TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Doctors in Australia have found a potential cure for the coronavirus using a drug called Ivermectin. Although it is typically used for parasitic infections, a study from Monash University showed that even a single dose of Ivermectin could kill the virus in less than 48 hours. The drug is FDA approved, on the World Health Organization's list of essential medicines, and has minimal side effects. It is also inexpensive, costing just 12¢ for a course of treatment. Australian doctor Thomas Borody recommends using Ivermectin in combination with two other drugs, doxycycline and zinc, for maximum effectiveness. Doctors in Broward County, Florida have also reported success in treating coronavirus patients with Ivermectin.

Dr. Oz expresses concern over the politicization of medicine, particularly regarding hydroxychloroquine. He wishes the drug had never been mentioned by politicians. While clinical trials are still underway, a Chinese study showed statistically significant improvement in clinical symptoms and blood markers for inflammation when the drug was administered, though it did not clear the virus. Dr. Oz questions why these findings are being ignored, while other studies with different results are highlighted. He emphasizes the need for honest data presentation, rather than biased headlines. Dr. Oz highlights Georgia's technology-driven approach to managing the virus among first responders, involving easy access to testing and information. He is encouraged by Abbott's plan to produce antibody kits, which could reveal the extent of asymptomatic cases and inform future decisions. He suspects there is a broader asymptomatic population.

I hope they use hydroxychloroquine and Z Pak with doctor's approval. It's been around for a long time, so why not try it? I want to avoid ventilators because the outcomes are not good. Hydroxychloroquine could be a game-changer if it works. It's their choice to take it, but I recommend trying it. Avoid Z Pak if you have a heart condition. Let's keep people off ventilators and find a better solution.

Doctors in Australia have found a potential cure for the coronavirus using a drug called Ivermectin. This medicine, which is already FDA approved and on the World Health Organization's list of essential medicines, has been shown to kill the virus in less than 48 hours. It is safe, widely available, and inexpensive, costing just 12 cents for a course of treatment. When combined with two other drugs, doxycycline and zinc, Ivermectin has been found to be highly effective in treating the virus. Doctors in Broward County, Florida have reported a near 100% success rate in curing coronavirus patients using Ivermectin. However, it remains to be seen how other medical experts will respond to this discovery.

Dr. Richard Urso, an ophthalmologist and part of America's Frontline Doctors, became involved early in the pandemic because he realized there was treatment available for the virus. With a background in drug development, including repurposing drugs and developing a patented FDA-approved drug, he found it unbelievable that patients were left to die without treatment. According to Dr. Urso, the virus causes infection, inflammation, blood clots, and breathing problems. He asserts that doctors know how to treat each of these issues. Therefore, the idea that there was no treatment from the beginning was "science fiction." Any physician claiming otherwise is being hypocritical and violating the Hippocratic Oath. He then transitions to discussing testing and PCR.

Mehmet Oz discusses the coronavirus, stating he's less concerned about a pandemic than an endemic virus that is always present. He believes the virus is mutated, not man-made, and has the right amount of virulence to be contagious without being deadly. Oz expresses concern about rushing a vaccine, citing potential unforeseen consequences, such as affecting fetuses or hastening death in chronically ill individuals. He references data from Korea indicating a lower death rate, questioning the necessity of a risky vaccine if the virus's impact is similar to the flu. Oz says the US government is doing everything possible to address acute issues like hospital beds, ventilators, and testing, but acknowledges there are not enough resources. He urges the public to take preventative measures like social distancing while the government focuses on providing resources and developing vaccines. He advises those with chronic illnesses and those in the 60-80 age group to practice social distancing and avoid major trips.

Speaker 0 argues that the only way to disrupt a virus and reduce its ability to advance so the immune system can finish it off is to use a nasal spray and gargle. He asserts that if a respiratory virus hits, nasal sprays and gargles have the best track record, and that anything can work as long as it’s used twice daily. His preferred option is ClearXLEAR nasal spray with the companion gargle, but he also mentions iodine-based options such as Immune Mist or NeoMed Betadine, as well as hypertonic saline and colloidal silver. He emphasizes that the routine must be performed twice a day. Speaker 0 further explains the infection timeline: you inhale a virus on an airplane, and it resides in your nose for about seven days, where it replicates without you realizing it. It then drains to the throat, leading to a sore throat, and only then do you recognize you have something. By that point, you’re seven days behind the infection. Therefore, the only way to disrupt the virus and reduce its burden enough for the immune system to finish it off is to use a nasal spray and gargle, and he insists that doing this twice daily is super important. He states that he has interviewed people on his show who never had COVID and have remained free of respiratory illnesses for extended periods—five, ten, fifteen years, even one man for twenty years. He asserts that this practice could be a game changer if many people adopted it. Speaker 1 asks whether there is anything society can do to prevent the next outbreak and what people can do to prepare their bodies to fight off future infections. Speaker 0 reiterates his stance that an airborne viral respiratory illness is likely to be the next major threat and that a twice-daily nasal spray and gargle routine is critical for disruption of the virus, enabling the immune system to finish it off. He maintains that if many people adopt this approach, it could be a game changer.

Dr. Oz acknowledges the heavy toll of COVID-19 in the New York/New Jersey area, emphasizing the success of social distancing but cautioning against complacency. He suggests some states with strong leadership and responsible citizens should consider easing restrictions first, learning from countries that prioritized social distancing over complete shutdowns. Dr. Oz highlights the importance of states coordinating supply chain management to avoid shortages. He notes regional differences necessitate tailored approaches, referencing the CDC guidelines and various state coalitions. He stresses that 90% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients have chronic conditions, urging vulnerable populations to remain cautious during reopening phases. Dr. Oz emphasizes personal responsibility in managing chronic illnesses to improve COVID-19 outcomes and facilitate earlier participation in the recovery.

We should not return to our complacency about pandemics. In the future, we can have mega testing platforms that are quick, inexpensive, and can test 20% of the population weekly. Monoclonal antibodies show promise in reducing death rates by 80%. The mRNA platform will make vaccine development faster, easier, and cheaper. To prevent future pandemics, we need a global alert system to detect disease outbreaks worldwide. We also need a group of infectious disease responders, like pandemic firefighters, who can quickly build capacity and respond to new pathogens. This investment is like the best insurance policy the world could buy.

We should not return to our complacency about pandemics. In the future, we can have mega testing platforms that are quick, inexpensive, and can test 20% of the population weekly. Monoclonal antibodies are a promising treatment that can reduce death rates by 80%. The development of new vaccines will be faster, easier, and cheaper thanks to the mRNA platform. To prevent future pandemics, we need a global alert system and a group of infectious disease responders who can act quickly. This investment is like the best insurance policy the world could buy.

The Gates Foundation is redirecting its efforts and funding towards finding therapeutics and vaccines for COVID-19. They are focusing on testing, drug discovery, and vaccine development. While vaccines may take around 18 months to become widely available, therapeutics like manufactured antibodies and using the blood of recovered patients could be available in 4 to 6 months. However, the impact of these interventions on reducing death rates and overloads is uncertain. The foundation is particularly concerned about developing a vaccine that is effective and safe for older people, as they are at higher risk. Safety and efficacy testing across different age groups and demographics is challenging, and governments will need to be involved in the decision to distribute a vaccine worldwide.

The speaker shares their experience with using hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and zinc as a treatment for COVID-19. They mention informing the President of the United States about their protocol and how it was effective in saving lives. However, they criticize Governor Cuomo for blocking access to hydroxychloroquine, leading to their patients dying again. They then discuss finding a substitute called Quercetin, along with vitamin C, that delivers zinc into cells. They explain how they made this treatment more accessible by combining all the necessary ingredients into one pill. They emphasize the importance of early intervention and mention the potential benefits of the treatment for other viruses like influenza and Ebola. The speaker concludes by discussing the creation of ZStack as a solution to help people.

The dialogue centers on treatments and outcomes for COVID-19, with concerns about what is being used and what might work. One participant remarks on the reluctance to use certain treatments that are successful worldwide, recounting a conversation with a doctor. Another asks what kinds of treatments are being tried, noting that some approaches “are coming out with different things that are in the testing phase.” A third person criticizes a platform they believe “kills more people than actually save,” and another agrees that “they don’t work anyway,” questioning the harm in trying alternatives when current efforts aren’t effective. A key exchange discusses expectations for patient survival. One person says, “I don’t expect any of these people to survive. Ninety percent of them would die,” while another adds that if patients are “already dying anyway,” it may be reasonable to try additional measures rather than do nothing. There is debate about whether trying unproven treatments is appropriate; one participant notes that without a scientific basis, extra attempts can make patients worse, while another concedes that they would try anything to save their life. The conversation then shifts to clinical presentations and treatment strategies. With COVID patients who cannot breathe, X-rays show “the lungs are white,” indicating affected lungs with very thick, white secretions. The question arises of what “white lung” means—whether it is mucus and coating that fill the lungs and impede oxygen transfer. In response, the discussion distinguishes between early-stage treatments (like hydroxychloroquine and zinc) and later-stage interventions. It is stated that once lungs are severely affected, certain proven treatments exist that have passed trials in Asia through Dr. Chang, described as a US-board-certified physician. Specifically, extremely high-dose IV vitamin C is claimed to be successful in treating patients, providing the lungs with antioxidant support to help expel the infection, alongside IV antibiotics to treat the infection while avoiding reliance on ventilation and sedation. There is a contrast drawn between approaches in different regions. The dialogue notes that high-dose IV vitamin C has passed three trials in Asia and is reported as effective, while in the speaker’s locale, there is hesitation or reluctance to adopt this method. The discussion ends with a remark about how some people might attribute success to “good genes,” implying a belief that genetics may influence susceptibility or outcomes, though this is stated rather than argued as a scientific conclusion. Overall, the conversation emphasizes that several participants are wary of conventional treatments, advocate for exploring high-dose IV vitamin C as a therapeutic option, and describe the characteristic radiographic and clinical features of severe COVID-19 lung involvement.

Treat COVID at home with zinc, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and other remedies that reduce viral spread. Current protocol delays treatment until hospitalization, using harmful ventilators and remdesivir. Fauci knew remdesivir's dangers from Ebola trials. He manipulated data to make it standard care, causing kidney and heart failure. Many pandemic deaths were due to remdesivir, not the virus.

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko suggests initiating early treatment for moderate to high-risk COVID-19 patients in the outpatient setting, reporting positive results. He mentions the FDA approval of Hydroxychloroquine for various conditions and questions why it was blocked. He then discusses his search for an alternative, finding Quercetin and vitamin C as a substitute for delivering zinc into cells. Dr. Zelenko emphasizes the importance of faith and freedom, advocating for civil disobedience and resistance against potential government overreach. He concludes by highlighting the need for a mature faith in God to overcome fear and uncertainty.