reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker is discussing a person named Kent and trying to find information about him. They mention searching for his name online and asking if he has been in trouble before. They also mention not knowing his driver's license number and asking for his last name and birthday. They come across a Paris organization number that they are unfamiliar with and mention contacting the screening center. They find a phone number for border patrol and mention contacting the FBI. The speaker ends by saying they will call the FBI.

Speaker 0 gave the FBI a thumb drive containing 29 minutes of high-definition video showing two men attacking a building. As of this morning, neither man has been arrested. Speaker 0 states that despite going through over 725 indictments, none of their video or even a single still picture of either man has appeared on the Internet. The FBI is allegedly refusing to take Speaker 0's calls, return emails, or accept an offer to meet. Speaker 0 believes the FBI is hiding these men. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to inquire about the identities of these men. Speaker 0 confirms that Ben Grundler has all this information and that they have been in contact for over a year.

The speaker is asked about a claim made by Steven Nayeroff, who said that when he was arrested, the FBI demanded information from him about various people, including the speaker. The speaker admits to not knowing anything about it until it came out publicly. They mention that there were many names on the list, but the press only focused on a few. The speaker reiterates that they had no knowledge of the situation.

The speaker is discussing a person named Kent and trying to find information about him. They mention searching for his name online and asking if he has been in trouble before. They also mention not knowing his driver's license number and asking for his last name and birthday. They come across a Paris organization number that they have never seen before and mention contacting the screening center. They find a phone number for border patrol and mention contacting the FBI. The speaker ends by saying they will call the FBI and asking who is calling.

The speaker is discussing a person named Kent and trying to find information about him. They mention searching for his name online and asking if he has been in trouble before. They also mention not knowing his driver's license number and asking for his last name and birthday. They come across a Paris organization number that they are unfamiliar with and mention contacting the screening center. They find a phone number for border patrol and mention contacting the FBI. The speaker expresses surprise at the situation and mentions that they will make the necessary calls.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they gained any evidence after a certain point, to which Speaker 1 responds that they weren't collecting evidence. Speaker 0 then questions if they should be able to recall such information. Speaker 1 clarifies that they presented themselves as witnesses, not investigators, when they approached the FBI. Speaker 0 suggests that they made a complaint without evidence, and Speaker 1 disagrees, stating that they believed a crime had occurred in good faith. Speaker 0 interrupts and asks why they didn't talk to Ken Paxton, but Speaker 2 requests that Speaker 1 be allowed to finish answering. The transcript ends.

Two FBI agents visit a woman's home looking for Elise, who is not there. The woman, Elise's mother, provides contact information for Elise. The agents assure her that Elise is not in trouble and leave their office number. The woman is initially hesitant but eventually agrees to pass on the message to Elise. The agents introduce themselves as Ashley Roberts and Kathleen Brown before leaving.

Speaker 0: What happened today? Ambassador Bolton would happen, sir. What were you told by the FBI? Ambassador Bolton? What were they looking for?

The speaker is discussing a person named Kent and trying to find information about him. They mention searching for his name online and asking if he has been in trouble before. They also mention not knowing his driver's license number and asking for his last name and birthday. They come across a Paris organization number that they are unfamiliar with and mention contacting the screening center. They find a phone number for border patrol and mention contacting the FBI. The speaker ends by saying they will call the FBI.

In the dialogue, Speaker 0 discusses long-standing claims that information has been independently discovered, suppressed, and now appears unlikely to be suppressed this time. The speaker asserts that the person being spoken about is apparently in the clear and that various agencies are aware of them due to multiple protective and threatening interactions with different agency affiliations. The core message is that if the person had not yet been approached by a US government agent telling them to stop, they would be allowed to continue; in other words, agents are waiting and watching, with some implying that suppression may not occur this time. The speaker describes a sense that “SSP motherfuckers” are anxiously awaiting publication, wondering if Amy will publish soon because they have been influencing the situation for a long time. There is a perception that multiple parties on one side are asking why she isn’t stopping, recalling that they had warned her three years earlier that they would kill her if she continued. The speaker conveys two opposing, ongoing scenarios in their life: one where people urge them to proceed (“do it”), asserting they are the one who should publish; and another where multiple people warn that others will kill them if they do publish. Overall, the transcript portrays a tense, dual awareness of external pressure and threats related to publishing, with conflicting external signals from various actors about whether to proceed or face lethal consequences.

I'm John Gray from the FBI. Miss Anderson isn't here. I wanted to discuss the Baton Rouge case with her. Can I schedule a meeting with her?

The speaker questions the FBI's practice of tipping off the subject of a search warrant before it is executed. They inquire about the FBI's contact with the protective detail of individuals and the potential undermining of investigations. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of answers and accuses the FBI of a cover-up. Director Wray requests a 5-minute recess. The speaker acknowledges the frustration but explains that policies prevent discussing ongoing investigations. They mention that these policies were strengthened under the previous administration. The speaker concludes by stating that there is an obligation to call out corruption.

I'm John Gray from the FBI. Is Miss Anderson available? No, she's not. I wanted to discuss the Baton Rouge case with her. Can I schedule a meeting to come back and talk to her?

Speaker 0 is contacted by the FBI but refuses to turn off the camera. They are asked about someone they met online but refuse to speak on camera. Speaker 0 declines an interview and ends the conversation.

The speaker is discussing a person named Kent and trying to find information about him. They mention searching for his name online and asking if he has been in trouble before. They also mention not knowing his driver's license number and asking for his last name and birthday. They come across a Paris organization number and mention contacting the screening center. They find a phone number for border patrol and mention contacting the FBI. The speaker is unsure about who is calling but plans to call the FBI.

The speaker mentions having spoken with whistleblowers and an informant who provided valuable information. However, they express difficulty in locating the informant and hope that they are still available. The whistleblower is described as credible. When questioned about the informant's whereabouts, the speaker clarifies that they are hopeful of finding them. They explain that informants in the spy business tend to avoid being seen frequently or being in the public eye.

The speaker repeatedly questions why the FBI is always referenced for information. They press the other speaker, who claims to have communicated with the FBI, about details of an investigation. Despite being asked about shell casings and explosives, the speaker deflects, insisting on referring to the FBI for answers. The questioning becomes more intense, with accusations of withholding information and covering up. The speaker continues to evade direct answers, emphasizing the ongoing criminal investigation.

I'm looking for Vanessa Savage. I'm with the FBI. Can we talk about recent events at work? Let's sit down.

The speaker is discussing a person named Kent and trying to find information about him. They mention searching for his name online and asking if he has been in trouble before. They also mention not knowing his driver's license number and asking for his last name and birthday. They come across a Paris organization number that they are unfamiliar with and mention contacting the screening center. They find a phone number for border patrol and mention contacting the FBI. The speaker is unsure who is calling but plans to check with the border patrol and call the FBI.

The speaker mentions having spoken with whistleblowers and an informant who provided valuable information. However, they express difficulty in locating the informant at present. The whistleblower is considered credible and has knowledge of the informant. It is hoped that the informant can be found, but it is noted that informants in the spy business tend to avoid being seen or attracting attention.

I'm John Gray from the FBI. Is Miss Anderson available? No, she's not. I wanted to talk to her about the Baton Rouge case. Can I schedule a meeting with her?

The speaker is discussing a person named Kent and trying to find information about him. They mention searching for his name online and asking if he has been in trouble before. They also mention not knowing his driver's license number and asking for his last name and birthday. They come across a Paris organization number that they are unfamiliar with and mention contacting the screening center. They find a phone number for border patrol and mention contacting the FBI. The speaker is unsure who is calling but plans to check with the border patrol and call the FBI.

The speaker is asked about a claim made by Steven Nayeroff, who said that when he was arrested, the FBI demanded information from him about various people, including the speaker. The speaker states that they were not aware of this until it came out, and upon looking into it, they noticed that there were many names on the list. The press only focused on a few well-known individuals. The speaker confirms that they have no knowledge about the situation.

The speaker is discussing a person named Kent and trying to find information about him. They mention searching for his name online and asking if he has been in trouble before. They also mention not knowing his driver's license number and asking for his last name and birthday. They come across a Paris organization number and mention contacting the screening center. They find a phone number for border patrol and mention contacting the FBI. The speaker is unsure about who is calling but plans to call the FBI.

Speaker 0 is discussing a person named Kent and trying to find information about him. They mention searching for his name online and not finding anything. They ask Kent if he has ever been in trouble before and if he knows his driver's license number. They also mention a Paris organization number that they are unfamiliar with. Speaker 0 notices that they have the phone number for border patrol and the FBI and decides to call the FBI. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 mentioning that they will be checking with the FBI.