reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Welcome to the Megyn Kelly show. Megyn reflects on her vacation in Montana and expresses excitement to return to the show. She discusses the evolving understanding of COVID-19, emphasizing that vaccinated individuals can still catch and spread the virus, and that lockdowns and school closures have been unnecessary. She notes that hospitalizations and deaths are the relevant metrics, not case numbers, and argues that society must learn to live with COVID. Megyn critiques media figures like Nicole Wallace and President Biden for their shifting narratives on COVID, highlighting that the pandemic's realities are becoming clearer even to those who previously adhered to strict measures. She mentions Dr. Fauci's recent acknowledgment that the focus should shift from case numbers to hospitalizations and the need for balance in public health policies. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya joins the discussion, sharing insights from the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated for focused protection of vulnerable populations rather than broad lockdowns. He discusses the early miscalculations regarding COVID's spread and the need for a more rational approach to managing the virus. The conversation shifts to the Omicron variant, which appears to be milder than previous strains. Bhattacharya emphasizes that while vaccination is important for vulnerable groups, the current vaccine mandates are unjustified, especially given the mild nature of Omicron. He argues that the focus should be on protecting those at risk rather than imposing strict mandates on the general population. Megyn and Bhattacharya discuss the politicization of public health and the need for trust in health institutions. They also address the ongoing debate around mask mandates, testing, and the implications of vaccine boosters for young people, particularly regarding potential side effects. The show then transitions to a discussion about the controversy surrounding transgender swimmer Leah Thomas, with guests Cynthia Millen and Nancy Hogshead-Makar. They express concerns about fairness in women's sports, arguing that allowing transgender women to compete against biological women undermines the integrity of female athletics. Millen recounts her resignation from USA Swimming in protest of the current policies, while Hogshead-Makar highlights the need for separate categories to ensure fair competition. The conversation concludes with a focus on the implications of these policies for young female athletes and the broader societal impact of prioritizing inclusion over fairness in sports. Megyn emphasizes the importance of protecting women's rights in athletics and the need for a balanced approach to inclusion that does not disadvantage biological women.

Riley Gaines recounts her experiences as a competitive swimmer and her advocacy for women's rights in sports, particularly in light of transgender athletes competing in women's categories. She describes a troubling incident at San Francisco State University, where she was invited to speak about her experiences. Upon arrival, she found herself in a hostile environment, with protesters outside chanting slogans against her views. Despite being prepared for opposition, the situation escalated when a mob of protesters stormed the room, turning off the lights and creating chaos. Gaines was approached by an officer who did not identify herself, leading to confusion and distrust. As the mob grew outside, she was barricaded in a room for over three hours, fearing for her safety. The protesters yelled threats and expressed their desire to confront her directly. The campus police were hesitant to intervene, fearing backlash and accusations of discrimination. During her speech, Gaines shared her journey as an athlete, the sacrifices she made, and the challenges faced by female athletes competing against transgender women. She highlighted the unfairness of allowing a biological male, Leah Thomas, to compete in women's events, emphasizing the impact on female athletes' opportunities and mental health. Gaines expressed heartbreak for her fellow competitors who felt their hard work was undermined. After the event, the university administration sent an email praising the protesters for their "bravery," further illustrating the disconnect between the administration and the concerns of female athletes. Gaines remains committed to advocating for women's sports, testifying in various legislative settings, and raising awareness about the implications of allowing transgender women to compete against biological females. She believes that accountability and acknowledgment of the harm caused to women in sports are crucial for future changes. Despite the challenges, she feels empowered to continue her fight for fairness and equality in athletics.

In this episode, the hosts announce an extensive giveaway, including skincare products from Caldera, and encourage listeners to comment on their discussion about transgender athletes in the Olympics for a chance to win. They also remind viewers of a limited-time sale on fitness products. The conversation shifts to humorous anecdotes about personal experiences, including wardrobe mishaps and the challenges of maintaining clothing. They discuss the Vuori event they attended, highlighting the positive atmosphere and interactions with fellow fitness enthusiasts. The hosts delve into the topic of transgender athletes, specifically Laurel Hubbard, who is set to compete in the Olympics. They express concerns about fairness in competition, noting that biological males may retain advantages even after transitioning. The discussion touches on the complexities of gender identity and the implications for women's sports, with the hosts acknowledging the emotional and political dimensions of the issue. They also reflect on the societal changes surrounding these discussions, suggesting that as more transgender athletes emerge, there may be a push for separate categories in sports. The hosts emphasize the importance of recognizing the advantages that biological males may have, despite the desire for inclusivity. The episode further explores the impact of stress on muscle gains and the benefits of meditation in reducing stress, which can enhance overall health and fitness outcomes. They discuss shoulder winging and its implications for shoulder function, offering practical exercises to address this issue. Lastly, the hosts touch on the benefits of non-stimulant pre-workouts and the importance of proper nutrition and hydration for optimal performance. They highlight the significance of sodium intake, especially for those transitioning to healthier diets, and share personal experiences with vitamin D supplementation. The episode concludes with a reminder for listeners to check out their free resources on the Mind Pump website.

Megyn Kelly opens the show with breaking news about OJ Simpson's death at 76 due to cancer. His family announced his passing, highlighting his battle with prostate cancer. OJ Simpson, once a beloved sports figure and actor, became infamous for the 1994 murder trial of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. The trial captivated the nation, revealing the brutality of the murders and sparking discussions about race and justice in America. OJ was acquitted in 1995, a verdict that divided the country and highlighted deep-seated racial tensions. He was later found liable for wrongful death in a civil suit and faced legal troubles, including a conviction for armed robbery in 2008, serving nine years before his release in 2017. Kelly transitions to a legal discussion with lawyers Viva Frei and Phil Holloway, who reflect on OJ's legacy and the implications of his trial. They discuss how the trial's outcome was influenced by public perception and the prosecution's mistakes, particularly regarding the handling of evidence. The conversation shifts to current legal matters, including Donald Trump's upcoming criminal trial related to hush money payments. The hosts express concerns about the fairness of the trial in Manhattan, suggesting that political bias may affect the proceedings. The discussion continues with the implications of Trump's legal challenges on the upcoming election, emphasizing how a conviction could impact his support among Republicans and Independents. They analyze the political landscape, noting that Trump's legal troubles could be seen as election interference. The conversation then shifts to cultural issues, particularly the impact of transgender policies on women's spaces and sports. Kelly and her guests discuss incidents involving male athletes competing in women's sports and the implications for female athletes. They express concerns about the safety and fairness of allowing transgender women to compete against biological women, citing specific examples of injuries and discomfort experienced by female athletes. The hosts also address the broader societal implications of gender ideology, emphasizing the need to protect women's rights and spaces. They critique the normalization of men in women's locker rooms and the potential dangers posed by such policies. The show concludes with a discussion on mental health, particularly the over-prescription of SSRIs to young people. The guests share personal experiences and concerns about the medicalization of emotions, advocating for a more holistic approach to mental health that addresses root causes rather than relying solely on medication. They emphasize the importance of understanding and managing emotions without resorting to quick fixes. Overall, the episode covers a range of topics, from legal issues surrounding high-profile cases to cultural debates about gender and mental health, highlighting the complexities and challenges facing society today.

Riley Gaines, a former collegiate swimmer, gained prominence after competing against Leah Thomas, a transgender athlete, in the NCAA finals. Despite placing fifth, Gaines faced backlash for speaking out against the unfairness of allowing transgender women to compete in women's sports. In her new book, "Swimming Against the Current: Fighting for Common Sense in a World That's Lost Its Mind," she shares her experiences and advocates for fairness in athletics. Gaines recounts a pivotal moment when she was assaulted during a protest, which solidified her commitment to fighting for women's rights in sports. She emphasizes that there are two sexes and that both deserve equal opportunities and safety. Gaines highlights the emotional toll on female athletes who feel their rights and privacy are being violated, particularly in locker rooms. She discusses recent legal cases, including a West Virginia court ruling against a young girl competing against a transgender student, illustrating the broader implications of these policies. Gaines argues that the current narrative dismisses the concerns of female athletes, who are often silenced. She calls for a return to fairness and safety in sports, urging society to recognize the inherent advantages that biological males possess.

Listeners are confronted with a heated debate sparked by a World's Strongest Woman competition where Jamie Booker, a transgender woman, defeated competitors described as biologically female. The clip montage presents a spectrum of reactions: supporters insisting the athlete trained hard and deserves recognition, critics arguing that biological males hold unfair physical advantages, and commentators invoking fairness, safety of women’s competitions, and the integrity of sport. Personal stories surface, such as competitors who felt robbed of opportunities and funding, and experts draw analogies to steroids and gender transition timing. Throughout, the discourse oscillates between calls for inclusion and demands for a separate category or stricter eligibility standards. While some voices emphasize respect for individual identity, others insist that performance advantages should not determine who can compete in female divisions. The piece highlights the broader tension between inclusivity and fairness in athletic competition.

Riley Gaines discusses her experiences as a former NCAA swimmer and the challenges posed by transgender athletes competing in women's sports. She highlights the recent backlash from feminist organizations, including being labeled a "white supremacist patriarch" by the National Organization of Women, despite her advocacy for women's rights. Gaines recounts her competitive journey, emphasizing her achievements and the unfairness she faced when competing against Leah Thomas, a transgender woman who dominated women's swimming after previously ranking poorly among male competitors. She expresses frustration over the NCAA's policies and the lack of support from feminist groups, noting that many are now undermining sex-based protections. Gaines argues that the current situation is regressive and detrimental to women's sports, emphasizing the need for fairness and safety. She also reflects on the broader cultural implications of gender ideology, asserting that the fight for women's rights is being overshadowed by political agendas. Ultimately, she finds purpose in her advocacy, despite the challenges and backlash she faces.

Riley Gaines discusses her unexpected journey as an advocate for women's sports, particularly in response to the inclusion of transgender women in female competitions. She shares her background as a dedicated swimmer from a family of athletes and recounts her experiences during college, including the impact of COVID-19 on her training and competitions. Gaines describes the moment she learned about Leah Thomas, a transgender woman who competed on the women's swimming team after previously swimming on the men's team. She expresses her shock and concern over the NCAA's decision to allow Thomas to compete, emphasizing the unfairness of the situation and the lack of support for female athletes. Throughout the conversation, Gaines highlights the physical advantages that biological males have over females in sports and the implications for women's rights and safety. She recounts her experiences at competitions where she felt uncomfortable due to the presence of transgender athletes and the reactions from her peers and coaches. Gaines also discusses the broader societal implications of the current discourse around gender identity, including the challenges faced by women in advocating for their rights. She emphasizes the importance of standing up for women's sports and the need for clarity in defining terms related to gender. The conversation touches on the cultural and political climate surrounding these issues, with Gaines expressing frustration over the silencing of dissenting voices and the manipulation of language to promote certain ideologies. She encourages individuals to find their voices and advocate for fairness in sports and society. Gaines concludes by discussing her upcoming book, "Swimming Against the Current," which details her experiences and perspectives on the ongoing debates surrounding gender and sports. She expresses gratitude for the opportunity to share her story and reach a wider audience.

Megyn Kelly opens the show by highlighting an inspirational guest from the previous episode, Navy SEAL Jason Redman, who embodies resilience and positivity despite his traumatic experiences. She announces an upcoming exclusive interview with two prominent female cyclists discussing the impact of transgender ideology on women's cycling. The conversation shifts to Michael Knowles, who joins Megyn to discuss various societal issues, including the ongoing controversies surrounding Target's Pride displays and the implications of transgender ideology in sports. They express concern over how these issues are affecting children and the broader implications for society. Knowles critiques the pervasive nature of Pride displays, suggesting they reflect a broader ideological push that may alienate many, including those within the LGBTQ community. They discuss Canadian actress Rachelle Lefevre's outrage over Target moving its Pride displays to the back of some stores, arguing that children are more concerned with other things than the political implications of such displays. Knowles emphasizes that the push for inclusivity often overlooks the voices of women, particularly in sports, where fairness is at stake. The discussion then turns to the challenges faced by female athletes due to the inclusion of transgender women in women's sports. Inga Thompson, a retired cyclist, and Hannah Arensman, a young champion, share their experiences and frustrations regarding the unfairness of allowing biological males to compete against women. They highlight the lack of representation for women in discussions about these policies and the pressure to remain silent for fear of backlash. Thompson recounts her own experience with a cycling team that distanced itself from her after she spoke out, emphasizing the need for women to advocate for their rights in sports. Both women express a desire to protest against the current policies and advocate for fairness in women's cycling. The conversation concludes with a call to action for supporters to wear shirts advocating for women's rights in sports and to participate in upcoming protests. They emphasize the importance of standing up for women's rights and the need for solidarity in the face of growing challenges.

The hosts discuss various current events, starting with Elon Musk deleting a tweet about Jeffrey Epstein, which sparks speculation about his relationship with Donald Trump. They explore the ongoing tensions in Los Angeles, where protests against ICE actions have led to chaos, with Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass facing criticism for their responses. The hosts highlight the contrasting views on protests, with some labeling them as peaceful while others see them as insurrection. They delve into the implications of using Palantir technology for tracking illegal immigrants and the concerns surrounding privacy and government surveillance. The conversation shifts to the political landscape, with Rahm Emanuel warning Democrats about their messaging and potential candidates for the 2028 election. The hosts also touch on the ongoing feud between Riley Gaines and Simone Biles regarding transgender athletes in women's sports, emphasizing the divide in opinions on inclusion and fairness. They conclude with a discussion on relationship dynamics, highlighting communication styles and the importance of tone in resolving conflicts. Lastly, they celebrate Fox News's dominance on YouTube, showcasing their significant viewership compared to other news outlets, and promote upcoming webinars and merchandise for Father's Day.

Megan Kelly opens the show discussing the ongoing controversy surrounding men competing in women's sports, particularly highlighting the case of Algerian male boxer Eain Khalif, who has been boxing against women. She expresses frustration over being labeled transphobic for stating facts about Khalif's biological sex, emphasizing that he is a male competing in women's boxing and has been proven right despite backlash from various media outlets. Kelly mentions a recent incident in California where a male athlete, AB Hernandez, won first place in a girls' track event, forcing the actual female winner to share the podium with him. Link Lauren joins the discussion, recalling his own experiences with backlash for speaking out on the issue. They both criticize California's approach to accommodating transgender athletes in women's sports, arguing it undermines fairness and safety for female athletes. Kelly highlights the hypocrisy of politicians like Gavin Newsom, who claim to support women's rights while allowing men to compete against women. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of transgender athletes in sports, with both hosts expressing concern for young female athletes who are losing opportunities due to the presence of male competitors. They discuss various examples from different states, including Oregon and Minnesota, where female athletes have protested against the inclusion of transgender athletes in their competitions. Kelly also addresses the media's role in perpetuating narratives that dismiss the concerns of female athletes, citing examples of coverage that fails to acknowledge the biological advantages males have in sports. Stephen A. Smith joins the conversation, agreeing with Kelly's points and emphasizing the need for fairness in competition. He suggests that transgender athletes should compete against one another rather than in women's categories. The discussion touches on the political landscape, with Smith criticizing the Democratic Party for taking minority votes for granted and failing to present a compelling alternative to Trump's policies. They conclude by reflecting on the importance of fairness in sports and the need for accountability from both sides of the political spectrum regarding the treatment of women in athletics.

Megyn Kelly discusses ongoing protests in Los Angeles against ICE, with Secretary of Defense Pete Hexath deploying 700 Marines to protect federal buildings. Looters targeted various stores, and some protesters displayed Mexican and Guatemalan flags. President Trump authorized an additional 2,000 National Guard troops, which California Governor Gavin Newsom opposed, claiming Trump exceeded his authority. Newsom's lawsuit against Trump is seen as unlikely to succeed, with NPR acknowledging Trump's legal power in this context. Kelly and guest Miranda Devine criticize Democrats for downplaying the protests and looting, suggesting they are politically motivated. Devine argues that Trump is not panicking but is instead reinforcing his law-and-order stance, which resonates with voters. Polls indicate Trump's approval on immigration has significantly improved compared to his first term, with a majority of Americans supporting the deportation of illegal immigrants. They also discuss the political implications of the protests, asserting that Democrats are alienating voters by appearing to support illegal immigration and failing to enforce laws. Devine highlights the hypocrisy of local leaders who refuse to cooperate with ICE while allowing crime to escalate. In a separate segment, Kelly and Devine critique Simone Biles for attacking Riley Gaines over her comments on transgender athletes in women's sports. They argue that Biles's response reflects a broader trend of celebrities prioritizing political correctness over women's rights. The conversation touches on the cultural implications of women like JLo and Biles seeking validation through provocative displays, which they view as detrimental to societal standards of decency and empowerment.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing E. Jean Carroll's media appearances following her $83 million defamation judgment against Donald Trump. She criticizes Carroll's claims of reputational harm, suggesting that her status has actually risen since the allegations. Kelly highlights a clip of Carroll joking about using Trump's money for personal luxuries rather than women's rights, which she finds distasteful. Glenn Beck joins the discussion, questioning Carroll's credibility and the jury's decision, arguing that the case against Trump is weak and politically motivated. The conversation shifts to the media's portrayal of the verdict, with Kelly and Beck criticizing outlets like MSNBC and The View for celebrating Carroll's win as a victory for women's rights while ignoring the complexities of the situation. They argue that the legal changes enabling Carroll's lawsuit were politically driven and that the media narrative is misleading. Kelly and Beck also touch on the broader political landscape, expressing concerns about the potential for a Michelle Obama candidacy in the next election, suggesting that the Democratic Party may be grooming her as a strong candidate against Trump. They discuss the implications of ongoing legal challenges against Trump and the perception of him as a political martyr. The discussion then moves to current events, including the rise of conspiracy theories surrounding Taylor Swift and the NFL, with Kelly dismissing claims of a coordinated effort to influence the election through celebrity endorsements. Beck emphasizes the need for accountability in government and media, expressing skepticism about the current administration's handling of national security and immigration. The segment concludes with a focus on the transgender debate in sports, particularly Leah Thomas's legal challenges to compete in women's swimming. Kelly and her guests express frustration over the ongoing acceptance of transgender athletes in women's sports, advocating for the protection of women's rights and fair competition. They also highlight the backlash against companies like Rip Curl for replacing female ambassadors with transgender individuals, calling for accountability and support for women in these discussions.

In this episode of the Rubin Report, host Dave Rubin interviews Riley Gaines, a 12-time NCAA All-American swimmer, discussing the ongoing debate around transgender athletes in women's sports. Gaines expresses disbelief that the political left continues to support policies allowing biological males to compete against women, suggesting it harms both women's sports and the broader LGBTQ community. She highlights California Governor Gavin Newsom's recent comments about the age of consent for gender reassignment, arguing he remains evasive and insincere about the implications of his policies. Gaines also reflects on her public confrontation with Simone Biles regarding inclusivity in sports, criticizing Biles for not supporting women’s rights in athletics. She emphasizes that sports should be based on biological sex rather than gender identity, arguing that creating separate leagues for transgender athletes is impractical and unnecessary. Gaines notes a cultural shift where more people are willing to speak out against the current narrative, indicating a growing acceptance of the idea that men cannot become women. She concludes by discussing the challenges faced by female athletes in the WNBA, particularly regarding the treatment of standout player Caitlyn Clark, and her own upcoming swim across Alcatraz as a tribute to veterans.

Jillian Michaels and Riley Gaines discuss a wave of urgent political and social issues, weaving personal experience with national debates. The episode opens with reflections on Riley Gaines’s life as a new mother and her career in competitive swimming, setting a tone of practical realism as they dive into policy. They scrutinize a prolonged government shutdown, detailing how hundreds of thousands of federal workers go unpaid and how essential services—from national security to food assistance programs—feel the pinch. Riley critiques the leadership dynamics on both sides of the aisle, arguing that accountability and common sense have been eclipsed by partisan theater, while Jillian notes the public’s fatigue with constant political standoffs. The conversation then pivots to the contentious arena of transgender athletes competing in women’s sports, where Gaines argues that fairness is the core principle of sports and that biological differences warrant category distinctions. They discuss legal battles in sports associations and the broader implications for female athletes’ safety and opportunities, framing the issue as one of objective fairness rather than a political stance. The discussion expands to immigration policy and the role of law and order, including the Ninth Circuit’s decisions about deploying the National Guard and the impact on sanctuary cities. Riley shares firsthand encounters with protests and safety concerns on university campuses, while both hosts reflect on how immigration policy intersects with families’ lived experiences, legal pathways, and national identity. The episode also explores media literacy amid a climate of misinformation, highlighting the ease with which videos and claims can be amplified online. They critique the spread of misleading narratives and emphasize the need for careful fact-checking and cross-referencing sources before drawing conclusions. In closing, Gaines emphasizes that Americans are not anti-immigrant, but rather focused on lawful, compassionate, and practical policy. The hosts commend the importance of civil dialogue, urging listeners to engage with multiple perspectives, verify information, and seek constructive solutions that protect safety, fairness, and liberty for all.