reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A study in Cleveland on 51,000 healthcare workers showed a direct correlation between COVID vaccinations and infection rates. Unvaccinated individuals had lower infection rates compared to those with one, two, three doses, or a bivalent booster. The study found that the more shots received, the higher the likelihood of getting and spreading COVID.

Speaker 0/J: The discussion centers on a study with dramatic implications, including claims that publishing such data could be career-ending, and questions about why the data would be so catastrophic. Speaker 2: The study involved eighteen thousand four hundred sixty eight subjects, of which one thousand nine hundred fifty seven were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis—specifically four point two nine times in the adjusted analysis—and they note there are studies showing a range from three point two six to five point six five. Speaker 1: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases. Speaker 2: Atopic diseases are described as a subset of allergic diseases. Speaker 1: They found an almost six times risk for autoimmune disease. Speaker 3: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mention there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and their data showed for autoimmunity a six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: This is presented as staggering because autoimmune disorders represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders are also discussed. Speaker 0: What kind numbers we talked about? Do you remember? Speaker 1: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Speaker 2: They state the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning, and so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 0: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities, four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, Speaker 3: Three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same patterns as with allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections. Speaker 2: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The mathematical formulas require non-zero counts in both groups to compare risk. Speaker 1: For example, there were two sixty two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD. Speaker 3: These results are described as mind boggling. Conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids: zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.

The largest COVID study found a link between the vaccine and heart/brain disorders. Data from 100 million people in 8 countries showed slight increases in conditions like myocarditis and Guillain Barre syndrome. The study does not prove the vaccine caused these issues. Despite concerns, experts say the vaccine's benefits outweigh the risks. People like Elizabeth Foster question the vaccine's impact on their health. It's important to consult with a doctor before deciding to get vaccinated.

A study from Cleveland on 51,000 healthcare workers showed a direct correlation between COVID vaccinations and infection rates. Unvaccinated individuals had the lowest COVID rates, while those with more doses had higher rates. The bivalent booster recipients had the highest infection rates. The study emphasized the importance of vaccination in preventing the spread of COVID.

A new study published in Frontiers in Medicine reveals that COVID-19 vaccination may double the risk of post-COVID death after one year. The research analyzed over 15,000 severe acute respiratory syndrome cases in Brazil from 2020 to 2023, finding that while vaccination initially reduced mortality risk, this effect reversed long-term. The study recorded 5,157 deaths, with higher risks among older adults and those with less education. The authors suggest that the initial protective effect could be linked to healthier behaviors among vaccinated individuals, while long-term risks may arise from vaccine-related adverse effects. The findings call for further investigation into these trends, emphasizing the need for reevaluation of vaccination policies. The discussion also highlights the broader implications for public health and the urgent need for accountability regarding vaccine safety.

Speaker 0 expresses that publishing the material would effectively end his career. Speaker 1 questions what in the data could make the outcomes catastrophic for his career. Speaker 2 notes the study as a “bombshell.” The study included 18,468 subjects, of whom 1,957 were fully unvaccinated. When comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated groups, there was an increased risk of several chronic health conditions in the vaccinated group. Specifically, the vaccinated were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis, with an adjusted figure of 4.29 times (range 3.26 to 5.65 across analyses). Speaker 4 adds that the study also found a threefold increase in atopic diseases, which are a subset of allergic diseases. The researchers reported almost a sixfold risk for autoimmune disease, listing autoimmune conditions such as thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), multiple sclerosis, and Guillain–Barré syndrome. They note there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and the data showed a sixfold increase in autoimmunity among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3 highlights neurodevelopmental disorders, noting a five-and-a-half times increased risk. The discussion emphasizes that the immune system is intimately connected with brain development and functioning, suggesting that when the immune system is triggered by illness or vaccination, neuropsychiatric symptoms may arise due to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2 reports two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities and four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated, along with a threefold rate of developmental delay. The data also show, consistent with allergy and autoimmunity findings, six times more acute and chronic ear infections in the vaccinated group. Speaker 3 notes that in several health conditions, analysis could not be performed because there were none in the unvaccinated group, and the methods required nonzero counts in both groups. For example, there were two hundred sixty-two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group, while the unvaccinated group had zero cases of ADHD. The same pattern is described for other conditions: zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, ticks, and other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated group.

Speaker 0: Take the shot and protect yourself and the people around you. We all feel a chill when we hear that. Mrs. van der Hof from the RIVM, you’ve researched the effects of vaccination. If you look under the line, has it had any usefulness? Speaker 1: It has certainly been useful. In fact, from our research, but also from many other studies, people who were vaccinated had a lower chance of dying from COVID, and we see that effect with every shot that’s given. We also studied whether there is a higher chance of dying from diseases other than COVID shortly after vaccination, to see whether there is vaccine harm, and we do not find that either, which is also in line with what is found internationally. Speaker 0: Okay, because that is the story you hear at the dinner table. Earlier this week someone said, I see so many people dying, there must be something. Speaker 1: Yes. Well, there are certainly people who have died due to the vaccination. We cannot deny that. That has been investigated; we find that in the Netherlands through Lareb, and we find that internationally as well. You just have to weigh the very small chance that you become ill or die from a vaccination against the chance that you become very ill or die from COVID. And the balance tips toward vaccination. Speaker 0: Yes, vaccination protects more than it harms, you just said. Also, have you studied the chance of death due to vaccination? Speaker 1: Well, we looked at people who were vaccinated and whether within 2 months after vaccination they had an increased chance of dying from anything other than COVID. If there were an indication there, we would see it, and we absolutely do not find that. Speaker 0: No, that is simply not found. Okay. Mrs. Van der Broek, and the pandemic was a priority.

The UK Public Health England released data on illness rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. In people over 50, the rates of illness were higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group. This trend continued in the 50-60, 60-70 age groups as well. The data suggests that those who received two vaccine doses are more likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 than those who are unvaccinated. This difference may be due to immunosensescence, where the immune system becomes less effective with age. The data contradicts the notion that the pandemic is primarily affecting the unvaccinated.

We submitted a paper on COVID vaccine injuries to The Lancet, which was taken down due to pressure from the pharmaceutical industry. The paper has now passed peer review and will be published, showing that 74% of sudden deaths after vaccination were caused by the vaccine. More evidence is emerging daily on the harm of COVID vaccines, urging politicians to act preemptively.

Think about what we've done with autism. Right? There's a whole big push of finding answers for autism. The problem with autism. It's not a one answer. No, it's a myriad of answers. It's really risk factors. What are the risk factors that puts my kid at risk for autism? And the risk factors could be you gave your kid antibiotics, could be mom was drinking a lot of alcohol during pregnancy, could be mom was stressed during pregnancy, could be maybe something in the vaccine. Right? But you can't talk about that because that kills, that starts hesitancy, that creates a narrative change, but we have to talk about that. We have to look at all the risk factors so we could say, okay, antibiotics on their own is not going to create autism because you have seen kids that took antibiotics and didn't get autism. Vaccines on their own are not going to create autism because we've seen kids that were vaccinated and are fine and never got autism. However, what are the cumulative risk factors?

A week in Greene County indicates vaccine hesitancy is more complex than surveys suggest, with politics not being the primary driver. Fear is the most common reason, specifically regarding the speed of development and unknown long-term side effects. Decisions are also influenced by beliefs about bodily autonomy, science, authority, and a regional self-image of independence. There are three groups of unvaccinated individuals that must be approached differently. One group is anti-vaxx and anti-science, and may not be vaccinating their children. This group should not be the primary target.

In the last 5 years, studies have shown that vaccine refusers, specifically those who refuse vaccines without hesitation, can be a challenge to convince. One potential solution suggested is to focus on the diverse population in the United States, particularly in cities like New York, where there are 7 Asian languages spoken. By targeting and engaging with this diverse community, efforts can be made to address vaccine hesitancy and encourage more people to accept vaccines.

We encourage vaccination without making it mandatory. Those unvaccinated may face restrictions like not being able to travel, work in public service, or access non-essential services. A controversial study by David Fisman claimed unvaccinated individuals increase the risk for vaccinated people, but critics argue it was based on flawed data. The government used this study to justify mandates, sparking debate. The opposition questions the lack of scientific evidence behind certain policies. Ultimately, individuals have a choice to get vaccinated, but there may be consequences for opting out without a valid medical reason.

The delta variant of COVID-19 is causing a rise in hospitalizations among unvaccinated Albertans. Vaccines provide excellent protection against infection and severe disease, even with the delta variant. We appreciate the 2.9 million Albertans who have been vaccinated. However, due to a large number of unvaccinated individuals, the delta variant is spreading widely and causing more severe outcomes in unvaccinated adults. Since July 1st, unvaccinated people aged 20-59 have a 50-60 times higher risk of hospitalization compared to those who are vaccinated. It is crucial to get vaccinated.

We submitted a vaccine injury paper to The Lancet about COVID-19 vaccine-related sudden deaths. The paper was taken down due to pressure from the pharmaceutical industry but has now passed peer review and will be published. It found that 74% of sudden deaths were caused by the vaccine. More evidence is emerging about the harm of COVID-19 vaccines, and politicians should act before it's too late.

In a recent study, researchers examined autopsy reports of deaths that appeared to be linked to the COVID-19 vaccine. Using a rigorous analysis, they found that 73.9% of the cases showed that the vaccine either directly caused or significantly contributed to the deaths. Most of these deaths occurred within a week or two after receiving the last vaccine dose, with cardiovascular issues being the main cause. The study was conducted by a team of doctors and experts in pathology, who reviewed 44 papers and 325 autopsies.

Speaker 0 discusses the idea that a new consensus about serious side effects from COVID vaccines is causing people, including medical experts, to reexamine other vaccines given in childhood. He references an anonymous Substack author under the name the Midwestern doctor, who provides a thoughtful assessment of widely accepted childhood vaccines. According to the Midwestern doctor, many vaccines have negligible or nonexistent benefits but have documented side effects. He cites MMR, DPT, flu, and tetanus vaccines as examples. The author argues that after bacterial childhood vaccinations were introduced, this approach led to the infection and other bacterial infections becoming more common and mutating into more dangerous strains that affected many people who were not previously susceptible, and created a variety of new side effects from the infections not seen before. He contends that the response to these infections worsening has been to develop new vaccines for them, which, in his view, has further accelerated this downward spiral and also generated big pharma profits. In conclusion, regarding COVID vaccines, the Midwestern doctor writes that “these recent publications and the data sets that Dowd's estimate Ed Dowd's estimate is based upon show clearly and unambiguously that the risk of the COVID vaccines greatly outweigh any possible benefit they might have.” Doctor Pierre Corre, who has gained prominence as a COVID vaccine critic, posted on X that the article calls him to rethink his acceptance of the manufacturer consensus about the childhood vaccine schedule. Corre is quoted as saying, “before COVID, I didn't think there were serious issues with the childhood vaccines, but now, like many, I've come to question that assumption.”

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 repeatedly describe the virus as actively targeting unvaccinated people. They state, “If you are unvaccinated and the virus comes into your community, the virus will hunt you out. The virus hunts down the unvaccinated,” and insist, “The virus will find the unvaccinated. That’s what they all say. And it’s a virus that will find you if you’re not vaccinated.” They emphasize that “the virus is literally finding unvaccinated people” and that “the virus will find you” if you remain unvaccinated, especially when you are in circulation. The speakers highlight the Delta variant as particularly dangerous, saying, “The Delta variant of COVID nineteen has the potential to spread through an unvaccinated community like wildfire,” and describing Delta as “so aggressive,” asserting that “If you are unvaccinated, it’s gonna find you,” and reiterating, “Delta is finding the unvaccinated. The Delta variant will find you. If you’re not vaccinated, it will find you.” They argue the risk is not confined to crowded urban areas but “tends to find places that are under vaccinated.” The virus, they say, “does not just move to city centers. It finds the unvaccinated wherever they are.” They illustrate this with a hypothetical: “you might live in the middle of the desert, but it can still find you.” The claim is that the virus “is looking for you” among those who are unvaccinated, specifically mentioning people who are either unvaccinated or “have only had one jab and are not fully protected.” They further state that “the virus does seem to be finding older people who have not received that third dose.” The overarching claim is that “we’ll ultimately find just about everybody,” underscoring that the danger persists across different demographics and vaccination statuses. They illustrate this with a concluding anecdote: “these three people, two of them weren’t vaccinated. One had just had the first dose. The virus was found.”

The speaker explains that the Pfizer shot is designed so that its messenger RNA enters cells and can be replicated indefinitely by ribosomes, so it “cannot get it out of your body,” and there is “no detoxing from it.” The speaker says that although the body can be detoxed or made healthier overall, it is not possible to eliminate the spike protein, antibodies to spike protein, or advocated monoclonal antibodies. The speaker claims that the presence of spike proteins “sensitize your dendritic cells and your b cells,” and that “those spikes are gonna be there probably forever.” A central claim is that messenger RNA “ablates, wipes out, destroys Toll like receptor three, seven, and eight.” The speaker describes Toll-like receptors as “God inside our body,” “radars” that constantly patrol to get rid of viruses, bacteria, and things that do not belong, and as the “innate, God given” immune system present from birth. The speaker asserts that destroying Toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8 makes people “more susceptible to getting COVID,” and claims this is why people “that get the shots suddenly are sick.” The speaker further says doctors “are illiterate and not reading” the mechanisms. The speaker adds that in hospital settings, people treated with remdesivir and placed on a ventilator have “greater than eighty percent mortality rate.” The speaker frames this as part of a known mechanism: spike proteins enter the nucleus of cells and “bind to our DNA.” The speaker states that any claim that the spike proteins do not irreversibly bind DNA is wrong, and says the binding “blocks the door,” converting the cell into an abnormal cell that “if that cell replicates, will turn into cancer.” The speaker also claims that spike binding prevents “our God given immune system repair enzymes” from repairing the damage, allowing cancer to form. The speaker links this to a “explosion of cancer in people that get these shots,” including people who were in remission and later experience cancer returning or worsening, and mentions endometrial cancer and “all kinds of blood cancers, lymphatic cancers, breast cancers.” The speaker refers to doctor Ryan Cole discussing this. The speaker also cites recent data, stating that a person “is injected” and is then “eight point one two times more likely to be infected with Omicron.” The speaker concludes by asserting that repeated shots further suppress the immune system: the more shots, the more “destroy your immune system” and the faster it happens. The speaker then claims that “German data” says that by the end of 2022, every fully vaccinated person over age 30 may have the equivalent of “full blown vaccine induced

We are vaccinating millions, and while there are reports of deaths following vaccinations, there is no evidence that the vaccine causes these deaths. Adverse reactions must be reported, but many go unreported, potentially skewing data. For instance, only 5% of adverse reactions may reach the monitoring database. There have been serious cases, including hospitalizations, that are not being documented properly. Despite the numbers, experts assert that the vaccine is safe and effective. It's crucial for the public to understand that while adverse events will occur, they are often coincidental. The vaccine remains vital for public health, and getting vaccinated is strongly encouraged.

Some studies suggest that people who refuse to get vaccinated may be responsible for 2 to 300,000 additional deaths in the country. Thank you to the team for their efforts in saving lives, despite facing attacks.

The CDC is focused on ensuring that all eligible Americans are vaccinated. They have conducted a study in 13 states, analyzing over 600,000 COVID-19 cases from April to mid-July. The study found that unvaccinated individuals were 4.5 times more likely to contract COVID-19 and over 10 times more likely to be hospitalized compared to vaccinated individuals. The CDC will continue to work with local communities and trusted messengers to increase vaccination rates. Vaccination is the key to turning the corner on the pandemic, protecting us from severe complications, and allowing safe, in-person learning for children.

In a study, it was found that the risk of contracting COVID-19 increased with the number of vaccine doses received. Compared to those who were not vaccinated, individuals who received one dose were 1.7 times more likely to test positive for COVID-19. The risk increased to 2.6 times for those who received two doses, 3.1 times for those with three doses, and 3.8 times for those with more than three doses. The study showed a clear correlation between the number of vaccines received and the risk of testing positive for COVID-19. The results were highly significant, with a P value of 0.001, indicating a 99% likelihood of being a genuine result.

Speaker 0 discusses this year's flu shot and mentions that flu season is longer than usual. He references headlines about flu vaccine links to higher infections, citing a Cleveland Clinic study involving their employees and the influenza vaccine during this respiratory viral season. In the study, 53,402 employees were observed; 43,857 (82.1%) had received the influenza vaccine by study end. Influenza occurred in 1,079 individuals (2.02%). The cumulative incidence of influenza was similar for vaccinated and unvaccinated groups early on, but over time the cumulative incidence increased more rapidly among the vaccinated. The study includes an adjusted analysis controlling for age, sex, clinical nursing job, employment location, and reports that the risk of influenza was significantly higher for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of -26.9%. In other words, the data suggested a 26.9% greater chance of contracting the flu or other respiratory virus for the vaccinated group. The conclusion presented is that influenza vaccination of working-age adults was associated with a higher risk of influenza during the 2024-2025 season, suggesting the vaccine did not have the intended protective effect. Speaker 1 adds commentary, noting that the Cleveland Clinic study admits they effectively coerced over 80% of their staff to get the flu shot, implying these individuals are not biased against the vaccine and would be expected to defend it. They argue this makes the bias the opposite of what some might assume and suggest that the study should prompt reconsideration of vaccination. Speaker 1 then pivots to an appeal: they encourage viewers to sign up for their email list at thehighwire.com or ICANN, promising to deliver the study and related evidence in their inbox. They urge viewers to take the Cleveland Clinic document to their doctor and ask, “Should I get this year's flu shot?” If the doctor says yes, Speaker 1 counsels firing the doctor and presenting the document as a reason, claiming doctors may be unaware of the study. They emphasize firing doctors who do not know the study and assert that this week they wish to see doctors fired across the country if they cannot defend the use of the vaccine in light of the study. Speaker 1 concludes with a personal admonition to avoid doctors who, in their view, are not making informed decisions about health and the future of children. Speaker 0 revisits the broader context, noting that a flu vaccine with low effectiveness is not surprising since strains are guessed before the season and production is ramped up accordingly. He references Canadian headlines about low or no protection this year, and remarks that negative efficacy, such as -26.9%, is particularly noteworthy.