and signals that further exposures would trigger similar actions. The ambassador stresses that all institutions must follow procedures and that the public pressure around the issue is especially painful as winter approaches. - Putin, NATO, and Ukraine’s diplomatic posture: The conversation turns to recent developments. President Putin’s comment after a meeting with the U.S. delegation—“we’ll take Donbas by force or by surrender”—is viewed as a signaling to the American side about Russia’s stance, with the ambassador noting limited progress from the Ukrainian delegation’s talks (Rostov Mumarov and Vipkov) and anticipating a fuller readout. The ambassador says Macron’s discussions with China and China’s involvement in Moscow at the same time as U.S. delegations signals China’s continuing engagement with both Russia and Western actors; China previously supported Russia’s war with material and financial backing, and the ambassador argues China’s presence in Moscow is natural given the broader geopolitics and the need to monitor unpredictable developments. - China and the broader strategic context: The ambassador explains that while Ukraine receives limited direct messaging from China, Beijing maintains dialogue with Russia, the United States, and European allies; China’s alignment with Russia was highlighted at the start of the large-scale invasion, with Xi Jinping and Putin signaling a “thousand-year partnership.” She notes Russia’s shift in narrative after Putin’s Alaska meeting with the U.S. president and suggests Chinese watchdogs in Moscow are a natural counterpoint to Western diplomacy. - The two major sticking points in negotiations: The ambassador notes that Russia presented a 28-point plan (narrowed to 20 points) focused on Donbas, with broader implications including security guarantees and the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO. She argues that it’s not productive to comment on each point in isolation since the Russian side uses a broader narrative that includes education of Ukrainian youth about anti-Western narratives. Ukraine is prepared to discuss a multi-layer solution: ceasefire, security guarantees, deterrence, and post-war political frameworks, while preserving sovereignty. - NATO and security guarantees: The ambassador contends security guarantees could be as strong as a NATO article-five framework, likening allied military actions to past operations conducted with partners. She distinguishes between the mere membership debate and practical security guarantees, asserting that Ukraine’s sovereignty remains paramount and that security guarantees are a meaningful path alongside potential NATO membership. - Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner’s roles: The ambassador describes a layered U.S. approach (Witkoff as special envoy with direct dialogue with Russia, Rubio coordinating with European allies and NATO officials, plus others like Daniel Driscoll and Candy Baker). She says these are not adversarial to diplomacy; rather, they form a structured process that could converge on a formal U.S.-Ukraine negotiation framework with eventual endorsement by the U.S. administration. - Pokrovsk and battlefield dynamics: The ambassador downplays the idea that Pokrovsk’s capture would decisively alter front-line dynamics, noting that the front experiences hundreds of engagements weekly. She acknowledges that Russia’s propaganda around Pokrovsk is designed to signal progress, but argues the reality is a broader battlefield picture with ongoing Ukrainian resilience. - Long-term strategic questions and sanctions: The ambassador reiterates bipartisan U.S. support for sanctions and designating Russia as a sponsor of terrorism, while acknowledging that enforceability is challenging and that Russia seeks time through delaying tactics. She emphasizes that Ukraine cannot rely on speed alone and must continue leveraging strikes on Russia’s energy and military infrastructure, including the so-called “shadow fleet” vessels, while avoiding direct strikes on civilians. - The Yermak corruption episode: The NABU-led investigation exposed the scandal; the president requested retirement for implicated officials and supported legal proceedings. The ambassador clarifies that there is no evidence implicating Zelenskyy himself, stressing the personal responsibility of the president and the need for transparent procedures moving forward, while maintaining that Yermak’s future role is subject to ongoing scrutiny. She notes media rumors (e.g., “golden toilets”) are not substantiated and emphasizes that Yermak has been sanctioned and that the government is pursuing accountability in a manner consistent with legal processes.

In this video, the speaker discusses the presence of Jewish leaders in modern Ukraine and how Western leaders often point out this fact when discussing Russia's involvement in Ukraine. The speaker questions the significance of having Jewish leaders in Ukraine and how it relates to the ongoing situation there.

BBC's Laura Kuensberg interviews Boris Johnson, who feels a duty to advocate for his beliefs after his role in Brexit. The interview appears staged, with comments suggesting a close relationship between the two. They joke about their interactions resembling a date and imply a past romantic encounter. The conversation is light-hearted but also hints at a deeper connection between them.

Thank you, Mr. President. I have a few questions for you. Is there a new deal in the works? What's the latest regarding the Brexit deal? President Zelensky, can you share any updates on what has transpired recently? Also, I'm wondering, did you sign the minerals deal? Did you sign the minerals deal? Did you sign the deal?

I am more encouraged about Ukraine's unity and resolve for 2024 and its strategic importance. I am also confident that Ukraine will have strong success this year, surprising Mr. Putin on the battlefield. Thank you.