reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Illegal aliens released by the Biden administration should start packing. Despite claims of visiting the border, the situation is misrepresented. Mass deportation is not inherently racist; it should target illegal immigrants, and families can be deported together. The idea of a border crisis is fabricated, driven by the president's vanity project. Criminal cartels are responsible for significant fentanyl trafficking, causing more American deaths than terrorist organizations. There's a notable increase in sex trafficking and arrests of terrorists at the border. The focus should not be on building a wall, as it won't solve the underlying issues. The president's approach is seen as a vanity project, and there's a commitment to addressing these challenges effectively.

All Americans are concerned about the high number of illegal immigrants entering the country. These individuals often take jobs that could be filled by citizens or legal immigrants and place a burden on public services. Our administration is taking strong action to secure the borders by hiring more border guards, increasing deportations of criminal aliens, and cracking down on illegal hiring practices. We aim to expedite the deportation process for illegal aliens arrested for crimes and improve identification of illegal workers, as recommended by the commission led by former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan. While we value our immigrant heritage, it is essential to uphold our immigration laws and prevent their abuse.

If you're a criminal, you'll be deported, and if you enter the U.S. illegally, your chances of getting caught just went up. According to Speaker 1, these actions are lawful and have been taken by both Republican and Democratic presidents for the past half century. Speaker 0 claims the media portrays Trump negatively for deporting illegal alien criminals, while Obama, Bill Clinton, and other Democrats were on board with this for years. Speaker 2 states their administration has moved aggressively to secure the borders by hiring a record number of new border guards, deporting twice as many criminal aliens, cracking down on illegal hiring, and barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. Speaker 3 says using phrases like "undocumented workers" conveys that the government is not serious about combating illegal immigration. Speaker 1 says we cannot allow people to pour into The United States undetected, undocumented, and unchecked. Speaker 2 says they will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes and to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace. Speaker 0 claims Obama deported 5,300,000 people, and Bill Clinton deported 12,300,000, questioning why there is a sudden change of heart now.

Speaker contends that current policy endangers public safety and that enforcement priorities are misaligned. The remarks center on immigration enforcement and its perceived consequences for communities. The speaker asserts: 'What ICE is doing is not making us safe.' They add: 'The Trump administration is treating immigrants generally, undocumented immigrants specifically as criminals.' They conclude with: 'But I remind people, being an undocumented immigrant is not a crime.' The statements underscore a distinction between immigration status and criminality, and frame immigration policy as a safety issue rather than a question of criminality. Overall, the message challenges conflating undocumented status with criminal intent and calls for a reevaluation of enforcement approaches.

I believe that those who pose a threat, like rapists and human traffickers, should be deported. As a Latina whose family immigrated legally, I support the removal of individuals who endanger our communities. I want a safe environment for everyone, regardless of background. It's essential for artists and musicians to feel secure, allowing us to express ourselves freely. The focus should be on deporting those who truly threaten our safety.

The speaker states the budget will focus on speeding up the deportation of illegal aliens arrested for crimes. They reference Senator Biden's stance that cities should not ignore federal law. The speaker believes in tough conditions, urging undocumented people to come out of the shadows, and supports deporting those who have committed crimes, no questions asked. Undocumented workers broke immigration laws and must be held accountable, especially those who may be dangerous.

We prioritize securing the border to protect our nation. Undocumented individuals should be treated with respect. They have helped build our country.

The speaker presents a hypothetical scenario of an illegal gang member arriving at the U.S. Southwest border during the Biden-Harris era in 2023. He traveled with assistance from taxpayer-funded NGOs and, after being encountered, was released into the interior with a notice to appear in immigration court and a work permit. The individual files a bare-bones asylum application that is described as frivolous. Because the immigration court backlog is nearly 4,000,000 cases, the case would take years to adjudicate. In the meantime, the person would relocate to a major city, receive taxpayer-funded benefits, potentially commit crimes, be protected by sanctuary city leadership, and be defended by Democrats who allegedly say immigration laws are too harsh. The asylum claim would be denied by an immigration judge years later, followed by appeals to the Board of Immigration Appeals, then to a federal court of appeals, all taking months or years and expending extensive federal resources. The speaker claims this illustrates a broader pattern in what he calls “open borders” policies and a system that wastes federal resources on frivolous claims. The speaker introduces the bill: the Expedited Removal of Criminal Aliens Act. It aims to prevent criminal aliens from exploiting the asylum system and to ensure quicker deportation. It states that foreign nationals convicted of certain crimes are ineligible for immigration relief, must be detained, and deported quickly. The speaker notes that decades of immigration law already authorize a more efficient process to remove certain dangerous criminal aliens through administrative or expedited removal, particularly for aggravated felons, with due process upheld in federal appellate courts. The bill would expand categories of criminal aliens who may be placed in removal proceedings when in criminal custody and authorize the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to place additional criminals in expedited removal proceedings. It would allow DHS to fast-track deportation for aliens who are not lawful permanent residents and who are part of a criminal gang, transnational criminal organization, or foreign terrorist organization, or who have been convicted of dangerous crimes. The speaker then lists the specific crimes that would trigger eligibility under the bill: any felony; any misdemeanor against a member of a vulnerable group; assault on a law enforcement officer; sexual offenses; domestic violence; stalking; crimes against children; sex trafficking of a minor or sexual abuse of a minor; activities involving exploitation of minors or violations of protective orders. The “vulnerable group” includes children under 16, pregnant women, individuals with severe physical or mental disabilities, and seniors over 65. The speaker cites polling: 78% of Americans support deporting immigrants who are here illegally and have committed crimes, including nearly 70% of Democrats; 56% support deporting all illegal immigrants, with 36% of Democrats agreeing. He contrasts these views with what he claims were Democratic actions during the previous administration: high border encounters, 8,000,000 illegal entries (including 2,000,000 gotaways), hundreds on the terrorist watch list encountered and released, and a record immigration court backlog. He accuses Democrats of inaction on border security and comprehensive immigration reform, citing several bills the House allegedly passed or votes by Democrats against, including bills on border security, identity theft, driving-while-illegal offenses, and increasing penalties for felons, as well as naming acts after victims of crimes committed by illegal aliens. He concludes by arguing that the American people rejected the Democratic approach and gave Congress a mandate to secure the border and reform the immigration system, and asserts that the expedited removal bill moves toward that goal.

Thank you, Mister Chair. As someone who practices criminal law in Texas and Arkansas, I want to emphasize that existing laws target violent criminals, regardless of administration. Federal law aims for safety, and we should focus on real issues like fentanyl, which I have addressed through multiple bills. Let's clarify some misconceptions: 1. Immigrants commit more crimes than U.S. citizens? Rhetoric. 2. Immigrants live off the government? Rhetoric. 3. Immigrants only enter at the southern border? Rhetoric. It's crucial to recognize that immigrants contribute positively to our communities. Notably, mass shootings in Buffalo and Charleston were committed by U.S. citizens, not immigrants. The El Paso shooting also targeted immigrants, perpetrated by white supremacists, who accounted for over 80% of extremism-related murders in 2022.

Immigrants commit crimes at a lower rate than natural-born citizens. Statistically, a town or neighborhood is safer with immigrants because they commit violent crimes less often than people born in the United States. The speaker objects to the bill, stating it feeds a false narrative that the country should fear families coming to the United States fleeing economic desperation, violence, terror, or torture in search of a better life.

Ninety percent of people coming into the country are trying to do the right thing. Currently, some people who shouldn't be are being removed from the country, including those with visas. The goal is to keep out people who are doing bad things. Immigrants are reportedly much less likely to commit crimes than American-born citizens.

Being undocumented is not a crime. We need to change the narrative and stop labeling undocumented immigrants as criminals. Let's treat them with respect and not as lawbreakers when they cross the border.

A recent ABC News poll shows a strong majority of Americans support deporting all immigrants here illegally, with figures around 55% to 64% across various polls. This reflects a significant shift in public sentiment since 2015, when only 42% supported deportation. By the end of last year, that number rose to 56%, indicating a more hawkish stance on immigration. Additionally, 55% of respondents want to decrease overall immigration levels, the highest since post-9/11, marking a 14-point increase from 2023 and a 17-point rise since 2016. This trend suggests growing support for stricter immigration policies, giving political figures like Donald Trump leverage with the American public.

We need to establish strict conditions for immigration. Those who have committed crimes should be deported without exception. For law-abiding individuals, we should outline specific requirements for them to stay. These include paying a significant fine for their illegal entry, settling any back taxes owed, making an effort to learn English, and waiting their turn in the immigration process.

President Trump's deportation of migrants has sparked controversy, with some arguing it's inhumane while others, particularly Trump supporters, express concerns about immigrant crime. Despite perceptions, data from Texas suggests illegal immigrants commit fewer crimes than native-born Americans. While illegal immigrants don't qualify for most welfare benefits, their children attend public schools and hospitals often treat them, leading to resentment among some who feel their tax dollars are being misspent. Some propose restricting "goodies" rather than immigration itself, arguing immigrants benefit America. Immigrants contribute to the economy by filling essential jobs and paying taxes, often more than they receive in benefits. They also create jobs, with immigrants founding half of successful Silicon Valley startups. Legal immigration is complex, pushing some to enter illegally. A proposal suggests allowing entry to those with job offers, no criminal record, and no infectious diseases. Concerns about cultural changes and assimilation exist, but history shows immigrants eventually assimilate. Some worry about immigrants bringing in unwanted ideas, but others argue that promoting American values will encourage assimilation.

It's common sense that we have many migrants here illegally who have committed crimes. It's hard to understand why anyone would defend allowing them to stay in the country. If you're here illegally and committing crimes, it's not controversial to say they should go. This issue was significant in the election. In the Senate, there are 47 members, and if we can't secure at least 7 votes, that's part of the reason for our loss. It's crucial to recognize the importance of addressing this issue effectively.

President Trump's deportation of migrants has sparked controversy, with some citing inhumane treatment while others express anger over immigrant crime. Despite perceptions, data from Texas indicates illegal immigrants commit fewer crimes than native-born Americans. Concerns about welfare burdens are also raised, though illegal immigrants are ineligible for most benefits. Economically, immigrants contribute through labor and taxes, often paying more than they receive. While some Americans may lose jobs, studies suggest immigrants create more jobs overall, founding successful startups and driving innovation. Legal immigration is seen as overly complex, pushing some to enter illegally. Concerns about cultural assimilation and the introduction of unwelcome ideas exist, but historical trends show immigrants typically assimilate within a few generations. Some argue that requiring immigrants to work, learn English, and assimilate would attract the best candidates. It's suggested that promoting American values like individual rights and capitalism would facilitate assimilation.

If you're a criminal, you'll be deported, and if you enter the U.S. illegally, your chances of getting caught just went up. According to Speaker 1, these actions are lawful and have been taken by both Republican and Democratic presidents for the past half century. Speaker 0 claims the media portrays Trump negatively for deporting illegal alien criminals, while Obama, Bill Clinton, and other Democrats were previously on board with this. Speaker 2 states their administration has moved aggressively to secure the borders by hiring more border guards, deporting twice as many criminal aliens, cracking down on illegal hiring, and barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. Speaker 3 says using phrases like "undocumented workers" conveys that the government isn't serious about combating illegal immigration. Speaker 1 says we cannot allow people to pour into The United States undetected, undocumented, and unchecked. Speaker 2 says they will try to speed the deportation of illegal aliens arrested for crimes and better identify illegal aliens in the workplace. Speaker 0 claims Obama deported 5,300,000 people, and Bill Clinton deported 12,300,000, questioning why there is a sudden change of heart now.

The Biden-Harris administration has acknowledged releasing thousands of illegal immigrants with violent crime convictions. This includes murderers and human traffickers. Despite this, it's stated that an undocumented immigrant is not inherently a criminal. President Trump emphasizes the need to deport these individuals, secure the border, and restore safety to our streets. He stands by his commitment to these actions.

A recent ABC News poll shows a strong consensus among Americans for deporting all undocumented immigrants, with results from various polls indicating around 55-64% support. This marks a significant increase in hawkish sentiments towards immigration since 2015, when support was only 36%. The latest figures suggest a 20-point rise since Trump’s initial presidency. Additionally, 55% of respondents want to decrease overall immigration levels, the highest since post-9/11, reflecting a 14-point increase from 2023 and a 17-point rise since 2016. Overall, public opinion has shifted towards a more stringent stance on immigration and deportation.

If someone crosses the border illegally, I believe it should not be a criminal offense with jail time. It should be treated as a civil enforcement issue instead.

There is fear mongering around immigration, but polls show Americans still support it. People want a system that works for safety. Media coverage can fuel fear with different perspectives. Economic insecurity plays a role in people's attitudes.

Many Americans are concerned about the impact of deporting illegal immigrants on food prices and safety. However, only 1% of undocumented workers are in agriculture, with most residing in major cities. The influx of illegal immigrants from countries like Venezuela and Haiti is not contributing to farm work but rather relying on welfare in urban areas. President Trump supports a guest worker program for farmers and emphasizes the need for automation in agriculture. The administration will enforce immigration laws strictly, ensuring that illegal immigrants who pose a threat to public safety are removed. The focus will be on addressing transnational threats effectively.

We will not engage in efforts that harm our communities. Mass deportations, as proposed by the president-elect, will misallocate essential resources. It's crucial for everyone to educate themselves on this issue. Refer to Title 8, United States Code 1324, which outlines the legal implications of harboring or concealing an illegal alien; it is a felony. Understanding this statute is vital to avoid crossing legal boundaries.

It's common sense that we have many migrants here illegally who have committed crimes. It's hard to understand why anyone would defend allowing them to stay in the country. If someone is here illegally and engages in criminal activity, they should be removed. This issue was significant in the recent election. In the Senate, with 47 members, if we can't secure at least 7 votes on this matter, it reflects why we lost. This is one of the reasons for our defeat. Brett, consider that perspective; it's a crucial point being made.