reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There's been some thought given to this issue, and Senator Ron Wyden has already advised on what actions to take. I agree that the Biden administration should ignore this ruling. The courts depend on the legitimacy of their rulings, but they are currently eroding that legitimacy through deeply partisan and unfounded decisions. The justices themselves are undermining their own enforcement power. A ruling depends on enforcement, and the Biden administration has the power to choose whether or not to enforce it.

We will restore the Department of Justice's focus on justice by doubling the civil rights division and directing law enforcement to combat extremism. Social media platforms must be held accountable for the hate that spreads on their sites, as they have a responsibility to protect our democracy. If you profit from hate, amplify misinformation, or fail to regulate your platforms, we will ensure you are held accountable as a community.

Europe has changed dramatically, and there is no freedom of speech anymore. Pavlov, the head of Telegram, was removed from his airplane in France. Thierry Breton, chairman of the European Commission, allegedly threatened Elon Musk with criminal and civil prosecution if he interviewed Donald Trump live on X spaces. Brazil censored Twitter and other social media sites three weeks ago. This rise of censorship and totalitarianism is occurring worldwide. The only hope to prevent that in the U.S. is Donald Trump; otherwise, this is what will happen if Kamala gets in.

Mark Elias stopped posting on X. Brennan has lawyered up. John Kerry made his account private, and Peter Strzok deleted his entire X history. These actions suggest that these individuals feel the walls are closing in. Those who are truly innocent would not be taking these kinds of actions. It's important to declassify information to get the truth out. This information is irrefutable, undeniable, and is currently being reviewed by the Department of Justice to bring about accountability for those involved.

SpaceX is owned by the world's richest person, who has direct control over a global communication system. This person spoke about political retribution and stood next to a candidate who normalizes that language. Elon Musk is allegedly spreading political falsehoods and attacking FEMA while claiming to help hurricane victims. Last year, the owner of Starlink shut down Starlink when a U.S. ally was going to attack an adversary. The head of SpaceX has aggressively injected himself into the presidential race and made his viewpoint clear. SpaceX participated via Zoom. The discussion is about SpaceX increasing launches, not other companies.

The Department of Justice will be put back in the business of justice, and the civil rights division will be doubled. Law enforcement will be directed to counter extremism. Social media platforms will be held accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy. Social media platforms will be held accountable as a community if they profit off of hate, act as a megaphone for misinformation or cyber warfare, or don't police their platforms.

On one of the first days this show aired about the 50 states, a delegation to Israel visited, with people from state and local governments going to Israel, reportedly “humping the wall,” “licking the wall,” listening to speeches from Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli dignitaries, and being given instructions on how they would serve. The discussion then shifts to free speech and second amendment rights, setting the stage for the rest of the show. Jonathan Cagle, an American journalist known on X (formerly Twitter) with accounts such as decent backup, geez, decent JC, has been arrested. He is appearing today in a federal court, facing charges of cyberstalking. The report attributes the arrest to a group of “psychotic Zionists” who have been mass reporting him, attempting to have him kicked off the Internet and from various platforms, filing unpublished and videoed reports, and involving law enforcement. They have accused him of harassing, threatening, and stalking them, and now he faces federal charges. A central question raised is how many reports it takes to get arrested and jailed, and whether a “magic number” exists. The conversation notes X’s new program that flags accounts, suppresses content, and reduces reach, assigning scores (80%, 90%), thereby “snuffing out” visibility. The discussion asks if a coordinated online group can push someone into being arrested, just by accusing them of cyberstalking or other offenses. There is a GoFundMe-style fundraising page linked to Jonathan Cagle’s mother, Lisa Cagle, who states: “I’m Lisa Cagle, and my son needs help with a legal matter as he is a patriot fighting for America's future. He has a platform on X and is joined by so many that share the same passion for the great USA. Any donation is greatly appreciated. We’re raising legal funds to help cover the legal defense of a man facing serious federal charges that raise important questions about free speech, due process, and the proper limits of government power. The case is complex, high stakes, and emotionally taxing, not just for him, but for his family and loved ones. Federal cases move quickly, require specialized legal expertise, and are extremely expensive to defend properly. Without strong representation, the system can overwhelm even those who believe deeply in their innocence. This fundraiser is not about relitigating the case online or attacking anyone involved. It’s about ensuring that every person, regardless of public opinion, has access to a vigorous, competent defense as guaranteed by the constitution. Legal fees for federal defenses can include, and there’s this list here, and I mean, it’s every step of the way. Every contribution, no matter the size, helps ensure that this case is decided in a courtroom based on facts and law, not by financial imbalance or fear. If you’re unable to donate, sharing this page is also deeply appreciated.” The narrative notes that federal court proceedings are challenging due to the government’s resources, and it references the J6 situation, where participants were uprooted from their homes and faced severe sentences, implying a concern about intimidation by federal power. The discussion promises to follow the case and provide updates on the court hearing and further information about what is happening, given the large online attack from accounts on X that have targeted Jonathan to destroy him, making it difficult to discern the facts. The overarching theme is concern over free speech, due process, and the proper limits of government power in the face of online amplification and organized reporting campaigns.

The Department of Justice will be put back in the business of justice, and the civil rights division will be doubled. Law enforcement will be directed to counter extremism. Social media platforms will be held accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy. Social media platforms will be held accountable as a community if they profit off of hate, act as a megaphone for misinformation or cyber warfare, or don't police their platforms.

The Department of Justice will be put back in the business of justice, and the civil rights division will be doubled. Law enforcement will be directed to counter extremism. Social media platforms will be held accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy. Social media platforms will be held accountable as a community if they profit off of hate, act as a megaphone for misinformation or cyber warfare, or don't police their platforms.

He plans to use the Department of Justice against his opponents, remove peaceful protesters, and possibly end the Constitution.

Elon Musk must now confront UK law, potentially facing extradition to answer for inciting division and hatred, which can lead to a prison sentence of up to seven years. Keir Starmer, a skilled lawyer, will not allow foreign figures to undermine the country. As a journalist, my priority is the truth. It's time to shut down X and eliminate the spread of misinformation. We need reliable, fact-checked media sources, not a wealthy tech entrepreneur in Texas who prioritizes rockets over global hunger. Elon Musk, your time is running out.

Elon Musk is criticized for turning X (formerly Twitter) into a "cesspool" or "shithole" of hate speech, disinformation, and extremist content, particularly against women. Musk is described as a joke, dangerously weird, dumb, and crazy, with comparisons made to a Bond villain. Some suggest he is a narcissist with a thin skin, blaming Jews for the platform's destruction. Concerns are raised about the platform's decline, potential bankruptcy, and mass exodus of users. Musk is accused of spreading lies that justify violence, contaminating the platform, and being a far-right activist using X as a political project. Some believe Musk is spreading misinformation, impacting society negatively, and making people dumb and hateful. Accusations are made that he is a pawn of Vladimir Putin and the most important pro-Russian propagandist in American politics. Advertisers are urged to withdraw from X, and action from Congress is anticipated to clean up the app.

Earlier this week, Elon Musk filed a lawsuit against an organization, alleging they caused advertisers to leave X. The organization sets guidelines around the type of content an ad can appear next to. They are now dissolving because they lack the resources to fight the lawsuit, which is a tactic Musk has used before against organizations that found harmful content on X. Misinformation is circulating regarding the war between Israel and Hamas and The UK riots. Social media platforms may eventually catch, label, or remove the misinformation, but only after it has already received millions of views. Musk shared a fake article from the Telegraph about The UK riots that got almost 2,000,000 views before it was deleted by the original creator.

I believe President Biden is a much worse threat to democracy than Trump. Biden is the first president to use federal agencies to censor political speech, targeting opponents. I won a case proving he censored me shortly after taking office. The greatest threat to democracy isn't questioning election returns, but using presidential power to force social media companies like Facebook and Twitter to censor political critics through portals accessible to the FBI, CIA, IRS, and other agencies. Biden also weaponized the Secret Service, denying protection to a political opponent for political reasons. These are critical threats because he is weaponizing federal agencies.

Letitia James poses an existential threat. She’s the “queen of lawfare,” wielding significant power in New York City. With a left-leaning media, jury pool, and judges, she can easily bring bogus criminal charges. This is a serious threat to President Trump and his associates, including Elon Musk and others. I'm calling on Attorney General Pam Bondi to launch a criminal investigation into James and Alvin Bragg for their actions against President Trump. Trump himself has highlighted James as a major threat. This out-of-control situation demands immediate attention.

The speaker claims that individuals from the Biden administration would call and berate their team about certain documents. The speaker says that emails related to this are published. The speaker states that their team refused to take down content that was true, including a meme about potential class action lawsuits related to COVID vaccines. They also refused to remove humor and satire. The speaker alleges that President Biden made a statement suggesting "these guys are killing people," after which various government agencies began investigating their company, which they describe as "brutal."

The tech billionaire is a social media figure with no social conscience, and he should face serious consequences for spreading harmful ideologies. There's a keen interest in how the U.S. will handle TikTok, as efforts are underway to eliminate such platforms. If it means shutting down harmful influences, then it's worth pursuing. I plan to deactivate my account on X today, and I urge the other 226 members of parliament to do the same. Leading by example is crucial, and it's time to take a stand against these platforms.

To protect social media companies from government pressure to censor content, an incoming administration could issue an executive order on day one. This order would prohibit government grants and contracts to any private company or nonprofit involved in domestic disinformation. It effectively addresses the issue of government-funded censorship. By targeting grants and contracts across various agencies, this approach could dismantle the censorship industry, which has grown significantly since the 2016 election. Today, many individuals rely on this industry for their livelihoods, a situation that emerged in response to the political landscape following Trump's victory.

California DOJ agents raided my home after I exposed Planned Parenthood's involvement in fetal trafficking. Kamala Harris, at Planned Parenthood's behest, targeted me to silence the truth. Planned Parenthood wanted my video equipment seized to stop me from exposing their actions. Harris poses a grave threat to First Amendment rights, willing to use power to suppress dissenting voices. If elected, she will undermine civil liberties in the highest office.

Lawfare is expected to increase, with Elon Musk being a primary target. The California Coastal Commission's decision to halt additional launches from Vandenberg due to Musk's political tweets is seen as an example of this. While the commission may not have unilateral authority, using political tweets to influence decisions about SpaceX's progress is considered wrong. This action is viewed as an admission that lawfare against SpaceX and Musk is politically motivated. It's argued that government agencies are being used to punish political opponents, and this will continue without consequences.

Censorship remains a pressing issue, especially with recent events in Brazil and the blocking of X. There are concerns about potential repercussions for past censorship actions. Mark Zuckerberg acknowledged being pressured by the FBI, raising questions about accountability. If elected, there will be a commitment to fire those responsible for censorship, including those who misled tech companies like Zuckerberg. This includes the intelligence operatives who falsely labeled the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian disinformation. It's essential to strip these individuals of their security clearances and hold them accountable for lying to the public for political gain. Disgraceful actions must have consequences.

The Biden administration's team aggressively pressured us to remove content, often resorting to yelling and cursing. Despite their demands, we refused to take down truthful posts, including a meme about potential compensation for COVID vaccine recipients. We stood firm against removing humor and satire. Eventually, Biden publicly accused us of causing harm, which led to various government agencies investigating our company. The situation became extremely challenging for us.

The speaker discusses the current "transatlantic flank attack 2.0" strategy, where state department exiles are working with the EU to pass censorship laws. The EU Digital Services Act, crafted with input from figures like Michael Hayden and Tom Ridge, poses a major threat to freedom of speech. X faces the choice of forfeiting revenue or implementing internal censorship mechanisms to comply with the law. This battle against censorship from Europe is a significant challenge for X.

Two main strategies will emerge for censorship in a post-Trump era: state and global. The state strategy involves new laws in blue states like California and New York, aimed at restricting social media content and creating market disruptions. This will push compliant tech companies to the forefront while limiting access to platforms that support free speech. The global strategy mirrors the post-2016 election response, where former officials will leverage their connections to influence foreign governments into imposing censorship on American companies hosting pro-Trump content. This will lead to a battle between the Trump administration's diplomatic efforts and the censorship initiatives from civil society groups aligned with the previous administration.

Right now, Democrats are too focused on Elon Musk. He's popular and controls the largest platform, X, formerly Twitter. We're missing an opportunity here. Instead of pathetically trying to fight against something that's clearly overpowering us, we should join in. By participating, we could actually influence the strategy instead of being steamrolled.