TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The El Salvador president highlights hidden messages in the US financial system. High taxes aren't the issue; they don't fund the government. Instead, the government relies on printing money through treasury bonds, creating an illusion that taxes support it. This unsustainable system could lead to a collapse if not addressed by the next US president. Changes are needed to prevent a crisis like those in the past. Time is running out to avoid repeating history.

Speaker 0 argues that the system is a scam, noting that retirees living on $2,000–$3,000 a month is impossible because money is spent as it comes in. He cites $35 trillion in debt and $2 trillion in American taxpayers’ credit card debt, warning of a looming run on the city and questioning why Social Security money is taxed again. He reflects on personal pension and union involvement and asserts that people will need to work longer. Speaker 1 counters by outlining the history and current state of Social Security. He notes that Social Security began as a 2% tax with a promise it would never exceed 6% of income, but now it takes 12.4%, with projections (CBO or Social Security trustees) suggesting 15.8% to 17.5% in the future. He states that originally promised tax caps were not maintained and that money taken from workers’ paychecks has been spent immediately to pay promised benefits for the past thirteen years. He argues that the system benefits higher earners disproportionately and imposes a larger burden on lower-income workers, who have less left to save for retirement, and highlights disparities in life expectancy, noting that one in four African American men may die between 45 and 64 after paying into the system. He asserts that lower-income and African American workers risk receiving little or nothing in return. Speaker 0 asks for a solution. Speaker 1 proposes shifting toward a universal benefit system, bending benefits for middle and upper income earners while increasing them for lower-income earners, indexing retirement age to life expectancy, and using a more accurate inflation index. He suggests workers should have an option to invest money in something that earns a positive return and cannot be spent by Congress. Speaker 0 shares a personal perspective about his two young sons paying into Social Security and questions whether they will receive any benefits. Speaker 1 responds that younger workers will likely see some benefits, but not what has been promised. Speaker 2 adds that pensions and Social Security both provide guaranteed income, and introduces protected retirement solutions with step-ups and lock-ins that address market volatility. He credits Secure Act 1.0 and 2.0 for enabling these options and advocates adding at least one of four types of plans—401(k), 457, 403(b)—to provide Americans with retirement options and assurances about what they will get in retirement. Speaker 0 notes that young people ask why they can’t invest in their own 401(k) instead of Social Security, and Speaker 2 responds positively, stating there is a place for Social Security, pensions, and 401(k) plans, and that the right questions about savings are being asked.

The speaker discusses taxation without representation in the US, highlighting how Americans pay roughly 50% of their income in various taxes. They break down the different taxes they pay, including income tax, property tax, and sales tax, showing how it adds up to nearly 50%. Despite this high tax burden, they express frustration at the lack of benefits and services they receive in return, such as affordable healthcare, nutritious food, and quality infrastructure. The speaker criticizes the government for not adequately representing the interests of taxpayers.

The speaker discusses the United States government being a foreign corporation and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) operating as a separate entity. They claim that individuals are unknowingly enslaved through the attachment of their birth certificates to a stock exchange number. The speaker also mentions the manipulation of court proceedings and the need to dissolve the corporation, ban the Federal Reserve, and return to common law. They suggest that court systems are connected to the stock market and individuals are traded like derivatives. The speaker predicts a collapse and urges people to take action.

Speaker 0 argues that there is a shift toward bankers increasingly controlling both monetary and fiscal policy, describing it as a "financial coup d'etat." They claim that for centuries there has been a balance of power between the people's representatives who control fiscal policy (taxation) and bankers who control monetary policy. According to Speaker 0, bankers have decided to use digital technology to assert control over both sides of government policy, leveraging CBDCs (central bank digital currencies), stablecoins, and asset tokens as programmable money. They assert that this move is underway and cite Davos as evidence, noting that Larry Fink, the acting co-chair of the World Economic Forum, is aggressively promoting the idea of moving the entire financial system into a digital control grid. The speaker contends that the descriptions of the bankers’ intentions are becoming very open and explicit, and that the result would be the abolition or collapse of the republic in favor of a system where bankers control both monetary and fiscal policy. The speaker questions whether legislative representatives would remain in any executive or ceremonial role, describing the future as fluid and capable of many directions. They emphasize that the transition has been very incremental for decades, facilitated by the federal government not running its financial statements and operations in accordance with the law and not disclosing them properly. This, they claim, has allowed the shift to occur with the public largely unaware or complacent. Speaker 0 notes that many Americans have accepted the current system because they benefit from it in the short term—“as long as I get my check, I’m okay with the system as it is.” They frame this acceptance as part of the reason the changes have progressed with limited public pushback. In sum, the speaker contends that the bankers are moving to extend control from monetary policy into fiscal policy through digital technologies and programmable money, a process they describe as a quiet, long-running coup that could redefine the balance of power in government.

The speaker discusses how the federal income tax negatively impacted Americans by shifting the government's revenue source from tariffs to taxing individuals. They argue that tariffs on international corporations would be a better revenue source, promoting American manufacturing and job growth. The speaker highlights the historical importance of tariffs and criticizes the impact of the income tax on American prosperity. They emphasize the need to educate future generations on these issues.

In the exchange, Speaker 0 argues that a financial coup began policies that reduced health life expectancy, noting that to balance the budget without increasing retirement funding, one could extend retirement age or lower life expectancy, or both. Speaker 0 asserts that during the pandemic the operation was carried out by people who allegedly stole large sums of money, suggesting that the pandemic is connected to those alleged thefts. Speaker 1 responds, acknowledging the connection as “a great connection,” and the conversation continues to map how money moves through the U.S. financial system. Speaker 0 offers a simplified mechanism: every day, primary dealers working with the New York Federal Reserve borrow money by selling treasury bonds and bills to IRAs and pension funds. The pension funds buy treasury bonds, moving money into a Treasury account at the New York Fed, and then that money “disappears out the back door.” He references a 2017 study by Dr. Skidmore that documented 21 trillion dollars as missing, noting that at that moment the outstanding U.S. debt was 21 trillion. This leads to the question of whether the United States has too much debt or if there has been a large-scale bank robbery. Speaker 2 interjects that there is “Too much theft,” agreeing with the critical view of the system described. Speaker 0 reframes the issue by explaining that as a citizen, the pension fund you contributed to is not an asset but an IOU to yourself as a taxpayer, because the bonds have a call on all assets. He emphasizes that the bonds are an obligation tied to taxpayers, and questions what the Department of Defense would do if confronted with the disclosure that “we disappeared 20,000,000,000,000 of your money,” noting that the money disappeared from DOD accounts at the New York Fed and could have been sent to Basel, Switzerland, offshore, or elsewhere. The core argument centers on a sequence: the movement of funds from pension investments into Treasury securities, the apparent disappearance of those funds from the system, and the larger claim that a coordinated theft or misappropriation underpins national debt and policy decisions. Speaker 0 reiterates that, in this narrative, the DOD allegedly played a role in the disappearance of funds, framing the situation as one where money funded through pension accounts and Treasury bonds could be diverted or hidden, with the implication that such actions relate to the broader mechanisms of debt and national financial management.

Speaker 0: There is no law. And to date, nobody has been able to show that there is a law for the average American citizen working day in and day out to pay an income tax. Speaker 1: But We, The People Foundation for Constitutional Education put a full page ad in The USA Today on 07/07/2000. And within the body of that ad was a $50,000 challenge for anyone that could show the law. And to me, $50,000 is a lot of money. So I went after that and did the research based on the fact that I thought, let's put this baby to bed. I'm hearing all these rumors. You know, I'm gonna kill two birds with one stone. I'll answer these people's questions they're asking me, and then I win this $50,000. And, you know, based on the research that I did throughout the year 2000 and that I'm still doing, I have not found that law. I've asked congress. We've asked a lot of people in the IRS, IRS commissioners, helpers. They can't answer because if they answer, the American people are gonna know that this whole thing is a fraud. Speaker 2: There is no law. There is no law that requires the average American worker in the private sector to pay a direct unapportioned tax on their labor and compensation for services. There is no law. Speaker 3: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code, that requires you to file a tax return. Of course, there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but sure. So, naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to him. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't find the statute that clearly made a person liable, at least not me and, most people I know. And I had no no choice in my mind except to to resign. Speaker 4: I had to leave the IRS because I presented, evidence that I had accumulated indicating that the agency was violating the law and violating people's rights. And I asked the agency for a response to my sincere concerns, and the answer I got was that they would not respond to my concerns and that they would, provide me with the paperwork necessary to tender my resignation. Speaker 5: You can look through the statutes and look for the law that requires you to pay. And when you do that, you can't identify a law that requires the average person in America who earns a wage and works in private business to pay an income tax. Speaker 2: American citizens, along with the foundation, have been asking the IRS to specifically provide them with the the underlying legal foundation upon which they administer and enforce the personal income tax laws in our country. Speaker 3: At the national level, when people would attempt to contact somebody of a much higher authority, say the cons the commissioner, same kind of thing. They wouldn't get they would get answers that were in effect non answers. Speaker 6: You have to understand that an agency which will unlawfully impose a tax that doesn't exist it's not gonna care. If we, the people, don't know what our rights are, they're not gonna tell us. Speaker 4: If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them, that that enough that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it. Speaker 7: 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government. People have been told, you know, that you need this income tax system to fund government, is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, my question is, well, if that's true, how did we fund government from 1776 to 1913? Speaker 8: The main purpose of the income tax is not to raise revenue, but to redistribute wealth and to control society. And a lot Speaker 9: of people might say, well, gee, if there wasn't an income tax, what would happen to education? They don't understand that education is paid for, for the most part, out of state and local taxes, your property tax. People might say, well, how are we going to build and maintain our highways if there's no money coming into the government? We need our highways. There is a tax on every gallon of gasoline that people buy. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for highway construction. Speaker 10: I believe that in both spirit and substance, our tax system has come to be un American. Death and taxes may be inevitable, but unjust taxes

Speaker 0 states that those who own and utilize technology are becoming phenomenally richer. This issue relates to tax reform and addressing massive income and wealth inequality in America. Speaker 1 raises the concern that taxes go to an incompetent, corrupt government. Speaker 1 expresses a willingness to pay more taxes if they felt they lived in a better country where everyone is surviving and doing well. Speaker 0 concludes that this relates to the issue of how to revitalize American democracy.

The speaker believes that banks and governments act nefariously by taking risks with people's money while avoiding real consequences due to bailouts or bail-ins. They argue that the current inflation is a result of massive quantitative easing during COVID, which is essentially a tax on the people. They reference Henry Ford's statement about a potential revolution if Americans were aware of the banking system's workings.

Speaker 0 argues that openly acknowledging that Americans are effectively slaves is deeply disliked by the American public, because they have long been told that the United States is the freest country in the world. The speaker asserts that this belief is incorrect, stating, “We are not the freest country in the world. We're actually the only country in the world that is asked to go to work then pay most of our money back to the government when you add it all up.” The speaker anticipates a counterpoint from listeners who think they only pay a 30 percent tax, and rejects it by saying, “No. You don't. Add up all the other tax you pay. What's that add up to?” He emphasizes that this is “the actual percentage you tax,” and notes that for almost all people, “that's over 50% if you pay tax.” The implication drawn is that a person’s work essentially funds the government, and the speaker insists that in recognizing this, one must acknowledge a form of servitude. The core conclusion presented is that if people are living to work primarily to provide the government with the majority of their money, then they are, in effect, “legitimately slaves to the government.” The speaker reiterates that people “exist to fund the government,” and wraps up with the emphatic statement, “Okay? That is not free.”

Speaker 0 argues that money controllers make all rules and that America has become a socialist communist country, not capitalistic, because of a central bank. He says a central bank prevents capitalism and that prosperity is created by printing dollars or injecting digits into the economy, which results in an infusion of credit rather than real manufacturing or prosperity. Speaker 1 summarizes as a money planned economy. Speaker 0 asserts that with the creation of the Federal Reserve System, the government became dependent on private banks for money, and began taxing people. He states Social Security started in 1935, issuing Social Security cards with numbers on them and deducting money from paychecks under the belief it would fund retirement. He says income tax followed, enabled by Social Security, and notes the government now takes money out automatically, implying distrust of public willingness to pay. Speaker 1 comments that the government now controls the tax payment itself and that people are effectively slaves because taxes are taken automatically. Speaker 0 contends that through the Federal Reserve System, the government has become vested in bankers who profit from taxation, and that the bankers have taken control of the government, making Republicans and Democrats essentially the same since neither party proposes shutting down the Fed or stopping taxes or addressing major American issues. Speaker 1 introduces a personal connection: Nick Rockefeller, of the Rockefeller family, who, through an attorney, discussed with Speaker 0 the banking industry’s ultimate plan. Speaker 0 claims they discussed a global banking network, asserting that central banks exist worldwide, including in Germany, England, and Italy, and that central banking is part of the Communist Manifesto. He argues that two major planks—central banking and a graduated income tax—have been adopted in the United States as part of the Communist Manifesto, integrated via the Federal Reserve System. Speaker 0 then outlines the ultimate goal: to create a one-world government run by bankers, implemented in sections via the European currency, the euro, and the European constitution. He claims there is an effort to establish a North American Union in the United States and to create a new currency called the AMERO, all contributing to a worldwide government. Speaker 0 describes a future where every person is chipped with RFID, and all money exists in those chips. He claims money could be deducted digitally from the chip by authorities, eliminating cash, effectively giving total control to the authorities. He says protesters could have their chips turned off, leaving them unable to buy food or do anything, equating this to total control over people. Speaker 1 adds that the chip would be connected to a database containing purchasing records and other personal data. Speaker 0 reiterates the goal of a one-world government controlled by the banking industry, with everyone chipped and all money stored in chips, allowing control over every financial transaction and making people slaves or serfs to the bankers.

Speaker 0: The Federal Reserve has revealed that US NGOs have assets totaling $14,200,000,000,000, more than the combined twenty twenty five GDP estimates for Japan, Germany, and India combined. India and Japan's GDP each just over $4,000,000,000,000, Germany $5,000,000,000,000, together about $13,500,000,000,000. The combined assets held by US NGOs equal $14,200,000,000,000 of your tax money and that of your children and grandchildren and great great great great great grandchildren. Ever wonder why everything is so absolutely unaffordable today? It's not actually rocket science. Government has forgotten the fundamental reasons for which it was formed, to serve and protect our civil liberties. It has inverted the entire formula and decided that we are the ones here to serve, to work, and through our individual labors to support their desires and the behemoth of a bureaucracy that has emanated from those desires. Merry Christmas, America.

Forget the elections; they are a charade meant to create the illusion of choice. The true owners of this country are the wealthy, who systematically transfer wealth from the poor to the rich. This process has intensified under the current government, which operates like a fascist regime where corporations effectively control the state. Fascism in America won't look like historical examples; it will be disguised in everyday attire. The reality is that poverty is rising, and the rich are getting richer, while the poor continue to suffer.

The speaker explains that the Federal Reserve is a private bank owned by private stockholders, not the government. They discuss how the Fed loans money to banks and the government, which must be paid back with interest. The speaker questions where the Fed gets its money and reveals that it is printed by the United States Mint. They argue that the Fed's control over printing money is unconstitutional and leads to the devaluation of the dollar. The speaker also mentions a secret meeting in 1910 where the plan for the Federal Reserve was devised. They criticize the creation of the IRS and how taxes are used to pay back the Fed's debts.

Speaker 0 expresses concern over the treatment of Americans by their leaders and questions why people continue to pay taxes to those who seem indifferent to their suffering. They claim not to understand why people would financially support a system that appears to disregard their well-being, citing the fentanyl crisis as an example. Speaker 1 suggests that people pay taxes due to a pattern of "show trials" designed to intimidate the population. They claim that these trials, such as Steve Bannon's imprisonment, serve as a reminder that anyone could be targeted, thus chilling dissent and maintaining compliance.

The National Security Agency has been tracking illicit wealth for 15 years. It is now known that Wall Street has stolen trillions of dollars through naked short selling and laundered money from illegal activities. The speaker believes that 90% of people in the US government and military are good but trapped in a corrupt system. The CIA is accused of torture, rendition, drone assassinations, and starting wars based on lies. The speaker claims that once the President processes all the information at the NSA, everyone will be exposed and they suggest making a deal through truth and reconciliation.

The speaker claims the United States is rapidly moving in the direction of oligarchy. They state the country is increasingly becoming an oligarchy and evolving into an oligarchic society. The speaker asserts that under Donald Trump, the country is hurtling rapidly toward oligarchy, and a handful of billionaires are moving the entire planet toward an oligarchic society. They also claim a particular budget moves the country rapidly in the direction of oligarchy.

A concern is raised about the power of public corporations that receive public funds and trade on the stock exchange. It is suggested that these corporations act like sovereign countries, with their own military arm, vehicles, and radar systems, potentially undermining the United States government. The speaker also expresses distress over advanced technologies, such as healthcare, transportation, and energy, being withheld from the American people. This includes technologies that could eradicate diseases in seconds. A warning is given to the government, stating that when the underserved and underprivileged population becomes aware of the billions spent on these programs instead of addressing their needs, a bloodless revolution may occur. The speaker emphasizes that the consequences will be faced by those in power, not the speaker themselves.

The El Salvador president highlights hidden messages in the US financial system. High taxes are not the main issue; the problem lies in taxes not truly funding the government. The government relies on printing money backed by Treasury bonds, creating a bubble that could burst. If Americans and the world realize this, it could lead to a loss of currency confidence. Structural changes are needed to prevent a crisis.

The speaker discusses how the US is under a secret constitution, where tax dollars go to pay interest to the Federal Reserve instead of services. They mention the financing of the country through poppy fields in Afghanistan and the birth certificate system creating debtors in court. This system turns citizens into property, not seen as US citizens but as entities tied to their birth certificates.

High taxes in the US aren't the main issue; they don't fund the government. The government is financed by printing money through treasury bonds bought by the Fed. This creates an illusion that taxes support the government, but it's really money printing. If this truth is widely known, it could lead to a currency crisis. The next US president must make significant changes to prevent a collapse. Winning elections won't fix the problem; a complete overhaul of the government is necessary. It will be tough, but it's essential to secure the country's future.

The speaker claims that high taxes are not the core financial problem in the United States. They argue that taxes don't truly fund the government, which is instead financed by treasury bonds purchased by the Federal Reserve. The Fed buys these bonds by printing money, which is backed by the bonds themselves. Taxes exist, according to the speaker, to maintain the illusion of government funding. The speaker contends that the government is funded by printing money backed by paper, creating a bubble. If the public were to realize this, confidence in the dollar would collapse, potentially leading to the fall of Western civilization. The speaker urges the next president to implement necessary policy and structural changes to avoid this outcome.

These are the scariest times in Speaker 1's lifetime. It's not just tax breaks for billionaires and cuts to programs for working people, but that combined with the power of the oligarchy. Speaker 1 mentions Musk owning Twitter and Bezos converting his editorial staff into a right-wing entity, plus Trump suing media outlets and threatening PBS and NPR. Beyond money, there's a movement toward authoritarianism. Trump unilaterally cutting federal funding passed by Congress is illegal and unconstitutional. The Vice President suggesting courts can't stop unconstitutional acts is also authoritarian. Speaker 1 believes there's an attempt to end the checks and balances created by the founding fathers with the legislative, executive, and judiciary branches. Speaker 1 confirms there is gravity in their voice because this is a scary moment.

The government can take your money, tax the sunrise and the trees, and collect fees from businesses. They mix it up with eyes to make it all taste good. The government takes everything to pay for solutions like healthcare, climate change, and pollution, even if it means throwing away the Constitution. They can give a bailout and tell us to behave, making the founding fathers roll over in their graves. The government makes mistakes and is power-hungry, with fictitious economics. Instead of getting fired for failure, they give themselves a raise.