TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

There was no water main break. A toilet leaked earlier in the day but had no impact on the election. The water main break announcement was made to clear the room of poll watchers and media. The next morning, it was discovered that 5 women at State Farm Arena had scanned ballots for about 2.5 hours. One woman repeatedly ran the same stack of ballots through the scanner, as did another woman at a different desk. This video evidence shows that the principle of "1 man, 1 vote" was disregarded. It's like having a video of someone running a red light, eliminating the need for witnesses. Expert analysis is unnecessary.

At 11:05 PM, everyone was told to leave due to a false water main break. However, the real issue was a toilet leak earlier in the day, which had no impact on the election. The water main break announcement was likely made to clear the room of poll watchers and media. The next morning, it was discovered that five women at State Farm Arena had been scanning ballots for about two and a half hours. They were seen repeatedly running the same stack of ballots through the scanner. This incident raises concerns about the integrity of the voting process.

The speaker explains that a table was placed by a person at 8:22 am. Later, they witnessed four suitcases being taken out from under the table. The speaker questions why these separate ballots were only counted when the place was cleared out with no witnesses. They estimate that around 18,000 ballots could have been processed during the two hours when no one was present to supervise. The speaker mentions that the operation continued until around 12:55 am, and they have video evidence of people counting ballots after they were told to stop. The video concludes with the speaker asking if everyone has seen enough and fast-forwarding to 12:55 am.

Ballots were allegedly found under a table in a video presented. The person who placed the table there is said to be the same person who cleared the area and claimed to stop counting. Four suitcases were seen being taken out from under the table. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses present. The machines used can process 3,000 ballots per hour, and they were running for 2 hours. This raises concerns about the number of ballots processed without supervision. The video continues until around 1 a.m., showing the ongoing operation. The speaker asks if everyone has seen enough and proceeds to fast forward to 12:55 a.m.

A table was placed by a lady with blonde braids at 8:22 am. The same person who cleared the place later put the table there. Four suitcases were seen coming out from under the table, and one was pulled out by a gentleman in red. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses and the place was cleared. Multiple machines were present for two hours, capable of processing 3,000 ballots per hour. It is unclear how many ballots went through the machines during that time without supervision.

At 8 o'clock in the morning, a person placed a black table in the room. Later, when the place was cleared out, the same person pulled out four suitcases from under the table. These suitcases contained separate ballots that were counted without any witnesses present. With multiple machines processing around 3,000 ballots per hour for two hours, it is believed that the number of ballots processed during that time could have influenced the outcome of the race.

In Gwinnett County, approximately 270 people went to a ballot box, but 1,862 ballots were deposited according to the custody document. After reviewing 24 hours of video footage, it was confirmed that 271 people approached the ballot box, but only 1,962 ballots were seen. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. There were breakdowns in the process, and at the end of the day, two individuals were supposed to transfer the ballots into bags, but another person appeared and took the 1,962 ballots in two black duffle bags instead of the usual blue cooler. It is unclear who this person was. The supervision of this process falls under the responsibility of the secretary of state of Georgia. It was evident that nobody was intended to review these videos.

A table was placed by a lady with blonde braids at 8:22 am. The same person who cleared the place later put the table there. Four suitcases were seen coming out from under the table, and one was pulled out by a gentleman in red. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses and the place was cleared. Multiple machines were present for two hours, capable of processing 3,000 ballots per hour. The lack of supervision and adherence to rules raises questions about the number of ballots processed during that time.

A table was placed by a woman with blonde braids at 8:22 AM, and the same person who cleared the area under the pretense of stopping the count also set it up. Four suitcases were seen being pulled from under the table. Questions arise about why these ballots were separated from others and only counted when the area was cleared of witnesses. The machines can process about 3,000 ballots per hour, and with multiple machines operating for two hours, it's crucial to consider how many ballots were processed without supervision, which raises concerns about adherence to statutes and rules.

There was no water main break; it was a toilet leak hours earlier that was cleaned up and had no impact on the election. The water main break announcement was made to clear the room of poll watchers and media, with vote counting to resume the next morning. People were stunned to learn that five women at State Farm Arena worked for about two and a half hours, from just before 11 PM until just before 1 AM, scanning ballots. One woman in a purple top at desk one is shown on video at 4x speed taking the same stack of ballots and running them through the scanner multiple times. The woman to her right in the yellow top did the same thing with a stack of ballots on her desk. This is presented as evidence that "one man, one vote just went out the window."

In the exchange, concerns are raised about mail-in ballots in Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and how they were counted. Speaker 0 notes that ballots were counted without observers, citing 682,770 ballots observed and asking about the 1,823,148 mailed-out ballots, contrasted with a final count showing 2,589,242 mail-in ballots. The core question is: what explains the roughly 700,000 mail-in ballots that “appeared from nowhere”? Speaker 1 responds that their cyber team uses white-hat hacking techniques to gather publicly available information from the secretary of state’s website, which has been updated as late as 11:16 this morning with provisional and mail-in ballots, though those numbers continue to change. He adds that the 2,500,000 figure is no longer on the website, and it has “just been taken off.” There is no annotation explaining why. Speaker 2 then describes an on-the-ground observation: a deputy sheriff, a senior law enforcement officer, was seen not being observed and walking in with baggies, with USBs being inserted into machines. The witness claims to have personally witnessed this 24 times, with additional witnesses including Democrat poll watchers. They were told by an attorney that every election leaves a couple of USB cards in the voting machines to be brought back by the warehouse manager, but this account is contradicted by law enforcement and other officials. The witness states that 47 USB cards are missing and “they’re nowhere to be found,” and that 32 to 30 cards uploaded were not present in the live vote update. The witness demanded timely live upload of vote results, which showed 50,000 votes; they assert those votes were for Vice President Biden, though they note that identifying who those votes were for should not matter to a computer scientist. Speaker 1 emphasizes that forensic evidence from the computers was not obtained: the procedure would involve turning off the computer, imaging the drive with BitLocker, under law enforcement observation, which would take about an hour for five machines. This forensic imaging was never performed, despite objections three weeks earlier. They later learned that virtually all chain-of-custody logs, yellow sheets, and forensic records in Delaware County were gone; a signing party attempted to recreate the logs with poll workers but was unsuccessful in recovering them all. The discussion concludes with a claim that there are 100,000 to 120,000 ballots, both mail-in and USB, in question, and that there is no remedy or “cure” within the local charter for certifying a presidential vote, leaving the speaker asserting that nobody could certify the vote in good conscience.

In this video, footage analyzed by Gateway Pundit reveals suspicious activity during the ballot counting process. Poll workers, including Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wondreya Moss, were caught on camera scanning the same stack of ballots multiple times after GOP observers and reporters had left the room. They continued counting uninterrupted for over 3 hours. It is highly illegal to scan the same batch of ballots repeatedly, and this was all captured on tape. Georgia officials have dismissed the evidence, but no explanation has been given for Freeman's actions or why they remained behind while the building was evacuated. Lawyers find it unusual to store briefcases full of ballots under tablecloths, and it is unclear when they were delivered or why they were retrieved after the GOP observers left. Experts suggest that this activity could explain the sudden increase in votes for Joe Biden.

A table was placed by a lady with blonde braids at 8:22 am. The same person who cleared the area later put the table there. Four suitcases were seen coming out from under the table. A man in red pulled out one of the ballots. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses. The machines can process 3,000 ballots per hour, and they were there for 2 hours without supervision. The number of ballots processed during that time is unclear.

At around 8:22 AM, a person placed a black table in the room. Later, when the place was cleared out, four suitcases were taken out from under the table. The question is why these separate ballots were only counted when there were no witnesses present. The machines can process 3,000 ballots per hour, and they were there for two hours. If three scanners were working, that's 18,000 ballots. There were six people involved, and the operation continued until around 12:55 AM. The video shows the people who provided affidavits appearing at that time to check if counting was still happening. If you've seen enough, we can fast forward to 12:55 AM.

A table was placed by a lady with blonde braids at 8:22 AM. The same person who cleared the place later put the table there. Four suitcases were seen coming out from under the table. There were separate ballots being counted without witnesses present. The machines can process 3,000 ballots an hour, and they were there for 2 hours. The question is how many ballots went through the machines during that time without supervision, in accordance with the rules.

A lady with blonde braids placed a table at 8:22 AM. The same person who cleared the place out under the pretense of stopping the count also put the table there. Four suitcases came out from underneath the table. A man in red pulled one of the suitcases out. The question is, why are these ballots separate from the others, and why are they only counting them when the place is cleared out with no witnesses? The machines can process about 3,000 ballots an hour, and there were multiple machines for two hours. The question is, how many ballots went through those machines in those two hours when no one was there to supervise, consistent with statutes and rules?

On October 11th, from 7:30 AM to October 12th, approximately 270 people accessed a ballot box in Gwinnett County, but 1,962 ballots were recorded as deposited. Reviewing 24 hours of video confirmed the 271 individuals, but the number of ballots did not match. There’s uncertainty about the discrepancy. On that day, two individuals were responsible for transferring the ballots, but an unidentified person appeared, took the ballots from two black duffel bags, and left without following the usual protocol of using a cooler. The oversight of this process is questionable, as it seems no one intended for the videos to be scrutinized.

At 11:05 PM, everyone was told to leave due to a false water main break. However, the real issue was a toilet leak earlier in the day, which had no impact on the election. The water main break announcement was likely made to clear the room of poll watchers and media. The next morning, it was discovered that five women at State Farm Arena had been scanning ballots for about two and a half hours. They were seen repeatedly running the same stack of ballots through the scanner. This raises concerns about the integrity of the voting process. The incident at State Farm Arena on November 3rd, 2020, undermines the principle of one person, one vote.

In Georgia, a poll worker named Ruby was caught on Instagram live secretly handling absentee ballots after media and poll workers were told to leave State Farm Arena. Ruby and four others stayed behind, pulling out boxes of ballots from under a table and distributing them to different counting stations. Meanwhile, in Fulton County, Georgia, five individuals are still working late into the night to scan and tabulate absentee ballots. A video shows Ruby and other workers running the same stack of ballots through the machine multiple times. Notably, there is a significant increase in Biden votes after this tabulation.

In Georgia, a poll worker named Ruby was caught on Instagram live secretly handling absentee ballots after the media and other poll workers were told to leave State Farm Arena. Ruby and a few others stayed behind, pulling out boxes of ballots from under a table and distributing them to different counting stations. Meanwhile, in Fulton County, Georgia, five individuals are still working late into the night to scan and tabulate absentee ballots. A video shows Ruby and other workers running the same stack of ballots through the machine multiple times. Notably, there is a significant increase in Biden votes after this tabulation.

The speaker asserts that in their affidavit they list 19 points and describe spending 27 hours at the TCF Center. They state they are a mother with two children and two degrees, and claim they would never write an affidavit under oath just to write it, noting that you can go to prison for this. They explain that they was initially supposed to work at the Detroit Department of Elections building, an order by their manager, Nick Economagunas, whom they identify as part owner of Dominion. They claim they have emails confirming the arrangement and that they were trained on the adjudication and tabulation process. An email allegedly instructs them to park in a lot and be shuttled to what they call the “Chicago Warehouse.” The speaker asserts that there was illegal activity at that location, stating that there are pictures of people carrying ballots out of the place and vans full of ballots leaving. Around 4:30 AM, they say there was an announcement that a new shipment of ballots was arriving, and that these boxes of ballots were brought in by “mister Baxter” from the rear of the room. They personally witnessed Mr. Baxter carrying boxes from the rear basement of the TCF Center to the tables. They describe each box as containing approximately 600 ballots, and note that the tables were 10-foot tables and about seven tables in total, all full of boxes of ballots. They estimate that about 50,000 ballots were brought in, clarifying that not all ballots were necessarily from the rear entrance, but that there were far more ballots than the ones brought in from the rear entrance. They recount the timeline as starting at 6 AM, with shipments arriving around 4:30–5 AM, and three rounds of activity earlier in the night—from around 10 PM to 1 AM and 1 AM to 4 AM—followed by the arrival of the 4:30 AM boxes. With the shift change, most volunteers, who had expected to be there from 10 PM to 5 AM, left at 5 AM, leaving the speaker to stay. The shift change occurred, and at 6 AM, Baxter and his management team resumed on the microphone. They allegedly stated, “this is what democracy is is supposed to look like,” and the whole room cheered in response to the new shift.

There was no water main break. A toilet leaked earlier but had no impact on the election. The water main break was used as an excuse to clear the room. The vote count was supposed to resume the next morning, but it was discovered that 5 women had been scanning ballots for 2 and a half hours the previous night. One woman repeatedly ran the same stack of ballots through the scanner. Another woman did the same on her desk. This video evidence shows that the principle of one person, one vote was disregarded. It's like having a video of someone running a red light, no need for expert testimony.

At a voting center late at night, officials told everyone to stop counting and go home, but four people stayed behind. They took out four boxes of ballots from under a table and continued scanning them throughout the night. This video, described as the "smoking gun" by Rudy Giuliani, confirms previous testimonies from credible witnesses who witnessed irregular activities and violations of the law in six states. It is difficult for anyone honest to deny the evidence and claim that the election was conducted fairly.

A person placed a table at 8:22 AM, under which 4 suitcases of ballots were found. The ballots were counted without witnesses present, raising concerns about the process. With machines capable of processing 3,000 ballots per hour, multiple machines ran for 2 hours without supervision, violating rules and statutes.

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.