TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

He claims to have a superior plan, but he hasn't shared it yet. Despite Canada experiencing wildfires, he continues to deny the existence of climate change.

The Prime Minister is under fire for his "radical liberalization of hard drugs," specifically the decriminalization of fentanyl, crack, and heroin in partnership with the BCNDP, and lowered jail sentences for fentanyl producers. Eighty percent of fentanyl ingredients enter Canada unregulated and are then manufactured into fentanyl. This threatens the trade relationship with the U.S. The Prime Minister is accused of scoring "cheap political points" instead of delivering solutions based on science, compassion, and public health. The opposition claims it is irresponsible to allow unregulated fentanyl ingredients into the country, decriminalize hard drugs, and then support decriminalization nationwide despite rising deaths. The Prime Minister is asked to confirm he opposes decriminalization.

We had limited time in the house for debate, so online harms bill didn't make it to committee. The minister needs time to establish a regulator for hate speech. We want to move C-63 to the senate, but it was tabled in June. Despite being productive, delays were blamed on the conservatives and us.

The speaker criticizes the leader of the opposition for suggesting that everything was perfect under the previous conservative government and wanting to make Canada great again. Canadians do not share this nostalgia. The speaker highlights the leader's past as part of Stephen Harper's failed housing minister, where he violated the rights of indigenous peoples, ignored environmental responsibilities, and lacked a plan for the future.

According to Speaker 0, Canada's new prime minister threatened to seize capital from companies not advancing Canada's climate agenda. Speaker 1 stated the goal is for every financial decision to consider climate change, backing companies that are part of the solution and taking capital away from those who are part of the problem. Speaker 0 claims the prime minister is a fan of censorship and threatened American social media platforms, referencing a statement by Speaker 1 that large American online platforms have become seas of hate and are being used by criminals to harm children, and that his government will act. Speaker 0 asserts there is no free speech in Canada and that the prime minister wants to ban social media platforms, shut down dissent, and use the climate crisis as an excuse to steal from businesses and control their means of production. Speaker 0 concludes that while the friendship between the US and Canada will continue, the "free ride" is over.

Justin Trudeau is criticized by members of the European Parliament for undermining democracy in Canada while condemning Vladimir Putin. German MP Christine Anderson suggests Trudeau should not speak in the house due to human rights violations. Another representative from Croatia labels Canada under Trudeau as a symbol of civil rights violations and dictatorship.

The speaker criticizes the leader of the opposition, stating that he believes everything was perfect under the previous conservative government and wants to make Canada great again. However, the speaker argues that Canadians do not share this sentiment. They highlight the leader's past actions as part of Stephen Harper's failed housing minister, including violating the rights of indigenous peoples and neglecting environmental responsibilities. The speaker also mentions the lack of a future environmental and economic plan.

The Conservative Party of Canada is using Ukraine as a political tool to appeal to their MAGA base. Pierre Poliyev recently referred to Ukraine as a distant foreign land, disregarding the contributions of Ukrainian Canadians who have helped build this country for over a century. While the conservative party may abandon Ukraine, we will continue to support them for as long as necessary.

Mr. Poliyev's actions are deemed irresponsible and reckless, as they will negatively impact Canadians. He has submitted thousands of amendments, including trivial changes, to bills such as the Sustainable Jobs Act. This behavior reflects his lack of seriousness and his attempt to hold parliament hostage. Canadians should recognize him as a bully, as his actions are not indicative of responsible leadership. It is evident that he views politics as a game for personal gain, and he should not be allowed to bully Canadians.

Speaker 1 asserts that Trudeau destroyed Canada economically, socially, and culturally, particularly through authoritarian COVID-19 measures and vaccine passports. Speaker 1 regrets not being vaccinated, calling it the best decision of their life. Speaker 0 suggests Trudeau systematically destroyed Canada, possibly on purpose, through actions like the MAIDS program. Speaker 1 claims Trudeau is a socialist and globalist who doubled Canada's debt in ten years, reaching $1.2 trillion. Mass immigration, combined with multiculturalism, has led to societal fragmentation and a decline in GDP per capita. Speaker 0 questions why Trudeau isn't in jail for these actions. Speaker 1 advocates for an inquiry into COVID-19 policies and a moratorium on immigration and mRNA vaccines. They criticize current political leaders for pandering to ethnic communities and supporting policies detrimental to Canadians. Speaker 1 states that Canada's democratic system does not produce democratic results. They claim globalists are destroying western countries like Canada by pushing mass immigration. Speaker 1 criticizes both Trudeau's Liberal party and the Conservative party leader, Pierre Polyyev, for similar policies on tariffs, immigration, and climate change. They accuse them of prioritizing foreign interests over Canadian citizens. Speaker 1 expresses concern over Chinese interference in Canadian elections and the presence of disloyal members of parliament. They advocate for a moratorium on immigration, citing strains on infrastructure and the economy. Speaker 1 says Canada has no gold reserves.

The speaker criticizes the conservative party for not supporting Ukraine in terms of military, financial, and humanitarian aid. They also mention that the party voted against the Canada Ukraine free trade agreement, blaming it on carbon pricing, which is irrelevant since Ukraine has had it since 2011. They ask the minister of international trade to explain the importance of the agreement. The speaker is interrupted and asked to focus on the government's business. The transcript ends with a mention of the next question from a member in South Coast, New York.

I will not entertain Mr. Poliyev's temper tantrums. We were supposed to debate Bill C50, which focuses on sustainable jobs and Canada's future. Canada ranks 3rd in the world for foreign direct investment because we understand the importance of fighting climate change. However, Mr. Poliyev and his conservative members added 198 amendments to an 11-page bill, causing more voting chaos. He wants to bring American-style extreme right-wing politics to Canada. Instead, I suggest they take a break, reflect on their obstructionist politics, and talk to real Canadians. Their actions have been irresponsible.

According to Speaker 0, Mr. Polyev stated he would not reflexively oppose the government, but support it when in the country's best interest, because he wants the country to succeed. However, he then spent fifteen minutes attacking ministers like Sean Fraser and Stephen Guildeaux for ruining the country. Speaker 1 noted Mr. Polyev's approach suggests he won the election, not lost it. He will only be able to stand in defense of Canadians because of the Prime Minister's goodwill in calling an early by-election for him in Alberta, costing close to $2,000,000. Speaker 1 found it interesting that Mr. Polyev is going after Stephen Gabbeau, blaming Sean Frazier for the housing crisis, and wanting to fight the same political battles from the last campaign.

The speaker claims the prime minister is a climate zealot and eco extremist. They assert the prime minister has pushed for net-zero banking for decades, intending to prevent banks from investing in oil and gas. The speaker alleges the prime minister plans to increase carbon taxes on the oil and gas industry to eviscerate it, referencing the prime minister's book as evidence. According to the speaker, Canada's national identity, unity, freedom, and future are at a monumental crossroads.

Speaker 0 states this is the most important election in most of their lifetimes. They claim Trump has made unacceptable threats against the economy, workers, and sovereignty. They believe a particular leader can address these issues and needs support. Speaker 1 accuses Catherine McKenna of losing track of 20,000 contracts worth $236,000,000,000, which they claim is why she is no longer in parliament. Speaker 1 repeats the accusation and insults Speaker 0. Speaker 1 continues to harass Catherine, repeating the $236,000,000,000 figure and using abusive language. Speaker 1 then states that everyone is "fucking retarded."

I'm being called a fascist for wanting to stop the war in Ukraine today. I'm against the needless deaths of hundreds of thousands of people and I'm looking for peace, not war. I didn't come here to be aggressive, but a member of parliament started screaming at me for asking a question, which is all on video. I'm just showing what's happening and exposing Charlie Angus for who he is: a member of parliament who screams and swears at Canadian citizens. He slanders people and wants to revoke citizenship of those he disagrees with, yet he calls me a fascist. This group surrounded and shouted me down for simply asking a question. Who are the real fascists here? I have it all on video.

The speaker criticizes the opposition for spreading falsehoods about foreign lands. They mention the current struggles faced by Ukrainians in defending their democracy. Quoting from Trump's "America First" policy, they question if conservatives voted against the Canada-Ukraine free trade agreement because they are influenced by Trump's stance on not using military might to rebuild other countries. The speaker implies that conservatives may not support the rebuilding of Ukraine and its democracy.

I am running in the next election to fight for the middle class, reconciliation, climate change, and to build an inclusive economy. Pierre Polioff, on the other hand, wants to bring far-right populist politics to Canada. He insults people's homes, uses homeless individuals for political gain, bullies LGBTQ+ youth, and cuts important programs like dental care and childcare. Polioff lacks the ability to answer tough questions and his so-called "common sense" approach is nonsense.

A company that never had federal government contracts suddenly received a billion dollars for IT, even though it doesn't do IT and has only 4 employees in a basement cottage headquarters. The speaker questions why this suspicious company started getting contracts exactly 21 days after the prime minister took office. The prime minister's response is that the relevant authorities need to investigate the situation. Meanwhile, the focus on the government's side is on making life more affordable for Canadians, such as attracting healthcare workers, forgiving student loans for rural doctors and nurses, and accelerating housing construction. The conservative party is blocking these initiatives, but the government will continue to support Canadians.

I am here to ask Justin Trudeau basic questions about the carbon tax. Seven premiers oppose the tax hike, including Danielle Smith. The police are behaving strangely, following me and not allowing me to approach the prime minister. We just want answers to questions that Canadians care about. This behavior is outrageous and unnecessary.

Canada's agreement with Ukraine shows solidarity and support for their freedom and sovereignty. However, every conservative member of Parliament voted against it, which is shocking. It raises concerns about the conservative party's commitment to Ukraine and their lack of support for those fighting for freedom. Ukrainian Canadians should question the party's motives. Mr. Poliyev, who claims to stand for freedom, has not shown support for Ukraine or people around the world.

Speaker 1 asserts that Trudeau destroyed Canada economically, socially, and culturally, particularly through authoritarian COVID-19 measures and vaccine passports. Speaker 1 regrets not being vaccinated, while Speaker 0 agrees. Speaker 0 claims Trudeau systematically destroyed Canada, possibly on purpose, citing the MAIDS program. Speaker 1 accuses Trudeau of being a socialist, globalist, and follower of the World Economic Forum, doubling Canada's debt in ten years. Speaker 1 blames mass immigration, promoted by Trudeau's multiculturalism policies, for declining GDP per capita and societal fragmentation. Speaker 0 questions why Trudeau isn't in jail for his actions. Speaker 1 calls for an inquiry into COVID-19 policies and a moratorium on immigration and mRNA vaccines. Speaker 1 criticizes current political leaders for pandering to ethnic communities and supporting mass immigration, echoing the "replacement doc theory." Speaker 1 claims the democratic system isn't producing democratic results and that the mainstream media cancels opposing viewpoints. Speaker 1 says globalists are anti-western, targeting majority white Christian countries. Speaker 1 accuses Carney and Polyyev of prioritizing foreigners over Canadians, and says they love power. Speaker 1 says Canada has Chinese interference in elections, with some MPs not loyal to the country. Speaker 1 says immigrants bring internal conflicts to Canada. Speaker 1 says Polyyev and Carney want to impose a carbon tax. Speaker 1 says Canada has no gold reserves.

We will govern responsibly and work with politicians from all sides of the house. Where there is constructive criticism of our agenda with responsible alternative policies, we will listen. That means we are also looking to the opposition to conduct its itself responsibly. I am under no illusions about what we face with the conservatives under the leadership of Pierre Pauliev. In the last parliament, mister Pauliev's approach was far from responsible. In fact, he shut down parliament for weeks on end last fall, as I'm sure you all remember. He thought and hopefully no longer thinks a bad day for the government was a good day for the opposition, but this is not how this country runs. We need more good days for parliament. And increasingly, Canadians are of the view that a good day for parliament is when parties work together.

Pierre Pauliev announces an emergency in parliament as the Liberals shut down debate on their censorship bill. He says they are censoring debate on the online screening act and that closure is being used to ram the bill through in record time. He asserts that Liberal efforts would give Trudeau’s woke bureaucrats at the CRTC power to control what Canadians see and say online, describing it as creeping totalitarianism referenced by artist Margaret Atwood. Pauliev claims conservatives are the only party fighting back against this censorship bill and that Canadians should have the freedom to decide what they see and say online. He urges listeners to immediately sign his freedom of speech petition, providing a link, and states the goal of giving people back control of their lives to make Canada “the freest country on earth.”

Conservative leader Pierre Polivier refuses to confirm if Canada will commit to its emission targets under the Paris agreement. When asked if he will denounce the accord, Polivier avoids a direct answer. Instead, he states that his agenda and policy focus on reducing emissions and delivering at a lower cost.