reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Geoengineers discuss implementing weather control through aerosols to manipulate wind speeds and cloud formation. HAARP and chemtrails are used as weather weapons to influence precipitation and storm patterns. The introduction of aerosols in the atmosphere leads to droughts and floods, impacting agriculture and water rights. The California drought results in water restrictions, land acquisition, and prioritization of corporate agriculture over small farmers, leading to public suffering. Water scarcity becomes a critical issue with implications for the future.

Scientists and researchers are experimenting with using lasers to manipulate the weather. By firing trillion-watt lasers into the sky, they can create ions that act as seeds for rain and lightning. This experimental technique has shown promise in the laboratory. In the past, governments have allegedly used similar methods to control the weather, but without conclusive results. The use of lasers could have implications for drought areas, agriculture, outdoor events, and even hurricanes. However, it only works with existing water vapor in the air and cannot create rain from a clear blue sky.

Physicists are experimenting with lasers to manipulate weather, potentially causing rain and lightning. By firing trillion-watt lasers into the sky, they aim to rip apart electrons, creating ions that act as condensation seeds. While still experimental, the process has worked in the laboratory, precipitating rain from water vapor. Allegedly, governments have experimented with weather control for decades, including the CIA during the Vietnam War. The use of lasers represents a more physics-based approach to weather modification. The implications could be significant for drought areas needing rain, outdoor events, agriculture, flooding, and even hurricane control.

Military aircraft are dropping chaff, small bits of aluminum or plastic, into the sky. Scientists are researching how to change the weather using lasers. The CIA allegedly used this method during the Vietnam War. The conspiracy theory of chemtrails, where chemicals are released by the government to control minds, is debunked. HAARP, a research center analyzing the ionosphere, has inspired controversy and conspiracy theories. Geoengineering, the deliberate manipulation of environmental processes to mitigate global warming, is being explored. Cloud seeding has been attempted in the past, but its effectiveness and potential side effects are uncertain. The Department of Defense has discussed weather modification, but there is no concrete evidence of weather control by elites.

The speaker states that HARP's work on ionosphere management is complete and they are moving on to other methods of ionosphere control. When asked about a statement made to the Associated Press regarding weather tampering, the speaker confirms their belief that the American government has created weather control techniques so that the "new world order" will be able to starve millions of Americans and control the rest. They claim to possess documents, including patents and a statement from Senator Claiborne Pell, to prove this, asserting weather control was utilized as far back as the Vietnam War. They cite 85 simultaneous tornadoes as evidence and quote Senator Pell as saying weather wars are the greatest weapon ever created.

The speaker asserts that Tehran was nearly rendered uninhabitable by drought, which was, in part, engineered by US radar systems blasting energy to ionize the atmosphere and steer clouds away from Iran. He claims rains have returned after large radar installations around the Persian Gulf were destroyed by Iranian drones, leading to record rainfall in Tehran after a period when evacuations were considered for a city of nine to ten million people. He acknowledges additional damage to Iran’s infrastructure from kinetic warfare by the United States, describing geoengineering as another layer of warfare. He broadens the claim to describe a globalist “deep state” that wages war on multiple levels, listing engineered famine, engineered energy scarcity, pesticides and herbicides to cause cancer and depopulation, weaponized ticks causing Lyme disease, vaccines, and the weaponization of information. He asserts weather control in the United States is intentional, with storms, hurricanes, floods, and droughts used to compromise domestic food supplies. He argues that global elites require scarcity to maintain control, and that efforts are aimed at destroying sources of abundance, including rainfall and sunlight, noting Oregon’s ban on rainwater collection on private property and recounting a court case against a rancher who collected rainwater. The talk links neonicotinoids, organophosphates, and glyphosate to the decline of pollinators and colony collapse, tying these to a broader depopulation agenda. He contends that vaccines and other policies disarm populations and facilitate control, culminating in a claim that Western European governments are waging war on their own people by shutting down energy infrastructure, immunizing illegals, and undermining national heritage. He accuses the French, German, and British governments of national treason and portrays European policies as intent on destroying their nations. A central concept is the “pinch,” a global depopulation effort aimed at eliminating billions by forcing humanity through difficult years with damaged energy infrastructure, scarce food, eroded rule of law, cratering money supplies, and hyperinflation, while social cohesion collapses and trust erodes. He suggests that while many will be killed, survival is possible for those who prepare, emphasizing survival skills, stored food, and self-sufficiency through decentralization. To support this preparation, he promotes resources and strategies for decentralizing life, such as stockpiling essentials and moving toward off-grid capabilities, including domestic energy options, and maintaining financial assets in gold and silver. He encourages viewers to use available resources for survival planning and to share information within their networks. He concludes with a personal note about surviving the “pinch” and signs off as Health Ranger.

The speaker asserts that the Maui wildfires were not natural but a result of weather manipulation, specifically climate engineering. They claim that atmospheric pressure zones were manipulated using technologies like HARP, creating anomalous high and low pressure zones that resulted in massive surface wind flows, which acted as a "bellows effect." Additionally, a "flash drought" was declared a week before the fires, and incendiary dust containing aluminum nanoparticles, which is used in military demolitions, covered the area. The speaker claims this dust acted as a fire starter. They state that these conditions, combined with the wind, created extraordinarily hot temperatures, directly attributable to climate intervention operations, or weather warfare. They dismiss the idea that directed energy weapons, like lasers, were the primary cause, suggesting it's a distraction from the larger issue of weather manipulation. They cite historical examples like Project Popeye in Vietnam and military documents like "Owning the Weather in 2025" to support the claim that weather control is a known capability and objective. The speaker believes the motivation behind these actions is a power addiction and a disregard for the consequences, with climate engineering being used as a weapon to control populations.

In an interview, Speaker 1 claims that the American government has developed weather control techniques to manipulate the climate. They believe that these techniques are part of a plan by the New World Order to starve millions of Americans and control the rest. Speaker 1 mentions having evidence, including patents and statements from Senator Clayborne, who confirms the existence and use of these techniques since the Vietnam War. They assert that the occurrence of 85 tornadoes in a single area is not a coincidence but a result of this weather manipulation. Speaker 1 considers these techniques to be the most powerful weapon ever created, as stated by Senator Klabornfeld.

The conversation centers on the claim that Iran has faced long-running weather manipulation and climate intervention, pushing the idea that weather warfare is being waged against Iran for decades and that this has contributed to severe droughts, disrupted rainfall, and harsh living conditions amid sanctions. Dane Wiggington, founder of geoengineeringwatch.org, leads the discussion with Clayton and Natalie, presenting a narrative that goes beyond mainstream geopolitics to point to covert weather manipulation as a central factor. Key points and assertions include: - Weather warfare against Iran has “gone back forty years plus,” with Iranian meteorologists and former president Ahmadinejad publicly asserting that NATO was cutting off precipitation, thereby destabilizing weather patterns and food production. The guests describe this as ongoing warfare that destabilizes populations. - The practice is described as not just about Iran; the tactic, historically used by the US in conflicts such as Vietnam (Project Popeye), has led to international attempts to regulate weather modification (INMOD treaties) in 1976, though the speakers argue that nations still engage in such activities over their own citizens. - The mechanism of climate engineering is presented as two main methods: diminishing and dispersing precipitation, and completely cutting it off. The discussion highlights ionosphere heater technologies (notably HARP) as tools to heat portions of the atmosphere, creating high-pressure heat domes that steer moisture patterns and produce chemically nucleated rainfall or drought. This is linked to current US West Coast heat waves and is described as a deliberate manipulation of moisture cycles. - The oil-cloud phenomenon in Iran is described as a result of such warfare, with reports of oil covering streets, doors, cars, and lungs from inhalation of aerosolized oil. The guest connects this to broader environmental impacts, including toxic precipitation and altered air quality, and claims similar operations have caused dramatic weather and pollution events elsewhere. - The discussion cites historical and contemporary examples to illustrate broader patterns: Kuwait’s oil wells torched by US forces allegedly to justify infrastructure moves; allegations that US military operations use climate intervention as a weapon; and a claim that blizzards and chemical cooling downs (including alleged chemical ice nucleation) have been weaponized in various regions, including the Gulf Coast and the US Northeast. - The conversation ties climate engineering to geopolitical strategies, arguing that portraying Iran as a nuclear threat serves to justify aggressive actions and to obscure the manipulation of weather and climate systems. Netanyahu’s warnings and statements about water and control of resources are presented as part of this broader manipulation. - The speakers argue that the US and allied governments are maintaining control through deception, suggesting that media coverage is insufficient or complicit. They claim that mainstream outlets like Forbes “cover” for the narrative of cloud theft and downplay the severity of drought and weather manipulation in Iran, while asserting that Western North American snowpack is at record lows, much of it chemically nucleated, reducing runoff. - They emphasize the scale of water stress domestically, warning that tens of millions in the US Southwest could face severe water shortages, with reservoirs like Lake Powell and Lake Mead described as near dead pools with substantial sedimentation reducing usable capacity. - The dialogue connects climate engineering to broader biosphere collapse and asserts that the greatest single source of pollution is the US military. They argue that climate engineering is the crown jewel weapon used to inflict misery while remaining hidden, urging listeners to awaken, form supportive networks, and push for action at the legislative level. - They reference the documentary The Dimming as a resource for evidence of climate engineering and invite audiences to explore geoengineeringwatch.org for ongoing information. Throughout, Dane Wiggington reiterates that climate engineering and weather manipulation are central, ongoing operations that intersect with geopolitics, media coverage, and public health. The conversation maintains a consistent stance that these interventions are real, pervasive, and inadequately addressed by mainstream discourse, urging viewers to seek out more information and grassroots advocacy.

Physicists are using trillion-watt lasers to manipulate weather by creating rain clouds and lightning. Previous alleged experiments by governments have been inconclusive, but current research focuses on the laws of physics. The lasers generate ions that act as seeds for rain and lightning when fired into the sky.

We’ve identified a key factor in the fires: climate change. But what does that really mean? Since 1964, California has engaged in weather modification, which raises questions about its impact. Reports indicate that efforts to augment rainfall have gone wrong, leading to significant flooding. When these programs ceased, rainfall diminished, contributing to fire risks. This situation suggests that the issue may not solely be climate change but rather ongoing weather manipulation. The trails seen in the sky could be linked to these operations, reminiscent of tactics used in Vietnam. Historical context shows that these practices date back to the 1950s, prompting further investigation into their implications.

Weather modification, or cloud seeding, has been ongoing since the 1940s. Government documents and reports from NASA, the National Science Foundation, and the CIA confirm this, detailing substantial funding and research into techniques like seeding clouds with silver iodide or dry ice. Recent state legislation banning cloud seeding and stratospheric aerosol injections further validates its continued practice. While presented as beneficial, this involves spraying harmful chemicals, like sulfur dioxide, into the atmosphere. This raises concerns, especially considering the potential health effects and environmental damage caused by sulfur dioxide, a colorless toxic gas that contributes to acid rain. The practice is linked to efforts to combat global warming, raising questions about motivations and long-term consequences.

Clayton and Natalie opened by noting about 1,000,000 Americans were still without power after a brutal winter storm, then asked whether government or NGOs were involved in a cloud-seeding geoengineering operation prior to the weekend’s storm. They referenced eyewitness reports across the country showing increasing lines in the sky that day and the progression of the storm, asking what the operation was and what the fallout and death toll might be. Dane Wiggington of geoengineeringwatch.org joined and answered, “Yes, absolutely. 100% top to bottom” that the storm was engineered. He urged viewers to consider his prior discussion with Clayton and Natalie, then shifted to Iran as an example of weather warfare. He claimed Iran has been a victim of climate engineering for at least four decades, with NATO operations and Israel cutting off precipitation to Iran, leaving Tehran with a potential evacuation of 10,000,000 people due to drought. He referenced Ahmadinejad on the UN floor alleging NATO and Israel cut off Iran’s precipitation and tied this to the history of weather control and war. The conversation then connected to Lyndon Johnson’s 1962 assertion that the world’s cloud layer could be controlled, and Wiggington stated that “he who controls the weather controls the world.” He asserted that controlling precipitation allows destabilizing food supplies and populations, and that the Iranian climate science community has claimed NATO has been cutting off precipitation for decades. When asked about mechanics, Wiggington explained that climate intervention or weather warfare can be more effective at eliminating precipitation than augmenting it. He described the use of high pressure domes created by ionosphere heater facilities like HARP, which can transmit millions of watts to the ionosphere to heat air and form a high-pressure dome that blocks moisture. He claimed the Northern Hemisphere’s moisture is spun clockwise around this dome, then chemically nucleated and redirected, resulting in thunder-snow and ice storms in the U.S. He described a second method: overseeding with condensation nuclei that are too small to allow raindrop formation, producing featureless skies and no rainfall. He labeled these as patented processes and claimed they’ve been used against Iran for decades and are now being used against the United States. Natalie and Clayton pressed for connection to current events, noting widespread online reports of chemicals in the sky and aircraft activity. Wiggington alleged collaboration between NGOs, the U.S. government, and private defense contractors, including Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, for weather modeling, and claimed illegal gag orders suppress meteorologists. He argued the administration has doubled down on denial and cover-up and warned that each drop of rain is toxic, with peer-reviewed studies cited. He described chemically nucleated material as colder to the touch and suggested it reduces river runoff, citing record-low Colorado snowpack. The discussion touched on media portrayal and political figures, with Wiggington criticizing RFK Jr. and Lee Zeldin for denial or cover-up, and noting Trump’s “where’s your global warming now?” comment in relation to the storm. He warned of the potential for biological carriers like polymer fibers and graphene in rain samples and suggested the possibility of a future biological agent if control is lost. The segment closed with a call to wake up to climate engineering as a major factor tearing apart the climate system and to demand accountability from leaders.

Scientists and researchers are experimenting with using lasers to manipulate the weather. By firing trillion-watt lasers into the sky, they can create ions that act as seeds for rain clouds and even lightning. This experimental technique has shown promise in the laboratory. In the past, governments have allegedly used similar methods to control the weather, but without conclusive results. However, with the use of these powerful lasers, scientists are now delving into the laws of physics to bring about weather changes. While this technique may not be effective on clear blue skies, it holds potential for aiding drought areas, agriculture, flood control, and even hurricane management.

Scientists are exploring the use of lasers to manipulate weather, potentially controlling rain and lightning. Physicists are firing trillion-watt lasers into the sky to precipitate rain clouds and bring down lightning bolts. The process involves using lasers to create ions, which act as seeds for water vapor to condense around, similar to dust particles. While still experimental, the technology has shown promise in the laboratory. There are allegations that governments, including the CIA and USSR, have experimented with weather control in the past, though nothing conclusive. The current laser technology requires existing water vapor in the air to work, making it ineffective in clear, blue sky conditions. However, it could be used for flood control, agriculture, outdoor events, and even hurricane modification.

The transcript presents a wide-ranging discussion about geoengineering, its methods, alleged environmental and health impacts, and the social, political, and economic consequences of manipulating the climate. - Definitions and methods - Geoengineering is defined as the artificial modification of the Earth's climate. Geoengineers are proposing spraying 10 to 20,000,000 tons of toxic aluminum and other substances into the sky to cool the planet. - Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is described as making the Earth whiter by reflecting sunlight with particles to reduce heat absorption; aluminum and sulfur are discussed as possible reflective agents. It is claimed that model results indicate reflection of sunlight can offset most climate change in most places most of the time, but will damage some places. - Aerosols, including oxides of metals (notably aluminum oxide) and other substances like barium and strontium, are said to function as cloud condensation nuclei, affect precipitation patterns, and interact with atmospheric moisture to influence weather. - Techniques such as cloud seeding and ionospheric heating (including HARP) are described as ways to modify weather by concentrating RF energy, dispersing particulates, or heating the ionosphere to alter jet streams and pressure systems. - Alleged evidence and observations - Observations of chemtrails and a “chemtrail geoengineering footprint” of aluminum, barium, and strontium are presented as widespread, with rain and snow samples allegedly showing these elements and linking them to patents and weather changes. - Reports of environmental changes in forests and soils are cited, including pH shifts toward alkalinity, tree and plant die-offs, and increased fungal infections in crops and ecosystems. - Claims that the sky is rarely blue, global dimming, reduced sunshine, and altered precipitation patterns are linked to aerosol operations and patent-driven goals. - Examples include droughts and floods in various regions, altered storm tracks, and unusual weather events such as anomalous snowfall and temperature swings. - Health, ecology, and agriculture - Alleged health impacts associated with inhaled metals (aluminum, barium, strontium) include rises in asthma, ADHD, autism, and other conditions; cited are concerns from rain- and soil-based studies and observations of changing ecosystems. - Organisms and crops are described as suffering under altered soils (pH changes), increased abiotic stress, and fungal pressures; references are made to Monsanto and GM crops as responses to these stresses, including drought- and flood-tolerance patents. - Organic farmers report declines in crop yields and quality, changes in the viability of basil, cilantro, and tomatoes, and a shift toward greenhouse cultivation to sustain production. - Economic and geopolitical dimensions - Weather is framed as a major driver of commodity markets; weather derivatives are described as financial tools used to hedge or profit from weather-related risk, with potential for immense profits if weather is manipulated. - There is a suggested link between geoengineering research funding (government grants and private funding, including Gates), corporate interests (Monsanto), and the commoditization of weather and food production. Claims include that droughts or floods could boost seed sales and corporate control over agriculture. - The narrative asserts a transfer of wealth and power to a few: corporations and financiers could profit from climate manipulation, while ordinary farmers and populations face food insecurity and market volatility. - Historical context is offered, including references to attempts at weather modification for military ends, the Montréal and NMOD treaties aimed at banning weather warfare, and the notion that domestic exemptions in treaties allow some activities within borders. - Military and governance implications - Weather modification is described as a potential force multiplier in warfare, capable of denying enemy access by creating extreme weather or redirecting storm tracks; historical anecdotes about hurricanes and monsoon manipulation are discussed. - The concept of “owning the weather by 2025” is cited as a military objective, with the idea that environmental manipulation could control battle spaces and influence outcomes. - Debates about sovereignty, accountability, and the ethics of weather control are raised, including concerns about lawsuits, international governance, and the rights of the global population to the atmosphere. - Calls to action and ethics - The speakers advocate public awareness, local-to-global organizing, whistleblowing, and dissemination of information to environmental, farm, health, and media groups. - There is a recurring warning that those who control weather could control food, markets, and political stability, and a lament that the atmosphere and biosphere belong to all of humanity, not to a few corporate or political actors. - Concluding tension - The film presents a tension between scientific capability to engineer climate and the untested, potentially dangerous consequences for ecosystems, health, and equitable access to resources. It emphasizes the need for vigilance, transparency, and public engagement to address possible harms and governance gaps.

We've finished our work with HARP, which was designed to inject energy into the ionosphere to control it, and are moving on to other ways of managing the ionosphere. Regarding the statement about weather tampering techniques, that's exactly what I meant. Weather control techniques exist. We have a complete package of information, including patents and Senator Claiborne Pell's statements, which confirm its existence and use as far back as the Vietnam War. The government has created weather tampering techniques so that the new world order will be able to starve millions of Americans and to control the rest. As bizarre as it sounds, we have documents to prove it. The equipment is set up internationally. Senator Claiborne Pell stated that weather wars are the greatest weapon ever created.

Today, we're exploring a hurricane heading toward Florida and its potential connections to past events. In 1947, a hurricane named King followed a similar path, and I discovered that the US government and General Electric conducted a project that went wrong, resulting in flooding and casualties. A document titled "Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025" raises further questions about weather manipulation. Additionally, Operation Popeye involved using weather as a weapon in warfare. General Electric's documents outline various methods for controlling weather phenomena. This situation feels reminiscent of a simulation game. However, there are countermeasures, like Wilhelm Reich's Cloud Buster, which can mitigate these effects. It seems we may have insights into the origins of climate change and natural disasters. You can draw your own conclusions.

Speaker 0 describes the hurricane as the ultimate geopolitical weapon for massive cleansing: it heats the ocean temperature, pulverizes the sky, and sends waves into the atmosphere. All of this is claimed to be patented and official, with tests also conducted in laboratories. The claim is made that the climate is not natural, but manufactured over decades. The combination of a warm ocean and a humid atmosphere is described as the pump for the cyclone, the perfect machine to erase, rebuild, and control. The narrative urges viewing this as projects rather than catastrophes, warning against getting trapped in climate greenwashing, as noted by Peter Feel. The assertion is made that these zones are needed to disappear and that those responsible have the means to make it happen. A specific example given is Jamaica, where destruction is said to have succeeded; Kingston can now rebuild under the Vision 2030 project. The speaker instructs to place images side by side with Maoï to achieve the same result, implying parallels or replication of outcomes. Fire is described as being used for more precise cleansings, with blue beams and hacked electric meters, all framed as part of a new sustainable concept. In Gaza, the same approach is claimed, but with weapons described as more direct. Extreme conditions are said to create urgency and justify digital reconstruction. The timeline references Valencia, a year ago, for its smart city, and before that Malibu for Los Angeles 2, suggesting a recurring pattern or model being applied across different locations. Overall, the speaker asserts that the entire world is aligning with the model of a technocratic state.

Man's quest to control the weather and use it as a weapon is explored in this video. The HARP project in Gekona, Alaska, uses ELF waves to manipulate the ionosphere and potentially alter the weather worldwide. Chemtrails, sprayed by high-flying US Air Force tankers, are combined with HAARP to heat metal oxides in the atmosphere, preventing cloud formation and rainfall. This technology can also weaponize rain, causing destructive floods. The video highlights the potential dangers and consequences of these weather manipulation techniques.

The speaker states that the American government has created weather tampering techniques so that the new world order will be able to starve millions of Americans and control the rest. He claims to have documents proving this, including patents on the equipment and Senator Claiborne Pell's statements. He asserts that the U.S. utilized weather control as far back as the Vietnam War. He believes it is not an accident that 85 tornadoes occurred simultaneously in the middle of a growing area. He says that weather wars are the greatest weapon ever created, quoting Senator Pell. He stands by his claim.

In the 20th century, countries used chemicals to seed clouds for rain, including China during the Olympics. The U.S. Military aims to control weather by 2025, with over 150 weather modification programs worldwide. Chemtrails, different from contrails, contain toxic chemicals like barium and nanoaluminum, harming human health and the environment. Nanoparticles from chemtrails pose a serious threat, affecting wildlife, plant growth, and human health. The potential dangers of these chemicals and nanoparticles are concerning and require further investigation. Translation: Countries used chemicals to seed clouds for rain in the 20th century. The U.S. Military aims to control weather by 2025, with over 150 weather modification programs worldwide. Chemtrails, different from contrails, contain toxic chemicals like barium and nanoaluminum, harming human health and the environment. Nanoparticles from chemtrails pose a serious threat, affecting wildlife, plant growth, and human health. The potential dangers of these chemicals and nanoparticles are concerning and require further investigation.

The climate bomb is a secret weapon being developed that uses magnetic bombardment to cause devastating effects on a planetary scale. This includes floods, earthquakes, tsunamis, droughts, and cataclysms. It is part of climate-based geoengineering, which involves chemtrails and HAARP. Despite being labeled as conspiracy theories, there is evidence of disinformation and manipulation surrounding these techniques. Both the USA and Russia have the ability to manipulate the weather for military purposes. The US army has perfected this technology using the high frequency active auroral research program (HAARP), which operates in outer space and can destabilize agricultural and ecological systems worldwide. Climate warfare can destroy enemy countries' ecosystems, agriculture, and communication networks, leading to poverty and devastation without deploying troops. HAARP is connected to decades of space-based research and military development.

Scientists and researchers are experimenting with lasers to manipulate the weather. By firing trillion-watt lasers into the sky, they can create ions that act as seeds for rain clouds and lightning. This experimental technique has shown promise in the laboratory. In the past, governments have allegedly used similar methods, but with inconclusive results. The use of lasers could potentially help areas suffering from drought or in need of rain for crops. However, it only works with existing water vapor in the air and cannot create rain from clear blue skies. This weather modification technique could have applications in agriculture, outdoor events, and even hurricanes.