reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In the latest episode of the Megyn Kelly Show, Megyn discusses the ongoing crisis in Ukraine, where President Zelensky has urged citizens to defend their country against the Russian invasion. Former State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus emphasizes that Ukraine is fighting alone and expresses concern that the U.S. is not providing the necessary support. Ortagus highlights the implications of Ukraine's situation on global security, particularly regarding nuclear disarmament and the U.S.'s credibility as an ally. The conversation shifts to President Biden's handling of the situation, with Ortagus criticizing the administration's reliance on sanctions without a credible threat of military force. She argues that Putin cannot be reasoned with and that the U.S. needs a stronger deterrent strategy. The discussion also touches on the Biden administration's negotiations with Iran and how the Ukraine crisis affects U.S. alliances, particularly with Israel. Rich Lowry joins the show to discuss the political ramifications of the war in Ukraine. He notes that the Ukrainian resistance is admirable but ultimately outmatched by Russian forces. Lowry expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of sanctions and emphasizes the need for a more robust response to deter further Russian aggression, particularly regarding NATO's eastern members. The episode also covers the Supreme Court nomination of Katanji Brown Jackson, with panelists discussing her qualifications and the political implications of her nomination. They express concerns about the perception of her appointment as a token choice based on race rather than merit. Additionally, the show addresses the controversial handling of a case involving a transgender woman, Hannah Tubbs, who was sentenced to a juvenile facility after committing a serious crime. The panel criticizes the leniency shown by the Los Angeles District Attorney's office and the broader implications of such decisions on public safety. Finally, the discussion touches on the Black Lives Matter organization, with allegations of financial mismanagement and fraud emerging from various states. The panelists argue that the organization has strayed from its original mission and is now facing scrutiny for its practices. Overall, the episode presents a critical view of current events, highlighting the complexities of international relations, domestic policy, and social justice movements.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the recent capture of Kherson by Russian forces in Ukraine and the implications for President Putin's strategy. Buck Sexton, a former CIA analyst, argues that the narrative surrounding Russia's struggles is overly optimistic and that the situation is progressing according to Putin's plans. He compares the conflict to a boxing match, suggesting that despite initial setbacks, the larger and stronger opponent (Russia) may ultimately prevail. Sexton explains that Putin's initial military deployment was limited, indicating he anticipated a longer campaign. He expresses concern that the Russians will escalate their tactics, potentially leading to significant civilian casualties, drawing parallels to past conflicts in Chechnya. Kelly and Sexton discuss the divisions within U.S. political factions regarding intervention in Ukraine, with the left appearing more pro-intervention and the right divided on the issue. Sexton emphasizes that the U.S. should not engage militarily, recalling historical contexts where direct confrontation with Russia was avoided. He critiques the left's support for intervention as a reaction to current political pressures, while noting that some voices on the right advocate for restraint and caution against military involvement. The conversation shifts to the complexities of U.S.-Russia relations, with Sexton highlighting Putin's long-term ambitions and grievances stemming from the collapse of the Soviet Union. They discuss how U.S. actions, including NATO expansion and past interventions, may have contributed to current tensions. Sexton argues that understanding this context is crucial for informed decision-making regarding U.S. foreign policy. The discussion then moves to domestic issues, including the political landscape in the U.S. and Biden's recent State of the Union address, where he attempted to align with traditional American values. Kelly and Sexton critique Biden's handling of various issues, including law enforcement and foreign policy, suggesting that his administration is struggling to maintain credibility. The conversation concludes with a focus on the cultural implications of political decisions, touching on the treatment of figures like Art Briles in college football and the ongoing debate surrounding transgender athletes in sports, particularly Leah Thomas. Whitlock argues for the need for accountability and fairness in these discussions, emphasizing the importance of speaking out against perceived injustices.

In this Keeping It Real episode, Jillian Michaels interviews Megyn Kelly about Trump’s cabinet selections and the broader media landscape. The talk navigates the volatile relationship between traditional outlets and new media, with Kelly arguing that legacy media has long targeted Trump and that distrust has intensified as coverage has polarized. The conversation delves into Matt Gaetz, Tulsi Gabbard, Marco Rubio, and other figures, highlighting why Trump might value disruptive, aggressive personalities at the top of DOJ and related departments, rather than traditional relied-upon credentials. Kelly contends that Gaetz’s appetite for confrontation could be a tool for Trump, while acknowledging legitimate concerns about past conduct and credibility clashing with partisan narratives. She emphasizes that the left’s hostility toward Trump stems from his refusal to conform to established norms, framing media hostility as an ongoing, structural pattern rather than a temporary disagreement. A central thread is Kelly’s personal evolution in interpreting political adversaries, including her stance toward Steve Bannon. She explains how she shifted from antagonism to strategic understanding, recognizing Bannon as a capable operator and acknowledging common enemies in the broader political fight. The discussion also tackles the role of journalism ethics, conspiracy theories, and the risk of radicalization as audiences seek credible sources amid inconsistent coverage. Kelly stresses the importance of cross-cutting research, consuming diverse viewpoints, and resisting the pull of absolute certainty. The interview then pivots to international questions, such as diplomacy with controversial leaders, the Telegram-like rhetoric around Russiagate, and the balance between combatting corruption and engaging with adversaries to avert greater danger. The overall message is one of caution with media narratives, a demand for accountability, and a recognition that American politics now operates under heightened, often fragmented, scrutiny.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing Donald Trump's response to Nikki Haley's mental competency challenge and offers advice to CNN regarding Don Lemon's misogynistic comments. Glenn Beck joins her to discuss the current political climate, including Lemon's relaxed demeanor amid controversy and the perceived double standards in media treatment based on race and sexual orientation. They criticize CNN's handling of Lemon's comments and the absurdity of sending him to a "re-education camp" for misogyny. The conversation shifts to President Biden's recent actions in Ukraine, with Beck expressing concern over U.S. involvement and the implications of Biden's visit. They discuss the declining public support for military aid to Ukraine and the potential consequences of escalating tensions with Russia. Beck highlights the need for accountability in U.S. foreign policy and the importance of addressing domestic issues like the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, which has been largely ignored by the federal government. Kelly and Beck also touch on the media's credibility crisis, particularly regarding COVID-19 reporting and the influence of social media platforms on public discourse. They discuss the recent Dominion lawsuit against Fox News, emphasizing the potential for proving actual malice in the network's coverage of election fraud claims. Beck notes the importance of transparency in journalism and the need for media outlets to uphold their standards. The discussion concludes with a focus on Project Veritas and the departure of James O'Keefe, with Kelly expressing skepticism about the organization's future without its founder. They reflect on the broader implications of media integrity and the challenges faced by journalists in today's political landscape.

In this conversation, Patrick Bet-David welcomes Cenk Uygur back for a discussion that covers a wide range of political topics, including the upcoming elections, the state of the Democratic Party, and various cultural issues. They reflect on the significance of the NBA playoffs as a metaphor for the current political climate, emphasizing the intensity of the upcoming election season. Cenk shares his thoughts on the recent film "Oppenheimer," praising its message about diversity and its historical context regarding the development of the atomic bomb. He argues that the contributions of Jewish scientists were crucial to the U.S. victory in World War II, highlighting the irony of Nazi anti-Semitism inadvertently aiding the Allies. The discussion shifts to current events, including the ongoing war in Ukraine, with Cenk expressing concern about the potential for escalation and the implications of U.S. involvement. He critiques the push for NATO expansion near Russia, suggesting it provoked the conflict. Cenk emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach to U.S. foreign policy, advocating for support of Ukraine without provoking further aggression from Russia. They also touch on the political landscape, discussing figures like Trump and Biden. Cenk argues that while Trump did not start new wars during his presidency, his unpredictability poses a risk, especially in the context of nuclear weapons. He expresses skepticism about the credibility of fears surrounding Trump starting a war, given his previous actions. The conversation then moves to the topic of climate change and mental health, with Cenk referencing a Wall Street Journal article that labels climate change obsession as a mental disorder. They discuss the implications of such views and the broader societal reactions to climate change. Cenk and Patrick explore the implications of recent political events, including the testimony of Devin Archer regarding Hunter Biden's business dealings. Cenk argues that while Hunter Biden's actions may be questionable, there is insufficient evidence to implicate Joe Biden directly in wrongdoing. He stresses the importance of evidence and due process in political discourse. The discussion also covers the cultural wars in America, particularly regarding LGBTQ+ issues and education. Cenk defends the rights of individuals to express their identities while acknowledging the complexities surrounding discussions of gender and sexuality in schools. He emphasizes the need for open dialogue and understanding, rather than divisive rhetoric. Cenk announces his new book, "Justice is Coming," which addresses the need for a progressive movement that can unite various factions within the Democratic Party. He argues that the party has been captured by corporate interests and that a grassroots movement is necessary to reclaim it. Throughout the conversation, Cenk and Patrick engage in a spirited debate about the future of American politics, the role of media, and the importance of addressing economic issues that resonate with the majority of Americans. They conclude by encouraging listeners to engage with the ideas presented and to consider the implications of the current political climate on future elections.

Megan Kelly opens the show discussing Donald Trump's court appearance, where he was fined for violating a gag order related to his comments about the jury. She speculates that jail time could rally support for Trump. She also criticizes Columbia University for canceling its commencement due to protests, suggesting parents should reconsider sending their children there. Victor Davis Hanson joins the show to discuss his new book, "The End of Everything: How Wars Descend into Annihilation." He draws parallels between ancient civilizations' downfalls and modern America, emphasizing that societies often fail to recognize their decline. He cites examples like Carthage and the fall of Constantinople, noting that these civilizations believed they were still strong despite being in decline. Hanson identifies three indicators of America's decline: the erosion of the rule of law, a lack of confidence in the military, and financial instability due to overwhelming debt. He warns that the U.S. is borrowing excessively and lacks military readiness, which could lead to dire consequences. The conversation shifts to the cultural and political landscape, with Hanson noting that the current political climate resembles historical patterns of societal collapse. He expresses concern over the growing divide in America, with people moving to states that align with their values, leading to geographical and cultural fragmentation. Megan and Victor discuss the implications of the Electoral College and the potential for its abolition, arguing that it protects smaller states from being overshadowed by larger ones. They highlight the dangers of majority rule and the need for checks and balances to prevent the erosion of foundational principles. The discussion also touches on the media's role in shaping narratives around Trump and the double standards in how different political figures are treated. They critique the left's tactics and the potential consequences of continued political polarization. Megan then addresses the recent controversies surrounding Christy Noem, who has faced backlash for exaggerating her experiences with world leaders and for a troubling story about her dog. They discuss how her attempts to portray toughness may backfire and the importance of authenticity in political leadership. The show concludes with a reflection on the current state of American universities, where students are demanding accommodations for emotional distress and engaging in protests that reflect a disconnect from reality. Hanson emphasizes the need for a return to traditional values and accountability in education and governance.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the positive reception of President-elect Donald Trump at a UFC fight, highlighting NFL players celebrating him and suggesting that being a Republican is now seen as "cool." She contrasts this with the negative portrayal of Trump by MSNBC hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, who have shifted their tone from calling him a fascist to seeking dialogue with him, which she finds insincere. Glenn Greenwald joins the discussion, criticizing Scarborough and Brzezinski for their opportunistic behavior and lack of journalistic integrity. He argues that they have been humiliated by their previous extreme rhetoric against Trump, only to now seek to re-establish a relationship with him for ratings. Kelly and Greenwald express disdain for their past comments, suggesting that their motivations are career-driven rather than principled. The conversation shifts to the topic of "house stealing," a form of real estate fraud where scammers illegally transfer home titles. Kelly promotes a service called Home Title Lock that offers protection against such scams. Kelly and Greenwald then discuss the broader media landscape, particularly the left's tendency to label critics as conspiracy theorists. Greenwald points out that the media's portrayal of Trump as Hitler was a significant theme during the election, which has now been abandoned in favor of seeking cooperation. They reflect on the hypocrisy of the media's narrative and the lack of accountability for those who propagated false claims. The discussion moves to Tulsi Gabbard, who has faced accusations of being a Russian asset. Greenwald expresses his contempt for the unfounded allegations against her, emphasizing the dangers of such narratives and the historical parallels to McCarthyism. He argues that Gabbard's military service and dissenting views on foreign policy should be respected rather than vilified. Kelly and Greenwald also touch on the treatment of other Trump nominees, including Pete Hegseth, who has been accused of serious misconduct. They discuss the double standards in how allegations are treated based on political affiliation, criticizing the media's focus on personal lives rather than substantive policy issues. The conversation concludes with a focus on RFK Jr. and Matt Gaetz, both of whom are seen as disruptors within the political landscape. Kelly and Greenwald discuss the backlash against them from the establishment, highlighting the fear that disruptors instill in traditional political figures. They emphasize the importance of questioning authority and the need for a media that holds power accountable. Overall, the discussion critiques the media's role in shaping narratives, the hypocrisy of political figures, and the challenges faced by those who challenge the status quo.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the media's neglect of American women's issues, focusing on Kamala Harris's recent appearance on the podcast "Call Her Daddy." Kelly criticizes the media's celebration of Harris's interview, arguing it was a failure in presidential politics. She highlights a moment where Harris responded to Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders's comments about humility, asserting that many women do not aspire to be humble and emphasizing the importance of diverse family structures. Kelly argues that attacking Harris for not having biological children is a poor political strategy for Republicans. Kelly expresses frustration with Harris's lack of humility and governing experience, noting that her responses often reflect insecurity. She criticizes the media for failing to address serious allegations against Doug Emhoff, Harris's husband, who has been accused of assaulting an ex-girlfriend. Kelly points out the hypocrisy in Harris's claims to be a champion for women while ignoring the allegations against Emhoff. The discussion shifts to Harris's interview content, which Kelly claims focused heavily on abortion, neglecting broader issues affecting women. She challenges the narrative that the GOP wants to take away women's rights, arguing that there are many other pressing concerns for women that are overlooked. Kelly emphasizes the need for a more comprehensive discussion about women's rights beyond abortion. Andrew Klavan joins the conversation, agreeing with Kelly's assessment of the media's protection of Harris and the need for Republicans to articulate a clearer message about her policies. He criticizes the Democratic Party's anti-American ideology and suggests that the GOP has failed to effectively communicate the dangers of Harris's beliefs. The conversation touches on the media's portrayal of Trump and Biden, with Klavan noting that the press often overlooks Biden's failings while scrutinizing Trump. They discuss the importance of strong leadership and the perception of strength in a president, contrasting Trump’s resilience with Harris's perceived weaknesses. Kelly concludes by reflecting on Trump's recent rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where he demonstrated strength and connection with his family, contrasting this with the media's portrayal of Harris. She emphasizes the need for a more balanced view of both candidates, highlighting the importance of their personal lives in understanding their character.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing her family's early Thanksgiving celebration, humorously referring to it as "fakesgiving." She transitions to political topics, noting that President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet is complete and highlighting the media's acknowledgment of its ideological diversity. A CBS News poll shows significant public support for Trump, which she anticipates will upset the media. Joining her are guests Stu Berge and Steven L. Miller, who engage in light banter about Thanksgiving foods, particularly stuffing and cranberry sauce. They then shift to a critique of the media, particularly Joe Scarborough's defense of journalism against social media criticism. Scarborough argues that being a reporter requires hard work and integrity, which Kelly and her guests challenge, citing instances where mainstream media failed to hold power accountable. The conversation turns to the media's handling of Trump and the upcoming confirmation process for his cabinet picks. They discuss the implications of the media's bias and how it affects public perception, particularly regarding the credibility of accusations against political figures. Kelly emphasizes that the media's past failures, especially during the Kavanaugh hearings, have led to skepticism about current allegations against figures like Pete Hegseth, who faces scrutiny over personal conduct. They analyze the political landscape, including Kamala Harris's potential ambitions and the public's mixed feelings about her. The discussion also touches on the media's portrayal of police actions during the January 6 Capitol riot, particularly the shooting of Ashley Babbitt, and how it contrasts with their treatment of other police shootings. As the show progresses, they critique the selection of cabinet members, particularly Dr. Janet Woodcock for Surgeon General, expressing concern over her past positions on COVID-19 measures. They conclude by emphasizing the importance of accountability in journalism and the need for a more balanced approach to reporting on political figures and their actions. The episode wraps up with a promise to delve deeper into Trump's cabinet in future discussions.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the ongoing drama surrounding President-elect Trump's cabinet nominations, particularly the shock of Congressman Matt Gates being nominated for Attorney General. The hosts express their surprise and excitement over the nomination, with some viewing it as a strategic move by Trump to provoke reactions from both parties. They discuss Gates' controversial reputation, including allegations against him that the DOJ chose not to pursue, and his role in the ousting of former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, which has made him unpopular among establishment Republicans. The conversation shifts to the challenges Gates may face during confirmation, with some Republican senators already signaling opposition. The hosts debate the implications of Trump's choice, suggesting that while Gates may be a polarizing figure, his loyalty to Trump and ability to confront the establishment could be beneficial for the administration. They emphasize the importance of using political capital wisely in the early days of Trump's presidency to push through significant agenda items. The discussion also touches on the broader political landscape, including the Democrats' struggles and the potential for a shift in voter sentiment regarding issues like immigration and crime. The hosts highlight the changing dynamics in urban areas, where crime and economic concerns are becoming increasingly relevant to voters. As the show progresses, they address the reactions from the left regarding Trump's nominations and the perceived failures of the Democratic Party to connect with voters. They critique the media's portrayal of Trump and his supporters, noting a disconnect between elite narratives and the concerns of everyday Americans. The hosts conclude by discussing the implications of Trump's cabinet choices for the future of the Republican Party and the political landscape, emphasizing the need for strong, loyal figures in key positions to execute Trump's vision and address the challenges facing the country. They express optimism about the potential for significant changes under Trump's leadership, particularly in areas like the Department of Justice and immigration policy.

Megyn Kelly opens the show by sharing a personal story about a recent dream and a close call with timing before diving into current hot topics. She discusses Nancy Pelosi's threatening comments towards President Trump, President Biden's remarks on inflation, and parents confronting school boards over controversial drag shows. Tulsi Gabbard, a former congresswoman and presidential candidate, joins the show to discuss her recent departure from the Democratic Party. Gabbard reflects on her political evolution, stating that the party has become dominated by ideologues who undermine free speech and civil liberties. She emphasizes the importance of independent thinking and encourages others to leave the Democratic Party if they feel similarly disillusioned. The conversation shifts to the media's reaction to Gabbard's departure compared to Republicans who have distanced themselves from their party. Gabbard notes that independent thinkers are often treated negatively by the mainstream media, which favors those who align with the establishment. The discussion then transitions to the topic of foreign policy, particularly regarding the U.S. stance on Russia and Ukraine. Gabbard argues for de-escalation and diplomacy, warning against the dangers of nuclear conflict. She criticizes the current administration for failing to prioritize American interests and for escalating tensions. Kelly and Gabbard also touch on the issue of education, highlighting parents' concerns over sexualization in schools and the push for "family-friendly" drag shows. Gabbard expresses her alarm over the Democratic Party's stance on these issues, calling it a threat to family values. The show continues with a segment on Kim Kardashian's podcast advocating for the exoneration of a convicted murderer, Kevin Keith. Gabbard expresses skepticism about Kardashian's motivations and the implications of revisiting such convictions without solid evidence. Finally, they discuss the billion-dollar verdict against Alex Jones for defaming Sandy Hook families, with Gabbard asserting that Jones's actions have caused immense harm. The episode concludes with a reflection on the Parkland shooting trial, where a jury recommended life in prison for the shooter, prompting outrage from victims' families. Throughout the show, Gabbard emphasizes the need for independent thought, the importance of protecting children, and the dangers of current political ideologies.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing President Biden's recent activities, including his overseas trip with King Charles and the media's avoidance of topics like Hunter Biden and the cocaine incident at the White House. She criticizes Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen for bowing to Chinese officials, stating that Americans should stand upright in diplomatic situations. The conversation shifts to Casey DeSantis, who is facing intense media scrutiny. Kelly highlights a recent ad featuring Casey, where she passionately defends children's rights against perceived exploitation. The panel discusses the media's harsh treatment of her compared to previous first ladies, noting that Casey's visibility as a political figure has made her a target. They express that the left's attacks on her are indicative of her effectiveness as a messenger for Ron DeSantis. The discussion then transitions to Ron DeSantis's campaign struggles, with the panel analyzing his recent polling numbers and fundraising efforts. They note that while DeSantis has a strong message, his campaign lacks effective communication and organization. The panel emphasizes the importance of DeSantis connecting with voters and suggests he should engage more with the media, particularly in confrontational settings, to resonate with the Republican base. Kelly also touches on Biden's temperament, citing reports of his anger and frustration behind closed doors, contrasting it with his public persona. The panel discusses the implications of Biden's age and physical condition, suggesting that his perceived frailty could impact his re-election campaign. The conversation shifts to RFK Jr., who is gaining traction with his unconventional views, particularly on vaccines and social issues. The panel acknowledges the media's attempts to discredit him while recognizing his authenticity resonates with many voters. Finally, the discussion highlights the importance of social connections for mental health, emphasizing that loneliness can have detrimental effects on well-being. The hosts advocate for fostering real-life interactions and community ties as essential for a healthy lifestyle. They conclude by discussing the complexities of nutrition and the confusion surrounding dietary trends, advocating for a balanced approach to eating real, unprocessed foods while enjoying life.

In the latest episode of the Megyn Kelly Show, Megyn discusses the U.S. role in the Ukraine crisis with Rod Dreher, a senior editor at the American Conservative. As Vice President Kamala Harris travels to address the situation, Megyn emphasizes the need for thoughtful consideration of U.S. involvement, cautioning against decisions driven by emotional responses or media narratives. Dreher expresses concern over the rush to support military intervention, drawing parallels to the Iraq War and the consequences of acting on moralistic fervor without realistic assessments. Dreher argues that the mainstream media is shaping a narrative that simplifies the conflict into a good versus evil dichotomy, which can lead to dangerous outcomes. He recalls the post-9/11 atmosphere where similar fervor led to disastrous military actions. He warns that the current push for intervention may overlook the complexities of the situation, including the historical ties between Russia and Ukraine, and the potential repercussions of escalating military involvement. The conversation shifts to the media's portrayal of the conflict, with Dreher questioning why the focus on Russia seems more intense compared to other authoritarian regimes. He suggests that the perception of Russia as a European nation contributes to a different standard of scrutiny. Megyn and Dreher discuss the implications of sanctions on ordinary Russians, emphasizing the need to differentiate between the Russian people and their government. Dreher highlights the importance of understanding the motivations behind Russia's actions, arguing that the U.S. must consider its own interests and the potential for unintended consequences. He warns against the moral panic that can cloud judgment and lead to hasty decisions. The discussion also touches on the historical context of NATO's expansion and its impact on U.S.-Russia relations. As the episode progresses, Major General Michael Ripass joins to present a more hawkish perspective, advocating for a limited no-fly zone to protect civilians. He acknowledges the risks involved but emphasizes the humanitarian obligation to respond to the crisis. Ripass discusses the challenges facing the Russian military and the resilience of the Ukrainian forces, attributing their effectiveness to strong leadership and a unified national identity. The episode concludes with a reflection on the complexities of international relations and the need for careful deliberation before committing to military action, underscoring the importance of balancing moral imperatives with strategic interests.

Megyn Kelly welcomes guests Michael Waltz, National Security Advisor, and Karoline Leavitt, the youngest White House Press Secretary. Waltz discusses the current foreign policy challenges, particularly regarding Ukraine and Russia. He emphasizes that President Trump has engaged in "shuttle diplomacy," speaking with both Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky to facilitate negotiations. Waltz argues that Trump's approach contrasts with the previous administration's open-ended support for Ukraine, suggesting that a realistic settlement will require concessions from both sides, including territorial adjustments. Waltz addresses criticisms of Trump’s statements about NATO and Ukraine, asserting that the U.S. public is not in favor of Ukraine joining NATO during an active conflict. He highlights the need for security guarantees for Ukraine and the importance of European nations taking responsibility for their own defense. Leavitt shares her background, noting her non-political upbringing and her journey to becoming Press Secretary. She expresses her love for the job and the challenges of balancing motherhood with her role. Leavitt emphasizes the importance of speaking one's truth and encourages young people to be vocal about their beliefs. Both guests discuss the media's portrayal of Trump, with Leavitt asserting that negative coverage skews public perception. She defends the administration's transparency and commitment to addressing wasteful government spending. The conversation touches on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, with Waltz stressing the need for a long-term solution to prevent future violence. The episode concludes with Kelly promoting her show and encouraging viewers to stay informed about current events.

Megyn Kelly hosts a wide‑ranging discussion centered on recent Iranian developments, U.S. internal politics, and the people shaping both narratives. The episode opens with coverage of President Trump’s rumored moves on Iran policy and potential shakeups within his administration, including speculation about Pam Bondi’s fate and questions about Tulsi Gabbard’s role as DNI. The conversation quickly broadens to analyze loyalty versus competence in political appointments, with guests offering perspectives on how past aides and decisions—ranging from Epstein files to antitrust enforcement—have influenced public perception and political dynamics. The panel emphasizes how internal White House dynamics, media coverage, and public polling intersect with policy choices, suggesting that domestic political incentives often drive strategic clarity—or the lack thereof—on foreign interventions. A central thread is the Iran question: the hosts and guests debate what constitutes a strategic objective, how escalation risks shape public support, and whether recent statements signal a wind‑down or a continued push toward confrontation. They contrast differing voices within the administration and media, discussing whether rhetoric and policy are aligned or whether the administration is scrambling to manage domestic backlash while facing hawkish allies. Throughout, the episode probes how messaging from the White House, televised addresses, and on‑the‑record interviews influence public understanding of limits, timelines, and military commitments in a volatile region. The interview segment features John Kiriakou, a former CIA officer, who reflects on a career spent in and around counterterrorism, intelligence culture, and the ethics of interrogation. He revisits MKUltra with historical detail, critiques the oversight environment, and offers insider observations about interactions with allies, rivals, and internal security culture. The discussion delves into how intelligence work intersects with democracy, accountability, and civil liberties, including the tension between national security agendas and the public’s right to transparency. Throughout, the guests share personal experiences illustrating the strains of life inside and around the CIA and its impact on marriage, loyalty, and professional choices.

The All In podcast features hosts Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, and David Friedberg, along with guest Shayne Coplan. Chamath discusses his busy travel schedule, including speaking engagements, while the group humorously engages in banter about hats and ratings. They transition to discussing the recent Trump election victory and its impact on financial markets, particularly Bitcoin, which peaked at $92,000. Friedberg notes that Trump's policies are seen as stimulatory, benefiting sectors like crypto and fintech due to expected deregulation. Sacks highlights the potential for clearer crypto regulations following the Republican win, referencing the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act, which aims to classify digital assets. The conversation shifts to IPOs and M&A, with Chamath expressing skepticism about a robust IPO market in the near term due to high interest rates. He suggests that while there may be some risk-seeking behavior in the market, significant M&A activity is unlikely without compelling industrial logic. The hosts discuss the implications of Trump's cabinet picks, particularly focusing on Bobby Kennedy's role in health and human services and Matt Gates as attorney general. Sacks argues that Gates could bring necessary reform to the DOJ, while Friedberg emphasizes the need for a balance of hawkish and dovish voices in the cabinet to prevent unnecessary wars. The podcast concludes with a discussion on the potential for significant changes in government bureaucracy under Trump's administration, suggesting that shaking things up could lead to a more resilient system.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing significant events, including Ukrainian President Zelensky's meeting with President Trump, Andrew Tate's return to the U.S., and the disappointing Epstein files release. She introduces Emily Jashinsky, a DC correspondent, to discuss the Epstein files, which were criticized for lacking new information despite being presented as a major document dump. Jashinsky highlights the awkwardness of the situation, where right-wing influencers were invited to the White House only to receive already known information, leading to embarrassment for those involved. The conversation shifts to the implications of the Epstein files release and the apparent miscommunication between the DOJ and the influencers. Jashinsky notes that the White House is upset with the DOJ over the optics of the event, suggesting it could create rifts among Trump supporters. They discuss the potential fallout for Pam Bondi, who was involved in the release, and the need for transparency moving forward. The discussion then turns to Andrew Tate, who has returned to the U.S. amid ongoing legal issues. Kelly expresses her disdain for Tate, describing him as a misogynist and a negative influence on young men. Jashinsky adds that some young men are drawn to Tate's controversial views on masculinity, complicating the conservative response to him. They emphasize the need for the right to distance itself from figures like Tate, who could harm their brand. Kelly recounts her experience speaking at a conference in DC, where she felt her views were mischaracterized by Ben Smith, a former journalist. She reflects on the challenges of maintaining credibility while navigating her audience's expectations and the media landscape. The conversation touches on the importance of owning one's biases while providing fair commentary. The hosts then discuss Zelensky's contentious meeting with Trump, where Trump criticized Zelensky's approach to negotiations with Putin. They express concern over the diplomatic fallout and the implications for U.S. involvement in Ukraine. The conversation highlights the complexities of international relations and the challenges of negotiating peace. Finally, they discuss Monica Lewinsky's recent appearance on the podcast "Call Her Daddy," where she reflected on her past with Bill Clinton. The hosts critique the media's treatment of Lewinsky and the ongoing public interest in her story, suggesting that she should move on from the scandal. They conclude by discussing the broader implications of the #MeToo movement and the challenges faced by women in similar situations.

Megan Kelly welcomes Victor Davis Hanson to discuss the ongoing situation in Ukraine and the implications of U.S. energy policy. Hanson criticizes John Kerry's perspective on global events, arguing that Kerry represents a tone-deaf elite who fails to understand the consequences of shutting down domestic energy production. He highlights the Biden administration's contradictory actions, such as lifting sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 pipeline while neglecting alternatives like the East Mediterranean pipeline, which could benefit U.S. allies. Hanson emphasizes that the current energy policy has empowered Vladimir Putin and questions the rationale behind prioritizing green energy over energy independence. He points out that the Biden administration's narrative of "Putin inflation" contradicts earlier claims about inflation being transitory and linked to supply chain issues. He notes that rising prices for essential goods are affecting the middle class, while elites remain disconnected from these realities. The conversation shifts to the disconnect between the Democratic Party and working-class Americans, with Hanson arguing that the party has become aligned with wealthy elites rather than the working class. He criticizes the focus on climate change over immediate economic concerns, suggesting that the administration's policies are detrimental to ordinary citizens. Hanson also discusses the implications of U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding Iran and North Korea, asserting that recent actions have signaled weakness and emboldened adversaries. He argues that the withdrawal from Afghanistan has damaged U.S. credibility and deterrence, leading to increased aggression from hostile nations. The discussion concludes with a critique of the current political climate, emphasizing the need for a return to effective governance that prioritizes national security and economic stability. Hanson warns that the current trajectory poses significant risks to the U.S. and its allies.

Megyn Kelly announces the hiring of Hope Hicks as the first chief operating officer of her independent media company, emphasizing her control over editorial decisions and the company's growth. Kelly expresses excitement about expanding MK Media and the upcoming MK True Crime initiative. The discussion shifts to Donald Trump's recent press conference in Scotland, where he speaks candidly on various topics, showcasing his confidence and ability to engage with the media without a script. Kelly highlights Trump's success with tariffs, countering initial negative predictions from media and political figures, and emphasizes the positive economic outcomes resulting from his trade policies. Victor Davis Hanson joins the conversation, noting that Trump has secured favorable tariff agreements with countries like Japan and the UK, which benefit the U.S. economy. Hanson reflects on the historical context of trade and tariffs, arguing that previous economic orthodoxies underestimated the potential for profit margins under new agreements. He discusses the significant foreign investment projected in the U.S. and the impact of deregulation under Trump, which has led to job creation and economic growth. The conversation also touches on Trump's evolving stance on Vladimir Putin, as he recognizes the need for a firmer approach in light of Russia's actions in Ukraine. Both Kelly and Hanson discuss the implications of Trump's negotiations and the potential consequences for the Republican Party's stance on foreign policy. They address the media's selective coverage of violence, particularly a recent incident in Cincinnati involving a racially charged mob attack, highlighting the disparity in reporting based on the races of the individuals involved. Hanson critiques the current societal attitudes towards race and accountability, advocating for a return to individual responsibility rather than group-based grievances. The discussion concludes with commentary on the left's reaction to cultural issues, including the backlash against Sydney Sweeney's ad campaign for American Eagle, which some critics labeled as promoting white supremacy. Kelly and Hanson argue that the left's demands for representation and sensitivity have become excessive and counterproductive, ultimately undermining the principles of equality and fairness.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the backlash over Congresswoman Nancy Mace's bathroom bill, with AOC labeling it "disgusting." She also mentions The View's controversial coverage of Matt Gaetz, leading to a forced apology. Andrew Klavan joins the discussion, criticizing the left's reaction to Trump's cabinet picks and their portrayal of Gaetz. Klavan argues that the left's outrage is hypocritical, given their history with figures like Bill Clinton. He expresses satisfaction with Trump's appointments, viewing them as necessary to reform dysfunctional government departments. Klavan emphasizes that Trump's election represents a rejection of the media's narrative and the establishment's control over discourse. He believes that Trump's victory is a significant rebuke to a corrupt system that has suppressed dissent. Kelly and Klavan share a sense of amusement at the left's attempts to downplay Trump's electoral success, with Klavan noting that the left's blindness to their failures is evident. The conversation shifts to the implications of the transgender movement, particularly regarding bathroom access. Kelly highlights a recent victory in Congress, where Speaker Johnson announced that men would not be allowed in women's bathrooms, a decision she supports. Klavan critiques the media's response to this issue, arguing that it reflects a broader cultural conflict. They also discuss the fallout from Matt Gaetz's withdrawal from consideration for Attorney General, with Klavan suggesting that the allegations against him were exaggerated. He expresses disappointment but acknowledges the political realities at play. The discussion touches on the broader implications of the Biden administration's foreign policy, particularly regarding Ukraine and Russia. Jeffrey Sachs later joins to discuss the risks of escalating tensions with Russia, criticizing Biden's recent decisions as reckless. Sachs argues that the war in Ukraine could have been avoided through diplomacy and highlights the historical context of NATO's expansion. He asserts that the U.S. has acted with arrogance, disregarding Russia's security concerns. Sachs emphasizes the need for a new approach to U.S.-Russia relations, advocating for cooperation rather than confrontation. He believes that both Russia and China desire peace and that the U.S. should seek to build constructive relationships rather than provoke conflict. The conversation concludes with a call for a reevaluation of U.S. foreign policy to prioritize diplomacy and stability.

Megyn Kelly and Walter Kirn frame fall’s return to politics against a backdrop of a high-stakes diplomacy day in Washington. They discuss Ukrainian President Zelenskiy’s return to the White House for talks with Trump, with European leaders in tow, following Trump’s summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska. The guests argue that while leadership optics matter—Trump’s display with bombers and a red-carpet welcome—the substance is how to end the war on terms Ukraine can survive. They suggest Kyiv risks conceding territory, while Washington hopes to “stop the bleeding” and avoid a broader superpower confrontation. They note Europe’s presence signals a shared stake, but warn the outcome remains uncertain as Zelenskiy seeks robust security guarantees and the United States weighs what to commit. The panel stresses the conversation is about ending a costly conflict, not scoring political points, and they highlight that the Europeans are in the room not to police Trump but to participate in hopeful diplomacy. { } Walter and Megyn debate how the media has reacted to the Alaska meeting. They point to a narrative that Trump is being “bullied” or manipulated by Putin, while some outlets cast Trump’s diplomacy as weakness. A recurring thread is frustration with coverage that frames the gathering as legitimate theater rather than a real effort to broker peace, and the co-hosts push back on what they see as hypercritical spin. They argue that the press often treats Trump’s gestures—such as inviting European allies and meeting Putin—as signs of weakness, while ignoring the potential for real change on the ground. They also discuss the broader Russiagate discourse, noting how commentators on MSNBC and elsewhere have framed Trump as a possible asset to Russia, and they challenge the notion that the media is neutrally reporting on the episode. The conversation touches on Epstein, Hillary Clinton’s Nobel Prize chatter, and the idea that media narratives sometimes pivot to distract from other stories, underscoring a broader skepticism about how political coverage shapes public perception rather than simply reports facts. Idiosyncratic cultural commentary and fringe debates emerge as Walter and Megyn shift to domestic media culture. They critique a Bill Maher segment where liberals and conservatives spar over Russia, and they reprise hot takes about the Epstein affair and its treatment by the press. They also spotlight debates around Gloria Gaynor’s Kennedy Center honor, with conservative critics arguing that Trump’s DEI-driven picks politicize the arts, while others defend the choice as recognizing achievement regardless of political posture. The segment on Surrounded features Amanda Seals arguing reparations are necessary, countered by black conservatives who challenge what they see as essentialized racial narratives. The overall tone emphasizes media polarization, cultural fault lines, and the risk that performance and identity politics eclipse substantive policy discussion, while leaving room for cautious optimism about peace talks and a potential shift in public discourse.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the absurdity of the ongoing classified documents saga involving Trump, Biden, and Pence. She highlights Hollywood's renewed attacks on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, with a new documentary claiming to have more tips and potential accusers. Victor Davis Hanson joins the discussion, emphasizing the differences in how the media portrays the classified documents cases of Trump, Biden, and Pence, arguing that Biden's situation is more serious due to his long possession of documents and lack of transparency. Hanson critiques the FBI's handling of the investigations, suggesting that the agency's actions have been politically motivated and inconsistent. He raises concerns about Hunter Biden's potential access to classified documents and the implications for Joe Biden's presidency. The conversation shifts to the political ramifications of the investigations, with Hanson suggesting that if evidence emerges linking Hunter to the documents, it could jeopardize Biden's re-election chances. The discussion then turns to the recent developments in Ukraine, with the U.S. agreeing to send tanks to support Ukraine against Russia. Hanson expresses concerns about the escalation of the conflict and the implications for U.S. security, noting that the ongoing war is the largest conventional conflict since the Korean War. He warns that the U.S. is depleting its military resources while trying to support Ukraine, raising questions about the long-term strategy and consequences of such involvement. Kelly and Hanson also address the immigration crisis, highlighting the alarming statistics of sex offenders and individuals on terror watch lists crossing the border. Hanson shares personal anecdotes about the impact of illegal immigration in rural California, emphasizing the dangers posed by cartels and the lack of law enforcement response. The segment concludes with a discussion of Mike Pompeo's new book, "Never Give an Inch," where he addresses his time in the Trump administration and the challenges faced regarding foreign policy, particularly with China and Saudi Arabia. Pompeo defends his decisions, including the handling of Khashoggi's murder, arguing that maintaining relationships with key allies is crucial for U.S. security. He expresses confidence in the need for a strong stance against the Chinese Communist Party and reflects on the complexities of international relations during his tenure.

Megyn Kelly discusses the current political landscape, focusing on President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet picks, particularly Congressman Matt Gates as Attorney General. She notes the backlash Gates is facing from various political factions, including the media and some Republicans. Dan Tantine, a former Democratic strategist, expresses concern that Democrats are not fully grasping the implications of recent electoral losses, particularly regarding cultural issues like transgender rights, which Republicans have capitalized on during the election cycle. Tantine highlights the significant spending by Republicans on anti-trans ads, which have created a false perception of a crisis regarding transgender athletes in schools. Kelly counters with examples of incidents involving transgender athletes that have raised safety concerns among female athletes. The discussion shifts to the GOP, where Mark Halperin comments on Gates' diminishing chances of confirmation, citing Trump's recent remarks suggesting uncertainty about Gates' support in the Senate. Halperin and Tantine analyze the implications of Trump's cabinet choices, including RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard, and the potential fallout from Gates' nomination. They discuss the broader implications of Trump's influence on the Republican Party, emphasizing the need for GOP senators to navigate their relationships with Trump and the party's base carefully. The conversation also touches on the media's portrayal of Trump and the Democrats' struggle to adapt to the changing political landscape. Kelly criticizes the media's failure to acknowledge the reasons behind Trump's popularity and the need for Democrats to engage with voters more effectively. The discussion concludes with a focus on the upcoming challenges for both parties as they prepare for the next election cycle, emphasizing the importance of understanding the electorate's sentiments and the need for strategic adjustments. Richie McGuinness, a journalist and author, joins the show to discuss his book "Riot Diet," detailing his experiences covering civil unrest during the summer of 2020. He reflects on the motivations of protesters from various backgrounds and the impact of media narratives on public perception. McGuinness shares insights into the dynamics of protests, the role of tribalism, and the emotional toll of witnessing violence firsthand. He emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of the underlying issues driving unrest in America, advocating for a more nuanced approach to addressing societal discontent.

In episode 509, Patrick Bet-David hosts Will Cain, discussing various current events and political topics. They begin by addressing Pete Hegseth's new job and the backlash he faces regarding his tattoos, which some critics associate with white supremacy. Hegseth defends himself, claiming the criticism is defamatory and rooted in anti-Christian bigotry. The conversation shifts to Bobby Kennedy Jr., whose controversial views on vaccines have impacted stock prices in the pharmaceutical and processed food industries. The hosts note that Kennedy's nomination as Secretary of Health and Human Services has caused significant market reactions, with major food companies seeing stock drops. The discussion also touches on the political landscape, including Trump's potential cabinet appointments, with excitement around figures like RFK Jr. and Matt Gaetz. The hosts express skepticism about the current administration's handling of the Ukraine-Russia conflict, emphasizing the risks of escalating tensions under Biden's leadership. They highlight the importance of strong leadership in negotiating peace, suggesting that Trump's approach may lead to a quicker resolution. In a segment on housing, they discuss the rising trend of young adults relying on parental support for home purchases, attributing it to skyrocketing housing prices and a lack of affordable starter homes. The hosts argue that the current housing market is unsustainable and propose that more affordable housing options need to be developed to support younger generations. The conversation shifts to sports, comparing the viewership of the World Series in Japan to the NBA Finals in the U.S. They attribute the World Series' success to star players and major markets, while criticizing the NBA for its cultural leanings and lack of engaging star power. Shaquille O'Neal's comments about the detrimental impact of the three-point shot on basketball are discussed, with the hosts agreeing that the NBA's focus on star-driven narratives has hurt its popularity. Finally, they touch on the implications of AI in Hollywood, with Ben Affleck's insights on how AI may change filmmaking but not replace the artistry of human actors. The episode concludes with reflections on the current state of sports and politics, emphasizing the need for authenticity and engaging narratives in both arenas.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the political fallout from the recent Oval Office meeting between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky, emphasizing the unexpected twists in reactions, particularly from the left. She transitions to a lighter topic, the Academy Awards, critiquing Hollywood's current state and its adherence to wokeism, highlighting the absence of the biopic on Ronald Reagan from the nominations due to diversity quotas. Kelly invites influencers Lauren Chen and Christian Toto to discuss the Oscars, noting the tension between Oprah Winfrey and Whoopi Goldberg during a tribute to Quincy Jones. They comment on the self-centeredness of celebrities, with Chen criticizing their virtue signaling while ignoring real issues like homelessness. The conversation shifts to Selena Gomez's extravagant appearance at the Oscars, with Toto mocking her claims of solidarity with immigrants despite her wealth. The hosts critique the hypocrisy of celebrities like Julianne Hough, who previously wore blackface but now engages in land acknowledgments, and discuss the provocative outfits worn by attendees, questioning the lack of substance in their presentations. They express disappointment in the Oscars' focus on superficiality rather than meaningful art. The discussion turns to the documentary category, with Kelly criticizing the win for "No Other Land," which presents a one-sided view of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, contrasting it with the lack of attention given to anti-Semitism in Hollywood speeches. They lament the industry's failure to address pressing issues and the dilution of important topics into vague statements. Kelly and her guests analyze the recent Trump-Zelensky meeting, arguing that Zelensky's confrontational approach was misguided and likely influenced by Democratic senators who met with him beforehand. They suggest that the Democrats' attempts to frame the meeting as an ambush are disingenuous, as Zelensky's behavior was provocative and disrespectful. Andrew Klavan joins the discussion, asserting that the meeting was a significant moment reflecting the disconnect between Hollywood and the American public. He argues that Trump’s approach to foreign policy, particularly regarding China, is more strategic than the Democrats acknowledge. Klavan emphasizes the need for a shift in how the U.S. engages with global conflicts, advocating for a focus on cutting losses rather than endless military involvement. The conversation concludes with a critique of Andrew Cuomo's potential return to politics, highlighting his controversial past and the lack of support he would face. Kelly and Klavan express skepticism about his chances, suggesting that New Yorkers deserve better leadership.