reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Long white trails in the sky, which do not dissipate and form artificial clouds, are intentionally created by geoengineers. This pollution poses a significant danger to us, and the military industrial complex is responsible for these cloud formations and weather manipulation programs. After sacrificing four years defending my country, I returned home to discover even greater threats domestically. I cannot identify the culprits or their motives, but I can say that this phenomenon is neither natural nor normal. There is ongoing debate about the presence of aluminum, which is commonly found in bonded form but not in its free form. However, we are detecting high levels of free aluminum due to the dispersion of small particles in the environment, increasing the overall surface area. The white haze observed when looking at the sun is actually aluminum suspended in the air.

Speaker 0 describes a snowstorm in Texas during which a sample was taken to a lab. She references reports of people attempting to burn the snow, which would not burn. In the lab results, aluminum, barium, stonium, mercury, lead, sulfur, and nitrates were found at dangerously high levels. She states these are toxic chemical compounds known to harm the brain, the nervous system, and the environment. She adds, “You're not crazy for asking questions. You're crazy if you stay silent.” She mentions helping with brain fog symptoms all week in Texas. She asks whether the snow could be fake snow sent upon them and ends with the claim that everywhere we look is evil.

A speaker describes observing a thin chemical trail left by a plane that does not disappear, claiming it is not condensation and would not evaporate with sunlight. They identify the substances as aluminum, and also name barium, strontium, mercury, nanoparticles, bacteria, and other airborne contaminants, asserting these are not water and do not vanish as expected. They reference a prior video/photo showing a plane with a thin tail of chemicals, and explain that wind fans this trail, creating a visible pattern in the sky. The speaker notes days with a “mackerel sky,” or fishtail-like patterns, and suggests these patterns result from pulsing the air with electric magnetic pulses, drawing a connection to 5G rollout and the emergence of 6G. The speaker asks why this matters and links the visible trails to a broader pattern: planes spraying trails that do not dissipate and then the appearance, within hours, of related sky effects. They provide live observations of another plane moving at roughly a 45-degree angle, demonstrating a trailing, fanning path, and point to additional trails appearing at different locations, reinforcing the claim that this is ongoing and widespread. They argue that the haze contains heavy metals, neurotoxins, bacteria, and viruses, and that these substances descend to the ground, contaminating rainwater, plants, livestock, and ultimately people who drink the water, eat the plants, and eat the animals. The speaker asserts that people are being poisoned in air, food, and water on multiple daily levels, with an increasing toxic load. Health implications are described in personal terms: direct poisoning from inhaled substances affects noses, eyes, lungs, hearts, and causes respiratory and cardiac issues. The speaker mentions personal experiences with their children and references experts involved in a planned national effort to address what they describe as mass poisoning of humanity. They claim people go to doctors not to be detoxed or antidoted, but to be diagnosed as ill, leading to testing and medications that do not address the alleged poison, including PCR tests or vaccines, which they claim can vaccinate via nasal administration according to Johns Hopkins. They argue the medical system tracks and medicates people, giving side effects and more medications, while failing to address the alleged toxic load. The speaker asserts that some people die from ingesting these substances or from neurological diseases like Alzheimer's and ALS, which they attribute to aluminum, a known neurotoxin. They warn that without detoxification, individuals may become lifelong patients or die, urging action to end whatever this is. They lament the situation worsening as they drive, challenging viewers who deny abnormal skies, and reiterate that this is COVID-2.0, the next battlefield, where the oxygen people breathe is poisoned.

Speaker 0 presents several claims about aluminum exposure and environmental contamination. First, they state that peer‑reviewed studies show bees have aluminum levels in their systems that are 70 times higher than what is necessary to cause Alzheimer's or dementia in humans, and they find this alarming given the health implications for bees. They emphasize that this is “70 times more” and frame it as a concern for survival. They challenge the idea that aluminum presence is normal because it is a very abundant element. They assert that aluminum is not found in the environment in free form; it must be mined, refined, and sprayed in order to be scattered widely in the environment. They claim this process is exactly what is happening, and that the issue affects more than just bees: “Every single one of us is being contaminated.” They argue that these materials are bioavailable and accumulate in human systems. They insist that this is a fact regardless of belief, and assert that lab tests prove it. They assert there will be no hiding this issue much longer and touch on the chemical signature found in rain tests. They claim this signature matches coal fly ash, a substance the EPA has said is not harmful. They state that the EPA has been trying to get rid of coal fly ash and that it seems to serve purposes in geoengineering, with evidence increasingly indicating that toxic coal fly ash may be one of the base materials used for spraying. They suggest this provides “plausible deniability.” Overall, Speaker 0 links aluminum exposure in bees to greater human contamination, arguing that environmental aluminum results from a deliberate process of mining, refining, and spraying, rather than natural occurrence. They point to lab tests as proof and to rain-chemical signatures that match coal fly ash as part of the evidence. They further claim the EPA has downplayed the harm of coal fly ash, yet the data suggest it may be employed in geoengineering, which would allow for plausible deniability.

Approximately 50 million tons of aluminum, barium, and strontium are being spread annually on land masses worldwide, with catastrophic consequences. The concentration of aluminum in California soils has dramatically increased, affecting plant growth and potentially accumulating in plant tissue. While the amount sprayed may not immediately kill plants, it can accumulate in the soil and on leaves, potentially migrating into plant tissue and edible parts. This leads to nutrient deficiencies, lower health, and a cascade of negative consequences. The senseless application of aluminum is to blame for these issues.

Please email me at kristenmeghan@gmail.com for more information. To prove the presence of nanoparticulates, collect rain and snow samples and send them to specific labs. It costs around $50. Geoengineering is the most critical issue we face, as it affects our access to food and water, causing respiratory and neurological illnesses. We are overexposed to toxins, including fluoride, which is found in water and food. These systemic effects cannot be metabolized by our bodies. Despite potential losses, I will continue to speak out because I took an oath that I am now honoring.

Speaker 0 states that Girl Scout cookies are a problem. They tested 13 different types of cookies from 25 states, including California, Iowa, and one other state, and the results were published on momsacrossamerica.org. The tests reported 100% positive for glyphosate and 100% positive for heavy metals, at alarming levels. Over 88% of the cookies contained all five of the toxic metals tested: aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead. The speaker notes that some of these toxic metals can leave permanent lifetime damage. They claim that over 80% of the Girl Scout cookies had lead levels higher than what the EPA allows. They also state that the aluminum was up to 300 times higher than the exposure level people are supposed to be exposed to, with aluminum readings described as possibly being in the parts per million range (around 29 parts per million). The speaker suggests a possible source for the high aluminum levels, speculating that it could be related to geoengineering, since aluminum is sprayed to manipulate clouds to create rain, though they say further testing needs to be done on that hypothesis.

Ten years ago, I presented data on undisclosed climate engineering operations, which lacked environmental impact reports. Since then, our organization has invested over $100,000 in testing emissions from aircraft, confirming the presence of aluminum nanoparticles. This issue is now being recognized globally, with discussions among climate scientists about the use of jet aircraft to disperse particles that deflect solar energy. These toxic particles have been detected in rain tests, particularly in Redding, where significant aluminum contamination was noted. Despite ongoing precipitation tests, results have not been disclosed. The environmental impact on soil and ecosystems remains unaddressed, but awareness is growing, with new legislation emerging in states like Tennessee and Florida.

We are just beginning to research the effects of aluminum. There are concerns about the damaging effects of aluminum found worldwide. Some believe geoengineering agendas may have ulterior motives beyond addressing global warming. The debate continues on the need for global governance in geoengineering activities. The possibility of intervening in the climate system by putting particles in the stratosphere is being considered, but caution is advised to prevent negative consequences like ozone destruction. The motivations behind such actions could vary, including financial gain.

In the 20th century, countries seeded clouds for rain, but now the U.S. Military aims to control natural weather. The media is silent due to corporate ownership, but the internet reveals over 150 weather modification programs worldwide. Toxic chemicals are sprayed in the sky, causing health and environmental concerns. Barium and nano aluminum particles in chemtrails harm mammals and interfere with plant growth. Nanoparticles can even penetrate the skin. This information is from the Massachusetts School of Law.

The speaker contrasts GMO sweet corn from the store with heirloom corn, noting the sunflowers turning away from the sun. They claim aluminum levels in the soil are now five to ten times higher than last year. Cucumber and hot pepper plants are not producing as much as in previous years. Normally, the speaker would have excess produce to give away, but this year the garden has suffered the worst. The speaker states they will still be able to maintain operational costs and can enough for their family. However, they claim they won't be able to provide for others as much as in the past.

In this video, the speaker shares alarming figures about the high levels of aluminum found in rainwater and snow on Mount Shasta. The rainwater tested in 2013 contained 13,100 micrograms per liter of aluminum, which is significantly higher than the normal level of 0. Similarly, the snow on Mount Shasta had 61,000 micrograms per liter, four times more than the amount found in the soil. The speaker questions the source of this aluminum, as it is not coming from the soil. They mention that these tests have been conducted worldwide. The speaker also highlights the negative effects of aluminum on essential nutrients and pH levels in plants and humans. They express concern about the impact on agriculture and prioritize this issue over autism and Alzheimer's.

Nanoplastics, aluminum, and barium are being sprayed into the skies as part of a global climate engineering program to cool down the Earth's temperature. However, there are concerns about the potential environmental impacts of these substances. The speaker asks Alexa if nanoparticles and plastics are bad for people's health, but Alexa doesn't have an answer.

This is a federal issue, and the governor's office won't comment. Have you tested rainwater or seen our results? Many here have high levels of barium, aluminum, and strontium in their blood. People are sick and dying. We want ADEQ to take action, investigate, and inform us about the rainwater and our blood. If not from geoengineering, find out where it's from. Thank you. Translation: This is a federal issue, and the governor's office won't comment. Have you tested rainwater or seen our results? Many here have high levels of barium, aluminum, and strontium in their blood. People are sick and dying. We want ADEQ to take action, investigate, and inform us about the rainwater and our blood. If not from geoengineering, find out where it's from. Thank you.

In this video, the speaker shares alarming figures about the levels of aluminum found in rainwater and snow. They mention that in 2013, the rainwater tested showed 13,100 micrograms per liter of aluminum, which is significantly higher than the normal level of 0. The speaker also highlights that the amount of aluminum in the soil has doubled in the last 10 years. They express concern about the impact of aluminum on essential nutrients and mention that nanoparticles are now present in both plants and humans. The speaker concludes by expressing worry about the potential collapse of agriculture.

Speaker 0 and others discuss a perspective that humanity is at a stage similar to the time of Noah, with Nephilim changing humanity. They claim: the only pure humans left on Earth are the unvaccinated, defined as having original God-made DNA unaltered by science. Speaker 2 describes reviewing slides and asserts that every person now has certain anomalies in the blood, which appear in everyone, including themselves, and notes that these anomalies appear when the body decomposes. They state red blood cells are affected and that the anomalies morph into other forms; the changes may occur during the discussion. Speaker 3 describes blood changes post-injection: after vaccination, there is a drastic chain of white nanoparticles entering and causing cells to lose normal round shape, becoming non-smooth and asymmetrical with lumps and protrusions. They label this as an intentional world war on human blood, citing doctors Sherry Timpany and Luke Montagner, and refer to the Nobel Supreme Court of the United States. Speaker 5 asserts that the US Supreme Court has ruled that vaccinated people worldwide are products, patented goods due to a modified DNA or RNA vaccination, making the vaccinated person transhuman and not human under human rights. They claim that there is no rights, freedoms, or religious exemptions for those vaccinated, since they are regarded as property or chattel. They state this applies worldwide and that patents are subject to US law since 2013. Speaker 6 clarifies that chimeras and humanized mice exist in labs, and that genomes are not necessarily differentiated in such models. They discuss the court ruling and explain that a synthetic genome created via mRNA can be patentable, establishing that creating a synthetic genome through genetic modification could confer intellectual property rights. Speaker 7 notes the vaccine discussion connects to the courts and asks what the ruling says; they agree that the holding is that a synthetic genome created with mRNA can be patented, and that vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) involve this concept, questioning how to separate the synthetic genome or DNA in the body from natural genome. Speaker 3 references the Fifth Column’s findings about self-assembling nanotech in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines, claiming nanotech networks in vaccines can control nanomachines, with graphene oxide as a key component. They describe graphene oxide as a power converter that can be activated by frequencies (26 GHz, aligning with 5G), powering nanotech machinery to self-assemble within the body. Speaker 8 argues vaccines are not about a virus but about inserting nanosensors and a wireless body area network (WBAN) into people, with nanosensors embedded in cartilage; claims the testing and nanosensors operate at up to 60 GHz. Speaker 9 discusses a predicted second wave not from the virus but from vaccine-induced injury, compounded by fear and new technology (5G) that could affect voltage-gated calcium channels, potentially making pathogens more permeable. Speaker 10 presents an internal Pfizer document alleging manipulation of mRNA to include a dangerous toxin identified as graphene oxide, claiming billions of nanoparticles per 30-kilogram shot, and contending that COVID-19 vaccines are a bioweapon based on deleted Wuhan databases. Speaker 11 reports aluminum levels in rain and snow samples, claiming high concentrations (13,100 micrograms per liter in rain, 61,000 in snow) and asserting that aluminum is pervasive in the environment. Speaker 12 emphasizes geoengineering as a greater immediate threat, noting heavy metal aerosols in breath and air. Overall, they converge on the central claim that the unvaccinated are the only pure humans remaining, and that vaccination alters DNA, introduces nanotech and graphene oxide, and subjects vaccinated individuals to transhuman status with restricted rights.

The transcript presents a wide-ranging discussion about geoengineering, its methods, alleged environmental and health impacts, and the social, political, and economic consequences of manipulating the climate. - Definitions and methods - Geoengineering is defined as the artificial modification of the Earth's climate. Geoengineers are proposing spraying 10 to 20,000,000 tons of toxic aluminum and other substances into the sky to cool the planet. - Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is described as making the Earth whiter by reflecting sunlight with particles to reduce heat absorption; aluminum and sulfur are discussed as possible reflective agents. It is claimed that model results indicate reflection of sunlight can offset most climate change in most places most of the time, but will damage some places. - Aerosols, including oxides of metals (notably aluminum oxide) and other substances like barium and strontium, are said to function as cloud condensation nuclei, affect precipitation patterns, and interact with atmospheric moisture to influence weather. - Techniques such as cloud seeding and ionospheric heating (including HARP) are described as ways to modify weather by concentrating RF energy, dispersing particulates, or heating the ionosphere to alter jet streams and pressure systems. - Alleged evidence and observations - Observations of chemtrails and a “chemtrail geoengineering footprint” of aluminum, barium, and strontium are presented as widespread, with rain and snow samples allegedly showing these elements and linking them to patents and weather changes. - Reports of environmental changes in forests and soils are cited, including pH shifts toward alkalinity, tree and plant die-offs, and increased fungal infections in crops and ecosystems. - Claims that the sky is rarely blue, global dimming, reduced sunshine, and altered precipitation patterns are linked to aerosol operations and patent-driven goals. - Examples include droughts and floods in various regions, altered storm tracks, and unusual weather events such as anomalous snowfall and temperature swings. - Health, ecology, and agriculture - Alleged health impacts associated with inhaled metals (aluminum, barium, strontium) include rises in asthma, ADHD, autism, and other conditions; cited are concerns from rain- and soil-based studies and observations of changing ecosystems. - Organisms and crops are described as suffering under altered soils (pH changes), increased abiotic stress, and fungal pressures; references are made to Monsanto and GM crops as responses to these stresses, including drought- and flood-tolerance patents. - Organic farmers report declines in crop yields and quality, changes in the viability of basil, cilantro, and tomatoes, and a shift toward greenhouse cultivation to sustain production. - Economic and geopolitical dimensions - Weather is framed as a major driver of commodity markets; weather derivatives are described as financial tools used to hedge or profit from weather-related risk, with potential for immense profits if weather is manipulated. - There is a suggested link between geoengineering research funding (government grants and private funding, including Gates), corporate interests (Monsanto), and the commoditization of weather and food production. Claims include that droughts or floods could boost seed sales and corporate control over agriculture. - The narrative asserts a transfer of wealth and power to a few: corporations and financiers could profit from climate manipulation, while ordinary farmers and populations face food insecurity and market volatility. - Historical context is offered, including references to attempts at weather modification for military ends, the Montréal and NMOD treaties aimed at banning weather warfare, and the notion that domestic exemptions in treaties allow some activities within borders. - Military and governance implications - Weather modification is described as a potential force multiplier in warfare, capable of denying enemy access by creating extreme weather or redirecting storm tracks; historical anecdotes about hurricanes and monsoon manipulation are discussed. - The concept of “owning the weather by 2025” is cited as a military objective, with the idea that environmental manipulation could control battle spaces and influence outcomes. - Debates about sovereignty, accountability, and the ethics of weather control are raised, including concerns about lawsuits, international governance, and the rights of the global population to the atmosphere. - Calls to action and ethics - The speakers advocate public awareness, local-to-global organizing, whistleblowing, and dissemination of information to environmental, farm, health, and media groups. - There is a recurring warning that those who control weather could control food, markets, and political stability, and a lament that the atmosphere and biosphere belong to all of humanity, not to a few corporate or political actors. - Concluding tension - The film presents a tension between scientific capability to engineer climate and the untested, potentially dangerous consequences for ecosystems, health, and equitable access to resources. It emphasizes the need for vigilance, transparency, and public engagement to address possible harms and governance gaps.

The speaker believes that every breath people take is laden with metals. They have concluded that global geoengineering programs pose the greatest and most immediate threat to all living things, second only to nuclear catastrophe.

There are concerns about the accumulation of aluminum in remote parts of the Earth, which is hard to explain. Aluminum was not biologically available before World War II, but it became widespread due to aluminum smelting and its use in cookware and cans. Aluminum can be stored in the brain and has been associated with Alzheimer's and other brain injuries. There are worries that large amounts of bioavailable aluminum are being sprayed into the environment through airplane emissions. Lab tests from around the world have shown the presence of aluminum. In Northern California, there has been a significant increase in aluminum levels in precipitation, leading to altered soil pH values. The source of this aluminum is unclear. There is also discussion about the technical ability to manipulate the climate, which could have unpredictable consequences and potentially lead to war.

Dane Wigginton from GeoengineeringWatch.org provides an update on global contamination caused by solar radiation management and stratospheric aerosol injection. He discusses the lack of air quality testing for fine particulate matter in the nanoparticle range, which is highly toxic to respiratory systems. He invites a PhD scientist, referred to as Joe, to elaborate on the impact of these particles on the soil microbiome, root systems, and plant growth. Joe explains that nano-scale particles are highly reactive and can affect everything due to their size and interactions. He mentions testing for aluminum, barium, and strontium in samples collected from various locations in the Midwest.

Kristen Megan, a former US Air Force environmental specialist and geoengineering whistleblower, argues that the United States has been spraying chemicals into the atmosphere for decades with little regard for public health. She explains that this is now openly admitted in some circles, despite pushback from the EPA. She describes her role in the Air Force as involving tracking hazardous materials from cradle to grave—essentially serving as a forerunner to OSHA and EPA within the military—ensuring that workers and the environment were protected. She says that during her work, she encountered forms (Air Force form 39, inertially linked to MSDS/SDS documents) that listed toxicants she was supposed to approve, which she later realized were the same toxicants they were trying to engineer out of workplaces. She states that she rejected these toxicants, and that this realization came after attempts to debunk the claims, followed by threats. Megan notes that by the time she finished her master’s around 2015, she found explicit references in environmental textbooks indicating that such spraying was occurring, and she regrets having sold the book but cannot locate it now. She contends that the public misperception persists because, even if people doubt it, states have acted as if it is happening. She cites multiple states that have passed laws banning weather engineering, including Florida and Texas, and mentions that legislators have reached out to her and Dane Wiggington over the past few years. She points to government documents available on geoengineeringwatch.org as sources of information. Regarding motivations, Megan cites multiple possible drivers: the ability to control the weather, which can handicap populations; a broader climate-change initiative aimed at dimming the sun and decreasing solar radiation. She characterizes the endeavor as fear-based and financially incentivized through agriculture betting and the potential to handicap people in warfare. On what the spraying entails, she explains the chemicals are heavy alkaline metals and salts that bioaccumulate in the bones and displace potassium, leading to nerve and heart issues, and can mimic a heart attack. She describes exposure through inhalation, dermal absorption, and ingestion, noting dissipation rates depend on humidity and weather patterns. She emphasizes that strontium and barium are among the substances used, and that background elements in drinking water can compound exposure. In closing, Megan reiterates that the practice is ongoing and emphasizes the public health implications, noting that the issue is supported by government documents and advocacy groups like geoengineeringwatch.org. She thanks the interviewer and expresses hope for future discussions.

Aluminum accumulation in remote areas is concerning, as it was not biologically available before World War II. The widespread use of aluminum in industries like aviation and cookware has led to its presence in the brain, linked to Alzheimer's and other brain injuries. The speaker mentions the possibility of large amounts of bioavailable aluminum being sprayed into the environment through airplane emissions. Another speaker confirms the presence of aluminum in lab tests worldwide and shares personal experiences of solar power loss and high levels of aluminum in precipitation. The excessive aluminum has altered soil pH values and is not believed to come from industry or migration. The potential risks and unpredictability of geoengineering are also discussed.

The speakers discuss the potential negative consequences of nanoparticles, specifically aluminum, barium, and strontium. They mention the synergistic toxicity of these elements when combined, particularly aluminum and mercury, which can be up to 100 times worse than their individual toxicity. They also mention Monsanto's engineering of aluminum resistant crops and speculate that it is related to climate engineering operations. The speakers confirm the presence of graphene oxide in the majority of samples collected during these operations.

Since 2006, the snow on Mount Shasta has had five times more aluminum than the soil underneath it. The aluminum content in rainwater should be zero, but when jets are spraying, it can reach up to 13,100 micrograms per liter, which is over ten times the federal safety limits for drinking water. A retired scientist with extensive qualifications confirms these findings and states that aluminum in the soil has doubled in the last ten years. The presence of nanoparticles in plants and humans is causing pH imbalances and blocking essential nutrients. The scientist emphasizes the global scale of this issue and expresses concern about the impact on agriculture. The high levels of aluminum in snow and rainwater are alarming and far exceed safe limits.

In 2013, rainwater tested at 13,100 micrograms per liter of aluminum, a significant increase from previous years. The pH of acid soils has become more alkaline, with aluminum levels doubling in the last decade. Nanoparticles are now present in plants and humans, affecting nutrient absorption. Concerns about the impact on agriculture are greater than worries about autism and Alzheimer's.