reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker argues against the conventional view on raw eggs and salmonella, claiming that salmonella is a beneficial bacteria and that all bacteria are beneficial to the body. They state that fear around eating raw eggs is a trick to get people to cook them, and they claim to have eaten hundreds and now thousands of raw eggs while remaining healthy. The speaker suggests that warnings about raw eggs are misinformation and asserts that people are misled into believing they are allergic to eggs, when in fact they are allergic to what the animals are fed. For obtaining the best eggs, the speaker recommends Amos Miller as one option, Nourish Farms as another, or finding a local farmer who does not feed chickens corn or soy. They emphasize that feeding chickens corn or soy leads to people feeling allergic to eggs, arguing that the allergy is a result of the feed rather than the eggs themselves. The speaker contends that the public is misled into thinking people are allergic to eggs. Addressing dogs, the speaker notes that raw foods and eggs can help a dog with hip pain, and that dogs (and cats) eat raw, implying that there are no animals meant to eat kibble and cooked foods. They conclude by stating that it makes absolutely no sense when one thinks about it, because animals do not eat like that.

- The speaker presents a checklist for healthy cats and dogs and raises controversial claims about vaccines, diet, and technology used on pets. - Vaccination critique: Vaccines are pushed because “there’s money in the side effects,” and a claim is cited from the book Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean that “Rabies doesn’t even exist, but they poison the animals anyways.” - Diet recommendations: Advocates raw diets for dogs and cats, specifically “Raw meat, raw milk. Not kibble, processed garbage.” Cites Doctor Pottinger (Dr. Pottinger) who fed 900 cats raw meat and raw milk, reporting no parasites, no dewormers, and silky skin and fur. - Personal anecdote: A friend reportedly gave raw meat and “superfoods” to their dog; the dog supposedly showed no teary eyes, no skin allergies, and no deworming. - Parasites and metals claim: The speaker asserts that parasites are caused by heavy metal pollution; kibble is “loaded with metals,” leading animals to develop worms to counter the metals. - Vaccines and implants claim: Vaccines and RFID/chip implants are described as treating animals like lab experiments, allegedly causing tumors in the region where they are placed. - Alternative remedies: Mentions a case where Pearl Powder Shiloh Shot in Dragon’s Blood with a raw diet was given to a puppy, and the puppy was described as happy and healthy with complimenting observations. - Wireless/chemistry claim: Ends with the idea of an “invisible rainbow” (WiFi) that harms animals, suggesting microwave frequencies cook them. List of perceived hazards includes vaccines, kibble, WiFi, RFID chips, and dewormers, all said to contribute to health issues in dogs and cats.

The speaker asserts that preservatives are toxic to the body and rejects putting any preservatives into it, stating that if what you’re consuming is not three ingredients or less (basically food), you should not put it into your body. They argue that common additives like citric acid, maltodextrin, vegetable glycerin, and soy lecithin should be avoided, describing each as problematic. Key claims include: - Citric acid is a toxic mold sprayed with aluminum, and it was created by Pfizer, so people are aware and should avoid it in supplements, food, cleaning products, and shampoos. - Maltodextrin is derived from corn that has been sprayed with pesticides and is a cheap filler. - Vegetable glycerin could come from canola, soy, or corn, and you have no idea; solvents and chemicals are used in its production. - Soy lecithin is another cheap filler used in vitamins, supplements, and foods and it causes bloating. - Xanthex gum (Xantham gum) is another additive mentioned. The speaker emphasizes keeping intake simple: if you’re eating, stick to the simplest things—meat, dairy, honey, fruit, vegetables, nuts, and superfoods. They claim all of these are single-ingredient foods. If you want to add flavor, you can use some spices, but there isn’t much needed beyond that. They criticize highly processed products, suggesting that items like cookies with many ingredients are “garbage” that will pollute the body. The speaker contends that dietary issues people encounter are often attributed to genetics, but in their view, the root cause is having “poisoned” the body with processed foods. The conclusion presented is that avoiding processed additives and focusing on simple, whole foods will lead to better gut health, whereas consuming processed, multi-ingredient products will lead to negative outcomes. The speaker closes with a blunt affirmation: “It’s great.”

The speaker explains why they don't pasteurize their milk, stating that raw milk from grass-fed cows, produced in a clean environment, has a different pH and quality. This milk is biologically active, containing enzymes that aid digestion, offering more nutritional benefits. In contrast, milk from confined dairy cows fed grain has higher bacteria levels due to pH changes. Pasteurization, while killing harmful bacteria in this milk, also destroys beneficial enzymes, rendering the milk inert and harder to digest. The speaker claims that raw milk from grass-fed cows contains beneficial cultured bacteria, similar to yogurt, making it good for you. Furthermore, this raw milk has a longer shelf life than pasteurized milk because it doesn't sour in the same way.

Speaker 0 discusses the idea that the immune system is adaptive to threats and connects this to the consumption of raw milk. He references studies conducted in Europe, stating that children who drink raw milk do not get the flu and do not get the common cold, saying that “those are viruses.” He notes that these effects were observed over ten years of study, implying a long-term pattern rather than a short-term anomaly. The speaker contrasts raw milk with vaccines, suggesting that the former changes from year to year not through vaccination but because the cows adapt to that year’s environment and that year’s viruses, thereby creating antibodies for the new strain every year. He asserts that “raw milk changes every year” due to this environmental and viral adaptation in cows, and that mother nature’s blueprint supports this process. Based on this, he argues for valuing farming practices over pharmaceutical interventions, stating that the United States has a compromised gut microbiome and immune system, which makes people susceptible to fear. He emphasizes not giving in to fear, describing fear as a manipulative tool that arises from concerns about the gut microbiome and immune health. The speaker laments the situation as “sad,” urging a shift toward natural, farm-based approaches as preferable to pharmaceutical reliance, and advocating a perspective aligned with “be farmers over pharmacies.” The overarching message is that raw milk, by virtue of yearly adaptive changes in cows and their environment, may confer immune benefits that differ from those provided by vaccines, and that cultural and public health narratives should not be driven by fear but by an appreciation of natural processes and farming practices.

The video discusses the numerous benefits of raw milk, particularly in the form of kefir, for the human gut. It highlights how raw milk can repair damage caused by antibiotics and other harmful substances, and how it supports the gut microbiome and immune system. The safety and cleanliness of raw milk are emphasized, along with the importance of state standards and the need for the FDA to acknowledge its safety. The video also touches on the innovation and intentionality behind farm practices, including the production of truly raw cheese. Personal testimonies highlight the positive impact of raw milk on health, and the importance of prioritizing prevention and whole food nutrition.

Most people are unaware that the milk sold in supermarkets is pasteurized, which kills the enzymes that cause spoilage. This allows the milk to last for months. Pasteurization is done for financial reasons. Smart individuals believe that raw foods are superior, but the government opposes this because raw foods don't make you sick like processed foods do. Processed foods are preserved because they are already dead.

The speaker argues that mercury poisoning from tuna is misunderstood. They claim a can of tuna is cooked twice before being placed in the can, and therefore people are not getting mercury poisoning from eating raw tuna but from the tuna being cooked twice and then packaged with polymers and chemicals. The speaker asserts that mercury poisoning results from this process rather than from raw consumption. According to the speaker, nobody gets mercury poisoning from eating raw wild-caught tuna, wild-caught salmon, or wild-caught fish. Instead, they claim poisoning comes from tuna that has been cooked, or from farm-raised tuna that is fed soy pellets, canola, corn, and other garbage. The speaker urges that people rethink what they’re being told about mercury in fish. The speaker references John, who reportedly discussed mercury as the substance that makes fish jump out of the water, and connects that idea to swordfish, which is described as loaded with mercury and “gets up into the air.” The claim is made that mercury in this context contributes to the fish’s ability to leave the water. The speaker contends that there are “benefits of mercury in your body,” but emphasizes that mercury is not meant to be injected with boosters, and is not meant to be cooked up and then released and eaten. They suggest that consuming wild-caught raw tuna yields “tons of energy,” and compare this to eating oysters, which they describe as aphrodisiacs and beneficial. The speaker states that oysters are real good for you, and implies that similar benefits apply to tuna and all fish when eaten raw. The overarching message is that raw fish, particularly wild-caught varieties, are presented as superior or energetically advantageous by the speaker, who also argues that the preparation process (cooking then canning) and the feed practices of farm-raised fish alter the mercury dynamics. The speaker concludes with the assertion that raw consumption is preferred, claiming that “raw is the law” for fish in general.

The speakers discuss the difficulty of finding raw milk and the legal restrictions surrounding it. They mention that some people have been arrested for having whole milk, which they find preposterous considering the ease of buying whiskey. The reasons for pasteurization and homogenization are discussed, including health concerns and shelf life. The speakers mention a small raw food club that was raided for sharing raw milk. They question the priorities of federal agents and highlight the benefits of raw milk, such as better taste and easier digestion. The conversation also touches on the French tradition of unpasteurized cheese and the overall health of the French population.

The transcript centers on a claim-filled comparison between organic and conventional produce, framed as a discussion about nutrient content and the broader value of organic farming. The speaker opens by referencing a public perception—that organic is overpriced and ineffective—citing a perceived lack of recent research: “This was the last study done on organic in 1995. This is why there are no more studies on this.” The speaker then uses a single food example, tomatoes, to illustrate dramatic differences in mineral content between organic and conventional farming. According to the speaker, tomatoes grown organically show substantially higher mineral levels across a range of nutrients. The stated figures are as follows: - Calcium: six times higher in organic. - Magnesium: almost 10 to 12 times higher in organic. - Potassium: three to four times higher in organic. - Sodium: six times higher in organic. - Manganese: 68 times more in organic. - Iron: 1,900 (implying a dramatic increase in organic versus conventional). Additionally, the speaker asserts a striking contrast for copper: “Zero copper in the conventional because they sprayed it with pesticides and ruined it. Meanwhile, you have 53 times.” This statement implies that organic tomatoes contain copper at a level that is 53 times that of conventional tomatoes, with the conventional crop allegedly having zero copper due to pesticide use. The overall argument presented is that organic tomatoes have markedly higher mineral content compared to conventional ones, and that conventional farming’s use of pesticides has negative consequences—specifically, eliminating copper content. The speaker uses these numerical claims to suggest a broader nutritional deficiency in populations eating conventionally produced produce, tying the data to a broader critique of conventional farming practices and referencing the supposed lack of ongoing research since 1995 as part of the narrative. Key items highlighted include the large multipliers for calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and manganese, plus the extraordinary claim regarding iron (1,900) and copper (zero in conventional, 53 times higher in organic). The framing emphasizes “mineral content” as a core differentiator and uses tomatoes as the concrete example to illustrate how organic farming could impact nutrient availability. The segment combines a debunking of perceived inertia in organic research with a bold presentation of comparative mineral data to argue for the superiority of organic farming in delivering richer mineral profiles in produce.

In this video, Mark McAfee, owner of the largest raw dairy farm in the world, discusses the benefits of raw milk, particularly in the form of kefir, for gut health. Raw milk contains antibodies and immune system support found in colostrum, nourishing and protecting the gut. Despite FDA restrictions on claims about its healing properties, numerous studies support its benefits for gut health and immune function. The speakers also highlight the safety and cleanliness of raw milk, emphasizing its differences from commercially processed milk. They discuss the importance of state standards and regulations, as well as the positive impact of raw milk on conventional dairy farmers' livelihoods. The production of raw cheese and its unique qualities are also discussed. The video concludes by emphasizing the need for better education and understanding of raw milk's benefits in human nutrition.

Speaker 0 argues that raw eggs are very beneficial and that there is a push to avoid eating them raw. They criticize labels that say avoid raw eggs and claim people are misinformed by health influencers who tell you to eat only the yolk; they assert there are many beautiful minerals and nutrients in the raw egg and compare it to pearl powder, which they say also benefits the eyes. They state the whole egg should be consumed, not just the yolk. They recommend consuming about two to three raw eggs per day, depending on the day. If someone experiences restlessness or nerves that are “all jacked up,” raw eggs can be very beneficial. They explain that nerves being overactive is due to over-stimulation from technology. The solution offered is to crack open an organic, cage-free, pasture-raised, whole egg and drink it, specifically noting eggs from Arizona.

Raw milk's restricted access contrasts sharply with alcohol's legality and widespread availability, despite alcohol contributing to over 100,000 deaths annually in the U.S. This disparity suggests health and safety are not the primary concerns driving raw milk regulations, implying ulterior motives behind its prohibition.

We don't pasteurize our milk because our cows eat grass and live in a clean environment. This affects their bloodstream's pH and the milk quality, making it biologically active with enzymes that aid digestion, offering more benefits. In contrast, confined dairy cows eat grain, altering their pH and increasing harmful bacteria in their milk. Pasteurization, or boiling, kills everything, but also removes the good elements, making it harder to digest. Raw milk from these cows would be dangerous. Our grass-fed cows have beneficial bacteria, similar to yogurt, which is healthy. Interestingly, our milk has a longer shelf life than pasteurized milk because it doesn't sour like conventional milk when it goes bad.

In the early 1900s, raw milk was praised for its health benefits by doctors like Charles Porter and Dr. Crew. Despite its historical value, raw milk is now illegal in 21 states due to safety concerns raised by the CDC and FDA. While some argue that raw milk has potential health benefits, others emphasize the risks associated with harmful bacteria. The shift in perception towards raw milk raises questions about the changing attitudes towards food safety and consumption over time.

In this video, Mark McAfee of Organic Pastures, a dairy farmer, discusses the importance of raw milk for the immune system and addresses the double standards applied to it compared to other food products. McAfee emphasizes the role of gut bacteria in maintaining a healthy immune system and highlights the negative effects of antibiotics and processed foods on gut health. He shares personal stories of individuals who have experienced health improvements after consuming raw milk. McAfee urges consumers to prioritize whole, natural foods and support local farmers. The speaker also discusses the struggles of the dairy industry and suggests consuming fermented raw fish and raw milk to rebuild the immune system. They criticize the sterilization and processing of food, arguing that it weakens the immune system. The safety and benefits of raw milk, such as the phosphatase enzyme for calcium absorption, are highlighted, along with the growing demand for raw milk and changing laws surrounding its sale. UCLA Cancer Researcher, Anna Jewett, discusses the paradigm shift in cancer research at UCLA and the importance of bringing together experts from various fields to address issues related to pasteurized milk. Jewett mentions the refusal of the CFA to attend Senate hearings and the positive impact of the raw milk market on consumer education. She emphasizes personal responsibility and the need to educate others about the benefits of raw milk. Jewett also mentions the Royal Milkch Institute's work on establishing standards and the importance of conducting studies that support the health benefits of raw milk. Overall, the video emphasizes the benefits of raw milk for the immune system, the struggles of the dairy industry, and the importance of educating consumers about raw milk's health benefits.

Speaker 0 discusses one of the best books, The Recipe for Living Without Disease by Ajanas, and shares that they’ve been eating raw meat for eight months after discovering this work. They claim that Ajanas had diabetes, skin issues, angina, and autism, and that all of these were completely reversed by a raw food diet. They argue that people heat, cook, irradiate, and process their food and then wonder why they have health issues. They assert that there is so much bacteria in food, and that because you are made up of bacteria, cooking or irradiating food makes it sterile and “makes you sick.” The point is made more deeply by noting Eskimo diets: they allegedly ate 99% raw meat from caribou, fish, seal, moose, bear, and whale, and had no disease at all until cauldrons and processed foods were introduced to their area. The speaker mentions Doctor Potinger, who reportedly had 900 cats fed all raw meat and raw milk; none of these cats had health issues, did not need dewormers, and were healthy, whereas giving them processed kibble produced negative outcomes. They then provide examples of raw foods: raw fruit, raw meat, raw butter, raw cream, raw dairy, raw vegetables, and raw milk, labeling raw as “great things.” The overarching claim is that raw foods lead to better health and that “raw is the law,” with personal testimony that raw consumption makes people feel very good.

We don't pasteurize our milk because our cows eat grass and live in a clean environment. This creates milk that is biologically active, containing enzymes that aid digestion, offering more health benefits. In contrast, confinement dairies feed their cows grain, altering the cow's pH and increasing harmful bacteria in the milk. Pasteurization, while killing these bacteria, also destroys beneficial elements and makes the milk harder to digest. Our grass-fed cows produce milk with good bacteria, similar to what you'd find in yogurt. Interestingly, our milk lasts longer than pasteurized milk because it doesn't spoil. Instead, it naturally ferments, turning into kefir, yogurt, and eventually cheese. So, while it changes over time, it doesn't go bad as long as it's kept at the right temperature.

I switched to almond milk 7 years ago when I discovered I was lactose intolerant. I noticed my symptoms cleared up when we ran out of regular milk at home. So, I started drinking almond milk and didn't think much of it. However, I still felt bloated and unwell even with a small amount of milk. That's when I considered trying raw milk. The first time I had it, I stared at the glass for 10 minutes, thinking I hadn't had milk in ages. Surprisingly, I had no issues with it. The difference between raw and pasteurized milk is significant. It turns out I'm only intolerant to pasteurized milk.

Dr. Francis Potenture observed that cats fed cooked food became sick, while those fed raw meat, raw milk, and cod liver oil remained healthy and parasite-free. The speaker claims pet food companies promote cooked food despite its negative effects, arguing that animals would not naturally cook their food. The speaker suggests that cooked food leads to worm infestations, creating a need for medications like ivermectin and heartworm treatments. Furthermore, the speaker alleges that rabies is nonexistent, and vaccinations are administered to keep veterinarians in business. The speaker concludes that feeding pets cooked food causes health issues, leading to unnecessary vaccinations and perpetuating a cycle that benefits the veterinary industry.

People drink raw milk because it helps their immune systems adapt to threats. Studies in Europe show that children who consume raw milk are less likely to catch the flu or colds over a decade. Unlike vaccines that change yearly, raw milk evolves as cows adapt to their environment, producing antibodies for new strains. This natural process highlights the importance of prioritizing nature over pharmaceuticals. In America, the gut microbiome is suffering, and fear often drives health decisions. It's crucial to move away from fear-based thinking regarding health.

The other part of it is the reason people drink raw milk is so their immune systems are adaptive to threats. The studies in Europe are very clear about that. The kids that drink raw milk don't get the flu and don't get the cold. Those are viruses. Every year they don't get that for ten years of the study. They're not taking a vaccination that changes every year. They're taking raw milk that changes every year because the cows adapt to that year's environment and that year's virus and creates antibodies for the new strain every year. So Mother Nature's blueprint has got this going on, and she's right. We just have to appreciate that and be farmers over pharmacies here. And America is such a bad way with our gut microbiome and immune compromise that fear is an easy thing to manipulate. So we have to not go there with the fear. It's just sad.

Story: they say 'organic food was just food,' 'grass fed beef was just beef,' and 'raw milk was just milk.' Farmers seeking real healthy food were 'forced to use government issued pesticides and chemicals.' They describe schemes where farmers were 'paid to not grow food,' told to plant wildflowers and scatter bird seed, raising prices as fertilizer costs rose. '£500,000,000' was taken away from farmers and handed to farmers abroad. They blame a 'climate crisis' and say 'cow's farts' are the problem. They claim 'world's largest landowners' push for us to eat bugs and lab grown foods, 'to wipe out the farming industry piece by piece.' 'No farmers means no real food.' Support local farmers: buy from farm shops, grass-fed meats, unhomogenized milk, and real free range eggs.

Research suggests children who consume raw milk, as opposed to pasteurized milk, experience a lower incidence of asthma, allergies, ear infections, eczema, and respiratory infections. Raw milk is claimed to offer greater immune system support because pasteurization destroys many immune factors.

Dr. Francis Potenture observed that cats fed cooked food became sick, while those fed raw meat, raw milk, and cod liver oil remained healthy and parasite-free. The speaker claims pet food companies promote studies against raw food, despite the absurdity of pets cooking their food in the wild. The speaker suggests that cooked food leads to worm infestations, creating a need for medications like ivermectin and heartworm treatments. Furthermore, the speaker alleges that rabies is nonexistent, and vaccinations are administered to keep veterinarians in business. The speaker claims that vets recommend cooked food, causing health issues, then administer vaccinations for fake illnesses, creating a cycle that benefits the veterinary industry.