TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Palestine was never Britain's to give away. The truth will set you free. Washington is Israel's most subservient colony. I'm a former Zionist and Jew, join me in uncovering the truth. Netanyahu said the 9/11 attacks swung American opinion in Israel's favor, using it to terrorize the public into supporting Middle East wars for Israel's benefit. Al-Qaeda and ISIS were created by the Mossad and CIA to justify these wars and advance Israel's goal of a Middle East empire. Israel used 10/07/2023 as justification to implement a plan for genocide against Palestinians. JFK supported Palestinian refugee rights and opposed Israel's nuclear program, leading to conflicts with Zionist leaders.

"New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, The Nation, Mother Jones, GLAAD." "Breitbart, Daily Caller, Epic Times, Fox News, New York Post, The Federalist." "Anti defamationally gets a green light." "Only for some. Yes. If you're reporting about the about the Arab Israeli conflict? Yes. You may not cite them." "You can't you can't find the Jewish perspective on the war so easily anymore on Wikipedia." "There is a a serious academic encyclopedia of Christianity that is not allowed on Wikipedia." "Daily Caller not allowed." "Life site news not allowed." "Sputnik, of course, not allowed." "TV Guide allowed." "The Uns review not allowed." "TV Guide totally cool." "Uns. V dare not allow." "Mister x is the name of his account." "This is obviously huge news."

Israel and its supporters are actively working to censor the internet and promote the Israeli narrative while suppressing information about Palestine and the Israel lobby. This includes orchestrated projects sponsored by the Israeli government and pro-Israel groups. The Israeli military's new media desk employs soldiers to engage in online activities, while the National Union of Israeli Students pays students to combat hostile websites. Organizations like CAMERA and ACTIL also target public information online to shape the pro-Israel narrative. Major internet companies, including Google and Facebook, have been cooperating with Israel to delete content deemed incendiary. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) considers criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism and has developed the online hate index to identify and censor hate speech.

My Israel has organized an instructional day for Wikideiters to teach them how to edit Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the top source of information globally. They aim to have an impact on articles like the Gaza Flotilla, influencing the content, tone, and ensuring a balanced and Zionist perspective.

"Anti defamation league gets a green light." "Only for some. Yes." "You may not cite them." "You can't you can't find the Jewish perspective on the war so easily anymore." "Not to my knowledge, except now there is a congressional investigation." "I don't know if my tweet had anything to do with the start of that." "I think it had more to do with the reporting of Ashley Rinsberg." "And well, of course, Israel and I would add, Hindus are very bothered with the way that their ethnic groups are treated in Wikipedia." "And both of both a whole bunch of Jews and Hindus have been after me in the last couple of years saying, you've got to speak out." "You've got to speak out." "People who are organized have a way to push back against the lying." "I think that if, like, Israeli intelligence, for example, got together and made a real concerted effort to to fight against the this group of 40 Muslim activists that Ashley Rinsberg identified." "They might be able to make some inroads." "It really depends It's possible."

An Israel instruction day for Wiki editors aims to teach people how to edit Wikipedia, described as the number one source of information. The goal is to influence what is written on Wikipedia, ensuring it is balanced and Zionist in nature. One attendee wants to learn how Israelis and Jews can defend Israel online, particularly on Wikipedia. They had previously tried to edit things against Israel, but the changes were erased. They believe this knowledge is important for anyone who wants to defend Israel on the Internet. It's important to counteract antisemitism and anti-Zionism online and ensure their side of the story gets the coverage it needs. They believe initiatives to educate and promote the defense of Israel online are extremely important.

The transcript presents a provocative examination of organized crime, arguing that Jewish crime networks, rather than Italians, have historically been the dominant force behind global organized crime and that mainstream media and political power actively obscure this reality. Key claims and points include: - Hollywood imagery has ingrained a link between organized crime and Italians, with films like The Godfather and Goodfellas shaping public perception. In reality, Italians constitute only a tiny fraction of organized crime in the Western world, the speaker asserts. - A controversial WikiLeaks cable from the American Embassy in Jerusalem, titled Promised Land of Organized Crime, is described as warning American law enforcement about the severe threat of Jewish organized crime to America. The speaker claims this cable details extensive Jewish involvement in organized crime and asserts it reveals a hidden history not covered by major media. - The speaker cites a 2010 Al Jazeera interview with Julian Assange, claiming Assange said only a small portion of Israel-related files had been published because newspapers with exclusive rights did not want to publish damaging material about Israel. It is claimed that 3,700 files relate to Israel, with 2,700 from Israeli sources, and that in six months more would be published depending on sources. The speaker argues this demonstrates control of the press by Jewish interests. - The narrative contends that the media’s willingness to publish cables that criticize Western powers contrasts with a reluctance to publish cables about Israel, suggesting media censorship and a protective stance toward Israel due to Jewish influence. It is asserted that this media control shows “the real power in the media.” - The heart of the cable is summarized as showing that Israel is the world center for many criminal syndicates, with organized crime having a global reach and influence within Israel’s government. An example cited is the funeral of Shlomo Oz, with attendance by Amri Sharon, illustrating purported connections between political figures and organized crime. - The speaker asserts that Jews dominated organized crime in the United States during much of the 20th century, naming Murder, Inc. as the fountainhead of American organized crime and identifying Meyer Lansky as a key leader and Zionist. It is claimed that Newsweek described Lansky as pouring money into Israeli bonds and philanthropies, and that journalists like Jack Anderson discussed money laundering from the underworld into Israeli channels. - The claim extends to a long list of Jewish mobsters and the idea that Jewish influence shaped media and politics, with contrasts drawn to Italian mafia portrayals in Hollywood films. - The transfer of crime networks into international arenas is discussed, including Russian organized crime. The “Red Mafia” allegedly emerged from the Soviet collapse, with estimates of thousands of crime groups in the former Soviet Union and widespread protection rackets in Russia. The speaker quotes that by the mid-1990s there were 6,000 crime groups and that the mob controlled many banks; Moscow experienced thousands of mob-related homicides. - Testimonies from various speakers are included, with commentary from those who worked with different organized crime groups, including the assertion that the Russian mafia is highly educated and sophisticated and has extended into the United States and about 60 other countries. - The transcript also discusses white-slave trafficking, asserting that it is dominated by Jewish networks, with a cited 1998 New York Times article describing slave traders of Slavic women; the speaker contends the media would be uncomfortable labeling perpetrators as Jewish slave traders. - The closing segments condemn media censorship and urge viewers to expose organized crime, demanding action against media and government corruption, and promoting the speaker’s books, My Awakening and Jewish Supremacism, as further in-depth resources. Overall, the material argues that Jewish organized crime has historically guided and concealed a global criminal network, with substantial influence over media, politics, and law enforcement, while alleging the mainstream press suppresses this narrative.

My Israel has organized an instructional day for Wiki editors to teach them how to edit Wikipedia. They aim to have an impact on the information available on Wikipedia, which is considered the top source of information globally. They want to ensure that articles like the Gaza Flotilla reflect a balanced perspective and are influenced by their Zionist views.

Is the media presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Ethnic cleansing: the idea that population movement is equivalent to ethnic cleansing. If people want to leave, they can, but they're not being forced to leave. Moving people out of areas honeycombed with terrorist booby traps is not the same thing as ethnic cleansing. Ethnic cleansing is very often used as a softer form of the genocide attack, the idea that Israel is trying to kill everyone. Legacy media are radically anti Israel overall. The New York Times cannot be accused of being a pro Israel outlet. They're gonna say Ben pro Israel. You Jews own the media, Ben. I'm a Jew, I'm a Zionist. BB said 'you can't be MAGA if you're anti Israel.' You can disagree with Bibi's policies and still be MAGA. If you're pro Hamas, you're something darker, and we shouldn't put up with that.

"And that suits the Israelis just fine." "And if you're wondering why there's an awful lot of lunatic antisemitic comment about Israel online, you have to wonder how much of that is organic." "But how much of it is not organic at all?" "How much of that is being ginned up on purpose to make legitimate questions about the US government's relationship with the government of Israel seem like crackpot stuff, like hate, like David Duke level lunacy?" "Probably some because it serves their interest." "And so the true shame here, the actual villain in the story is the leadership of The United States that is putting up with serial humiliation for decades." "You'd think every country would act that way, and most do." "And for what reason? So if there's someone to be mad at, it's our leaders."

"But October 7 in the Hamas raid in Southern Israel changed minds on this app. Explain how." "over 60% of the content that is pro Hamas, pro Palestine content, it's actually generated in Bangladesh, Malaysia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and then it is actually amplified in TikTok users' feeds in The United States." "the majority of the anti Israel content, it's actually generated and created overseas, and then the algorithm is tailored to push that content here in America." "it's not actually generated here in The United States. It's not a reflection of the sentiment here in The United States." "But think about the fact that in Israel, they have TikTok, and in Israel, they have manipulated the algorithm to show 90% of the sentiment is for pro Hamas in Israel." "Do you really think that Israelis after October 7 feel that that is the case?"

My Israel organized an instructional day for Wiki editors to teach them how to edit Wikipedia. They aim to have an influence on articles like the Gaza Flotilla, ensuring a balanced and Zionist perspective. Many Israelis and Jews attended to learn how to defend Israel online, specifically on Wikipedia. They found the platform complex and struggled with understanding the rules. Some attempted to make small edits favoring Israel but had their changes undone without explanation.

The speaker asserts that YouTube quietly deleted more than 700 videos documenting Israeli human rights violations, war crimes, and related abuses as part of an effort by the U.S. government to bury evidence of Israel’s actions in Gaza and the West Bank. According to The Intercept, YouTube surreptitiously deleted these videos in early October by wiping the accounts that posted them from the site along with their channel archives. The affected accounts belonged to three prominent Palestinian human rights groups: Al Haq, Al Mezan, the Center for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights. These three YouTube channels hosted hours of footage documenting and highlighting alleged Israeli government violations of international law in Gaza and the West Bank. The speaker emphasizes the importance of preserving this record to counter Hasbara and ensure documentation of war crimes for historical record, stating that there is a real and successful effort to wipe the Internet of these videos. The deleted content ranges from investigations, such as an analysis of the Israeli killing of American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, to testimonies of Palestinians tortured by Israeli forces, and documentaries like The Beach about children playing on a beach who were killed by an Israeli strike. The Intercept notes that the deletion affected the groups’ official channels, and not their alternate channels; videos reposted on other channels remain viewable. The speaker adds that while the official channels were deleted, other channels still host copies.

Goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza Flotilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and Zionist in their nature. Three days after the US Congress action, the House Oversight Committee demanded Wikipedia turn over identifying info for users who may be spreading anti Israel content based on a report from our ADL. Screenshots show: "we seek your assistance in obtaining documents and communications regarding individuals or specific accounts serving as Wikipedia volunteer editors who violated Wikipedia platform policies as well as your own efforts to thwart intentional organized efforts to inject bias into important and sensitive topics." Also: "one recent report raised troubling questions about potentially systematic efforts to advance anti Semitic and anti Israel information in Wikipedia articles related to conflicts with the state of Israel." Records show identifying characteristics of accounts, IP addresses, registration dates, user activity logs for editors subject to ARBCOMM, analysis by Wikimedia Foundation, patterns of manipulation or bias related to antisemitism and conflicts with the state of Israel. Jen and Munis: "Many of the people on that committee claimed to be anti censorship during Biden's tenure. The brazen hypocrisy is almost unbearable." Squirrel: "the Israeli regime regime's propaganda complex has dedicated courses and entire teams focused on editing Wikipedia so that it reflects their genocidal worldview." A Nico Haus video argues this is "the exact same thing that Israel themselves have been doing for literal years." Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the ADL, says that Wikipedia just isn't scientist enough for the ADL's life; "18 times more likely a small group of people to communicate in their group communications," tandem editing, and "30 or so people are able to manipulate articles on antisemitism, on Israel, on The Middle East." Naftali Bennett: "Wet'suftiyeh, in conjunction with my Israel, has arranged instruction day for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza Flotilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and, Zionist in their nature." They claim Wikipedia protects Zionists and still omits key facts, such as regarding October 7 or the West Bank, and conclude with a pointed remark about genocide.

Israel and its supporters are globally significant in censoring the Internet to promote their narrative and block facts about Palestine. This is done through orchestrated, well-funded projects utilizing Israeli soldiers, students, and others to infiltrate Wikipedia and influence YouTube. The Israeli military employs soldiers to engage on social media. The National Union of Israeli Students pays students to counter "hostile websites" by creating content, editing Wikipedia, and reporting "antisemitic content." Organizations like CAMRa have been exposed for infiltrating Wikipedia to rewrite Palestinian history. Israeli groups offer workshops on Zionist editing of Wikipedia. Act IL, a project supported by Israel's strategic affairs ministry and intelligence community, uses a software application to organize online activity and recruits Jewish teens and adults, sometimes operating out of Jewish community centers. Israel's Ministry of Strategic Affairs aims to flood the Internet with pro-Israel propaganda, using "tricks and craftiness." Unit 8200, the Israeli military's cyber spy branch, gathers intelligence online. Major Internet companies like Google, YouTube, and Facebook reportedly comply with Israeli requests to delete content. The ADL's online hate index targets content for censorship and considers criticism of Israel to be antisemitism. YouTube plans to use Wikipedia to provide context on conspiracy videos.

An Israel instruction day for wiki editors aims to teach people how to edit Wikipedia, a top information source. The goal is to influence what is written, ensuring it is balanced and Zionist. One participant attended to learn how Israelis and Jews can defend Israel online, particularly on Wikipedia. They had previously tried to edit anti-Israel content but were unsuccessful due to a lack of understanding of Wikipedia's rules. This knowledge is important for defending Israel online by correcting misinformation and ensuring the "right side" of the story is covered. The internet is filled with antisemitism and anti-Zionism, and more effort is needed to counteract it and promote the Israeli perspective. Initiatives to educate and promote the defense of Israel online are extremely important.

In conjunction with My Israel, has arranged a instruction day for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to, teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. 'As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza Flutilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and Zionist in nature.' One speaker says he came to learn how Israelis and Jews can defend Israel online, particularly on Wikipedia, noting that 'Wikipedia is a bit of a complex system' and that his edits 'against Israel' were erased or undone. He asks, 'it's from one side of the story, and I can I have the the power and the right to change that?' He argues online content about Israel is 'filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage' and that 'there's not enough of us out there' to counter it; such initiatives are extremely important, and he ends with 'I hope'.

Netanyahu had been waging a seven front war in the region, and now The United States has become the eighth front. And they wanna prevent anyone from being able to express themselves anywhere in the digital online ecosystem by just buying it all. That truth is being reversed, put on its head by a campaign of lies. Israel is now portrayed as the enemy of Christians. And the enemies of Christians are portrayed as the friends of The United States. The information sphere, the info sphere is the eighth front in this war and seizing the high ground in the fight for global public opinion. If you wouldn't tolerate it if someone's wearing a swastika on their arm, I'm sorry. You shouldn't tolerate it if you're wearing it if you're wearing a confetti.

An instruction day, organized in conjunction with My Israel, aims to teach Wiki editors how to edit in Wikipedia, "the number one source of information today in the world." The goal is to influence what is written about the Gaza flotilla and to ensure that coverage is "balanced and Zionist in nature." A participant says they came to learn "how we, Israelis and as Jews, can defend Israel online on the Internet, and particularly in Wikipedia in this case." They note Wikipedia is "a bit of a complex system" and that "my changes were erased or undone" when attempting to edit content against Israel. The speaker argues this knowledge is important for anyone who wants to defend Israel online, to correct "this isn't quite right," and to counteract what they describe as online content "filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage."

Speaker 0: Wikipedia is a propaganda operation, and one of its founders told me that the CIA or the American intel community is heavily involved in shaping the message, on Wikipedia. Did you come across evidence of that? Speaker 1: On the weaponization working group, as it's described by attorney general Bondi and the president's direction, intelligence community is one of the groups who was weaponized against the people, obviously. It's obvious. The question is, how are we gonna get to the bottom of it? Right? How are gonna get to the bottom of some of the weaponization of the government intelligence community against the citizens? And that's what I that's where I'm going now.

I have been called to join the digital warfare task force, fighting to defend Israel in the media. There is a battle between good and evil, with misinformation, blind hate, anti-Semitism, and lies. We must fight together and stand on the right side of history. Take a bold stand for Israel, and we will win this war. Thank you.

Israel and its supporters are actively involved in censoring the internet by promoting the Israel narrative and blocking information about Palestine and the Israel lobby. They use both independent individuals and well-funded projects sponsored by the Israeli government and pro-Israel groups. These projects involve Israeli soldiers, students, American teens and seniors, and even infiltrating social media groups. Organizations like CAMERA and Unit 8200 play a role in covert internet activity, while major internet companies like Google and Facebook cooperate with Israel to delete content deemed incendiary. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) also targets hate speech and criticism of Israel. Efforts to counter the pro-Palestine movement include mobilizing a pro-Israel network and using Wikipedia to provide companion units of text alongside videos.

The speakers claim Bibi Netanyahu effectively controls the U.S., citing his influence on anti-BDS laws and Trump's policies. They accuse Israel and Zionist groups of censoring dissenting voices online, controlling social media through figures like the head of META censorship, and manipulating information on platforms like Wikipedia. They allege the ADL admitted to controlling social media to promote Zionism. Speakers discuss the Israel lobby's influence on U.S. domestic policy, including attempts to defund states that criticize Israel. They claim textbooks have historically promoted a pro-Israel bias. They accuse Netanyahu of being a psychopath, alleging he uses false flag operations and harms civilians. They criticize Ambassador Huckabee for portraying Israel as humanitarian, citing videos of Israeli violence against children. They also claim PragerU is a Zionist organization created by an IDF unit. Speakers allege a double standard where criticism of Israel is labeled antisemitism, while Israel is allowed to commit atrocities. They claim Israel is expanding its borders and mass murdering Christians. They also allege the CIA and Israel have funded radical Islamist groups. Speakers accuse Mark Levin of being a foreign agent for influencing DHS policy to punish those who criticize Israel. They claim a globalist cabal is centered around Israel. They also discuss Sacha Baron Cohen's ADL gala speech advocating for jailing Mark Zuckerberg. They claim the ADL was founded by gangsters and has a history of suppressing speech. They also allege that many Zionists are descendants of Bolsheviks.

My Israel has arranged an instruction day for Wiki editors to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, the number one source of information today. If someone searches Gaza flotilla, we wanna be there, to influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure it's balanced and Zionist in nature. A participant says they came to learn how Israelis and Jews can defend Israel online, particularly in Wikipedia. They describe Wikipedia as a complex system and note that edits against Israel were erased or undone. They argue this knowledge is important for anyone who wants to defend Israel online, to see when information isn't quite right, to counter one-sided storytelling, and to ensure the other side of the story gets the right coverage. They state that content is filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage, and call for activists to promote defense of Israel.

- Grokopedia is introduced as a new alternative to Wikipedia, built on Elon Musk’s xAI model designed for deep understanding and reasoning, not just regurgitating text. - The program suggests Wikipedia has shifted left over time. It recounts how, ten years ago, Wikipedia was praised as a dream and as a replacement for traditional encyclopedias, with Britannica’s editor deriding encyclopedias as requiring paid researchers, while Wikipedia grew to become the world’s go-to resource and Britannica stopped printing books. - The speakers claim that, although Wikipedia allows anyone to edit, politics on the site is dominated by leftists. They point to examples of editors who advertise socialist views and display images of Che Guevara and Lenin. - They state that Wikipedia’s bias is evident in who counts as reliable or not, asserting that conservative media are deemed unreliable while outlets like CNN, MSNBC, Vox, Slate, The Nation, and Mother Jones are considered reliable. They claim Fox News is treated as unreliable, while Al Jazeera is considered generally reliable. - The narrative asserts bias in topic coverage and notability decisions. They mention a controversy over an article about a Ukrainian refugee that was deleted on the grounds it might not meet notability, contrasting it with other crimes that remained in Wikipedia. They also note a case where a suspect’s name was blacked out because he hadn’t been convicted, but another case (Kyle Rittenhouse) was named despite his status as a minor and not convicted. - The discussion includes claims that public pressure can sway Wikipedia at times (e.g., Irina Zerutsko’s article staying after outcry), but overall “nothing changes.” They describe a group of editors they call the “gang of forty,” who allegedly push propaganda in the Israel-Palestine conflict by removing mentions of terror attacks by Hezbollah and Hamas, and they describe a page titled “Donald Trump and Fascism” created just before a presidential election as interfering with elections. - They argue that Wikipedia presents a single worldview on major topics, excluding other perspectives, citing Fidel Castro’s successor Raul Castro as lacking the term “authoritarian” on his page, while other leaders have such labels applied. They also discuss government censorship and state-controlled outlets influencing Wikipedia’s content, noting that Chinese government censors flood the site and that China runs state propaganda outlets cited tens of thousands of times. - The COVID-19 lab-leak theory is discussed, with the speakers claiming that while evidence later emerged suggesting a lab origin, Wikipedia still claims “no evidence supporting laboratory involvement,” calling it a conspiracy theory. - Grokopedia is presented as offering an alternative where Grok lists investigations that affirm a lab-leak as the most probable origin, and the speaker says Grok is better than Wikipedia on their own page, which they claim contains mistakes and smears on the Wikipedia platform. - They mention other competing projects like Justopedia, founded by a veteran Wikipedia editor who wanted an alternative due to perceived left-wing bias; Scienceopedia and Justopedia are described as gaining momentum to provide more source variety. - The discussion closes with perspectives on governance of Wikipedia’s editorial direction: Catherine Mayer, head of the Wikimedia Foundation, is portrayed as evolving Wikipedia toward a woke and DEI ideology, with Maurer described as shaping critical years starting in 2016 and steering the foundation toward a social justice mission. - The speakers conclude with a call for dedicated, area-specific editors to enter and influence topics, suggesting that a few dozen committed editors could make a difference, though acknowledging the time required.