reSee.it - Related Video Feed

You confirmed you were asked to obstruct justice? No, that’s not what I confirmed. The Mueller report clearly stated there was no collusion or obstruction. That’s not accurate. Did you read the report? No, I haven’t. Then how do you know? Congress members clarified it. I read the entire report, and it lists ten examples of obstruction. That’s not true. Here are the examples: asking Comey to drop the Flynn investigation, firing Comey, trying to remove Mueller, and influencing witnesses, among others. Legal experts agree these are obstruction. How can they determine that without knowing all the facts? The report outlines actions that would have led to charges for any citizen. Attorney General Barr and the deputy AG found no obstruction. A thousand former federal prosecutors, from both parties, stated there was evidence of obstruction that would have led to charges for a regular citizen.

There were clear violations of the Espionage Act, and Obama knew and approved of Hillary Clinton's use of a secret server because he was writing to her on it using an alias. On Anthony Weiner's laptop, there were 675,000 Clinton emails, including Clinton Foundation emails, her Secretary of State emails, and Huma Abedin's emails. These included the BlackBerry backup emails that they were supposedly looking for. When they found them on the Wiener laptop, they got a search warrant for things that didn't include the BlackBerry backup emails. The claim that they reviewed all the emails is false, as they specifically did not look at the BlackBerry backups or a fraction of the emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop. The speaker suggests demanding the Anthony Weiner laptop and having a trusted person in the military analyze it, believing there is a lot that can be prosecuted. The speaker heard that New York police officers who saw some of the contents of the laptop were disturbed.

There are some very suspect things about how the Hillary Clinton email investigation was handled. The fact that Loretta Lynch, who was the attorney general at the time, met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac right before Hillary had to speak with the FBI is definitely one of them. Also, Loretta Lynch told Jim Comey to publicly call this a matter, instead of a criminal investigation. These actions downplayed what Hillary Clinton had done while all the drama was being created around Donald Trump and the Russia collusion, which never materialized. What the American people are going to find out about the FBI is astonishing, especially the level of bias.

The FBI investigation of Secretary Clinton found 110 emails and 52 email chains containing classified information. Some of these chains were top secret and others were secret or contained confidential information. Secretary Clinton claims she did not send any classified materials and that nothing was marked as classified. The FBI concluded that there is no reason to bring a case against her.

During closed-door testimony, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page stated that the Obama administration's Justice Department advised the FBI against pursuing the gross negligence statute regarding Hillary Clinton's handling of classified information. Republican John Radcliffe questioned Page about statute 18 USC 793, with Page confirming the DOJ's stance. This testimony seemingly contradicts James Comey's 2016 recommendation against criminal charges for Clinton, where he assured the public of an honest, competent, and independent investigation, free from outside influence. According to the House committee's ranking Republican, the transcripts reveal a two-tiered system, suggesting preferential treatment for Hillary Clinton. A chart from the Clinton case, "mid-year exam," indicated the DOJ was "not willing to charge" gross negligence, noting its application primarily in military cases involving lost information. President Trump tweeted that the transcripts portray the Obama Justice Department as "a broken and corrupt machine." Page's testimony also confirmed that Russian collusion was unproven when Robert Mueller was appointed.

Hillary Clinton's emails on her unsecured personal server contained intelligence from the United States government's most secretive and highly classified operations called special access programs or SAPS. These are described as the crown jewels of the American intelligence community and the United States government. The intelligence community's inspector general, Charles McCullough III, notified congressional oversight committees on January 14 that a comprehensive review by the intelligence agencies found "several dozen emails containing classified information at the confidential secret and top secret / SAP levels," bringing new scrutiny to Clinton's handling of government secrets. If this information is compromised, there would be "very serious national security damage," with no mistake that it was not something you accidentally stumble across and not realize what it is. Access to these programs is highly restricted and on a need-to-know basis only. The State Department spokesman had not seen the letter but added that there are reviews and investigations going on about past email practices and he was not at liberty to discuss the content. The new findings are striking given Clinton's first public statement about her personal server: "There is no classified material. So I'm certainly well aware of the classification requirements." Court documents indicate former CIA director David Petraeus was prosecuted for sharing special access program intelligence with his biographer Paula Broadwell, and both Petraeus and then secretary of state Clinton were required to sign nondisclosure agreements promising to protect SAPs, with the understanding that a failure to do so has significant legal consequences. This is described as a real test for the administration to apply the law in a fair and equal way and treat Hillary Clinton the same way that David Petraeus was treated. A new email first obtained by The Daily Caller shows the State Department knew about Clinton's personal account as early as August 2011, with suggestions to use a government BlackBerry and a .gov account rejected by Clinton's aide, Huma Abedin. The Obama Justice Department allegedly ordered federal lawyers to do and not to do concerning the Hillary Clinton email investigation. During sworn testimony on Capitol Hill, one insider told lawmakers what she was told. In closed-door testimony last summer, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page said the Obama administration's Justice Department advised the FBI not to pursue the gross negligence statute for Hillary Clinton in the mishandling of classified information. Former US attorney and House Republican John Radcliffe led the questioning about the statute known as 18 U.S.C. 793. Page interrupted, stating, "That is correct." Page's testimony appears to conflict with then-FBI director James Comey's recommendation in July 2016 against criminal charges for Clinton. When asked what authorities could assure the American people, she said, "No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear." The Republican-led House Oversight and Judiciary Committee investigation ended in January. With Democrats now in control, the committee's new ranking Republican made the Page transcript public. The transcript reveals an inherent two-tier system, with Hillary Clinton receiving different treatment: "there was actually at first concerned that they were going to charge her and then with Loretta Lynch in charge before she recused herself, made it very clear that that was not going to happen." A tip from a chart drawn up by federal investigators for the Clinton case, known as the mid-year exam, listed possible federal statutes for prosecution. Next to gross negligence was a notation: "DOJ not willing to charge this." Only known cases are military cases when accused lost the information. In response to the Page revelations, the president tweeted that the transcripts would: "Make the Obama justice department look exactly like it was, a broken and corrupt machine." Page testified that "The nation cannot move forward unless people are held accountable," and referenced very senior people, saying, "you know who I'm talking about, I've said it many times. You know? It's the it's the you know, start with Obama and work your way down."

Nothing I sent or received was marked classified. I did not email classified material. However, there were classified emails sent. I never sent or received classified information at the time. I used my personal email for convenience, not realizing it would be an issue. I chose to turn over 55,000 pages of work-related emails, but 1,000 work-related emails were not returned. Claims about deleting emails after a subpoena are false. While my lawyers did not read every email individually, we went through a thorough process to identify work-related emails. Although there are potential violations regarding classified information handling, no reasonable prosecutor would bring a case. Regarding Donald Trump, there is enough evidence that any other person would likely have been indicted.

Clinton's use of a private server was motivated by concealment, not convenience, according to former US attorney Joe DeGeneva. The State Department repeatedly claimed there were no records of Clinton's emails, despite some officials knowing about her private server. Clinton never sought approval to use a private server for official business, and if she had, it would have been denied due to security risks. President Obama defended Clinton's actions, downplaying the importance of classified emails. The FBI's investigation into Clinton was criticized for its lack of integrity, with accusations that it was a political decision rather than a legitimate investigation.

675,000 Clinton emails, including those from the Clinton Foundation, Secretary of State, and Huma Abedin, were found on Anthony Weiner's laptop. If I were president, I would demand the laptop and have it examined by a trusted military expert. There is potential for prosecution based on the contents of the laptop. Some New York police officers who viewed it were so disturbed that they became physically ill.

Donald Trump is facing serious allegations regarding classified documents. If true, he had these documents inappropriately and failed to return them when given the chance. While it's possible to make mistakes with classified materials, once identified, they must be returned. This behavior is inconsistent with the responsibility of protecting U.S. military personnel. If the allegations hold, some of the documents in question are particularly significant, which raises further concerns about the situation.

"James Comey decided not to work through the FBI press office when he wanted to change the narrative in Washington, burnish his reputation, against attacks from Democrats, and try to sully Donald Trump's reputation." "my goal was to improve negative stories about James Comey and to set a narrative, I e, set the Russia collusion narrative." "it depends what the meaning of the word is." "these are documents that were never given to Jim Jordan." "most classified information statutes have a five year statute of limitations, but there is a provision that extends it to ten years if it's willing and knowing." "Tomorrow though, I think we're gonna take people on a new destination, which is how often did the FBI get blocked in trying to investigate Hillary Clinton corruption at the Clinton Foundation?"

Espionage Act very clear violations of the Espionage Act and really no issue about intent despite president Obama proclaiming otherwise. the reason that Hillary had to be protected was because he was writing her on that secret server using an alias. 675,000 Clinton emails when they got Anthony Weiner's laptop in a search warrant because of all his sex perversion issues. The, the golden emails because they were the BlackBerry backup emails that they were supposedly just looking for everywhere very diligently. They specifically did not look at the BlackBerry backups, and they didn't look at a fraction of the emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop. There's nothing there. There's a lot that can be prosecuted, I have no doubt, on that laptop.

I never sent or received classified information. Clinton's claim of no classified emails was false. She used multiple devices as secretary of state. Work-related emails were not all returned. Clinton did not delete work-related emails, but the email software was removed. Lawyers reviewed emails, and no reasonable prosecutor would indict. Trump may have obstructed justice according to Mueller's report.

The speaker believes that Hillary Clinton violated the Espionage Act and that President Obama was aware of it. They mention the Anthony Weiner laptop, which contained 675,000 Clinton emails, including those from the Clinton Foundation and Huma Abedin. The speaker accuses James Comey of lying when he said they had reviewed all the emails. They suggest that if they were the president, they would demand the laptop and have it thoroughly examined. They believe there is potential for prosecution based on the laptop's contents.

There are more documents to be declassified that will show how sinister the FBI was in amplifying Hillary Clinton's steel dossier as real and credible, and how they buried the counterintelligence referral memo. According to Speaker 1, he and FBI director Patel will be declassifying these additional documents. Speaker 1 stated that there is no Russia collusion hoax file cabinet at the FBI or CIA, and that they have to look for well-hidden documents by tracing through emails and looking for signs and clues. The Trump administration will continue to shed transparency, light, and truth because this was the greatest political scandal of our lifetime. It derailed the country and President Trump's first four years in office, and Donald Trump is committed to making sure it doesn't happen again.

I want to update you on the FBI's investigation of Secretary Clinton. I want to first tell you what we found. 110 emails, 52 email chains have been determined to contain classified information. Eight of those chains are top secret. 36 of those chains secret. And indeed contain confidential information. What difference, at this point, does it make? Everything I did was admitted. There was no law, no regulations. Secretary Clinton should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.

- Speaker 0 states they believe certain people are dishonest and crooked and that they may have to pay a price; they insist they are truly bad and dishonest people, and imply consequences may follow. - Speaker 1 discusses a criminal investigation into James Comey and John Brennan related to the so-called Russian collusion hoax, asserting they tried to ruin Trump’s life and that he prevailed. - Speaker 1 notes that for years, ranking members of Congress, the intelligence community, and the FBI claimed Donald Trump was colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election, and that this was continued through his first presidency. - Speaker 2 references emails suggesting Donald Trump Jr. was willing to collude with Russia, questioning how to know what happens when Trump and Putin meet, and suggests Trump’s repeated denials of collusion may have been truthful. - Speaker 3 asks if there has been any evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, and Speaker 2 disagrees, saying there is plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight. - Speaker 1 cites a recently declassified CIA “lessons learned” document from John Ratcliffe noting that the investigation was messed up, aimed at preventing Trump from winning and then hampering his agenda, and mentions multiple procedural anomalies in the preparation of the ICA (intelligence community assessment). - They walk through the timeline: Christopher Steele, a former MI-6 officer with Russian intel expertise, was hired by Fusion GPS, which was paid by Perkins Coie for Hillary Clinton’s campaign (notably Mark Elias) to produce opposition research on Trump; this unvetted dossier was used to bolster the case and was shopped to media to create a narrative of Trump-Russia ties, then used as a legal hook to push a narrative. - Speaker 1 argues Hillary Clinton leveraged influence to funnel the unverified dossier into the FBI and into a FISA warrant for Carter Page, noting it was not disclosed that the dossier was funded by Hillary Clinton, which they view as a major omission. - Ratcliffe’s document is cited as saying including the Steele dossier in the ICA undermined credibility and ran counter to tradecraft principles. - A second parallel element involved Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer paid by Fusion GPS and Clinton campaign, who met Don Jr. at Trump Tower; Don Jr. texted during the meeting that he was unsure what was happening, and the meeting was publicly used to support the Steele dossier claims about Trump’s ties to Russia. - The Speaker covers Hillary Clinton’s classified server issue, including the use of BleachBit and hammers, and notes DNC servers were hacked by Russia; they frame these events as being used to shift focus to Trump collusion. - They describe Crossfire Hurricane as the investigation into Trump, calling it an “insurance policy” to deflect attention from Clinton’s classified server issues and to portray Trump as guilty, describing the investigations into Trump associates (Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Manafort, Flynn) as efforts to keep the narrative alive even after Trump’s election victory. - Speaker 1 asserts Mueller’s appointment was scope-limited but later expanded, allowing broad access and substantial taxpayer cost; Brennan and Comey are accused of feeding initial information for a political purpose, with high-level agency involvement and misrepresentation in Congress. - They claim there was never any actual evidence of Russian collusion charged against the Trump campaign. - They mention Charles McGonigal, a former FBI counterintelligence official, as someone charged in connection with Russia, implying the broader narrative was invalid and asserting that those involved lied. - The speakers conclude that the entire setup was a scam and express a desire for accountability.

The transcript centers on multiple interwoven topics around Hillary Clinton’s private email server, Anthony Weiner, and a cascade of police suicides in New York. - The FBI reopened its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server after the Wall Street Journal reported that 650,000 emails were on Anthony Weiner’s laptop, with thousands potentially involving Clinton’s server. Weiner was married to Clinton aide Huma Abedin during Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state. The material is tied to the broader Clinton email probe, though the laptop’s relevance had not previously been established in the investigation. - Claims about how the Clinton emails were handled are asserted: that Clinton “bleached and deleted 33,000 emails after receiving a congressional subpoena.” The discussion emphasizes the potential significance of the Weiner laptop for Clinton’s emails and Abedin’s correspondence. - Anthony Weiner’s laptop is described as having kill switches and containing a large volume of material beyond the sexual messages he was known for. The discussion notes that Weiner’s case involved a minor, with an exclusive interview describing exchanges with a girl who was 15 years old at the time, as well as Weiner’s guilty plea to transferring obscene material to a minor. Abedin is described as connected to Clinton’s campaign at the time. - The narrative links the FBI’s renewed focus on Clinton’s emails to the discovery of emails on Weiner’s laptop, which allegedly included communications to and from Clinton’s private server. Inside Edition is cited as withholding the minor’s identity but presenting testimony about the exchanges. - Additional sensational claims are aired by various voices: assertions that the NYPD found state department emails and other damning information on the laptop, including allegations of money laundering and Hillary Clinton’s alleged visits to a site associated with Jeffrey Epstein. These statements claim that the material was shared with the FBI with threats to go public if indictments were not pursued. - There is a continued emphasis on the scale of the Clinton-related material found on the Weiner laptop: “hundreds of thousands of emails” were referenced, with the NYPD as the first to examine the drive. The discussion suggests that viewing the content caused strong reactions among investigators. - The transcript widens to a broader conspiracy framing: it mentions the supposed discovery of “insurance policy” files and alleged child sex-ring details involving high-ranking officials, claimed to be on the Weiner laptop, and rumors about copies made by NYPD leadership. Deputy Chief Steven Silks is mentioned as a high-ranking officer who reportedly oversaw evidence from the Weiner laptop and was later described as involved in related investigations; some sources allege he may have made copies of the data. - The dialogue also notes several NYPD suicides in the year, including officers who reportedly encountered the Weiner laptop’s contents, with one speaker asserting that nine or ten officers who saw the laptop have died, though others dispute the numbers. The discussion compares these deaths to other high-profile events and suggests a pattern of disappearances or suicides among officials connected to the laptop’s contents. - Throughout, multiple participants imply that the Weiner laptop contains explosive material linking Clinton, her aides, and Democratic figures to criminal activity, and they discuss the political impact of the investigation on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 election campaign.

During closed-door testimony, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page stated that the Obama administration's Justice Department advised the FBI against pursuing the gross negligence statute regarding Hillary Clinton's handling of classified information. Republican John Radcliffe questioned Page about statute 18 USC 793, with Page confirming the DOJ's stance. This testimony seemingly contradicts James Comey's 2016 recommendation against criminal charges for Clinton, where he assured the public of an honest, competent, and independent investigation without outside influence. A chart from the Clinton case, "mid-year exam," listed possible federal statutes for prosecution, noting that the DOJ was "not willing to charge" gross negligence, citing military cases where the accused lost information as the only known precedents. President Trump tweeted that the transcripts make the Obama Justice Department look like a "broken and corrupt machine." Page's testimony also confirmed that Russia collusion was unproven when Robert Mueller was appointed.

A new statute was proposed to make it a misdemeanor to knowingly take classified information from secure systems. Our investigation also looked into possible computer intrusions by nation states or hostile actors. It's important to note that Secretary Clinton used multiple servers and administrators during her time at the state department.

"Ultimately, all we can do at the FBI is make sure that we stay focused on doing the work in the right way, following our rules and not letting preferences, partisan or otherwise, drive or taint the approach." "A Trump lawyer certified that all classified papers had been returned to the government, but the FBI said later it found 72 documents marked top secret or secret, at least one about US military strength." "I haven't had any interaction with the Biden White House, about investigations into the former president." "This is a hard job. You're inevitably going to make different people angry, often very powerful people. But part of the essence of the rule of law is to make sure that facts and the law and proper predication drive investigations. Not who's in power, not who wants it to be so or not so"

During closed-door testimony, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page stated that the Obama administration's Justice Department advised the FBI against pursuing the gross negligence statute regarding Hillary Clinton's handling of classified information. This testimony seemingly contradicts James Comey's 2016 recommendation against criminal charges. According to released transcripts, there were concerns about charging Clinton initially. However, under Loretta Lynch's leadership, it became clear that charges wouldn't be pursued. A chart by federal investigators listed possible statutes, but next to gross negligence was a note that the DOJ was "not willing to charge this," except in military cases where information was lost. President Trump tweeted that the transcripts show the Obama Justice Department was "a broken and corrupt machine." Page's testimony also confirmed that Russian collusion was unproven when Robert Mueller was appointed.

There were clear violations of the Espionage Act, contrary to President Obama's claims. Hillary Clinton's use of a secret server was known and approved, as evidenced by communications from an alias. The discovery of 675,000 Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop, linked to various individuals including Huma Abedin, raises serious concerns. The FBI's claims of reviewing all emails were misleading; they did not examine the BlackBerry backup emails or many others on the laptop. If in a position of power, I would demand access to the Weiner laptop for thorough investigation, as it likely contains prosecutable material. Reports suggest that even experienced investigators were disturbed by what they found.

Weed through a complete searchable database of 26,000 files related to Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker has spent hours and hours examining these files and will spend the coming days giving an inside look at them. A taste of the range of materials includes bizarre emails where Epstein is suspiciously dumping lists of names, including Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew, and Woody Allen. There are emails over the years in which Epstein works with outside consultants to scrub Google search results and essentially bleach the Internet of bad press, claiming they can provide reinforcement from sites like Harvard and other publications they influence to meet Epstein’s needs. In another email, Epstein and Larry Summers, the former Harvard president and board member for OpenAI, are emailing about an article involving Donald Trump and Bill Clinton. Epstein mysteriously says he has some great stories after just coming back from a week of “Jeffrey style” meetings. There are also many emails related to Trump. Despite Trump’s public claim that the whole affair is a scam—with arrows pointing to the Democrats—the files show that he is mentioned in these emails more than anyone else. The speaker invites audiences to follow along as these files are examined and to work to hold everyone involved accountable.

The Anthony Weiner laptop contained 675,000 Clinton emails, including those from her time as Secretary of State and communications with Huma Abedin. When the FBI searched the laptop, they overlooked the critical BlackBerry backup emails, which Comey referred to as the "golden emails." They claimed to have reviewed all emails, but this was misleading. If in a position of power, I would demand access to the laptop and have a trusted military official analyze its contents, as there are likely prosecutable offenses within. Reports suggest that even experienced investigators were disturbed by what they found on the device.