TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker will be actively campaigning and believes President Trump will announce other Democrats joining his campaign. The speaker and President Trump both want to make America healthy again. The speaker discussed pharmaceutical company shareholder value with President Trump, who said his legacy would be healthy children and that he was unconcerned about other implications.

"You were the driving force behind Operation Warp Speed, these mRNA vaccines that are the gold standard. Now your health secretary is pulling back all the funding for research. He's saying that the risks outweigh the benefits, which puts him at odds with the entire medical community and with you. What is going on? Research on what? Into mRNA vaccines. Well, we're gonna look at that. We're talking about it, and they're doing a very good job. With Operation Warp Speed was, whether you're Republican or Democrat, considered one of the most incredible things ever done in this country. The efficiency, the the way it was done, the distribution, everything about it was has been amazing. But, you know, that was, now a long time ago, and we're on to other things. But we are speaking about it. We have meetings about it tomorrow, actually, tomorrow at 12:00, and we'll determine. We're looking for other answers to other problems, to other sicknesses or diseases, and I think we're doing really well. Like you, mister president."

I met with Donald Trump for an intriguing three-hour dinner, along with his chief of staff and my manager. We discussed various topics, particularly global health, where I shared updates on our foundation's work towards an HIV cure and the potential for accelerated vaccine innovation similar to what was done during COVID. We also talked about polio eradication efforts, emphasizing the challenges in regions like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Gaza, and Africa. Trump showed a keen interest in how he could help achieve significant milestones in these areas over the next four years. I was impressed by his enthusiasm and willingness to engage with the issues I presented.

If we're gonna make America healthy again, we can't allow public health to be undermined. So could you explain what steps you're gonna be taking to ensure vaccine guidance is clear, evidence based, and trustworthy? We're going to make it clear evidence based and trustworthy for the first time in history. Only one of those 19 vaccines, 92 doses, only one of those vaccines has ever been tested against an inert placebo. And what we're doing now is any new vaccine that before it's approved and licensed will have to show demonstrate safety against inert placebo. And we're going to go back and do observational studies on the existing vaccines to see if they're linked to any of these chronic disease epidemics so that people can understand the risk profile of those products and make good assessments for their own health.

I signed an executive order last Thursday to establish the Maha Commission. We'll be studying the reasons behind the decline in American health over the last two generations. We will bring together representatives from all perspectives to investigate the rise in chronic diseases. We will investigate many potential factors, like childhood vaccine schedules, electromagnetic radiation, glyphosate and other pesticides, ultra-processed foods and additives, psychiatric drugs, microplastics, and more. Nothing is off limits. I'm willing to subject all my past beliefs to unbiased scientific scrutiny. We will use unbiased science to guide us, and our goal is to commission research that satisfies all stakeholders. We will agree on protocols in advance and avoid altering study outcomes midway. Let's depoliticize these issues, find common ground, and renew our search for truth without political barriers or preconceptions.

You mentioned wanting to eliminate 600 NIH workers on day one and 2,200 from HHS. Which departments will you cut from? There are 200 political appointees that change with each administration. If you remove those, will you replace them with your appointees? President Biden changed 3,000 employees at HHS. As a potential top health official, will you commit to not firing federal employees working on food safety or cyber protection? There are 91,000 employees. So, will you ensure those working on food safety and cyber security keep their jobs? I commit not to fire anyone doing their job. Will this commitment be based on your opinion or political agenda? It will be based on my opinion. So, it seems those with differing views on vaccines may be at risk of losing their jobs.

Paul Offit said that I'm going to do everything I can to make vaccines less available and affordable, which will hurt the vaccine infrastructure in this country. I'm supposedly joining hands with Donald Trump to march into measles land. But I'm not going to take away anyone's vaccines. People should be able to get them if they want. I want to give people good science. We don't have good safety studies on almost any of the 72 vaccines mandated for children. HHS admitted there are no pre-licensing safety studies for any of them, except the COVID vaccine. We need to know the risk profiles of these products. We also don't have good data on adverse effects from the COVID vaccine, which is a crime. The CDC's surveillance system captures less than one percent of vaccine injuries. Congress and the National Academy of Sciences have repeatedly ordered the CDC to put together a better vaccine. We will do that right away.

Minister Farrakhan requested me to discuss African American vaccine safety. I want to emphasize that I am strongly in favor of vaccines. I vaccinated all of my 6 children and support policies promoting vaccination for all Americans.

We aim to reverse the chronic disease epidemic and restore the nation's health. The very people dictating our food production and healthcare are those who instigated the crisis in the first place. Many defending this system and pharmaceutical profits are heavily funded. I was asked to clean up corruption and conflict. If confirmed, I recognize the CDC's critical role for Georgia, our country, and global health. Concerns have been raised regarding my previous promotion of "junk science" and potential conflicts of interest due to book deals and vaccine-related lawsuits. People need assurance that I can be independent and science-based. I will support vaccine development and distribution if the evidence supports it. I am aware of vaccine safety data resources, but question the accessibility and integrity of the data.

In 2016 and again in March 2017 at the White House, the speaker met with someone who considered forming a commission to investigate the potential negative effects of vaccines. This individual was being advised by Robert Kennedy, Jr., who claimed vaccines were causing harm. The speaker advised against this course of action, stating that it would be a mistake.

President Trump allegedly told the speaker that he wanted healthy children, chemicals removed from food, and regulatory agencies free from corporate corruption.

You have raised concerns about Robert Kennedy's potential influence on vaccines and vaccine manufacturing. While you emphasize the importance of following scientific guidelines, there are fears that Kennedy could undermine access to vaccines, which could have serious consequences for children's health. Despite his assurances, there is skepticism about his commitment to supporting vaccinations. You assert that Kennedy could profit significantly while jeopardizing public health, leading to tragic outcomes for children. In response, you affirm your support for vaccines and the childhood vaccination schedule.

I will comply with all ethical guidelines. However, you are implying that I should not challenge backseat decisions. As Secretary of HHS, Robert Kennedy could undermine vaccines and their manufacturing, potentially profiting while risking children's health. I support vaccines and the childhood schedule, but I prioritize good science. You should clarify that Kennedy has undergone the same ethics review as other nominees and has signed an ethics letter regarding conflicts of interest. While concerns about his financial interests are raised, he has complied with all applicable laws. I cannot confirm if any previous nominee has made millions from suing entities they would regulate, but all nominees face scrutiny over their financial interests, and Kennedy has met the necessary requirements.

I had a long, intriguing dinner with Donald Trump, lasting over three hours, along with his chief of staff and my manager. We discussed various topics, particularly global health, where I shared updates on our work towards an HIV cure and the potential for accelerated vaccine innovation, similar to what was done during COVID. We also talked about the progress on polio eradication and the challenges in regions like Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Gaza. Trump was engaged and interested in how he could contribute to achieving significant health milestones in the next four years. I was impressed with his enthusiasm for the issues we discussed.

I want to clarify my stance on vaccines. First, vaccines, like all drugs, have side effects that can harm some individuals. There's no vaccine that is universally safe and effective for everyone. Vaccine injuries deserve attention, just like rare diseases. The public health community has often ignored concerns about vaccine side effects, which is disappointing. I believe vaccine manufacturers should be held legally accountable for their products, as they currently have immunity from lawsuits. Additionally, individuals must have the freedom to choose what goes into their bodies. The Nuremberg Code emphasizes informed consent, which is crucial. As president, I will ensure vaccines are safer, hold the industry accountable, and protect personal choice. If you support these ideas, visit Kennedy24.com to learn more about my plans.

"we'll we'll find an incredible nominee. I'm not worried about that at all." "the CDC's credibility was shattered during the COVID era." "This is now widely understood and widely acknowledged." "CDC used to be, of course, or seen widely around the world as a premier health agency." "Secretary Kennedy, one of the world's foremost voices, advocates, experts on public health, is working hard to restore the credibility and the integrity of CDC." "It is an honor to be able to work with secretary Kennedy as he tackles these issues on behalf of president Trump." "Secretary Kennedy has been a crown jewel of this administration who's working tirelessly to improve public health for all Americans and, again, to deal with the drivers of the chronic health crisis in this country."

I spoke with a congressperson who mentioned getting Guillain Barre from a flu vaccine. When discussing vaccination, it's crucial to address concerns and focus on the benefits, data, and safety of the COVID vaccine. Listening to people's worries is essential.

Key points discuss alleged vaccine safety concerns and political influence. An anecdote describes a two-year-old who “went to have the vaccine and came back and a week later got a tremendous fever, got very, very sick, now is autistic.” “President-elect Trump was very thoughtful on the issue. He asked the chair commission on vaccine safety.” “Vaccine safety.” The plan was to “chair and to assemble a vaccine safety committee that would look at the safety of the various vaccinations.” In March 2017, there was talk in the White House about whether “vaccines weren't a bad thing” with Robert Kennedy Jr. advising against it, to which the speaker replied, “no. That's a dead end. That would be a bad thing. Don't do that.” Finally, it is claimed Trump took “a million dollar contribution for his inaugural party from Pfizer” and appointed “Alex Azar and Scott Utley,” “Pfizer's handpicked candidates,” who “killed the vaccine safety commission.”

There are concerns that discrediting public health officials could lead to a lack of trust in vaccines, similar to what is happening in Russia. Attacks on me are attacks on science, as everything I have said is based on scientific evidence. It is clear that science and the truth are under attack.

I have 7 kids, and 5 of them have allergies. I was asked by Donald Trump to serve on a vaccine safety commission in 2016. During a meeting, I asked if there was any vaccine that had been tested for safety, but they couldn't provide any evidence. So, I sued them to show us a study on vaccine safety testing, but they said they didn't have any.

I'm asking if you will agree not to sue drug companies. I'm not agreeing to that. As secretary of HHS, you could influence lawsuits in many ways, such as promoting anti-vaccine views, appointing like-minded individuals, or changing vaccine schedules and compensation rules. You could even share FDA data with law firms for their benefit. I'm asking you to commit not to financially benefit from these lawsuits while serving as secretary. I will comply with ethical guidelines. You're trying to undermine vaccines. As secretary, you could harm vaccine access while profiting from it. I support vaccines and the childhood schedule; I just want good science. Then say you won't profit from your role as secretary.

My responsibility is to assess your trustworthiness in supporting public health. We share concerns about issues like ultra-processed food and obesity, and I understand parents want reassurance about vaccine safety and effectiveness. However, our approaches differ; I rely on the preponderance of evidence, while you seem to use selective evidence to create doubt. As a 71-year-old who has long criticized vaccines, can you change your stance now that you hold a key position in vaccine policy? Your declaration that vaccines are safe could significantly impact public trust. Politically, as a Republican from Louisiana, I want President Trump's policies to succeed. If someone remains unvaccinated due to your influence and dies from a vaccine-preventable disease, it would not only be a tragedy but also tarnish the President's legacy, which I hope to see shine.

I had an intriguing dinner with Donald Trump, lasting over three hours, along with his chief of staff and my manager. We discussed various topics, particularly global health. I shared updates on our foundation's work towards an HIV cure and suggested that we could replicate the rapid vaccine innovation seen during COVID. We also talked about polio eradication efforts, highlighting challenges in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Gaza, and Africa. Trump was interested in how he could contribute to achieving significant health milestones in the next four years. I was impressed by his enthusiasm and engagement with the issues I presented.

One major controversy in your candidacy is your stance on childhood vaccines, which many medical organizations deem safe and effective. An audience member highlights that vaccines have eradicated diseases like chicken pox and polio and expresses concern about your message potentially endangering public health. You clarify that you are not anti-vaccine but believe vaccines should undergo safety testing like other medications. You argue that none of the 72 mandated vaccine doses for children have been subjected to prelicensing placebo-controlled trials. You recount a meeting with Dr. Fauci, where you requested evidence of such studies, but none was provided. You assert that without these safety studies, the long-term risks of vaccines remain unknown.

I met Donald Trump at Trump Tower before he was elected. We discussed the importance of driving innovation in areas like energy, health, and education. He later asked me about vaccines, considering a commission to investigate their ill effects based on advice from Robert Kennedy Jr. I advised against it, stating it would be a bad idea.