TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

It's important narratives to this point, to our research, in my opinion. We have the Pontificate College, Josephinum, where Joseph comes over to The USA from Germany in 1867. Three years later, he becomes a priest and has his own church within a few months. And he gets to buy the house next door, of course, to support 12 orphans. And do we all know about the orphans at this point? Possibly a repopulation tactic that was going on in the eighteen hundreds. It's very interesting. Was it only 12 orphans, or was this one of the places that they would send the orphans through to get them into society? Because who would ever question Joseph the priest from the eighteen hundreds? You know, the guy that just randomly shows up from Germany, has all the money ready to buy houses somehow to support orphans. It all checks out, of course. Simple stuff for Joseph. This was known as the Saint Joseph Orphan Asylum. It grew so rapidly for some weird and, of course, very random reason that five years after it began, Joseph moved road. That going a little that going to this operation the worked. It would go through churches. They would bring a manager type over from Europe. Call them a priest. Give them a house. Give them the resources to run these operations, purchasing new buildings with ease to run the program. So not only do you new facility Joseph was just finding and saying was his. I wanna wasn't building anything. He was given these buildings. They were already there from the previous civilization. So the new building gave the orphans a training in the trades. So this Joseph guy was obviously sent with a purpose, to repopulate repopulate and teach to a brand new society, one that didn't have any skills. This right here is how you reset a society's technology level. The teacher is never in charge of what the students learn. This Joseph character is a teacher of a class. He is not the principal of the school. There are many schools. He is clearly taking direction as to what the students of the new society will learn. There were many classes like this one all over the country happening simultaneously. This was an operation. This went on for twelve years with zero backstory, finds the Collegium, Josephinum. This massive college is just found and ready to roll. No clue where the money came from. No mention of how many men were needed to build this place. Just found it. And its first class of 23 men began. It's unbelievable. This is one of the most important stories to our research in my opinion because it shows exactly how the operation took place. It's actually laying it all out there and shows us exactly how they repopulated these regions in The USA. It shows us the operation with the orphans, the teaching programs, and this was our base for our technological knowledge. Whoever controlled this operation from the top has all of the technology from the previous civilization and is controlling what technology we get to have, and they've clearly been doing this for a very long time. And for anyone that's on the fence, we have the Saint Vincent's Infant Asylum located in Baltimore where we have tunnels under the ground. This infant asylum was in use in the mid eighteen hundreds during the same time period as German transferred Joseph. And what do you know? In the early nineteen hundreds, the operation was done, and they declined new orphans. 1941, they changed us to apartments. And in 2015, they light it up and try to destroy it with a It gets more and more obvious if you're still on the fence. Let's go even deeper. We have the Saint Mary's Orphan Asylum located in Galveston, Texas, where they tell us that this one is haunted. Now I've talked about hauntings before briefly. I'm not gonna say that there aren't any hauntings, but when it comes to these old world buildings, I think it was a tactic to keep people away from them. So we have yet again another orphan operation going on in the mid eighteen hundreds, and I'm just gonna let you know that this is going on and on and on. There were so many orphan operations going on in the mid eighteen hundreds because this was how they were repopulating these cities. So where were all these kids' parents? Is this where a lot of our families originated from? Is this why the family trees in The USA almost all end around the same time period? We are told hundreds of fire stories through the first 52 episodes. We know that that is the key and the nod that it's a building that was constructed by the previous civilization. The Saint Mary's Orphan Asylum. For anyone wondering where the parents of these orphans were, you might wanna check the other asylum, the insane asylum, because they were not going along with the reset. Here's a graph showing that the insane asylums are disappearing over time, and I wonder why. Good thing they cared so much about us in 1955 and 1965 because surely that was the fix. Oh. Oh, it wasn't? And then a fire had devastated the Saint Mary's Orphan Asylum in 1875. If anyone is still on the fence, there is room over here to get off the fence. And honestly, who would wanna sit on top of a fence anyway? So we have Ohio, Baltimore, Texas. We have all these towns and cities being repopulated. Brand new people, brand new social structures, brand new mindsets, and resetting what people are taught. This all happened around a hundred and fifty years ago. So this is all very new. This isn't thousands of years ago. Then we have another very interesting aspect of this in Germany. During the same exact time period, and remember, we also have good old Joseph of their family's home and tell them what to think, and then test them on it. Failing the test will then lower your self esteem, putting a social pressure on children to agree with this new way of taught, or they will be called dumb and get an f. This is an operation. It's all connected, and it's designed to enslave the world's population. Year after year, we are all taught a false narrative. We've all been brainwashed in the thinking that you are either smart or dumb based on a curriculum that holds zero value in the real world. Now who knows if this Frederick Froebel was even a real character, but they do admit that kindergarten starts in Germany around the exact same time period that we're talking about, the mid eighteen hundreds. So I wanted to tie it all in with the rest of the world. This is a worldwide operation. This is not just The USA. We have a lot of things in The USA being controlled through Germany during this time period, especially the education aspect of it. And I wanna point out that, yes, we have borders and division now. We have so many countries in the world, and everyone is separated. And you're unable to travel to other lands unless you have a piece of paper that is registered and checked at the checkpoints. But who's to say that there even was a border in the previous civilization? Were there so called elected leaders controlling everyone, deciding what we can and cannot do? Could they have had a truly free life where they were able to travel wherever they want freely and not feel like they're invading someone else's territory? I would say, in my opinion, this was the world that was here before the reset. And something happened where this past civilization was wiped out, and their technology was stolen by a group, and some of it

Laser technology constructed the elaborate buildings of the past. It's impossible that they were carved with simple tools or built without advanced electrical machines. The intricate detail shows how advanced the human mind was during those ancient periods. What we've been told as history doesn't align with the evidence before our very eyes. That's because history is "his story."

In the past, being on the wrong side of history meant becoming a serf or laborer. Now, being left behind means being irrelevant and worthless. People may turn to drugs and computer games for meaning. The future may involve connecting all bodies and brains to a network for survival.

Free energy has been concealed from us to control our lives. Our ancestors possessed knowledge beyond our imagination, while we currently know very little as a species.

Speaker 0 asks if there is a technology that can solve their problem. Speaker 1 responds that the problem lies within themselves, as they lack the will to change. Speaker 0 then asks for help, but Speaker 1 explains that they cannot change their nature and how they treat the world. Speaker 0 mentions that every civilization reaches a crisis point, to which Speaker 1 replies that most don't make it. Speaker 0 asks how Speaker 1's civilization survived, and Speaker 1 explains that their sun was dying, forcing them to evolve. Speaker 0 realizes that they are also on the brink of destruction and states that it is at the precipice that people find the will to change and evolve.

In the future, the question of why we need so many humans will arise. The current answer seems to be keeping them content with drugs and computer games.

There are stars billions of years older than our sun, and many likely have planets. This raises the possibility of civilizations far more advanced than ours. However, predicting their capabilities is challenging, much like the inaccurate forecasts of 19th-century technology regarding the 20th century.

According to the speaker, the presented information signals the end of human-dominated history, not the end of history itself. In five years, a technology will exist capable of independent decision-making and idea creation. This is unprecedented because previous technologies, from stone knives to nuclear bombs, could not make decisions independently. For example, President Truman, not the atom bomb, decided to drop the bomb on Hiroshima. Furthermore, past technologies only replicated human ideas, disseminating music, poems, and novels written by humans. Now, technology can generate entirely new ideas on a scale beyond human capabilities.

In our hidden history, these buildings were not just for decoration. They were designed to generate free energy from the ether above and distribute it throughout our realm. We are not the most advanced civilization to have existed here. We are simply living in a post-apocalyptic world, surrounded by evidence of past greatness. Explore the concept of the mud flood and question everything.

There is a small elite group that prioritizes its own interests over the majority of the population. This has happened before in history and will likely happen again. One of the biggest threats to the planet is the idea of a technological utopia, as it may only benefit the elite. In a worst-case scenario, the elite would have a Noah's Ark-like refuge while the rest of the people and the ecosystem suffer. The elite believes they can create this technological refuge.

Our modern systems of communication, such as telephones, telegraph, radio, and television, are extensions of our nervous system, but they also mean the end of privacy. In the future, technology may allow for visual images in addition to voice communication. Everyone would be equipped with a device that connects them to others, eliminating privacy and individuality. The fear is that a single individual, the controller, would have access to everyone's thoughts while keeping their own private. As technology advances, traditional methods of communication like roads, rails, and wires are disappearing. Eventually, personal gadgets will vanish, and communication will happen through telepathy. Technology is not creating new communication methods, but rather discovering what has always existed. The ultimate goal is to instantly read each other's thoughts, which would bring us closer to understanding one another.

Contrary to conspiracy theories, implanting chips in people's brains isn't necessary to control or manipulate them. Throughout history, language and storytelling have been used by prophets, poets, and politicians to shape society. Now, AI has the potential to do the same. It has hacked into the operating system of human civilization, possibly marking the end of human dominance in history.

What are the chances we’ve messed everything up? About 50%. While total destruction seems unlikely without a massive war, Stephen Hawking estimated a 1% chance of total annihilation each century. A more pressing concern is whether civilization will be less capable in the future. Historically, civilizations like the Sumerians, Egyptians, and Romans have peaked and declined, raising the question of our technological progress in the next century. Although it’s likely to improve, predicting the future is challenging due to numerous variables. The hope is that people will learn from history, recognize current issues, and take action to mitigate risks, aiming to preserve and enhance our extraordinary achievements.

The discussion centers on a fear of a posthuman future and the idea that the most evil outcome for humanity would be to be eliminated or turned into “technoplastic beings.” The speakers describe some libertarian oligarchs as viewing humans as little more than bootloaders for digital intelligence, a perception held by many in tech leadership. They argue that a common goal among these tech oligarchs is to live forever, “in defiance of natural law,” using technology to become gods. They name the cofounders of Google as among those open about such aims and reference Jeffrey Epstein as well, describing him as someone “very interested in Eugenics and AI” and in technologies for those same ends. A group of billionaires is characterized as wanting to use these technologies to better themselves and to “live forever while the rest of us become cognitively incapable of questioning what ultimately is amount to slavery.” The speaker asserts that we should say no to this. In considering where to find hope amid these concerns, the speaker acknowledges the darkness of the subject but argues it is not hopeless. The reasoning presented is that these systems require consent to become effective; if people do not use them, they cannot achieve their aims. There is a focus on the active push to implement digital systems on large existing user bases, such as those of major social media platforms. However, the counterforce is that if people decline to use these systems, or leave the platforms, or stop using the associated digital infrastructure, the systems will collapse. Key points include: the threat of a posthuman, “technoplastic” future in which humans could be subsumed or enslaved through digital intelligence; the explicit goal among some tech leaders to achieve immortality through technology, contrasted with the supposed subtraction of humanity’s cognitive capacity in others; the claim that certain billionaires have openly discussed these ambitions, including examples like Google’s cofounders and Epstein, framed as a long-running, deliberate project; and the belief that resistance is possible by withdrawing consent and participation, thereby undermining the viability of these digital systems. Overall, the argument emphasizes both the ominous potential of advanced technologies to redefine humanity and the practical avenue of refusing participation to prevent such a future from taking hold.

Throughout history, people have used language and storytelling to manipulate and control others, without the need for brain implants. This has been done by prophets, poets, and politicians for centuries. Now, with the advancement of AI, it is becoming increasingly possible for technology to have the same influence.

Our past generations have created an immoral and destructive society, and we are all responsible for it. We are trapped by this society, but can we deeply transform our condition and understand our consciousness? Civilization emerged with a new mindset, leading to organized rule and social development. Technology's danger depends on the wielder's mindset. If we assess those in power based on their track record, transhumanism seems to offer a bleak future for most people.