TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In June 2021, we informed them about 25,000+ suspected counterfeit ballots. Despite having over a year to address the issue, they failed to prevent it from happening again in 2022. The GOP spread propaganda to discredit our findings, but everyone knew about it beforehand.

Speaker 1 respects the right of people to vote for the president. However, it is questioned why, for the first time in American history, a president won every swing state while also being best friends with and having their largest donation from a man who owns and runs the Internet. It is hoped that this will be investigated to determine if it was an anomaly. It is curious, especially since Kamala Harris was filling up stadiums with supporters, while Donald Trump was not. As an American and believer in democracy, Speaker 1 hopes to look at all the reasons why this happened in the country.

The speaker claims that a sudden increase of 138,000 votes for Biden is statistically improbable due to its linear movement and the absence of any votes for Trump. They argue that in any location with that many voters, at least some votes would be expected for the opposing candidate. The speaker suggests this anomaly occurred around 4:30 AM, followed by another at 6:23 AM. They also find it inexplicable that Nevada suddenly stopped counting votes in the middle of the day, contrary to typical election procedures.

The speaker claims that real-time Edison data reveals election data manipulation. According to the speaker, Seidl receives raw election data directly from election officials in at least nine states. The speaker alleges that an additive process should show more votes, not deletions, in each interval report. However, a video of Edison reports allegedly shows pauses, oscillation, and deletions in total, in-person, and mail-in votes. The speaker claims this is the algorithm trying to figure out the math problem. The speaker points to North Carolina and Georgia counties as examples, noting Seidl directly contracts with Georgia. The speaker then plays a clip of someone discussing estimated vote percentages dropping, suggesting the reported results are not actual results. The speaker questions the calling of races with razor-thin margins, particularly Arizona, based on projections and alleged impossible data anomalies. The speaker asserts that historically, those counting votes called races, but now machines and news outlets do, deterring challenges.

In June of 2021, we informed them about our suspicion of over 25,000 counterfeit ballots. The GOP and conservative operatives spread propaganda to undermine our credibility. Despite having ample time to prevent a repeat in 2022, they chose to do nothing. As a result, the same fraudulent activities occurred again in 2020.

Political Polling Liaison Strategies has been releasing polls daily for the past week after never appearing on the 338Canada website before 03/12/2025. This began right after Mark Carney won the Liberal leadership race. Liaison Strategies, a Toronto-based firm, has received over $7 million in government grants from Canadian Heritage since 2020. The firm's recent surge in polling data on 338Canada coincides with the Liberals gaining a slight lead. The sudden influx of polls could be a strategy to inflate Liberal support and create the illusion of momentum. This could backfire by motivating Conservative voters, who may believe their party could lose if they don't turn out. The situation is described as not normal, and viewers are encouraged to stay skeptical and vote.

Speaker 1 questions the accuracy of Elections Canada, suggesting the Tarrabon incident, where an error occurred, is not an isolated event. Speaker 1 expresses doubt that this was the only error of its kind and wants to know the probability of it being a unique occurrence, implying there are likely more errors that have been overlooked or "obsoleted."

The speaker describes irregularities observed in absentee/mail-in ballots. They claim that the ballot numbers and the last names on the ballots were in sequence, which should not happen with mail-in ballots because those ballots are supposed to arrive at different times and cannot be sequential like 2-2-3-2 next to 2-2-3-3. This pattern triggered the speaker’s concern, leading them to think something was wrong. The speaker states they began noticing that the numbers were almost adjacent to each other, with one hovering around the middle. This prompted them to raise questions about the process. They then asked the supervisor for clarification, but the supervisor reacted angrily, saying, “you’re not letting us do our job. You’re disturbing us.” Feeling hesitant to push the issue further for fear of being kicked out and wanting to stay in the room due to a lack of other observers, the speaker chose not to challenge the process more than they already had. They allege that the sequence of ballot numbers came from the same area, specifically Goddard Street in Downtown Detroit, and that the signatures on those ballots were all alike. The speaker notes several additional anomalies: envelopes had no date stamp, only the word “November 2020” without a more specific date, and there was no second or third numbering visible. They observed that none of these ballots were coming up in the voting system; instead, they were being entered manually. The speaker claims that the poll book or the system would not reflect these details, implying that the ballots were processed outside the normal electronic recordkeeping. In summary, the speaker alleges a pattern of sequential ballot numbers and similar signatures associated with absentee ballots from a single street area, envelopes without proper dating, and manual entry into the system rather than through standard digital processing, with the supervisor resisting questions about these irregularities.

The speaker discusses a report and rates its significance on a scale of 1 to 10. They mention that the final report reveals that 23,344 mail-in ballots were sent to addresses where the individuals no longer lived, yet votes were still cast on them. These ballots were identified through a national change of address form, which people fill out when they move. The speaker finds this illogical and believes the attorney general should provide an explanation. They emphasize that the election was decided by a margin of 10,000 votes, while the issue of the 23,344 ballots is just one example of irregularities.

The speaker expresses disbelief that an election could be won by a single vote. They highlight the absurdity of the situation, noting the initial vote count was 44-35 in favor of the liberal party. The speaker finds it bizarre that the election result hinges on one vote. They then mention a woman named Emmanuel, who claims Elections Canada didn't count her vote due to an incorrect address. The speaker questions how, out of all the people in Turbine, Emmanuel, who allegedly voted for the block, was the only one whose vote couldn't be found.

The speaker alleges that recent polls showing a surge in Liberal support are manipulated. They focus on several polling firms, highlighting alleged biases. The speaker claims Alex Nandoff, associated with Liaison polling, previously worked as an executive assistant for a Liberal MPP. They also point to Raymond Edwards, linked to Nandoff's corporation and working as chief of equity and inclusion officer, with a past role at Corporation Canada during the corporation's formation. The speaker then examines Main Street, noting their small sample sizes and the background of Quito Maggi, who has a history of helping candidates win elections. The speaker references a Twitter dispute among pollsters, highlighting Nick Kovaslis from Campaign Research, who claims his polls show the Conservative Party ahead, despite previously being a Liberal supporter. The speaker suggests Kovaslis was removed from CRIC due to tweets supporting Pierre Pauliev. The speaker concludes that the polls are manipulated due to pressure on the Liberals.

An individual working for Elections Canada in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The individual's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. They state that no votes from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, and Uxbridge had been brought to the office to be counted. The individual questions how CTV and subsequently CBC could declare the Liberals as winners without any votes counted from Durham region. They call for an investigation, stating that something is not right.

An Elections Canada worker in Durham region states that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The worker's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. According to the worker, none of the packages had arrived at the office yet from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The worker believes this situation "reeks" and warrants investigation.

On November 9th, there was a mysterious occurrence where 25,000 ballots went missing in the reported count. The next day, on November 10th, these ballots magically appeared, affecting the outcome of the race. This doesn't make sense and is completely wrong. The law exists to safeguard the integrity of the vote.

Eric Spakane, a forensic chemist and forensic document analyst, testified that there were about 25,000 ballots not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. He said the printing process and appearance are completely different than what you would get from a first generation PDF printing. He explained that in Maricopa County there were approximately 5,012 or a little over 5,000 different ballot permutations and combinations due to different races and districts, and this is multiplied by two because there is a Spanish version for each ballot. In total, about 5,000 different ballots are created ahead of time and are created in PDF. These PDFs are prepared in advance for mail-in ballots and for early voting, which uses vote on demand, allowing someone to vote in a downtown location using a ballot from their area. He noted that PDFs are high quality, and when printed they should look roughly the same as the PDF, but he found that the quality of these ballots degraded when printed, compared to on-demand or third-party provider printing. Spakane stated that in the group of ballots he examined, the election subcontractor Minion produced ballots for each zone or district involved in the area he looked at in Maricopa County. He reiterated that there were about 5,000 approximately different ballots, reflecting the various races and jurisdictions (e.g., two different senator races, multiple house races, and all permutations and combinations). He claimed that about 25,000 ballots were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot, and that the printing process produced marks that did not align with the perfect lines and breaks seen in the PDFs. He observed that early voting ballots and election-day ballots from various polling locations showed printing with breaks in all the same places around an oval, indicating imperfections in the lines at the same spots on every ballot. Speaker 1 stated that these 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone represent over double Joe Biden's 10,457 vote mark. He framed this as a comparison to the election results. Speaker 2 claimed that in July 2021, and even in June earlier, they suspected that there were 25,000 plus counterfeit or inauthentic ballots. He attributed this to propaganda by the GOP’s attorney and other conservative operatives who allegedly planted the seed that “you can't trust that.” He asserted that everyone up there knew this in advance, even before the hearing, and criticized those involved for not reacting to prevent duplication in 2022, saying they did nothing and allowed it to be done again.

- Speaker 0 asserts that mail-in ballots are corrupt and that a Republican-led effort will end mail-in ballots, including drafting an executive order by “the best lawyers in the country.” They claim the U.S. is nearly the only country using mail-in ballots and cite “massive fraud all over the place,” arguing that secure, paper-ballot elections with watermarking would produce faster results (claims that paper ballots provide results the same night, whereas machines allegedly take two weeks). - The conversation references a specific election night anomaly: a block of 138,000 votes (Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 confirm “138,000” votes) all reportedly voting for Biden with no Trump votes in that segment, described as inexplicable and not consistent with expected linear reporting. They note the timing as around 04:30–06:30 in the morning and suggest the results should not be linear given numerous counters reporting across states. They also complain that Nevada stopped counting mid-day, calling it inexplicable and illogical. - Speaker 4 claims a counting software glitch caused a 6,000-vote swing in a county, where ballots counted for Democrats were miscalculated for Republicans; she states that 47 counties use the same software. - Speaker 5 demonstrates concerns about voting-machine security: he shows how a bad actor could gain full admin access in under two minutes by opening a device, removing the card reader, and bypassing error messages, implying easy manipulation of tabulation in 18 states using the machine. - Speaker 6 describes observed ballot processing irregularities: a ballot-stuffing environment where ballots are stamped and filled in rapidly at the top of tickets, with security oversight present but gaps noted in workflow. - Speaker 7 discusses absentee/mail-in ballots with suspicions about sequence numbers: numbers appeared almost sequential, suggesting they could not be from mailed-in ballots, as mailed ballots typically arrive at different numbers; they note there was no date on envelopes and that some details would not be in poll books or the system, alleging irregularities in how ballots were handled. - Speaker 8 reports ongoing theft of duplicate ballots: a table for duplicates existed, but ballots were copied and redistributed at various tables, with duplicates not fully processed and ballots stashed under boxes; the speaker claims this occurred throughout the night. - Speaker 9 recounts a local media denial of fraud at the TCF center, contrasted with video obtained later showing a van delivering ballots after hours; she describes escort cars, a back-and-forth of ballots, and suggests the presence of unobserved ballots and a lack of witnesses during tabulation. She notes that the video was shared publicly and led to the suspension of a social-media account. - Speaker 10 provides a timeline from October 21, detailing a driver delivering mail-in ballots from New York to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and then to Lancaster, with the driver faced hours of waiting, lack of slips, and unclear purpose for moving the load; the driver states that this was the only time he transported mail-in ballots and expresses a belief in the importance of honest elections for Americans.

An Elections Canada worker in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The worker's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order for tabulation. According to the worker, not a single vote package had arrived at the office from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The worker believes this situation "reeks" and warrants investigation.

In recounting votes, I've noticed that simply comparing hand counts to machine counts doesn't address the origin of the ballots being counted. Often, we don't even know which precinct a ballot came from, especially when dealing with two-sided ballots. We focus solely on the vote itself without considering the front of the ballot. Additionally, the image quality of these questionable ballots in Pennsylvania and Arizona is not being examined during the recount process.

An individual who was supposed to be working for Elections Canada in Durham region states that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The job entailed ensuring that all packages were sealed and documentation was in order after votes were brought to the office from each polling station, so votes could be tabulated and counted. According to the speaker, not a single vote in Durham region had been brought to the office or counted. The speaker questions how CTV and then CBC could declare the Liberals as winners when votes from a large area east of the GTA, including Pickering, Ajax, Whippy, Oshawa, Uckbridge, and Uxbridge, had not yet been counted. The speaker believes this situation "reeks" and warrants investigation.

If an election is close, Commonwealth will win by cheating, fortifying, and stealing ballots. Elections are not perfectly clean, but changes were done in plain daylight. To improve elections, run them like other Western democracies: one-day voting, practically no absentee ballots, and stronger voter ID. This used to be more common in the U.S., but has decayed over the last 20-30 years. Results were available on election day 30-40 years ago, which no longer happens.

The speaker discusses the final report released to the public, which reveals that 23,344 mail-in ballots were sent to individuals who no longer lived at the address. Despite this, votes were still cast using those ballots. The speaker emphasizes that this is just one example of irregularities in the election, which was decided by a margin of 10,000 votes. They express their confusion and call for the attorney general to address this issue.

The speaker discusses a situation where an election result hinged on a single vote, which they find statistically improbable. They mention a previously uncounted vote that was discovered, potentially creating a tie or necessitating a recount. The speaker raises concerns about 800 canceled votes and questions the criteria and oversight involved in rejecting votes. They call for transparency and scrutiny of every rejected vote, suggesting potential errors or biases in the process. The speaker questions Elections Canada and whether they will review every single thing. They express the opinion that winning by one vote in this scenario suggests possible manipulation, implying someone may have arbitrarily decided the outcome.

The speaker discusses how the vote total may have been altered through the HAMMER program and ScoreCard software, affecting the election outcome. They mention a computer glitch in Michigan that favored President Trump, suggesting similar issues in other states. They question the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden, deeming it statistically improbable.

In a close election, it's likely that the Commonwealth will manipulate the outcome through tactics like ballot harvesting. While there are rule changes that seem transparent, elections are not entirely clean. To improve the system, elections should be conducted like in other Western democracies: one-day voting with minimal absentee ballots, stronger voter ID requirements, and making Election Day a national holiday. This approach would ensure that only eligible voters participate and restore the integrity of the electoral process, which has significantly declined over the past few decades.

An individual working for Elections Canada in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The individual's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. They state that no votes from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge had arrived at the office. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The individual believes this situation is suspicious and warrants investigation.