TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Cell phone towers and 5G radiation concerns are unfounded. Even if you had cell phones around your head and genitals, there would be no need to worry. One person believed his cell phone caused his bone cancer, but there is no evidence to support this. Radiation from cell phones is not the same as that from nuclear bombs. Everything emits radiation, but it's the wavelength that matters. Only high-frequency radiation like ultraviolet and beyond can cause DNA damage. Your phone's radiation is nowhere near that level.

Speaker 0: Nature is vital to our existence, offering essential resources and a home for wildlife. From the air we breathe to the food we eat, our ecosystems are essential to life on Earth. But as we embrace modern conveniences, such as wireless technology, we're introducing massive amounts of electromagnetic radiation into our environment. How does this invisible toxin affect the natural world we depend on? Let's explore. Wireless radiation, also known as radio frequency or RF radiation, is emitted by devices like cell phones, Wi Fi routers, and cell towers. It's all around us, helping us stay connected and communicate seamlessly. Both humans and animals rely on the Earth's natural electromagnetic field. The rapid expansion of wireless network technologies, like five g and the Internet of Things network, introduce new foreign electromagnetic signals, disrupting nature's delicate balance. The increasing presence of wireless radiation in our environment raises concerns about its impact on wildlife. Birds, bees, and other creatures rely heavily on natural electromagnetic fields for navigation and communication. What happens when these fields are disrupted? Studies show that birds experience disorientation due to interference with their magnetic navigation systems. This can lead to migratory disruptions and other behavior changes. Bees, crucial pollinators in our ecosystem, are also affected. Research indicates that exposure to wireless radiation decreases the colony strength and egg laying rates of bees. And it's not just animals and insects, plants too are affected by wireless radiation. Studies show that wireless radiation exposure damages trees, shortens plant lifespans, and contributes to rapid species decline. The underwater Internet of Things network, also known as the smart ocean, is a growing network of underwater devices and technologies that collect and transmit data beneath the ocean's surface. The wireless signals emitted by the underwater IOT network are completely audible to marine life and will become an inescapable torture chamber for ocean habitants such as dolphins and other marine mammals that use sonar and sound waves to navigate, communicate, feed, and reproduce. Wireless networks have significantly increased the radio frequency or RF environment on Earth by at least 10 to the eighteenth times. Additionally, five g deployment and other new internet services will require tens of thousands of additional satellites to be launched into Earth's atmosphere, which has already been shown to produce bright lights in the night sky and may produce, as of yet unknown, environmental consequences. Wireless radiation is a part of our modern world, and its convenience is undeniable. However, understanding and mitigating its environmental impact is essential for the health of our planet. Together, we can ensure that our technological progress does not come at the cost of our natural world. CHD's electromagnetic radiation and wireless team is fighting back against involuntary radiation exposure from wireless tech and the privacy invasion that comes with it.

Cell phone radiation is harmful and can cause cancer, including glioblastoma. It also affects the blood-brain barrier. Despite being labeled a conspiracy theory, I won a case in front of the Court of Appeals. Conspiracy theories are simply things the government doesn't want you to know or think about.

Wearing Apple AirPods exposes you to harmful microwave radiation. Studies show over 1500 research studies suggest this radiation is harmful. Using wired headphones with your phone on airplane mode reduces exposure to harmful EMFs.

In 1971, the US Navy studied the dangers of non-ionizing radiation from cell phones, Wi-Fi, smart devices, and wireless air pods. The study found that non-ionizing radiation can cause central nervous system issues like headaches, insomnia, restlessness, memory loss, seizures, and convulsions. Additional symptoms include anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, sleepiness, chest pain, tremors, hallucinations, and changes to DNA and blood sugar. The endocrine system can also be affected, specifically the thyroid. Further symptoms include DNA mutations, sparking of dental fillings, hair loss, brittle hair, and ringing or buzzing in the ears. Companies producing these devices cannot be sued.

I use Bluetooth headphones. I'm not concerned about EMF fields. The energy levels are minimal and far from the ionizing radiation that raises tumor concerns. Bluetooth devices operate at very low power levels, and we are constantly exposed to various signals, whether we use Bluetooth or not. Additionally, everyone is exposed to small amounts of ionizing radiation in their environment, unless they are underwater. It's simply unavoidable.

Wi-Fi, being so prevalent, might be negatively impacting our health. I believe it degrades mitochondria and compromises the blood-brain barrier. I found an article suggesting radiofrequency radiation affects the blood-brain barrier's permeability and alters microRNA expression in the brain, potentially leading to neurodegenerative diseases. Research indicates this has been expanded on by researchers in China with a published article. They even call it leaky brain. It seems findings in the US were followed by suppression, misinformation, and a shutdown of government-funded research. It's the same old story.

I stopped using Bluetooth headphones after developing cysts behind my ears, which I learned were lymph swellings. When I used them again, the cysts returned, along with heat effects. While some experts I spoke to are not concerned about EMF levels, I prefer wired headphones for safety. I also sleep better with my phone out of the bedroom and have heard of people turning off their Wi-Fi at night. Health trends have evolved over time, with practices like resistance training and yoga becoming mainstream. I wish we could see how current health concerns, like Bluetooth headphones and sunscreen, will be viewed in the future. I strive to live naturally, avoiding processed foods and using minimal products.

The speaker explains that they want to keep the meter in the green band. They turn the meter on and note that in their own home, they have control of all wireless and can bounce the reading into the green area. They demonstrate what happens when they open up an earbud case, describing that the reading immediately shifts into the screaming red, which they say is as bad as it gets. They report that at home, their typical baseline is about two to three microwatts. Just by opening the earbud case, the reading jumps to 130,000 microwatts, then 152,000 microwatts, and it continues to climb. The speaker emphasizes that the goal is to be at 10 microwatts or less. They reiterate that it is not 10,000, but 10. Next, they simulate removing the earphones as if they were going to use them, noting that they don’t use them at all. They mention that they “just topped off my meter” by exposing the earbud, and they acknowledge some camera-related awkwardness. They report that with the earbud in the case, the reading was just shy of 200,000 microwatts. However, when they take the single earbud out and bring it up to the meter or “right up to the brain,” the reading reaches 3,180,000 microwatts. They reiterate the target of being under 10 microwatts and contrast it with the readings shown, indicating that a single earbud can produce a reading in the millions of microwatts. They state that this is a concern related to exposure levels. Finally, they remark that now there is a whole generation putting these ear pods up to their brains. They suggest that some people are likely sleeping with them at night, even though their bodies would be doing cell repair and regeneration during sleep, implying a potential clash between usage and natural biological processes.

I use Bluetooth headphones and I'm not concerned about EMF fields. The energy levels are so low that they don't pose a risk like ionizing radiation does. Bluetooth devices operate at very low power levels, and we are constantly exposed to various signals, regardless of whether we use Bluetooth or not. Additionally, everyone is exposed to small amounts of ionizing radiation in their environment, unless they are underwater. It's simply unavoidable.

According to Doctor Barrett from Wellness Secrets, AirPods emit high levels of EMF. A magnetic field meter test showed spikes up to two, three, and even four while an AirPod was playing music. Long-term magnetic field exposure has been shown to cause cancers in small children, and the effects of AirPods near the brain are unknown. Radio frequency measurements also showed spikes. Apple advises keeping phones a certain distance from the body, but AirPods are inside the base of the skull. High levels of radio frequency for extended periods can cause cellular damage. Some people, including celebrities, are avoiding wireless devices in the ears and using wired devices instead to protect their cells.

Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and Speaker 2 discuss headphones and potential thyroid health concerns. They note they no longer wear Bluetooth and now prefer wired headphones; Speaker 0 says they use wired headphones plugged into the phone, and they are “just Amazon products. Nothing’s fancy, and they work just as well.” Speaker 1 expresses relief that Speaker 0 moved away from wireless, mentioning that they had shared information for years and kept sending content until Speaker 0 switched. Speaker 2 introduces a shift in how people view wireless headphones. They acknowledge that wireless is convenient, but say it’s moving from outside the Overton window toward inside it. They reference a recent analysis (epidemiology) showing a strong or significant association between Bluetooth headphone use (AirPods, Beats, wireless) and an increased incidence of thyroid nodules, noting this applies to both men and women. They describe the thyroid as a master gland and explain that thyroid nodules can be precancerous. They emphasize proximity to a hormonally sensitive gland and RF EMF exposure from a device worn near the neck, asserting they can measure RF with a meter and that earbuds emit RF energy. They compare the RF exposure to that of microwaves, stating the measurement units are microwatts per meter squared and that the RF band of Bluetooth is essentially the same as that of a microwave. They describe the headphones as “a small microwave in your head” for hours a day and note that readings can be obtained by placing the RF meter near a microwave. Speaker 1 agrees with caution, saying they won’t put a cell phone to their ear and questions why anyone would wear earbuds all day, feeling “spidery” about it. Speaker 0 reports returning to wired setups (Apple 1/1Point0) and values conversation without wireless interference, calling it nostalgic and safer long term. Speaker 1 discusses reasons for pushback: tradition, fashion, or fear of changing habits. They mention they once bought olive-colored Apple headphones as a fashion statement and acknowledge that appearance can distract from the health discussion. Speaker 0 clarifies they aren’t “tin hat” about everything but notes that people who sounded alarms often get vindicated later. They prefer alternatives if there’s even a slight chance of risk. Speaker 1 shares a light parenting anecdote: their five-year-old confessed briefly wearing wired headphones for five minutes, illustrating the challenge of managing kids’ exposure. They reflect on broader concerns about kids, screen time, and technology exposure, referencing a recent guest’s emphasis on limiting screen time. Speaker 0 ends with a Casino-like caution: if there’s a better alternative that works as well, why take the chance?

Speaker 0 argues that tin foil hats actually work and demonstrates how a small amount of aluminum foil can reduce RF electromagnetic fields (RFEMF) from a WiFi router. He shows a RFEMF meter reading standing a few feet away from the router, noting measurements between 100 and 200 microwatts per square meter. As he moves right up to the WiFi router, the reading climbs to over a million, sometimes 2,000,000 microwatts per square meter. He states that generally you want to be working and living in an environment that's less than a 100 or 200 microwatts per square meter. He shares that when he is sitting ten to fifteen feet away, the reading is 18,000 to 20,000 microwatts per square meter. He asserts that this is not an environment he wants to be working in all day. Mentioning that there is a lot of debate about RFEMF and its harm to humans, he says there are a significant number of studies suggesting that RFEMF from a WiFi router or your phone can affect human biology negatively. The proposed solution is to wrap the router with aluminum foil. He states, “Literally just wrap this around the WiFi router, and now you're officially a conspiracy theorist. It's modern art,” yet demonstrates the result. After wrapping around the router, the reading between 500 and 1,000 microwatts per square meter is observed, representing a 10- to 20-fold reduction. He notes that right before wrapping, the reading was 100,000 microwatts per square meter, and after wrapping it, the reading is five to 7,000 microwatts per square meter just in front of the router. He emphasizes that the router remains still very high right at the device, but that the levels are significantly lower throughout the rest of the house. He concludes by stating, “Tinfoil hats work. 5¢ of tinfoil on your WiFi router, something that's in every home, can significantly decrease your exposure throughout the day while you're working.” He ends by encouraging viewers to send this to somebody they know who works very close to a WiFi router.

The speaker expresses strong concern about five Gs towers, suggesting their worry is high (even implying a scale up to nine or ten). They state that calling it “five Gs” is a misnomer because it doesn’t tell you what’s wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths, and some of them are very bad. They note that in Europe, regulations are an order of magnitude lower than what is allowed here. There are literally over 10,000 studies that document a number of ill effects, including cancer and tumor growth.

AirPods and wireless headphones emit massive amounts of radio frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) that go straight through the brain and into the body. According to about 1500 studies, these EMFs are harmful to humans, creating DNA damage and oxidative stress. One study looking at human sperm showed that when exposed to EMFs from cell phones, the sperm experience more DNA breaks and less motility. The solution is to use wired headphones and to put your cell phone completely on airplane mode when carrying it.

So when I travel, I bring my EMF reader with me. Notice that zero point zero. And I'm in a building, and there's people above me. But when you unplug everything, that's what happens. When I had this on, and it was pinging like crazy, and I couldn't figure out where the router was. What I noticed was that phone was plugged in. That's a wireless phone. And look at this. The router was below the bed. So this was going off the charts because they hid the router underneath the bed. So while people are sleeping and they're like, oh, I can't figure out why I didn't get a good night sleep. We got Wi Fi pinging in your place. When you put this closer to here, you see how that's starting to increase? Because the RFs that are toxic can run off of the wires. So it's important

- "We have our own government." - "The US National Toxicology Program completed a $30,000,000 study that concluded cell phones cause cancer and DNA damage." - "Italy's Ramazzini Institute completed another study that shows from cell towers cancers, DNA damage, and more." - "So it doesn't matter where these signals are emanating from." - "The World Health Organization in 2011 said it doesn't matter where it comes from." - "All of this man made radiofrequency back in 2011 was classified as a group two b possible human carcinogen." - "What was missing back in 2011 were these animal studies that the National Toxicology Program and the Ramazzini Institute and others have completed that show clear evidence of cancer." - "Now clear evidence is the top of five categories that can be assigned." - "That should have triggered public policy to inform all the parents and to protect us, but it didn't."

Lou shows an image of a guy running with ear pods and checking a device like an Apple Watch, asking how much that is doing inside his body and noting many people are likely using them. Speaker 1 says we’ve all been sold sexy products that are fun, but the risks aren’t being shared. They offer a free public education webinar every month, two hours, to walk through the science, and for cliff notes they provide the following immediate observations people may notice: - Headaches - Nosebleeds - Anxiety - Depression - Insomnia They describe this as a neurotoxin that pulsates our biological system many, many times per second, more than the Earth’s natural electromagnetic field. The brain perceives this invisible light energy as the lights are on, which disrupts the circadian rhythm in the wee hours of darkness. Melatonin suppression is singled out as a major consequence, affecting sleep and the nighttime cell repair and regeneration processes. The blood-brain barrier is a membrane surrounding the brain that helps keep toxins out of sensitive brain areas. The speaker claims that constant pulsing with man-made microwave radiofrequency opens up or permeates the blood-brain barrier, allowing toxins to accompany blood into the brain and contributing to increased neurotoxicity today. The speaker also mentions something called rouleaux formation. When radiating devices like a phone are held, the pinky finger tingles. Citing Dr. Magda Havas and Dr. Rob Brown, they say this exposure leads to rouleaux formation. The speaker explains rouleaux as red blood cells that are normally free-floating and deliver oxygen throughout the body being affected by microwave radiation, causing red blood cells to become magnetized and stick together, forming chains like a stack of coins that cannot efficiently reach tissues and organs to deliver oxygen. Rouleaux formation is described as a very serious concern.

There are many small devices that claim to block EMFs without affecting cell signals, but as an electromagnetic engineer, I am skeptical. If such a device existed, the military would use it widely, and I would be aware of it.

My Wi-Fi router emits harmful radiation, with levels reaching 2,500,000 microwatts per meter squared when turned on. This can cause cancer and neurological issues. To reduce exposure, stay at least 10 feet away from the router. At 20 feet away, levels drop to 1,000 microwatts per meter squared. The safe zone is below 10 microwatts per meter squared.

"This is a small sample of uranium." "five g radiation is nonionizing radiation and has a wavelength in the millimeter range, very close to what microwave range frequencies just like Wi Fi and microwave ovens give off." "So technically, the main damage we need to worry about with five g is if it's giving enough power to heat your body up like in a microwave." "Let's see how strong the signal is from my phone." "Woah. 89." "you actually get way more radiation holding your phone to your head than being near a tower." "it's orders of magnitude lower than the amount that could cause heating to your body." "the battery warming up in your phone is gonna cause more heating on your body than the five g radiation is." "Aren't you glad cell phones don't use uranium?"

Speaker 0: I think what a lot of people aren't really familiar with is the bioengineering aspect of this, and we only need to look to this recently published headline from the Daily Mail, which was resurfaced, declassified CIA files that revealed a chilling blueprint to manipulate Americans' minds through covert drugging with vaccines. And it's not just vaccines that was in that blueprint. It's also the food, the water supply, pretty much altering our state of mind and our biology through all of these methods. And this is going back all the way to the fifties. One can only imagine how far they've come now, but you've been digging into this, and you have a bit of an idea as to how far they've come. To us about your latest research. Speaker 1: So you're absolutely right. And this has been, you know, a slow progression. Nothing is just being, you know, introduced new. I mean, it the technology has advanced, but it's been going on for decades decades, hundreds of years. And when you think about pharmaceuticals, the the apparatus of pharmaceuticals, they are all they it is medicinal chemistry, which is synthetic materials, synthetic biology, engineered bacteria, yeasts, molds, and all of those things like you just said. We have we are being assaulted with these these materials, which are now considered devices, you know, with the manipulated EMF and frequencies. And all of those are to exactly what you just said, weaken the system. And really this pro this slow progression of a we're in the midst of a forced evolution to become providers of a synthetic material, hybrid synthetic material. So we'll continue to produce as we do because the humanity's biological systems are by design meant to thrive and recycle and and repurpose themselves, but to survive. And so we accept these synthetic materials, and we and our body slowly begin to make accommodations to those mutations, natural mutations, but also so much of these so much of the synthetic material is coded to go in and trigger a mutation or to forcibly cause a mutation. So we literally are walking around. I mean, all of us, and it goes from the tiny little mushroom that's growing in the woods to, you know, aquatic life to every single biological electrical system, the nervous system, you know, is based on frequency. It's based on electricity. And so that is that's what's being attacked is the nervous system and the immune systems of every living being. Speaker 0: Now you're talking about some very important things here, Lisa. You've sent me this article from Medium titled the synthetic nervous system, a blueprint for physical AI. And in this article, it talks about how for the past decade, AI has lived primarily in a box, but now, our, you know, our interaction with AI has been linguistic and digital. We've cracked the code apparently, completely on generative AI, unlocking the ability to, listen to this, manipulate symbols, pixels, and code at scale, but we're now entering a far more complex epoch, the era of physical AI. And they are talking about the transition from AI that thinks to AI that acts. So they're saying the intelligence behind humanoid robots. They also give, you know, autonomous systems and things of this nature. My concern is that their plan stated goal is that they want humans to integrate with AI. This is something that even Elon Musk itself has said we need to do in order to stay relevant. And your research shows that they're already in the process of doing that. Talk to us a little bit about that. Speaker 1: Yes. And probably have. We and and, you know, I think that life as we know it will fairly stay the same because what the integration is through, and you've heard of this, is the digital twin. You know, assigning each of us a representative in the AI ecosystem, ecosystem, which which is is a a digital twin. But that digital twin is able to function and, perform because it is it is based off of your data, your biological data, your, that they are going in and removing and stealing through the infiltrators and facilitators that is vaccines, bioengineered foods, bioengineered bacteria. The, you know, the pharmaceutical industry is the perfect setup, and it's only one of one setup that goes in, and now these are all synthetic material devices. They work off of Wi Fi. They're software platforms, and they are all digital. And they are being monitored by the Department of Energy, HHS, MITRE now, these private companies and private oligarch, you know, tech companies that all have access to our free our our inner, you know, biological data DNA and and everything. And so that the AI platform, in order for it to succeed and for its longevity, there has to be a cohesive connection between humanity because we are the fuel that is going to feed that AI ecosystem. And it cannot it it's not gonna be one or the other. It has to work cohesively, and and they have to be joined. And how the the joining of those literally is through an infiltration system, which is primarily vaccines and engineered pathogens.

"Never ever ever put a cell phone on your ear." "Tell your kids. I'm gonna prove it to you and to them." "This right here is measuring." "So we're at point two, point six. Now watch it when it comes closer. 28, 33, 29, 39." "Do you see the difference?" "What was that?" ""30 times the amount of radiation going into my head." "Always use speakerphone." "Make sure your kids see this because they're the biggest offenders." "Oh, and don't put it back in your pocket." "If you put it on your body, always have it on airplane mode."

I stopped using earbuds for a couple of reasons, including accidentally swallowing one while taking supplements. I also tend to misplace them. I noticed they generate heat, and I'm concerned about the effects of heat near the brain, as it can affect neural tissue. Using an analogy of a car's cooling system, our bodies have a similar mechanism. Blood circulates to regulate temperature, dissipating heat effectively. While earbuds may generate some local heat, the body's blood flow and cooling processes can handle it. Overall, any temperature increase from using earbuds is unlikely to cause significant harm.