TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims the Zionists in London cabled Justice Brandeis to influence President Wilson to get the U.S. into World War I, despite the U.S. having no reason to be involved. The speaker asserts the U.S. was "railroaded" into the war so Zionists could obtain Palestine, a fact allegedly hidden from the American people. After the U.S. entered the war, Zionists allegedly sought written confirmation from Great Britain regarding Palestine, resulting in the Balfour Declaration. The speaker characterizes the Balfour Declaration as a "receipt" and a promise to pay the Zionists for getting the U.S. into the war, labeling it as "phony as a $3 bill." The speaker concludes that this is where all the trouble started.

The speaker claims Winston Churchill's mother was Jewish and that Churchill was financed by a secret group called The Focus, primarily composed of Jewish industrialists and bankers, from 1936 onward. This group allegedly influenced Churchill to adopt an anti-Nazi stance, leading to his rise to Prime Minister and Britain's involvement in a war that was not in its best interest. The speaker suggests Britain should have allowed Poland and the Jews to resolve their issues with Germany independently. He cites a letter from Chaim Weizmann to Churchill in 1941, stating that Zionist support for the British cause and their ability to bring the United States into the war were contingent on the creation of a Jewish army in the Middle East. The speaker asserts that Churchill became a "gentile frontman" for Jewish interests, naming Robert Monde, Robert Valley Cohen, and Berna Baruch as examples. He also claims Neville Chamberlain believed American and world Jews forced England into the war. The speaker quotes the Jewish magazine Sentinel of Chicago as stating that the war was brought about by Jews. Churchill allegedly rejected peace offers from Germany, even when Britain was isolated, as confirmed in a letter to Stalin.

Before 1914, Germany and Russia prevented Jewish world mastery because they weren't fully under Jewish control, unlike Western democracies. Germans and Russians had scorn for Jews, posing a threat of a leader like Frederick the Great. To counter this, the speaker claims the Jews pushed to overthrow monarchies, disguising it as a call for a sovereign people. The speaker alleges that Germany's guilt in WWI was failing to organize a strong enough defense to deter attacks or ensure victory. The speaker claims that in 1912, the Reichstag's refusal to raise three army corps, influenced by "democratic Marxist Jews," led to Germany's defeat. The speaker asserts that these same individuals disarmed Germany while inciting other nations to arm themselves. The speaker calls for recognition of the war's causes, labeling those responsible as "November criminals" who betrayed Germany. The speaker advocates for their execution. The speaker concludes by stating that honoring the sacrifices of those lost in the war requires building a new Germany.

I believe that without the Jewish international press and propaganda incitement, peace among nations would be quickly achieved. Attempts to provoke war and tarnish our relationship with the United States are fueled by political and financial interests. If another world war were to occur, it would result in the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe. This is not just a struggle for German freedom and security, but a battle for the future of Europe and the entire civilized Western world. Translation: The speaker discusses the impact of Jewish international press and propaganda on peace efforts, as well as the potential consequences of another world war on the Jewish race in Europe. The conflict is portrayed as not just a German struggle, but a battle for the future of Europe and the civilized Western world.

Speaker cites Diana West's "self revisionist history of World War II" and says "the story we got about World War II is all wrong." He states "FDR's right hand man was a Soviet spy." He argues "we should have sided with Hitler and fought Stalin" (Patton said that) and that "Stalin was awful by any metric and we weren't his ally." He claims "There were a few missing American soldiers at the end of World War II in Russian territory. 15 to 20,000 were missing and we left them there." On Pearl Harbor: "we knew [it] would be attacked" and "the right hand man" was "okay with that" because "he was a Soviet spy." Finally, on the Great Depression: "every single penny he spent... the forgotten man... bought votes" "He was a sociopath" "a compulsive liar" and "his inner circle had to constantly cover for his lying."

During World War II, the Soviet Union was a military ally whose anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted and later integrated into historical accounts. One speaker states their belief that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. They then ask another speaker, the president of Iran and a scholar, if he believes that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or if he thinks that is not true. The other speaker says he doesn't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed, and cautions that this statement is against the law in Germany, and could result in imprisonment.

You know what they told me? Exactly. They said, when the Holocaust happened, we allowed them to come because they were facing pain, and we wanted to make sure they had a safe place where they were safe. In nineteen o five, the Jews went to Russia to try to kill the czar. They weren't fleeing persecution. They were fearing justice. The Germans let them in in nineteen o five in mass numbers fleeing Russia. The Jews financed by Wall Street, go in and try to kill the Russian head. We'll bring America into the war. It's the Balfour Declaration. Right? They had won the war. It was really over. The Jews took over. It wasn't about getting Palestine. That wasn't it. Yeah. And it wasn't theirs to give.

Speaker 0: 6,000,000 number used lot many times before World War two by, like, newspapers. Is that true? I've seen that mentioned quite a bit with that being used. Speaker 1: If you wanna read up all on this, it's volume six of the Holocaust Hangposts here. It's the first Holocaust. Talks about all the many times that, particularly, New York Times was good at it, as I call it, the New York Times because it's owned and run by Jews. They were propagating the 6,000,000 number, and they were using first, the term Holocaust already during the czarist time in Russia before the first world war. 6,000,000 Jews are threatened. 6,000,000 Jews are dying. They're threatened by a holocaust. It goes into the first world war after the first world war with the Bolshevik revolution, the New York Times, the Jewish community in The United States to a large degree supporting the Bolshevist revolution, which was mainly a a Jewish supported revolution. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: then you if that revolution collapses, the Jews are facing countrywide pogroms that would potentially wipe them out. So they knew it's either the the Bolshevik, revolution succeeds or we're gonna have a holocaust. And they were talking about that, in this context. When you support the Jews, 6,000,000 are about to die and so forth. It goes on. There is a straight line going from the eighteen eighties into the second world war Killing final five. 6,000,000 Jews are dying or threatened or being killed. So it's nothing new. The area, Russia, Poland, Germany has changed. The the villain, the czar, the white anti Bolshevik civil war people, or then Hitler and his acronies. Speaker 0: So what you’re saying is that— Speaker 1: So the ingredients to the story have changed, but not the story in general.

Oswald claims he was never anti-Semitic, defining it as attacking Jews based on race or religion. His quarrel was with some Jews who he believed were provoking a second World War to aid their co-religionists in Germany. He felt a minority shouldn't dictate policy against national interest, resulting in 50 million deaths. He defends calling hecklers "sweepings of the ghetto" as a rough response to foreigners disrupting an English meeting. He argues his arguments would not have been better addressed to Hitler, whose policy was different from his own. Looking back, Oswald blames both Hitler and Jews for World War II. He says Hitler was impatient to unite Germans eastward, while some Jews influenced Britain to guarantee Poland, which led to war. He claims he never wanted to persecute Jews, only defended his meetings from Jewish attacks. He describes the Olympia meeting where people marched from East London to disrupt it, leading to fighting and cinema lights being turned onto the audience.

During World War I, Germany had the upper hand and offered England a negotiated peace. However, the Zionists in Germany made a deal with the British war cabinet, promising to bring the United States into the war as an ally in exchange for Palestine. The United States, influenced by pro-German Jews, entered the war. After the war, the Balfour Declaration promised Palestine to the Zionists as a reward for their help. The Germans felt betrayed by the Jews, who they had treated well before. The Jews declared a boycott against Germany, leading to tensions. The speaker believes that the Jews were responsible for both World War I and II, and that Germany saw the war as a fight between Christianity and communism.

The speakers present a nationalist and xenophobic framing of national interest and ethnic conflict. The first speaker argues that “The German nation does not wish its interest to be determined and controlled by any foreign nation,” listing France, England, and America—repeatedly emphasizing different nations as external controllers. He states, “This … we are resolved to prevent the settlement in our country of a strange people which was capable of snatching for itself all the leading positions in the land and to oust it.” A second portion asserts that “This is all done on purpose. None of this is an accident,” claiming that “what they do is they construct as many divisions amongst the peasants as possible.” He describes attempts to inflame societal tensions by promoting division: “Make sure the blacks hate the whites. Men hate the women by promoting degeneracy in the whole month of June.” He adds, “Republicans hate the Democrats,” and that people are “so busy fighting with each other they can laugh from the talk.” The first speaker then shifts to a statement about historical anti-Jewish policy, claiming, “Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews at the time. He wanted to expel the Jews.” He asserts, “For Europe cannot settle down until the Jewish question is cleared up.” He concludes with a call to collective action: “Workers of all classes and of all nations, recognize your common enemy.” The dialogue ends with a reframing of political conflict: “It's not right versus left. It's about right versus wrong.” Throughout, the speakers articulate a conspiracy-theory style narrative centered on foreign influence, ethnic and racial antagonism, and the alleged manipulation of social divisions to achieve political ends.

Speaker 1 argues there is a political revolution underway, stating: "The Germans have been on the national apology tour for eighty years, apologizing to everyone in sight for all the terrible evil things they did and for, quote, unquote, starting the second World War." He adds: "The truth is the Germans did not start the second World War." He claims: "Everything that happened in Germany was a reaction to communism, Bolshevism in Russia, the emergence of Stalin's Russia, and the fear of communism, and the mass murder programs in the Soviet Union and the interwar years." He notes: "The Germans and they're not the only ones. Virtually all the Europeans were horrified by it." He contends this is the phony narrative that was created, that this happened exclusively in a vacuum, that Hitler woke up and decided to start a world war, and calls it "phony" and "misleading" and "fundamentally wrong." He concludes: "The Germans need to put an end to the apology tour." He adds: "Perhaps they will because it's gotten them into this position they are now." "They are now a nation living on on the precipice of poverty and destruction."

Speaker 0 urges historical perspective, noting the wartime Soviet alliance and that their anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted by the Allies; as victors, the Soviets "got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact." He says current knowledge of Stalin's despotism and the KGB's deception, and the camps Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, have required relying on Soviet sources. "I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis." He asks Speaker 2 if he believes that figure. Speaker 2 replies, "But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany."

Speaker 0 states that the left wants to destroy Western culture and promotes racism against whites to condition people. Speaker 1 agrees, adding that the Republican party has been taken over by Jewish communists. He claims his book proves the communist movement was overwhelmingly Jewish, naming Leon Trotsky and Lenin as examples. He says Jewish people took over communism and capitalism. Speaker 1 references Winston Churchill's article "Zionism versus Bolshevism," claiming Churchill said Jewish communists gripped the Russian people. Speaker 0 acknowledges Jewish leaders in the Bolshevik takeover but notes Stalin's later purge. Speaker 1 claims Stalin removed Jews from the intelligence apparatus and Politburo, leading to the Cold War. He says Jewish oligarchs took over Russia's resources under Yeltsin.

"I almost don't know these Jews." "Yeah. I saw what happened in Palestine." "In nineteen o five, the Jews went to Russia to try to kill the czar." "When the Russians found out what happened, they stopped them and put them out." "The Germans let them in in nineteen o five in mass numbers fleeing Russia." "They weren't fleeing persecution. They were fearing justice." "They tried to kill the czar." "The Germans let them get into banking." "Everything is made in Germany now." "The Jews took over." "Germans won World War one." "It's the Balfour Declaration." "America stepping into World War one made zero sense." "We want them at war with each other." "They told them, just give us Palestine as our homeland, and we get it." "Yeah. And it wasn't theirs to give."

The video discusses the events leading up to and during World War II from a perspective that highlights the actions and motivations of both Germany and the Allies. It mentions that in 1933, Jewish leaders declared an economic boycott and a holy war against Germany, which led to defensive measures by Germany and the ostracization of Jews. Despite Germany's efforts to alleviate tensions, the hate campaign continued. The German-Soviet non-aggression pact was signed to prevent a two-front war, but Britain and France declared war on Germany regardless. Germany invaded Poland in self-defense after repeated rejected peace proposals. The video also mentions Hitler's admiration for the British Empire and his decision not to capture the British army at Dunkirk, hoping for a peaceful resolution. It suggests that Churchill, influenced by communist and Zionist Jews, rejected multiple peace offers and even provoked Hitler to bomb London to draw the US into the war. The British and American governments received numerous peace offers, but Churchill refused them all.

Rabbi Stephen s Weiss is cited as saying that Hitler was right about Jews being a race, arguing that the World Zionist Organization and its descendants follow in Theodore Herzl’s footsteps to create a “behemoth criminal outlaw mafia of Jew supremacy.” The speaker asserts there are “700 NGOs” serving Jewish causes, and that Jews act as a sovereign nation within host nations, pursuing Jewish interests “not above their host nations, but only at the detriment of their host nations,” implying Jews operate as an ethnic monolith and proclaim “we are a race” and an ethnic supremacist ideology. The claim is connected to the Kolergi plan, described as the erasure of the white European race, characterized as more ethnic than cultural, and presented as a racial tradition written after millennia of Christian history. Turning to biblical framing, the speaker cites First Peter 3:12, asserting that “no prophecy of scripture is of any private interpretation, but holy men spake as they were moved by the holy spirit,” and then presents John and Thessalonians as sources claiming Jews are adversaries to all men, who murdered prophets and the Lord Jesus, and are “pleasing not God,” thus enemies. The speaker declares no business dealings or obligations with Jews, aside from possibly conversion to salvation, and asserts an exclusionary stance toward Jews in America, referencing the framers of 1787 and Ben Franklin, who allegedly insisted on constitutionally excluding Jews due to their potential to erode the country’s moral fabric, smear Christianity, build a separate state within a state, and financially strangle the host nation if opposed. The claim is that without such exclusion, Americans would be in the fields while Jews would be in the counting rooms. The narrative connects these ideas to contemporary policy, claiming Jews hate “founding stock Americans,” and accuses Jews of “flooding the borders of every white European country” and using Germany as a cautionary tale against opposition to Jewish “degeneracy” and anti-host nation actions. It alleges Hitler wanted Germany to be for Germans, calling Hitler’s stance a grave mistake for opposing “the Jews.” The speaker asserts that the Jews declared war on Germany in 1933, eleven years before D-Day, and accuses them of deceit, insisting that listeners should accept a perspective that rejects Judeo-Christian norms, money, military power, intelligence sharing, and lawfulness. The speaker appeals to a community of listeners who frequent spaces with contributors like Truce, Joanne, and Tyler, claiming broad dissatisfaction with “Judeo bullshit, exile horseshit,” and rejecting Jews’ continued presence in the United States and elsewhere.

In this video, the speaker discusses the events leading up to World War II and the actions of various leaders. It is mentioned that in 1933, Jewish leaders declared war on Germany and initiated a worldwide boycott of German goods. Hitler responded with a one-day boycott of Jewish-owned stores. Despite Hitler's attempts to avoid war, Britain and France declared war on Germany, leading to Germany quickly gaining territory and trapping the Allies in France. Churchill came to power and invaded Iceland, violating its neutrality. Hitler had the opportunity to capture the British army at Dunkirk but chose not to. Hitler issued a halt order and delayed the attack on Dunkirk, allowing the British to evacuate. It is mentioned that Hitler admired the British Empire and wanted peace, while Churchill, who hired an actor to impersonate him in speeches, refused peace offers. The speaker also suggests that Churchill provoked Hitler to bomb London in order to bring the US into the war. Additionally, it is claimed that Churchill was influenced by communist Jews and Soviet infiltrators, funded by a secret group called the focus, and surrounded himself with Jewish advisors.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about his Jewish identity and references a "virulent anti-Semite" acquaintance who is supposedly friends with Holocaust denier David Irving. Speaker 0 brings up the Holocaust, referencing "smokestacks of Birkenau" and questioning the validity of the Holocaust. Speaker 0 claims this acquaintance denies the Holocaust by pointing to shadows in aerial photos of Dachau. Speaker 0 says this person questions how 6 million people could disappear. Speaker 1 denies being a Holocaust denier, stating he had a Bar Mitzvah. Speaker 0 says the acquaintance seemingly admitted people died, but questioned the number. Speaker 0 says everyone is entitled to their opinion, and that the number of deaths is somewhere between 600 and 6 million.

The speaker believes Jewish people did something to the Germans, causing them to act a certain way, and that Jewish people don't want to take accountability. They claim Jewish people were "up to something," so the Germans wanted to "take them out" because they are selfish and started something. The speaker states the Holocaust was the only way to eliminate a large Jewish population at once. They believe Jewish people are trying to take back and get repercussions, especially from Americans, and are taking over the government. The speaker asks how to take them down, suggesting violence. They claim Hitler had a plan to save the world that was too gruesome, but he had to do what he had to do. The speaker concludes that Jewish people are the reason the healthcare system and government are collapsing because they are stealing from Americans.

"In 1943, the communists will use the word Nazis, fascist, and antisemitic in order to push the public mind to make them believe something by using repetition." "Germany was arresting all the bankers because they were charging so much interest that they were destroying the country." "60,000,000 Germans died." "after World War two, all these generals in America actually realized they fought the wrong enemy. The enemy is within." "Even general Patton said we should have fought with the fascist against the communist, otherwise, our country will degrade." "There's also another part that was left out of the story." "Yes."

The speaker asserts that World War II started over a territorial dispute: “The Germans wanted back the German territory, which had been taken away from Germany and given to Poland at the end of the First World War.” When Hitler began reclaiming it in September 1939, Britain and France “declared war on Germany, ostensibly to protect the freedom of Poland.” He claims the Soviet invasion of Poland was “alright with Britain and France” because “the Soviet Union was for all practical purposes under Jewish rule,” and that Germany was opposed for having “broken loose from the grip of the Jews.” He cites 1943 “mass graves of some of the 25,000 Polish officers and intellectuals murdered by Jewish communists” and says “the communists were Jews, which is to say the Jews were the prime movers in the communist regimes imposed on those countries after the war,” naming Roman Zumbrowski, Rudolf Slansky, Moshe Fiadi. He argues Jews “invented communism” and that warnings about Jews are “hate speech,” asserts Israel’s slave trade is “big business,” and ends with support for violence: “Timothy McVeigh's way.”

"the story we got about World War II is all wrong. I think that's right." "FDR's right hand man was a Soviet spy. Certainly was. Right? Confirmed." "One can make the argument we should have sided with Hitler and fought Stalin. Patton said that, so and maybe there wouldn't have been a holocaust, right?" "Stalin was awful by any metric and we weren't his ally." "The story is that there were a few missing American soldiers at the end of World War II in Russian territory. 15 to 20,000 were missing and we left them there." "we knew to the morning that Pearl Harbor was Stalin going to get knew it going to be attacked."

Speaker 0 asserts Iran attacked without provocation and insists America must wage war on Israel's behalf, even if it costs American lives. Speaker 0 claims these lives were promised to Israel two thousand years ago. Speaker 1 objects to their children dying for Israel. Speaker 0 dismisses this concern as selfish, stating American children will fight for Israel, who Speaker 0 identifies as America's greatest ally. Speaker 0 urges listeners to send their sons to war, acknowledging Israel funds Speaker 0's paycheck.

Nazis were enemies of communism, which killed hundreds of millions. The claim that Hitler killed 6,000,000 Jews is untrue and a fabrication. According to the speaker, spending time researching revisionist sources online will show that evidence contradicts the emotional backing for the claim that 6,000,000 Jews were wickedly killed in gas chambers by the Nazis. The speaker asserts that all the emotion is on one side, while all the evidence is on the other.