TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Russia possesses strong ballistic missile and drone capabilities. Predictions in early 2022 suggested Russia would run out of missiles, but three years later, they are producing and deploying missiles that the United States cannot defend against. The recent strikes demonstrated Russia's ability to destroy Patriot missile batteries. Ukraine fired approximately 20 missiles within two minutes during the strikes, while Lockheed Martin only produces 550 of these missiles annually. Russia's ballistic missile and drone strategy is causing significant attrition of NATO weapons.

We were given a stand with two Max7 machine guns, caliber 7.62. They have performed well, targeting Shakhids and drones. We used them effectively to cover areas and provide square coverage. The effective range is about 1.5-2 km, with a bullet flight distance of around 3800 meters.

Ted Postal, professor emeritus at MIT and expert on nuclear weapons and their delivery systems, discusses the Arashnik/Oreshnik hypersonic system and what is known about its capabilities, limitations, and potential implications. Postal emphasizes that the weapon is a very powerful conventional system, not a nuclear one. He notes that it delivers munitions and, as of the evidence available, seems to inflict damage primarily through kinetic impact. While adding submunitions with high explosives could increase damage per submunition, this would not constitute a game changer unless nuclear weapons were mounted on top of the system. He also cautions that the fact the system can deliver nuclear weapons is not especially novel in the context of existing delivery options, and the main policy concern is the possibility of escalation to nuclear use in response to a conventional attack. Key characteristics he outlines: - The Oreshnik is a one-stage missile that appears to repurpose the first stage of an old SS-20 (Pioneer) intermediate-range missile. The SS-20 was a two-stage missile with three warheads; in the Oreshnik, six buses on the vehicle carry submunitions. - The payload consists of six buses, each carrying about six submunitions, for a total of around 36 submunitions. Each submunition weighs roughly 70–80 kilograms. - The submunitions are delivered from a high-velocity canister that is ejected and then uses a high-pressure gas propulsion system to push out six submunitions onto six separate targets. The vehicle remains oriented to maintain stability, preventing tumbling and ensuring precise deployment. - The submunitions travel at very high speeds (hypersonic) but do not reach hypersonic speed on impact with the ground due to atmospheric reentry dynamics. They hit the ground at approximately 150–200 kilometers per hour, not at Mach 10, because tumbling and aerodynamic drag reduce speed before impact. - Debris analysis suggests the submunitions are not penetrating deep underground; instead, their energy is converted into heat and a violent expansion near the surface, producing an explosion-like effect rather than deep penetration. - The trajectories are lofted, delivering the submunitions to the target area after a long flight time (Russia has claimed 15–17 minutes for submunitions to reach targets). This lofted path reduces the likelihood of interceptors successfully engaging the weapon. On the effects and targeting: - A single submunition’s energy disperses over a footprint rather than concentrating in a single crater. The weapon’s conventional damage is significant, especially when deployed as clusters against a structure or urban area, but it is not equivalent to a nuclear strike. - If six buses with six submunitions each were all directed at a single structure, the resulting destruction would be substantial, but the extent would depend on targeting accuracy and footprint, as well as how many submunitions actually strike the intended area. - Postal notes that a one-kiloton nucleus would create a clearly larger, more devastating area of destruction than the conventional cluster could achieve; meanwhile, a 150–200 kiloton nuclear warhead mounted on Oreshnik would be city-destroying, illustrating how dramatically different outcomes would be with a nuclear payload. Interception and defense: - Postal argues there is no reliable intercept option for this weapon. The high loft and deployment of multiple submunitions after release complicate interception: the submunitions depart the launcher and travel at several kilometers per second above the atmosphere; interceptors would have minutes to react at distances where they would struggle to reach the fast-moving submunitions. - He contrasts this with Iskander, noting that while intercepting Iskander is challenging, the Oreshnik presents a broader, more difficult defense problem due to its trajectory and submunition deployment. Strategic and political context: - The discussion touches on the broader strategic implications, including the psychological impact of a sky lit up by hypersonic activity and the potential for miscalculation leading to nuclear escalation. Postal warns against overestimating the weapon’s nuclear potential and cautions policymakers about proportional responses to conventional attacks. - He critiques public rhetoric and speculative defense concepts (e.g., extreme “golden dome” missile defense schemes) as impractical, arguing that current defenses are unlikely to deter or intercept hypersonic submunition deployments. - The dialogue also reflects on Western economic and political actions, such as sanctions, and suggests that some analyses of the effects on Russia’s economy and strategic posture may mischaracterize outcomes; Postal emphasizes that the weapon’s value lies in its conventional destructive capability and its ability to complicate defense planning, rather than in conventional deterrence or nuclear signaling. - The conversation closes with a stark warning: if thousands of these missiles were deployed, a significant strategic reshaping would follow, necessitating new considerations for air and missile defense, even as existing systems face fundamental limitations in countering hypersonic conventional weapons.

Машина ТОЗ-2 на базе Урала - хорошая для работы, более маневренная, с более дальним дальнобойным огнем. Полностью электронная, автоматически раскладывается и складывается. Работаем по опорным пунктам и живой силе противника. С экипажем работаем второй год, освоили новую машину за месяц с хорошей подготовкой и инструкторами. Translation: The TOZ-2 machine based on the Ural is good for work, more maneuverable, with longer-range firepower. Fully electronic, automatically unfolds and folds. We work on enemy strongholds and forces. With the crew for two years, we mastered the new machine in a month with good training and instructors.

Entering Red Square are the Russian aerospace force troops. Joining the parade are the S 400 Triumph anti aircraft missile systems of the 584 Guards Air Defense Missile Regiment of the Russian Aerospace Force commanded by Major Alexey Kryvorotko. The S 400 system enables Russia to maintain efficient air defense against all types of air and space threats, which has been confirmed during the special military operation.

The airborne laser, known as the ABL, is the world's first airborne directed energy weapon. Its installation involves complex modifications, including removing and retrofitting the entire nose section and installing the world's largest titanium plate to hold the turret-mounted laser. The ABL system is designed to locate, track, and eliminate enemy targets in the air and on the ground. It can stay airborne at 40,000 feet for 5 hours, refuel in mid-air, and destroy a target up to 60 miles away in less than a second.

Ukrainian engineers designed drone launching systems disguised as wooden cabins on cargo trucks. These mobile containers concealed launch platforms, charging stations, and remote-controlled roofs. The design allowed vertical or angled launches, with signal shielding to avoid detection. Operatives moved the trucks into Russia, parking near airbases. Drones were preloaded and launched remotely, guided by live video feeds to targets within a few kilometers. Some drones carried high-explosive warheads. The operation hit at least five major airbases, damaging strategic bombers, including aircraft Russia no longer manufactures. Ukraine struck 34% of Russia's strategic bomber fleet. Targets included strategic nuclear bombers at Belaya Airbase in Siberia, Ivanovo Airbase near Moscow, Dyajalevo Airbase, and naval bases. Over 40 aircraft were reportedly hit. Some drones used fiber optic control systems, immune to jamming, but with limited range. A signal-enhancing drone can counter Russian electronic warfare. The drones are equipped with RPG warheads with piezoelectric triggers. The Tu-160 can release nuclear cruise missiles.

We will continue testing these systems, including in combat conditions, based on the security threats to Russia. We have a supply of these systems ready for deployment.

Real lasers have the advantage of being invisible; you only see the damage as something blows up. The Athena laser system can burn through a truck engine within seconds. Key advantages of lasers include: unlimited ammo, as long as there is power; silent operation, giving the enemy no warning; and travel at the speed of light, delivering powerful force.

The Orishnik missile is described as a state-of-the-art weapon system launched from a massive 12 by 12 truck platform. It is engineered with multiple stages that enable it to reach orbit in a few minutes. A defining capability highlighted is its ability to hit hypersonic speed; once it attains altitude, it transitions into a steep dive, accelerating to hypersonic velocities. During its descent, the missile’s fairing opens to reveal six highly sophisticated warheads. Each warhead is equipped with miniature thrusters at its base, allowing the warheads to maneuver dynamically even as they fall under gravity. This maneuverability enables changes in direction, which is asserted to make it almost impossible for a Patriot missile to hit its target. The description notes that these capabilities are demonstrated in the video ahead.

This is not just a nuclear carrier or nuclear weapons carrier. This is a nuclear missile or nuclear submarine drone. Because it's in the water, it can carry a much larger payload than something flying through the air. So you've got two systems now operating with nuclear reactors in them. This is a whole new level of technology. The US created a nuclear missile once. It was nuclear powered. It was contamination in flight. Everything around was contaminated. They had to back off. They couldn't master the technology. But it was traceable too because of the radiation. It was leaking everywhere. These systems don't leak radiation. They're very effective. And what they are, first of all, just to understand, is they're second strike systems. So if The US, in this case, starts getting feisty and psychotic and tries to because The US, by the way, does have a policy of first strike, whether it's from space or whether it's missile bound or whether it's submarines out of coast. If The US thinks that they can decapitate the Russian leadership and somehow take out all the Russian missiles that are on tracked carriers, on rail carriers, on ships all over the place. But let's assume somehow they decide they can do this. You've got two issues here. One, you've got the Poseidon, which may already be in place or can be launched from a carrier and travel over three, four, five days to get in place and then explode and create a wave. I mean, if they could actually put a 100 megaton explosion, I mean, a city buster missile is one megaton. 10 megatons is something that you wipe out the entirety of something like the size of New York. If they could put a 100 megaton warhead as has been proposed, you'd be facing a 200 meter wave, a 150, 200 meter wave that would destroy most anything in its path. And that considering 80%, almost 80% of the American population lives on either of the East or the West Coast, the majority being on the East Coast, that's one of those vengeance weapons that would just destroy The US effectively as a country. Then you've got the Borovayashnik, which can fly for weeks, months maybe. Who knows nobody knows exactly how long it can actually fly. If tensions are growing very high, you put a five, six, 10 of those up in the air, and they're just doing circles and waiting for command. So the enemy knows that if they do a decapitating strike, they're gonna get wet. They're gonna get a surprise.

Speaker 0: The transcript portrays Putin issuing a chilling World War III threat with a flying Chernobyl-style nuclear weapon. The classified missile is rumored to reach Mach 15, change direction midair, and the Russians believe no one can shoot it down. They’ve already tested earlier versions on Ukraine. Even with high-tech missile defense systems, it cannot be stopped. Russia reportedly has hypersonic missiles that fly hundreds of feet above the ground, alongside ballistic missiles. The speaker asserts the Russians have it all, and that the US says Russia is ahead of us in hypersonic missiles. The Pentagon is described as keeping most powerful capabilities secret, with about two generations of weapons tucked away. The speaker claims Russia has almost a two-to-one nuclear superiority over the US, and that once war starts, nobody wins: even if 95% of missiles are shot down, they would still flatten every city and military base. A classified unnamed ballistic missile is shown dropping many dummy warheads as a demonstration. The narrative references alleged testing in Ukraine and notes a claim that a demonstration MIRV (multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle) was presented: a demonstration that Russia can penetrate defenses and deliver nuclear payloads, though no warheads were involved in that particular display. The speaker recalls Biden announcing long-range cruise missiles, and Putin responding by attacking a missile factory, with subsequent release of photos showing holes in the centers of buildings within the factory. Western media allegedly dismissed these as not powerful missiles, but the speaker counters that it was a MIRV demonstration, and Russia later confirmed the demonstration of capability to field nuclear payloads. The speaker also claims Trump is frustrated with NATO and the EU, accusing them of starting the war with Russia and not wanting it to end. It is stated that Trump decided, over a week prior, not to provide Tomahawks to Zelenskyy. In response, EU and NATO are said to be supplying comparable or more advanced weapons to Ukraine, which would escalate the conflict on the escalatory ladder. Putin is said to be amassing nuclear weapons and attack submarines, with references to maps in the Daily Mail illustrating Russia’s buildup in the Arctic Circle as preparations for war with NATO are described. A segment mentions footage of the Skyfall ballistic missile factory. Speaker 1: Closing outro promoting Infowars, urging followers to connect on X (Twitter) at real Alex Jones and at AJN Live, and to download the Alex Jones app, urging support against the “democrat deep state party” and declaring that they will never be silenced.

О коктейлі Молотова. Тряпка просочена, підпалюється запальничкою або горілкою. Підпалили, добре струсили різкими рухами, щоб тряпка горіла. Обхват має бути правильним, щоб уникнути обливання та горіння. Кидати з розмахом. Якщо тримати неправильно, кидок буде навісом. Добре струшуйте, щоб тряпка не згасла. Перехоплення і в бій. Коли нормально трусиш, тоді все буде добре. English translation: About the Molotov cocktail. The rag is soaked and lit with a lighter or torch. Once lit, shake well with sharp movements to ensure the rag burns. The grip must be correct to avoid being splashed and burned. Throw with a swing. If held incorrectly, the throw will be lobbed. Shake well so the rag doesn't go out. Re-grip and into battle. When you shake normally, everything will be fine.

Directed energy weapons, such as lasers and microwaves, have been developed by the United States, Russia, China, India, the UK, and Iran. Turkey was the first to deploy this technology in combat. Defense Secretary Mark Esper announced that China and Russia have weaponized satellites with directed energy weapons. There have been concerns about these advanced weapons causing the unprecedented fires in recent years. Laser-based weapons can destroy targets with external heat, while microwave weapons penetrate targets and ignite internal electronics. Satellite imagery shows an equal distance spread of fires starting within the same four hours, raising questions about the cause. Additionally, a beam of light seen in infrared spectrum appears to excite the heat signature of fires in California and Oregon. The timing of the deployment of these weapons is notable, leading to speculation about potential attacks with directed energy weapons.

In 2016 Russia announced a new type of torpedo called Poseidon. It is 20 meters long and 2 meters in diameter, three times the size of a conventional torpedo. This torpedo uses a small nuclear reactor as propulsion, and it has a limited range. Poseidon is expected to carry a 2 megaton nuclear warhead. It can be launched from a submarine or from a special vessel. Poseidon travels slowly and is not easily detected, moving underwater before it detonates. The nuclear explosion would cause radioactive contamination and could have long-term effects.

A single Trident II missile launched at Moscow, with all 8 warheads targeting the same area, would yield approximately 3.8 megatons of TNT. The explosion would create a fireball covering over 10 square kilometers, vaporizing everything nearby, while buildings would be destroyed within an 11-kilometer radius. Thermal radiation could cause severe burns up to 22 kilometers away, affecting over 1500 square kilometers. The estimated immediate casualties would exceed 2.8 million fatalities and 4.6 million injuries. The U.S. has 14 Ohio-class submarines, each capable of carrying 20 Trident II missiles, totaling 280 missiles and 2,240 warheads. The combined explosive power is about 1,064 megatons of TNT, equivalent to over 70,000 Hiroshima bombs, always ready for deployment.

Thermite devices purportedly exist for building demolitions and can be found via Google search. Thermite cutting charges are quieter than RDX explosives, using thermal heating to melt steel. Infrared overflights detected 1,400-degree Fahrenheit hotspots at ground zero for a week. Thermite could explain why fires at ground zero couldn't be extinguished, as they burned deep within the pile in oxygen-starved environments. Thermite contains its own oxygen within the metallic oxide, allowing the incendiary reaction to occur even underwater.

Russia is quietly deploying a smart artillery shell that doesn't need GPS and is changing the game in Ukraine. The Krasnopal M2 is a 152 millimeter projectile also available in 155 millimeter variants with semi active laser guidance that locks on to laser marked targets typically spotted by drones. It boasts pinpoint accuracy within two meters, a 50 kilogram frame, and a high explosive fragmentation warhead designed to demolish armored vehicles, fortifications, and command hubs. Its effective range hits 26 kilometers, stretching to 30 kilometers with advanced long barrel howitzers like the two s 19 Mistah s, two a 65 Mistah b, or two s 43 Malva. A standout feature, it operates without reliance on GPS or GLONASS rendering it resilient against electronic jamming in today's high stakes electronic warfare environment. On the front lines in Eastern and Southern Ukraine, these munitions have proven lethal against top tier western armor with a drone integration cutting the time from target detection to impact dramatically. This development highlights Russia's doctrinal evolution focusing on swift selective firepower and self reliant tech amid ongoing sanctions. As Bekhan Ozdoyev, head of Rostec's weapons cluster notes, the ability to produce and deploy high precision selective fire systems is today one of the keys to ensuring tactical and strategic superiority on the battlefield. In a grueling war of attrition, the Krasnopold m two enhance Russia's edge, enabling more efficient evasive operations that challenge countermeasures.

The transcript reports that Russia has completed tests of the Burovesnik missile, with launches slated for 2027. It is described as a doomsday weapon that is rewriting global security, and the speaker asks why Russia built it and what makes it a game changer. The Burovesnik is propelled by a solid-fuel booster and a nuclear air-breathing jet, and during tests it covered a distance of 14,000 kilometers in fifteen hours. It is described as subsonic and capable of operating at high or low altitudes. The weapon is said to have the ability to loiter for months with unlimited range, and it carries a one megaton warhead, which the speaker equates to 70 Hiroshima bombs, ensuring devastating retaliation. Development of the missile reportedly began in 2001 after the United States abandoned the ABM treaty. The missile is described as being sized like the KH-one 101 cruise missile, and it is characterized as a vengeance weapon targeting critical infrastructure. According to the speaker, its endless flight time disrupts the strategic balance and is an alarm to the West. The Burovesnik is described as ground-launched with no carrier needed, delivering precision strikes with a payload range of 50 kilotons to one megaton, stated as the equivalent of 70 Hiroshima bombs. It is presented as a response to US Tomahawks in Europe or Ukraine, and as a key lever in new START talks. The transcript notes that Russia could ramp up production if the treaty ends. The speaker ends with a promo-style call to action, saying not to miss the next big reveal and to follow new rules, geopolitics on X, or cutting edge geopolitical updates, implying ongoing updates about this missile and related strategic developments.

There are rumors of a thermobaric bomb, similar to a vacuum bomb, being used in Europe. The US has used this type of bomb in Afghanistan before. However, the idea of it being used in Europe is uncertain.

Ukrainians are not superheroes and face casualties on a daily basis. Today, I will show you unique videos of Russians destroying Ukrainian equipment. "This is an American m triple seven howitzer." "The Russian UAV hits the exact target and destroys the howitzer." "The rare and valuable SAM has been destroyed." "The UAV dives and hits the target." "This is a Polish AHS Crab Self Propelled Artillery Unit. The hit causes fire and destroys the launcher." "A battery of Ukrainian S-three 100 SAMs." "A kamikaze drone strike on the installations leads to a powerful explosion and the destruction of an adjacent installation." "Everything that you saw earlier was the work of the Russian Zala Lancet UAV." "At least 250 different pieces of equipment were destroyed by Russians using it." "The range of such a warhead drone is about 70 kilometers." "Lancets are launched with a metal rail." "The Russians are increasingly using lancets."

Speaker describes Russia’s nuclear underwater weapon project, the Status Six oceanic multipurpose system, codenamed Poseidon. Public reports begin in September 2015. Poseidon is an unmanned torpedo-shaped drone that can be loaded onto and launched by a submarine, or remain dormant in a box on the ocean floor until activated. Once armed, it has a range of 10,000 kilometers and travels slowly across the ocean for weeks or months to avoid detection, then accelerates to over 100 miles per hour when near an enemy coastline to detonate its nuclear bomb before detection. The bomb carried by Poseidon is allegedly the most powerful nuclear device ever created, capable of 200 megatons of explosive power and detonated underwater. For comparison, the Tsar Bomba, the largest tested nuclear device, was 50 megatons. The Poseidon bomb is described as a cobalt bomb designed to unleash more radioactive fallout than a normal nuclear bomb, making the resulting wave both enormous and highly radioactive. A 200-megaton underwater detonation is said to unleash a 500-meter-high tsunami toward an enemy coastline, far taller than most structures. The comparison notes that the Empire State Building would be minuscule beside such a wave, and even the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami maxed at about 30 meters, which Poseidon’s 500-meter wave would exceed by a wide margin. The tsunami would deliver catastrophic devastation, with highly radioactive water contaminating ground and drinking water. The transcript states that the Russian Navy has allegedly ordered 30 Poseidon armed drones, with half assigned to the Northern Fleet in the Arctic Ocean and half to the Pacific Fleet based in Vladivostok. Poseidon is described as a weapon of last resort, intended to be used only when all other hope in a war seems lost, and once initiated there is “never any going back.” The speakers emphasize Poseidon’s purpose as a last-ditch option designed to circumvent capable US and European missile defense systems. The description includes a hypothetical modeling finding from the University of Washington: a 100-megaton underwater detonation off the coast of Long Island would flood Long Island, New York City, and portions of surrounding states; Poseidon’s 200-megaton capacity would double that destructive potential, creating a far larger, more radioactive flood. The overall portrayal frames Poseidon as an extraordinarily powerful, nuclear underwater weapon with dramatic strategic implications, reserved for extreme scenarios.

The GBU 57 bunker buster is a 13.6-ton bomb designed to destroy underground fortresses. Dropped from 30,000 meters, it penetrates 60 meters of concrete upon impact due to its speed and design. The bomb's forged steel alloy resists heat and pressure, maintaining its solid form during impact. Adjustable tail fins ensure missile-like precision, calculating the angle and speed of the dive. A special fuse delays the explosion, allowing the bomb to burrow deep underground. Some versions explode in stages: drilling a hole, pushing the warhead deeper, and then detonating.

Mario and the Colonel discuss the latest developments in the Ukraine-Russia conflict and their implications for peace negotiations and the battlefield. - The hosts walk through conflicting claims about an alleged Ukrainian drone attack on Putin’s residence, timed with Zelenskyy’s meeting with Trump. Ukraine denied the claims; Russia asserted the opposite; a CIA report then said the drones targeted a Russian military base in the region and that this wasn’t the first time such a base had been targeted. The Colonel notes that all sides may be using disinformation, and no one can say with authority what happened. He emphasizes that what matters is how each side uses the information to bolster its position and public support, including Lavrov’s stated threat of retaliation. He argues the military reality on the ground continues to be unfavorable for Ukraine, and that Russia will use any incident to justify gains or concessions on its terms. - On negotiations, the 90–95% of an agreement reportedly already accepted is contrasted with two sticking points: security guarantees and territory. Zelenskyy is said to be nearing some form of security guarantee solution, but Donbas territorial concessions remain unresolved. The Colonel suggests evaluating who benefits from the alleged incident; if true, it could be used to sabotage peace talks. He notes competing narratives: Ukraine seeks to portray Russia as untrustworthy, while Russia portrays Ukraine as the aggressor and untrustworthy, both using the incident to justify their positions. He questions whether any side actually benefits, proposing that Russia might use the event domestically to rally support and push negotiations toward its terms. - The discussion moves to strategic weapons and timing. They note the Arashnik missiles in Belarus, described as nuclear-capable, with high speed and multiple warheads. The Colonel says Russia has signaled willingness to escalate but would likely reserve Arashniks for decisive moments or major escalations, possibly a clash with NATO, rather than using them routinely. He cites Putin’s statements about negotiating or taking actions by force and explains that Russia’s leadership appears to have reached a point where battlefield gains could be prioritized if diplomacy stalls. - On Ukraine’s ability to advance, the Colonel argues that Russia prioritizes territorial gains but is not constrained by time, with large manpower advantages and sustained firepower. He asserts Russia’s advance has accelerated over 2024–2025 and could continue, potentially enabling breakthroughs even if the Donbas remains a long-term objective. He contrasts this with potential Ukrainian vulnerabilities, including troop losses, desertions, and mobilization limits, suggesting Ukraine could face a collapse in the front line by spring or summer, though there is uncertainty about exact outcomes. - Regarding Ukraine’s effort to disrupt Russia’s economy by targeting the Black Sea fleet and shipping, the Colonel is skeptical that such actions would decisively affect Russia, given Russia’s diversification away from sea-based revenues and Ukraine’s parallel economic strains, including power shortages and refineries. He emphasizes that neither side’s economic measures have produced a decisive effect, and that Russia has prepared countermeasures. - Trump’s post claiming that “Putin’s attack bluster” shows Russia stands in the way of peace is discussed. The Colonel says Trump is echoing Western lines and that such rhetoric will not by itself alter the course of negotiations; an eventual settlement requires both sides to agree on terms, not slogans. - On possible Russian retaliation, the Colonel suggests targeted responses within Kyiv’s power sector or leadership and possibly infrastructure, but he cautions against predicting escalation, noting Russia’s risk-averse tendencies and potential to strike second- and third-tier Ukrainian leaders or critical infrastructure if deemed necessary for domestic purposes. - Looking ahead twelve months, the Colonel predicts continued war, potential major battlefield moves with accelerating territorial changes, and the possibility of a breakthrough or a sharp escalation. He warns that a purely defensive posture will not win and that the pace of Russian advances could lead to significant shifts by late 2026, with Donbas negotiations remaining unsettled. He concludes that the conflict is likely to continue, with hybrid warfare and broader Western responses shaping developments.

На пусковой установке зенитно-ракетной системы С-350 Витязь, успешно демонстрируемой в зоне СВО. По большой пачке РСЗО HIMARS шло «порядка 12-16 целей»; комплекс «успешно справился, ни одной цели не достигло своей точки». Цель захвачена на дальности «порядка 90 километров», подпустив ближе, «устойчиво сопровождая была поражена на дальности порядка 70 километров». Ракета маневрирует параллельно цели. По нам применяется и АТАК МС и РСЗО HIMARS. Цели были успешно поражены. Это «один из новейших образцов вооружения Российской Федерации». Комплекс имеет зенитно-управляемые ракеты с головками самонаведения, «высокую мобильность, маневренность». Комплекс имеет автономную систему питания, ему «не обязательно привязываться к системам свэп». Разброс дивизиона повышает живучесть экипажей. С момента обнаружения до поражения цели — «от полутора до трех секунд», как при участии оператора, так и в автоматическом режиме. «Автоматический режим у данного комплекса работает идеально, не было совершено в данном режиме ни одного лишнего пуска ракеты и все цели были успешно поражены»。 At the launcher site of the S-350 Vityaz air defense system, successfully demonstrated in the zone of the SVO. For a large batch of HIMARS MLRS there were «about 12-16 targets»; the complex «successfully coped, not a single target reached its point». The target was captured at a distance of «about 90 kilometers» and, by approaching closer, was «consistently engaged at a distance of about 70 kilometers». The missile maneuvers parallel to the target. For us, ATAK MS and HIMARS MLRS were used. The targets were successfully destroyed. This is «one of the newest samples of weapons of the Russian Federation». The system is equipped with guided missiles with homing heads, «high mobility, maneuverability». The system has an autonomous power supply; it «does not have to be tied to SWEP systems». The division’s dispersion increases crew survivability. From detection to destruction — «from one and a half to three seconds», whether with operator involvement or in automatic mode. «Automatic mode of this complex works perfectly, there has not been a single extra rocket launch in this mode, and all targets were successfully destroyed».