reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A speaker asserts that “a dangerous subversive elite has managed to infiltrate the highest levels of Western institutions and governments to implement the criminal plan of the agenda 2030.” The claim continues that, “in many self proclaimed democratic states, devices denouncing this global coup are being silenced through censorship, intimidation, psychiatricisation and even arrest.” The speaker frames a broad consolidation of power as a totalitarian shift quietly taking hold “in Europe, Canada, Australia, and other vassal nation of the United Nations, NATO, World Health Organization, and World Economic Forum.” A focal point of the message is the case of a private entity founder named in the speech: “all private entity founded by the same powers is lawyer Reiner Fulmisch, unjustly imprisoned and still awaiting for a fair trial.” The speaker states that Fulmisch’s “crime is having dared to speak the truth in a world of criminal lies.” The appeal follows to a moral appeal: “I call on Catholics and all people of goodwill to raise their voices in defense of those persecuted by the globalist regime.” The speaker explicitly shifts responsibility away from Fulmisch, declaring, “It is not attorney Fulmish who should be imprisoned, but those who committed the greatest crime ever against humanity.” A list of individuals is named as principal actors behind the alleged crimes: “Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Claus Schwab, George Soros, Ursula von der Leyen, Albert Burla, and all their accomplices and emissaries, especially those in institutional positions.” The statement closes with a direct call: “Free Reinhard Fulmisch.” The language presents a stark framing of persecution, accusing a defined group of leading a globalist operation and portraying Fulmisch as a victim of this alleged regime. The speaker emphasizes the urgency of collective action and solidarity among believers and “people of goodwill” to resist the described oppression and to advocate for Fulmisch’s release.

- The conversation opens with a discussion of escalating dynamics in the Ukraine conflict as a new year begins, focusing on how the rules of war have shifted over the past four years, including the depth of NATO involvement and when actions cross into direct war. The speakers note that political leadership has largely been exempt from the war, but Russia has had opportunities to strike Ukrainian leaders that have been avoided, raising questions about future targets and the diplomatic path. - Speaker 1 argues that the political leadership has indeed been outside the war, and that voices inside Russia are growing more critical. They challenge the Western portrayal of Vladimir Putin as a dictator, suggesting Putin has restrained destruction that could hit the West, and asserting that the West and Zelenskyy have grown comfortable with exemptions. They warn that continued escalation could lead to a nuclear conflict with Europe at risk due to its geographic compactness, citing the potential fallout from attacks on American nuclear bases and the broader geopolitical consequences. - The discussion moves to the potential consequences of Western strikes on energy infrastructure and frontline energy targets, including refineries and civilian vessels. The speakers examine how Russia might respond if its assets are attacked at sea or in the Black Sea, and the possibility of Russia forcing Ukraine to lose access to the Black Sea through strategic military actions. The analysis includes a few provocative specifics: British and European actors allegedly orchestrating or enabling attacks, the role of third-country-flagged ships, and the idea that reflagging to Russian flags could be treated as an act of war by Russia. - The dialogue delves into the operational dynamics of the Mediterranean and Black Sea theatres, noting incidents such as sunflowers and other oil cargo damage, the Caspian transit company's facilities, and the implications for Turkish oil revenue and Western economies. The speakers argue that Western powers are drawing in broader international actors and that the war could expand beyond Ukraine, potentially dragging in NATO ships and submarines in a conflict at sea. They warn that if escalation continues, it could trigger a broader, more destructive war in Europe. - The conversation shifts to the likely trajectory of the battlefield, with Speaker 1 offering a grim assessment: the Donbas front and the Zaporozhye region are nearing collapse for Ukrainian forces, with Russian forces dominating missile and drone capabilities and outmaneuvering on three axes. The analysis suggests that within two to three months, upper-river-front areas, including the Zaporozhzhia and surrounding Donbas fronts, could be fully compromised, leaving only a few large urban pockets. The absence of civilian protection and the encirclement of cities would accelerate Ukrainian withdrawals and surrender, while Russia could enhance pressure on remaining fronts, including Donbas and Sumy, Kharkiv, and Dnieper regions, as weather and terrain favor Russian movements. - The speakers discuss the impact of collapsing command posts and morale, likening the abandonment of Gudai Poia to a sign of impending broader collapse, with open terrain making Ukrainian forces vulnerable to rapid Russian breakthroughs. They suggest that strategic fortifications will be overwhelmed as the front line collapses and supply lines are severed, with a predicted sequence of encirclements and city sieges. - The US role is analyzed as both a negotiator and strategist, with the assertion that the United States has long led the proxy dimension of the conflict and continues to influence targeting and weapons delivery. The discussion questions the coherence of US policy under Trump versus Biden, arguing the conflict remains a US-led enterprise despite attempts to reframe or outsources it. The speakers describe the US as hedging its bets through ongoing military support, budgets, and intelligence cooperation, while insisting that Ukraine remains a core objective of US hegemony. - A critical examination of European Union leadership follows, with strong claims that the EU is increasingly tyrannical and undemocratic, sanctioning dissidents andSuppressing speech. The dialogue condemns the deplatforming of individuals and argues that the EU’s leadership has undermined diplomacy and negotiated peace, instead pushing toward a broader confrontation with Russia. The speakers suggest that several European countries and elites are pursuing escalating policies to maintain power, even at the risk of deepening European instability and economic collapse. - The conversation ends with reflections on broader historical patterns, invoking Kennan’s warnings about NATO expansion and the risk of Russian backlash, and noting the potential for the EU to fracture under pressure. The participants acknowledge the risk of a wider conflict that could redefine global power and economic structures, while expressing concern about censorship, deplatforming, and the erosion of diplomacy as barriers to resolving the crisis. They conclude with a cautious note to prepare for worst-case scenarios and hope for, but not rely on, better circumstances in the near term.

Hungary's authoritarian leader Viktor Orban is meeting with Republicans in Washington to push for an end to US military aid to Ukraine. This aligns with the growing alliance between America's far right wing and Europe's, as seen earlier this year when Orban hosted high-profile MAGA supporters at CPAC Hungary. Orban's remarks at the event revealed his opposition to LGBTQ rights and "woke culture," while promoting Hungary as an incubator for conservative policies. It's no surprise that American right-wing figures, including Tucker Carlson, have been supportive of Orban's fascist dictatorship. This alliance poses a threat to democracy and plays into the hands of Putin, who favors Orban's policies. President Biden, on the other hand, will be hosting Ukraine's president at the White House.

We are facing immense crises in the European Union. War has returned to our territory, and we need the EU more than ever. However, the far-right is gaining success in elections, with figures like Mr. Wilders campaigning against Muslims, immigration, and even the European Green Deal. If we don't wake up and realize the gravity of the situation, if we don't find the strength to convince others that we need to save the EU, it is in danger of extinction. There is a combination of external and internal threats that we have never seen before in European history. The upcoming election is crucial and decisive. Putin's plan to pressure and weaken Europe is succeeding.

The speaker discusses the Alternative for Germany (AFD) party's experiences, claiming the party has faced media labeling, social exclusion, and economic hardship for its members. They state that the AFD's rise in popularity has led to increased institutional measures against them, including being labeled as extremist by the intelligence service. The speaker claims that the EU is a Soviet-style bureaucratic system disturbing free markets and democratic processes. They thank Elon Musk for providing an alternative to mainstream media, which they allege is government-funded and biased. They believe Germany is on the wrong path, particularly regarding energy policy and its stance on the Ukraine conflict. The speaker worries about the possibility of the AFD being banned and its leaders imprisoned, but remains hopeful that the German people will see through what they describe as a facade. They express concern over the undermining of democratic processes and the exclusion of the AFD from parliamentary representation.

We are facing immense crises in the European Union. War has returned to our territory, and we need the EU more than ever. However, the far-right is gaining success in elections, with figures like Mr. Wilders campaigning against Muslims, immigration, and even the European Green Deal. If we don't realize the gravity of the situation and find the strength to convince others of the need to save the EU, it is in danger of extinction. We are facing both external and internal threats, unlike anything we have seen before. The upcoming election is crucial and decisive for our history. Putin's plan to pressure and weaken Europe is succeeding.

We are facing immense crises in the European Union. War has returned to our territory, and we need the EU more than ever. However, the far-right is gaining success in elections, with figures like Mr. Wilders campaigning against Muslims, immigration, and even the European Green Deal. If we don't wake up and realize the gravity of the situation, if we don't find the strength to convince others that we need to save the EU, it is in danger of collapse. There is a combination of external and internal threats that we have never seen before in European history. The upcoming election is crucial and decisive. Putin's plan to pressure and weaken Europe is working.

Europe is not preparing for war, but for collapse, and elites are not gearing up for war with Russia because they care about freedom. They are doing it because their grip on power is slipping, economies are breaking, and the middle class is crushed. Hungary was sanctioned for refusing to send money to Ukraine, and Slovakia and Poland are breaking rank. The AFD is rising in Germany, and France is trying to stop Marine Le Pen. These are the voices of the people, and that terrifies the establishment. Elites crank up the fear, blame Russia, and push for war to cover for their own failures. The threat is coming from within, from the millions of people across Europe and the US who are done being lied to, used, and ignored. The media repeats the same script every day, and Trump is punching holes straight through it. The solution is to speak the truth, ask the right questions, and stop playing along.

There is an unknown group of "globalitarian misanthropists" calling the shots, not figures like Ursula von der Leyen, Bill Gates, or Klaus Schwab. Elected governments are merely puppets implementing their plans, which seems to be erecting a one-world government. This would transform free societies into a collectivism where individuals are malleable parts. The EU is a stepping stone towards this one-world government. Europeans would never surrender national sovereignty directly, so the EU institutions were created under the pretext of preventing wars. By relinquishing competencies to the EU, it conditions Europeans to accept a one-world government.

The speaker discusses the Alternative for Germany (AFD) party's experience with media labeling them as right-wing extremists, leading to social exclusion and economic hardship for party members. Despite this, the AFD has grown in popularity, reaching 26% in polls and over 40% in Eastern Germany. The speaker criticizes Germany's intelligence service for labeling the AFD as extremist for holding conservative views. They also express concern over the EU's bureaucratic system and its impact on democratic processes. The speaker thanks Elon Musk for providing an alternative to mainstream media, which they claim is government-funded and biased. They lament Germany's energy policy, particularly the shutdown of nuclear power plants, and criticize Chancellor Merkel's green policies. The speaker believes the AFD represents normal conservative values and offers a perspective of freedom and wealth. They express worry about the possibility of the party being banned and its leaders imprisoned, drawing parallels to situations in Romania and the treatment of Donald Trump. They advocate for peace in Ukraine and criticize Germany's support for the war.

My name is Eva Wagner Rook, an activist and political commentator. Europe is under attack from a globalist agenda aiming for a one-world government, ruling by fear. The state should serve its citizens, not control them. We must reject this communist influence and protect our private lives. Remember the Dutch farmers who fought against their government stealing their land? This is about control—whoever controls food controls people. Demographic changes in Europe are significant, with bureaucrats deciding our future against the people's will. The so-called great replacement theory is now a reality. Our elites have declared war on us, and it’s time to fight back with determination. Thank you.

Europeans have no real chance to influence political dynamics and are forced to follow seemingly absurd orders from the top of the European Union. These orders are actually formulated by usurious Masonic oligarchies in control of organizations like the World Economic Forum, UN, NATO, Bilderberg, and others. Whether it's about digital wallets, carbon credits, migration flows, or beach concessions, the result is the same: the people have no say and are instead oppressed, robbed, and humiliated. Any opposition is ignored and crushed under the tanks of retaliation, censorship, and political correctness. This totalitarian, materialistic Europe, built on the legalized fraud of the euro and public debt, was intentionally created to gradually weaken national sovereignty, attack economies, ethnic identity, and age-old traditions. It aims to dismantle the old continent and establish a new world order by 2050, with a central government, a single currency, a common language, and a universal religion, all under the guise of happy degrowth, transhumanism, and hyper-surveillance. The globalist elites hold the power.

The European Union is pressuring tech companies to censor content secretly, with Elon Musk's x being the only one resisting. The EU is threatening x with fines for not complying. Governments and intelligence agencies are involved in demanding censorship, while spreading their own disinformation. X's community notes system allows for corrections to false information, unlike what the EU claims. Musk's refusal to censor is crucial for free speech. To fight back, share the video, join the email list, and support the free speech movement. Stand up against foreign interference in free speech.

RT is funding right-leaning bloggers and YouTube personalities, including Jordan Peterson and Tucker Carlson. The purpose is to amplify messages that destabilize democracies.

Speakers describe a pattern where Europe’s populist leaders—Orban, Fitschau, AFD’s Alice Austria, the FPO, Simeon in Romania—are labeled right-wing extremists, censored, and isolated by a 'cordon sanitaire,' with Argentina facing media attacks 'to another level.' They blame a 'great despair of progressive approach' since May '68, arguing the left has dissolved societies, eroded national sovereignty, and bans on elections. Behind the playbook are 'ideological inertias' and 'globalist associations' aligned with the 'UN 2030 agenda' and Brussels, which they say threatens Europe’s identity. They credit Trump with energizing the movement; Vox’s 'Make Spain Big Again' and support from Trump and Elon Musk. Vox faces unequal TV coverage, heavy fines, and campaigns to label 'fake news creators.' Immigration policy: 'borders sacred for us,' illegals must leave, citizenship by language/culture, and removal for serious crimes. They advocate regulated immigration, natalist policies, and a strong Atlantic link; see Europe reassert sovereignty in 10 years.

We will fight this battle on multiple fronts: legislatively, in the courts, and in the streets. There are powerful foreign banks and intelligence agencies trying to conquer America, but we must recognize the evil behind them. Figures like Hakeem Jeffries are calling for violence, and we must be aware of their intentions. The fight against these globalists is about survival for them, and they will fight harder as they face losing power. Recent political shifts in Europe show that their control is slipping. We are in a critical moment where we must remain vigilant against their tactics. Meanwhile, support for our cause through purchases at the Alex Jones store helps fund our movement and offers great products.

We are facing immense crises in the European Union. War has returned to our territory and we need the EU more than ever. However, the far-right is gaining success in elections, with figures like Mr. Wilders campaigning against Muslims, immigration, and even the European Green Deal. If we don't wake up and realize the gravity of the situation, if we don't find the strength to convince others that we need to save the EU, it is in danger of extinction. We are facing both external and internal threats like never before in European history. The upcoming election is crucial and decisive. Putin's plan to pressure and weaken Europe is succeeding.

I wanted to quickly highlight the concerning connections between those challenging Kalin Georgescu's presidential candidacy in Romania and Avaz, a Soros-funded NGO known for censoring dissenting voices in the EU. This NGO proudly admits to suppressing right-wing groups and conservative viewpoints across Europe, even interfering in Spain's elections. A key figure in challenging Georgescu's candidacy is connected to the National School for Political Sciences and Administration in Romania and is a vocal advocate for online censorship, even quoting Avaz in support of their work. Shockingly, Avaz is responsible for creating the Digital Services Act in the EU, the very foundation for censorship policies across Europe, including the restrictive bills in Romania. This is alarming, especially considering previous threats to interfere with Romanian elections.

I want to show you the connections between those trying to block Kalin Georgescu's presidential candidacy and a Soros-funded NGO responsible for EU censorship. This NGO aims to stop Donald Trump, take down Elon Musk, and censor right-wing voices. They even interfered in Spain's elections in 2023, blasting banners against the Vox party leader and urging alliances against them. The person challenging Georgescu's candidacy is connected to Alina Bordoano, a teacher and dean who promotes online censorship, believing people can't handle too much information. She supports Avaz, the NGO behind the Digital Services Act, which is the foundation for censorship bills in the EU and Romania. This is highly interesting because Thierry Breton has suggested that if things go south, they'll cancel elections. Censorship bills are expected to happen everywhere.

The future of Western civilization is in the balance. In Europe, political opposition is being jailed and free speech is under assault. Republicans and conservatives believe the fundamental values and tenants of Western civilization that the country has been built on are under assault. The November election was the beginning of the pushback on that assault, but it's not over.

Europe is not preparing for war, but for collapse, and this is not about defending democracy. Elites in France, Germany, and the UK are preparing for war with Russia because their grip on power is slipping due to failing economies and a crushed middle class. They sanctioned Hungary for refusing to send more money to Ukraine. Slovakia is breaking rank, Poland is pushing back, and the AFD is rising in Germany. The establishment calls these movements extremist and tries to erase them because they are the voices of the people. They blame Russia and push for war to cover their failures. The threat is coming from within, from people tired of being lied to. The media repeats the same script, but Trump punches holes in it. The solution is to speak the truth, ask questions, and stop playing along, because when enough people refuse to lie, the machine breaks.

We've found that the World Economic Forum is pushing a super globalist agenda, attempting to create a new world order that undermines the sovereignty of countries and our democracy. This organization, along with the UN, is controlled by the same ideas and oligarchs. They're creating leaders who will be elected by us, but these individuals are not employees of their people. They try to control people by salary and offers, ensuring they are politically correct. They aim to maintain a global rules-based order and compact dangerous extremist views on the internet to minimize the spread of misinformation and shape a great reset, believing nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. This involves a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of our world.

The atmosphere in the European Parliament is tense. Colleagues are realizing they are not serving the people's best interests. They feel the government is controlled by global elitists, not the people. People are no longer fooled by climate change narratives, and the truth is starting to come to light.

Pattern across European leaders: they’re all labeled as right wing extremists, censored, isolated—a Cordon sanitaire. The discussion cites Romania (election canceled) and Germany (AFD labeled an “extremist organization”). Speaker 1 says: “a great despair of progressive approach and progressive politicians. They have dominated the scene, at least in the last sixty years... They have dissolved the societies. They have instilled sovereignty from the nations.” The dialogue describes a globalist agenda with the UN 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals, Brussels, and a replacement of Europe, plus efforts to punish national sovereignty. Trump’s influence is described as transformative: a “revolution of common sense,” with Vox highlighting “Make Spain Big Again.” On immigration, the stance is: “Spain is our property… borders sacred… walls make good neighbors… immigration must be regulated based on national economy,” and “illegal entry must leave.” Nationality should be lost for crimes; language and culture matter. NGOs and funding are criticized; USAID, Soros, Open Arms are cited. Tariffs are viewed as defending the American, not Spanish, interest; Europe should remain Atlantic-aligned and Europe should become Europe again.