TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We can't air unverified information. You mentioned before that discrediting me helps when I say negative things about you. But you’ve discredited yourself by focusing on trivial matters instead of serious questions about Hunter Biden's financial dealings. The story about Hunter's laptop, linked to Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani, is being treated as a major issue. It's crucial to investigate whether a presidential candidate is corrupt, especially regarding money from foreign entities. You dismiss this as unverified, but the laptop exists. Why not discuss the significant allegations instead of insignificant topics?

We received unverified narratives from Ukraine, passed them to John Solomon, who then appeared on Fox News with Sean Hannity. Giuliani started collaborating with Russian agents in May or June 2019, spreading lies for Putin. Mainstream media doubted us, but Fox News and some right-wing outlets promoted the false claims. Politicians like Ron Johnson and Pete Sessions also helped push the Russian agenda against Joe Biden.

FBI Special Agent Elvis Chan informed Twitter and other social media platforms about a potential hack and leak operation before the 2020 presidential election, despite having no evidence. The government had possession of Hunter Biden's laptop for a year and pre-bunked the story that eventually came out. The Aspen Institute held a tabletop exercise to prepare for a story about Hunter Biden and Burisma, with journalists and big tech executives present. The exercise aimed to discount and censor the story. Fifty-one former intelligence officials signed a letter claiming the laptop story was Russian disinformation, with the intention of helping Joe Biden win the election. This coordinated effort to suppress information is concerning and undermines democracy.

The speaker states that the "Russian story" would be called a covert influence campaign if they were doing it. The speaker also claims they would be the last to say they've never tried a covert influence campaign.

Mike Morell, former CIA director, emailed John Brennan, Obama's CIA director, just before a debate between Trump and Biden regarding the Hunter Biden laptop. Morell asked Brennan to sign a letter because he was, quote, "trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue." The letter in question is the one from 51 intelligence professionals that claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. Morell, according to the speaker, knew he wasn't creating an intelligence product, but rather a political moment. The speaker claims this email is proof that the letter was a political dirty trick coordinated with the Biden campaign.

Former CIA director Mike Morell and 50 other former intelligence officials signed a letter in October 2020, falsely suggesting that a laptop was Russian disinformation. In sworn testimony to the house judiciary committee, Morell revealed that Secretary of State Anthony Blinken played a significant role in the creation of the now debunked letter. At the time, Blinken was working as a senior adviser to Biden.

I didn't recognize the letter as Biden's. I never discussed persuading him to step aside publicly. He knows I care for him. Reports of me leading a pressure campaign are false. I did not call anyone.

I maintained my security clearance after leaving government service to assist the government if they needed to discuss classified matters. This clearance facilitated discussions with former intelligence officials. The recent executive order was strange and misrepresented facts, claiming we suggested the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation. In reality, we indicated it had characteristics of Russian information operations, including the release of accurate information. This seems to be an attempt to retaliate against those who have criticized him publicly.

The letter highlighted characteristics of a Russian information campaign but did not confirm it as Russian disinformation. The intent was to express uncertainty about the origins of the information, not to assert it as fact. The distinction between information and disinformation was emphasized, suggesting that media oversimplified the message. The impact of the letter on the election dynamics is unclear, but it aimed to raise awareness of potential manipulation by foreign entities. The propagation of the narrative through media mirrored tactics seen in past Russian campaigns, which often seek to create divisions. The discussion acknowledges that while the information was used by Biden, the original intent was to caution against possible foreign influence.

In 2018, there was a claim about taking my security clearance, but it was never revoked. I maintained it for the government's benefit, allowing for discussions on classified matters with agencies like the CIA. The recent executive order was strange and misrepresented facts, suggesting we claimed the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation. Instead, we noted it had hallmarks of Russian information operations, including the release of accurate information. This seems to be an attempt to retaliate against those who have criticized him publicly.

The former acting CIA director coordinated with the Biden campaign to release a letter from 51 intelligence analysts, which has since been disproven. It has now been revealed that some of the signatories were active CIA contractors at the time. The Trump CIA leadership knew about the letter beforehand but did not intervene. This information is currently being reported on justinews.com.

We learn about DC leaks and the connection to APT 28, a Russian military intelligence hacking group. The morning the Hunter Biden story broke in the New York Post, it was confusing. We didn't know what to believe, but it seemed like a possible hacking campaign by APT 28. Despite that, I didn't feel comfortable removing the content from Twitter.

Former CIA director Mike Murrell's email to John Brennan, another former CIA director, has been obtained by Justine News. The email reveals Murrell's intention to create a political moment during the presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Murrell wanted Brennan to sign a letter, which was signed by 51 intelligence professionals, to counter Trump's claims about Hunter Biden's laptop being Russian disinformation. This email suggests that the letter was not an intelligence product but rather a coordinated political dirty trick. The authenticity of the email is significant and raises questions about the letter's credibility.

The speakers discuss a letter they signed regarding a campaign that had similarities to Russian tactics. Speaker 0 defends the letter, stating that they did not claim it was Russian disinformation but rather an information campaign. Speaker 1 questions the impact of the letter, suggesting it influenced candidate Biden. Speaker 0 emphasizes the need for nuance in media coverage and clarifies that they were highlighting the earmarks of a Russian information campaign. Speaker 1 mentions Biden's use of the campaign in debates. Speaker 0 suggests asking Biden about it. The conversation ends with gratitude.

In 2018, I got involved in digging up dirt on Joe Biden in Ukraine through Rudy Giuliani. Despite efforts, no evidence against Biden was found, only Russian disinformation. Biden was part of an anti-corruption campaign. The focus shifted to spreading lies about Biden when valid information ran out. John Solomon and Rudy Giuliani pushed unverified narratives on Fox News.

Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, claimed that the Intelligence Community believes Hunter Biden's laptop and its emails are part of a Russian disinformation campaign. However, the Director of National Intelligence stated that there is no intelligence supporting this claim and no evidence has been shared with Schiff or any other member of Congress. The Director emphasized that using the intelligence community to push a political narrative is unacceptable. He made it clear that Hunter Biden's laptop is not involved in any Russian disinformation campaign, and he believes the American people are aware of this.

The speaker claims the CIA interfered in the 2020 election, referencing RFK Jr.'s statements and using the word "tomatoes" in place of "interference." They allege that platforms censoring this information are complicit in election interference. The speaker discusses a letter signed by 51 former senior intelligence officials who suggested that emails from Hunter Biden's laptop had "classic earmarks of a Russian information operation." The speaker points out that the officials admitted they didn't know if the emails were genuine or if Russia was involved. The speaker identifies some of the signatories as known liars, including James Clapper, Michael Hayden, and Gina Haspel. The speaker claims the CIA is forbidden from interfering in American elections but does so anyway to discredit information, including information related to Hunter Biden. They reference court testimony alleging Joe Biden was aware of and influenced by Hunter's business dealings. The speaker also references Bill Clinton's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker concludes by criticizing intelligence agencies for meddling and lying, and praises those who seek truth and honesty.

Fifty former national intelligence officials, including former heads of the CIA from both parties, have stated that the accusations against me are unfounded and part of a Russian disinformation campaign. With just four days left in the campaign, the emergence of this laptop story seems like a desperate attempt to smear me and my family. The intelligence community has overwhelming evidence of Russian involvement, and I believe the stories about my son are also linked to this. The majority of intelligence experts agree that there is no basis for these claims.

More than 50 ex-intelligence officials claimed the laptop story had Russian origins. Biden referenced this at a debate to counter Trump's accusations of Russian involvement. Translation: Over 50 former intelligence officials stated that the laptop story had Russian origins. Biden used this information during a debate to refute Trump's accusations of Russian involvement.

What if a bomb dropped on your head right now? They disrespected Biden and Obama, but they respected me. Putin went through a lot with me, including a phony witch hunt where they used him and Russia. It was a phony Hunter Biden, Joe Biden scam involving Hillary Clinton and shifty Adam Schiff. It was a Democrat scam, and Putin had to endure it. We didn't end up in a war. He was accused of so much, but he had nothing to do with it. It all came out of Hunter Biden's bathroom and bedroom. They claimed the laptop from hell was made by Russia, but the whole thing was a scam, and Putin had to put up with it. He was wrongly accused of everything.

The speaker is asked about a letter they signed regarding the Hunter Biden situation. They express concern about Russian interference and misinformation, stating that intelligence agencies have found evidence of Russia pushing disinformation. They believe that disinformation is involved in this case and emphasize the importance of not trusting the Russians. When asked if they have any regrets, they state that they do not regret not trusting the Russians.

The letter indicated that the situation had characteristics of a Russian information campaign, but it did not confirm it as Russian disinformation. The intent was to highlight the patterns seen in past Russian operations, not to assert that this instance was definitively Russian. The media often simplifies complex issues into sound bites, which can mislead the public. The discussion acknowledges that while the letter pointed out these characteristics, it’s unclear if it influenced the election or Biden’s campaign. The focus remains on the nature of the information dissemination, which aligns with tactics used by Russian campaigns to create division.

Jessa News obtained an email between former CIA director Mike Morell and John Brennan. It concerns "the 51 intelligence professionals who tried to fake you into thinking that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation when it wasn't." Morell tells Brennan to "sign this letter because I'm, quote, trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue." The speaker notes "A man with a security clearance, a man with the title of CIA director knew that he wasn't creating an intelligence product, American civic duty with 51 people." He says this was to create "a political moment." "Damning evidence." "It is the ultimate proof that what went out on that letter was a political dirty trick coordinated with the Biden campaign."

I was accused of being part of a propaganda effort to censor those questioning the origin of the virus. I stand by my assertion that the virus is not a lab construct, which aligns with the intelligence community's conclusion. I cannot control how my work is used. It is wrong to censor and lie to the public, and I should have done better.

The speaker asks how much the source of the Hunter Biden laptop story matters, given that the information is coming out through Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani. The interviewee responds that the source and timing matter a lot, and that this appears to be classic Soviet Russian tradecraft. According to the interviewee, the Russians understand that the president and his enablers crave dirt on Vice President Biden, so whether the information is real or contrived doesn't matter to them. The interviewee believes emails could be contrived, especially if they appear without metadata. The interviewee states that if the FBI has the computer, they will be able to determine if it is genuine or not, but the timing is curious.