reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Kamala Harris's campaign is accused of deliberate misinformation in a political ad. The ad features two Pennsylvania farmers who supposedly switched to supporting Kamala Harris after January 6th. However, these individuals, Robert Lang and Christina Chadwick, are allegedly actors with a history of donating to Democratic and leftist causes since at least 2016. This is seen as an example of a synthetic campaign and candidate, where narratives are manufactured. The individuals are portrayed as Trump supporters who turned, but they are allegedly Democratic actors. The question is whether this will be reported by mainstream media, and if so, it could damage the perception of Harris as an authentic candidate.

Women are warned not to vote for Kamala Harris, as the speaker believes she is corrupt. They urge feminists to do their research and not support her bid for presidency. The speaker claims Harris kept black men in prison for free labor and is not who she appears to be. They emphasize not to vote for her, calling her a devil.

The speaker claims that the vice-presidential candidate's voting record is to the left of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. The speaker believes the American people will examine her past stances and primary election statements, concluding she is a radical liberal. The speaker asserts she advocated spending $32 trillion on Medicare for All. The speaker also states that, as Attorney General in California, she essentially banned gun sales via executive action and threatened to do so again if elected.

The speaker says they are focused on solving the inflation crisis caused by Kamala Harris's policies. Regarding the 2020 election, the speaker believes issues should be debated peacefully in the public square, as Donald Trump has said. The speaker claims Trump said protesters should protest peacefully on January 6th. The speaker believes there is a threat to democracy in the form of censorship, Americans ending friendships over politics, and big tech silencing citizens. The speaker says Kamala Harris would rather censor people who engage in misinformation than debate them. The speaker is proud to have the endorsement of Bobby Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard, who may not agree on every issue, but are united behind the principle of debating differences. The speaker accuses Kamala Harris of engaging in censorship at an industrial scale, which they believe is a bigger threat to democracy than what Trump said about protesting peacefully on January 6th.

Kamala Harris announces her rebranding, acknowledging that Americans see her as unlikable, inauthentic, and prone to saying "crazy shit." She references past criticisms, including her role as border czar. Despite perceived shortcomings as Vice President, Harris emphasizes her ambition and hints at extreme measures she would take for the country. She then implies that voters who support her are "cringe." The message concludes with an endorsement of Trump 2024 and the slogan "Let's make America great again," attributed to Professor Sagun Dznotz.

The speaker believes Kamala Harris is a "marionette" controlled by over 100 "puppet masters." The speaker claims to know most of them and suggests a strong overlap between these individuals and the Epstein client list. The speaker is surprised that no one on the Epstein client list has been prosecuted, while many January 6th protesters have been imprisoned. The speaker believes a reason for Kamala Harris's support is that if Trump wins, the Epstein client list will become public, which terrifies some billionaires backing Harris. The speaker specifically names Reid Hoffman and Bill Gates as potentially nervous individuals, noting Hoffman was the speaker's VP of business development at PayPal 24 years ago.

Kamala mentioned the speaker's name 21 times but did not mention the border or inflation. She blamed the speaker for the border situation, despite the speaker not having visited the border in four years. The speaker claims to have had the safest and best border ever. Kamala's statements were characterized as lies. She accused the speaker of involvement with "project 25," which the speaker claims to be unfamiliar with.

The speaker believes Kamala Harris will claim to understand Americans' suffering while disavowing responsibility, despite holding power for the last four years. The speaker questions why Harris would withhold her solutions for five months until elected. While the Democratic convention will be well-scripted, the real work of winning the election will begin afterward. The messaging war will intensify, and Trump's team will portray Harris as more radical and less likable than Biden, emphasizing this daily.

The speaker criticizes Vice President Harris for supporting the Minnesota Freedom Fund, not for her abortion stance. Harris urged donations to the fund when it bailed out protesters. The fund has since bailed out other offenders, including one who Republicans claim committed a murder in downtown Saint Paul.

Kamala Harris is allegedly paying people to attend rallies. The speaker claims to have proof of this through a Casting Network billboard. The billboard sought nonunion actors for a Democratic event, offering payment, a per diem for meals and transportation, and coverage of flight and other expenses. The submissions were due the day before the speaker discussed it. The speaker believes this shows that the Harris campaign's ground game is a facade, as they are willing to pay for people to attend rallies.

Kamala Harris is proposing new economic policies that the speaker likens to Marxist economic philosophy. The speaker claims these proposals involve price controls, which they believe are economically unsound and lead to product shortages and "breadlines." The speaker also asserts that Kamala Harris has avoided legitimate interviews for 27 days. They mention an interview Harris did with Tim Walz, where they allegedly discussed white people's preference for "white foods" like tuna and mayo. The speaker suggests this is not racist because Harris is not white.

There are claims that the person presented as Kamala Harris is not actually her, as they look completely different. This has led to accusations of deception towards voters, suggesting the use of body doubles and a fake Kamala Harris.

The speaker claims the Democratic party is paying TikTok users thousands of dollars to create content promoting the party, and that they were offered nearly $15,000 to do so. They also claim to have seen mutuals posting content aligned with these pitches within 48 hours, without disclosing they were paid. The speaker says they received two pitches: one for ongoing monthly videos leading up to the election, and another to fearmonger about Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation. They criticize the Democratic party for allegedly using fearmongering tactics with bad information. The speaker notes that Heritage Foundation trustees are endorsing both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, and that Barack Obama previously worked with them. They state that one pitch instructed them to not directly say "vote for Kamala Harris for legal purposes." The speaker says they are informing viewers that people are being paid to create political content.

Kamala covered up Joe's mental decline and took charge, resulting in a border crisis, inflation, and the demise of the American dream. They are aware of Kamala's failed record. This message is sponsored by Make America Great Again Inc.

The speaker claims the Democratic party is paying TikTok users thousands of dollars to create content promoting the party, and that they were offered nearly $15,000 to do so. They allege that some mutuals began posting content aligned with these pitches within 48 hours, without disclosing they were paid. The speaker says they received two pitches: one for ongoing monthly videos leading up to the election, and another to fearmonger about Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation. They criticize the Democrats for allegedly using fearmongering tactics, noting the Heritage Foundation has been influential since the 1970s and that its trustees endorse both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. The speaker highlights a pitch instruction to avoid directly saying "vote for Kamala Harris" for legal reasons.

The speaker is endorsing Kamala Harris. The speaker asks why, and what position or endorsement influenced them. They refer to a country built on repelling against tax, characterizing this as a feature, not a bug. The speaker states they will go through "g in the heart."

Speaker 1 claims Kamala Harris's campaign slogan, "We're not going back. Forward together," is the same slogan used by the Communist Party USA for the past decade. Speaker 1 states that three years ago, Communist co-chair Rosanna Cambrian wrote an article titled, "We're not going back forward together." Speaker 2 says that this is how communists work to build a movement to topple capitalism. Speaker 1 asserts that communists have long acted as the ideological undergird of the Democrat party, and Kamala Harris is a continuation of that. Speaker 1 asks if people will continue to pretend that Kamala Harris is not influenced by communist ideology or choose not to be the idiot they think you are. Speaker 2 claims Chicago has produced more outstanding communist leaders than any other place.

The left is promoting Kamala Harris as a savior for the black community, but she has actually harmed it. They avoid discussing her policies and instead rely on propaganda to win votes. To truly understand her impact, we should question if she values black families, considering her past as a prosecutor and her relationship with Willie Brown.

The speakers discuss Kamala Harris's campaign allegedly paying for Google ads to promote articles with edited headlines and subheads. These altered headlines, according to the speakers, present a more favorable view of Harris than the original articles. Speaker 1 asserts that the Harris campaign is paying for misinformation, while simultaneously criticizing others for spreading it. Speaker 2 notes that while the ads are labeled as "paid for," many people may not notice the disclaimer. He adds that the original articles are already so positive that the campaign only needs to tweak the headlines to make them even more favorable. Speaker 0 expresses disgust, pointing out Harris has never received a vote, yet was allowed to approach the nomination without scrutiny. The Harris campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

There are claims that the person presented as Kamala Harris is not actually her, as they look different. This has led to accusations of deception towards voters, suggesting the use of body doubles and a fake Kamala Harris.

The speaker expresses surprise at Joe Biden's choice of Kamala Harris as his running mate, considering her views too radical. Harris is described as a radical liberal who supports spending $32 trillion on Medicare for All. The speaker claims that as Attorney General in California, Harris essentially banned gun sales with executive action and threatened to do the same as president. The speaker asserts that Democrats, as Kamala Harris stated, would defend our police, dismantle our freedom, destroy our history, and abandon our founding values. The speaker also claims that while the president has put Vice President Harris in charge of the border, Harris denies this, resulting in a humanitarian, national security, and health crisis.

The speaker claims Vice President Kamala Harris, also known as "Cum Queen La Imhoff," is a corrupt witch who slept her way to the top. The speaker alleges Harris has two Jewish children she adopted and is married to a Jewish husband. The speaker further claims Harris was a "frat hoe" at Howard University and isn't Black. The speaker then mentions meeting Harris's father in Jamaica.

The speakers discuss Kamala Harris, with one initially calling her a "moron" but then considering she may be intentionally vague to appeal to party bosses advancing their agenda, possibly related to the military-industrial complex. They play a sound bite of Harris speaking about an "opportunity economy," which they criticize as saying nothing. One speaker believes Harris possesses "high feral intelligence" and is driven by ambition, willing to do anything to succeed, lacking personal limits and genuine relationships. The speakers then discuss Harris's husband, referencing a Daily Mail report alleging he cheated on his first wife with the nanny, who became pregnant and later blamed him for losing the baby. The report also claims he physically assaulted a girlfriend in 2012. One speaker believes the allegations, noting the absence of a denial from the woman involved. The other speaker expresses shock that news outlets haven't addressed the allegations. Finally, there is an advertisement for Done With Debt, a debt relief service.

Mark Zuckerberg admitted the Biden-Harris administration pressured Facebook to censor COVID-19 content and information regarding the laptop. Speaker 1 states this confirms what many already knew and praises Zuckerberg for speaking out. They highlight Kamala Harris's focus on "freedom" in her campaign, including during debates and speeches at the Democratic convention. However, Speaker 1 argues Zuckerberg's admission exposes Harris and Biden for censoring free speech through Facebook. Speaker 1 concludes that Harris's words do not align with her actions and urges people to examine her record when considering her fitness for the presidency.

The discussion centers on claims that Kamala Harris supports taxpayer-funded sex change surgeries for prisoners. One speaker states that every transgender inmate would have access. Another speaker claims that under the Trump administration, such surgeries were available on a medical necessity basis to people in the federal prison system, calling the Trump campaign ad hypocritical. Trump aides deny advocating for the prison policy and say no gender transition surgeries occurred during his presidency. When asked if they would advocate for using taxpayer dollars for gender reassignment surgeries, the speaker responded that they would follow the law, as Donald Trump would say he did. They also claim Trump spent $20,000,000 on ads to create fear in voters instead of focusing on the needs of the American people.