reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Politicians need to understand that high inflation is caused by the federal government, not the private sector. Wealthy individuals often lack insight into the struggles of everyday people. Many are suffering, and it's crucial to listen to their concerns. Engaging in endless wars is not sustainable, and there should be a focus on peace. The divisive rhetoric from leaders only exacerbates the anger in the country. Instead of labeling half the population negatively, we should promote unity and the American dream. Politicians must learn economics to grasp the true causes of inflation, which stem from government actions, not private enterprise.

In this video, the speakers discuss the cause of inflation. They refute the belief that inflation is caused by government spending more money, stating that it is simply not true. They argue that inflation is created in Washington because only the government has the power to create money. They dismiss other groups, such as consumers, producers, trade unions, foreign sheets, and oil imports, as not being responsible for inflation. The speakers assert that the main causes of inflation are excessive government spending and the government's creation of money.

Speaker 0 cites recent inflation figures, saying the latest numbers are 4.2, up from 3.8, and before that 3.3, reported on Trends Journal, and questions what this means while claiming “the best economy the country’s ever had.” Speaker 1 responds by saying it is “the best economy ever,” and points to a State of the Union address made “four days before we bombed Iran” on a weekend when markets were closed. Speaker 1 also claims that “because of me,” gas prices in most states were $2.30, and that gas prices were $7 in California, and adds that “he gets away with this.” Speaker 1 then references prior administrations, contrasting “Genocide Joe” with the speaker’s view of the prior president before him, and also mentions Barack Obama as “the Nobel Peace of Crap Prize winner.” Speaker 0 says it shows that, after traveling the world and looking back at the country, the problem is “the American system” rather than “the American people.” Speaker 0 asserts that America is “a dictatorship,” explaining that there is “no dictator, not a human being,” but that the system is “dictatorial because nothing the hell ever changes no matter who’s in office.” Speaker 0 concludes that if people “can’t control the policies or the government,” then “we are dictated the policies and the government,” defining it as a dictatorship.

Speaker 0 asks if increased electricity prices make a house more expensive, and Speaker 1 agrees it makes homeownership more expensive. Speaker 0 then asks if allowing 10-12 million foreign nationals into the country, all of whom need housing, increases the cost of homeownership. Speaker 1 says it's a distributional question and that they are there to talk about housing supply. Speaker 0 insists they are there to discuss homeownership costs and accuses Speaker 1 of being disingenuous for not admitting that increased demand raises costs. Speaker 1 reiterates that it's a distributional question.

Speaker 0 discusses gas prices, claiming they are wrecking the farmers and questions whether gas should be at this price. He attributes the oil shortage to a War with Iran, which he says was caused by “the tiny hats and the president.” He then says he checked a government website that breaks down petroleum coming in and going out, noting that “down below, you see that there’s actually more coming in now than there was a year ago.” He asks why prices are higher and suggests that someone might be lying about something, noting a discrepancy with claims that refining is insufficient. Speaker 0 continues by referencing the 1970s and stating that they “pulled the exact same playbook,” and he intends to have the audience hear a quote from “the Shah of Iran” about gas lines. He recalls: “Have you seen the lines of cars stretching for blocks, in some cases for miles, waiting to get gas… And you cannot you have imported more oil than any time in the past. Well, not recently, we haven't. You have?” He then remarks, “So after that video, we can see that there’s really no shortage and the gas prices are just being jacked up on purpose.” He asks who’s pulling the strings and answers, “the tiny hats,” asserting that the tiny hats “control the banks, control all of these things, manipulate the numbers, and then kinda screw the people.” He concludes by urging readers to notice the connection to Iran and says it’s “interesting,” leaving the audience to think about it, and ends with a reference to a 1976 water car. Speaker 2 introduces a tangential topic about Stan Meyer’s invention, the water fuel cell, which “takes the place of his old gas tank.” He explains that the water fuel cell “breaks down water molecules into oxygen and hydrogen,” and that hydrogen is used to run his dune buggy. Speaker 1 adds a note about what to use for the fuel cell: “I don't care if you use rain water, well water, city water, ocean water. If you don't have any fresh water, go ahead and use snow.” If there is no snow available, he suggests using salt water, claiming there is “no adverse effect to the fuel cell.”

The speaker reveals the true food inflation by comparing prices at Costco with photos he took a year ago. He points out the significant price increases, such as Madras lentils going from $6.99 to $15.99, and chicken broth increasing from $5.69 to an undisclosed price. The speaker expresses disbelief at the reported 6% to 7% inflation rate, suggesting that the government manipulates data in a questionable manner.

Speaker 0 asks Donald what happened to lowering gas prices and says they need answers. Speaker 1 assumes Speaker 0 lives in California and suggests they should talk to their governor instead of Trump. Speaker 1 states they are paying $2.69 for gas. Speaker 1 concludes by saying California is a ship and they don't know what to tell Speaker 0.

The speaker argues that people should not trust central banks with “yet more power,” saying the answer is a “resounding no.” They claim that the high inflation that began in 2021 was “created by the central banks.” They state that regardless of what central banks say about wars, “the economics is very clear,” and that the speaker could forecast the coming inflation successfully from May 2020 onward. According to the speaker, eighteen months after May 2020, significant inflation would occur because money creation was “just massive off the charts.” The speaker further describes a sequence of events they connect to central banks’ actions. They say the central bank “imposed a fake pandemic,” referring to “that story.” They describe this as involving publicly available records about Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker claims that people like Jeffrey Epstein are “now public record” as being involved “as early as 2017” in setting up a “scheme” connected to this “great pandemic.” They say the scheme was set up “for some investors to make a fortune such as Bill Gates,” and they present this as a matter of public record. The speaker also claims that the plan included ways to “make money injecting people with stuff” and “solve the problem.” They state that Epstein and Bill Gates discussed “how to get rid of the poor people,” again describing it as “matter of public record.” In the speaker’s account, these elements are linked to the use of injections and the alleged intent to remove or eliminate poorer people. Finally, the speaker says that the events described were used “at the same time to push digital ID.” In their narrative, the central bank’s actions and policies are tied together with the alleged pandemic scheme, the alleged financial opportunities for investors, the alleged discussions about eliminating poor people, and the promotion of digital identification systems.

I will bring prices down starting on day one. But that isn't true. Since day one of my presidency, prices have not gone down. They're up, and inflation is getting worse, including the price of gas. Their plan is awful. The Republican plan is to win, families and families win, and billions win. That is the truth.

Donald Trump governs financially better than Joe Biden. Inflation is not a global issue due to COVID supply chain disruptions. Prices for gas, groceries, and dining out have risen since Trump left office, attributed to Biden's regulations on industries. Trump would remove regulations to provide relief to Americans.

In response to questions about how the White House can reach frustrated voters and improve their sense of the situation, Speaker 0 opens by noting that lower inflation and gas prices are key, and asks what the White House can do to make those voters feel better or convince them the situation is improving, also pointing out that they are being told lies by the media, a problem he says Republicans have long faced. Speaker 1 replies by emphasizing a central point derived from polling: there is overwhelming support for President Trump across every issue and dimension. He asserts that the most important point to hammer is that under Trump there was no inflation, whereas Biden’s presidency devastated the economy. He states that there was double-digit inflation overall from when Biden entered to when Biden left, and that prices “went up 30% in four years.” He then claims that when Donald Trump “comes back in,” inflation is “down to near benchmark rates of 2% within months,” describing this as astonishing and asking rhetorically, “How’s that even possible? I mean, we we knew the man was an economic wizard.” He reiterates the question, asking how inflation could move from 30% to nearly 2% in a few months, suggesting that Trump “defied what everybody said was possible.” The exchange centers on contrasting perceptions of economic performance under the two administrations, with Speaker 1 arguing that Trump achieved a rapid and substantial reduction in inflation after a period of high inflation under Biden, and framing this as evidence of Trump’s economic prowess. The dialogue also frames political popularity and media messaging as factors in the public’s views, positioning Trump’s economic record as a core issue for persuading voters who feel left behind.

I will immediately bring prices down starting on day one. That is simply not true. Since day one of my predecessor's presidency, prices have not gone down; they have gone up. Inflation is getting worse. The prices of gas are high. Their plan is awful. The Republican plan is simple: Billionaires win, and families lose. That is the truth.

The speaker acknowledges that the economy was in a bad state when the current president took office. They claim that the previous administration lacked a comprehensive plan and that the current president has taken steps to improve the economy. They mention that gas prices increased due to Putin's war. Another speaker counters these points, stating that most of the jobs created by Biden were actually recovered from the pandemic and that the economy is still far from where it was under Trump. They argue that gas prices rose because of Biden's restrictions on domestic energy production, not because of the Ukraine war. They express skepticism towards the speaker's claims and criticize their credibility.

Speaker 0 claims that in 1996 Bill Clinton “put an act into congress” to “protect cell phone tower companies from lawsuits,” describing it as being done by “pedophiles of congress.” Speaker 0 says that at that time there were “so many cell phone tower company lawsuits happening” because people “realized that these cell phone towers were microwaves,” and that Congress then “went ahead” and created legislation that shielded the industry from legal action. Speaker 0 compares this to another event in 1986 involving “vaccine protection,” saying “Reagan did that one.” Speaker 0 states that “these people are putting things in place to protect these industries which are poisoning the American people,” and identifies “Bill Clinton” as an example in this pattern. Speaker 0 then explains the alleged effect of the 1996 act: if “they install a cell phone tower right in front of your house” and “you come down with any type of illness,” then “you can’t sue for damages.” Speaker 0 adds another example involving animals: if “the birds stop dropping,” then “you can’t sue for damages either for that too.” Speaker 0 says this is because “there are no environmental effects that are allowed to be sued for based on that 1996 act,” and that “they believe” technology “should be able to put this technology everywhere regardless of if it hurts people or animals.” Speaker 0 frames the situation as something the audience should “kind of chew on,” and then says, “But the government would never do that. Right?” Speaker 0 then includes a response attributed to “somebody” who asked, “why does the government dread hurt us?” Speaker 0 reports that this somebody said “the government is lobbied and controlled by the Federal Reserve and the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers,” and that “this is why.” Speaker 0 further states that “they don’t really work for the people anymore,” and that “you can see that on all sides.”

Everyday prices are too high, including food, rent, gas, and back-to-school clothes, which is called Bidenomics. A loaf of bread costs 50% more today, and ground beef is up almost 50%. There's not much left at the end of the month. Bidenomics is working. The price of housing has gone up, and it feels hard to get ahead. The speaker states they are very proud of Bidenomics.

The speaker argues that central banks should not be given more power, asserting that the answer is a resounding no. They claim that the high inflation beginning in 2021 was created by central banks, regardless of any explanations about wars, and assert that the economics are clear. The speaker states they could forecast from May 2020 onwards that eighteen months later there would be significant inflation because the money creation was “massive off the charts.” They allege that central banks “imposed a fake pandemic,” referencing a conspiracy-like claim about a manufactured crisis. The speaker asserts that people such as Jeffrey Epstein are part of this narrative and that Epstein, in public records, was involved as early as 2017 in “setting up the scheme of this great pandemic for some investors to make a fortune,” naming Bill Gates as an example. The statement continues, claiming that “we can also make money injecting people with stuff and solve the problem” as discussed by Epstein and Bill Gates, and characterizes this as a matter of public record about how to “get rid of the poor people.” Finally, the speaker contends that this was used “at the same time to push digital ID.”

The speaker believes that the government has been lying about inflation for decades. They mention an article in the New York Times that claims inflation is declining, but groceries remain expensive. The speaker explains that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is used to measure inflation, but it can be manipulated by the government. The CPI now considers changes in the quality of goods and allows for substitutions, which can result in lower reported inflation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, which calculates the CPI, operates with secrecy and does not make the raw data available to the public. The speaker questions the lack of transparency and suggests that inflation may be higher than reported.

In the video, the speaker discusses old newspaper ads from 20+ years ago showing significantly lower prices for groceries compared to today. They highlight items like beef, sausages, avocados, coffee, and more that were much cheaper back then. The speaker also mentions the current state of inflation, blaming the Federal Reserve's actions and the impact on food prices. Additionally, they promote products available at doctorjonesnaturals.com and urge viewers to check them out for health benefits.

The speaker criticizes the finance minister for not understanding how the carbon tax leads to inflation. They explain that the carbon tax is paid at every stage of the food production process, from the farmer to the grocery store, ultimately causing Canadians to struggle to afford food.

Speaker 0 raises concerns about the current policies that are damaging our way of life and questions why such drastic measures are being taken. They mention influential globalists, like Claus Schwab, who see the pandemic as an opportunity to reset the world. Speaker 1, the Prime Minister, claims to be unaware of Schwab's book but advises against conspiracy theories. Speaker 0 presents evidence of a letter from the Prime Minister to Schwab, thanking him for his book and calling it a hopeful analysis. Speaker 1 dismisses it as a polite gesture and implies that they cannot read every book they receive. Speaker 0 points out the contradiction, and Speaker 1 deflects the accusation.

Kamala Harris is talking about fixing the economy, which they said was booming. To fix it, they want to give more control to the government to control prices and prevent gouging, even though the government created the problem. They shut down the economy and transferred $3.4 trillion from the lower and middle class to the elites, allowing large corporations to grow while wiping out competition. The speaker claims Harris doesn't mention profit margins, net profits, revenues, or inflation. For example, grocery stores with 2-3% profit margins saw revenues increase due to COVID-related inflation, but their profit margin remained the same. The speaker says the government doesn't talk about reducing taxes, regulations, or insurance costs. Gas stations make 3-7¢ profit per gallon, while the government makes 53¢ through taxes and regulations. The speaker concludes that government policies, not businesses, are responsible for price gouging by eliminating competition.

The President mentioned that inflation was high when he took office, but it was actually 1.4% in January 2021. The pandemic and supply chain disruptions caused inflation to rise globally. The situation worsened due to Russia's war in Ukraine. The President took action to address supply chain issues, like releasing oil reserves. Progress has been made in lowering costs and managing inflation since then.

The speaker reports an unusually high monthly utility bill of $810 for gas and electricity, noting that neighbors in the same area have similarly expensive bills. They mention that the gas and electric company, which effectively owns the area, has been signaling through the news that bills would be higher. The speaker questions how the situation can be tolerated, expressing concern about protests and the pressure to turn off heating despite personal needs. They highlight a family situation with three children, including two nonverbal autistic children who require ongoing therapy, costing about $10,000 per year. The speaker asks whether they can continue sending their children to therapy if they must pay over $800 per month just to have heat and electricity in their home. They describe their home as a twelve hundred fifty square foot ranch brick house, noting that it is not large. The speaker emphasizes a perceived lack of accountability, asking how the company can be allowed to act this way. They state, "They are price gouging the American people." They express frustration that there seem to be no repercussions and argue that "Something has to change."

The speaker argues that the affordability crises facing Americans are traceable directly to Joe Biden and congressional Democrats. The speaker attributes three specific failures to this leadership, presenting them as causal factors behind rising costs and economic strain. First, the speaker claims that homes have become unaffordable because “we had 20,000,000 illegal aliens in this country taking homes that ought by right to go to American citizens.” This assertion links housing affordability directly to immigration levels and a perceived misallocation of housing resources. Second, the speaker contends that tax bills have become unaffordable because “Democrats were raising taxes while congressional Republicans under president's leadership were now cutting taxes.” In this view, tax policy under Democrats is framed as punitive to ordinary Americans, in contrast to Republican tax reductions during the same period. Third, the speaker asserts that food has become more expensive due to “trillions of dollars” being printed and directed into “green scams that made our agricultural economy suffer while Americans were paying higher prices for food.” This claim connects monetary policy and climate-related or green initiatives with increased food costs. Across these points, the speaker emphasizes a consistent narrative: on each major affordability issue—housing, taxes, and food—the administration’s and Democrats’ policies are presented as the root cause. The speaker concludes with, “On every single one of those issues, mister president, I think we've made incredible progress,” signaling a claim of progress despite the cited problems. The statement implies that while the speaker believes progress has been made, the underlying causes identified for each affordability challenge remain central to the discussion.