reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There are people who do not want to comply and get vaccinated, and we have to get them vaccinated. Hopefully, they will do it willingly. If not, there will have to be things that will essentially put pressure on them. For example, you're not going to work in this particular agency or institution, or go to this college or university unless you get vaccinated. Once we start doing that, you will see more and more people willingly get vaccinated.

Dutch summary: De spreker streeft naar zoveel mogelijk gevaccineerd, en ziet overtuigen als beste methode. Hij noemt een macro-methode: 'Als miljoenen mensen hun verantwoordelijkheid nemen, en als miljoenen mensen zeggen: Ik doe dat om mezelf te beschermen en om de mensen om me heen te beschermen, dan je op een bepaald moment wel aan iedereen zeggen: We vragen u ook wel uw verantwoordelijkheid te nemen.' Verder pleit hij voor beleid met een vaccinatiepas of maatregelen: 'wie niet veilig is, kan niet zomaar in het openbaar leven rondlopen' en 'de vrijheid van die persoon brengt jou vrijheid, namelijk jouw gezondheid, jouw mogelijkheid om gezond in het leven te kunnen staan.' 'In gevaar, ja, dat kan je niet aanvaarden.' English translation: The speaker aims for as many people to be vaccinated as possible and sees persuasion as the best method. He cites a macro-method: 'If millions of people take responsibility, and if millions say: I do this to protect myself and to protect the people around me, then at some point you should tell everyone: We also ask you to take your responsibility.' He also endorses policy with a vaccination passport or measures: 'those who are not safe cannot simply walk around in public' and 'the freedom of that person brings you freedom, namely your health, your ability to live healthily.' 'In danger, yes, you cannot accept that.'

We will collaborate with provinces and territories to implement vaccination certifications or passports for safety. The federal government will fund the creation of privileges for vaccinated individuals, as it is crucial for everyone to get vaccinated. Those who choose not to get vaccinated pose a risk to all of us.

Dutch (orig): De spreker stelt dat de doelstelling is: zo veel mogelijk mensen gevaccineerd krijgen. De beste manier is volgens hem mensen te overtuigen, maar hij erkent ook dat hij de macro-methode kan toepassen. Als miljoenen mensen hun verantwoordelijkheid nemen en zeggen: "Ik doe dat om mezelf te beschermen en om de mensen om me heen te beschermen", dan kun je op een gegeven moment iedereen vragen: "We vragen u ook wel uw verantwoordelijkheid te nemen." Dat impliceert volgens hem het gebruik van een vaccinatiepas of het idee dat "wie niet veilig is, kan niet zomaar in het openbaar leven rondlopen" en dat iemand niet kan stellen: "het is voor mij vrijheid", omdat "de vrijheid van die persoon brengt jou vrijheid, namelijk jouw gezondheid, jouw mogelijkheid om gezond in het leven te kunnen staan." In gevaar, ja, dat kan je niet aanvaarden. English translation: The speaker states the goal is to vaccinate as many people as possible. He believes the best way is to persuade, but he also acknowledges that he can apply the macro method. If millions of people take responsibility and say: "I do that to protect myself and to protect the people around me," then at some point you can tell everyone: "We ask you to take responsibility as well." That, according to him, implies the use of a vaccination passport or the idea that "who is not safe, cannot simply roam in public life" and that someone cannot claim: "it is for me freedom," because "the freedom of that person brings you freedom, namely your health, your ability to live healthily." In danger, yes, you cannot accept.

I have no resentment towards the unvaccinated, but we can still expect something from them. We have all made sacrifices for so long, with restrictions on contact, gastronomy, and businesses, as well as the financial resources we have invested. I believe that we can ask the unvaccinated to accept a nearly side-effect-free vaccine that is scientifically undisputed. I see myself as old-fashioned in this regard, in the tradition of enlightenment and the duty of Kant. If everyone were to think this way, we would end up in chaos.

Vaccines have a place, but the population has been scared into accepting them. It's frustrating that vaccines are being promoted as gene therapy to children who are not at risk. It's ethically questionable to recommend something dangerous to a certain group to protect the elderly. Personally, as a 70-year-old, I don't want young people getting vaccinated for my sake. If something happened to them, I would feel guilty.

Vaccination will always be a choice, and there will not be a two-tier society. The idea of a vaccination passport should be approached with caution, as it may create implicit pressure. Companies or organizations cannot enforce vaccination. There should be no indirect vaccination requirement, and no disadvantages or advantages for those who choose not to vaccinate or have already been vaccinated. People should never feel compelled to prove their vaccination status, and it should be legally impossible to use it as a requirement. Voluntary means voluntary, and it should not become mandatory through other means.

Millions of people have received their first vaccination, including those under 50 with underlying health issues. The speaker believes that showing proof of vaccination or a negative test should allow people to enjoy activities like going to the theater or watching sports. They think it could also encourage more people to get vaccinated. When asked about compulsory vaccination, the speaker doesn't want unvaccinated individuals near them and suggests they stay at home. They believe the government has an obligation to keep the majority, including 15 million pensioners, safe.

Speaker 0: I ask all citizens to hold on a little longer. But until everyone is vaccinated, there will be no easing of restrictions, that is not the path we are aiming for. Speaker 1: Yesterday, you said that as long as not everyone can be offered a vaccine, there will be no new freedoms, we are talking about old freedoms. How do you plan to keep the vaccinated, let's say, in check, so that they don't start traveling, meeting up, or partying again? How long do you intend to enforce this strictly? Speaker 0: Well, I was asked about the wrong word, which I have already used, privileges, you didn't mention that. Because we must not get used to the normal life, as we know it with other freedoms, that life is no longer normal. That's where we want to go back to. These are fundamental rights that everyone has. But at the moment, even if someone is vaccinated, it is not clear whether they can still infect other people. And as long as that is not clarified, we cannot have any special measures or rights in addition to the normal rights for which the wave of lawsuits is demanding, and they are right. Look, there are now many lawsuits from people who want to be vaccinated in the highest priority group. There are lawsuits about the fairness of the measures. There will be lawsuits about the question of rights for the vaccinated, that is part of the rule of law and as politicians, we must argue why we are doing something, why we are not doing something. I believe that if we have been able to offer vaccination to a large number of people later on, and then some people say, we don't have mandatory vaccination, now I don't want to be vaccinated, then maybe we have to make such distinctions and say, okay, if you don't want it, then you may not be able to do certain things. Speaker 1: Chancellor, you explicitly mentioned the 21st of September yesterday. By then, there should be a vaccination offer for everyone. That is, if you look at the calendar, five days before the federal election. That date was not a coincidence, right? Speaker 0: Look, that is the meteorological beginning of autumn.

I don't have a specific target number, but last year's death toll from Covid was too high. We have a collective responsibility towards vulnerable individuals. I want to convince those listening to get vaccinated. Our vaccine is more effective than last year's, it targets the current strains, and we have three years of data showing no side effects. It's important to go for it. There is a global push for prevention and vaccination, including for HPV, bronchiolitis, flu, and Covid. I believe in the progress and effectiveness of prevention and vaccination.

People need to prioritize the greater good over personal beliefs. Unvaccinated individuals should face consequences like fines, reduced benefits, and higher insurance premiums. It's crucial for everyone to be vaccinated to protect vulnerable populations and prevent overwhelming the healthcare system. Collaboration and unity are essential in the fight against COVID-19.

Speaker 0: Mandatory vaccination is nonsense. No one in Germany will be forced to get vaccinated against their will. The idea that those who choose not to get vaccinated should lose their basic rights is also absurd and malicious. Let's remember the experiences we've had in Germany and reject such claims. Personally, I am open to technological and medical advancements. If German authorities approve a vaccine, I would be one of the first to get vaccinated. However, I will also advocate for the freedom of those who choose not to, as they should not be forced into it.

I believe it's important to offer incentives to those who are hesitant about getting vaccinated. We don't need to convince every single person individually. The problem lies with those who hesitate, and we need to address that. It's crucial to emphasize that the vaccines are mostly free of side effects. Those who refuse to get vaccinated have been victims of misinformation on social media and exploitation by political forces. We need to reach out to them as well.

I don't have a specific target number, but last year's number of vaccinations was too low. We have a collective responsibility towards vulnerable individuals, as there were deaths from Covid last year. We can't force people, but I want to convince listeners to get vaccinated. Our vaccine is more effective than last year's, it matches the current strains, and we have three years of data showing no side effects. We need to go for it, especially considering the global climate of focusing on prevention and vaccination for various illnesses. I believe in showing that vaccination is progress and it works.

Some individuals are turning their freedom into irresponsibility, endangering the lives of others and restricting their freedom. The unvaccinated should be treated as outcasts and forced to get vaccinated. Those who protest against vaccination are foolish. Non-vaccinated individuals should not receive unemployment benefits. Vaccination should be mandatory, and non-vaccinated individuals should be visited by authorities and informed of the consequences. Those who spread misinformation should be arrested. The real battles are climate change and equality, not protesting vaccine passports. Those who refuse vaccination should face consequences and not burden the healthcare system. Anti-vaxxers are trying to disrupt the system. Most French citizens have used their brains and got vaccinated, unlike the anti-vaxxers.

If you and your friends had just gotten vaccinated like most of us did, we would all be free by now. I demand payback. We have found something that can protect us, so I want my freedom back. And not just temporarily, because some people are shouting "Freedom Day" now. The real burden is not having a vaccine mandate, it's not having one. It's a burden for the majority who are being responsible. Everyone, regardless of age, spreads the virus more if they're unvaccinated. We can't rely on cosmetic measures anymore. We need herd immunity. I urge you to get vaccinated for the sake of children, teenagers, and our freedom. I fight for a universal vaccine mandate for adults because it can't be an individual decision anymore. It's not.

Everyone should have the option to get vaccinated. If someone chooses not to get vaccinated, they shouldn't be forced to, although it's unlikely. However, there should be consequences for not getting vaccinated. It's not fair for those who do get vaccinated to face disadvantages while others don't. Being fair means that those who get vaccinated protect themselves and others. Vaccination prevents the spread of the virus, and as a result, life should return to normal as much as possible for those who are vaccinated and for a certain number of vaccinated individuals. That's why I believe vaccine certificates are important, not just for travel within Europe, but also for everyday life in the long run.

De doelstelling is zoveel mogelijk mensen gevaccineerd krijgen, het liefst door overtuiging. Ook kan de macro-methode toegepast worden: als miljoenen verantwoordelijkheid nemen en zeggen: 'Ik doe dat om mezelf te beschermen en om de mensen om me heen te beschermen', dan kun je aan iedereen vragen: 'We vragen u ook wel uw verantwoordelijkheid te nemen.' Dit betekent het gebruik van een vaccinatiepas of dat wie niet veilig is, niet zomaar in het openbaar leven kan rondlopen; vrijheid van de ene mens mag de ander niet in gevaar brengen. As many people as possible should be vaccinated, the objective, best achieved by persuasion. The macro-method: if millions take responsibility and say, 'I do this to protect myself and the people around me,' then you tell everyone: 'We also ask you to take your responsibility.' This implies a vaccination passport; without safety, one person's freedom threatens others’ health.

We need to argue as politicians why we do or don't do something. If we have offered many people the opportunity to get vaccinated and some refuse, we may need to make distinctions and say that those who don't want to be vaccinated may not be able to do certain things.

The most important freedom we have is the freedom to get vaccinated. Vaccination protects you from severe illness and death, and it protects your family and community. Slowing the spread of the virus is crucial right now so we can achieve high vaccination coverage. That remains the primary goal.

The government encourages vaccination. If you choose not to get vaccinated, you can't travel with vaccinated people and endanger them. We must stand firm in our decisions.

I said that the people who died should have been vaccinated. They were the ones we know are at risk. It's a true public health priority to prioritize them and take action, both collectively and individually.

I get vaccinated not just for myself, but to protect others. It's not a freedom issue, it's about keeping people safe. It's like not being allowed to drink and drive.

We should distinguish between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, granting more freedom to the vaccinated. It's crucial to incentivize vaccination as it reduces transmission, hospitalization, and death risk. Refusing the vaccine without a valid medical reason is not acceptable.

I support mandatory vaccines for everyone. It's about looking out for each other. People talk about freedom, but we need to protect each other. Just like we did with polio.