TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Vaccine court has thousands of individuals who claim vaccines caused their children's autism, with supporting documentation. This presents an opportunity to study these children and identify common factors that may have made them susceptible to injury. The speaker has inquired why such a study hasn't been conducted. The responses given are inadequate, such as suggesting someone else should do it or citing privacy concerns. The speaker believes parents would gladly share records for research if approached with trust. The speaker suspects the lack of interest stems from a pre-existing knowledge of the answer, echoing Dr. Healy's suggestion that the question is deliberately avoided.

My son loved hockey and got vaccinated despite his fear of needles. He experienced severe symptoms after the shot and passed away shortly after. The doctor failed to properly diagnose him. I want the truth about vaccine deaths and closure for my son. Another doctor confirmed that the vaccine caused his death. Many others have similar stories, and we need to address the issue of vaccine injuries.

The speaker presents a resolution addressing the alarming number of unexplained deaths in the country. They share data showing 262,000 deaths in 2021 and 67,000 deaths in 2022. The committee agrees to investigate this issue, specifically focusing on the 213,984 excess deaths. The motion is approved, and they move on to the next agenda item.

The speaker asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The claim is that for the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, and that hundreds of infants and toddlers died after these shots, often from SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker emphasizes that these shots are killing some of these children, with most deaths occurring within about two weeks after the shot, and forty percent dying within one week. The speaker notes that the temporality checks out and that most of these deaths occurred at ages one to one and a half, right when they receive the MMR shots. The speaker reports that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The speaker describes babies dying in their sleep as a result of these shots and calls the situation absolutely disturbing and particular in terms of the causes of death. In summary, the speaker states that all of this combined in the study shows unequivocally that these shots are deadly, and concludes that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore. The suggestion is to split them up if parents still want them, rather than administering the full combination.

The speakers discuss a study of 325 autopsies of individuals who died shortly after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. According to the speakers, this is the largest autopsy series of its kind. A rigorous review of the autopsies allegedly found that the vaccine caused or contributed to approximately 74% of the sudden deaths. This study is claimed to be a peer-reviewed paper that is going to be published. One speaker states that they are the senior author of this study. The speakers anticipate a "tsunami of evidence" regarding the harm caused by COVID-19 vaccines in children, pregnant women, and adults. They urge politicians to acknowledge and address this issue.

There has been a significant increase in unexplained child deaths since 2020, not 350% as originally thought, but actually 3,380%. This is 33 times the average. The speaker questions why this alarming statistic is being overlooked by medical professionals and the government. They aim to provide answers based on science, not speculation or rumors.

Speaker 0 argues that to determine whether smoking causes lung cancer, you must compare smokers to non-smokers. They recount a sequence of flawed study designs that would falsely conclude no link: comparing two smokers with different consumption levels and finding the same cancer rates; comparing different cigarette brands among smokers and again finding no difference; comparing people in different towns who all smoke and finding no difference. The point is that all these comparisons fail because they do not include a non-smoker control group; thus they cannot establish causation. They then contrast this with vaccine studies, asserting that studies claiming vaccines don’t cause chronic diseases or autism do not compare vaccinated to unvaccinated children. Instead, such studies compare vaccinated children to other vaccinated children, with variations in vaccines received (e.g., MMR, DTaP, multiple vaccines in one visit) and with differing aluminum exposures (e.g., four milligrams vs two milligrams). They emphasize that these studies never examine the actual outcome of interest by comparing vaccinated against unvaccinated children. The speaker maintains that this flaw in vaccine studies mirrors the earlier tobacco example. The essential argument is that the only way to determine causation is to compare the exposure group (vaccinated children) to an appropriate control group (unvaccinated children). They reference the Henry Ford trial as an example of an unvaccinated-versus-vaccinated comparison, but note that no one has published or accessible data from it. They call for someone brave enough to conduct and publish a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study to settle the issue. Finally, they challenge proponents of vaccination to conduct such a study to prove their position, insisting that if vaccines are truly safe and non-causal for chronic diseases or autism, the study should be done and the data published to demonstrate that the claim is correct. The overall message is a insistence on direct, unambiguous vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated comparisons to establish causality, highlighting perceived gaps in current vaccine research and urging transparent data publication.

The speaker presents a resolution regarding the alarming number of excess deaths in the country. They share data showing 262,000 deaths in 2021 and 67,000 deaths in 2022, all of which are unexplained. The committee agrees to conduct an investigation into this issue, specifically focusing on the 213,984 excess deaths. The motion is approved, and they move on to the next item on the agenda.

The speaker asks if there has been a study comparing the health outcomes of children following the CDC vaccination schedule and those who are unvaccinated. The other speaker says they are not aware of such a study and suggests it may be considered bad malpractice not to vaccinate a child. They discuss the possibility of a retrospective study using the Vaccine Safety Datalink, but note the need to control for confounders. The speaker presents an exhibit showing higher rates of health conditions in vaccinated children and suggests the need for larger studies to confirm or refute these findings. The other speaker agrees.

We analyzed all patients in my practice, no cherry-picking. Stratified by vaccines, 500 had 0, 3,700+ had some. Results showed more vaccines correlated with worse outcomes: infections, ADD, ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies, anemia. Data is powerful. Access to this info would have changed my choices for my daughter. Every parent deserves all information for informed decisions. Translation: We examined all patients in the practice without bias. Results showed a correlation between more vaccines and negative outcomes. Access to this data would have influenced my decisions for my daughter. All parents should have access to complete information for informed choices.

The speaker believes someone is serious about MAHA and concerned that vaccines cause autism, a claim he previously made but then stopped. Robert Kennedy also believes this and commissioned a study of existing data, specifically US government datasets like CMS, Medicare, and Medicaid. The study aims to detect a connection between the expansion of the vaccine schedule and the rise in autism. While a connection cannot be definitively stated, it seems likely to the speaker, and the president is reportedly concerned about it.

A person shares their findings on deaths related to COVID-19 vaccines in Massachusetts. They obtained 500,000 unredacted death certificates and found a 7-year-old girl who died from complications of COVID-19. They also mention another girl who died from a stroke after receiving the vaccine. The person claims that the vaccine caused these deaths, but the CDC did not code it as the cause. They mention several other cases of strokes and deaths related to the vaccine. They conclude by stating that over 4,000 people in Massachusetts have died from the vaccine.

The speaker discusses a set of 36 documents that are almost entirely redacted (blackened), described as “nori-bento” documents, and notes that 80% of the content is blacked out. The documents were received by a family member, specifically the widow of a man who was a former cram school teacher, living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, in her 40s. She explains that her husband died at home, and police prevented an autopsy; she wanted to know the cause of death and sought the autopsy results from the evidence. The narrative then presents a specific case: a 42-year-old man died six days after vaccination. He received the first vaccine dose on October 15, 2021, which was Pfizer. After the shot, he developed side effects: arm pain, fever, with the fever peaking at 38.5 degrees Celsius for about three days. The wife confirmed the fever lasted for three days, but she notes that he continued to go to work and did not typically discuss such symptoms. Six days after vaccination, around 2:30 a.m., the wife heard noises on the first floor and went down to find her husband collapsed. He was spitting white foam from his mouth and also bleeding; she recalls he was experiencing difficulty breathing. He subsequently suffered cardiopulmonary arrest and died. Regarding the cause of death, the doctors stated that the exact cause is unclear. They said, “this may or may not be the vaccine’s fault,” but there is no conclusive evidence that it was the vaccine. A physician described the death as related to an “acute circulatory system disease,” and there was discussion among multiple doctors who identified potential conditions such as heart attack, coronary issues, or other acute circulatory problems, but no definitive determination could be made from the available materials. The documents show that the police and investigators offered opinions that included statements like “rapid circulatory system disease inferred opinion.” The widow wanted autopsy results to clarify the cause, but the police or authorities did not provide a clear, accessible explanation in these redacted documents. There are other referenced cases where families argued that autopsies would have clarified the cause of death, and the narrator notes that some families regret not having autopsies performed. The speaker underscores that the majority of the 36 documents are redacted, with only a portion visible. The conclusion stated in the material is that the cause of death was inferred as an acute circulatory system disease, yet the detailed sequence of events leading to that conclusion remains obscured by redactions. The widow expresses ongoing grief and a wish for more complete, transparent autopsy information to understand why her husband died after vaccination. The material also hints at broader concerns about whether autopsies are being pursued aggressively enough in such cases.

The speaker discusses signals of transgenerational harm, clarifying they are not referring to transgender issues but harms that span generations. They cite CDC data to support a claim that, beginning right after mass vaccination of childbearing-age women in early 2021, there is a statistically significant inflection point in infant mortality. They state that infant mortality rates had been steadily decreasing for thirty years, but in 2021, after mass vaccination, the rate “shoots right up,” and it “hasn't gone down since.” As of 2025, they assert, babies are dying at seventy-seven percent excess, with Mississippi reportedly declaring a state of emergency over the situation. The speaker further claims that mothers are not taking the shots anymore. They suggest that some of the genetic material from the vaccination appears to integrate into the body and may be passed on, describing it as a legacy effect. They emphasize that most people took the shots in 2021, and express concern that there could be effects through the generations as a result.

The speaker presents a resolution regarding the alarming number of excess deaths in the country. They mention that there were 262,000 deaths in 2021 and 67,000 deaths in 2022, all of which are unexplained. The committee agrees to conduct an investigation on this issue, specifically focusing on the 213,984 excess deaths. The motion is approved, and they move on to the next item on the agenda.

We submitted a vaccine injury paper to The Lancet on COVID vaccine-related sudden deaths. The paper, co-authored by Dr. Peter McCullough, is the largest autopsy series in the world with 325 cases. 74% of sudden deaths were linked to the vaccine. Despite pressure, the paper passed peer review and will be published. More evidence is emerging on the harm of COVID vaccines, urging politicians to act preemptively.

Kendall asks for an explanation of the process by which the MMR vaccine causes autism, referencing the movie Vaxxed. Speaker 2 responds that they are currently researching those questions, as parents and physicians have reported children developing autism immediately after the MMR vaccine. The speaker claims studies that should have been done long ago were not. Instead, the speaker alleges that captured researchers at the CDC, mainly people who work for the pharmaceutical industry, produced bad epidemiological studies. The speaker asserts that these studies deliberately avoided comparing health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups. Speaker 0 states that this is one of the things they are studying now with gold standard science. Speaker 2 confirms they are doing gold standard science, which includes replication. They are allocating about 20% of their budget to replicating studies. Speaker 0 explains replication as an independent group repeating a study with the same parameters and data sets to achieve the same result. Speaker 2 agrees.

It is claimed that autopsies should be performed on everyone who dies after receiving a vaccine. It is alleged that there is a refusal to perform autopsies. It is argued that without autopsies, it is impossible to determine the specific cause of death. It is claimed that autopsies used to be commonly performed on most people who died.

Speaker 0 presents Connecticut memoranda series, volume one, describing a notice sent to Connecticut state officials (Attorney General and others) by certified mail and hand delivery through the governor’s office and Department of Public Health channels. The notice centers on acute renal failure (AKI) and argues it aligns with hospital homicide concerns. The speaker says the cover letter urges officials to seek personal legal counsel because if the state attorney represents the state, a conflict arises when citizens are harmed by state officials. The document allegedly provides detailed factual information drawn from official Connecticut records, intended to undermine any future “ignorance of fact” defense and to show that thousands have died from AKI and related conditions. Key claims and content: - The memorandum warns that described AKI deaths and related pulmonary embolism and thrombocytopenia are occurring in hospitals, and officials have a duty to act; failure to act after being informed could render officials criminally liable. The notice asserts sovereign and qualified immunity do not apply to criminal acts. - It asserts there are no statutes of limitations for most homicide crimes, and that inaction in the face of an imminent danger constitutes a legal duty to act. An inaction with knowledge of harm is framed as a criminal act. - Named recipients copied on the notice include Ned Lamont (Governor), Susan Bysiewicz (Lieutenant Governor), Eric Russell (State Treasurer), Sean Scanlon (Comptroller), William Tong (Attorney General), Manisha Juthani (Commissioner, Department of Public Health), A Orifice (Chief of Staff, DPH), and H Sultan (Special Counsel, DPH). The speaker claims these packages were signed for. - The memorandum is titled: “Memorandum notice of required action to thwart hospital homicides and acute renal failure deaths that are currently occurring and were occurring for the last three years, three and a half. Evidence compels immediate investigation and correction of injurious federal and state health protocols and mandates.” It cites a death-records study and a climate-related health data study obtained with approval to examine regional effects of temperature and humidity on heart disease. - It describes a data-driven investigation process with collaborators, including using discrete cosine transforms and discrete Fourier transforms to analyze signal-to-noise ratios in death data to determine seasonality and age-related patterns. The speaker reports that AKI deaths in CT rose substantially in 2020–2022, and notes a divergence from COVID death trends (AKI rising as COVID declines). - The speaker presents comparative state tallies for excess AKI deaths since 2015: Connecticut 1,721; Massachusetts 3,493; Minnesota 2,412. They claim thousands of AKI deaths across states, with CT showing a large increase in 2022 (and 2023) and assert that AKI was not adequately addressed by public health authorities. - The speaker discusses a pattern showing AKI deaths rising after December 2020, with a December 2020 inflection coinciding with a program (NCTAP). They claim hospital protocols and NIH COVID-19 treatments (remdesivir, baricitinib, ventilators) may have contributed to AKI and multi-organ failure, describing a two-signal theory: one signal linked to hospital protocols and the other to gene-based vaccines. - Graphs are described showing AKI versus COVID trends, with AKI not consistently correlated with COVID, and an observed spike in AKI deaths in CT beginning in 2020, peaking in 2022. The speaker notes a reduction in the proportion of AKI deaths that also test positive for COVID after March 2022, while AKI deaths continue to rise, suggesting a vaccine-related signal. - The speaker cites NIH COVID-19 treatment guidelines (final update dated 02/29/2024) and notes a planned website shutdown (08/16/2024), arguing a lack of updated protocols. They allege data manipulation or suppression by public health authorities. - In the recommended actions, the speaker proposes an investigation plan: verify CT data, investigate younger age groups first (examples: 94 deaths, ages 25–44; 184 deaths, ages 45–54 in CT 2020–2023), obtain entire hospital records (without notice) including vaccination status and treatment timelines, determine whether vaccination influenced treatment pathways, interview families, review DNR decisions, and publish results so the public can decide on consent to vaccines and NIH protocols. - The conclusion asserts an AKI epidemic in Connecticut that allegedly claims more life years than COVID and rivals other major past diseases in impact. It states there is no statute of limitations for murder, and that qualified and sovereign immunities do not shield officials from criminal charges. It calls for immediate investigation and potential prosecution of officials who knowingly refuse to investigate AKI deaths tied to NIH/CDC/FD&C protocols, framing this as a public health and civil liberty issue. The speaker closes by inviting questions and urging action to ensure accountability, expressing a desire to be involved in cleaning up public health governance.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

The speaker states they searched for years for a pre-licensing safety trial of the 72 vaccine doses effectively mandated for American children. They claim that every other medication requires a safety trial comparing health outcomes in a placebo group versus a vaccine group before FDA licensing. The speaker assumed this was also done for vaccines. They state they found out that vaccines were exempt from this requirement.

Researchers monitoring babies noticed alarms going off after vaccinations, specifically with the DPT vaccine. They found a pattern: within 48 hours post-vaccination, every child experienced respiratory issues and was more likely to stop breathing. Data analysis revealed recurring spikes in these episodes, not only within the initial 48 hours but also at five to seven days and again at sixteen days following vaccination. This data indicates that respiratory issues following vaccination are not limited to the first 48 hours, as is commonly believed.

Jennifer, a former police officer, shares her experience investigating child deaths attributed to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). She reveals that she noticed a pattern where many SIDS cases occurred within hours to a week after immunizations, particularly at the 6-month mark. Jennifer also highlights that medical examiners often left out the information about recent vaccinations on the death reports. This led her to question the lack of liability for vaccine manufacturers and sparked her journey into investigating vaccines. Ultimately, Jennifer and her husband decided not to vaccinate their own children. Due to potential repercussions, Jennifer refrains from disclosing her full name and agency.

Recently, a disabled veteran conducted a search in an obituary database and found a significant increase in the number of obituaries using the words "sudden" and "unexpected" in 2021 and 2022 compared to previous years. This data suggests that there may be a connection between these deaths and the vaccine. It's not just bodybuilders who have been affected, but also many young people.

Speaker 0 asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The speaker claims that, over the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, identifying hundreds of infants and toddlers who died after these shots, often from SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker states that most of these deaths occurred within about two weeks after the shot, with forty percent dying within one week. The deaths are described as temporally linked to the vaccination, with the majority of fatalities occurring at ages one to one and a half, which the speaker notes as the time they receive the MMR shots. The speaker claims that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The overall claim is that these shots are killing the babies in their sleep, described as absolutely disturbing and as part of a broader study. The speaker concludes that the shots are deadly and that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore; if parents still want them, they should be split up rather than administered as a combined dose, labeling the current approach as “the full load of garbage.”