reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A speaker warns that something very serious is happening in Canada related to Alberta’s push for independence. He says rumors from private conversations indicate discussions about how far the federal government will go to prevent Alberta from separating, noting that actions against protesters—bank account freezes, jailing, and emergency powers—have occurred in the past, implying they could be used against a province seeking independence. He adds that, concurrently, there is quiet military movement and exercises increasing in Alberta. Speaker 1 reports that the Canadian Forces base at Suffield, Alberta will see increased activity this summer, with larger base size and infrastructure drawing renewed interest for military use, suggesting a coincidence with Alberta’s referendum timing. He also mentions claims of a foreign security presence from China in Alberta’s oil patch with heavily armed guards, tying this to federal pressure, military movement, and foreign influence in the same region as the independence push. Speaker 2 provides an update on the Stay Free Alberta petition, noting 178,000 signatures collected—enough to trigger a referendum. An Alberta judge paused the signature validation process after three First Nations challenged it as infringing treaty rights. The pause affects what comes after collection, not the collection itself. Petitioners must submit signatures by May 2 for Elections Alberta validation. After failed mediation, the judge ordered a one-month pause while she decides whether to shut down the petition altogether. Courts have already blocked delivery of petition signatures, indicating the process is being slowed or obstructed. The speaker asks what happens if the vote cannot proceed but pressure continues, and mentions a looming court challenge and possible injunction that could restrict canvassing rights. Speaker 3 echoes concern about the campaign, urging supporters to keep collecting signatures as if the future of children and grandchildren depend on it, despite uncertainties about legal obstacles and potential injunctions. He discusses alleged internal communications from a private visit, where Mark Carney was reportedly asked what he would do if Alberta moved toward independence. He recounts an alleged message from a Stelco employee claiming Carney answered that there will be no Alberta independence because he would invoke the Emergencies Act. The claim is presented as an unreported allegation from a private source, not mainstream media. A speaker identifies the incident as a pivotal element that would move beyond politics into enforceable power, implying implications beyond Canada. Speaker 4 notes Alberta’s resource wealth and the strategic interest of the United States, suggesting Alberta could be a valuable partner for energy trade. The discussion touches on the possibility of Alberta voting on independence and the broader geopolitical attention this situation attracts. The overall message emphasizes internal pressures, legal challenges, military and foreign dimensions, and alleged statements about invoking emergency powers in response to Alberta’s independence movement, with ongoing updates and calls for continued public action.

The speakers discuss a contract between Pfizer and Canada regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. They claim that the contract reveals that the government knew the vaccine's safety and efficacy were unknown and that adverse effects were possible. They criticize Trudeau for distancing himself from the contract and accuse the government of lying and covering up the truth. The speakers also mention that the contract lacks anti-bribery and anti-corruption sections and highlight concerns about the vaccine's potential risks and uncertainties. They express their belief that the government's actions are criminal and express a desire to hold them accountable.

The speakers discuss their concerns about the current state of Canada. They criticize the government's actions, such as labeling truckers as racist and misogynist and closing down bank accounts of those who donated to the trucker movement. They also mention the ban on accessing news outlets from outside of Canada and the potential impact on creators on social media platforms. They express worry that their podcast may not be available in Canada due to their criticism of the government. Overall, they feel that Canada is sliding towards communism and becoming like a dictatorship.

According to Speaker 0, Canada's new prime minister threatened to seize capital from companies not advancing Canada's climate agenda. Speaker 1 stated the goal is for every financial decision to consider climate change, backing companies that are part of the solution and taking capital away from those who are part of the problem. Speaker 0 claims the prime minister is a fan of censorship and threatened American social media platforms, referencing a statement by Speaker 1 that large American online platforms have become seas of hate and are being used by criminals to harm children, and that his government will act. Speaker 0 asserts there is no free speech in Canada and that the prime minister wants to ban social media platforms, shut down dissent, and use the climate crisis as an excuse to steal from businesses and control their means of production. Speaker 0 concludes that while the friendship between the US and Canada will continue, the "free ride" is over.

The speakers discuss a dangerous and divided world, citing threats from Iran, Russia, and China, as well as changing security and commercial relationships with the United States. One speaker mentions having obtained top secret security clearance within three weeks to be informed and make decisions. He then points out that another speaker has refused the opportunity to obtain top secret security clearance for 950 days. The other speaker explains that while he previously held top secret clearance as a minister, he refused the recent offer because it would have gagged him under security law, preventing him from speaking freely about foreign interference without fear of prosecution. He claims Canada has experienced Chinese interference in two elections. He says that refusing the clearance allowed him to speak freely about issues such as a candidate who allegedly threatened a political opponent, and a quarter billion dollar loan obtained in China. The first speaker responds that robust debate has occurred despite the situation, and observes that China is not the only country accused of foreign interference.

The exchange centers on content posted online to the Department of State of Canada and the implications of that content. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about what she posted and asks for a screenshot to verify the online statements. Speaker 1 asserts that she referred to someone as “a Zionist scumbag” and says “he's not my prime minister,” adding, “But really, you're gonna come to my door and you're worried that I'm going to do something.” Speaker 0 notes that there were “threats” and explains the purpose of the visit: to address such threats, which could lead to consequences if continued. Speaker 1 responds that the focus should be on “actual real crime” rather than harassing her over online remarks, and argues that the visit is a waste of tax dollars. Speaker 0 warns that if the behavior continues, there could be an arrest and charge, stating, “if you made some threats that are concerning… you could be arrested and charged.” Speaker 1 demands to see what she allegedly said, asking, “Show me what I said,” and accuses the interaction of harassment and harassment for expressing dissent about the prime minister. The dialogue touches on the nature of the statements. Speaker 1 repeats hostility toward the prime minister and labels the act as “harassing people for what they say online because I don't like our stupid prime minister, and he's a Zionist sunbag,” while Speaker 0 reiterates the right to express opinion but cautions against threats. The conversation escalates with Speaker 1 calling the environment “Communist Canada” and questioning the officers’ pride in their work, challenging, “How do you like working for that?… Do you go back home and look at your family in the mirror and say, this is what you do for a living?” Speaker 0 emphasizes the possibility of documenting the behavior and filing a report if the conduct continues, with a vague reference to “the Trump Blah blah blah blah blah.” Speaker 1 maintains, “I will say whatever the fuck I want about our prime minister. You can't stop my speech. Sorry. Opinion. Yeah. Exactly.” The dialogue ends with Speaker 1 stating, “Okay. Have a nice day. Goodbye now,” and Speaker 0 reiterating the threat assessment: “Be threatening. That's all I'm asking you.”

The speaker discusses the lack of transparency in government actions, mentioning secretive partnerships and asymmetry of information. They question collaborations with China on sensitive research and criticize institutions like universities and newspapers for failing to provide accurate information to the public. The conversation highlights concerns about hidden agendas and power dynamics at play behind the scenes.

Speaker 0 accuses Mr. Trudeau of selling out Canada to globalism and working for his globalist partners instead of the country. The speaker questions how much Mr. Trudeau is being paid to betray Canada and suggests that traitors used to be hanged for treason. The speaker mentions that they know what Mr. Trudeau is doing and brings up the topic of oil.

The speaker expresses disbelief that the government has enrolled in the known traveler digital ID program with the World Economic Forum. They believe the government tries to make people feel embarrassed for questioning their actions. They mention that Justin Trudeau spoke about resetting and reimagining the future after COVID, but then denies any conspiracy when questioned about it. The speaker doesn't care about being labeled a conspiracy theorist and is determined to save their country and inform others. They will continue to speak out and provide information to Canadians about the government's plans.

In this video, a member of parliament raises concerns about outside interference in democracy. They mention Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum (WEF), claiming that the WEF has infiltrated governments worldwide, including Canada's cabinet. The member asks for transparency regarding which cabinet ministers support the WEF's agenda. However, due to poor audio and video quality, the member's question is not fully understood. Another member accuses them of promoting disinformation. Speaker 1 then proudly mentions young leaders like Prime Minister Trudeau and President of Argentina, suggesting that they have influence over cabinet members. The video ends without further elaboration.

A woman yelled at the speaker, accusing them of implanting things in her and tracking her. The speaker is surprised by the misinformation and the difficulty in trusting the government and collaborating with it. They advise the younger generation to pay attention to and reverse these trends, emphasizing their importance.

Constable Ryan Davidson from the Integrated National Security Enforcement Team addresses a post made by the speaker regarding Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The speaker denies making threats and claims to seek a lawful remedy for what they perceive as a criminal conspiracy with the Communist Party of China. They express concern for the well-being of citizens and offer their services to authorities for a conversation about the issues. The speaker questions the government's transparency, mentioning Jagmeet Singh's alleged ties to terrorism and the lack of clarity regarding money allocation. They emphasize the need for investigation and express willingness to contribute as a concerned citizen.

The speaker claims that every Canadian prime minister has been compromised by agents of influence working for Chinese intelligence. This poses a significant security risk, raising concerns about who is truly in control of the country. They suggest the need for an independent investigation to protect against future threats, citing Australia's law against foreign interference as a model to follow.

The speaker asserts that the Canadian government has committed an atrocity, stating, "That's your Canadian government right there... The government has committed their own fucking atrocity at this Canadian government." They recount having served in Bosnia, Somalia, and Afghanistan, and declare, "I did not fucking serve my country for this bullshit that's fucking in front of us." The speaker emphasizes that the government is responsible for the current situation.

The speaker criticizes the use of the term "conspiracy theory" as a way for politicians to avoid answering questions. They mention a United Nations program that encourages reporting conspiracy theories to editors, which they see as a form of bullying. The speaker, who has a PhD, emphasizes the importance of knowledge and documentation. They provide an example of the government's enrollment in a program called the known traveler digital ID program. The speaker believes that the government tries to make people feel embarrassed for questioning their actions. They mention Justin Trudeau's statement about resetting and reimagining the future after COVID, which some labeled as a conspiracy. The speaker is determined to save their country and inform Canadians about the government's plans. They are not concerned about being labeled a conspiracy theorist.

The speaker from Halton Hills accuses the government of neglecting national security, citing documents that show collaboration between Canadian government employees and Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's claim that no sensitive information left the country is contradicted by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still supports those comments. Translation: The speaker criticizes the government for ignoring national security concerns and collaborating with Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's statement that no sensitive information left the country is disputed by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still stands by those remarks.

Speaker 0 states this is the most important election in most of their lifetimes. They claim Trump has made unacceptable threats against the economy, workers, and sovereignty. They believe a particular leader can address these issues and needs support. Speaker 1 accuses Catherine McKenna of losing track of 20,000 contracts worth $236,000,000,000, which they claim is why she is no longer in parliament. Speaker 1 repeats the accusation and insults Speaker 0. Speaker 1 continues to harass Catherine, repeating the $236,000,000,000 figure and using abusive language. Speaker 1 then states that everyone is "fucking retarded."

The speaker condemns the Canadian government, saying, "That's your Canadian government right there that just did this." They note, "I went to Bosnia, Somalia, and Afghanistan, and I did not fucking serve my country for this bullshit that's fucking in front of us." They add, "Right? The government has committed their own."

The speaker discusses Canada becoming interesting in January and February due to protesters in Ottawa. The job of reporters, according to the speaker, is to go out and ask protesters why they are on the streets, why they are there with their kids, and why there is a bouncy castle in the middle of Ottawa, to discover the story. The speaker claims the Government did not want that and that the Prime Minister decided in advance that the protesters were all the modern excommunications—Nazis, white supremacists, anti-Semites, probably homophobes, misogynists, probably transphobes, etc.—and then he brings in the Emergency Powers Act. The speaker asks what the mainstream media would do at such a time, and asserts they would question it, but claims the Canadian mainstream media did not and instead acted as an Amen Chorus of the government. Several examples are provided. A CBC host described the Freedom Convoy as a feral mob. A Toronto Star columnist said, “sorry for the language, it's a homegrown hate farm that was then jet fueled by an American right funded rat fucking operation.” The speaker notes that CBC claimed two indigenous women who were scared to go outside in Ottawa because of racist violence did not bother to mention that indigenous drummers had led the truckers in an 0 Canada rendition. The National Observer allegedly stated that many black and indigenous freedom convoy supporters were, in fact, duped by the truckers. A Globe and Mail reporter claimed, “My 13 year old son told me to tell protesters I'm not a Jew” out of fear of antisemitic violence, without mentioning that one of the convoy leaders was Jewish. The speaker argues this demonstrably rancid and corrupt behavior is rooted in a system where in Canada, the media is funded by the government. It is stated that in 2018, election year, there was a coincidence with the government funding; the Canadian media allegedly received $595,000,000 over five years, and the Toronto Star estimated it was going to be getting $3,000,000 from the Government in the first half of the year. The government is described as able to tell banks to shut down people’s bank accounts, and able to tell the media what to do, with the media then doing the bidding of the government camp. The speaker concludes that this is not a free society’s media.

The speaker expresses fear and frustration about the influence of the United Nations and what they perceive as dirty politics. They criticize the lack of support for certain groups like drag queens, Black Lives Matter, and Antifa, while freedom-loving people are being silenced. The speaker questions why being political is seen as a problem and suggests that democracy is being eroded, leading to tyranny and a path towards communism. They warn against aligning with the United Nations, calling it an evil corporation, and urge Canadians to stand up and resist.

The speaker condemns the current actions of the Canadian government, asserting that “that’s your Canadian government right there that just did this.” They remind the audience that they themselves served in Bosnia, Somalia, and Afghanistan, and they state that they did not serve their country for “this bullshit that’s fucking in front of us.” They emphasize agreement with the sentiment by asking, “Right?” and then assert that “the government has committed their own fucking atrocity at this Canadian government.” The speaker reiterates the point with “Right?” signaling concurrence and emphasis on the perceived atrocity by the government.

The speaker, Ryan Davidson, is being questioned by an Integrated National Security Enforcement Team about his online posts regarding Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Davidson claims he is seeking a lawful remedy for what he perceives as a criminal conspiracy with the Communist Party of China. He expresses concerns about the well-being of citizens and offers to contribute to investigations. Davidson criticizes Trudeau's government and accuses him of being propped up by a terrorist. He calls for an independent civilian to oversee the RCMP investigation. The security team warns Davidson about making inflammatory statements and confirms that they have no interest in stifling his speech. Davidson insists on continuing to voice his opinions until the issues are resolved.

The speaker claims that not only the current government, but all previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe it took so long for this information to come out because of partisan politics and the influence of Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised, posing a significant security risk for Canadians. They suggest the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws similar to Australia's 2017 law against foreign interference to protect the country's future.

The speaker claims that both the current and previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe there are two reasons for this delay: partisan interests and infiltration by Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised by these agents. This poses a significant security risk for Canadians, as it raises questions about who is really in control of the country. The speaker suggests the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws, similar to those in Australia, to protect against foreign interference.

The speaker asks questions about pregnancy outcomes and the Liberal government platform. They discuss the CBC's income sources, suspecting hidden government funding. The conversation also touches on pharmaceutical advertising differences between Canada and the US. The speaker criticizes CBC reporters for not covering the National Citizens Inquiry, suggesting they are avoiding facing the truth.