reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 gave the FBI a thumb drive containing 29 minutes of high-definition video showing two men attacking a building. As of this morning, neither man has been arrested. Speaker 0 states that despite going through over 725 indictments, none of their video or even a single still picture of either man has appeared on the Internet. The FBI is allegedly refusing to take Speaker 0's calls, return emails, or accept an offer to meet. Speaker 0 believes the FBI is hiding these men. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to inquire about the identities of these men. Speaker 0 confirms that Ben Grundler has all this information and that they have been in contact for over a year.

In this video, a former US government official, Dr. Robert Kadlik, reveals private discussions he had with Dr. Anthony Fauci about downplaying the lab leak theory. Dr. Kadlik explains that the intention was to prevent accusations and allegations, but it backfired. He suggests that Dr. Fauci may have been concerned about protecting his reputation and the reputation of his institute. Dr. Kadlik feels an obligation to share what happened and provide a factual account of their actions, without seeking sympathy or forgiveness.

Speaker 1 describes a man on the team who, after he was shot, runs toward the vehicles, stays outside the vehicles, and films a TikTok selfie video. They ask to identify this person, and it is confirmed to be the audio-visual (AV) team member who runs the cameras. This individual is said to have said, “Charlie just got shot,” and is the same person associated with the footage and the AV setup contracted to shoot the coverage. Speaker 0 clarifies that this person works for a company called VI, which provides contract AV/video personnel, and is not a security guy. He is the AV team member who runs the cameras. He also is described as the person who “took down the cameras” and there were questions about what happened to the footage, noting that this is a legitimate inquiry. Speaker 1 adds that after the event, someone goes to the camera behind Charlie, pulls the camera down, and it looks like they pull the SD card out; this footage is in the hands of the FBI and was not deleted or erased. The SD card was pulled by someone named Senga, and the footage ended up with the FBI. Speaker 0 reiterates that the AV person works for VI, the video contracting company, not as security. He expresses confusion about the phone usage and states that it’s not for him to understand that part; he observes that, in tragic events, people pull their phones out instead of running, and says that’s for the AV person to explain. He notes that the AV person does not work for them, but from what he has seen, this is the same person who took down the cameras, prompting legitimate questions about where that footage went. He confirms that the person was interviewed by the FBI, asked questions, and that all relevant material was turned over.

Speaker 0 describes an encounter where a person tells her, “good luck to your husband dealing with you,” and she responds, “my husband loves me.” The other person replies that “that’s why we’re trying to get him fired,” indicating to Speaker 0 that this is not an isolated incident but part of an organized group aiming to destroy both her and her husband’s livelihoods because of her political criticisms of a foreign government. Speaker 0 emphasizes her husband has nothing to do with her career, works in athletics at a school, loves his students, and is not going to issue a statement condemning his wife. Speaker 0 explains that the group’s goal is to destroy her husband’s livelihood for failing to condemn her publicly. She notes that the husband wants no part in politics and is not responsible for her career. She decides to file a police report and asks for identifying information about a woman she encountered, including video of the woman and her dog, to corroborate the incident. Speaker 0 highlights the woman’s alleged attempt to sic her dog on Speaker 0 and her dog, pointing to the dog’s behavior as evidence. She asks the woman if it was appropriate to use her dog in that way, and the woman denies it, insisting she did not sick the dog on them. The conversation shifts as Speaker 0 presents a separate video that she claims proves her account. The other person attempts to interrupt, insisting, “You’re trying to get me fired,” and Speaker 0 counters that everyone is trying to get her fired and that the other person is part of that group. Speaker 1 admits that others are trying to get Speaker 0 fired and acknowledges that the other person is “part of that everybody.” Speaker 0 reiterates that the woman tried to sic her dog on them and threatens her husband’s livelihood, asserting she will not be intimidated. Speaker 0 emphasizes she will continue her commentary and will not apologize for her actions or stance, even if the confrontation involves threats or stalking behavior online. Throughout, Speaker 0 frames the situation as an organized effort to silence and ruin both her and her husband over her political critique of a foreign government, while defending her husband’s innocence and his separation from her professional life. She asserts resolve to document the incident and press charges, and to persist with her public commentary despite the confrontation.

An individual questions whether an action is due to a security concern or an intimidation tactic. The response indicates it is a security matter. Later, the individual asks why they are not being arrested and demands to see video footage. They express distress, stating "That is not okay." Another person urges calm. The individual mentions "FinCEO" and claims they will be arrested despite knowing nothing. They thank someone for their support and ask why another person isn't being arrested, claiming to have witnessed them slap someone. They deny anyone said "stab him." They state that even asking an impolite question could lead to arrest.

A journalist, while interviewing Minister Freeland, is arrested by a police officer. The journalist claims he was just doing his job and denies assaulting anyone. He requests to have the microphone and expresses his disbelief at being arrested. He accuses the police of following orders and compares the situation to the Gestapo. The video ends abruptly.

Speaker 0 confesses in a video that they were paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they mention it was part of an organized effort.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 address a viral video about Charlie’s chief of staff, Mikey, and explain why they are discussing it. - The video in question attacks Mikey, Charlie’s chief of staff, claiming based on a few seconds of clips that he allegedly has a nonchalant or calm reaction to Charlie’s murder. They describe this as a “extremely disgusting attack.” - Speaker 1 recounts what happened: they were at the scene when a shooting occurred. The loud crack is heard; they turn and see Charlie has been shot. They realize there is a shooter on the scene. They decide to get out of there rather than be shot, noting Charlie had a security team that leapt into action to get Charlie out. - Speaker 0 notes their own actions: he, too, considered getting into the car, but decided against it. He was ahead of Mikey as they left. He recalls a moment where he paused to assess the situation, then saw Mikey, who was profoundly freaked out. Mikey’s lip was quivering, and he said, “I need to call Erica,” then took his phone and began calling Erica. Speaker 0 also called his own mom, saying there had been a shooting and that he was okay. - They describe Mikey’s later actions: after the initial shock, Mikey took charge like a “general directing a battle,” coordinating hospital transport and information flow, and directing people where to go. When they learned Charlie had died, Mikey told them, “now none of you can say anything that you've heard because it is Erica is not going to hear about this from anyone except me.” - Speaker 2 asks if Mikey could be involved in a conspiracy to murder Charlie. Speaker 1 responds that such accusations are vile and describes how some people online fuel such narratives, comparing the mindset to getting a “high” from dangerous or provocative content. - The speakers emphasize Mikey’s heroic actions: Mikey was distressed but stepped up to direct people and communicate with Erica and others. Speaker 0 notes that he, too, was traumatized after learning of Charlie’s death and rushed to be with Erica and the team. - They address the specific allegation that Mikey was on the phone immediately during the incident; they state he was not on the phone but was taking social videos to share with their group chats. He would send updates to Charlie’s social media during the event while the crowd was changing, then, overwhelmed by the noise and shock, he put his fingers in his ears but his phone remained in his hand as he moved away. - They describe the scene as a cordoned-off area with a narrow gap that people used to exit, where Mikey walked briskly or ran as he processed the trauma and continued to direct actions. They reiterate Mikey “turned into a general on a field marshaling the troops.” - Speaker 1 closes by urging readers who propagate narratives attacking Mikey to reconsider, stating that such narratives are bad and gross and a choice that shouldn’t be made.

Speaker 0 asks the person what happened and what they were trying to do, specifically if they were trying to protect someone.

The video transcript involves a confrontation between a journalist and a police officer during a press event. The journalist questions why the government supports the IRDC and is subsequently arrested. The journalist claims innocence and requests the incident to be recorded. The journalist expresses frustration with the government's actions and accuses them of prioritizing political correctness over addressing important issues. The journalist's cameraman is also mentioned as being harmless. The police officer provides a brief statement about everyone's safety.

The speaker acknowledges the risks of their actions but believes that exposing the truth is worth it. They are prepared to face imprisonment and criticism. In another segment, an IT worker is accused of spreading misinformation about vaccine-related deaths. The worker appeared in court, and the health agency is working to recover the data and reassure the public about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. The worker allegedly shared cases of individuals who died after receiving the vaccine, citing cardiac arrest, brain bleeds, blood clots, and aneurysms as causes of death. The speaker emphasizes that they are not an expert but are willing to face criticism if it helps stop the misinformation.

Speaker 0 confronts someone who is recording a video of them in a public place. Speaker 0 insists that the video should not be saved as it could cause trouble for them. Speaker 0 tries to delete the video from their phone, but the other person refuses to let them. Speaker 0 asks for a moment to delete the video.

Someone sent the speaker a video of a young, talented person from Chicago attacking him, claiming his father was in the CIA. The speaker initially dismissed this as untrue. However, after his father's death in March, he learned his father was indeed involved in that world, which shocked him. The speaker questions how this person knew about his father's involvement in intelligence, given his father's age. The person in the video claimed the speaker was a CIA operative. The speaker vehemently denies this, expressing strong animosity towards the CIA. He also says the person has since claimed he is funded by Russia. The speaker finds the CIA accusation personally offensive.

A person confronts a truck driver for allegedly speeding and causing an accident that resulted in fatalities. The person claims to be a trucker himself and states that he reported the driver for speeding. He says that two people are confirmed dead and possibly two more. He tells the driver he is going to be arrested for manslaughter. The driver then attempts to leave the scene.

The speaker expresses their willingness to face the consequences of their actions, believing that any attempt to imprison them will only expose the truth. They acknowledge the risks involved but are prepared to be targeted and made fun of. The video then shifts to a news report about an IT worker accused of accessing health data to spread misinformation about vaccine-related deaths. The report mentions specific cases of individuals who allegedly died after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. The speaker reiterates their willingness to be targeted and ridiculed, emphasizing that their goal is to stop the misinformation and protect others.

The speaker discusses the transportation of mini batteries and how they are sent all over the place. They mention the country of origin and express concern about human trafficking. They mention recently documented travelers being released from ICE and getting to their destinations with the help of Team Liberty, a non-government organization. The speaker asks how the person got their job and learns they are a volunteer. They express disagreement about people being dropped off without help. The speaker asks if they can come closer and take a video, but the person declines, stating that it is not allowed.

In 2012, the speaker's property was raided by the government, resulting in the destruction of their belongings and the shooting of their dog. Angry about this, the speaker donated laptops with spyware to government secretaries. This allowed them to gain control over the entire government computer system. While monitoring the system, the speaker discovered that the Minister of National Defense was involved in drug trafficking and the Minister of Immigration was involved in human trafficking. The speaker concludes by stating that they don't want to be killed by these individuals.

Speaker 0 states that someone is killing people and something happened to a guy, which they dislike. Speaker 1 asks Speaker 0 about a report that a Russian commander said Putin was almost caught in a drone attack from Ukraine. Speaker 0 responds that they haven't heard about the drone attack report, but it could be a reason for the killing.

The speaker discusses the situation with Mr. Navalny, stating that they have no direct involvement in the matter. They believe that the Americans scared the world with their actions and that Mr. Navalny ended up in their transit zone. They mention that Russia is not a country that extradites people and that they have provided him with asylum. The speaker questions how Mr. Navalny will live in the future and mentions that he has not revealed any secrets. They conclude by saying that he only publishes information through a channel known only to him.

Speaker 0 confesses in a video that they were paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they mention it was part of an organized effort.

A speaker defends someone shown in a video, stating he is not a thug but a school student with five kids on the honor roll. This is in response to an incident where the person in the video smacked someone. The speaker references Chief Terry Fiji's statement that anyone using their hands to intend harm will face consequences, regardless of which side of the fight they are on. The speaker indicates to expect more arrests related to the incident.

The speaker explains that the government wanted to arrest them after raiding their property and causing damage. In response, the speaker donated laptops with spyware to government secretaries, gaining control over the entire government computer system. They were searching for evidence of being set up but instead discovered that the minister of national defense was involved in drug trafficking and the minister of immigration was involved in human trafficking. The speaker acknowledges the danger of sharing this information and suggests that it is best to keep it undisclosed.

The speaker expresses their willingness to face the consequences of their actions, believing that any attempt to imprison them will only expose the truth. They acknowledge the risks involved but are prepared to be targeted and made fun of. The video then shifts to a news report about an IT worker accused of accessing health data to spread misinformation about vaccine-related deaths. The report mentions specific cases of individuals who allegedly died after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. The speaker reiterates their willingness to be targeted and ridiculed, emphasizing that their goal is to stop the spread of misinformation and protect others.

Speaker 1 informs Lloyd about the World Trade Center incident, stating that the second tower exploded. They explain that they were at a garage rooftop after voting and witnessed the explosion, capturing it on video. They clarify that it was not a plane crash but rather a bomb, as the building exploded from the impact of the other tower.

In this video, Speaker 1 confronts Dennis Gilliam about his alleged involvement in certain Signal and Telegram groups. Dennis claims to have no knowledge of these groups and suggests that he may have been added without his consent. Speaker 1 believes Dennis is not the creator of these groups and wants to collaborate in identifying the real culprits. They discuss the possibility of Dennis being transferred to these groups through links posted on Facebook. Speaker 1 emphasizes that their main focus is finding the individuals responsible for creating and participating in these groups, rather than accusing Dennis. Additionally, the video discusses how the speaker was led to various groups on Signal through provocative photos on Facebook. They mention that both boys and girls are being posted in these groups, with mainly women being posted in the videos. The age range of individuals in the groups is mostly teens and twenties. The speaker admits to clicking on links and seeing pictures and videos but claims to have quickly exited when uncomfortable. They mention that the groups are primarily in Spanish and that they have seen links with pictures and videos being posted. However, the frequency of inappropriate content being posted in the groups remains uncertain. The video also features a conversation between Speaker 1, Speaker 2, and Speaker 3. Speaker 1 confronts Speaker 2 about his alleged involvement in groups that post explicit content involving minors. Speaker 2 denies any knowledge or intent to view such content, but Speaker 1 presses for more information. Speaker 3, who is also present, shares that he has grandchildren and works in mental health. The conversation becomes tense as Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 2 of clicking on videos featuring young children. Speaker 2 admits to accidentally clicking on such videos multiple times. The conversation continues with Speaker 1 explaining their organization's work and Speaker 2's involvement. The video ends with Speaker 2 deleting evidence from his phone.