reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses concern about the government's handling of FEMA funding and warns against signing property over to FEMA, citing past disasters as evidence of a potential scam. They recount their experience trying to find a shelter for people in need, highlighting the chaos and lack of assistance from government agencies. The speaker praises the locals who are actively helping those in need and urges viewers to share the message that the truth is being withheld. They mention being in Maui and offer to provide updates on the situation.

There was a police barricade blocking the street, trapping people in their cars. Water was shut off and firefighters couldn't save homes. School was cancelled. The speaker, a Hawaii native, urges people to keep talking about the situation and share videos to raise awareness. They claim that the news and social media posts are not showing the true extent of the crisis. The speaker believes that the media is spreading false information and trying to create division. They express concern that supplies are not being distributed properly and predict that rebuilding will be made difficult and expensive. They also fear that corporations and realtors will take advantage of the situation to buy up land. The speaker pleads for continued spreading of information and urges people to use their voices to make a difference.

The speaker expresses surprise at the media's lack of interest in the Maui incident, suggesting that there is a hidden story. They question the coincidence of the police chief's involvement in both the Maui incident and the Las Vegas massacre. They also mention that the media has not interviewed any grieving parents or children affected by the incident. The speaker highlights several coincidences, such as the silent emergency sirens, the water being turned off, and the blocking of streets during the fire. They mention the governor's emergency proclamation, the black fence around Lahaina, and the restriction on drones flying over the affected areas. The speaker suggests a connection between these coincidences and plans to make Maui a smart city. They also mention the eviction of locals whose homes were not affected by the fire and the fact that fact-checkers are owned by BlackRock.

The speaker expresses concern about abuse of power by the police and the support for terrorist organizations. They argue for the importance of freedom of the press and criticize the media's biased reporting. The speaker engages in a heated exchange with a police officer who asks for their personal information. The officer claims the speaker's presence may cause distress to others. The speaker refutes this and questions why the police don't take action against those who support terrorism. The police eventually disperse the speaker, citing potential harassment and distress to attendees. The speaker argues for their right to report as a journalist and criticizes the police's actions.

The speaker expresses surprise at the media's lack of interest in the Maui incident. They suggest that the true story, which the media is not allowed to tell, involves the Police Chief's connection to the Las Vegas massacre and the untouched property of billionaires while locals' homes burned. Another speaker points out the media's failure to interview grieving parents, children, or schools. The first speaker questions the coincidences surrounding the fire, such as the silent emergency sirens, the water being turned off, and the police blocking escape routes. They also mention the governor's emergency proclamation, the black fence around Lahaina, the drone ban, and plans for a smart city. The speaker concludes by mentioning the fact checkers' ownership by BlackRock.

In this video, the speaker, a Hawaii native, expresses concern about the lack of attention and support for the recent crisis in Maui. They urge viewers to keep talking about it, sharing videos, and commenting on posts to raise awareness. The speaker believes that the media is providing false information and trying to create division. They also suggest that supplies are not being distributed properly and that rebuilding efforts will be hindered by high prices. The speaker warns against the potential loss of land to corporations and calls for continued activism and spreading of information to ensure that the world knows about the situation in Maui.

The speaker expresses concern about the heavy situation and requests soil samples to be taken. They accuse the state of wanting the land and using natural disasters as an excuse to take it. Another speaker emphasizes the impact on people and questions the classification of the event as a natural disaster. They mention the connection to Lahaina and express their opposition to AI control and smart cities. They believe the incident was a planned attack and criticize the use of the term "conspiracy theorist." The speaker calls for unity and fighting for people's rights. The meeting moderator interrupts, but the speaker dismisses their agenda. The video ends abruptly.

The speaker is leaving Maui and describes the empty airport due to the shutdown. They express relief to be leaving and mention the difficulties they faced during the past month. They explain that despite the natural beauty of the island, they didn't feel free and were unable to do their job due to restrictions. They criticize the government's control over the population and the lack of opportunities compared to the mainland. The speaker encourages viewers to follow them on multiple platforms to avoid censorship. They also mention a fake profile created by a hater and express relief that they were not the target of violence. The speaker promises to share more details after leaving the island.

The transcript follows a chaotic exchange among multiple speakers discussing information sources, political narratives, and protests, with several recurring themes and claims. - There is a pattern of questioning information sources and personal actions. Speakers repeatedly ask, “Who the fuck is Jeremy? Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke?” and “Who the fuck is Jonathan? Where does he get his information? Why did he delete karaoke?” indicating a concern with source credibility and content deletion. - A speaker (Speaker 2) describes a sense of purpose from sharing information, claiming that Wisconsin was the first state where “the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter, Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, you know, under oath in, you know, a senate… Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity.” -Jeremy Oliver (Speaker 3) promotes alternative information channels, stating he has a YouTube page, a personal Facebook page, and that viewers can see “at the last protesting.” He frames mainstream media as unreliable, promising to “stream live and show exactly what's going on at the protest and really just support the people that are out there fighting for our First Amendment rights.” - Several participants discuss plans to act on protest grounds, including references to “Using other state capitals for practice dry runs” (Speaker 4) and “we’re basically ready to storm the capital with us in a couple of minutes” (Speaker 5). - There are assertions that “we’re all actors, but I wanna direct and act” (Speaker 6) and depictions of confrontations with others during protest or media interactions, including exchanges where people demand to speak with others about Mary Fenix/Fanning (Speaker 5). - A series of critical assertions target then-President Donald Trump and link various individuals and organizations to a network. A speaker states: “Donald Trump has no business being president,” followed by further claims about a coalition “super think tank of Biden, Harris, a couple intellectual figure behind them… Mike Flynn… and two economists,” including Simon Johnson, described as IMF chief economist, with English birth. - The conversation introduces the America Project and Patrick Byrne, claiming Flynn registered Flynn Intel Group from Stanley McChrystal’s home and associating McChrystal with the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system that detects opposing viewpoints for Trump, and then shares those viewpoints to counter them. The system is said to target the Patriot movement. - There is a claim that the Flynn network included Ali Alexander and Michael Flynn, and that their aim was “to create instability as they're trying to carry out a color revolution,” listing criteria such as “a united and organized opposition,” “an ability quickly to drive home the point that voting results are falsified,” “compliant independent media,” and “capable of mobilizing tens of thousands or more demonstrators.” - A discussion on 2020 voting numbers is presented as a comparison to the midterms. It is stated that “2020, they reported 395,000 in-person voters on election day,” with debate about whether that figure was statewide or in Maricopa County. Projections speculate on how many Republicans intended to vote but did not cast ballots, with estimates ranging from around 150,000 to 700,000. - Additional claims connect groups and individuals to broader political finance and media ecosystems, including mentions of the US Agency for Global Media, prior Hillary Clinton and John Kerry involvement, and references to propaganda concerns. - Toward the end, the discussion touches upon Wisconsin politics again, with commentary on a state supreme court candidate and voter ID emphasis as a Democrat-leaning position contrary to expectations, followed by a shift into a more personal debate about a case involving a mother’s tragedy and media attention, ending with a tangential accusation of sympathy manipulation.

The speaker, who is the editor of Maui Times, expresses frustration with the narrative that the media is lying about the Lahaina fire. They have been trying to get information from the county of Maui and the Maui police department, but both have been unresponsive. The speaker also mentions being denied access to Lahaina town and being sent on a fruitless search for the media coordinator. They emphasize that it is not the media lying, but the government entities trying to avoid accountability. The speaker hopes that making this situation go viral will prompt a response from them.

The speaker expresses disbelief at the media's lack of interest in the Maui story, suggesting the true story is being suppressed. They question whether several events are coincidences: the Maui police chief also being in charge during the Las Vegas massacre, billionaires' properties remaining untouched while locals' homes burned, the emergency sirens not sounding, the water being turned off, and police blocking escape routes. The speaker also points to the governor signing an emergency proclamation about housing three weeks before the fire. Further coincidences, according to the speaker, include the government erecting a black fence around Lahaina, the FAA grounding drones, plans since 2011 to make Maui a smart city powered by renewable energy, locals being evicted from undamaged homes, and fact-checkers dismissing these events as coincidences while being owned by BlackRock. Another speaker notes the media has not interviewed grieving parents or children.

The speaker discusses the recent fires in Maui and the government's plan to make the entire island a smart island governed by AI. They mention the challenges faced by locals in accessing assistance and donations, with organizations like FEMA and Red Cross allegedly hoarding supplies. The speaker also highlights the disorganization in distributing aid and the lack of communication from the government. They express frustration with the government's response and praise the efforts of local communities in helping those in need. The speaker urges viewers to share the information and emphasizes that the government is not being transparent about the situation.

The speaker expresses surprise at the media's lack of interest in the Maui incident. They suggest that the true story, which the media is not allowed to tell, involves the Police Chief's connection to the Las Vegas massacre and the untouched property of billionaires while locals' homes burned. Another speaker points out the media's failure to interview grieving parents, children, or schools. The first speaker questions the coincidences surrounding the silent emergency sirens, the water being turned off, police blocking streets, and the governor's emergency proclamation. They also mention the black fence around Lahaina, the drone ban, plans for a smart city, and locals being evicted. The speaker concludes by mentioning the fact checkers' ownership by BlackRock.

The speaker expresses surprise at the lack of media interest in the Maui incident. They suggest that the media is not allowed to tell the true story, pointing out connections between the Maui police chief and the Las Vegas massacre, as well as the untouched property of billionaires. Another speaker adds that the media has not interviewed any grieving parents or children affected by the incident. The first speaker questions the coincidences surrounding the emergency sirens, water being turned off, police blocking streets, and the governor's emergency proclamation. They also mention the black fence, grounded drones, plans for renewable energy, and locals being evicted. The speaker concludes by mentioning that fact checkers who dismiss these claims are owned by BlackRock.

The speaker expresses disbelief at the media's lack of interest in the Maui story. They question whether it is a coincidence that the Maui police chief was also in charge in Las Vegas during the mass shooting. They also question why properties owned by billionaires were untouched by the fires while local homes burned. The speaker notes the media has not interviewed grieving parents or children. They ask if it is a coincidence that the emergency sirens never sounded, the water was turned off, and police blocked off streets. They mention the governor signed an emergency proclamation about housing three weeks before the fire. The speaker questions the black fence around Lahaina, the FAA grounding drones, and plans since 2011 to make Maui a smart city run by renewable energy. They claim locals whose homes didn't burn are being evicted. They state that fact checkers are owned and run by BlackRock.

The speaker expresses surprise at the media's lack of interest in the Maui incident, suggesting there is a hidden story. They question the coincidence of the police chief's involvement in both the Maui incident and the Las Vegas massacre. They also mention how the media has not interviewed any grieving parents or children affected by the incident. The speaker highlights various coincidences, such as the silent emergency sirens, water being turned off, police blocking streets, and the government's actions. They mention plans for Maui to become a smart city and the eviction of locals whose homes were not affected. The speaker concludes by pointing out that fact-checkers dismissing these coincidences are owned by BlackRock.

An independent journalist confronted a speaker at a media briefing in Lahaina. The journalist asked about the release of public information and questioned the speaker's identity. The police intervened to calm the situation, but the journalist persisted. The confrontation ended peacefully. The journalist asked about the number of cadavers, specifically how many were children, but did not receive a clear answer. The journalist criticized the speaker and accused them of being a disaster and lacking respect. The speaker defended themselves and urged the journalist to let others ask their questions. The confrontation continued, but the transcript ends without a resolution.

Living on Maui, the speaker claims that the media is not being truthful about the damage and death toll. They personally know individuals who assert that the situation is far more severe than reported. The speaker also alleges witnessing a media cover-up.

The video features conversations between various individuals regarding restrictions on filming and photography in a designated emergency area in Lahaina, Maui. The speakers discuss conflicting information from law enforcement and the National Guard regarding the legality of recording. They also mention the devastating fire that occurred and the number of casualties. One individual plans to file a lawsuit challenging the restrictions on First Amendment rights. The video concludes with the reporter summarizing the situation and expressing his intention to continue recording despite the restrictions.

There is a significant effort to prevent anyone from seeing what is happening in Lahaina West Maui. A black fence has been erected, blocking the view of Ground 0. Foreign police cars have been spotted, along with National Guard and regular police. Drones are not allowed in the area, and people are prohibited from stopping their cars or taking pictures. The speaker has managed to capture unique footage, which has been shared with multiple people. They are working on another video to compare the current situation with a week ago. The speaker expresses gratitude for the support they have received, allowing them to focus on sharing information and resisting attacks on freedom and the First Amendment. The presence of police, including special police, is evident in the clips. The speaker mentions the effort being put into preventing access to the burned area. More updates are promised.

Living on Maui, the speaker claims that the media is not being truthful about the damage and death toll. They personally know individuals who assert that the situation is far more severe than reported. The speaker also alleges witnessing a media cover-up.

In this video, the speaker shares their personal experience of being trapped in Lahaina for four days. They claim that what happened was not a natural disaster but a direct energy attack on Maui. The speaker suggests that the attack was targeted due to the presence of certain descendants. They describe how buildings were destroyed and people were not given proper information or assistance. The speaker emphasizes that the news reports are not accurate and urges viewers to share the video to expose the hidden truth. The speaker concludes by stating their intention to use their platform to shed light on the situation.

An independent journalist confronted a speaker at a media briefing in Lahaina, asking about the release of information. The journalist was physically held back by police but persisted in asking questions about the number of cadavers and how many of them were children. The speaker, who was from the Maui police department, did not provide clear answers and the confrontation escalated. The journalist criticized the speaker for not respecting others and accused him of being the worst mayor. The exchange ended with the journalist being told to leave.

The speaker expresses surprise at the media's lack of interest in the Maui incident, suggesting that there is a hidden story. They question the coincidence of the police chief's involvement in both the Maui incident and the Las Vegas massacre. They also mention that the media has not interviewed any grieving parents or children affected by the incident. The speaker highlights several coincidences, such as the silence of emergency sirens, the water being turned off, and the blocking of streets during the fire. They mention the governor's emergency proclamation, the black fence around Lahaina, and the restriction on drones flying over affected areas. The speaker suggests a connection between these coincidences and plans to make Maui a smart city. They also mention the eviction of locals whose homes were not affected and the fact that fact-checkers are owned by BlackRock.