reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Genesis: 'And God said, I will curse those who curse Israel' and 'And through you, I will bless all nations.' These quotes were spoken to Abraham. He asks, 'are Israelites or are Jews still God's chosen people?' and answers, 'No.' He cites Galatians: 'There is neither Jew nor Gentile slave nor free nor is there male or female for you all are one in Christ Jesus.' 'If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed and heirs according to the promise.' He claims this provides 'clear and undeniable evidence from scripture that God said that if you are one in Christ, you are God's people, and you are the seed of Abraham.' He states, 'the modern day Jews that reside in the state of Israel are not God's people. It is the Christians, the people who are one in Christ.' He urges, 'Read these passages, read the context around them, and don't just go based upon one little pluck from the bible to base your entire belief system off of when it comes to who are God's people.'

"If you read the patriarchal histories in the opening books of the bible, if you read Genesis, for instance, chapter six, this is the account of God regretting that he had made the human race." "the world had become full of violence." "When you attack another man when you attack another man, you attack God because every human being, as you were just saying so beautifully, is made in the image of God." "we have this level of violence in a culture that murders unborn children at the rate that we do and have sustained it for the decades that we have." "The statistics are horrible for our country. We are so captured, by an ideology that is hopeless, atheism, strict secularism, which is running our country now." "Without that belief, certainly, we have no future."

The conversation centers on whether “Judeo-Christian values” is an acceptable term, given religious differences between Judaism and Christianity. The first speaker, addressing Mr. Shapiro, says Mr. Shapiro has consistently promoted the idea that America was built on Judeo-Christian values. As a devout Christian, the speaker claims difficulty accepting the term because Judaism rejects Jesus. The speaker contrasts Christian beliefs that Jesus Christ is God with what they describe as teachings in the Talmud, saying it teaches that Jesus is burning in hellfire and excrement. They also point to a conflict with the New Testament’s teachings to love enemies and pray for persecutors, referencing the speaker’s claim that “verse 15 of the Talmud states that even the best of the gentiles should be killed.” The speaker asks why Mr. Shapiro insists on using what they call an “oxymoronic term” given these “irreconcilable differences.” Mr. Shapiro responds that the speaker’s reading of the Talmud is “a really bad read.” He also argues that the idea that any text can support the claim that Judaism, “broad writ,” is disdainful or hateful toward Christians or toward non-Jews is “a tremendous misread of Judaism over the centuries and particularly today.” He states that he can cite parts of the New Testament he finds personally problematic, as well as parts of the Quran he finds personally problematic, and that he could likely find problematic parts in the Old Testament as well. He says this does not indicate what Judaism is or its historic impact on the world. Mr. Shapiro asserts that “Judaism is the foundation of Christianity,” and says Jesus and the New Testament acknowledge this. He argues that claiming Judaism and Christianity are completely “de-linked” and teach two completely separate lessons ignores that the Old Testament is part of the New Testament. He says Christians and Jews think differently, but that the idea that they are completely disconnected is wrong. He further responds to the criticism based on Talmud citations by saying that citing texts from around 500 CE, during a time when Jews were being persecuted by Christians in the Roman Empire, is “a real stretch” to conclude that Jews today are overall hateful of Christians. He adds that he tells Christians to go to church and to reengage with their faith, and says he does not try to convert people to Judaism because it is forbidden in Jewish law. He concludes by saying there is a group online that spends all day cherry-picking bad lines from the Talmud to create a “giant myth” that Jews seek the extermination of Christians or some other conspiracy theory, which he calls a lie, and he reiterates that Judeo-Christian values are “quite real” because Judaism and Christianity have “an awful lot in common.”

The discussion centers on the way lawmakers reference religion in foreign policy and whether that approach is effective. Speaker 0 asks the audience how many think a respected lawmaker like Ted Cruz uses the Bible to justify aid to Israel, even if he doesn’t know the verse, and whether that is the best approach. Speaker 1 responds by referencing Ted Cruz’s Genesis twelve three, and notes that many find that off-putting when contrasted with the New Testament, specifically Paul’s writings about the new flesh not being the same as the people in the old covenant. Speaker 1 asks, “Yes. Romans nine?” and agrees with the sentiment. Speaker 0 then asks Speaker 1 if they are Catholic, to which Speaker 1 replies that they are converting Catholic from Judaism, revealing that they are ethnically Jewish. The exchange confirms Speaker 1’s Jewish ethnicity. Speaker 0 brings up concerns about APAC, asking if Speaker 1 has concerns about APAC. Speaker 1 confirms that they do. Speaker 0 notes that some people tell them that criticizing APAC equates to being anti-Semitic, asking whether this is true. Speaker 1 calls that notion ridiculous and says it’s great to have concern for one’s country. The conversation shifts to APAC’s influence. Speaker 0 presents a characterization (as a possible summary of Speaker 1’s view) that APAC represents a form of prioritization that cuts in line, away from the American people. Speaker 0 asks whether this is a fair summary. Speaker 1 answers affirmatively, “100%.” Finally, they articulate the core idea: the public votes and are citizens, but a separate group is described as receiving higher priority for whatever reasons. Speaker 1’s agreement underscores a shared concern that APAC’s influence creates a prioritization that bypasses the ordinary American electorate.

America will cease to be America if it does not have a Christian foundation. If America is Christian, it will still be America, regardless of the ethnic makeup of the population.

The speaker asserts alignment with justice, invoking power civics and the people, tempered by mercy, because a republic without mercy cannot endure. The speaker emphasizes that this stance is not extremism but an inheritance to be cherished, urging the audience to affirm it alongside the speaker. The call is for the congregation to say it will not fail or squander this inheritance, and the speaker pledges not to be the generation that squanders it. The speaker urges readers to engage directly with foundational texts: the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence. They also emphasize reading the Federalist Papers and the Anti-Federalist Papers, insisting on studying them to understand the founding era and the assurances surrounding governance. A key claim repeated is that the Anti-Federalists “would have never formed the federal government without the bill of rights,” highlighting the protection and inclusion of rights as essential to the formation of the federal framework. The speaker notes that these rights have been infringed upon “the last one hundred years,” drawing attention to perceived chronic encroachments on foundational liberties. Throughout, the rhetoric emphasizes reverence for constitutional safeguards and the enduring nature of the republic when mercy and justice guide public life. The speaker frames reading and understanding these documents as essential to resisting erosion of rights and to maintaining the legitimacy and stability of the republic. The overarching message combines moral obligation, historical awareness, and a call to action to preserve and honor the constitutional inheritance through informed citizen engagement.

Speaker 0 believes America was founded on Judeo-Christian values and Israel on Father Abraham. It's important to educate future generations about this foundation, preaching, teaching, and researching it. Speaker 1 notes that people assume current trends will continue, questioning if the younger generation in Israel will fight for their country. However, they fought like lions, as the Bible says. Similarly, some worry about waning Christian support for Israel and commitment to traditional American values. Speaker 1 believes a change is happening with people seeking spiritual content and returning to religion. When they seek the wellsprings of civilization, they'll return to their roots in the land at the edge of Asia and the Mediterranean.

Disobedience to God, as seen in the United States and the Western world, brings curses upon a nation, according to Deuteronomy. The speaker suggests examining who holds the primary position in all aspects of life in these countries. If anyone other than Jesus Christ is first, then the speaker claims that these countries should not be surprised when they are torn apart physically, spiritually, and emotionally.

According to the speaker, the United States and the Western world are experiencing the consequences of disobedience. Referencing Deuteronomy, the speaker suggests researching the curses of disobedience to understand what happens to a nation. The speaker urges listeners to examine who holds power in every aspect of life in their country. If it is anyone besides Jesus Christ, then the speaker claims that the nation should not be surprised when it is torn apart physically, spiritually, and emotionally.

"As Christians support the government of Israel, we are commanded to support Israel." "It says that those who bless you, Abraham, this was before Israel, will be blessed by God." "And those who curse you, Abraham, will be cursed by God." "For not all who are born into the nation of Israel are truly members of God's people." "Being descendants of Abraham doesn't make them truly Abraham's children." "Israel didn't have a nation or a land to call their own for almost two thousand years since the destruction of the temple in the year seventy AD." "The nation of Israel was recreated through some political operatives after World War II." "I think the scripture makes it clear that it's about whether you're blessing or cursing the true children of Abraham, those who believe the promises of the gospel."

The transcript centers on a chaotic, on-the-ground interview set around a political event described as America First, with strong pro- and anti-Israel sentiments and tensions about free speech and enforcement. - Inside the event, Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss being kicked out and the mystery of why someone was trespassed. They question why they were removed, claiming they were curious about the treatment of the other person and asserting, “There’s no reason you’re getting kicked out.” - The speakers insist on the idea of free speech in America, contrasting it with what they see as limits on criticizing Israel. They reference Candace Owens’ planned appearance and note that Turning Point disavowed her views, stating the organization “does not sponsor her views” and that she’s “not an employee,” implying a hypocrisy in defending free speech while limiting critique of Israel. - There is a recurring theme that Israel is being criticized as a global issue, with claims that “Israel’s leadership be kissing our wall” and assertions that Israel is prosecuting a genocide in Gaza. They state numbers and condemnations, including claims that “they’ve killed 30,000 women and children,” and accuse Israel of using U.S. money and bombs. - The conversation shifts to Christian concerns, arguing that Christians are harmed by Israeli policy—citing that Israel vandalizes Christian churches, bomb Christians in Gaza, and bans the gospel. They argue that if Israel is the “holy land for Christians,” its actions contradict that claim, labeling the land “the devil’s land in Israel” and asserting that “they hate Jesus.” - The speakers discuss anti-Semitism laws, noting that Republicans in multiple states have backed anti-Semitism measures and that there are efforts in Congress and the Department of Education. They claim the definition of anti-Semitism has been broadened to prohibit statements like, for example, saying that Jews killed Jesus, referencing what they describe as the Passion narratives. - Personal beliefs and identity come into play, including an exchange about who should lead, with Speaker 0 saying Christians should be central, and Speaker 1 emphasizing that the country should be Christian and that “Christ is the king of the world,” advocating for Christian leadership in America. - The group comments on the ease of entry and exit from the event, noting that security is visible and that protesters are across the street in a designated protest area. They mention plans to possibly debate Charlie Kirk on the issue, and discuss the internal dynamics of the movement, criticizing figures like Brooke Rollins and JD Vance as part of a broader critique that “America First” has been undermined by insiders. - The conversation ends with plans to leave the scene, take photos, and reconnect with their driver, signaling a departure from the event after a brief appearance and confrontation. They reference future actions, including potential debates and continued protests, and acknowledge the frustration of the current situation.

Rabbi Lam states that Judaism is the most influential tradition of wisdom, with the Hebrew Bible as its foundation and a bestseller. He connects Elon Musk to the scientific revolution, noting figures like Bacon and Newton studied Hebrew literature and admired the idea that humans are created in God's image, inspiring creativity and innovation. He asserts the American political experiment is anchored in the Hebrew Bible, especially Deuteronomy, cited more than Locke or Montesquieu. He mentions the Roman historian Tacitus, who criticized the Jewish Sabbath as lazy, but now the Sabbath is observed globally while the Roman Empire has collapsed. Speaker 2 claims to have brought more Americans to Christianity than any living Christian, despite antisemitism done in the name of Christ.

The speaker argues that our country was founded upon Judeo-Christian principles and values to make it a godly nation, and that we must reconnect with the spirituality of why it was created. The struggle we face is described as a battle between good and evil, with the infiltration into the country labeled the single greatest threat. This threat is intellectual, emotional, physical, and spiritual. The speaker emphasizes that the United States is a republic with a representative form of government, where “we, the people” determine how we will live. They note that the last ten presidential elections averaged 67% turnout, meaning more than 30% of registered voters did not vote. The call is to organize and cultivate a passion for the country, especially given the challenges ahead, which are described as formidable and tied to the adversaries who are “smart and evil.” A central message is that survival for the next two hundred fifty years depends on states standing up and embracing local action. The speaker urges people to take their concerns to their counties, towns, and churches, to speak up and to sound off. Each listener is urged to consider how they can serve today, because one person cannot control national events or Washington, D.C. but can influence life in their own community. To act, the speaker proposes practical ways to contribute: making phone calls, sending emails, writing letters, and going door to door. The overarching theme is service to the country here and now. The repeated exhortation is to carry this message home and to ask others the defining question: “How am I serving today?” and “How are you serving today?” The speaker acknowledges the inevitability of national leadership and personalities (e.g., Donald Trump) but asserts that individual citizens can shape their immediate surroundings by engaging in local efforts. The appeal is to dedicate time and energy to constitutional goals at the local level, to work toward objectives such as constitutional carry, and to determine how each person can contribute to their state and community. In closing, the speaker expresses a personal longing and emotional urgency, pleading with audiences to take the message back to their communities and to persist in asking others how they are serving today, in order to mobilize collective action and national resilience through local involvement.

Speaker asserts that "America was founded on faith" and that "when faith gets weaker, our country seems to get weaker." He notes that "when faith gets stronger, as it is right now, we're having a very good period of time" after "some rough years," and that "good things happen for our country." He adds, "It's amazing the way it seems to work that way." He claims that "under the Trump administration, we're defending our rights and restoring our identity as a nation under God." He concludes, "We are one nation under God, and we always will be."

The speaker asserts that “The Bush regime was front for the Vatican” and that “The most important enemy this country has today, people will never understand it, but the biggest enemy that this nation today has is the Vatican.” They question the origin of the nation’s founders, asking, “What do you think the founding fathers … where did they come from?” and answer, “they came from Europe.” The speaker traces history back to “twenty five hundred years Rome under the Caesars of Rome,” stating that “after the fall of the Caesars in the fourth century and with the coming of the Vatican in the fifth century,” Europe has been dominated for that same span. The claim is then made that “All of Europe has been dominated for over two thousand five hundred years by Rome and Europe has dominated the world for two thousand five hundred years.” The speaker urges listeners to “start looking at the Holy father, and you better start finding out the connection between the Vatican and the Nazi party of Adolf,” tying the Vatican to broader historical influence and power. The overarching assertion is that “The Bush regime was front for the Vatican,” and that the Vatican represents “the most important enemy this country has today.”

Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the declaration of independence and hence our form of government. It holds that our rights and our dignities come not from god but from government. It requires of the people a subservience and weakness incompatible with a constitution premised on the transcendent origin of our rights.

The United States was founded on common law, which is derived from Christian principles. Nine of the original 13 states required officials to be Bible-believing Christians, and all 13 required a declaration of faith. 55 of 56 signers of the Declaration were church-attending Christians. Common law principles like presumption of innocence, due process, and trial by jury are rooted in the Bible, specifically Leviticus. The Declaration of Independence references God and appeals to the "supreme judge of the universe," interpreted as Jesus Christ. Deuteronomy was the most quoted book during the founding. John Adams stated the Constitution was designed for a moral and religious people, specifically Christians. The current constitutional crisis stems from a Christian form of government existing without a Christian population, making liberty impossible.

Speaker 0 says they bought this Bible in an antique store, dating roughly 1825 or 1836. The first page has “a map A map? Of Palestine,” which he finds very interesting, and he notes some verses are “gone” or not there anymore, including “Matthew seven verses 21 through 23.” He quotes: “Many will say to me on that day, Lord, Lord, … we used to pray in your name, in the name of Jesus, … Get away from me, you evildoers. You lawless people. You workers of iniquity. Get away from me.” He claims this is Jesus on the day of judgment disowning his own people for not worshipping God, even though they did works in Jesus’ name. Speaker 1 adds: “The key to this is to realize that even Jesus realized and knew that you shouldn't pray to him because he was merely a mortal man. He knew that we needed to pray to a higher power, whether you wanna call it source, God, spirit, nature.” They claim “They removed these verses” to push energy into Jesus and to torture on the cross and through the Eucharist, calling the Bible tainted “to bend to the will of man, tainted to evil” and noting “evil doers who prayed to Jesus.” What do you make of that?

The speaker addresses the PUSD community, clarifying that the phrase "separation of church and state" is not in the US constitution but in a letter by Jefferson. They argue that board members Hill and Rooks have not broken any laws by reading scripture and are not promoting a state religion. The speaker criticizes those who oppose Hill and Rooks, accusing them of prejudice and sexualizing children. They call for the resignation of three board members and encourage Hill and Rooks to stay strong. The transcript ends with a verse from Psalm.

Rabbi Stephen s Weiss is cited as saying that Hitler was right about Jews being a race, arguing that the World Zionist Organization and its descendants follow in Theodore Herzl’s footsteps to create a “behemoth criminal outlaw mafia of Jew supremacy.” The speaker asserts there are “700 NGOs” serving Jewish causes, and that Jews act as a sovereign nation within host nations, pursuing Jewish interests “not above their host nations, but only at the detriment of their host nations,” implying Jews operate as an ethnic monolith and proclaim “we are a race” and an ethnic supremacist ideology. The claim is connected to the Kolergi plan, described as the erasure of the white European race, characterized as more ethnic than cultural, and presented as a racial tradition written after millennia of Christian history. Turning to biblical framing, the speaker cites First Peter 3:12, asserting that “no prophecy of scripture is of any private interpretation, but holy men spake as they were moved by the holy spirit,” and then presents John and Thessalonians as sources claiming Jews are adversaries to all men, who murdered prophets and the Lord Jesus, and are “pleasing not God,” thus enemies. The speaker declares no business dealings or obligations with Jews, aside from possibly conversion to salvation, and asserts an exclusionary stance toward Jews in America, referencing the framers of 1787 and Ben Franklin, who allegedly insisted on constitutionally excluding Jews due to their potential to erode the country’s moral fabric, smear Christianity, build a separate state within a state, and financially strangle the host nation if opposed. The claim is that without such exclusion, Americans would be in the fields while Jews would be in the counting rooms. The narrative connects these ideas to contemporary policy, claiming Jews hate “founding stock Americans,” and accuses Jews of “flooding the borders of every white European country” and using Germany as a cautionary tale against opposition to Jewish “degeneracy” and anti-host nation actions. It alleges Hitler wanted Germany to be for Germans, calling Hitler’s stance a grave mistake for opposing “the Jews.” The speaker asserts that the Jews declared war on Germany in 1933, eleven years before D-Day, and accuses them of deceit, insisting that listeners should accept a perspective that rejects Judeo-Christian norms, money, military power, intelligence sharing, and lawfulness. The speaker appeals to a community of listeners who frequent spaces with contributors like Truce, Joanne, and Tyler, claiming broad dissatisfaction with “Judeo bullshit, exile horseshit,” and rejecting Jews’ continued presence in the United States and elsewhere.

According to the speaker, the United States and the Western world are experiencing the consequences of disobedience. Referencing Deuteronomy, the speaker suggests researching the curses of disobedience to understand what happens to a nation. The speaker urges listeners to examine who holds the primary position in all aspects of life in their country. If it is anyone other than Jesus Christ, then the speaker claims that the nation should not be surprised when it is torn apart physically, spiritually, and emotionally.

America will cease to be America if it does not have a Christian foundation. If America is Christian, it will still be America, regardless of the ethnic makeup of the population.

Speaker 0: Only do the gospel. I don't touch politics. How would you respond to an American pastor that Speaker 1: I'm not really sure where is that in the bible. Like Joseph was a politician. Joshua was a politician. Elijah spoke to politicians. Elisha spoke to politicians. Speaker 0: of view, and that's why Jensen Franklin and this church deserves such credit for hosting an event like this because the majority of American churches stayed silent during this last election. Speaker 1: churches in America are communist accidentally, and they don't know it. And the reason I say that, the goal of communism was to get Christianity out of the public square and was to get the church out of politics. Karl Marx literally said, my goal is to kick God destroy capitalism. When pastors participate in this lie of the church students speak about politics, they are going off to a communist worldview.

Speaker 0 speaks on the ethical teachings of the movement, stating that reason, reverence are not just desirable but necessary for the survival of reason of civilization. He proclaims this day as Education Day and extends warm regards to the celebration of the Rebbe’s 80th birthday. Speaker 1 conveys the rabbi’s regards and wishes for the president to carry out the extraordinary role assigned by the Almighty, with health and happiness alongside the first lady. He expresses hope that the president will continue the great historical work on behalf of education, specifically by returning the traditional values that have been the bedrock of civilization since the beginning. He mentions the seven Noachide laws contained and given by Moses as reflected in the scroll. Speaker 2 challenges the proclamation, stating that by proclaiming the Rebbe’s birthday as Education Day and declaring the Noahide laws as the foundational basis of America, Reagan violated the separation of church and state and bowed to Schneerson as if the Messiah. He asserts that the seven Noahide laws, which Reagan signed off on, compel the beheading of all Christians, Hindus, and other idolaters, and that the kabbalistic Lubavitcher Rebbe proclaimed that Jews alone have holy souls while Gentiles’ souls derive from three satanic spheres and are entirely evil. He accuses Reagan of praising a racist Jewish supremacist. Speaker 1 reiterates the support of spiritual leaders today, listing Babish Nielsen as bringing the message of support for freedom and the great endeavors. He notes the use of the menorah twice as a symbol of freedom and asserts that too many people speak of freedom of religion in terms of freedom from religion rather than freedom of religion. He remarks that Hanukkah represents the victory of spirituality over secularization as depicted by the Hellenists, and that the president set a tone for leaders to sign the International School of Honor, promoting the return to tradition through the seven Noachide laws. Speaker 2 continues the critique, labeling the president’s actions as not content with annual presidential bending to the false messiah, Rebbe Schneerson, and as an illegal recognition of the Noahide laws as the supreme law of the land in America. He notes that Carter began the effort in 1978 at the insistence of Congress and that every president since followed it. He cites House Joint Resolution 104 (1st Session, 102nd Congress, January 1991) designating March 26, 1991 as Education Day USA. The resolution recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles—the bedrock of civilization—known as the seven Noachide laws, and notes the Lubavitch movement’s promotion of these values. It states that Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson is universally respected and revered, and that his 80th birthday falls on March 26, 1991, with his ninetieth year seen as a time of education and giving. It calls for the world to return to moral and ethical values contained in the seven Noachide laws, reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the president and other heads of state, and directs the president to issue a proclamation for observance of Education Day USA on March 26, 1991, with the president, the Speaker of the House, the vice president, and the president of the Senate participating.