reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In the early 1990s, Trump’s Atlantic City Holdings and other ventures dragged down his business empire, leading to bankruptcy. To secure a bailout, he was aided by Wilbur Ross, who later became commerce secretary under Trump. At that time, Wilbur Ross represented the Rothschild banking interests. The Rothschilds, specifically the Wall Street mergers and acquisitions arm they opened in the 1980s, were responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. The narrative asserts that Trump, as a business icon, would not have existed beyond the early 1990s if it weren’t for the Rothschild banking interests, which are described as having extensive affiliations with people in the Epstein network. The transcript links Epstein’s financial crimes to currency speculation described by the New York Times as a “currency speculation cabal,” and names individuals such as Jamie Goldsmith as being backed by the Rothschilds, as well as George Soros, whose Quantum Fund in the late 1960s was bankrolled by French Rothschild interests. The account emphasizes a long and storied history between the Rothschild family and Zionism, including the establishment of the state of Israel, and portrays the Rothschilds as major patrons of that cause. It concludes by suggesting that the Rothschilds have had substantial influence over Trump, asserting that Trump owes them a great deal. Overall, the narrative draws a chain of connections: the Rothschild banking interests’ influence helped shape Trump’s rise and persistence as a prominent business figure, with Wilbur Ross’s bailout role in the 1990s serving as a pivotal link, and various high-profile financial networks—Epstein-related cohorts, currency speculation participants, and financiers like Jamie Goldsmith and George Soros—being connected to Rothschilds. It also foregrounds the Rothschilds’ historical ties to Zionism and the establishment of Israel as part of their influence, asserting that these relationships have translated into ongoing sway over Trump.

In 2008, I faced a tough decision with around $30-40 million left. I had two options: invest it all in one company and let the other one fail, or split the money between both companies and risk losing both. It was like choosing which child to let starve. Unable to make that choice, I decided to divide the money between them. Luckily, both companies managed to succeed in the end.

Speaker 1: Well, the intersection with the global financial crisis specifically is a wild story that to be truly told, you need to put the evidence on screen as well. But the short version is that he had a company called Liquid Funding Limited that was domiciled in The Bahamas that was partially owned by Bear Stearns. And Bear Stearns, you know, is where he had come up for a long time. And Liquid Funding Limited was selling CDOs, the same types of CDOs that eventually caused the global financial crisis. It was capitalized at, I believe, dollars 100,000,000 and allowed to sell $20,000,000,000 with a B of CDOs. Speaker 1: And I actually just was looking at that statistic earlier today because this is the craziest story. And that little CDO factory that Jeffrey Epstein was running tied into Bear Stearns. And if you recall, Bear Stearns was one of the, you know, the first to collapse, right? That shut down in the months directly preceding Bear Stearns starting to collapse. And Jeffrey Epstein redeemed all of those CDOs, all of those assets. Speaker 1: The terms are I don't know the technical terms for what he did. But basically, he made a run on the bank on those exact assets that were the exact problem. And he was tied into the exact bank that was financially distressed. And then he wound that whole company, Liquid Funding Limited, up and disappeared. And later, JPMorgan, the bank that he later worked with after, you know, Bear Stearns was his early banking career, and then he later was doing all of his money laundering and banking and referring of people at JPMorgan, They came in, swooped up Bear Stearns for pennies on the dollar. Speaker 1: They also later spun Liquid Funding Limited back up. There's a whole There's a very overt financial paper trail that Jeffrey Epstein was better acquainted with the problem than almost anyone in the world because he was deeply enmeshed in Bear Stearns and knew the leadership of Bear Stearns very well. And he understood CDOs, he was selling CDOs. And then he just so happens to wind his whole shop up and close it down and redeem it all right at the moment when things are about to go bust. So, that's a wild rabbit hole, and it's very interesting. Speaker 0: I mean, what is that? I mean, that suggests Well, it doesn't suggest it's like direct evidence of, if I'm assuming we can verify what you're saying, that the biggest events in the world are actually not quite as organic or accidental as we're led to believe and that, you know, this is like puppet master stuff. Mean, it is. I don't know what to say. I don't want this to be true, Speaker 1: but Speaker 0: that's what it looks

After 9/11, I visited the Pentagon and was told we were going to war with Iraq, even though there was no connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda. The explanation was that we had a strong military and could take down governments. I later learned of a memo detailing plans to take out seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. I also had the opportunity to acquire the Twin Towers, which turned out to be very fortunate for my family. After 9/11, I was lucky to avoid going downtown that day. I had the obligation to collect insurance proceeds and got help from Governor Elliot Spitzer to get $4.5 billion. Some people believe that around 4,000 Israelis were warned not to go to work on 9/11.

The speaker outlines a project to map US State Department involvement with George Soros, The Open Society Foundations, and related entities across many countries, noting that the WikiLeaks cables (Kissinger, Carter, and Cablegate) cover 1973–2010 but omit the 1980s and 1990s. The goal is to create a comprehensive picture of how US policy has aligned with “George Soros, The Open Society Foundation, The Open Society Institute, every open society spandrel in every country.” The speaker highlights that Strobe Talbott in 1995 said US foreign policy had to be synchronized with allied governments and with Soros, describing it as “like working with a friendly, allied, independent entity, if not a government,” and stating that Soros then became “the number one political downer.” The narrative begins with precedents before the Open Society Foundation’s creation in 1979. In 1973–1975, Soros references appear in cables before the Open Society Foundation started. The speaker then focuses on a troubling example from 1976 in Gabon, via a Kissinger cable titled Visit by Brown and Root Executives to Gabon. Brown and Root, later Halliburton, is connected to George Soros through Brown and Root’s executives and projects. The CIA’s reaction to a Ramparts article about Brown and Root is discussed, showing Herman Brown (founder of Brown and Root) and his son George Rufus Brown as covert associates with the CIA under project LP coin, with Herman Brown serving as president and director of Brown and Root and trustee of the Brown Foundation. The claim is that both Herman Brown and his son had covert security clearances and were involved with CIA projects from 1965–1967, including potential service on the board of a CIA creation in Thailand/Laos. Brown and Root is described as one of Soros’s top five holdings in the mid-2000s, implying a CIA-connected origin for the company. A note is given that in Gabon, Soros Associates (founded by Paul Soros, George Soros’s older brother) is involved in port projects. Paul Soros’s shipping and engineering influence is illustrated by a Washington Post obituary, and the speaker mentions a related anecdote from Bill Burns’s autobiography The Back Channel about embassy construction projects in Russia being prebugged, and the implication that Western engineering firms with ties to intelligence could have facilitated spying. Before Open Society Foundations existed, in June 1975 Bandar Abbas Port Project in Iran involved three senior Dravo Corporation executives, plus International Systems, Van Houten Associates, and Soros Associates. The embassy was instructed to assist American bidders to ensure Soros Associates’ bid, noting Soros Associates’ engineering focus and the aim to eliminate competing bids. The government of Iran’s consideration of the American group and the influence of Soros’s bid on Iran’s judgment are documented. In Gabon, 1975–1976, financing arrangements are described: a financing package for Soros’s contract including a down payment by the Gabonese governor, an Export-Import Bank direct loan, and a First National City Bank loan, with the U.S. embassy consulting to emphasize more favorable terms and to potentially extend financing into a larger package. The accounts emphasize multiple U.S. government roles: Commerce Department, State Department, Export-Import Bank, and embassies, colluding to support Soros financing and projects, with the claim that this occurred years before the Open Society Foundations were created and began collaborating with U.S. agencies. The speaker suggests a long-standing family involvement, with older brother Paul Soros already coordinating with the State Department to secure deals for Soros Associates before 1979. The Mongolia story is promised as a later highlight. The compilation is framed as a five-decade pattern of government support for Soros-related deals, starting in 1973 and continuing through the Cablegate era.

I worked with many Israeli prime ministers and had the idea to own the Twin Towers. Luckily, the governor of New York, George Pataki, decided to privatize the World Trade Center. I received a call from the governor's office asking if I would consider owning it. This turned out to be very beneficial for my family. On the morning of 9/11, I was getting ready to go to the dermatologist and was advised not to go downtown. We were fortunate to collect insurance proceeds, thanks to the help of the newly elected governor, Elliot Spitzer. He listened to me and ensured I received $4.5 billion within six months.

Specifically, I set out to buy credit default swaps on subordinated tranches of subprime residential mortgage backed securities. We would ultimately use nine different Wall Street dealer counterparties. To be clear well, first I'd say Lehman and Baer, I avoided for obvious reasons, even back then. Goldman Sachs featured very prominently early on. They were a very anxious crew. To be clear, these credit default swaps that I'm buying would rise in value as mortgages are written off and the value of these tranches fell. Goldman Sachs in the spring of 'seven appeared to us to want to make its trade bigger. They wanted a bigger piece of the big short. A lower price, therefore, would benefit Goldman Sachs, and that's how Wall Street works. Incredibly, it would later be reported that more than $60,000,000,000,000, $60,000,000,000,000 in credit derivatives were in effect at the peak.

I recount a meeting I had with a board at Safeguard Scientifics, where a firm co-located with them had a board member present. I demonstrated what was possible if we reengineered the government money, arguing there was enormous opportunity to build vast financial equity gains and capital gains, and that pension funds could profit by reengineering how the federal budget worked to create a more productive economy. The president of the largest pension fund in the country attended and told me, “you don’t understand.” He explained that this is what they had tried to do when he was younger, working with a group of activists, and they were able to stop them. I naively said, “you didn’t have the Internet. You couldn’t get the learning speeds up locally high enough to jump the curve.” He froze, looked at me, and said, “you don’t understand. It’s too late.” I asked, “what do you mean it’s too late?” He replied, “it’s too late. They’ve given up on the country and they’re gonna move all the money out of the country starting in the fall.” He said, “you’ve got to get to Nick Brady.” Brady had been the chairman of the firm I was a partner at on Wall Street and later became secretary of the treasury in the first Bush administration, known as a leader in how the financial system runs. So the instruction was to get to Nick Brady. I thought the message meant we had been directed to reallocate equity in the pension funds to emerging market investments, which made sense because growth rates in Asia and emerging markets exceeded those in mature economies. But then, at the outset, he mentioned “they’re moving all the money out starting the fall.” That fall marked the beginning of fiscal 1998, when enormous amounts of money began disappearing from my old agencies, HUD and the Department of Defense. What I later came to believe, and we have a website dedicated to presenting documents and analysis on this, is missingmoney.salaire.com. I realized that what he was referring to was a financial coup—an attempt to end the system where bankers controlled monetary policy while the people’s representatives controlled fiscal policy, and instead move to a process in which bankers controlled both. Rather than pursuing new legislation, they would leverage debt, issue vast debt, and siphon money out the back door, effectively conducting a financial coup d’etat, which is what I think has happened.

I studied economics at Harvard and made money by betting against Home Shopping Network stock. This led me to learn about derivatives and start a hedge fund in 1987 with $265,000. Despite starting just before the crash of '87, our portfolio thrived in market volatility, attracting more capital.

As president of The United States, I will always support Jewish Americans and I was always I will always be a friend and a champion to the Jewish people. I have been and I will say, you know, if you go back ten, twelve, fifteen years ago at the most, the strongest lobby in Washington was the Jewish lobby. It was Israel. That's no longer true. You have to be very careful. You have a congress in particular, which is becoming anti Semitic. You have AOC plus three. You have those people. Ilhan Omar, she hates Jewish people. And you have to be very careful because there's been a big change. You know, if you go back fifteen years ago, I'm not Jewish, but my father was very friendly with many, many Jewish people. He was honored by federation. I would go with him to federation of Jewish philanthropies and many other things. And, we grew up respecting and loving Jewish people. You know, you don't even think about it, in Brooklyn, in Queens mostly. And my father didn't go to Manhattan. He never went to Manhattan from the standpoint. He could never understand how in Brooklyn you could buy a piece of land for $3 a foot and how in Manhattan you had to pay a thousand dollars a foot. He said, I can't get that. I don't like it. I like to buy it for 3. So it was different. It's a different thinking. In a way, I'm glad he didn't do that because he let me have some of that fun. And it was I had a lot of fun in Manhattan. We did great. But my father would tell me the most powerful lobby that there is in this country is the Jewish lobby. It's the Israeli lobby. It's not that way anymore. You have a lot of people in your way. You have a lot of people that, don't wanna help Israel. You have a lot of people in congress that don't like Israel. You have a lot of people in congress that, in a way, I think, Mike, we could say it. Right? You're there. You're doing an amazing job, Mike Lawlor. You they hate they hate Israel. They hate Israel. And if you would have told me fifteen years ago that that was possible, Jason, I would have said there's no way. There's no way that's possible. But it's happening. And, obviously, it's getting progressively worse. Less so in the Senate, but the Senate's starting also. You get glimmers, you know, when I'm in the back rooms talking to people. You get glimmers of statements that you say, woah, where did that come from? So we have to be, Sid, we have to be very careful because it's bad things are happening. And then you see what goes on in Australia or October 7. How about October 7? And then you have people that deny it ever happened. How about the people that deny like, they deny the Holocaust, but, you know, you figure, well, that's just many years. Well, October 7 is not many years at all. And you have people that deny October's I saw tape that I wish I never saw it, actually. I wish I never saw it. I got to see tape that some of you got to see. But as president, I got to see things I wish I never saw. But there's no denying it. But then they'll say, oh, the tape was a rigged tape. It was a tape that never existed. They made it up. It's just propaganda. I don't know if they believe it. I don't think they believe it, but you have to be very, very careful. Bad things are happening, and we're not gonna let that happen. Well, I'm president and the DOJ and Harmeet, we're not we're not gonna let it happen. But please, please be vigilant and careful because you have some bad people that, are now in congress that were unthinkable unthinkable to be in congress twelve, thirteen, fourteen years ago, fifteen years ago. Within

Rothschild Asset Management was mentioned. According to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, thousands of Israelis were warned about 9/11, with 4,000 expected to be at the World Trade Center or the Pentagon that day. The warning was reportedly sent through a messaging system called Odigo. The message warned people not to be at the World Trade Center at 8:45 because all hell would break loose. The speaker claims that the 4,000 Israelis who avoided harm received this warning.

Speaker 0 contends that the entire Jeffrey Epstein story can be explained if Ace Greenberg brought Jeffrey Epstein into the BCCI deals at Bear Stearns. This, he says, would explain Epstein’s meteoric rise and why many were charmed by him, suggesting the charm was not genuine. He asserts that by 1982 Epstein was already meeting with major intelligence figures, including the CIA, MI6, and Saudi intelligence officials, as well as Doug Lee, Stan Pottinger, Adnan Khashoggi, and Middle Eastern sheiks. The claim is that Epstein handled BCCI at Bear Stearns, disguising illegal weapon sales as complex financial transactions for commodities or oil, which, he argues, explains Epstein’s specialty in complex financial transactions and why he was put on the BCCI account. The narrative connects Epstein’s work with Edgar Bronfman, claiming BCCI was helping US, Saudi, British, and Israeli interests in the Iran-Iraq affair and in Afghanistan. This, he says, explains how Epstein was protected whenever he encountered fraud trouble and that the justice department took action against him for securities violations, yet Epstein publicly stated in court that Bear Stearns was secretly moving money for the CIA, a claim he asserts cannot be disclosed in open court, hence the decision not to prosecute. Further, he claims Epstein had French intelligence connections, British intelligence connections, Israeli intelligence connections, and Saudi intelligence connections, all linked to his broader CIA connections. He ties these networks back to the Safari Club network of the late 1970s, which he says later scaled up into BCCI.

I studied economics at Harvard and made money by betting against Home Shopping Network stock. This led me to learn about derivatives and start a hedge fund in 1987 with $265,000. Equipped with technology like a fax machine and a satellite dish, I navigated the market crash of '87 successfully. Our fund grew to manage $1,000,000 in capital.

I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity to own the Twin Towers when the governor of New York decided to privatize the World Trade Center. On the morning of 9/11, I was getting ready to go to the dermatologist and luckily avoided going downtown. After the tragedy, I needed help collecting insurance proceeds, so I reached out to the newly elected governor, Elliot Spitzer, who was a friend. He listened and managed to secure $4.5 billion for me within six months. Overall, we were very lucky throughout these events.

Joe, who ran a hedge fund, failed to hedge the position for 8 years. The hedge would have allowed them to benefit from the upside without any downside. This missed opportunity caused pain for everyone else, but they could have capitalized on it and potentially gained more talent. Instead of having 4.5 million, they could have had 12 million. It would have been better for them if the market went down because they would have been stronger compared to weaker players. Either way, they would have been protected.

In Atlantic City, Donald Trump acquired three casinos. Despite the risk of overexpansion, he continued to build and enlarge his brand, attracting numerous banks. By the time the banks realized he was nearly a billion dollars in debt, he had become too big to foreclose on.